home.social

Search

1000 results for “electron_wizard”

  1. My photos page has been neglected for too long. Now finally some photos are shown off and has some fancy features behind it (Flickr's Layout and PhotoSwipe).

    joelvonrotz.ch/writing/photo-g

  2. The second thing I had to do was this! Parsed Spongebob's essay on my ipad and converted it to a wallpaper for the X4.

    Here's the link readme.club/wallpapers/spongeb

  3. With the X4 in my hands, I've written up a very quick first impression. It's a cool little device!

    joelvonrotz.ch/writing/xteink-

  4. @joel Am I now part of the cool people club?

  5. Just finished "Cairn", probably one of the best games about climbing! Going to the bouldering gym definitely helped playing the game, as you could apply climbing moves to your advantage. Such a cool game!
    #gaming #cairn #notthepnpsystem

  6. Just finished "Cairn", probably one of the best games about climbing! Going to the bouldering gym definitely helped playing the game, as you could apply climbing moves to your advantage. Such a cool game!

  7. Just finished "Cairn", probably one of the best games about climbing! Going to the bouldering gym definitely helped playing the game, as you could apply climbing moves to your advantage. Such a cool game!
    #gaming #cairn #notthepnpsystem

  8. Just finished "Cairn", probably one of the best games about climbing! Going to the bouldering gym definitely helped playing the game, as you could apply climbing moves to your advantage. Such a cool game!
    #gaming #cairn #notthepnpsystem

  9. Just finished "Cairn", probably one of the best games about climbing! Going to the bouldering gym definitely helped playing the game, as you could apply climbing moves to your advantage. Such a cool game!
    #gaming #cairn #notthepnpsystem

  10. And post number two offloaded. Completed this frame bag guide, as it was collecting dust for quite a while (started a little more than one year ago). The frame bag is still going strong after more than 5000km of cycling!

    joelvonrotz.ch/writing/sewing-

  11. Heyo License-Chooser, does anybody know the difference between EUPL and GPL licenses?

    I mostly don't really understand the license lingo, as English is not my mother tongue.

  12. “There are things done today in electrical science which would have been deemed unholy by the very men who discovered electricity, who would themselves not so long before have been burned as wizards”*…

    Climate change continues. There is broad evidence (and consensus) that our environment, thus our ways of life, our livelihoods— indeed, our lives— are threatened. On the heels of a call from Trump to world leaders to abandon the climate fight, followed by a disappointing COP30 conference, it’s easy to be discouraged. But that, of course, is no answer.

    Rather, we have to find ways to mitigate the damage that we’ve already locked in, even as we acclerate a transition to clean energy… which begins by (re-)framing and (re-)focusing the challenge. Ember, a clean energy think tank, suggests a candidate that, while it speaks to the moral obligations addressed by one of the models it means to augment/replace, has a more positive orientation…

    Humanity is graduating from burning fossil commodities to harnessing manufactured technologies—from hunting scarce fossils to farming the inexhaustible sun, from consuming Earth’s resources to
    merely borrowing them.

    This isn’t a marginal climate substitution. It’s an energy revolution.

    The magnetic centre is the electron: we are revolutionising how we generate, use, and connect
    electrons. Solar and wind are conquering electricity supply. EVs, heat pumps, and AI are electrifying major new uses. Batteries and digitalisation are connecting supply and demand.

    Three reinforcing shifts. One energy revolution. The electrotech revolution.

    At its core, this revolution is driven by physics, economics, and geopolitics. After all, the arc of energy
    history bends towards solutions that are leaner, cheaper and more secure.

    Short-terms setbacks matter, but fundamentals matter more. And the fundamentals are stacked in electrotech’s favour.

    Physics. Electrotech makes a mockery of setting fossils on fire and losing two-thirds of the energy to heat. Electrotech is three times as efficient.

    Economics. Technologies get cheaper with scale. Commodities get more expensive the deeper you dig.

    Geopolitics. Three quarters of the world is dependent on fossil imports. 92% of countries have renewables potential over 10x their current demand.

    Electrotech has grown exponentially for decades. The difference today is that it’s too cheap to contain and too big to ignore. If current exponentials hold for five more years, global fossil demand will fall off its plateau.

    Welcome to the Age of Electrotech…

    A long and meaty presentation: “The Electrotech Revolution- the shape of things to come,” from @ember-energy.org.

    One notes that the electrification that Ember pushes has other advocates, many of whom have been vocal for years; c.f., e.g., Saul Griffin. Still, another voice in the chorus is welcome.

    * Bram Stoker

    ###

    As we plug in, we might send charged birthday greetings to Franz Aepinus; he was born on this date in 1724. A mathematician, scientist, and natural philosopher, he is best known for his research, both theoretical and experimental, into electricity and magnetism. Aepinus’ Tentamen theoriae electricitatis et magnetismi (1759; “An Attempt at a Theory of Electricity and Magnetism”) was the first work to apply mathematics to the theory of electricity and magnetism. And his experiments led to the design of the parallel-plate capacitor, a device used to store energy in an electric field. 

    source

    #Aepinus #capacitor #climate #climateChange #culture #development #electricity #electrification #electrotech #Ember #energy #FranzAepinus #history #magnetism #Mathematics #politics #Science #Technology

  13. “There are things done today in electrical science which would have been deemed unholy by the very men who discovered electricity, who would themselves not so long before have been burned as wizards”*…

    Climate change continues. There is broad evidence (and consensus) that our environment, thus our ways of life, our livelihoods— indeed, our lives— are threatened. On the heels of a call from Trump to world leaders to abandon the climate fight, followed by a disappointing COP30 conference, it’s easy to be discouraged. But that, of course, is no answer.

    Rather, we have to find ways to mitigate the damage that we’ve already locked in, even as we acclerate a transition to clean energy… which begins by (re-)framing and (re-)focusing the challenge. Ember, a clean energy think tank, suggests a candidate that, while it speaks to the moral obligations addressed by one of the models it means to augment/replace, has a more positive orientation…

    Humanity is graduating from burning fossil commodities to harnessing manufactured technologies—from hunting scarce fossils to farming the inexhaustible sun, from consuming Earth’s resources to
    merely borrowing them.

    This isn’t a marginal climate substitution. It’s an energy revolution.

    The magnetic centre is the electron: we are revolutionising how we generate, use, and connect
    electrons. Solar and wind are conquering electricity supply. EVs, heat pumps, and AI are electrifying major new uses. Batteries and digitalisation are connecting supply and demand.

    Three reinforcing shifts. One energy revolution. The electrotech revolution.

    At its core, this revolution is driven by physics, economics, and geopolitics. After all, the arc of energy
    history bends towards solutions that are leaner, cheaper and more secure.

    Short-terms setbacks matter, but fundamentals matter more. And the fundamentals are stacked in electrotech’s favour.

    Physics. Electrotech makes a mockery of setting fossils on fire and losing two-thirds of the energy to heat. Electrotech is three times as efficient.

    Economics. Technologies get cheaper with scale. Commodities get more expensive the deeper you dig.

    Geopolitics. Three quarters of the world is dependent on fossil imports. 92% of countries have renewables potential over 10x their current demand.

    Electrotech has grown exponentially for decades. The difference today is that it’s too cheap to contain and too big to ignore. If current exponentials hold for five more years, global fossil demand will fall off its plateau.

    Welcome to the Age of Electrotech…

    A long and meaty presentation: “The Electrotech Revolution- the shape of things to come,” from @ember-energy.org.

    One notes that the electrification that Ember pushes has other advocates, many of whom have been vocal for years; c.f., e.g., Saul Griffin. Still, another voice in the chorus is welcome.

    * Bram Stoker

    ###

    As we plug in, we might send charged birthday greetings to Franz Aepinus; he was born on this date in 1724. A mathematician, scientist, and natural philosopher, he is best known for his research, both theoretical and experimental, into electricity and magnetism. Aepinus’ Tentamen theoriae electricitatis et magnetismi (1759; “An Attempt at a Theory of Electricity and Magnetism”) was the first work to apply mathematics to the theory of electricity and magnetism. And his experiments led to the design of the parallel-plate capacitor, a device used to store energy in an electric field. 

    source

    #Aepinus #capacitor #climate #climateChange #culture #development #electricity #electrification #electrotech #Ember #energy #FranzAepinus #history #magnetism #Mathematics #politics #Science #Technology

  14. “There are things done today in electrical science which would have been deemed unholy by the very men who discovered electricity, who would themselves not so long before have been burned as wizards”*…

    Climate change continues. There is broad evidence (and consensus) that our environment, thus our ways of life, our livelihoods— indeed, our lives— are threatened. On the heels of a call from Trump to world leaders to abandon the climate fight, followed by a disappointing COP30 conference, it’s easy to be discouraged. But that, of course, is no answer.

    Rather, we have to find ways to mitigate the damage that we’ve already locked in, even as we acclerate a transition to clean energy… which begins by (re-)framing and (re-)focusing the challenge. Ember, a clean energy think tank, suggests a candidate that, while it speaks to the moral obligations addressed by one of the models it means to augment/replace, has a more positive orientation…

    Humanity is graduating from burning fossil commodities to harnessing manufactured technologies—from hunting scarce fossils to farming the inexhaustible sun, from consuming Earth’s resources to
    merely borrowing them.

    This isn’t a marginal climate substitution. It’s an energy revolution.

    The magnetic centre is the electron: we are revolutionising how we generate, use, and connect
    electrons. Solar and wind are conquering electricity supply. EVs, heat pumps, and AI are electrifying major new uses. Batteries and digitalisation are connecting supply and demand.

    Three reinforcing shifts. One energy revolution. The electrotech revolution.

    At its core, this revolution is driven by physics, economics, and geopolitics. After all, the arc of energy
    history bends towards solutions that are leaner, cheaper and more secure.

    Short-terms setbacks matter, but fundamentals matter more. And the fundamentals are stacked in electrotech’s favour.

    Physics. Electrotech makes a mockery of setting fossils on fire and losing two-thirds of the energy to heat. Electrotech is three times as efficient.

    Economics. Technologies get cheaper with scale. Commodities get more expensive the deeper you dig.

    Geopolitics. Three quarters of the world is dependent on fossil imports. 92% of countries have renewables potential over 10x their current demand.

    Electrotech has grown exponentially for decades. The difference today is that it’s too cheap to contain and too big to ignore. If current exponentials hold for five more years, global fossil demand will fall off its plateau.

    Welcome to the Age of Electrotech…

    A long and meaty presentation: “The Electrotech Revolution- the shape of things to come,” from @ember-energy.org.

    One notes that the electrification that Ember pushes has other advocates, many of whom have been vocal for years; c.f., e.g., Saul Griffin. Still, another voice in the chorus is welcome.

    * Bram Stoker

    ###

    As we plug in, we might send charged birthday greetings to Franz Aepinus; he was born on this date in 1724. A mathematician, scientist, and natural philosopher, he is best known for his research, both theoretical and experimental, into electricity and magnetism. Aepinus’ Tentamen theoriae electricitatis et magnetismi (1759; “An Attempt at a Theory of Electricity and Magnetism”) was the first work to apply mathematics to the theory of electricity and magnetism. And his experiments led to the design of the parallel-plate capacitor, a device used to store energy in an electric field. 

    source

    #Aepinus #capacitor #climate #climateChange #culture #development #electricity #electrification #electrotech #Ember #energy #FranzAepinus #history #magnetism #Mathematics #politics #Science #Technology

  15. “There are things done today in electrical science which would have been deemed unholy by the very men who discovered electricity, who would themselves not so long before have been burned as wizards”*…

    Climate change continues. There is broad evidence (and consensus) that our environment, thus our ways of life, our livelihoods— indeed, our lives— are threatened. On the heels of a call from Trump to world leaders to abandon the climate fight, followed by a disappointing COP30 conference, it’s easy to be discouraged. But that, of course, is no answer.

    Rather, we have to find ways to mitigate the damage that we’ve already locked in, even as we acclerate a transition to clean energy… which begins by (re-)framing and (re-)focusing the challenge. Ember, a clean energy think tank, suggests a candidate that, while it speaks to the moral obligations addressed by one of the models it means to augment/replace, has a more positive orientation…

    Humanity is graduating from burning fossil commodities to harnessing manufactured technologies—from hunting scarce fossils to farming the inexhaustible sun, from consuming Earth’s resources to
    merely borrowing them.

    This isn’t a marginal climate substitution. It’s an energy revolution.

    The magnetic centre is the electron: we are revolutionising how we generate, use, and connect
    electrons. Solar and wind are conquering electricity supply. EVs, heat pumps, and AI are electrifying major new uses. Batteries and digitalisation are connecting supply and demand.

    Three reinforcing shifts. One energy revolution. The electrotech revolution.

    At its core, this revolution is driven by physics, economics, and geopolitics. After all, the arc of energy
    history bends towards solutions that are leaner, cheaper and more secure.

    Short-terms setbacks matter, but fundamentals matter more. And the fundamentals are stacked in electrotech’s favour.

    Physics. Electrotech makes a mockery of setting fossils on fire and losing two-thirds of the energy to heat. Electrotech is three times as efficient.

    Economics. Technologies get cheaper with scale. Commodities get more expensive the deeper you dig.

    Geopolitics. Three quarters of the world is dependent on fossil imports. 92% of countries have renewables potential over 10x their current demand.

    Electrotech has grown exponentially for decades. The difference today is that it’s too cheap to contain and too big to ignore. If current exponentials hold for five more years, global fossil demand will fall off its plateau.

    Welcome to the Age of Electrotech…

    A long and meaty presentation: “The Electrotech Revolution- the shape of things to come,” from @ember-energy.org.

    One notes that the electrification that Ember pushes has other advocates, many of whom have been vocal for years; c.f., e.g., Saul Griffin. Still, another voice in the chorus is welcome.

    * Bram Stoker

    ###

    As we plug in, we might send charged birthday greetings to Franz Aepinus; he was born on this date in 1724. A mathematician, scientist, and natural philosopher, he is best known for his research, both theoretical and experimental, into electricity and magnetism. Aepinus’ Tentamen theoriae electricitatis et magnetismi (1759; “An Attempt at a Theory of Electricity and Magnetism”) was the first work to apply mathematics to the theory of electricity and magnetism. And his experiments led to the design of the parallel-plate capacitor, a device used to store energy in an electric field. 

    source

    #Aepinus #capacitor #climate #climateChange #culture #development #electricity #electrification #electrotech #Ember #energy #FranzAepinus #history #magnetism #Mathematics #politics #Science #Technology

  16. “There are things done today in electrical science which would have been deemed unholy by the very men who discovered electricity, who would themselves not so long before have been burned as wizards”*…

    Climate change continues. There is broad evidence (and consensus) that our environment, thus our ways of life, our livelihoods— indeed, our lives— are threatened. On the heels of a call from Trump to world leaders to abandon the climate fight, followed by a disappointing COP30 conference, it’s easy to be discouraged. But that, of course, is no answer.

    Rather, we have to find ways to mitigate the damage that we’ve already locked in, even as we acclerate a transition to clean energy… which begins by (re-)framing and (re-)focusing the challenge. Ember, a clean energy think tank, suggests a candidate that, while it speaks to the moral obligations addressed by one of the models it means to augment/replace, has a more positive orientation…

    Humanity is graduating from burning fossil commodities to harnessing manufactured technologies—from hunting scarce fossils to farming the inexhaustible sun, from consuming Earth’s resources to
    merely borrowing them.

    This isn’t a marginal climate substitution. It’s an energy revolution.

    The magnetic centre is the electron: we are revolutionising how we generate, use, and connect
    electrons. Solar and wind are conquering electricity supply. EVs, heat pumps, and AI are electrifying major new uses. Batteries and digitalisation are connecting supply and demand.

    Three reinforcing shifts. One energy revolution. The electrotech revolution.

    At its core, this revolution is driven by physics, economics, and geopolitics. After all, the arc of energy
    history bends towards solutions that are leaner, cheaper and more secure.

    Short-terms setbacks matter, but fundamentals matter more. And the fundamentals are stacked in electrotech’s favour.

    Physics. Electrotech makes a mockery of setting fossils on fire and losing two-thirds of the energy to heat. Electrotech is three times as efficient.

    Economics. Technologies get cheaper with scale. Commodities get more expensive the deeper you dig.

    Geopolitics. Three quarters of the world is dependent on fossil imports. 92% of countries have renewables potential over 10x their current demand.

    Electrotech has grown exponentially for decades. The difference today is that it’s too cheap to contain and too big to ignore. If current exponentials hold for five more years, global fossil demand will fall off its plateau.

    Welcome to the Age of Electrotech…

    A long and meaty presentation: “The Electrotech Revolution- the shape of things to come,” from @ember-energy.org.

    One notes that the electrification that Ember pushes has other advocates, many of whom have been vocal for years; c.f., e.g., Saul Griffin. Still, another voice in the chorus is welcome.

    * Bram Stoker

    ###

    As we plug in, we might send charged birthday greetings to Franz Aepinus; he was born on this date in 1724. A mathematician, scientist, and natural philosopher, he is best known for his research, both theoretical and experimental, into electricity and magnetism. Aepinus’ Tentamen theoriae electricitatis et magnetismi (1759; “An Attempt at a Theory of Electricity and Magnetism”) was the first work to apply mathematics to the theory of electricity and magnetism. And his experiments led to the design of the parallel-plate capacitor, a device used to store energy in an electric field. 

    source

    #Aepinus #capacitor #climate #climateChange #culture #development #electricity #electrification #electrotech #Ember #energy #FranzAepinus #history #magnetism #Mathematics #politics #Science #Technology

  17. The Roman Cup That Acts Like a Mood Ring (and Predates Nanotech by 1,700 Years)

    The Lycurgus Cup changes color under different lighting due to nanoscale metal particles embedded in the glass (Credit: British Museum collection / Wikimedia Commons-style museum photography).

    Dear Cherubs, a Roman drinking cup has entered the chat from the 4th century and it is behaving suspiciously like it has opinions about lighting. Depending on how you shine it, it flips from green to glowing red like it’s trying out mood-ring cosplay long before mood rings were even a bad idea.

    A CUP THAT CAN’T PICK A SIDE
    Meet the famous Lycurgus Cup, a late Roman glass vessel usually dated to around the 4th century AD. In reflected light it appears greenish, but when light passes through it, it turns a deep ruby red. It’s not magic, not wizardry, and definitely not a Roman prank—though it does feel like something they would have done for fun.

    According to analyses carried out in the late 20th century, including work reported by the British Museum, this optical trick comes from microscopic particles embedded in the glass. And by “microscopic,” we’re talking on the scale of tens of nanometers. Yes, nanometers. In ancient Rome. The vibes are honestly a bit disrespectful to modern tech timelines.

    The cup depicts the myth of King Lycurgus tangled in vines—very dramatic, very extra—and yet the real drama is happening in the material itself.

    NANOTECH BEFORE IT WAS COOL
    Here’s where things get spicy. In studies conducted in the 1990s using electron microscopy, researchers found tiny particles of gold and silver dispersed in the glass, roughly around 50–100 nanometers in size. That’s the sweet spot where metals start messing with light in very specific ways, scattering wavelengths differently depending on whether light is reflected or transmitted.

    As noted in historical materials science discussions referenced by thisclaimer.com, this isn’t “nanotechnology” in the modern engineered sense—but it absolutely is nanostructure behavior. In other words, Romans weren’t calculating particle distributions on a whiteboard, but they did accidentally stumble into physics that engineers today still try to control deliberately.

    So how did they do it? Likely through impurities in metal dust used during glassmaking. Gold and silver particles, when suspended in glass, create what scientists call a dichroic effect. Fancy term, simple outcome: the cup is basically a tiny optical illusion generator.

    The key twist? They didn’t know why it worked. They just knew it looked expensive. Which, to be fair, is also how a lot of modern luxury tech is designed.

    Today, materials scientists study objects like the Lycurgus Cup to understand early accidental nanotechnology. It sits in the awkward historical category of “they absolutely didn’t mean to do this, but they did it anyway and now we’re impressed.”

    It also quietly challenges the idea that advanced material science is strictly modern. Humans have been experimenting with matter for millennia—we just got better at naming it later.

    So yes, this is a 1,600-year-old cup that changes color based on light. No, it is not a wizard artifact. But it does make you wonder what else ancient artisans stumbled into while just trying to make something look fancy for a banquet.

    Sources:
    British Museum Collection – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1958-1222-1
    Nature (materials science discussions on dichroic glass and nanoparticles) https://www.nature.com/
    Encyclopaedia Britannica – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lycurgus-Cup

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #ancientRome #ancientTechnology #archaeology #beauty #Europe #historicalArtifacts #lifestyle #lycurgusCup #materialsScience #Nanotechnology #news #opticalEffects #romanGlass #scienceHistory #travel #viral
  18. The Roman Cup That Acts Like a Mood Ring (and Predates Nanotech by 1,700 Years)

    The Lycurgus Cup changes color under different lighting due to nanoscale metal particles embedded in the glass (Credit: British Museum collection / Wikimedia Commons-style museum photography).

    Dear Cherubs, a Roman drinking cup has entered the chat from the 4th century and it is behaving suspiciously like it has opinions about lighting. Depending on how you shine it, it flips from green to glowing red like it’s trying out mood-ring cosplay long before mood rings were even a bad idea.

    A CUP THAT CAN’T PICK A SIDE
    Meet the famous Lycurgus Cup, a late Roman glass vessel usually dated to around the 4th century AD. In reflected light it appears greenish, but when light passes through it, it turns a deep ruby red. It’s not magic, not wizardry, and definitely not a Roman prank—though it does feel like something they would have done for fun.

    According to analyses carried out in the late 20th century, including work reported by the British Museum, this optical trick comes from microscopic particles embedded in the glass. And by “microscopic,” we’re talking on the scale of tens of nanometers. Yes, nanometers. In ancient Rome. The vibes are honestly a bit disrespectful to modern tech timelines.

    The cup depicts the myth of King Lycurgus tangled in vines—very dramatic, very extra—and yet the real drama is happening in the material itself.

    NANOTECH BEFORE IT WAS COOL
    Here’s where things get spicy. In studies conducted in the 1990s using electron microscopy, researchers found tiny particles of gold and silver dispersed in the glass, roughly around 50–100 nanometers in size. That’s the sweet spot where metals start messing with light in very specific ways, scattering wavelengths differently depending on whether light is reflected or transmitted.

    As noted in historical materials science discussions referenced by thisclaimer.com, this isn’t “nanotechnology” in the modern engineered sense—but it absolutely is nanostructure behavior. In other words, Romans weren’t calculating particle distributions on a whiteboard, but they did accidentally stumble into physics that engineers today still try to control deliberately.

    So how did they do it? Likely through impurities in metal dust used during glassmaking. Gold and silver particles, when suspended in glass, create what scientists call a dichroic effect. Fancy term, simple outcome: the cup is basically a tiny optical illusion generator.

    The key twist? They didn’t know why it worked. They just knew it looked expensive. Which, to be fair, is also how a lot of modern luxury tech is designed.

    Today, materials scientists study objects like the Lycurgus Cup to understand early accidental nanotechnology. It sits in the awkward historical category of “they absolutely didn’t mean to do this, but they did it anyway and now we’re impressed.”

    It also quietly challenges the idea that advanced material science is strictly modern. Humans have been experimenting with matter for millennia—we just got better at naming it later.

    So yes, this is a 1,600-year-old cup that changes color based on light. No, it is not a wizard artifact. But it does make you wonder what else ancient artisans stumbled into while just trying to make something look fancy for a banquet.

    Sources:
    British Museum Collection – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1958-1222-1
    Nature (materials science discussions on dichroic glass and nanoparticles) https://www.nature.com/
    Encyclopaedia Britannica – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lycurgus-Cup

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #ancientRome #ancientTechnology #archaeology #beauty #Europe #historicalArtifacts #lifestyle #lycurgusCup #materialsScience #Nanotechnology #news #opticalEffects #romanGlass #scienceHistory #travel #viral
  19. The Roman Cup That Acts Like a Mood Ring (and Predates Nanotech by 1,700 Years)

    The Lycurgus Cup changes color under different lighting due to nanoscale metal particles embedded in the glass (Credit: British Museum collection / Wikimedia Commons-style museum photography).

    Dear Cherubs, a Roman drinking cup has entered the chat from the 4th century and it is behaving suspiciously like it has opinions about lighting. Depending on how you shine it, it flips from green to glowing red like it’s trying out mood-ring cosplay long before mood rings were even a bad idea.

    A CUP THAT CAN’T PICK A SIDE
    Meet the famous Lycurgus Cup, a late Roman glass vessel usually dated to around the 4th century AD. In reflected light it appears greenish, but when light passes through it, it turns a deep ruby red. It’s not magic, not wizardry, and definitely not a Roman prank—though it does feel like something they would have done for fun.

    According to analyses carried out in the late 20th century, including work reported by the British Museum, this optical trick comes from microscopic particles embedded in the glass. And by “microscopic,” we’re talking on the scale of tens of nanometers. Yes, nanometers. In ancient Rome. The vibes are honestly a bit disrespectful to modern tech timelines.

    The cup depicts the myth of King Lycurgus tangled in vines—very dramatic, very extra—and yet the real drama is happening in the material itself.

    NANOTECH BEFORE IT WAS COOL
    Here’s where things get spicy. In studies conducted in the 1990s using electron microscopy, researchers found tiny particles of gold and silver dispersed in the glass, roughly around 50–100 nanometers in size. That’s the sweet spot where metals start messing with light in very specific ways, scattering wavelengths differently depending on whether light is reflected or transmitted.

    As noted in historical materials science discussions referenced by thisclaimer.com, this isn’t “nanotechnology” in the modern engineered sense—but it absolutely is nanostructure behavior. In other words, Romans weren’t calculating particle distributions on a whiteboard, but they did accidentally stumble into physics that engineers today still try to control deliberately.

    So how did they do it? Likely through impurities in metal dust used during glassmaking. Gold and silver particles, when suspended in glass, create what scientists call a dichroic effect. Fancy term, simple outcome: the cup is basically a tiny optical illusion generator.

    The key twist? They didn’t know why it worked. They just knew it looked expensive. Which, to be fair, is also how a lot of modern luxury tech is designed.

    Today, materials scientists study objects like the Lycurgus Cup to understand early accidental nanotechnology. It sits in the awkward historical category of “they absolutely didn’t mean to do this, but they did it anyway and now we’re impressed.”

    It also quietly challenges the idea that advanced material science is strictly modern. Humans have been experimenting with matter for millennia—we just got better at naming it later.

    So yes, this is a 1,600-year-old cup that changes color based on light. No, it is not a wizard artifact. But it does make you wonder what else ancient artisans stumbled into while just trying to make something look fancy for a banquet.

    Sources:
    British Museum Collection – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1958-1222-1
    Nature (materials science discussions on dichroic glass and nanoparticles) https://www.nature.com/
    Encyclopaedia Britannica – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lycurgus-Cup

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #ancientRome #ancientTechnology #archaeology #beauty #Europe #historicalArtifacts #lifestyle #lycurgusCup #materialsScience #Nanotechnology #news #opticalEffects #romanGlass #scienceHistory #travel #viral
  20. The Roman Cup That Acts Like a Mood Ring (and Predates Nanotech by 1,700 Years)

    The Lycurgus Cup changes color under different lighting due to nanoscale metal particles embedded in the glass (Credit: British Museum collection / Wikimedia Commons-style museum photography).

    Dear Cherubs, a Roman drinking cup has entered the chat from the 4th century and it is behaving suspiciously like it has opinions about lighting. Depending on how you shine it, it flips from green to glowing red like it’s trying out mood-ring cosplay long before mood rings were even a bad idea.

    A CUP THAT CAN’T PICK A SIDE
    Meet the famous Lycurgus Cup, a late Roman glass vessel usually dated to around the 4th century AD. In reflected light it appears greenish, but when light passes through it, it turns a deep ruby red. It’s not magic, not wizardry, and definitely not a Roman prank—though it does feel like something they would have done for fun.

    According to analyses carried out in the late 20th century, including work reported by the British Museum, this optical trick comes from microscopic particles embedded in the glass. And by “microscopic,” we’re talking on the scale of tens of nanometers. Yes, nanometers. In ancient Rome. The vibes are honestly a bit disrespectful to modern tech timelines.

    The cup depicts the myth of King Lycurgus tangled in vines—very dramatic, very extra—and yet the real drama is happening in the material itself.

    NANOTECH BEFORE IT WAS COOL
    Here’s where things get spicy. In studies conducted in the 1990s using electron microscopy, researchers found tiny particles of gold and silver dispersed in the glass, roughly around 50–100 nanometers in size. That’s the sweet spot where metals start messing with light in very specific ways, scattering wavelengths differently depending on whether light is reflected or transmitted.

    As noted in historical materials science discussions referenced by thisclaimer.com, this isn’t “nanotechnology” in the modern engineered sense—but it absolutely is nanostructure behavior. In other words, Romans weren’t calculating particle distributions on a whiteboard, but they did accidentally stumble into physics that engineers today still try to control deliberately.

    So how did they do it? Likely through impurities in metal dust used during glassmaking. Gold and silver particles, when suspended in glass, create what scientists call a dichroic effect. Fancy term, simple outcome: the cup is basically a tiny optical illusion generator.

    The key twist? They didn’t know why it worked. They just knew it looked expensive. Which, to be fair, is also how a lot of modern luxury tech is designed.

    Today, materials scientists study objects like the Lycurgus Cup to understand early accidental nanotechnology. It sits in the awkward historical category of “they absolutely didn’t mean to do this, but they did it anyway and now we’re impressed.”

    It also quietly challenges the idea that advanced material science is strictly modern. Humans have been experimenting with matter for millennia—we just got better at naming it later.

    So yes, this is a 1,600-year-old cup that changes color based on light. No, it is not a wizard artifact. But it does make you wonder what else ancient artisans stumbled into while just trying to make something look fancy for a banquet.

    Sources:
    British Museum Collection – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1958-1222-1
    Nature (materials science discussions on dichroic glass and nanoparticles) https://www.nature.com/
    Encyclopaedia Britannica – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lycurgus-Cup

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #ancientRome #ancientTechnology #archaeology #beauty #Europe #historicalArtifacts #lifestyle #lycurgusCup #materialsScience #Nanotechnology #news #opticalEffects #romanGlass #scienceHistory #travel #viral
  21. The Roman Cup That Acts Like a Mood Ring (and Predates Nanotech by 1,700 Years)

    The Lycurgus Cup changes color under different lighting due to nanoscale metal particles embedded in the glass (Credit: British Museum collection / Wikimedia Commons-style museum photography).

    Dear Cherubs, a Roman drinking cup has entered the chat from the 4th century and it is behaving suspiciously like it has opinions about lighting. Depending on how you shine it, it flips from green to glowing red like it’s trying out mood-ring cosplay long before mood rings were even a bad idea.

    A CUP THAT CAN’T PICK A SIDE
    Meet the famous Lycurgus Cup, a late Roman glass vessel usually dated to around the 4th century AD. In reflected light it appears greenish, but when light passes through it, it turns a deep ruby red. It’s not magic, not wizardry, and definitely not a Roman prank—though it does feel like something they would have done for fun.

    According to analyses carried out in the late 20th century, including work reported by the British Museum, this optical trick comes from microscopic particles embedded in the glass. And by “microscopic,” we’re talking on the scale of tens of nanometers. Yes, nanometers. In ancient Rome. The vibes are honestly a bit disrespectful to modern tech timelines.

    The cup depicts the myth of King Lycurgus tangled in vines—very dramatic, very extra—and yet the real drama is happening in the material itself.

    NANOTECH BEFORE IT WAS COOL
    Here’s where things get spicy. In studies conducted in the 1990s using electron microscopy, researchers found tiny particles of gold and silver dispersed in the glass, roughly around 50–100 nanometers in size. That’s the sweet spot where metals start messing with light in very specific ways, scattering wavelengths differently depending on whether light is reflected or transmitted.

    As noted in historical materials science discussions referenced by thisclaimer.com, this isn’t “nanotechnology” in the modern engineered sense—but it absolutely is nanostructure behavior. In other words, Romans weren’t calculating particle distributions on a whiteboard, but they did accidentally stumble into physics that engineers today still try to control deliberately.

    So how did they do it? Likely through impurities in metal dust used during glassmaking. Gold and silver particles, when suspended in glass, create what scientists call a dichroic effect. Fancy term, simple outcome: the cup is basically a tiny optical illusion generator.

    The key twist? They didn’t know why it worked. They just knew it looked expensive. Which, to be fair, is also how a lot of modern luxury tech is designed.

    Today, materials scientists study objects like the Lycurgus Cup to understand early accidental nanotechnology. It sits in the awkward historical category of “they absolutely didn’t mean to do this, but they did it anyway and now we’re impressed.”

    It also quietly challenges the idea that advanced material science is strictly modern. Humans have been experimenting with matter for millennia—we just got better at naming it later.

    So yes, this is a 1,600-year-old cup that changes color based on light. No, it is not a wizard artifact. But it does make you wonder what else ancient artisans stumbled into while just trying to make something look fancy for a banquet.

    Sources:
    British Museum Collection – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1958-1222-1
    Nature (materials science discussions on dichroic glass and nanoparticles) https://www.nature.com/
    Encyclopaedia Britannica – Lycurgus Cup https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lycurgus-Cup

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #ancientRome #ancientTechnology #archaeology #beauty #Europe #historicalArtifacts #lifestyle #lycurgusCup #materialsScience #Nanotechnology #news #opticalEffects #romanGlass #scienceHistory #travel #viral
  22. "- Could someone have hacked into the system?
    - Not your average phone freak, for sure. But there's plenty of kooks out there. Data travellers, electro wizards, techno anarchists. Anything's possible."

    (#XFiles s1e7, Ghost in the Machine)

    #TVQuotes

  23. The Capitals and the Wizards may not win another championship anytime soon, but they will continue playing their home games where they should: in the downtown arena they’ve called home since 1997 as first the MCI Center, then the Verizon Center, followed by the resulting nickname of the Phone Booth, and now Capital One Arena.

    That’s the best possible resolution of an interlude in which Monumental Sports and Entertainment had committed to relocating both teams to a new arena to be built in Alexandria’s Potomac Yard neighborhood. The Dec. 13 news of that move seemed driven from the start not by fundamental flaws with the teams’ Gallery Place venue, placed atop three Metro lines, but by Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R.) wanting to secure a political legacy.

    Having failed to capitalize on his election in 2021 with durable policy achievements–and having just seen Republicans lose a narrow majority in the state senate and return the General Assembly to Democratic control–Youngkin jumped at the chance to invite Monumental owner Ted Leonsis to bring the Caps and the Wizards across the Potomac.

    Leonsis saw the chance to stop worrying about crime and noise outside Capital One Arena and build a sports and entertainment district from scratch with the help of $1.35 billion in subsidies, so of course he accepted that handshake deal.

    Alexandrians I know were not nearly as enthusiastic about the prospect of a 20,000-seat venue being plunked down in their midst and what that might mean for traffic and Metro. Democratic leaders in Richmond, meanwhile, revealed themselves comparably skeptical of a financing plan that advertised no downside for Virginia taxpayers but which banked on assumptions that included moving Georgetown basketball games and dozens of concerts to the new arena and having people pay as much as $75 for parking and $731 a night for nearby luxury hotel rooms to generate the taxes to cover those subsidies.

    Weeks of Youngkin treating the General Assembly as if it were a lower-level occupant on the org chart at the Carlyle Group, the private-equity firm that made him exceptionally rich, did not advance his arena ambitions. And now with Monumental signing a “strategic partnership” Wednesday with the District to upgrade Capital One Arena and its surroundings–backed by $515 million in public funds–they’re officially defunct.

    Which is good, because I didn’t like the thought of redoing the experiment of having our NBA and NHL franchises playing outside of the city center. The Alexandria arena would have at least been next to a Metro stop and next to a walkable neighborhood, unlike the Capital Centre in Landover that introduced me to Georgetown hoops without ever earning any nostalgia from me. But when it had been such an unambiguously good idea to move the D.C. area’s biggest arena to the heart of the District–and when so many other places have seen good things happen when they moved their arenas to their city centers–why would you want to go back on that even a little bit?

    https://robpegoraro.com/2024/03/29/city-sized-arenas-belong-in-city-centers/

    #CapOneArena #CapitalCentre #CapitalOneArena #Caps #GalleryPlace #Hoyas #Landover #MCICenter #NationalLanding #NHL #PhoneBooth #PotomacYard #USAirArena #VerizonCenter #Wizards

  24. The Capitals and the Wizards may not win another championship anytime soon, but they will continue playing their home games where they should: in the downtown arena they’ve called home since 1997 as first the MCI Center, then the Verizon Center, followed by the resulting nickname of the Phone Booth, and now Capital One Arena.

    That’s the best possible resolution of an interlude in which Monumental Sports and Entertainment had committed to relocating both teams to a new arena to be built in Alexandria’s Potomac Yard neighborhood. The Dec. 13 news of that move seemed driven from the start not by fundamental flaws with the teams’ Gallery Place venue, placed atop three Metro lines, but by Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R.) wanting to secure a political legacy.

    Having failed to capitalize on his election in 2021 with durable policy achievements–and having just seen Republicans lose a narrow majority in the state senate and return the General Assembly to Democratic control–Youngkin jumped at the chance to invite Monumental owner Ted Leonsis to bring the Caps and the Wizards across the Potomac.

    Leonsis saw the chance to stop worrying about crime and noise outside Capital One Arena and build a sports and entertainment district from scratch with the help of $1.35 billion in subsidies, so of course he accepted that handshake deal.

    Alexandrians I know were not nearly as enthusiastic about the prospect of a 20,000-seat venue being plunked down in their midst and what that might mean for traffic and Metro. Democratic leaders in Richmond, meanwhile, revealed themselves comparably skeptical of a financing plan that advertised no downside for Virginia taxpayers but which banked on assumptions that included moving Georgetown basketball games and dozens of concerts to the new arena and having people pay as much as $75 for parking and $731 a night for nearby luxury hotel rooms to generate the taxes to cover those subsidies.

    Weeks of Youngkin treating the General Assembly as if it were a lower-level occupant on the org chart at the Carlyle Group, the private-equity firm that made him exceptionally rich, did not advance his arena ambitions. And now with Monumental signing a “strategic partnership” Wednesday with the District to upgrade Capital One Arena and its surroundings–backed by $515 million in public funds–they’re officially defunct.

    Which is good, because I didn’t like the thought of redoing the experiment of having our NBA and NHL franchises playing outside of the city center. The Alexandria arena would have at least been next to a Metro stop and next to a walkable neighborhood, unlike the Capital Centre in Landover that introduced me to Georgetown hoops without ever earning any nostalgia from me. But when it had been such an unambiguously good idea to move the D.C. area’s biggest arena to the heart of the District–and when so many other places have seen good things happen when they moved their arenas to their city centers–why would you want to go back on that even a little bit?

    https://robpegoraro.com/2024/03/29/city-sized-arenas-belong-in-city-centers/

    #CapOneArena #CapitalCentre #CapitalOneArena #Caps #GalleryPlace #Hoyas #Landover #MCICenter #NationalLanding #NHL #PhoneBooth #PotomacYard #USAirArena #VerizonCenter #Wizards

  25. The Capitals and the Wizards may not win another championship anytime soon, but they will continue playing their home games where they should: in the downtown arena they’ve called home since 1997 as first the MCI Center, then the Verizon Center, followed by the resulting nickname of the Phone Booth, and now Capital One Arena.

    That’s the best possible resolution of an interlude in which Monumental Sports and Entertainment had committed to relocating both teams to a new arena to be built in Alexandria’s Potomac Yard neighborhood. The Dec. 13 news of that move seemed driven from the start not by fundamental flaws with the teams’ Gallery Place venue, placed atop three Metro lines, but by Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R.) wanting to secure a political legacy.

    Having failed to capitalize on his election in 2021 with durable policy achievements–and having just seen Republicans lose a narrow majority in the state senate and return the General Assembly to Democratic control–Youngkin jumped at the chance to invite Monumental owner Ted Leonsis to bring the Caps and the Wizards across the Potomac.

    Leonsis saw the chance to stop worrying about crime and noise outside Capital One Arena and build a sports and entertainment district from scratch with the help of $1.35 billion in subsidies, so of course he accepted that handshake deal.

    Alexandrians I know were not nearly as enthusiastic about the prospect of a 20,000-seat venue being plunked down in their midst and what that might mean for traffic and Metro. Democratic leaders in Richmond, meanwhile, revealed themselves comparably skeptical of a financing plan that advertised no downside for Virginia taxpayers but which banked on assumptions that included moving Georgetown basketball games and dozens of concerts to the new arena and having people pay as much as $75 for parking and $731 a night for nearby luxury hotel rooms to generate the taxes to cover those subsidies.

    Weeks of Youngkin treating the General Assembly as if it were a lower-level occupant on the org chart at the Carlyle Group, the private-equity firm that made him exceptionally rich, did not advance his arena ambitions. And now with Monumental signing a “strategic partnership” Wednesday with the District to upgrade Capital One Arena and its surroundings–backed by $515 million in public funds–they’re officially defunct.

    Which is good, because I didn’t like the thought of redoing the experiment of having our NBA and NHL franchises playing outside of the city center. The Alexandria arena would have at least been next to a Metro stop and next to a walkable neighborhood, unlike the Capital Centre in Landover that introduced me to Georgetown hoops without ever earning any nostalgia from me. But when it had been such an unambiguously good idea to move the D.C. area’s biggest arena to the heart of the District–and when so many other places have seen good things happen when they moved their arenas to their city centers–why would you want to go back on that even a little bit?

    https://robpegoraro.com/2024/03/29/city-sized-arenas-belong-in-city-centers/

    #CapOneArena #CapitalCentre #CapitalOneArena #Caps #GalleryPlace #Hoyas #Landover #MCICenter #NationalLanding #NHL #PhoneBooth #PotomacYard #USAirArena #VerizonCenter #Wizards

  26. Finally Friday Reads: The Chaos Times

    “It’s now safe to go out to dinner in The Nation’s Capital!” John Buss, @repeat1968

    Good Day, Sky Dancers!

    The chaos surrounding voting rights continues to play out across many southern states. I’ve shared the craziness going on down here in Lousyana. It seems today’s news on voting rights and gerrymandering shenanigans were handled by Supreme Court judges in Virginia. It’s looking like Orange Caligula and his Republican enablers will be getting the Midterm Election chaos they seek. Our primary election is coming up in 8 days. Our U.S. Congressional representatives are not on the ballot as they should be.

    Will the Virginia Supreme Court Decision impact more than just Virginia?  That seems to be the question being asked in the national conversation. David  A. Lieb  and Geoff Mulvihill report the story for the AP. “Virginia Supreme Court strikes down Democrats’ redrawn US House maps, giving Republicans a win.” It’s difficult to believe that so much disruption can happen in modern times.

    The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved Democratic congressional redistricting plan, delivering another major setback to the party in a nationwide battle against Republicans for an edge in this year’s midterm elections.

    The court ruled 4-3 that the state’s Democratic-led legislature violated procedural requirements when it placed the constitutional amendment on the ballot to authorize the mid-decade redistricting. Voters narrowly approved the amendment April 21, but the court’s ruling renders the results of that vote meaningless.

    Writing for the majority, Justice D. Arthur Kelsey wrote that the legislature submitted the proposed constitutional amendment to voters “in an unprecedented manner.”

    “This violation irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void,” he wrote.

    Democrats had hoped to win as many as four additional U.S. House seats under Virginia’s redrawn U.S. House map as part of an attempt to offset Republican redistricting done elsewhere at the urging of President Donald Trump. That ruling, combined with a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision severely weakening the Voting Rights Act, has supercharged the Republicans’ congressional gerrymandering advantage heading into this year’s midterm elections.

    Redistricting could change the House Map. This is the next question the article addresses.

    Mid-decade redistricting so far has resulted in 14 more congressional seats that Republicans believe they could win and six more seats that Democrats think they could win, putting the GOP up by eight. But some of those seats could be competitive in the November election, making the results uncertain. Redistricting is still being litigated in several states.

    There is a map showing the general changes that have occurred following the Supreme Court decision, which has disrupted the entire concept of gerrymandering and its illegality. The Guardian reports today on the situation in Tennessee, which could eliminate its one black majority Congressional seat. We worry about that here in Louisiana. “Tennessee Republicans redraw maps to erase last Democratic, Black-majority district. Move comes days after supreme court ruling weakened Voting Rights Act protections against racial gerrymandering.” George Chidi has the analysis.

    Tennessee’s Republican-dominated legislature passed redistricting maps on Thursday, eliminating the state’s one Democratic, Black-majority congressional district a week after the US supreme court effectively gutted a major section of the Voting Rights Act.

    The move cracks Tennessee’s ninth congressional district, which covers Memphis, into three pieces, each of which contains almost exactly a third of the city’s Black voters. The new maps mean that all nine of Tennessee’s congressional districts are Republican-leaning.

    The district had closely occupied the south-west corner of the state. Now three districts snake out from Memphis’ dense center, with two crossing the Tennessee River to reach Nashville’s suburbs 200 miles away.

    “If Republican policies are so great, why are we changing the lines to rig elections?” asked Vincent Dixie, a state representative from Nashville, during debate on Thursday, pleading for Republicans to refrain. “Where is your humanity in this?”

    As Democratic lawmakers spoke, the house speaker directed state troopers to remove a section of the audience in the gallery, which had begun shouting.

    Justin Jones, a state Democratic representative, described Cameron Sexton, the Tennessee house speaker, as the “grand wizard in chief”, and handed a Republican lawmaker a Confederate flag. Jones offered amendments to the bill, which the speaker ruled had been submitted in an untimely manner. Jones described that as a “Jim Crow process”.

    The redistricting comes eight days after the supreme court’s landmark Callais v Landry decision, which invalidated swaths of the Voting Rights Act which had restrained state governments from drawing congressional districts that left Black voters at a political disadvantage.

    Despite demands from Donald Trump for conservative states to conduct mid-decade redistricting, Tennessee had refrained from taking action before the court’s ruling. But Sexton said the redraw will “ensure the state’s representation in Washington reflects its conservative values”.

    Khaya Himmelman has more information about the Virginia situation in Talking Points Memo. “Virginia State Supreme Court Strikes Down Dem Redistricting Proposal.”

    In a major loss for Democrats on Friday, the Virginia state Supreme Court rejected, in a 4-3 decision, the state’s recently approved redistricting proposal, which could have given Democrats four additional congressional seats, improving their chances of taking control of the U.S. House this year.

    The proposal, which was introduced as a way to offset the impact of the Trump administration’s mid-cycle gerrymandering blitz, was narrowly approved by voters in a special election earlier this month.

    The Supreme Court ruled that the process by which lawmakers moved forward the redistricting proposal violated the state’s constitution.

    “In this case, the Commonwealth submitted a proposed constitutional amendment to Virginia voters in an unprecedented manner that violated the intervening-election requirement in Article XII, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia,” the state Supreme Court’s majority opinion read.

    “This violation irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void,” it continued. “For this reason, the congressional district maps issued by this Court in 2021 pursuant to Article II, Section 6-A of the Constitution of Virginia remain the governing maps for the upcoming 2026 congressional elections.”

    Election analysts underscored that this is a major victory for Republicans, though the political environment could still be a considerable drag on their midterms changes.

    G. Elliott Morris has an analysis up today that breaks down the statistical assumptions the Supreme Court used.  This comes from his site Strength in Numbers. “The simple statistical error Republican Supreme Court justices used to gut the VRA. The Court says vote dilution can be proven only after controlling for “controlling” racial polarization rather than partisan polarization. This is a nonsensical and impossible test.” For a kid who hated her algebra classes, I sure live in the realm of statistical and econometric analysis now. It helps to understand the numbers, believe me.

    The six Republican-appointed justices on the United States Supreme Court have found a magical solution to political polarization. All you have to do is take a partisan election result and subtract out the effects of party loyalty on the result.

    That, more or less, is what the Court wrote when it invalidated the Voting Rights Act last week. In Louisiana v. Callais, decided 6-3 on April 29, 2026, the conservative majority told voting-rights plaintiffs they must now “control for party affiliation” before their evidence of racial bloc voting will count under Section 2.

    That sounds like a neutral statistical fix, but in reality, it’s a bad control — an error called “conditioning on a mediator variable“ that would get your paper sent back to you with lots of red ink in statistics 101. The problem is that in modern America, party isn’t a variable that operates independently of race. Rather, political party is largely downstream of one’s race. If you subtract the effects of political party from the analysis of polarization, you are subtracting away the very evidence of polarization you are trying to study!

    This is important (not just a piece for nerds) because Republican legislatures are already moving ahead with new partisan and racial gerrymanders based on SCOTUS’s new theory. Tennessee passed a 9-0 GOP map this week that splits Memphis’s majority-Black and solidly Democratic 9th District into three majority-white, Republican-leaning seats. Mississippi’s governor has called a special session for May 20. Louisiana is losing at least one of its majority-Black districts. And Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina could be next. (On this week’s podcast, David and I recap these new gerrymandering efforts that are unfolding with unprecedented haste.)

    This week’s Chart of the Week is: a simple table (and one causal diagram) that shows how the Court’s new test makes racial polarization vanish on paper, while it is very much still alive in real life.

    This is the decision that will dilute the vote of New Orleans and every black citizen of Louisiana. Again, here’s the link to the Governor’s site announcing the decision to gerrymander the state prior to voting for our Congressional Representatives. “Governor Jeff Landry Suspends Only U.S. House Primary Elections Following Supreme Court Ruling.”  My mind boggles every time I read anything on this.

    Governor Jeff Landry issued an executive order suspending Louisiana’s closed party primary elections only for offices of U.S. Representative in response to the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Louisiana v. CallaisEO attached.

    “The best way to end race-based discrimination is to stop making decisions based on race,” said Governor Jeff Landry. “Here in Louisiana, we’re proud to lead the nation on this charge. Allowing elections to proceed under an unconstitutional map would undermine the integrity of our system and violate the rights of our voters. This executive order ensures we uphold the rule of law while giving the Legislature the time it needs to pass a fair and lawful congressional map. I would like to thank Attorney General Liz Murrill for her hard work throughout this process”

    The ruling issued on April 29 found Louisiana’s current congressional district map, enacted under SB 8 during the 2024 First Extraordinary Session, to be an unconstitutional gerrymander. The decision effectively reinstates a lower court injunction prohibiting the state from conducting congressional elections under the invalidated map.

    As a result, the state’s closed party primary elections for U.S. House seats, previously scheduled for May 16, 2026, and the second primary set for June 27, 2026, are suspended. Early voting for the May election was set to begin May 2. Other offices and ballot measures scheduled for May 16 will continue as planned. This suspension will only apply to the U.S. House races.

    I do feel like I’ve been disenfranchised. And again, please remember the impact the SAVE Act will have on Women and Transexual individuals. Democracy Docket has this analysis of the Tennessee situation. “‘Jim Crow on steroids’: Tennessee gerrymander included nixing rule that voters must be notified about new districts.” The analysis is provided by Jacob Knutson.

    In the aggressive congressional gerrymander they adopted Thursday, Tennessee Republicans also removed a provision in state law requiring the government to alert voters about changes to their designated polling places when electoral lines are redrawn.

    Transparency groups and state lawmakers have warned that the change is likely to exacerbate voter confusion caused by state Republicans’ abrupt adoption of new congressional maps just months before the 2026 midterm elections.

    One leading democracy advocate called it “Jim Crow on  steroids.”

    Before Thursday, state law required county election commissions to “immediately” notify voters by mail when their polling place or precinct changed because of redistricting. Among other notices, alerts also had to be published in newspapers. The law was meant to ensure that voters know where to cast their ballots during early voting or on election day.

    But in their bill repealing a five-decade prohibition on mid-decade redistricting, Republicans included an amendment that only requires county election commissions to post a notice about redrawn congressional districts on their “official website, if one exists.”

    Under the repeal, which is expected to be signed into law by Gov. Bill Lee (R), the secretary of state also has to publish a notice, but mail and newspaper notices are no longer required to inform voters about changed boundaries.

    Deborah Fisher, the executive director of the Tennessee Coalition for Open Government (TCOG), a nonpartisan transparency group, said in a release Thursday that the change was likely meant to reduce costs, though she warned that the voting public will be harmed when it takes effect.

    “When polling places or precincts are changed, more effort should be made to reach affected voters, not less,” Fisher said.

    Republicans had to repeal the prohibition on mid-decade redistricting before they pushed through their new congressional map, which cracks the state’s only majority-Black district between three separate districts.

    Because of the new map, several local voting areas were shifted into new congressional districts. That means polling places likely changed for hundreds of voters across the state.

    While debating the map in the Tennessee Senate Thursday, Sen. Heidi Campbell, a Democrat who represents Nashville, accused Republicans of intentionally misleading voters through the notice change.

    “We’re not just redrawing the map. We’re making sure people don’t have to be told the map changed,” Campbell said.

    Reacting to the notice change Thursday, Norman Ornstein, a prominent political scientist formerly with the American Enterprise Institute, called it “Jim Crow on steroids” in a social media post.

    It’s clear to me that we really have something to worry about. We’re busy here in Greater New Orleans with actions. Please consider finding out how you can help our country’s voting system.

    What’s on your Reading, Action, and Blogging list today?

     

    #GerryMandering #JimCrowOnSteroids #Louisiana #LouisianaVCallais #SupremeCourt #Tennesse #Virginia #votingRights
  27. Modder – Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun Review

    By Grin Reaper

    Blending sludge metal and electronica make for fascinating bedfellows, and that’s exactly what instrumental outfit Modder brings to the table with Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun. I don’t recall encountering this genre combo before, but the unlikely pairing fits together in compelling and novel ways. Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is one part early Mastodon and one part The Prodigy, and it works better in practice than I’d ever expect it to on paper. Both styles embrace the bottom end, and in a live setting, I imagine Modder is unapologetically crushing. But it takes more than novelty to guarantee a grand time, so let’s dig in and see what goodies this Belgian quintet serves up.1

    Though third outing Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun unites sludge and dance, it wasn’t always so, as Modder has evolved with each release. On their self-titled debut, Modder trod the well-worn doom path with low-end crunch and abundant fuzz, recalling Sleep and Electric Wizard. Sophomore album The Great Liberation Through Hearing injected quicker paces and subdued attitudes, delivering a rich variety of textures that plays like Inter Arma sans vocals. Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun continues the evolution of Modder’s sound, this time embracing dance-ready pulses and electronic trappings that occasionally approach Fear Factory’s Remanufacture (“Chaoism”). It’s a direction hinted at on The Great Liberation Through Hearing, but here Modder triumphs in fully fleshing it out.

    On Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun, Modder succeeds in evoking an assortment of influences while maintaining the band’s distinct identity. From the Korn-fed intro of “Stone Eternal” to the Gojira-glazed grooves of “In the Sun,” the album packs a broad range of sounds into its forty-two minutes. Each one of the album’s six tracks brings unerringly heavy riffs. “Mather” begins with a Prodigy-induced flourish, then drops into a disgustingly dense lurch that shakes the room like a herd of mammoths tromping past. Guitars, bass, and electronics weave an intricate tapestry, with melodies and countermelodies coalescing into grooves thicker than a bowl of oatmeal (“Stone Eternal,” “Mutant Body Double”). The drumming flits and hammers, with actual and programmed drums enabling quick shifts between sludge and breakbeat (“Chaoism”). This five-piece flaunts chops, and they pack them into an easily digestible package.

    Even if Modder’s latest is a barrel of fun, its imperfections hold it back from greener pastures. For starters, the mix is distractingly crowded. I suspect the goal was to create a concussive bombshell that rattles listeners to the core. While effective on that front, there are times when the sludgy crunch warps into over-compressed artifacts (“Stone Eternal,” “Mather”). This may be a challenge with the merger of styles, where the electronic elements don’t require the auditory depth needed to express the timbre of acoustic drums or bass. Instead, the music gets rammed through the aural equivalent of Fat Man’s Squeeze, coming out the other side flat and jarring. Another issue with Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is immediacy. Both sludge and dance emanate a hypnotic sheen onto their styles, whether through towering, droning riffs or persistent electro-throbs. This makes great music for focusing on other tasks, but rarely did I stay engaged for an entire listen. If the goal is to surpass the novelty of instrumental electrosludge, something more is needed. As it is, Modder has strung together fun moments without enough cohesion. If you remove one of the songs or reorder them, the end result doesn’t change substantially, indicating that the whole is no greater than the sum of its parts.

    Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is a study in cross-genre pollination that bears fruit worth sampling, but won’t sustain you for long. I really like the idea of what Modder has concocted, but the album would have benefited from further refinement. A more dynamic mix would immediately boost listenability, and upping their songwriting game could help push their brand of electrosludge past the point of novelty and into territory with more active engagement and longevity. Modder oozes potential, but there’s ultimately not enough on Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun to keep me coming back.

    Rating: Mixed
    DR: 5 | Format Reviewed: 320 kpbs mp3
    Label: Consouling Sounds / Lay Bare Recordings
    Websites: Bandcamp | Facebook
    Releases Worldwide: October 3rd, 2025

    #25 #2025 #BelgiumMetal #ConSoulingSounds #ConsoulingSoundsRecords #DestroyingOurselvesForAPlaceInTheSun #ElectricWizard #ElectronicDanceMusic #ElectronicMetal #Electronica #ElectronicaMetal #Electrosludge #FearFactory #Gojira #InstrumentalMetal #InterArma #Korn #LayBareRecordings #Mastodon #Modder #Oct25 #Prodigy #Psychedelic #Review #Reviews #Sleep #Sludge #SludgeMetal #TheProdigy

  28. Modder – Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun Review

    By Grin Reaper

    Blending sludge metal and electronica make for fascinating bedfellows, and that’s exactly what instrumental outfit Modder brings to the table with Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun. I don’t recall encountering this genre combo before, but the unlikely pairing fits together in compelling and novel ways. Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is one part early Mastodon and one part The Prodigy, and it works better in practice than I’d ever expect it to on paper. Both styles embrace the bottom end, and in a live setting, I imagine Modder is unapologetically crushing. But it takes more than novelty to guarantee a grand time, so let’s dig in and see what goodies this Belgian quintet serves up.1

    Though third outing Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun unites sludge and dance, it wasn’t always so, as Modder has evolved with each release. On their self-titled debut, Modder trod the well-worn doom path with low-end crunch and abundant fuzz, recalling Sleep and Electric Wizard. Sophomore album The Great Liberation Through Hearing injected quicker paces and subdued attitudes, delivering a rich variety of textures that plays like Inter Arma sans vocals. Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun continues the evolution of Modder’s sound, this time embracing dance-ready pulses and electronic trappings that occasionally approach Fear Factory’s Remanufacture (“Chaoism”). It’s a direction hinted at on The Great Liberation Through Hearing, but here Modder triumphs in fully fleshing it out.

    On Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun, Modder succeeds in evoking an assortment of influences while maintaining the band’s distinct identity. From the Korn-fed intro of “Stone Eternal” to the Gojira-glazed grooves of “In the Sun,” the album packs a broad range of sounds into its forty-two minutes. Each one of the album’s six tracks brings unerringly heavy riffs. “Mather” begins with a Prodigy-induced flourish, then drops into a disgustingly dense lurch that shakes the room like a herd of mammoths tromping past. Guitars, bass, and electronics weave an intricate tapestry, with melodies and countermelodies coalescing into grooves thicker than a bowl of oatmeal (“Stone Eternal,” “Mutant Body Double”). The drumming flits and hammers, with actual and programmed drums enabling quick shifts between sludge and breakbeat (“Chaoism”). This five-piece flaunts chops, and they pack them into an easily digestible package.

    Even if Modder’s latest is a barrel of fun, its imperfections hold it back from greener pastures. For starters, the mix is distractingly crowded. I suspect the goal was to create a concussive bombshell that rattles listeners to the core. While effective on that front, there are times when the sludgy crunch warps into over-compressed artifacts (“Stone Eternal,” “Mather”). This may be a challenge with the merger of styles, where the electronic elements don’t require the auditory depth needed to express the timbre of acoustic drums or bass. Instead, the music gets rammed through the aural equivalent of Fat Man’s Squeeze, coming out the other side flat and jarring. Another issue with Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is immediacy. Both sludge and dance emanate a hypnotic sheen onto their styles, whether through towering, droning riffs or persistent electro-throbs. This makes great music for focusing on other tasks, but rarely did I stay engaged for an entire listen. If the goal is to surpass the novelty of instrumental electrosludge, something more is needed. As it is, Modder has strung together fun moments without enough cohesion. If you remove one of the songs or reorder them, the end result doesn’t change substantially, indicating that the whole is no greater than the sum of its parts.

    Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is a study in cross-genre pollination that bears fruit worth sampling, but won’t sustain you for long. I really like the idea of what Modder has concocted, but the album would have benefited from further refinement. A more dynamic mix would immediately boost listenability, and upping their songwriting game could help push their brand of electrosludge past the point of novelty and into territory with more active engagement and longevity. Modder oozes potential, but there’s ultimately not enough on Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun to keep me coming back.

    Rating: Mixed
    DR: 5 | Format Reviewed: 320 kpbs mp3
    Label: Consouling Sounds / Lay Bare Recordings
    Websites: Bandcamp | Facebook
    Releases Worldwide: October 3rd, 2025

    #25 #2025 #BelgiumMetal #ConSoulingSounds #ConsoulingSoundsRecords #DestroyingOurselvesForAPlaceInTheSun #ElectricWizard #ElectronicDanceMusic #ElectronicMetal #Electronica #ElectronicaMetal #Electrosludge #FearFactory #Gojira #InstrumentalMetal #InterArma #Korn #LayBareRecordings #Mastodon #Modder #Oct25 #Prodigy #Psychedelic #Review #Reviews #Sleep #Sludge #SludgeMetal #TheProdigy

  29. Modder – Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun Review

    By Grin Reaper

    Blending sludge metal and electronica make for fascinating bedfellows, and that’s exactly what instrumental outfit Modder brings to the table with Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun. I don’t recall encountering this genre combo before, but the unlikely pairing fits together in compelling and novel ways. Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is one part early Mastodon and one part The Prodigy, and it works better in practice than I’d ever expect it to on paper. Both styles embrace the bottom end, and in a live setting, I imagine Modder is unapologetically crushing. But it takes more than novelty to guarantee a grand time, so let’s dig in and see what goodies this Belgian quintet serves up.1

    Though third outing Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun unites sludge and dance, it wasn’t always so, as Modder has evolved with each release. On their self-titled debut, Modder trod the well-worn doom path with low-end crunch and abundant fuzz, recalling Sleep and Electric Wizard. Sophomore album The Great Liberation Through Hearing injected quicker paces and subdued attitudes, delivering a rich variety of textures that plays like Inter Arma sans vocals. Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun continues the evolution of Modder’s sound, this time embracing dance-ready pulses and electronic trappings that occasionally approach Fear Factory’s Remanufacture (“Chaoism”). It’s a direction hinted at on The Great Liberation Through Hearing, but here Modder triumphs in fully fleshing it out.

    On Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun, Modder succeeds in evoking an assortment of influences while maintaining the band’s distinct identity. From the Korn-fed intro of “Stone Eternal” to the Gojira-glazed grooves of “In the Sun,” the album packs a broad range of sounds into its forty-two minutes. Each one of the album’s six tracks brings unerringly heavy riffs. “Mather” begins with a Prodigy-induced flourish, then drops into a disgustingly dense lurch that shakes the room like a herd of mammoths tromping past. Guitars, bass, and electronics weave an intricate tapestry, with melodies and countermelodies coalescing into grooves thicker than a bowl of oatmeal (“Stone Eternal,” “Mutant Body Double”). The drumming flits and hammers, with actual and programmed drums enabling quick shifts between sludge and breakbeat (“Chaoism”). This five-piece flaunts chops, and they pack them into an easily digestible package.

    Even if Modder’s latest is a barrel of fun, its imperfections hold it back from greener pastures. For starters, the mix is distractingly crowded. I suspect the goal was to create a concussive bombshell that rattles listeners to the core. While effective on that front, there are times when the sludgy crunch warps into over-compressed artifacts (“Stone Eternal,” “Mather”). This may be a challenge with the merger of styles, where the electronic elements don’t require the auditory depth needed to express the timbre of acoustic drums or bass. Instead, the music gets rammed through the aural equivalent of Fat Man’s Squeeze, coming out the other side flat and jarring. Another issue with Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is immediacy. Both sludge and dance emanate a hypnotic sheen onto their styles, whether through towering, droning riffs or persistent electro-throbs. This makes great music for focusing on other tasks, but rarely did I stay engaged for an entire listen. If the goal is to surpass the novelty of instrumental electrosludge, something more is needed. As it is, Modder has strung together fun moments without enough cohesion. If you remove one of the songs or reorder them, the end result doesn’t change substantially, indicating that the whole is no greater than the sum of its parts.

    Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun is a study in cross-genre pollination that bears fruit worth sampling, but won’t sustain you for long. I really like the idea of what Modder has concocted, but the album would have benefited from further refinement. A more dynamic mix would immediately boost listenability, and upping their songwriting game could help push their brand of electrosludge past the point of novelty and into territory with more active engagement and longevity. Modder oozes potential, but there’s ultimately not enough on Destroying Ourselves for a Place in the Sun to keep me coming back.

    Rating: Mixed
    DR: 5 | Format Reviewed: 320 kpbs mp3
    Label: Consouling Sounds / Lay Bare Recordings
    Websites: Bandcamp | Facebook
    Releases Worldwide: October 3rd, 2025

    #25 #2025 #BelgiumMetal #ConSoulingSounds #ConsoulingSoundsRecords #DestroyingOurselvesForAPlaceInTheSun #ElectricWizard #ElectronicDanceMusic #ElectronicMetal #Electronica #ElectronicaMetal #Electrosludge #FearFactory #Gojira #InstrumentalMetal #InterArma #Korn #LayBareRecordings #Mastodon #Modder #Oct25 #Prodigy #Psychedelic #Review #Reviews #Sleep #Sludge #SludgeMetal #TheProdigy