13 results for “hatr”
Israeli Channel 14: Factory of hatred against Palestinians
In recent years, it has become undeniably clear just how powerful media platforms are in shaping public opinion…
#EuropeSays #Headlines #News #Europe #Europa #EU #Israel #channel14 #genocide #Journalism #Palestine #Zionism
https://www.europesays.com/iran/325419/
https://www.europesays.com/iran/325419/ Israeli Channel 14: Factory of hatred against Palestinians #Channel14 #genocide #Israel #Journalism #Palestine #Zionism
https://www.europesays.com/people/262727/ Israeli Channel 14: Factory of hatred against Palestinians #BenjaminNetanyahu #Channel14 #Genocide #Israel #journalism #Palestine #Zionism
PURE GOLD ~ Inevitably, wanting to be loved and needed by others all the time results in suppressing uncomfortable emotions. Rage, hatred, bitterness, agitation, grief, frustration, and stress - anything that is contrary to the altruistic image you crave to portray. You might not even be conscious of repressing these types of emotions, but here's the thing: you cannot give yourself over to other people, deny yourself, and expect to feel aligned, authentic or whole in the long-term. Blocked emotions do not simply disappear. They will remind you that they are there through physical or psychological breakdown.
RE: https://universeodon.com/@RevDrMatthewFox/117395691761068972
THIS TUESDAY - MARK YOUR CALENDAR!
Why does naming #evil matter? How can we resist it w/o becoming consumed by hatred ourselves? Matthew Fox & Lake Drive Books publisher David Morris join in live convo on Trump & the MAGA Movement as Antichrist: Recognizing the Archetype of Evil in Our Time. 10/13, 4:00 pm PT tinyurl.com/yy2ezzpp
Revolta tashmë në një rrugë pa kthim, studentët ballë për ballë me flakët, zjarrfikësja nuk ndërhyn
Machine translated: "The uprising has reached a point of no return; students are face-to-face with the flames, yet the fire department is not intervening."
Hard for me to tell exactly who did what here. From previous comments from Albanians in protests, it is a tactic of the cops to have plainclothes cops get inside the protest to try to start shit, then get the protest to go in a direction they have an excuse to put down harshly.
But at largely young male protests, you can also have things go off the rails.
The building that's on fire is a small retail building, but it's next to the Apostolic Nunciature to Albania (Papal Embassy) and to an apartment building with retail on the bottom.
You don't see a lot of religious hatred in Albania so I deeply doubt that was a target.
#FlamingoRevolution
#Albania
#Corruption
#Balkans
#Europe
#Students
#Protest
How HateSphere has continued to find success after over twenty-five years playing their tried, true, and dated brand of Scandathrash is beyond me. With a catalog as inconsistent in quality as an Arizona highway, these Danes continue pounding out records like Mormon men with fourteen-person families. After two decades of personnel changes, the best thing going for the band is the surprise behind the mic. But since 2023’s Hatred Reborn, there haven’t been any real surprises behind the scenes. Minus a new drummer, founder Peter Lyse Karmark continues to lead the charge, even bringing back Mathia Uldall for vocal duties. With a touch more melody than the previous record, this year’s Guillotine delivers ten new tracks to either push the envelope or just… be.
Against better judgment, this will be the fourth time I review a HateSphere release. But I initially requested this prison sentence because I enjoyed records like Bloodred Hatred and The Great Bludgeoning. Not to mention, I’ve been a genre lover from the early days of At the Gates, The Haunted, and Witchery. But man, it’s been a rough few records of mediocrity and staleness. Because the entire structure hasn’t changed in the last three years, maybe Guillotine will start a focused era of output. Wait, why the fuck am I being positive?
This twelfth album opens with the aptly titled instrumental “Chapter XII.” After the soft, reverberating guitars, the distortion kicks in, and we are provided with one of the best riffs on the album.1 The opener sets the tone nicely, slingshotting us into the purely predictable but solid “Dogma.” Wrapped up tightly in every element that defines the band, “Dogma” aggressively barks and growls; guitars hammer and swirl; and alternates between groove and melody. But in the end, it’s nothing special; it’s the standard we expect from HateSphere.
Thankfully, there are a few exciting numbers, like the back-to-back “Cleansing” and “Snake Charmer.” The first opens with a standard melodic introduction before firing off into a fun main riff. When the vocals arrive, the guitars come and go, letting the bass rise to the surface. After clawing through massive overlaid barks and growls, it ends with a headbangable chug of pure bliss. “Snake Charmer” is an extra minute-plus, delivering sinister vibes and a razor-sharp riff straight from Witchery’s Don’t Fear the Reaper. Toss in some melodicness and a good balance of back-and-forth antics, and it’s a pleasing piece. For something a bit more Soilwork-meets-Dark Tranquillity, ensure you check out the catchy and punchy “Human Scum.”
But as is the case with most recent HateSphere records, filler pieces or duds distract or poison the flow. Unfortunately, it really hurts when it’s the first single and the title track. The main riff of “Guillotine” is the laziest attempt at Pantera’s “5 Minutes Alone.” I mean, I like the tone and direction, but then it drops into that slow, dissonant, overused guitar sound that bores the hell out of it. The best part is the riff transition at the end, but, ya know, it’s a bit late. “Bottom Feeder” is another slogger with a decent vocal approach, but it tries so hard to be old-school death that it never develops further than the character. The closer is the longest on the album and one of the biggest letdowns. “Heresy” feels like the expected album epic, and the band thought so too, but like “Guillotine,” it goes on and on, moving up and down for no reason, and consists of bruiser riffs and bully vocals that won’t end.
With a typical Tue Madsen master and early 2000s compression, Guillotine is just another in a long string of mixed HateSphere records. It has some kickass tunes, some predictable ones, and others that try so hard they become forgettable.2 That said, denying their drive and prolificity would make me a poser because I still come back to see if the next record breaks the mold. Guillotine has some interesting tweaks that freshen the palette for us old-time fans, but nothing cracks the surface that hasn’t been done numerous times over. But I didn’t hate everything, and what I did like will be added to my HateSphere playlist.
Rating: 2.5/5.0
DR: 6 | Format Reviewed: 256 kb/s mp3
Label: Scarlet Records | Bandcamp
Websites: hatesphere.com | facebook.com/hatesphereofficial
Releases Worldwide: October 9th, 2026
This is not #RocketScience . Understand damage already done by the current administration and #Republicans has very high probability of being substantially irreversible. Understand that means full deprecation and necrosis of the rule of law as it pertains to #Constitutional rights protections that exist nowhere else. Understand that it means permanent degradation for #Women, #Minorities and #Children under the law
Alert: Trump Takes His Hatred of Me to the Supreme Court
https://youtu.be/0wwXCTZmlgc?si=od-MH69XZy7oPjUA
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.
-- Abraham Lincoln
⬆ #Wisdom #Quotes #AbrahamLincoln #Ethics #Society #Work
⬇ #Photography #Panorama #Panopainting #Flowers #Junkyard #Minnesota
Israel Goes Ballistic Over Navi Pillay.
Article republished by Jerry Alatalo | October 12, 2026
Israel goes ballistic over Nobel Laureate Navi Pillay
October 12, 2026
Navi Pillay in Nuremberg, Germany, on Friday (Daniel Karmann)
Foreign Ministry says ‘Goebbels is applauding from Hell’ over Nobel Peace Prize being awarded to jurist who chaired a UN commission that concluded Israel had committed genocide in Gaza – 3 articles below
(1/3) ‘Goebbels Applauding From Hell’ Israel Denounces Nobel Peace Prize Winner Over Gaza Genocide Probe
Reposted from Haaretz, October 09, 2026
Chair of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, South African judge Navi Pillay, gestures after a press conference in Geneva in September 2025.The Israeli Foreign Ministry accused Navi Pillay of a ‘relentless, politically motivated demonization of Israel’ over her having chaired a UN commission of inquiry that concluded that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza
Israel denounced on Friday the decision to award Navanethem “Navi” Pillay the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accusing the laureate of spreading “blood libels” against Israel and claiming she helped legitimize a “fake case” against the country at the International Criminal Court.
“The Nobel Prize committee has lost its moral compass,” Netanyahu wrote on X, accusing Pillay of building her career around “inventing and propagating blood libels against the one and only Jewish state.”
Netanyahu also accused Pillay of helping ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan build a case against Israel, alleging that Khan, who was accused by ICC employees of rape and sexual molestation, had used her “lies” in the case. Khan has denied the allegations against him.
Israel’s Foreign Ministry also condemned the award, accusing Pillay of “relentless, politically motivated demonization of Israel” over her role chairing a UN commission of inquiry that concluded Israel had committed genocide in Gaza.
“If there were an award for lies, hatred, and blood libels, Navi Pillay wouldn’t just be a contender. She’d be a frontrunner,” the ministry said in a statement on X. It also called accusations of genocide against Israel “the biggest lie of the 21st century.”
The statement also said that accusations of genocide leveled at Israel are “the biggest lie of the 21st century.”
“Joseph Goebbels is certainly applauding from hell,” it added, referring to Nazi Germany’s chief propagandist during the Holocaust.
The UN human rights chief said that Pillay’s Nobel Prize was a collective win for human rights and for all those seeking justice and accountability, including through the International Criminal Court.
Volker Turk, who worked closely with Navi Pillay during her tenure as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2008 to 2014, described her as “the embodiment of international law”.
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk speaks with a staff member after a press statement following the announcement that Navi Pillay has been awarded the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, in Geneva, Switzerland, on Friday.“The fact that the Nobel Award Commission decided to give this to Navi Pillay is a collective win for human rights, but also for (those) seeking justice and accountability in this world,” Turk said in response to a question about Pillay’s former role as an ICC judge.
Pillay, who was chair of a UN Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory until last year, found that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza.
“It is a recognition not only of what she did in relation to Palestine, but frankly what she did in relation to so many other conflicts and situations around the world,” said Turk.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee said Pillay was awarded the prize “for her efforts to promote peace and international law.”
Pillay, 85, held states and national leaders accountable and brought hope to victims of violence and conflict, and demonstrated a firm moral compass in her long career, the committee said.
(For Parts 2 and 3, see: IsraelPalestineNews.org)
#InternationalCriminalCourt #InternationalLaw #InternationalRelations #Israel #NobelPeacePrize2026 #UnitedNations
DATE: October 12, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG
** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------
TITLE: Is fatness a feminist issue?
URL: https://www.psypost.org/is-fatness-a-feminist-issue/
Recent research published in Sex Roles suggests that while many fat women identify as feminists, they do not consistently view their body size as a feminist issue. The study highlights a divide in how women understand their bodies, with some pointing to gendered double standards and societal discrimination, while others view their weight as a matter of personal responsibility.
Anti-fatness refers to the systemic and interpersonal prejudice directed at people with larger bodies. Feminist scholars have often linked this anti-fat stigma to traditional gender roles and patriarchal beauty norms. This perspective argues that societal pressure to be thin falls especially hard on women, creating toxic environments that negatively impact their body image, mental health, and social standing.
“American society is often fixated on how women look,” lead author Breanne Fahs, a professor of women and gender studies at Arizona State University and author of Fat and Furious: Igniting Radical Fat Resistance, told PsyPost. “Women are often told to be young, pretty, and skinny by their parents, partners, classmates, and strangers. Psychological research has often shown the problems with ‘thin idealization’ and living for a male gaze. In particular, women are criticized about having defective bodies, and they consequently fear gaining weight, try dangerous diets, and/or loathe their own bodies.”
“In the 1970s, second wave feminists warned that the fixation on slender bodies seriously hurt women and the slogan of ‘fat is a feminist issue’ was born,” Fahs added. “In the last twenty years there has been a growth of social movements that challenged the sexist assumptions of fat stigma, with the group called National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance (NAAFA) leading the way.”
Research has shown that fat women generally face harsher social and economic consequences for their body size than fat men. In one study, fat women were 16 times more likely than fat men to report weight-related job discrimination, and other studies have found that fat women receive harsher judgments of their parenting and are more often denied loans, promotions, or apartments. Fat men, on the other hand, tend to face less stigma and fewer everyday indignities for similar body sizes.
Despite these documented disparities, it has remained an open question whether fat women themselves view their physical experiences through a political or feminist lens. Fahs and her colleague Eric Swank, a professor of social and cultural analysis at Arizona State University, sought to understand how fat women talk about this connection and whether they recognize the gendered dimensions of weight stigma that academics often discuss.
“Lots of research has looked at the causes and consequences of fat hatred among women of all body sizes,” Fahs explained. “Some studies have even looked at the reasons for being a fat activist, but the way fat women view feminism has mostly been overlooked.”
Fahs’s own work helped motivate the project. She has written about women’s dread of gaining weight, anti-fat bias in health care, and the relationships between fat therapists and fat patients. Her experience as both a professor and a practicing clinical psychologist left her curious about whether fat women see anti-fat stigma through a feminist lens.
To investigate this, the researchers interviewed 20 women living in the United States who self-identified as fat or overweight. The participants were recruited through local classified advertisements on Craigslist, allowing the research team to reach a geographically diverse group. The women ranged in age from 27 to 66, with an average age of 40. Half were women of color, 40 percent identified as bisexual or lesbian, and their body weights ranged from under 200 to over 300 pounds.
All 20 interviews were conducted by Fahs over video calls and lasted about 90 minutes each. She asked the women questions about their bodies, their social experiences, and their political perspectives. Two key questions guided the core of the analysis: whether the participants considered themselves feminists, and whether they believed fatness was a feminist issue. The researchers did not provide a definition of feminism, allowing each participant to respond according to her own understanding.
The participants’ responses pointed to a complex divide between personal identification and political frameworks. Thirteen women explicitly identified as feminists, three said they might use the label for certain issues, and four rejected it entirely. When asked if fatness was a feminist issue, the group was evenly split: eight said yes, four said maybe, and eight said no. Several self-identified feminists insisted that fatness was not a feminist issue, while one woman, identified in the study as Marge, firmly rejected the feminist label but still stated that it was.
The researchers identified six distinct themes in how the participants evaluated the issue. Three of the themes supported a connection between weight and feminism. Four women highlighted gendered double standards, observing that society readily accepts fat men as funny or relatable, while fat women face intense social disapproval for the same size. Three women described fatness as a central way women are judged, explaining that a woman’s social worth remains tied to physical appearance.
Overt discrimination, tied for the most common theme linking the two concepts, was raised by four participants. These women cited institutional obstacles in hiring, healthcare, and media representation as evidence of a broader feminist problem. When discussing these barriers, Fahs noted that participants “elaborated how workplaces, hospitals, schools, and families discriminate against women who are fat.”
The remaining three themes rejected the connection between body size and feminism. Three women stated that fatness has nothing to do with feminism, arguing that body weight is an individual matter of personal responsibility and lifestyle rather than gender politics. Two women maintained that fatness has nothing to do with gender, arguing that weight stigma affects people of all genders equally and should not be framed as a women’s issue.
In the final theme, three participants argued that fat women deserve ridicule, framing teasing as a natural consequence of body size or a motivator to lose weight.
Describing these women, Fahs said, “They thought fat women were supposed to be ‘made fun of by someone who is not fat’ and fat people ‘should lose weight’ if they do not want to be teased. This diversity of perspectives shows how fat resistance and feminist fat liberation perspectives still diverge from narratives of self-blame and ridicule.”
The findings point to an uneven alignment between feminist theory and the everyday perspectives of fat women. While some participants expressed an awareness of gender inequality, others expressed anti-fat attitudes, which the authors say could reflect internalized stigma or a form of anti-feminism, or viewed their struggles as entirely personal. The researchers noted that framing fatness through a political lens rather than individual failure could help people challenge anti-fat bias and reduce feelings of personal self-blame.
As with all research, there are some caveats to consider. The study relied on a small group of 20 women recruited through Craigslist during the COVID-19 pandemic, so the sample does not reflect the full population of fat women in the United States. In addition, the questions about feminism came after about an hour of discussion focused on fatness, which may have influenced the way participants answered.
The study also asked participants whether they identified as feminists rather than measuring specific feminist beliefs, and several women appeared to associate feminism primarily with the #MeToo movement or perceived extremes. Both researchers identify as fat feminists, and Fahs conducted all 20 interviews herself, which could have shaped how participants discussed sensitive topics. Future research using standardized surveys could help clarify how widespread these viewpoints are across the broader population.
The study, “Does Fatness Politicize Women? Fat Women’s Narratives on Whether Fatness is a Feminist Issue,” was authored by Breanne Fahs and Eric Swank.
URL: https://www.psypost.org/is-fatness-a-feminist-issue/
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #FatFeminism #FatAcceptance #BodyPolitics #AntiFatBias #FeministIssues #Fatphobia #GenderAndBody #WomenAndWeight #FatActivism #BeautyStandards
Super interesting blogpost by DomainTools
"Looking closer, the engineer noted the flood originated with a single domain, and that one domain now accounted for up to 500,000 observations per second on our network."
"To me, this largely looked like a very voluminous emergency offsite backup."
