home.social

#nogenai — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #nogenai, aggregated by home.social.

  1. RE: kolektiva.social/@yenndc/11658

    TL;DR — why you should pay a sex worker instead of playing pretend with a chatbot “““girlfriend”””.

    … I mean, that wasn't the point, but it *does* apply as well.

    #SexWork #AI #AIGirlfriend #AIChatbot #StopGenAI #NoGenAI #SexWorkers

  2. RE: kolektiva.social/@yenndc/11658

    TL;DR — why you should pay a sex worker instead of playing pretend with a chatbot “““girlfriend”””.

    … I mean, that wasn't the point, but it *does* apply as well.

    #SexWork #AI #AIGirlfriend #AIChatbot #StopGenAI #NoGenAI #SexWorkers

  3. 🎉 Best deal ever on #jetbrains : if your #PyCharm subscription has just ended or is about to end, you get a perpetual "fallback" license to PyCharm 2024.3, aka the best PyCharm version ever, since 2025.* was all about #AI bullshit features and reduced stability.

    #python #ide #webdev #django #resistGenAI #noAI #noGenAI

  4. So people are going all "I don't like genAI and I'll never use it, but... I just couldn't resist." And they're making these creepy profile pics. A friend of mine artist Steven Luna, said he'd make a free profile pic so folks wouldn't have to use genAI. So he made me this. I LOVE IT!! #NoGenAI #HumanPoweredCreator #ArtistsOverAI

  5. So people are going all "I don't like genAI and I'll never use it, but... I just couldn't resist." And they're making these creepy profile pics. A friend of mine artist Steven Luna, said he'd make a free profile pic so folks wouldn't have to use genAI. So he made me this. I LOVE IT!! #NoGenAI #HumanPoweredCreator #ArtistsOverAI

  6. Thats great! 416 experienced qualitative researchers from 38 countries reject the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications for Big Q Qualitative approaches, such as reflexive thematic analysis, or various phenomenological approaches.

    They describe three primary reasons for the rejection:
    1. GenAI as simulated intelligence is incapable of meaning making
    2. Qualitative research should remain a distinctly human practice
    3. The established manifold harms of GenAI, especially to the environment and workers in the Global South

    "[...] the algorithmic patterns upon which GenAI operates predisposes GenAI to identify, replicate and reinforce dominant language and patterns; risking the further quieting of marginal voices and practices, including those of critical scholars. The voices and practices of people who live/breathe/feel/imagine/construct knowledge in the maroons of life – along with their stunning/quirky/complex/unpredictable ways – may be lost or worse; sacrificed."

    papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

    #PositionStatement #Preprint #GenAI #NoGenAI #QualitativeResearch #Research #Science #BigQ

  7. Thats great! 416 experienced qualitative researchers from 38 countries reject the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications for Big Q Qualitative approaches, such as reflexive thematic analysis, or various phenomenological approaches.

    They describe three primary reasons for the rejection:
    1. GenAI as simulated intelligence is incapable of meaning making
    2. Qualitative research should remain a distinctly human practice
    3. The established manifold harms of GenAI, especially to the environment and workers in the Global South

    "[...] the algorithmic patterns upon which GenAI operates predisposes GenAI to identify, replicate and reinforce dominant language and patterns; risking the further quieting of marginal voices and practices, including those of critical scholars. The voices and practices of people who live/breathe/feel/imagine/construct knowledge in the maroons of life – along with their stunning/quirky/complex/unpredictable ways – may be lost or worse; sacrificed."

    papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

    #PositionStatement #Preprint #GenAI #NoGenAI #QualitativeResearch #Research #Science #BigQ

  8. Thats great! 416 experienced qualitative researchers from 38 countries reject the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications for Big Q Qualitative approaches, such as reflexive thematic analysis, or various phenomenological approaches.

    They describe three primary reasons for the rejection:
    1. GenAI as simulated intelligence is incapable of meaning making
    2. Qualitative research should remain a distinctly human practice
    3. The established manifold harms of GenAI, especially to the environment and workers in the Global South

    "[...] the algorithmic patterns upon which GenAI operates predisposes GenAI to identify, replicate and reinforce dominant language and patterns; risking the further quieting of marginal voices and practices, including those of critical scholars. The voices and practices of people who live/breathe/feel/imagine/construct knowledge in the maroons of life – along with their stunning/quirky/complex/unpredictable ways – may be lost or worse; sacrificed."

    papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

    #PositionStatement #Preprint #GenAI #NoGenAI #QualitativeResearch #Research #Science #BigQ

  9. Thats great! 416 experienced qualitative researchers from 38 countries reject the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications for Big Q Qualitative approaches, such as reflexive thematic analysis, or various phenomenological approaches.

    They describe three primary reasons for the rejection:
    1. GenAI as simulated intelligence is incapable of meaning making
    2. Qualitative research should remain a distinctly human practice
    3. The established manifold harms of GenAI, especially to the environment and workers in the Global South

    "[...] the algorithmic patterns upon which GenAI operates predisposes GenAI to identify, replicate and reinforce dominant language and patterns; risking the further quieting of marginal voices and practices, including those of critical scholars. The voices and practices of people who live/breathe/feel/imagine/construct knowledge in the maroons of life – along with their stunning/quirky/complex/unpredictable ways – may be lost or worse; sacrificed."

    papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

    #PositionStatement #Preprint #GenAI #NoGenAI #QualitativeResearch #Research #Science #BigQ

  10. Thats great! 416 experienced qualitative researchers from 38 countries reject the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications for Big Q Qualitative approaches, such as reflexive thematic analysis, or various phenomenological approaches.

    They describe three primary reasons for the rejection:
    1. GenAI as simulated intelligence is incapable of meaning making
    2. Qualitative research should remain a distinctly human practice
    3. The established manifold harms of GenAI, especially to the environment and workers in the Global South

    "[...] the algorithmic patterns upon which GenAI operates predisposes GenAI to identify, replicate and reinforce dominant language and patterns; risking the further quieting of marginal voices and practices, including those of critical scholars. The voices and practices of people who live/breathe/feel/imagine/construct knowledge in the maroons of life – along with their stunning/quirky/complex/unpredictable ways – may be lost or worse; sacrificed."

    papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf

    #PositionStatement #Preprint #GenAI #NoGenAI #QualitativeResearch #Research #Science #BigQ