home.social

Search

27 results for “gapry”

  1. Gary Neville names two Man Utd stars who must not play together after Spurs draw | Football

    Neville has seen enough of the midfield pairing (Picture: Getty) Goodwin/ProSports/Shutterstock) Gary Neville has ‘seen enough’ of Manchester…
    #Football #Soccer #News #GaryNeville #KobbieMainoo #ManchesterUnited #MichaelCarrick #PremierLeague #Sport #TottenhamHotspur #YouriTielemans
    europesays.com/football/71946/

  2. Writing Fri 09 Oct Tibaldi Bononia and Colorverse Kilonova

    What are you writing with today?

    Tibaldi Bononia <Steel Broad> + Colorverse Kilonova

    Paper: Anko

    youtube.com/garryeves

    #edc #fountainpen #fountainpens #penoftheday #dailypen #TibaldiBononia #Tibaldi #Colorverse #ColorverseKilonova

  3. Song Review: Gary Calamar featuring Robyn Hitchcock – “Who Are We Gonna Be Today?”

    On October 9, 2026, Los Angeles singer-songwriter Gary Calamar released “Who Are We Gonna Be Today?” as a single to promote his forthcoming album, ODD NUMB3RS AND SLANTED RHYMES.

    aeschtunes.com/2026/10/09/song

    #Music, #MusicReview, #GaryCalamar, #RobynHitchcock, #2020s, #2020sMusic, #RockMusic, #AeschTunes

  4. Delivered automotive parts from Gary to Chicago in Freight Fate: 33 miles, on time. Earned the Twenty-Five Pins in the Map achievement.

    #FreightFateRuns

  5. “Students for a Democratic Society” by Harvey Pekar and Gary Dumm et al (2008). A congratulatory treatment of SDS activists that centers their tension with other 1960s movements (PLP, Panthers, Weathermen, SNCC). Disjointed and episodic retellings lack a main narrative arc and rely much more on isolated exclamations than dialogue. 2pp of notes.

    Apparently #8 in a series of graphic history reviews. #sds #students #labor #left #activism #usa #history #histodons #comic #graphicnovel #book

  6. Now playing on 🎸 Joint Radio Blues Rock:
    🎵 Gary Moore - Still Got the Blues

    Perfect song for right now. Jump in the stream:
    jointil.com

    #Blues #Rock #BluesRock #classicRock #NowPlaying #Radio

  7. Oh…!!! Via @garymarcus

    Every minute we wait risks disaster
    GARY MARCUS
    10 HOURS AGO

    Breaking new from The New York Times, the latest of many agent-caused incidents that are happening with frightening regularity, but this time from Anthropic and fairly serious:

    garymarcus.substack.com/p/we-m

    #ai #news #uspol #us #openai

  8. 🛸 Transmission intercepted...
    Currently broadcasting: Avian Flu Pandemic - Dr. Gary Ridenour - 2008-01-04 - Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell

    👽 Tune in now: nyeug.com

    #NowPlaying #ArtBell #UFO #HighStrangeness #C2CAM

  9. May it never cease to fill me with absolute joy and delight that I can just casually run into Gary [bleeding!] Kamiya as we’re both stopping into the library on our respective dog walks because one of the best writers I’ve ever read just lives in my neighborhood.

    Gary, if you see this, have a wonderful time at the wedding! Best wishes and may the mishaps of the day be trivial in the grand scheme of the love you’re there to celebrate. 🥰🥂

    #SFLyfe #NorthBeachBestBeach

  10. europesays.com/uk/1248728/ Gareth Malone looks back: ‘After the Christmas No 1, I was meeting Simon Cowell, having tea with Gary Barlow and dinner with Andrew Lloyd Webber’ | Family #Entertainment #music #UK #UnitedKingdom

  11. Gareth Malone looks back: ‘After the Christmas No 1, I was meeting Simon Cowell, having tea with Gary Barlow and dinner with Andrew Lloyd Webber’
    By Harriet Gibsone

    The choir leader and presenter on not fitting in at his all-boys grammar, how synthesisers changed everything, and his ‘dithering’ start on TV

    theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2

    #Family #Lifeandstyle #GarethMalone #Choralmusic #Classicalmusic #Music #EducationalTV #Television #Televisionradio #Culture #Youngpeople #Olderpeople #Society #Photography #TheGuardian #HarrietGibsone

  12. A Trump-Appointed Judge Says ICE Agents Lied Under Oath and Faked Records After Wrongly Arresting a U.S. Citizen in the Bronx

    Judge Gary R. Brown found agents gave 'apparently perjurious' testimony and backfilled databases after the violent May 6 arrests…

    #Bronx #Federalcourts #ICE

    beezloop.com/judge-gary-brown-

  13. NFL asks Supreme Court to let states regulate prediction markets instead of federal regulators

    The NFL joined states, former regulator Gary Gensler and former Senator Chris Dodd in asking the Supreme Court to uphold state gambling oversight of prediction markets.

    newisty.com/blog/nfl-asks-supr

    #predictionmarkets #regulation #cftc

  14. #WenkoffRetro No. 350 🎶❤️
    #retromusic

    S #80smusic je pátek nejvíc nejlepší!

    Zítra oslaví 73. narozeniny jedna z ostrovních hvězd - skotský zpěvák, muzikant, skladatel a producent *Jim Ure*, známý pod uměleckým jménem *MIDGE URE*. (Midge = "phonetic reversal of Jim", jak praví Wiki. How simple!)

    *Midge* (nar. 10.10.1953) je považován za jednoho z hlavních architektů zvuku synthpopu a nové vlny 80s. Hudební kariéru odstartoval v r. 1969 a postupně prošel kapelami *Slik*, *Thin Lizzy*, *Rich Kids*, *Visage* a *Ultravox*.

    V *Thin Lizzy* jen zaskakoval za Gary Moora na turné 1979.

    Ve *Visage* - studiovém projektu, který definoval styl "New Romantics", se blýskl mj. hitem *Fade to Grey*.

    V kapele *Ultravox* (1979–86) to byl docela kvapík. Po odchodu původního frontmana Johna Foxxe tam *Midge* nastoupil jako zpěvák, kytarista a klávesista. Kapelu zcela přetvořil – posunul ji od post-punku k melodickému synthpopu a sofistikovanému elektronickému rocku.

    Stal se hlavním tvůrčím motorem a autorem ikonických alb jako *Vienna* (1980), *Rage in Eden* (1981) či *Quartet* (1982).

    V r. 1982 vydal *Midge* první sólový singl a v r. 1985 vydáním prvního sólového alba zahajuje inventuru v *Ultravox* a definitivně míří na sólovou dráhu. Dosud vydal 9 studiových alb, 15 alb živých (!), přes 20 singlů a 4 video alba.

    Za přínos populární hudbě a propagaci Británie nadarmo není nositelem Řádu Britského impéria (OBE).

    A teď dvě dávky. A jeden #flashback navíc, když je ten pátek. 😉
    #80sforever

    *Midge Ure se nám tu už jednou jako autor objevil. Tenhle extra bonus ber jako lehkou přípravu na Vánoce. Však už je říjen!* 😉
    mastodonczech.cz/@OttovonWenko

  15. Ahoj, další #rockforcoffee je tady😁❤️🎸

    Narozeniny rockových a metalových desek ❤️💙🤟

    #rockforcoffee
    #narozeniny ⁨slavných rockových alb 365/54(padesát čtyři)

    pokračujeme v našem rockovém a metalovém kalendáři. Tentokrát s datem 10. října❤️🎸🎤

    🎸Deep Purple - Come Taste the Band (1975)
    🥁Budgie - Power Supply (1980)
    🤟D.R.I. - Thrash Zone (1989)
    👊McAuley Schenker Group - Save Yourself (1989)
    🎤Iron Maiden - The X Factor (1995)
    👽Testament - Para Bellum (2025)

    Vítězem je kapela MSG🎸🥁

    “Save Yourself” je druhé album McAuley Schenker Group (MSG) a zároveň jedna z nejlepších ukázek Schenkerova období s Robinem McAuleym. Album vyšlo 10. října 1989 u Capitol/EMI, produkoval ho Frank Filipetti a má zhruba 50 minut. Hudebně se pohybuje mezi melodickým hard rockem, heavy metalem a tehdejším AOR…

    Michael Schenker se proslavil nejprve s německými Scorpions, ale světovou reputaci získal hlavně jako kytarista kapely UFO. patří k pilířům klasického hard rocku.
    Schenker měl jednu obrovskou přednost, nepotřeboval hrát milion not🎸 Jeho sóla byla melodická, zpěvná a často okamžitě rozpoznatelná. Jeho charakteristický tón se stal skoro stejně důležitým jako samotné skladby…
    Po odchodu z UFO založil Michael v roce 1979 Michael Schenker Group (MSG). V první éře kapely v ní zpívali třeba Graham Bonnet, nebo Gary Barden. Hráli v ní vynikající muzikanti jako Cozy Powell, Paul Raymond nebo Simon Phillips. V 80. letech se ale Schenker začal více orientovat na melodický hard rock🎸. A právě tady přichází Robin McAuley🎤

    Robin McAuley byl irský zpěvák, který měl úplně jiný typ hlasu než například Gary Barden. Michael Schenker zjistil, že tahle kombinace funguje fakt dobře. První album s novou sestavou bylo “Perfect Timing” (1987) a “Save Yourself” z roku 1989 na něj přímo navazuje…

    🧶 1/3

  16. 🧠 ON PEUT VOUS FAIRE AVOUER UN CRIME QUE VOUS N'AVEZ JAMAIS COMMIS.

    Imaginez qu'un chercheur vous contacte pour parler de votre adolescence.

    Il connaît votre école, votre famille, certains événements de votre passé. Des informations authentiques, obtenues auprès de vos parents.

    Puis il évoque un incident dont vous n'avez aucun souvenir.

    Une bagarre. Un vol. Peut-être même une agression avec une arme.

    Vous protestez. Vous n'avez jamais fait ça.

    Mais le chercheur insiste. Il vous explique que vos parents ont confirmé l'événement, vous invite à essayer de retrouver les détails et vous demande d'imaginer ce qui aurait pu se passer.

    Vous revenez pour un deuxième entretien. Puis un troisième.

    Peu à peu, certains participants commencent à raconter l'incident.

    Ils décrivent des circonstances, des sensations, des détails.

    Une histoire prend forme.

    Le problème ?

    Elle n'a jamais eu lieu.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    🔬 UNE EXPÉRIENCE BIEN RÉELLE

    En 2015, les psychologues Julia Shaw et Stephen Porter publient une étude dans Psychological Science.

    Leur objectif : déterminer si des techniques d'entretien suggestives peuvent amener des personnes à développer de faux souvenirs d'actes criminels commis pendant l'adolescence.

    Le résultat fait sensation.

    Selon les critères utilisés par les chercheurs, 70 % des participants du groupe « crime » auraient développé de faux souvenirs détaillés.

    Imaginez les conséquences si un phénomène semblable se produisait lors d'un interrogatoire.

    Une personne innocente pourrait-elle finir par raconter avec conviction un acte qu'elle n'a jamais commis ?

    La question est suffisamment inquiétante.

    Mais cette histoire comporte un deuxième piège.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    💥 LES 70 % ÉTAIENT EUX AUSSI TROMPEURS.

    En 2018, trois autres chercheuses, Kimberley Wade, Maryanne Garry et Kathy Pezdek, réexaminent les données.

    Elles remarquent quelque chose d'essentiel.

    Raconter les détails d'un événement suggéré ne signifie pas nécessairement qu'on possède un véritable souvenir subjectif de cet événement.

    On peut accepter qu'une chose se soit produite sans se rappeler l'avoir vécue.

    On peut aussi imaginer des détails pour répondre aux questions, tout en doutant profondément de leur réalité.

    En appliquant d'autres critères déjà utilisés dans la recherche sur la mémoire, elles obtiennent une proportion bien différente :

    Environ 26 à 30 % de faux souvenirs, contre 70 % dans l'interprétation initiale.

    Ce n'est pas une réfutation du phénomène.

    C'est une remise en question de son ampleur.

    Et surtout, de ce qu'on accepte d'appeler un souvenir.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    🧩 ALORS, PEUT-ON FAIRE CROIRE À QUELQU'UN QU'IL A COMMIS UN CRIME ?

    Dans certaines conditions expérimentales, oui.

    Des personnes peuvent construire de faux récits autobiographiques, et certaines rapportent effectivement une expérience ressemblant à un souvenir.

    Mais cela ne signifie pas qu'un interrogateur peut fabriquer à volonté n'importe quel souvenir chez n'importe qui.

    L'expérience de 2015 reposait sur un contexte particulier : des informations personnelles authentiques, une fausse confirmation parentale et plusieurs entretiens suggestifs.

    Et elle ne démontre pas qu'une telle manipulation conduirait systématiquement à de faux aveux judiciaires.

    La distinction est importante.

    En 2020, une autre étude montre d'ailleurs combien il peut être difficile, pour des observateurs, de distinguer des récits de souvenirs authentiques et de faux souvenirs à partir d'enregistrements.

    Notre impression qu'une personne « a vraiment l'air de se souvenir » n'est donc pas une garantie.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    🔎 LE PLUS TROUBLANT N'EST PEUT-ÊTRE PAS QUE NOTRE MÉMOIRE PUISSE NOUS TROMPER.

    C'est que nous utilisons précisément cette mémoire pour décider de ce qui nous est arrivé.

    Et qu'en étudiant cette fragilité, les scientifiques doivent eux-mêmes prendre garde à ne pas confondre une conviction, un récit et un souvenir.

    Nous faisons confiance à nos souvenirs parce qu'ils nous semblent familiers.

    Mais la familiarité n'est pas une preuve.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    📚 SOURCES :

    • Shaw, J. & Porter, S. (2015). « Constructing Rich False Memories of Committing Crime ». Psychological Science, 26(3), 291–301.
    doi.org/10.1177/09567976145628

    • Wade, K. A., Garry, M. & Pezdek, K. (2018). « Deconstructing Rich False Memories of Committing Crime ». Psychological Science.

    • Shaw, J. & Porter, S. (2018). Corrigendum de l'étude de 2015.
    doi.org/10.1177/09567976187623

    • Shaw, J. (2020). « Do False Memories Look Real? » Frontiers in Psychology.
    doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.006

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    #QUAERO #science #psychologie #mémoire #fauxsouvenirs #cerveau #espritcritique #justice #zététique

    #Science #Psychology #FalseMemories #Memory #Neuroscience #CriticalThinking #CognitiveScience

  17. Dr. Carol Tavris: Social Psychologist, Writer, Lecturer

    Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen

    Publication (Outlet/Website): Phenomenon

    Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2026/07/22

    1. What academic positions have you held?

    Although I have taught at various institutions, including the New School for Social Research in New York and UCLA, I have never held a full-time academic position. I have always loved teaching, especially the intro course, but my career has primarily been as a writer—of textbooks, general interest books, book reviews and essays, articles for journals and magazines—all with the goal of promoting critical thinking and psychological science.  In a world full of pop-psych pseudoscience, that is a full-time job!

    2. How did you develop that career? 

    When I was in graduate school, a new magazine called Psychology Today was born. It was meant to be the Scientific American of psychology—a magazine that would bring good psychological science to general audiences. I wrote to them, looking for a summer job. They told me they would hire me, but only if I came for a year. Though scared to death to take a year off the Ph.D. program, I did, and that experience changed my life. There, working with brilliant editors, I learned to write, edit, and conduct interviews. When I went back to Michigan, I was an Associate Editor.  When I got my Ph.D., I had a choice: proceed with an academic career or go back to the magazine as a Senior Editor.  The latter option was risky: no tenure or even job security, after all. But my beloved mentors at UM said, “You know, there are many ways to be a good social psychologist, and one of them is having the ability to educate the public about what social psychology is.”

    3. When did psychology interest you?

    Not as an undergraduate! I took one intro course and got a C+. I majored in comparative literature and sociology, and went to the University of Michigan in sociology—to study “the sociology of literature,” whatever that was. But there I found the interdisciplinary program in social psychology, and loved it. I switched into that program immediately. We learned an array of methods, topics, and perspectives.

    4. Where did you acquire your education?

    I was an undergraduate at Brandeis University, and a graduate student at Michigan. But I “acquired my education” also first and foremost from my parents, who were committed to critical and creative thinking, and social activism; from working at general-interest magazines, which taught me the importance of using my education to help inform the public about science and critical thinking; and by coming of age during the civil-rights and women’s rights movements.

    5. Since you began studying psychology, what do you consider the controversial topics?

    There is always “controversy” in any field: sometimes over politically sensitive issues (e.g., sex and race differences), or over methods, or about findings. In my lifetime, the most divisive and emotional issues were the “recovered memory” and “multiple personality” hysteria of the 1990s, along with widespread claims in Canada and the U.S. of ritual sex abuse going on in daycare centers. So many lives and families were shattered by these faulty beliefs—notably, the idea that traumatic memories of sexual abuse are repressed until “recovered” in therapy with hypnosis, dream analysis, and other methods now known to create confabulations; that trauma causes the self to “dissociate” into many personalities; that “children never lie” about being molested. These epidemics made many psychological scientists more committed than ever to educating the public about the importance of good psychological research. That research has showed how best to interview children to avoid coercing or inducing them into telling fanciful tales, while being open to their telling about actual abuse; how “multiple personalities” can be manufactured in a collaboration between therapist and patient; and how trauma and memory really do function.

    Of all my writings, I am especially partial to the popular book I wrote with Elliot Aronson, Mistakes were made (but not by ME): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. In this book, we use cognitive dissonance to show why it is so hard for people to deal with controversies, once they have taken a position: why it is so hard to say, “hmm, time to give up that outdated belief after all” or to admit that a particular choice we made might have been wrong.

    6. You have devoted much of your life to criticizing work most often termed ‘pseudoscience’.  How do you define pseudoscience?  What do you consider its most common markers? 

    At least in its ideal form, science is falsifiable. A scientific premise can be disconfirmed; it is testable.  Do you believe that dowsing and ESP exist? Do you believe that the Bible says the world will end next Friday? These are beliefs that can be tested empirically. If the test repeatedly fails, the hypothesis is wrong—you need to modify it or drop it. But pseudoscientists keep the belief despite the disconfirming evidence: “It was the wrong day for dowsing because of clouds.” The world did not end Friday? Nothing wrong with my prediction, I just read that page of the Bible incorrectly—I meant Tuesday.

    7. You earned numerous awards for your book The Mismeasure of Woman–such as the Distinguished Media Contribution from the Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology, the Heritage Publications award from Division 35 of the American Psychological Association, and the Distinguished Contribution to Women’s Health Award from the APA Conference on Women’s Health. You have received other awards, as from the Independent Investigations Group of the Center for Inquiry, for your contributions to skepticism.  What do these awards mean to you? 

    Getting awards is extremely gratifying; it means your peers and colleagues respect and honor your work. But it’s also humbling. The next day, everyone forgets, so it’s back to work.

    8. Who most influenced you?  Can you recommend any seminal books/articles by them?

    I hate lists! This question is impossible, because my influences were feminism, and the countless important books in psychology, politics, and culture about gender equality and how to achieve it; great studies in social psychology; great writers and poets, who have inspired me as a writer . . .  how long have you got?  Besides, what had an impact on me might have no interest to you. My advice to students, therefore, is always to follow your heart, mind, and nose—explore. Read in areas other than your specialty. Read for fun. Read and memorize poetry. Take courses not only because it is a required subject, but because you’ve heard the professor is brilliant and compelling—even if that course is far afield from your major.

    9. Where do you see psychology going?

    The biggest issue that psychology will face, in my view, is to remember that it is psychology. The biomedical revolution is transforming research and how we understand human behavior; neuroscience in psychology and other fields is rising in dominance. But we must not overlook the equally powerful influences of culture, learning, and the environment in determining how we behave, what we believe, and how we shape our worlds.

    Bibliography

    1)      Center for Inquiry (2014). Center for Inquiry.  Retrieved from http://www.centerforinquiry.net/.

    2)      James Randi Foundation [JamesRandiFoundation] (2012, August 8). Carol Tavris, Ph.D. – “A Skeptical look at Neuroscience – TAM 2012. James Randi Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwxdgZeIdqI.

    3)      Tavris, C. (2006). The high cost of courage. In M. Garry & H. Hayne (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    4)      Tavris, Carol, & Aronson, Elliot (2007).  Mistakes Were Made (but not by me):  Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts.  New York: Harcourt.  Paperback edition, 2008, Harvest books.  Foreign editions: England, Poland, Germany, Japan, Hungary, Romania, France, Taiwan, China (Taiwan and mainland), South Korea, Turkey, Holland, Czech Republic.

    Last updated May  3, 2025. These terms govern all In Sight Publishing content—past, present, and future—and supersede any prior notices.  In Sight Publishing by Scott  Douglas  Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons BY‑NC‑ND 4.0; © In Sight Publishing by Scott  Douglas  Jacobsen 2012–Present. All trademarks, performances, databases & branding are owned by their rights holders; no use without permission. Unauthorized copying, modification, framing or public communication is prohibited. External links are not endorsed. Cookies & tracking require consent, and data processing complies with PIPEDA & GDPR; no data from children < 13 (COPPA). Content meets WCAG 2.1 AA under the Accessible Canada Act & is preserved in open archival formats with backups. Excerpts & links require full credit & hyperlink; limited quoting under fair-dealing & fair-use. All content is informational; no liability for errors or omissions: Feedback welcome, and verified errors corrected promptly. For permissions or DMCA notices, email: [email protected]. Site use is governed by BC laws; content is “as‑is,” liability limited, users indemnify us; moral, performers’ & database sui generis rights reserved.

    #books #life #mentalHealth #Psychology #writing
  18. Was just out doing a quick bit of deadheading between showers. A couple of these geraniums have started to flower, in October 🤔
    #Flowers #Gardening #BloomScrolling #nature

  19. Got this as a gift a few days ago. Called the balloon plant, as the buds look like air balloons.
    #BloomScrolling #Gardening #Flowers

  20. Don’t know what I was searching for.
    #beer

  21. #totp 1984 saved it but overall I don't know how the hell I got through the last two hours.

    Better luck next week poppers 🙂

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.