Search
1000 results for “message_in_a_bottle”
-
Picking up Benson after my 90 minute massage was awesome. We walked in the gorgeous sunshine, said hi to other dogs (from a distance), 💩💩 on flowers.
When we got back to Rockridge, I needed to find some water (note to self: have a bottle of tap in his go bag), and stopped at a hipster cafe for a bottle. Sigh. They only had artisanal sparkling water. I poured it into his travel water bowl.
The look he gave me.
Insulted. Hurt. Puzzled.Benson is not a fancy dog. He likes plain tap.
-
Lazy Caturday Reads
Good Day!!
Tomorrow, May 10, is Mothers Day. My Mother is no longer alive, but I still talk to her frequently. I think of her every day and take comfort in remembering stories she told me and the many times she encouraged me.
Tomorrow is also the day I stopped drinking, way back in 1982. I can’t believe it will be 44 years! My mother was visiting me on those first days of sobriety. No one believed I could do it, but somehow I knew that day that I was really going to stop drinking this time. I think having my Mom there with me helped, even though she wasn’t sure I could do it either. I love you Mom.
In the “news,” Jeff Bezos’ newspaper, The Washington Post, has seen fit to publish an “opinion” piece, supposedly written by Melania Trump. Obviously, she didn’t write it, even though it’s incredibly simplistic. Here’s bit of it: Mothers are America’s strength.
A mother’s devotion to her child is unmatched. This love takes many forms: strength, compassion, wisdom, grace, joy, labor, humor and even grief, to name a few. The love between mother and child has helped shape America’s identity since the nation’s founding 250 years ago.
It is time to revisit the enduring American family traditions that have supported generations, while also recognizing the challenges for mothers of building both a career and a home. This balancing act reflects the realities women face today.
America’s strength is closely tied to the role mothers play in shaping character, education and moral order within families. From morning until night, mothers serve as the first teachers of empathy, aspiration and discipline. It is mothers who do so much to shape a child’s mind — how to think, how to distinguish right from wrong and how to persevere in challenging times.
The household is our nation’s smallest institution, yet it is the foundation of all others, including democracy itself. The values cultivated in homes often shape the moral voice of the next generation. Looking ahead, we must consider how to strengthen this vital role.
Being a modern mother demands the discipline and restraint to not disregard what came before us. In this spirit, the healthy evolution of the American family can best be achieved by preserving the elements of the past that have proved their worth. In doing so, America can restore the honor of motherhood after years in which feminism often placed career above family, with consequences to our nation.
There just had to be a dig at feminism, right? Here’s her list of accomplishments:
I constantly challenge myself, as first lady, to think beyond the traditional responsibilities of the East Wing. That has resulted in many new opportunities, including leading four reunifications of Ukrainian and Russian children with their families, addressing the U.N. Security Council on achieving peace through education, and, at the White House, launching Fostering the Future Together, a global effort to help children thrive through the safe and innovative use of technology. But family always comes first.
(Emphasis added) Does she know the East Wing has been torn down?
The Voting Right Act decision fallout:
I don’t really want to write about redistricting, even thought that still seems to be the leading story today. Dakinikat did a great job with that topic yesterday.
I’ll just share this interesting piece by Carl Hulse in The New York Times (gift article): How Minority Districts Fueled the G.O.P.’s Southern Ascendancy in Congress.
Representative James E. Clyburn of South Carolina, formerly the No. 3 Democrat in the House, is certain he would never have been elected to Congress without changes in the Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court determined last week amounted to unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.
“And about half of the members of the Congressional Black Caucus wouldn’t be there,” said Mr. Clyburn, the first African American sent to Congress from his state since Reconstruction. He was part of the historic 1992 class of Black and Hispanic lawmakers elected after new maps were drawn to comply with 1982 changes meant to strengthen the Voting Rights Act.
The predominantly Democratic minority groups that set to work back then to increase their representation were boosted by some unlikely allies: Republican strategists who saw an opportunity to break the Democratic hold on the South and force an extraordinary realignment.
Now, Republicans see the chance to cement their grip on the region — and to try to maintain their thin House majority — by eliminating the minority districts that initially worked to their advantage and to take those seats for their own.
It is the latest chapter in an ongoing political saga that has had profound implications for the House of Representatives over the past three decades. Redistricting in minority communities could again be a major factor in deciding the November elections as Republicans try to lessen the traditional midterm advantages for the party out of power — the Democrats in this case — in a year when they face particularly strong headwinds.
Having consolidated their power throughout the South, Republicans are now emboldened to try to eliminate the majority-minority districts, believing they can carry them without risking their strength elsewhere as Democratic-leaning minority voters are dispersed into other districts.
Are they right?
But as Republicans and Democrats have both seen as they have waged a tit-for-tat battle this year to redraw districts around the country to their advantage, such changes do not always work out as planned. The true consequences of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling remain to be seen.
The G.O.P. may find it more difficult to win in more diverse districts of the kind that existed before the reshuffling of maps prompted by the Voting Rights Act.
And Democrats now must decide whether they want to maintain the predominantly minority districts they once demanded as a matter of basic fairness or try to turn the tables on Republicans in blue states and reconfigure them in an effort to threaten G.O.P. lawmakers in those states.
In the late 1980s, Republicans had been deep in the House minority for nearly 40 years. But growing dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party had begun moving white Southern conservatives into the Republican ranks, as illustrated by high-profile party switches in Washington. Then the redistricting initiated under a series of court decisions aimed at fostering more minority representation provided yet another opening that might have seemed counterintuitive at first glance.
Architects of the maps realized that if they could maximize Black and Hispanic representation in the new districts, they would simultaneously dilute Democratic strength in surrounding jurisdictions where coalitions of white and Black voters had elected white Democrats for decades. The shift would ultimately create dozens of openings for Republican candidates in what had formerly been known as Democrats’ “Solid South.”
Hulse’s argument is interesting. He also notes that
Some civil rights figures such as Representative John Lewis, the Georgia Democrat, warned at the time that the new maps could empower Republicans by weakening the partnership of progressive white and Black voters in the South. But others said the new districts were the only way to overcome centuries of institutional discrimination against minorities in the region.
“Gerrymandering was done to keep Black folks out,” Mr. Clyburn said. “If you gerrymander to keep them out, you’ve got to gerrymander to bring them in.”
Who was right? We may find out in November. Use the gift link to read the rest.
In other voting news, It seems Sam Alito cheated in his opinion on the Voting Rights case. Sam Levine, Will Craft and Andrew Witherspoon at The Guardian: Samuel Alito’s Voting Rights Act ruling cited misleading data from DoJ.
The claims Samuel Alito, a supreme court justice, made about voter turnout in Louisiana in a landmark Voting Rights Act case were based on a misleading data analysis, a Guardian review has found.
In his opinion gutting section 2 of the Voting Rights Act last week, Alito said that Black voter turnout had exceeded white voter turnout in two of the five most recent presidential elections, both nationally and in Louisiana. Alito’s claim was copied almost verbatim from a friend-of-the-court brief filed by the justice department. It was a critical data point Alito used to make the argument that the kind of discrimination that once made the Voting Rights Act necessary no longer exists.
“Vast social change has occurred throughout the country and particularly in the South, where many Section 2 suits arise,” Alito wrote in a majority opinion in the case, which concerned Louisiana’s congressional map, joined by the five other conservative justices on the court. “Black voters now participate in elections at similar rates as the rest of the electorate, even turning out at higher rates than whitJuson piece in The New York Times (gift article): Hegseth Says This War Has Cost $25 Billion. I Tallied Up the True Amount.
The Defense Department says the conflict with Iran has cost taxpayers $25 billion so far. But this tally significantly understates the true cost. By my calculations, the bill for a typical American household likely runs to thousands — or even tens of thousands — of dollars.
Yes, that’s a wide range; blame the economic fog of war. But what’s clear is that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is trying to obscure just how expensive this war will be.
The Pentagon’s stated number reflects only a narrow accounting of the tab that Operation Epic Fury is running up. It’s the price of the more than 2,000 Tomahawk and Patriot missiles already fired, the warplanes already flown and in some cases lost, and the rest of the gear already chewed through. It does not measure the true cost of the war — including the human toll. Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, acknowledged as much when he told the House Budget Committee on April 15, “I don’t have a ballpark for you.”
I do. Since the start of the war, oil markets have been disrupted, and consumer confidence has cratered. The global economy is groaning, and military budgets are growing. The toll from this upheaval must be counted in lives disrupted, jobs lost, companies shut down (see: Spirit Airlines), and the income and output sacrificed. The less easily quantified costs — death, disability and mental health — could become much more dramatic should President Trump send troops into Iran, which still can’t be ruled out.
Start with oil. While the White House is keen to tell you that oil markets will bounce back to normal, futures markets disagree. Futures prices for oil at the end of 2026, 2027 and 2028 are all still sitting well above where they were before the start of the war. Indeed, the November 2026 futures price of West Texas Intermediate hit a new high this week at $86.12 a barrel. It could be that oil traders are pricing in near-term disruption. Or perhaps they see the current episode as raising the risk of future disruption. Either would be expensive.
The rise in geopolitical risk is costly. Recent research by the Fed economists Dario Caldara and Matteo Iacoviello suggests that heightened geopolitical risk leads to lower investment and employment and dramatically raises the chances of an economic disaster. Their measure of this risk has skyrocketed, and their estimates of the effect of risk on the economy suggest a cost of about $200 billion, with a million fewer Americans working in a year.
The war has also pushed the Federal Reserve Bank into a corner. Back in February, many economists expected a couple of rate cuts this year; markets now think that’s unlikely. If the Fed raises rates, it may succeed at beating back a war-fueled burst of inflation, but only by destroying hundreds of thousands of jobs and edging the economy closer to recession. A reasonable guesstimate — informed by the Fed’s own models — is that this will cost the economy about $200 billion.
Use the gift link to read the rest.
One more on Iran from Jonathan Lemire at The Atlantic (gift article): Trump Is ‘Bored’ With the War He Started.
President Trump really, really wants the war with Iran to end. He has declared victory many times, including about three weeks ago, when Iran briefly reopened the Strait of Hormuz. He has repeatedly extended his cease-fire deadlines instead of following through on his (sometimes-apocalyptic) threats to resume hostilities. This week, his administration abruptly abandoned an effort to escort ships through the strait in part because of a fear that it could provoke violent, escalating confrontations.
Trump is tired of the war, which has proved far more difficult and lasted far longer than he had expected. His party is warily watching rising gas prices and falling poll numbers. He doesn’t want to be bogged down in a Middle East conflict like some of his predecessors were. He doesn’t want it to upend his high-stakes summit next week in China. He is ready to move on.
Trump is left with a vexing question: How do you end a war when your opponent won’t budge? And while Trump grasps for an exit, the hard-liners in Tehran have used the war to tighten their grip on power. Iran seems hell-bent on pulling off something it’s historically done well: humiliating an American president.
Trump never thought it would turn out like this. After the impressive military operation to snatch Nicolás Maduro from Caracas, the president set his eyes on Iran, telling confidants that it would “be another Venezuela,” a pair of outside advisers told me. They, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal strategy. Trump believed that the U.S. military was unstoppable, and that he had a chance to topple Tehran’s theocracy, a prize that had eluded his predecessors. He was redrawing the world’s maps and expected a victory to come in days, a week or two at most. The initial U.S.-Israel onslaught killed Iran’s supreme leader and included waves of bombings that reportedly obliterated much of the country’s missile capabilities. But Tehran did not capitulate, and instead attacked its Persian Gulf neighbors and seized control of the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of the world’s oil passes. With a mix of mines, small attack boats, and drones, Iran effectively closed the waterway. Energy prices soared. The conflict settled into a stalemate and then a fragile cease-fire. One high-profile, official round of negotiations failed. No more are scheduled….
…the real question is the timing: A number of experts have forecast that Iran can withstand pressure from the blockade for months, not weeks. A U.S. intelligence assessment delivered to policy makers this week agrees, suggesting that Iran could make it at least three or four more months. If so, and Iran continues to keep the strait closed, then prices will continue to rise in the West, including in the United States during a midterm-election year. It then becomes a matter of pain: Which side can withstand the most economic hardship?
Use the gift link to read more.
The Hantavirus outbreak:
NBC News: 7 states prepare to receive Americans possibly exposed to hantavirus.
The U.S. has entered emergency response mode as a cruise ship hit by a deadly hantavirus outbreak sails toward Tenerife, one of Spain’s Canary Islands, where it will evacuate nearly 150 passengers on board, including at least 17 Americans.
State and local health officials in the U.S. are monitoring at least eight passengers who disembarked on April 24 and returned home. For the time being, those individuals are not being told to isolate, since they have not developed symptoms.
As early as Sunday, global health authorities will help transport passengers still on board the ship — all of whom are currently asymptomatic — to their respective home countries. Passengers will be taken to a “completely isolated, cordoned-off” area in Tenerife, then board guarded vehicles to transport them to a section of the local airport that will also be cordoned off, Virginia Barcones, Spain’s head of emergency services, said Thursday at a press conference.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Friday in a statement that it is sending a team of epidemiologists and medical professionals to the Canary Islands to meet the Americans on board, who will fly to Nebraska upon arrival.
“Because the disease status of the exposed passengers is unknown and responders will be in close contact with potentially symptomatic individuals, it makes sense for emergency responders to don gloves (rubber or latex), a respirator mask like an n95, a protective gown, and eye protection,” a CDC epidemiologist who did not speak on behalf of the agency said in a text message.
The flight will land at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha, Nebraska. The repatriated passengers will then be transported to the National Quarantine Unit at the Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha. It’s unknown how long the quarantine will last.
AP: Experts wonder ‘Where is the CDC?’ as a hantavirus outbreak unfolds on a cruise ship.
No quick dispatching of disease investigators. No televised news conference to inform the public. No timely health alerts to doctors.
In the midst of a hantavirus outbreak that involves Americans and is making headlines around the world, the U.S. government’s top public health agency, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been uncharacteristically missing in action, according to a number of experts.
To President Donald Trump, “We seem to have things under very good control,” as he told reporters Friday evening.
To experts, the situation aboard a cruise ship has not spiraled because, unlike COVID-19 or measles or the flu, hantavirus does not spread easily. It has been health experts in other countries, not the United States, who have been dealing primarily with the outbreak in the past week.
“The CDC is not even a player,” said Lawrence Gostin, an international public health expert at Georgetown University. “I’ve never seen that before.”
Not until late Friday did CDC actions accelerate.
Health officials confirmed the deployment of a team to Spain’s Canary Islands, where the ship was expected to arrive early Sunday local time, to meet the Americans onboard. They said a second team will go to Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska as part of a plan to evacuate American passengers from the ship to a University of Nebraska quarantine center for evaluation and monitoring. Also, the CDC issued its first health alert to U.S. doctors, advising them of the possibility of imported cases.
There’s more at the link. I guess RFK Jr. doesn’t think this outbreak is that concerning. The scary thing is that it can take weeks for the symptoms to show up in a person who has been exposed, and 38 percent of people who get the disease die. And it can be spread person to person.
That’s it for me today. What’s on your mind?
#catPhotos #caturday #CDC #costOfTheIranWar #DonaldTrump #gerrymandering #hantavirus #IranWar #JeffBezos #JustinWolfers #MelaniaTrump #mothers #SamuelAlito #VotingRightsAct -
Lazy Caturday Reads
Good Day!!
Tomorrow, May 10, is Mothers Day. My Mother is no longer alive, but I still talk to her frequently. I think of her every day and take comfort in remembering stories she told me and the many times she encouraged me.
Tomorrow is also the day I stopped drinking, way back in 1982. I can’t believe it will be 44 years! My mother was visiting me on those first days of sobriety. No one believed I could do it, but somehow I knew that day that I was really going to stop drinking this time. I think having my Mom there with me helped, even though she wasn’t sure I could do it either. I love you Mom.
In the “news,” Jeff Bezos’ newspaper, The Washington Post, has seen fit to publish an “opinion” piece, supposedly written by Melania Trump. Obviously, she didn’t write it, even though it’s incredibly simplistic. Here’s bit of it: Mothers are America’s strength.
A mother’s devotion to her child is unmatched. This love takes many forms: strength, compassion, wisdom, grace, joy, labor, humor and even grief, to name a few. The love between mother and child has helped shape America’s identity since the nation’s founding 250 years ago.
It is time to revisit the enduring American family traditions that have supported generations, while also recognizing the challenges for mothers of building both a career and a home. This balancing act reflects the realities women face today.
America’s strength is closely tied to the role mothers play in shaping character, education and moral order within families. From morning until night, mothers serve as the first teachers of empathy, aspiration and discipline. It is mothers who do so much to shape a child’s mind — how to think, how to distinguish right from wrong and how to persevere in challenging times.
The household is our nation’s smallest institution, yet it is the foundation of all others, including democracy itself. The values cultivated in homes often shape the moral voice of the next generation. Looking ahead, we must consider how to strengthen this vital role.
Being a modern mother demands the discipline and restraint to not disregard what came before us. In this spirit, the healthy evolution of the American family can best be achieved by preserving the elements of the past that have proved their worth. In doing so, America can restore the honor of motherhood after years in which feminism often placed career above family, with consequences to our nation.
There just had to be a dig at feminism, right? Here’s her list of accomplishments:
I constantly challenge myself, as first lady, to think beyond the traditional responsibilities of the East Wing. That has resulted in many new opportunities, including leading four reunifications of Ukrainian and Russian children with their families, addressing the U.N. Security Council on achieving peace through education, and, at the White House, launching Fostering the Future Together, a global effort to help children thrive through the safe and innovative use of technology. But family always comes first.
(Emphasis added) Does she know the East Wing has been torn down?
The Voting Right Act decision fallout:
I don’t really want to write about redistricting, even thought that still seems to be the leading story today. Dakinikat did a great job with that topic yesterday.
I’ll just share this interesting piece by Carl Hulse in The New York Times (gift article): How Minority Districts Fueled the G.O.P.’s Southern Ascendancy in Congress.
Representative James E. Clyburn of South Carolina, formerly the No. 3 Democrat in the House, is certain he would never have been elected to Congress without changes in the Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court determined last week amounted to unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.
“And about half of the members of the Congressional Black Caucus wouldn’t be there,” said Mr. Clyburn, the first African American sent to Congress from his state since Reconstruction. He was part of the historic 1992 class of Black and Hispanic lawmakers elected after new maps were drawn to comply with 1982 changes meant to strengthen the Voting Rights Act.
The predominantly Democratic minority groups that set to work back then to increase their representation were boosted by some unlikely allies: Republican strategists who saw an opportunity to break the Democratic hold on the South and force an extraordinary realignment.
Now, Republicans see the chance to cement their grip on the region — and to try to maintain their thin House majority — by eliminating the minority districts that initially worked to their advantage and to take those seats for their own.
It is the latest chapter in an ongoing political saga that has had profound implications for the House of Representatives over the past three decades. Redistricting in minority communities could again be a major factor in deciding the November elections as Republicans try to lessen the traditional midterm advantages for the party out of power — the Democrats in this case — in a year when they face particularly strong headwinds.
Having consolidated their power throughout the South, Republicans are now emboldened to try to eliminate the majority-minority districts, believing they can carry them without risking their strength elsewhere as Democratic-leaning minority voters are dispersed into other districts.
Are they right?
But as Republicans and Democrats have both seen as they have waged a tit-for-tat battle this year to redraw districts around the country to their advantage, such changes do not always work out as planned. The true consequences of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling remain to be seen.
The G.O.P. may find it more difficult to win in more diverse districts of the kind that existed before the reshuffling of maps prompted by the Voting Rights Act.
And Democrats now must decide whether they want to maintain the predominantly minority districts they once demanded as a matter of basic fairness or try to turn the tables on Republicans in blue states and reconfigure them in an effort to threaten G.O.P. lawmakers in those states.
In the late 1980s, Republicans had been deep in the House minority for nearly 40 years. But growing dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party had begun moving white Southern conservatives into the Republican ranks, as illustrated by high-profile party switches in Washington. Then the redistricting initiated under a series of court decisions aimed at fostering more minority representation provided yet another opening that might have seemed counterintuitive at first glance.
Architects of the maps realized that if they could maximize Black and Hispanic representation in the new districts, they would simultaneously dilute Democratic strength in surrounding jurisdictions where coalitions of white and Black voters had elected white Democrats for decades. The shift would ultimately create dozens of openings for Republican candidates in what had formerly been known as Democrats’ “Solid South.”
Hulse’s argument is interesting. He also notes that
Some civil rights figures such as Representative John Lewis, the Georgia Democrat, warned at the time that the new maps could empower Republicans by weakening the partnership of progressive white and Black voters in the South. But others said the new districts were the only way to overcome centuries of institutional discrimination against minorities in the region.
“Gerrymandering was done to keep Black folks out,” Mr. Clyburn said. “If you gerrymander to keep them out, you’ve got to gerrymander to bring them in.”
Who was right? We may find out in November. Use the gift link to read the rest.
In other voting news, It seems Sam Alito cheated in his opinion on the Voting Rights case. Sam Levine, Will Craft and Andrew Witherspoon at The Guardian: Samuel Alito’s Voting Rights Act ruling cited misleading data from DoJ.
The claims Samuel Alito, a supreme court justice, made about voter turnout in Louisiana in a landmark Voting Rights Act case were based on a misleading data analysis, a Guardian review has found.
In his opinion gutting section 2 of the Voting Rights Act last week, Alito said that Black voter turnout had exceeded white voter turnout in two of the five most recent presidential elections, both nationally and in Louisiana. Alito’s claim was copied almost verbatim from a friend-of-the-court brief filed by the justice department. It was a critical data point Alito used to make the argument that the kind of discrimination that once made the Voting Rights Act necessary no longer exists.
“Vast social change has occurred throughout the country and particularly in the South, where many Section 2 suits arise,” Alito wrote in a majority opinion in the case, which concerned Louisiana’s congressional map, joined by the five other conservative justices on the court. “Black voters now participate in elections at similar rates as the rest of the electorate, even turning out at higher rates than whitJuson piece in The New York Times (gift article): Hegseth Says This War Has Cost $25 Billion. I Tallied Up the True Amount.
The Defense Department says the conflict with Iran has cost taxpayers $25 billion so far. But this tally significantly understates the true cost. By my calculations, the bill for a typical American household likely runs to thousands — or even tens of thousands — of dollars.
Yes, that’s a wide range; blame the economic fog of war. But what’s clear is that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is trying to obscure just how expensive this war will be.
The Pentagon’s stated number reflects only a narrow accounting of the tab that Operation Epic Fury is running up. It’s the price of the more than 2,000 Tomahawk and Patriot missiles already fired, the warplanes already flown and in some cases lost, and the rest of the gear already chewed through. It does not measure the true cost of the war — including the human toll. Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, acknowledged as much when he told the House Budget Committee on April 15, “I don’t have a ballpark for you.”
I do. Since the start of the war, oil markets have been disrupted, and consumer confidence has cratered. The global economy is groaning, and military budgets are growing. The toll from this upheaval must be counted in lives disrupted, jobs lost, companies shut down (see: Spirit Airlines), and the income and output sacrificed. The less easily quantified costs — death, disability and mental health — could become much more dramatic should President Trump send troops into Iran, which still can’t be ruled out.
Start with oil. While the White House is keen to tell you that oil markets will bounce back to normal, futures markets disagree. Futures prices for oil at the end of 2026, 2027 and 2028 are all still sitting well above where they were before the start of the war. Indeed, the November 2026 futures price of West Texas Intermediate hit a new high this week at $86.12 a barrel. It could be that oil traders are pricing in near-term disruption. Or perhaps they see the current episode as raising the risk of future disruption. Either would be expensive.
The rise in geopolitical risk is costly. Recent research by the Fed economists Dario Caldara and Matteo Iacoviello suggests that heightened geopolitical risk leads to lower investment and employment and dramatically raises the chances of an economic disaster. Their measure of this risk has skyrocketed, and their estimates of the effect of risk on the economy suggest a cost of about $200 billion, with a million fewer Americans working in a year.
The war has also pushed the Federal Reserve Bank into a corner. Back in February, many economists expected a couple of rate cuts this year; markets now think that’s unlikely. If the Fed raises rates, it may succeed at beating back a war-fueled burst of inflation, but only by destroying hundreds of thousands of jobs and edging the economy closer to recession. A reasonable guesstimate — informed by the Fed’s own models — is that this will cost the economy about $200 billion.
Use the gift link to read the rest.
One more on Iran from Jonathan Lemire at The Atlantic (gift article): Trump Is ‘Bored’ With the War He Started.
President Trump really, really wants the war with Iran to end. He has declared victory many times, including about three weeks ago, when Iran briefly reopened the Strait of Hormuz. He has repeatedly extended his cease-fire deadlines instead of following through on his (sometimes-apocalyptic) threats to resume hostilities. This week, his administration abruptly abandoned an effort to escort ships through the strait in part because of a fear that it could provoke violent, escalating confrontations.
Trump is tired of the war, which has proved far more difficult and lasted far longer than he had expected. His party is warily watching rising gas prices and falling poll numbers. He doesn’t want to be bogged down in a Middle East conflict like some of his predecessors were. He doesn’t want it to upend his high-stakes summit next week in China. He is ready to move on.
Trump is left with a vexing question: How do you end a war when your opponent won’t budge? And while Trump grasps for an exit, the hard-liners in Tehran have used the war to tighten their grip on power. Iran seems hell-bent on pulling off something it’s historically done well: humiliating an American president.
Trump never thought it would turn out like this. After the impressive military operation to snatch Nicolás Maduro from Caracas, the president set his eyes on Iran, telling confidants that it would “be another Venezuela,” a pair of outside advisers told me. They, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal strategy. Trump believed that the U.S. military was unstoppable, and that he had a chance to topple Tehran’s theocracy, a prize that had eluded his predecessors. He was redrawing the world’s maps and expected a victory to come in days, a week or two at most. The initial U.S.-Israel onslaught killed Iran’s supreme leader and included waves of bombings that reportedly obliterated much of the country’s missile capabilities. But Tehran did not capitulate, and instead attacked its Persian Gulf neighbors and seized control of the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of the world’s oil passes. With a mix of mines, small attack boats, and drones, Iran effectively closed the waterway. Energy prices soared. The conflict settled into a stalemate and then a fragile cease-fire. One high-profile, official round of negotiations failed. No more are scheduled….
…the real question is the timing: A number of experts have forecast that Iran can withstand pressure from the blockade for months, not weeks. A U.S. intelligence assessment delivered to policy makers this week agrees, suggesting that Iran could make it at least three or four more months. If so, and Iran continues to keep the strait closed, then prices will continue to rise in the West, including in the United States during a midterm-election year. It then becomes a matter of pain: Which side can withstand the most economic hardship?
Use the gift link to read more.
The Hantavirus outbreak:
NBC News: 7 states prepare to receive Americans possibly exposed to hantavirus.
The U.S. has entered emergency response mode as a cruise ship hit by a deadly hantavirus outbreak sails toward Tenerife, one of Spain’s Canary Islands, where it will evacuate nearly 150 passengers on board, including at least 17 Americans.
State and local health officials in the U.S. are monitoring at least eight passengers who disembarked on April 24 and returned home. For the time being, those individuals are not being told to isolate, since they have not developed symptoms.
As early as Sunday, global health authorities will help transport passengers still on board the ship — all of whom are currently asymptomatic — to their respective home countries. Passengers will be taken to a “completely isolated, cordoned-off” area in Tenerife, then board guarded vehicles to transport them to a section of the local airport that will also be cordoned off, Virginia Barcones, Spain’s head of emergency services, said Thursday at a press conference.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Friday in a statement that it is sending a team of epidemiologists and medical professionals to the Canary Islands to meet the Americans on board, who will fly to Nebraska upon arrival.
“Because the disease status of the exposed passengers is unknown and responders will be in close contact with potentially symptomatic individuals, it makes sense for emergency responders to don gloves (rubber or latex), a respirator mask like an n95, a protective gown, and eye protection,” a CDC epidemiologist who did not speak on behalf of the agency said in a text message.
The flight will land at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha, Nebraska. The repatriated passengers will then be transported to the National Quarantine Unit at the Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha. It’s unknown how long the quarantine will last.
AP: Experts wonder ‘Where is the CDC?’ as a hantavirus outbreak unfolds on a cruise ship.
No quick dispatching of disease investigators. No televised news conference to inform the public. No timely health alerts to doctors.
In the midst of a hantavirus outbreak that involves Americans and is making headlines around the world, the U.S. government’s top public health agency, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been uncharacteristically missing in action, according to a number of experts.
To President Donald Trump, “We seem to have things under very good control,” as he told reporters Friday evening.
To experts, the situation aboard a cruise ship has not spiraled because, unlike COVID-19 or measles or the flu, hantavirus does not spread easily. It has been health experts in other countries, not the United States, who have been dealing primarily with the outbreak in the past week.
“The CDC is not even a player,” said Lawrence Gostin, an international public health expert at Georgetown University. “I’ve never seen that before.”
Not until late Friday did CDC actions accelerate.
Health officials confirmed the deployment of a team to Spain’s Canary Islands, where the ship was expected to arrive early Sunday local time, to meet the Americans onboard. They said a second team will go to Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska as part of a plan to evacuate American passengers from the ship to a University of Nebraska quarantine center for evaluation and monitoring. Also, the CDC issued its first health alert to U.S. doctors, advising them of the possibility of imported cases.
There’s more at the link. I guess RFK Jr. doesn’t think this outbreak is that concerning. The scary thing is that it can take weeks for the symptoms to show up in a person who has been exposed, and 38 percent of people who get the disease die. And it can be spread person to person.
That’s it for me today. What’s on your mind?
#catPhotos #caturday #CDC #costOfTheIranWar #DonaldTrump #gerrymandering #hantavirus #IranWar #JeffBezos #JustinWolfers #MelaniaTrump #mothers #SamuelAlito #VotingRightsAct -
Message in a Bottle 📨
#ThePolice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr2urVHWOa8 -
Message in a Bottle 📨
#ThePolice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr2urVHWOa8 -
Message in a Bottle 📨
#ThePolice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr2urVHWOa8 -
Message in a Bottle 📨
#ThePolice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr2urVHWOa8 -
Message in a Bottle 📨
#ThePolice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr2urVHWOa8 -
“ #thepolice #sting #70smusic Live performance by The Police with 'Message in a Bottle' on Dutch popshow “Countdown”.... / “The Police - Message in A Bottle | Early live version on Countdown (1979)” (1 user) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6odE4PlXyWw
-
ISO One Fabulous Parasol
I have no idea how to shop for a #Parasol or how to #LazyWeb my way to that knowledge sans this lazy web post.
I would LOVE to buy from an artisan. OH, I just remembered I found that not-a-coven group of women making period clothing … I can also ask them. Okay, but still this message in a bottle.
In Search Of One Fabulous Parasol
Parsol MUST:
be and look FABULOUS; doesn't have to be queer themed, but I'd hop on a quality Trans pride parasol
protect me from the sun; I'm going to sit and picket with it
NOT come from Amazon or an effective equivalent; could come from Etsy but ick; would love to connect directly with Fedi artisans or their collectives
-
Wednesday’s Quick Hits
- When guns aren’t available
- The Andromeda Strain
- More on Democrat Cities
- Bigger Versions of Left-Wing Cities
- Muslim Mass Killing of Christians
- A Nuked Country Can be a Better Country
When guns aren’t available
Let’s start with something fun. This guy is freakishly good.
https://twitter.com/Rainmaker1973/status/2038622272844636321
News has finally emerged about the NASA astronaut whose illness resulted in an “evacuation” of the four members of Expedition 74 from the ISS a few weeks before the scheduled end of their mission. The astronaut who was sick has been identified, and what he was suffering from:
Astronaut Mike Fincke, who has been to space four times, told the Associated Press that he was struck with the illness while eating dinner. He briefly lost the ability to speak. “He couldn’t talk and remembers no pain, but his anxious crewmates jumped into action after seeing him in distress and requested help from flight surgeons on the ground,”
Sort of:
Fincke said he’s been enjoying time with his family back on Earth. “We couldn’t tell. It was one of those things that the doctors are still scratching their heads,” according to Fincke. He didn’t have a stroke or heart attack, the data showed. “We cleared out all the really tough things,” he added. “We are almost 100% sure that this is a space-related thing.”
Well at least nothing burst out of his chest!
More on Democrat Cities
Groan! I just did a piece on how to clean up Chicago and other Democrat cities and now this on the infamous Red Line…
When you pray for metal fatigue
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWgkWAQjUgu/
Those rear doors are locked to prevent this sort of insanity, and I can’t see how he could squeeze out of the windows. The guy concerned will be walking the streets of Chicago tomorrow and who knows what other excitements he will seek.
NYC Residents meet Menken’s Good and Hard Rule
It’s good that the city is building a homeless shelter for about 150 men suffering from the usual factors of homeless men; drug addiction and mental health issues.
It’s bad that they’re putting it in the middle of an ordinary neighbourhood:
https://twitter.com/ABC7NY/status/2038543233555341685
Mamdani thinks he can put homeless shelters in any neighborhood he wants because he wants the homeless to feel like they are at home, because maybe being around families will rehabilitate them. He could put shelters anywhere in the city, but he chooses to put them right in the middle of our neighborhood. He doesn’t care about the danger that poses to us. Look at all the cops that showed up tonight. Will the cops show up when some homeless drug addict lays his hands on a child?
Exactly, but the politicians don’t have to worry about that last: the following is a reference to Chicago Mayor Johnson, but it applies to any of the Democrat pollies.
The NYC protest happened in an Asian neighbourhood but we all know that Asians are just White Supremacist Adjacent so they’ll be ignored, and in any case almost half of them – 49.1% percent – voted for Zohran Mamdani.
Why Crime Flourishes in Minnesota.
Even after all the publicity about the massive amounts of fraud that the local Somali community have pulled against the Minnesota welfare agencies, the message still doesn’t get through to the forces of Law and Order in Democrat places.
https://twitter.com/KSTP/status/2038649718356459881
One year for $250 million is not a bad deal. Plus a quick reminder that local political star lIhan Omar (Somalia) was also in the middle of this fraud:
- Ilhan Omar Promoted “Feed Our Future”
- Ilhan Omar Volunteered at “Feed Our Future”
- Illhan Omar got Donations from “Feed Our Future”
Governor Tim “Chorus Dancer” Walz is also quite open about the motivating factor, if not actually yelling “We Love Being Ripped Off” in public.
https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/2037980587596591235
Providence, Rhode Island Wipes Iryna Zarutska from history
Some victims are deserving of being memorialised, like Saint George I stick this gun in your pregnant belly Floyd, because their memory brings us together.
But other victims are – what’s the word – forgettable, problematic…??
The mural, located on the exterior of The Dark Lady, an LGBTQ+ club in downtown Providence, remains incomplete, WJAR-TV reported. The office of Mayor Brett Smiley told the news outlet that he wants the artwork taken down.
“The murder of the individual depicted in this mural was a devastating tragedy, but the misguided, isolating intent of those funding murals like the one across the county is divisive and does not represent Providence,” Smiley said in a statement.Oh right, “divisive”. Divisive was the word I was looking for. Even the LGBTQ+ connection could not save the mural.
What a cunt Mayor Smiley is – and he’ll probably be re-elected by his Democrat voters.
However, his best efforts, I don’t think the Memory Hole works that well anymore and Iryna Zarutska will not be forgotten – and neither will shitty political and ideological efforts to wipe her away.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/2003244574127653327
Bigger Versions of Left-Wing Cities
Strangely enough scaling up the likes of such cities to the Nation-State level doesn’t work either.
Canada
https://twitter.com/ksorbs/status/2036937420646609336
To be fair if I was ruled by the likes of the NDP (New Democrat Party) I might to commit suicide too. No Canadian Left-wing government can win power without the NDP’s support. The following is very funny, if unintentionally so.
https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/2038278734705512888
Spain
Father loses legal fight to halt euthanasia of 25-year-old daughter… Noelia Castillo Ramos’ case galvanized international attention after her father, Gerónimo Castillo, mounted a legal battle against the authorization of various Spanish courts for his daughter to receive euthanasia in 2023. Aided by Abogados Cristianos (Christian Lawyers), a conservative Catholic organization, Mr. Castillo exhausted all appeals to the Spanish courts.
The father argued that his daughter wasn’t fully psychologically able to make a decision regarding euthanasia and that she needed better medical and psychiatric care. His legal battle was ultimately shut down by the European Court for Human Rights in Strasbourg, France, on March 10.In her brief, awful life she had been:
- Removed from her parents after their divorce.
- Tried to commit suicide twice (saved by her mother once).
- Sexually abused by her boyfriend.
- Attempted rape in a nightclub.
- Gang raped in the state care home she was placed in.
- Attempted suicide again by jumping off the home’s fifth floor. Survived, if that’s the word.
- Refused privately-funded care offered by numerous wealth (and non-wealthy) people
But in the end, like Canada, it was simpler (and cheaper) for the State to just kill her.
Nations cannot survive when their cultures are this sick.
Muslim Mass Killing of Christians
Also known as No Protests!
https://twitter.com/VividProwess/status/2038427239360925747
https://twitter.com/EYakoby/status/2038746476440854955
A Nuked Country Can be a Better Country
After all that incredibly depressing news there is this from Japan, which has a weird sub-culture (aren’t all Japanese sub-cultures such?) of loving the United States. Cute, but where are the Daisy Dukes?
https://twitter.com/Richard_Harambe/status/2038316228557607108
#Canada #CanadianPolitics #Chicago #Crime #DemocratCities #Euthanasia #FraudAndGrifting #Minneapolis #NewYorkCityNYCAndState #SoftOnCrime #Space #ViolentCrime #WokeIdentityPolitics -
Gift guide for nerds like me
Maybe you know some people like me — nerds, happily embracing their hobbies that were once considered abnormal but are now mainstream enough they sell out arenas.
Most who read this blog are here for the dungeons and the dragons. Communal storytelling with dice and friends is what unites us. You probably already have the core elements of the games you love, but your family still wants to get you things over the holidays that stretch from late November to early January. Pass them this guide.
- Almost all links are direct to the supplier or to Bookshop.org. When you can, shop locally and/or directly.
Our hobbies and communities grow with support.
For the experienced roleplaying game fanatic
First off, expand their Appendix N. The Tolkien-esque stories that founded fantasy RPGs are well known. There’s so much more available now.
The Hunger and The Dusk volumes 1 and 2 (Bookshop links) tell tales of romance between orcs and humans fighting aliens in a world that’s dying. G Willow Wilson wrote other stories as well, many which fit a fantasy motif, but none apply directly to D&D like The Hunger and The Dusk.
Lev Grossman’s works like The Magicians and Bright Sword take familiar tales (Narnia & King Arthur) and twist them up. Also on my TBR pile are Children of Blood & Bone, The Fifth Season and Brigands & Breadknives.
Expand their 5e games outside of Wizards of the Coast. Your RPG nerd friends already buy themselves the official D&D products they want. But you can help them incorporate wider tales.
- Labyrinth Worldbook from Kobold Press as part of Tales of the Valiant a 5e system.
- Game Master’s Guide from Kobold Press is one of the best collections of advice and subsystems (so I’ve heard). I don’t have either of these yet.
- Worlds To-Go: The Elysians and Crafting Heritages, Cultures and More: Worldbuilding from Homebrew & Hacking both feature sections by me! These focus on A5e as the base rules, but work well in your D&D game, of course.
- Making Enemies from Keith Amman is his latest guide to better monsters for fantasy games. As usual Keith focuses on expanding stat blocks into tactics, but in Making Enemies he gets into how to build those stat blocks for several systems.
Try other games! Talk to your friend and see what they already have or where their interests lie. There are a lot of other popular RPGs out right now. While Daggerheart and Draw Steel are supported by some of my mutuals on Mastodon. The one that intrigues me the most is the forthcoming Plotweaver system. It is the engine behind the Cosmere RPG and supports political stories beyond what D&D does.
Twilight:2000‘s update is a fun read of the classic post-nuclear exchange apocalypse game that helped me consider the Army. Song of the River Prince is a more cozy fantasy. With light mechanics and tales quite different from the high fantasy of D&D.
You can always get your geek new dice (Artisan Dice are my dream) or support a mapmaker (Deven Rue or Dyson Logos are two I enjoy) in their name. Or order a custom map. Someday the World of the Everflow, Telse and The Ferments will get custom maps. My favorite dice box maker is Elderwood Academy. A gift card to Hero Forge works too.
There are other options, but those are some of my favorites.
For the newbie
While the Tales of the Valiant Starter Set is below $15, get it. Or, stick to the WotC products because your nibblings or friends’ kids don’t want the off brand stuff. I grew up with the Odyssey video game system and Gobots. I get it — sometimes finances mean support how you can.
But when the price isn’t significantly different get;
- Stranger Things: Welcome to the Hellfire Club if they are into Stranger things.
- Heroes of the Borderlands Starter Set for those that aren’t. Both of those are designed to welcome new people to D&D.
The battle boards from Beedle & Grim’s look great for a not-quite newbie or someone who consistently plays the same class. I’m currently running an Artificer, and Rogues are my second most played class.
And for those who want to be a newbie DM, Return to the Lazy Dungeon Master is the best collection of simple advice to focus on the players, their characters and empowering their story options.
Those shopping in the Renton area should support Shane’s Cards & Games, Wizard Keep Games and Mox Boarding House.
For flavor dorks
My preferred geeky coffee is Found Familiar. My current favorite is Fae Magic. My preferred geeky tea is Friday Afternoon Tea. It helps that they’re local-ish too. A friend recently tried Many Worlds Tavern. I’m looking forward to a flavor report.
For coffees in the South Sound area, I recommend Campfire, Bluebeard, and Boon Boona. I swing by Macadons and Common Ground for sweets.
Beer people should head to The Brewmaster’s Taproom. My go to wine shop is All Things Wine and when in Walla Walla I support Tempus (we’re in the club), Sleight of Hand (also in SoDo), Balboa and Echolands. If you ever tour the dub-dub send me a message. It’s a fun town for those that love flavor experiences.
For finer liquors I enjoyed a taste of The Dalmore recently and would love more. It was a rare scotch that my non-peaty-preferring wife would enjoy with its softer, luxurious mouth feel.
Straightaway cocktails are the best packaged cocktails for people who want smaller servings on hand.
For soccer fans in the Puget Sound
If your soccer friend doesn’t read Sounder at Heart they must. It’s another place I write. There’s a special on annual support right now at 20% off.
Reign tickets are cheaper than Sounders tickets and you’ll be supporting the best women in the world. For the Sounders fans that don’t have tickets get the two-pack. Avoid getting Men’s World Cup tickets at the current pricing unless your budget is quite a bit bigger than mine.
Not from the local area? 1996 Designs makes excellent large brick people of your favorite American soccer teams.
For being prepared without being a Prepper
Working around emergency and crisis managers is reminding me of a few ways to be prepared.
Have a plan when the emergency happens. Know your neighbors and the organizations that will help when disasters happen, because they will happen. A communications system that involves receiving alerts from multiple sources is vital — that should include a radio, as well as your local alerts system and free services on social media. Have backup power, even light solar for portable devices is helpful. You need at least three days of food and water, but if your budget of money and space allows a week or two that’s better.
SHARE AND HELP OTHERS as part of your plan.
- Portable Emergency Weather Alert Crank Radio – ER50
- 65W Power Bank w/ 15W Solar Panel by Grid Doctor
- Costco emergency food kits
- Support active NGOs with a history of success that empower locals — Team Rubicon and World Central Kitchen for example.
I also keep an Amazon list for my family that lives well away. People can also decide to support the website.
None of the above products or services pay me except Sounder at Heart, the website I founded and ran from 2008 to 2019 and rejoined in 2022, Factal (and those linked resources are free to the general public) and the two supplements mentioned in line paid me a one-time commission.
#coffee #dnd #flavor #giftGuide #giftIdeas #reign #renton #sounders #wine
-
CW: Quotes from Doctor Who episodes "The Doctor Falls" And "The Fires Of Pompeii"; continuing to fight when you don't expect to win, or even know you won't; existential thoughts; trans rights and protections rollbacks
In "The Doctor Falls", the Doctor says the following in response to why he's taking a certain course of action:
Winning? Is that what you think it's about? I'm not trying to win. I'm not doing this because I want to beat someone, or because I hate someone, or because, because I want to blame someone. It's not because it's fun and God knows it's not because it's easy. It's not even because it works, because it hardly ever does. I do what I do, because it's right! Because it's decent! And above all, it's kind. It's just that. Just kind. If I run away today, good people will die. If I stand and fight, some of them might live. Maybe not many, maybe not for long. Hey, you know, maybe there's no point in any of this at all, but it's the best I can do, so I'm going to do it. And I will stand here doing it till it kills me.
As a queer, trans person living in a country that considers us a "a huge problem to a sane world" and which is actively rolling back our rights and protections, we very much vibe with this :TransHeart:
For us, this isn't the only reason we continue to battle on in spite of seemingly impossible odds, but it is very much a core reason :PleadingFaceWithRedHearts:
We know we can't save everyone. Heck, sometimes it feels like we're not doing any good whatsoever 😞
And then someone will message us for help and be incredibly grateful, advise that they've changed their Steam login using our guide, or thank us for having helped them previously :FaceHoldingBackTears:
Again, this reminds of a section of dialogue from an earlier Doctor Who episode, "The Fires Of Pompeii".
DONNA: You can't just leave them!
DOCTOR: Don't you think I've done enough? History's back in place and everyone dies.
DONNA: You've got to go back. Doctor, I am telling you, take this thing back. It's not fair.
DOCTOR: No, it's not.
DONNA: But your own planet. It burned.
DOCTOR: That's just it. Don't you see, Donna? Can't you understand? If I could go back and save them, then I would. But I can't. I can never go back. I can't. I just can't, I can't.
DONNA: Just someone. Please. Not the whole town. Just save someone.Sometimes, you've got just to save someone, you know?
Or at least try.
And we are trying...
... often very trying 😅
#DoctorWho #TheDoctorFalls #TheFiresOfPompeii #trans #transgender #TransRights #TransRightsAreHumanRights #TransGenocide #WhyWeFight #queer #LGBTQ+ #LGBTQIA+
-
As part of our 100-year celebrations, we would like to hear stories from you on how The Company of Biologists has impacted your careers.
Send us your message:
-
#BOOMFactCheck | BOOM found the viral message to be misleading. While #AkshayKumar did in fact promote a Home Ministry fund called 'Bharat Ke Veer', we found no reported instance of him promoting the Army Welfare Battle Casualty Fund
-
#BOOMFactCheck | BOOM found the viral message to be misleading. While #AkshayKumar did in fact promote a Home Ministry fund called 'Bharat Ke Veer', we found no reported instance of him promoting the Army Welfare Battle Casualty Fund
-
So this is a mini essay I wrote for my employers, to explain why I refuse to use AI tools at work. They have recently been pushing it and I wanted to make my position crystal clear and attempt to open up discussions. I'm not in a management position so don't have any voice when it comes to decision making. I also struggle to express myself verbally and miss out context.
I initially sent it to my manager on Tuesday. She then had a meeting with her manager and brought it up, and he suggested I send it to him and 2 members of the extended leadership team above him, who are directly below the CEO.
My managers managers response was very positive, he messaged me to say it was very powerful and he wanted to take the weekend to process.
Anyway it's not my best writing but here it is.
Why I refuse to use AI tools such as Co-pilot, ChatGPT, Claude etc.
Written by human hands and mind – Jax Ven****As *** leaders increase their push for employees to use AI tools, I would like to lay out the reasons why I refuse to do so. I feel the need to do this in order to show that I am not acting out of a fear of new technology, but as someone who understands technological progression and has been interested in this field for decades, studying virtual reality and AI at university 15 years ago and following the industry closely since. I also hope that this may convince you to pause and reflect, and commit to allowing every employee to choose for themselves if they wish to use AI tools, without being penalised or left behind should we choose not to.
I have always been very optimistic about what AI could bring us and how it could benefit our lives not just in the workplace, but also at home and for society in general. However, to borrow a phrase used often in online tech circles, ‘this is not the AI we were promised’.
Instead we have AI that is unreliable at best, and risking our lives and our environment at worst.
The environmental impact of data centres is huge. A recent report by the IEA (International Energy Agency) found that data centre energy usage had surged during 2025 and was set to continue.
“According to the report – Key Questions on Energy and AI – power consumption per AI task is declining rapidly, with efficiency improving at a rate unprecedented in energy history. However, more people are using AI, and energy-intensive uses – such as AI agents – are on the rise. As a result, electricity consumption from data centres is set to double by 2030, and power use from those focused on AI is poised to triple.”
The IEA article goes on to speculate that AI may drive the creation and large-scale adoption of greener tech, but we are not there yet and the current state of play is dangerous and damaging to our environment right now, regardless of future potential. Future potential does not cancel out current harm.
I do not wish to contribute to this.
In addition to the environmental impact the creation of new data centres is having a detrimental effect on neighbouring communities with the blatant disregard for them. For example, residents of a town in Michigan voted overwhelmingly to not have a 21 Million square feet data centre built close to their town, with the town commission also voting in favour to reject due to the impact it would have on the local environment, electricity demand and increased traffic. Related Digital (OpenAI, Stargate Initiative) successfully sued the town and are going ahead anyway.
https://fortune.com/2026/05/06/ai-data-center-michigan-saline-politics-farmland/
These data centres are costing billions and billions. The people paying for them are well aware that they have enough money to be able to do whatever the hell they like while making promises of increased opportunities and future green tech. All while they risk destroying the communities surrounding them.
I do not wish to contribute to this.
AI is now being used in war. The same companies that are used to summarise emails or generate a slide deck are being used in cyber defence.
“WASHINGTON — On April 27, the Army convened 14 senior cybersecurity executives from leading technology companies at the Pentagon for the second iteration of its artificial intelligence tabletop exercise, an effort designed to accelerate adoption of agentic AI for cyber defense.
The exercise, known as AI TTX 2.0, brought together C-suite leaders from companies including Amazon Web Services, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks and others alongside Army and Department of War leadership. The Office of the Principal Cyber Advisor hosted the half-day event, with design and moderation support from the Special Competitive Studies Project, and partnering organizations including U.S. Cyber Command, U.S. Army Cyber Command and the Army Cyber Institute at West Point.”
https://www.army.mil/article/292158/army_convenes_industry_leaders_for_ai_tabletop_exercise_focused_on_cyber_defenseI do not wish to contribute to this.
The effect of regular use of AI tools on cognitive function is still being studied but so far the results are extremely concerning. I enjoy using the skills I’ve developed over the last 30 years. I enjoy figuring things out and learning new things. I enjoy putting my thoughts into words with my own voice. These are the things that motivate me.
I thoroughly believe that the more we rely on AI tools, the easier it will become to offload simple tasks to these tools and the temptation to have them do as much of our workload as possible is too great, especially when we are being told to use AI tools to increase our productivity.
“A new MIT study titled, Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task, has found that using ChatGPT to help write essays leads to long-term cognitive harm—measurable through EEG brain scans. Students who repeatedly relied on ChatGPT showed weakened neural connectivity, impaired memory recall, and diminished sense of ownership over their own writing. While the AI-gener”ated content often scored well, the brains behind it were shutting down.
I do not wish to be a victim of this.
Things I am also concerned about but have not written about here in great detail (or this would be 20 pages long) are;
‘Enshittification’ of the internet: can no longer trust search results, or that academic papers, news reports, images, videos and music are not AI created.
Security Risks; apps and software being developed by ‘vibe coding’ are being found to contain serious security flaws that would enable hackers to obtain sensitive customer and company data. Who is checking vibe coders code?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jodiecook/2026/03/20/vibe-coding-has-a-massive-security-problem/
AI is a technology that I would love to be using, and it should be a natural progression of my career. I should relish digging in and getting to know how everything works, being creative and finding new ways to use it. That’s who I am. I would fully embrace it and advocate for it. But not in it’s current format, with it’s current harms, and it’s current masters. The likes of Elon Musk, Sam Altman and Jensen Huang are billionaires who do not live in the same reality as the rest of us, and do not have our best interests at heart. The AI models these people are enabling are not the AI we were promised. For all of the reasons outlined above I cannot in good conscience contribute by becoming a user. This is at the core of my ethics and my beliefs, and it would devastate me to be forced to take part. This may seem dramatic but I am just one of many, many people worldwide who are also refusing to take part and that number is growing day by day. I guess we are ‘conscientious objectors’.
It’s not just about an individuals personal use. One could argue that the amount of energy one person uses or their monetary contribution to AI companies from simple day to day workplace tasks is not great enough to be an issue. However, it is about collective use and about ethical standpoints. Do we, as a company with a mission to help people embrace greener technology, really want to contribute to all of these things? Sometimes the only power we have is to choose where our money goes. It’s something I do as an individual consumer and something that companies can do on a grander scale to take a stand and be on the right side. Yes, I understand the need to increase productivity and remain competitive but we were already on the right track before the push to use AI tools. I also believe it is a mistake to rely on them too much as subscription costs are set to soar and the ‘AI Bubble’ predictions are looking more and more likely. I think it’s far better to pause or greatly limit use, allow employees to decide they don’t wish to use it at all, and see what the state of play is in a year or two. ‘Fear of Missing Out’ is a very real phenomena that I sadly see playing out here.
I guarantee I am not the only one at *** who feels this way, but with the job market as it is right now (thanks to AI) it can be very risky to speak out. I know people in other companies who are being forced to use AI tools or risk losing their jobs and I would like to think that we are better than that at ***, but this still feels risky. However I cannot stay silent any more and need to make my position, and my reasoning for this position crystal clear and hope that everything I have outlined can be given serious thought.
Thank you for reading and I look forward to discussing this in more detail should you wish.
-
📢 Message de Standing-together (Israël) diffusé sur #bluesky le (2025-03-18)
- https://bsky.app/profile/standing-together.bsky.social/post/3lknta7wvms2o
# 1/5
The only way to stop them and their war is for every one of us to refuse. This war is Netanyahu, Smotrich, and Ben Gvir’s war of choice, and it’s time to refuse to take part in it. It’s time to refuse to die in Netanyahu’s war.
# 2/5
It's time to refuse to be complicit in a war that will seal the fate of the hostages. To refuse to kill entire families just because the far-right is addicted to violence and refuses to offer a different path. It’s time to refuse to be soldiers in Netanyahu’s political survival battle.
# 3/5
This government has no mandate from the public and no legitimacy. It is a minority government that the people in Israel want to replace in elections. But they have shown us time and again that they don’t care, they will send people from our society to kill and be killed just to cling to power.
# 4/5
We must not help them. It is our duty to refuse to give them a hand. There was a ceasefire agreement that freed hostages and stopped the war. The government chose to collapse it because they are willing to destroy our future just to hold on to power.
# 5/5
We refuse to kill and be killed in this war. Out of love for this place, the people who live here, and a deep concern for our shared future, we are leading a call that many have already joined: We must refuse to fight for Netanyahu.
###################
# En français
# 1/5
La seule façon d'arrêter cette guerre et ceux qui la mènent, c'est que chacun d'entre nous refuse.
Cette guerre est la guerre de choix de Netanyahou, Smotrich et Ben Gvir, et il est temps de refuser d'y prendre part.
Il est temps de refuser de mourir dans la guerre de Netanyahou.
# 2/5
Il est temps de refuser d'être complice d'une guerre qui scellera le sort des otages.
De refuser de tuer des familles entières simplement parce que l'extrême droite est accro à la violence et refuse de proposer une voie différente.
Il est temps de refuser d'être des soldats dans la bataille politique de survie de Netanyahou.
# 3/5
Ce gouvernement n'a aucun mandat du public et aucune légitimité.
C'est un gouvernement minoritaire que les Israéliens veulent remplacer par des élections.
Mais ils nous ont montré à maintes reprises qu'ils s'en fichent, ils enverront des membres de notre société tuer et se faire tuer juste pour s'accrocher au pouvoir.
# 4/5
Nous ne devons pas les aider.
Il est de notre devoir de refuser de leur donner un coup de main.
Il y avait un accord de cessez-le-feu qui a libéré des otages et arrêté la guerre.
Le gouvernement a choisi de le faire échouer parce qu'il est prêt à détruire notre avenir juste pour s'accrocher au pouvoir.
# 5/5
Nous refusons de tuer et d'être tués dans cette guerre.
Par amour pour cet endroit, pour les gens qui y vivent et par profonde inquiétude pour notre avenir commun, nous lançons un appel auquel beaucoup se sont déjà joints :
Nous devons refuser de nous battre pour Netanyahou.
-
Activists and human rights groups have warned of an escalation in the response to the #Iranian #protests
and say a
#brutal #crackdown is under way as security forces continue to fire directly at protesters.An eyewitness in a message relayed to the Guardian said:
“It’s a battlefield here and they [security forces] are firing mercilessly.”#Ebrahim #Eshaghi, an Iranian wrestler who lives in Germany, but comes from the city of #Lordegan and has been in touch with protesters on the ground, said:
“Today, the people of my city came out into the streets to demand their rights.
“So far, two young people have been killed and many more have been injured.
We ask all the people of the world to be our voice.
The Islamic Republic is the enemy of us all.”Video footage shared on social media appears to show the use of gunfire by #security #forces against protesters as crowds run through smoke-filled streets and apparently injured people being carried away.
On Thursday evening the Tasnim news agency reported that Iranian authorities in Tehran had
🔸arrested 30 people on suspicion of public order offences.“After a coordinated operation by the security and intelligence services, 30 people accused of disturbing public order in the Malard district of western Tehran were identified and arrested last night,” the report said.
https://c.im/@cdarwin/115822714706088189 -
Lazy Caturday Reads: Trump’s War on Iran
Good Day!!
Painting of a cat resting on a pillow next to a Muslim scholar in Cairo, by John Frederick Lewis (1805–1876)
Today I’m featuring Persian cats. It’s not the Iranian people’s fault that Trump is raining down hellfire on their country. According to Wikipedia, cats are the preferred pet in Iran; and Persian cats are the local favorite.
The Persian cat, also known as the Persian Longhair or simply Persian, is a long-haired traditional breed of cat characterised by a round face and petite, but not flat and not smashed in, muzzle. The short flat nose was created in the US from in-breeding and causes breathing difficulties in the breed, whereas, the traditional Persian breed has a petite nose which enables them to breathe without difficulties.
The first documented ancestors of Persian cats might have been imported into Italy from Khorasan as early as around 1620, but this has not been proven. Instead, there is stronger evidence for a longhaired cat breed being exported from Afghanistan and Iran/Persia from the 19th century onwards.[2][3][4] Persian cats have been widely recognised by the North-West European cat fancy since the 19th century,[5] and after World War II by breeders from North America, Australia and New Zealand.[5] Some cat fancier organisations’ breed standards subsume the Himalayan and Exotic Shorthair as variants of this breed, while others generally treat them as separate breeds.
The selective breeding carried out by breeders has allowed the development of a wide variety of coat colours,[5] but has also led to the creation of increasingly flat-faced Persian cats. Favoured by fanciers, this head structure can bring with it several health problems. As is the case with the Siamese breed, there have been efforts by some breeders to preserve the older type of cat, the Traditional Persian, which has a more pronounced muzzle.
Wikipedia on Islamic beliefs about cats:
In Islam, the domestic cat is regarded as ritually clean and thus holds a unique status in comparison to other companion animals, such as the domestic dog. Under Islamic law, cats are permitted to be kept by Muslims within their homes and other private and public spaces, including mosques. Likewise, if a person’s food or drink is sampled by a cat, it is not rendered impure or unfit for consumption, and water from which a cat has drunk is permissible to use for ablution.
Cats are believed by Muslims to possess barakah, which refers to a blessing power that is said to flow through those who are spiritually closest to God.[1][2] As such, they are widely acclaimed as the “quintessential pet” for a Muslim household.
I hope these cats will provide some respite from the horrible news.
Trump is really sounding drunk with power (what else is new?) on his illegal war on Iran. Yesterday, he demanded “unconditional surrender” from the Iranians.
Traditionall Persian cat
CNBC: Trump says no deal with Iran to end war without ‘unconditional surrender.’
President Donald Trump said in a social media post on Friday that there would be no deal to end the U.S. war against Iran without an “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” by Iran.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 900 points, or nearly 2%, after Trump’s demand, which he wrote on Truth Social. The S&P 500and Nasdaq Composite fell 1.6% each, and oil futures prices rose.
Trump said that after a surrender and “the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before.”
“IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. “MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!)” Trump wrote, echoing his “Make America Great” movement’s name.
Trump’s demand came as Iran has yet to pick a leader to replace Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed last weekend in an airstrike at the beginning of the war by the U.S. and Israel.
What the hell does that mean? It’s not even a declared war.
Later, the White House tried to clarify the demand: Trump to Axios: “Unconditional surrender” is when Iran “can’t fight any longer.”
President Trump told Axios Friday that his demand for Iran’s “unconditional surrender” could mean the complete destruction of the regime’s military capabilities — not necessarily a formal surrender.
- “Unconditional surrender could be that [the Iranians] announce it. But it could also be when they can’t fight any longer because they don’t have anyone or anything to fight with,” he said in a phone interview.
Why it matters: Trump’s explanation came hours after he appeared to leave no visible off-ramp for Iran, ruling out any kind of “deal” as he demanded “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” in a post on Truth Social.
— White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later said on Fox News that “unconditional surrender” means Trump determining “that Iran can no longer pose a threat to the U.S. and our troops in the Middle East.”
— Leavitt listed U.S. objectives as destroying Iran’s navy, eliminating its ballistic missile threat, ensuring it cannot obtain a nuclear weapon and weakening its regional proxies.
From The Guardian: Iran rejects Trump’s demand for unconditional surrender as a ‘dream.’
The president of Iran has rejected Donald Trump’s call for the country’s unconditional surrender as a “dream”, while issuing a rare apology for Iranian attacks that hit neighbouring states, even as missiles and drones continued to strike Gulf countries.
Moder type Persian cat
In a prerecorded address broadcast on state television on Saturday, Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, said the country would never capitulate, responding to remarks by the US president, who said on Friday that only Iran’s total submission could bring the war to an end.
Iran’s enemies, Pezeshkian said, “must take their dream of the Iranian people’s unconditional surrender to their graves”, in remarks that further escalate the eighth day of conflict, which has choked global oil supplies and cut world air travel.
During his speech, Pezeshkian also issued an apology to neighbouring states for Iran’s recent “actions”, in an apparent attempt to ease regional anger after Iranian strikes hit civilian targets in Gulf Arab countries.
Tehran has responded to attacks on its territory by targeting Israel, but also Gulf Arab states that host US military installations, while Israel has also launched intense strikes on Lebanon, where the Iran-backed armed group Hezbollah is based.
In response to Iran’s refusal to surrender, Trump issued more threats. Politico: Trump vows to hit ‘very hard’ after Iran’s president says he won’t surrender.
President Donald Trump announced plans to launch yet more strikes against Iran on Saturday, escalating his threats as the conflict with Iran enters its second week.
“Today Iran will be hit very hard!” he wrote on Truth Social Saturday morning. “Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death, because of Iran’s bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment in time.”
Islamic miniature depicting Abu Hudhayfa ibn Utba (right) informing As’ad ibn Zurara that he has converted to Islam, with the presence of a cat denoting his home’s ritual purity.
Trump’s threat came after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian labeled the president’s earlier call for Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” a “dream that they should take to their grave” in a speech broadcast on state television Saturday.
Pezeshkian also said his country would no longer strike its neighbors in the Middle East — so long as attacks against Iran weren’t being launched from those countries. Trump took credit for the new policy, writing on Truth Social that it “was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attack.”
“It is the first time that Iran has ever lost, in thousands of years, to surrounding Middle Eastern Countries,” he said. “They have said, ‘Thank you President Trump.’ I have said, ‘You’re welcome!’ Iran is no longer the ‘Bully of the Middle East,’ they are, instead, ‘THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST,’ and will be for many decades until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse!”
Trump is really full of himself. He even thinks he should help decide who Iran’s next leader will be!
Meanwhile, things here at home aren’t going so well.
Politico: Trump’s week: Poor jobs numbers, high gas prices and Noem’s ouster.
Donald Trump won reelection on the promise of restoring the economy and eliminating illegal immigration.
But in the last week, both issues have threatened to turn into liabilities: A stagnant labor market and soaring gas prices amid the Iran conflict are hammering the economy, and the ouster of Kristi Noem from the Department of Homeland Security has cast new light on the administration’s increasingly unpopular immigration agenda. The economic backdrop has grown ominous — Wall Street analysts are warning that surging oil prices could lead to stagflation — and the blitzkrieg of bad news has jeopardized the GOP’s ability to keep voters focused on Trump administration policies that were designed to help with the rising cost of living.
“If you combine an economy that people don’t like with a prolonged war that you know nobody in his base believes they voted for, that’s a toxic problem,” said one Trump ally granted anonymity to speak freely. While Trump isn’t on the ballot this year, his party needs the president’s poll numbers to improve to keep the House and Senate….
The Iran conflict has put immense upward pressure on oil and gas –- prices at the pump have climbed by more than 11 percent in a week. Now, with employers shedding payroll and Trump pressing reset on who’s leading his immigration agenda, the president is on the backfoot on the two issues he needs to own for his party to win the midterms….
The president, meanwhile, is also struggling with what was once his strongest and most defining issue — immigration. While the number of people crossing the southern border has fallen significantly, in part due to Trump administration efforts, the widely shared images of aggressive enforcement actions across the country have left even some of his supporters wincing. Other conservatives, still, are unhappy that those efforts have not gone far enough, falling short of the “mass deportations” he promised on the campaign trail.
Polling underscores the erosion of support. A recent NBC News poll found that 49 percent of adults strongly disapprove of Trump’s handling of border security and immigration, up from 38 percent last summer. Nearly three-quarters of the poll’s respondents said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement should be reformed or abolished.
Trump’s Thursday dismissal of Noem came after months of increasing frustration inside the White House with how she ran the department.
From Greg Sargent at The New Republic: Donald Trump’s Presidency Is in Free Fall.
Consider three of the biggest developments in our politics right now: We just learned that the economy lost 92,000 jobs in February, a capstone to a terrible year in terms of job creation. President Trump has fired widely despised Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, a key architect of his mass deportations. And reports are indicating that the killing of scores of Iranian schoolchildren might have been the handiwork of the United States.
What links all these things? In addition to the massive human toll they’re inflicting, they suggest that Trump is about to pull off a unique trifecta. He is squandering the advantage he and Republicans have enjoyed in recent years on three major GOP-friendly issues: The economy, immigration, and national security.
Painting by Tatjana Cechun
This isn’t meant as a political gotcha; it has important ideological and policy implications. When Trump took office last year, it was reasonable to fear that the American public would rally behind mass deportations and tariffs—that is, embrace two of the main tenets of right-wing nationalism. Meanwhile, the launch of the largest military attack in the Mideast in decades might have plausibly produced a rally-around-the-war-president effect.
None of that is happening. And that’s significant in not-so-obvious ways.
Let’s start with Trump and national security. According to an extraordinary video analysis by The New York Times, the horrific bombing of an elementary school in southern Iran—which killed 175 people, many children—occurred while the United States was conducting missile strikes in the area aimed at a nearby Iranian naval base.
What’s more, Reuters reports that military investigators now believe U.S. forces likely bombed the school. We should suspend final judgement, of course. But it’s looking very much like this atrocity—one of the worst massacres of civilians in memory—is the result of Trump’s war. Whatever we learn about it, there will inevitably be more such horrors.
Now look at this in the context of remarks from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House adviser Stephen Miller. Hegseth recently declared that the United States is dispensing with “stupid rules of engagement” and will no longer fight “politically correct wars.” Miller recently enthused that Trump’s military doesn’t have “its hands tied behind its back,” mocked the very idea of human rights, and insisted that “strength” and “force” and “power” are fundamentally all that matter in the international arena.
But we’re now learning why we have the sort of constraints on military conduct these men ridicule. “Trump, Miller and Hegseth’s FAFO approach to the use of official government force and violence comes with considerable risk,” Democratic Congressman Adam Smith told me, employing the acronym for “Fuck Around and Find Out.” Atrocities like the school bombing, he added, show the perils that come when we “brazenly dismiss any sort of rules of engagement designed to protect the lives and rights of civilians.”
Just a bit more:
The swaggering certainty of Hegseth and Miller, those two giants of American statecraft, is what’s notable here. As Alan Elrod writes at Liberal Currents, at times like this you can almost smell MAGA’s “bloodlust.” Clearly they have no doubt the public will rally behind this supposed display of Trump’s “strength.” Or maybe they don’t think it matters what the public thinks.
But it does matter. Data analyst G. Elliott Morris averaged high quality polling on Trump’s Iran invasion, and found that only 38 percent of respondents approve—the lowest initial support for an American war perhaps ever. Trump’s overall approval has also dropped a hair since the bombing began—it’s hovering at around 39-58—leading Morris to conclude that no rally-around-the-flag effect is materializing.
Also note that a CNN poll just showed that 59 percent don’t trust Trump to make the right decisions regarding the use of force in Iran, suggesting already-entrenched skepticism of Trump’s commander-in-chief abilities exactly when a “war president” boomlet might be expected to kick in. The school bombing will make this worse. In short, Trump has no built-in national security advantage. If anything he’s viewed as bad on it.
Read the rest at TNR.
Two more stories that show the callous nature of Trump’s war:
HuffPo: U.S. May Have Committed War Crime In Sinking Of Iranian Ship.
The U.S. torpedoing of an Iranian frigate off Sri Lanka this week may have violated the Geneva Conventions by failing to help rescue sailors from the stricken warship, an act that could potentially endanger American service members in this and future wars.
The 312-foot Dena and its 130-member crew, many of them musicians in the Iranian navy band, had just finished participating in an Indian government naval exercise and cultural exchange that the U.S. Navy had also participated in and were on the way home on Wednesday. After clearing Sri Lanka, it was struck by a torpedo fired from a U.S. Navy submarine about 20 miles from the island’s southern tip. The weapon appears to have ruptured the hull from beneath, and the warship quickly sank. The submarine did not attempt to rescue Iranian sailors in the water.
Painting of a calico Persian cat, by Lynn Lachapelle Seguin
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt bragged about how the attack featured the first American use of a torpedo to sink a ship since World War II. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, narrating a video clip of the attack, used the same gloating tone. “An American submarine sunk an Iranian warship that thought it was safe in international waters. Instead, it was sunk by a torpedo. Quiet death,” he intoned.
Hegseth had previously mocked the “stupid rules of engagement” that aim to limit civilian deaths and other actions that could constitute war crimes.
“There is an affirmative duty to rescue under the Geneva Conventions,” said Mark Nevitt, a former Navy lawyer in the judge advocate general corps and now a law professor at Emory University.
He and other legal experts warn that disregarding those and other rules invites mistreatment, even death, to Americans who are shipwrecked or captured.
Yahoo News: Pete Hegseth Mocks ‘Iranians That Think They’re Gonna Live.’
In a preview of an upcoming 60 Minutes interview released on Friday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth mocked “Iranians that think they’re gonna live” while answering a question on reports that Russia provided Iran with intel to target American soldiers in the ongoing conflict.
In the clip, CBS News’ Major Garrett cited three sources “telling us that Russia is providing intelligence to Iran on U.S. positions and movements.”
“The average American might hear that and think that’s a big and dangerous deal,” continued Garrett. “Is it?”
“Well, we’re tracking everything,” responded Hegseth. “We have the best intelligence in the world… President [Donald Trump] has an incredible knack at knowing how to mitigate those risks, and so the American people can rest assured their commander in chief is well aware of who’s talking to who, and anything that shouldn’t be happening — whether it’s in public or backchanneled — is being confronted and confronted strongly.”
“So the American people can therefore expect conversations with the Russians to stop this?” clarified Garrett.
“Well, I,” Hegseth stumbled. “President Trump, as people have seen, has a unique relationship with a lot of world leaders, where he can get things done that other presidents — certainly [former President] Joe Biden —
“Well, I,” Hegseth stumbled. “President Trump, as people have seen, has a unique relationship with a lot of world leaders, where he can get things done that other presidents — certainly [former President] Joe Biden — never could have. And through direct conversations or indirect, through him one-to-one, or through his cabinet, messages definitely can be delivered.”
We’ll see. I have zero faith that Trump will stand up to Putin on anything.
The New York Times on the Russia story: Russia Is Sharing Intelligence With Iran, U.S. Officials Say.
Russia has provided intelligence to Iran during the U.S.-Israeli war, including satellite imagery showing the locations of warships and military personnel, according to U.S. officials.
The information sharing could complicate relations between the United States and Russia, given that President Trump has often taken a more conciliatory stance toward Moscow than his predecessors.
Persian cat by Carolee Vitaletti
But some of the officials played down the partnership, saying Russia has long provided similar intelligence to Iran. And it is not clear how much Tehran has been able to use the new intelligence, if at all. Iran has advanced missiles, but they lag far behind Russia’s and it is not clear Iran could use the intelligence to target a ship.
Furthermore, given the immense pressure of the combined U.S.-Israeli assault, which began last Saturday, Iran’s ability to launch missiles has been degraded, officials said.
But officials confirmed that Russia has provided updated intelligence on the position of U.S. assets since the beginning of the war, information meant to help Iran target the assets.
So far Iranian forces have not hit any U.S. warships, but they have struck at U.S. military bases, killing six service members in Kuwait and damaging facilities in Bahrain. Iranian drones have also struck a building housing the C.I.A. station in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, though no one was injured in that attack, officials said.
I guess we’ll eventually find out how effective Russia’s help is and whether Trump will do anything about it.
Two more stories that address possible outcomes of the Iran “war.”
The Washington Post (gift link): Intel report warns large-scale war ‘unlikely’ to oust Iran’s regime.
A classified report by the National Intelligence Council found that even a large-scale assault on Iran launched by the United States would be unlikely to oust the Islamic republic’s entrenched military and clerical establishment, a sobering assessment as the Trump administration raises the specter of an extended military campaign that officials sayhas “only just begun.”
The findings, confirmed to The Washington Post by three people familiar with the report’s contents, raise doubts about President Donald Trump’s declared plan to “clean out” Iran’s leadership structure and install a ruler of his choosing.
The report, completed about a week before the United States and Israel initiated the war on Feb. 28, outlined succession scenarios stemming from either a narrowly tailored campaign against Iran’s leaders or a broader assault against its leadership and government institutions, the people familiar with its findings said. In both cases, the intelligence concluded that Iran’s clerical and military establishment would respond to the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by following protocols designed to preserve continuity of power, these people said.
The prospect of Iran’s fragmented opposition taking control of the country was described as “unlikely,” said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a classified report.
On the other hand, maybe this is all just a distraction from the Epstein files. Read more with the gift link.
Peter Baker at The New York Times (gift link): Wars Often Lose Public Support Over Time. Trump Started This One Without Much.
President Trump likes to assert that he has accomplished things no other president has. With the opening of his military assault against Iran, he has achieved another distinction: He is the first president in the era of modern polling to take the United States to war without the support of the public.
Traditionally, Americans stand behind their president when he first orders troops into battle, generally sticking with him unless it drags on, casualties mount and victory seems increasingly elusive. With Mr. Trump’s war against Iran, the public has skipped the rally-around-the-president phase this time.
Support for his ferocious bombardment of Iran has ranged from 27 percent in a Reuters/Ipsos poll to 41 percent in a CNN survey, far below the level of public backing that Mr. Trump’s predecessors initially enjoyed when they used force overseas. Given that wars tend to grow less popular over time, the initial negative response portends political challenges for Mr. Trump and his fellow Republicans the longer the fighting continues.
The opposition is revealing about this particular moment in American history. A country already tired of decades of combat in the Middle East has shown little appetite for yet another adventure abroad. And the deep polarization of American politics only makes it harder to build support across lines. Even some Americans sympathetic to the goal of toppling the repressive, terrorist-sponsoring government in Tehran find it difficult to embrace Mr. Trump as commander in chief.
Moreover, unlike his predecessors, Mr. Trump has not done much to bring the public along, forgoing the usual tools of his office to explain to Americans what he is doing, why he is doing it and how it will end. Instead, he and his administration have offered contradictory accounts of what drove this decision and what victory would look like.
“As he has in many other areas, President Trump is pioneering a new approach,” said Peter D. Feaver, a national security aide under President George W. Bush during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “He has enjoyed considerable success in doing other things that previous presidents thought couldn’t or shouldn’t be done, but this is one of the biggest political gambles he has taken.”
The consequences are enormous for Mr. Trump’s presidency, for the success of the war and for the upcoming midterm elections, with Republicans already facing ominous signs that they could lose one if not both houses of Congress. The war power votes in the Senate and the House this week, in which Republicans backed Mr. Trump, may be featured in Democratic campaign ads this fall.
Use the gift link to read the rest.
Those are my recommended reads for today. What do you think? What else is on your mind?
#catArt #caturday #DonaldTrump #PersianCats #PeteHegseth #TrumpSWarInIran #USEconomy #viewsOfCatsInIran
-
Lazy Caturday Reads: Trump’s War on Iran
Good Day!!
Painting of a cat resting on a pillow next to a Muslim scholar in Cairo, by John Frederick Lewis (1805–1876)
Today I’m featuring Persian cats. It’s not the Iranian people’s fault that Trump is raining down hellfire on their country. According to Wikipedia, cats are the preferred pet in Iran; and Persian cats are the local favorite.
The Persian cat, also known as the Persian Longhair or simply Persian, is a long-haired traditional breed of cat characterised by a round face and petite, but not flat and not smashed in, muzzle. The short flat nose was created in the US from in-breeding and causes breathing difficulties in the breed, whereas, the traditional Persian breed has a petite nose which enables them to breathe without difficulties.
The first documented ancestors of Persian cats might have been imported into Italy from Khorasan as early as around 1620, but this has not been proven. Instead, there is stronger evidence for a longhaired cat breed being exported from Afghanistan and Iran/Persia from the 19th century onwards.[2][3][4] Persian cats have been widely recognised by the North-West European cat fancy since the 19th century,[5] and after World War II by breeders from North America, Australia and New Zealand.[5] Some cat fancier organisations’ breed standards subsume the Himalayan and Exotic Shorthair as variants of this breed, while others generally treat them as separate breeds.
The selective breeding carried out by breeders has allowed the development of a wide variety of coat colours,[5] but has also led to the creation of increasingly flat-faced Persian cats. Favoured by fanciers, this head structure can bring with it several health problems. As is the case with the Siamese breed, there have been efforts by some breeders to preserve the older type of cat, the Traditional Persian, which has a more pronounced muzzle.
Wikipedia on Islamic beliefs about cats:
In Islam, the domestic cat is regarded as ritually clean and thus holds a unique status in comparison to other companion animals, such as the domestic dog. Under Islamic law, cats are permitted to be kept by Muslims within their homes and other private and public spaces, including mosques. Likewise, if a person’s food or drink is sampled by a cat, it is not rendered impure or unfit for consumption, and water from which a cat has drunk is permissible to use for ablution.
Cats are believed by Muslims to possess barakah, which refers to a blessing power that is said to flow through those who are spiritually closest to God.[1][2] As such, they are widely acclaimed as the “quintessential pet” for a Muslim household.
I hope these cats will provide some respite from the horrible news.
Trump is really sounding drunk with power (what else is new?) on his illegal war on Iran. Yesterday, he demanded “unconditional surrender” from the Iranians.
Traditionall Persian cat
CNBC: Trump says no deal with Iran to end war without ‘unconditional surrender.’
President Donald Trump said in a social media post on Friday that there would be no deal to end the U.S. war against Iran without an “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” by Iran.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 900 points, or nearly 2%, after Trump’s demand, which he wrote on Truth Social. The S&P 500and Nasdaq Composite fell 1.6% each, and oil futures prices rose.
Trump said that after a surrender and “the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before.”
“IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. “MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!)” Trump wrote, echoing his “Make America Great” movement’s name.
Trump’s demand came as Iran has yet to pick a leader to replace Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed last weekend in an airstrike at the beginning of the war by the U.S. and Israel.
What the hell does that mean? It’s not even a declared war.
Later, the White House tried to clarify the demand: Trump to Axios: “Unconditional surrender” is when Iran “can’t fight any longer.”
President Trump told Axios Friday that his demand for Iran’s “unconditional surrender” could mean the complete destruction of the regime’s military capabilities — not necessarily a formal surrender.
- “Unconditional surrender could be that [the Iranians] announce it. But it could also be when they can’t fight any longer because they don’t have anyone or anything to fight with,” he said in a phone interview.
Why it matters: Trump’s explanation came hours after he appeared to leave no visible off-ramp for Iran, ruling out any kind of “deal” as he demanded “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” in a post on Truth Social.
— White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later said on Fox News that “unconditional surrender” means Trump determining “that Iran can no longer pose a threat to the U.S. and our troops in the Middle East.”
— Leavitt listed U.S. objectives as destroying Iran’s navy, eliminating its ballistic missile threat, ensuring it cannot obtain a nuclear weapon and weakening its regional proxies.
From The Guardian: Iran rejects Trump’s demand for unconditional surrender as a ‘dream.’
The president of Iran has rejected Donald Trump’s call for the country’s unconditional surrender as a “dream”, while issuing a rare apology for Iranian attacks that hit neighbouring states, even as missiles and drones continued to strike Gulf countries.
Moder type Persian cat
In a prerecorded address broadcast on state television on Saturday, Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, said the country would never capitulate, responding to remarks by the US president, who said on Friday that only Iran’s total submission could bring the war to an end.
Iran’s enemies, Pezeshkian said, “must take their dream of the Iranian people’s unconditional surrender to their graves”, in remarks that further escalate the eighth day of conflict, which has choked global oil supplies and cut world air travel.
During his speech, Pezeshkian also issued an apology to neighbouring states for Iran’s recent “actions”, in an apparent attempt to ease regional anger after Iranian strikes hit civilian targets in Gulf Arab countries.
Tehran has responded to attacks on its territory by targeting Israel, but also Gulf Arab states that host US military installations, while Israel has also launched intense strikes on Lebanon, where the Iran-backed armed group Hezbollah is based.
In response to Iran’s refusal to surrender, Trump issued more threats. Politico: Trump vows to hit ‘very hard’ after Iran’s president says he won’t surrender.
President Donald Trump announced plans to launch yet more strikes against Iran on Saturday, escalating his threats as the conflict with Iran enters its second week.
“Today Iran will be hit very hard!” he wrote on Truth Social Saturday morning. “Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death, because of Iran’s bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment in time.”
Islamic miniature depicting Abu Hudhayfa ibn Utba (right) informing As’ad ibn Zurara that he has converted to Islam, with the presence of a cat denoting his home’s ritual purity.
Trump’s threat came after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian labeled the president’s earlier call for Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” a “dream that they should take to their grave” in a speech broadcast on state television Saturday.
Pezeshkian also said his country would no longer strike its neighbors in the Middle East — so long as attacks against Iran weren’t being launched from those countries. Trump took credit for the new policy, writing on Truth Social that it “was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attack.”
“It is the first time that Iran has ever lost, in thousands of years, to surrounding Middle Eastern Countries,” he said. “They have said, ‘Thank you President Trump.’ I have said, ‘You’re welcome!’ Iran is no longer the ‘Bully of the Middle East,’ they are, instead, ‘THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST,’ and will be for many decades until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse!”
Trump is really full of himself. He even thinks he should help decide who Iran’s next leader will be!
Meanwhile, things here at home aren’t going so well.
Politico: Trump’s week: Poor jobs numbers, high gas prices and Noem’s ouster.
Donald Trump won reelection on the promise of restoring the economy and eliminating illegal immigration.
But in the last week, both issues have threatened to turn into liabilities: A stagnant labor market and soaring gas prices amid the Iran conflict are hammering the economy, and the ouster of Kristi Noem from the Department of Homeland Security has cast new light on the administration’s increasingly unpopular immigration agenda. The economic backdrop has grown ominous — Wall Street analysts are warning that surging oil prices could lead to stagflation — and the blitzkrieg of bad news has jeopardized the GOP’s ability to keep voters focused on Trump administration policies that were designed to help with the rising cost of living.
“If you combine an economy that people don’t like with a prolonged war that you know nobody in his base believes they voted for, that’s a toxic problem,” said one Trump ally granted anonymity to speak freely. While Trump isn’t on the ballot this year, his party needs the president’s poll numbers to improve to keep the House and Senate….
The Iran conflict has put immense upward pressure on oil and gas –- prices at the pump have climbed by more than 11 percent in a week. Now, with employers shedding payroll and Trump pressing reset on who’s leading his immigration agenda, the president is on the backfoot on the two issues he needs to own for his party to win the midterms….
The president, meanwhile, is also struggling with what was once his strongest and most defining issue — immigration. While the number of people crossing the southern border has fallen significantly, in part due to Trump administration efforts, the widely shared images of aggressive enforcement actions across the country have left even some of his supporters wincing. Other conservatives, still, are unhappy that those efforts have not gone far enough, falling short of the “mass deportations” he promised on the campaign trail.
Polling underscores the erosion of support. A recent NBC News poll found that 49 percent of adults strongly disapprove of Trump’s handling of border security and immigration, up from 38 percent last summer. Nearly three-quarters of the poll’s respondents said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement should be reformed or abolished.
Trump’s Thursday dismissal of Noem came after months of increasing frustration inside the White House with how she ran the department.
From Greg Sargent at The New Republic: Donald Trump’s Presidency Is in Free Fall.
Consider three of the biggest developments in our politics right now: We just learned that the economy lost 92,000 jobs in February, a capstone to a terrible year in terms of job creation. President Trump has fired widely despised Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, a key architect of his mass deportations. And reports are indicating that the killing of scores of Iranian schoolchildren might have been the handiwork of the United States.
What links all these things? In addition to the massive human toll they’re inflicting, they suggest that Trump is about to pull off a unique trifecta. He is squandering the advantage he and Republicans have enjoyed in recent years on three major GOP-friendly issues: The economy, immigration, and national security.
Painting by Tatjana Cechun
This isn’t meant as a political gotcha; it has important ideological and policy implications. When Trump took office last year, it was reasonable to fear that the American public would rally behind mass deportations and tariffs—that is, embrace two of the main tenets of right-wing nationalism. Meanwhile, the launch of the largest military attack in the Mideast in decades might have plausibly produced a rally-around-the-war-president effect.
None of that is happening. And that’s significant in not-so-obvious ways.
Let’s start with Trump and national security. According to an extraordinary video analysis by The New York Times, the horrific bombing of an elementary school in southern Iran—which killed 175 people, many children—occurred while the United States was conducting missile strikes in the area aimed at a nearby Iranian naval base.
What’s more, Reuters reports that military investigators now believe U.S. forces likely bombed the school. We should suspend final judgement, of course. But it’s looking very much like this atrocity—one of the worst massacres of civilians in memory—is the result of Trump’s war. Whatever we learn about it, there will inevitably be more such horrors.
Now look at this in the context of remarks from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House adviser Stephen Miller. Hegseth recently declared that the United States is dispensing with “stupid rules of engagement” and will no longer fight “politically correct wars.” Miller recently enthused that Trump’s military doesn’t have “its hands tied behind its back,” mocked the very idea of human rights, and insisted that “strength” and “force” and “power” are fundamentally all that matter in the international arena.
But we’re now learning why we have the sort of constraints on military conduct these men ridicule. “Trump, Miller and Hegseth’s FAFO approach to the use of official government force and violence comes with considerable risk,” Democratic Congressman Adam Smith told me, employing the acronym for “Fuck Around and Find Out.” Atrocities like the school bombing, he added, show the perils that come when we “brazenly dismiss any sort of rules of engagement designed to protect the lives and rights of civilians.”
Just a bit more:
The swaggering certainty of Hegseth and Miller, those two giants of American statecraft, is what’s notable here. As Alan Elrod writes at Liberal Currents, at times like this you can almost smell MAGA’s “bloodlust.” Clearly they have no doubt the public will rally behind this supposed display of Trump’s “strength.” Or maybe they don’t think it matters what the public thinks.
But it does matter. Data analyst G. Elliott Morris averaged high quality polling on Trump’s Iran invasion, and found that only 38 percent of respondents approve—the lowest initial support for an American war perhaps ever. Trump’s overall approval has also dropped a hair since the bombing began—it’s hovering at around 39-58—leading Morris to conclude that no rally-around-the-flag effect is materializing.
Also note that a CNN poll just showed that 59 percent don’t trust Trump to make the right decisions regarding the use of force in Iran, suggesting already-entrenched skepticism of Trump’s commander-in-chief abilities exactly when a “war president” boomlet might be expected to kick in. The school bombing will make this worse. In short, Trump has no built-in national security advantage. If anything he’s viewed as bad on it.
Read the rest at TNR.
Two more stories that show the callous nature of Trump’s war:
HuffPo: U.S. May Have Committed War Crime In Sinking Of Iranian Ship.
The U.S. torpedoing of an Iranian frigate off Sri Lanka this week may have violated the Geneva Conventions by failing to help rescue sailors from the stricken warship, an act that could potentially endanger American service members in this and future wars.
The 312-foot Dena and its 130-member crew, many of them musicians in the Iranian navy band, had just finished participating in an Indian government naval exercise and cultural exchange that the U.S. Navy had also participated in and were on the way home on Wednesday. After clearing Sri Lanka, it was struck by a torpedo fired from a U.S. Navy submarine about 20 miles from the island’s southern tip. The weapon appears to have ruptured the hull from beneath, and the warship quickly sank. The submarine did not attempt to rescue Iranian sailors in the water.
Painting of a calico Persian cat, by Lynn Lachapelle Seguin
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt bragged about how the attack featured the first American use of a torpedo to sink a ship since World War II. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, narrating a video clip of the attack, used the same gloating tone. “An American submarine sunk an Iranian warship that thought it was safe in international waters. Instead, it was sunk by a torpedo. Quiet death,” he intoned.
Hegseth had previously mocked the “stupid rules of engagement” that aim to limit civilian deaths and other actions that could constitute war crimes.
“There is an affirmative duty to rescue under the Geneva Conventions,” said Mark Nevitt, a former Navy lawyer in the judge advocate general corps and now a law professor at Emory University.
He and other legal experts warn that disregarding those and other rules invites mistreatment, even death, to Americans who are shipwrecked or captured.
Yahoo News: Pete Hegseth Mocks ‘Iranians That Think They’re Gonna Live.’
In a preview of an upcoming 60 Minutes interview released on Friday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth mocked “Iranians that think they’re gonna live” while answering a question on reports that Russia provided Iran with intel to target American soldiers in the ongoing conflict.
In the clip, CBS News’ Major Garrett cited three sources “telling us that Russia is providing intelligence to Iran on U.S. positions and movements.”
“The average American might hear that and think that’s a big and dangerous deal,” continued Garrett. “Is it?”
“Well, we’re tracking everything,” responded Hegseth. “We have the best intelligence in the world… President [Donald Trump] has an incredible knack at knowing how to mitigate those risks, and so the American people can rest assured their commander in chief is well aware of who’s talking to who, and anything that shouldn’t be happening — whether it’s in public or backchanneled — is being confronted and confronted strongly.”
“So the American people can therefore expect conversations with the Russians to stop this?” clarified Garrett.
“Well, I,” Hegseth stumbled. “President Trump, as people have seen, has a unique relationship with a lot of world leaders, where he can get things done that other presidents — certainly [former President] Joe Biden —
“Well, I,” Hegseth stumbled. “President Trump, as people have seen, has a unique relationship with a lot of world leaders, where he can get things done that other presidents — certainly [former President] Joe Biden — never could have. And through direct conversations or indirect, through him one-to-one, or through his cabinet, messages definitely can be delivered.”
We’ll see. I have zero faith that Trump will stand up to Putin on anything.
The New York Times on the Russia story: Russia Is Sharing Intelligence With Iran, U.S. Officials Say.
Russia has provided intelligence to Iran during the U.S.-Israeli war, including satellite imagery showing the locations of warships and military personnel, according to U.S. officials.
The information sharing could complicate relations between the United States and Russia, given that President Trump has often taken a more conciliatory stance toward Moscow than his predecessors.
Persian cat by Carolee Vitaletti
But some of the officials played down the partnership, saying Russia has long provided similar intelligence to Iran. And it is not clear how much Tehran has been able to use the new intelligence, if at all. Iran has advanced missiles, but they lag far behind Russia’s and it is not clear Iran could use the intelligence to target a ship.
Furthermore, given the immense pressure of the combined U.S.-Israeli assault, which began last Saturday, Iran’s ability to launch missiles has been degraded, officials said.
But officials confirmed that Russia has provided updated intelligence on the position of U.S. assets since the beginning of the war, information meant to help Iran target the assets.
So far Iranian forces have not hit any U.S. warships, but they have struck at U.S. military bases, killing six service members in Kuwait and damaging facilities in Bahrain. Iranian drones have also struck a building housing the C.I.A. station in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, though no one was injured in that attack, officials said.
I guess we’ll eventually find out how effective Russia’s help is and whether Trump will do anything about it.
Two more stories that address possible outcomes of the Iran “war.”
The Washington Post (gift link): Intel report warns large-scale war ‘unlikely’ to oust Iran’s regime.
A classified report by the National Intelligence Council found that even a large-scale assault on Iran launched by the United States would be unlikely to oust the Islamic republic’s entrenched military and clerical establishment, a sobering assessment as the Trump administration raises the specter of an extended military campaign that officials sayhas “only just begun.”
The findings, confirmed to The Washington Post by three people familiar with the report’s contents, raise doubts about President Donald Trump’s declared plan to “clean out” Iran’s leadership structure and install a ruler of his choosing.
The report, completed about a week before the United States and Israel initiated the war on Feb. 28, outlined succession scenarios stemming from either a narrowly tailored campaign against Iran’s leaders or a broader assault against its leadership and government institutions, the people familiar with its findings said. In both cases, the intelligence concluded that Iran’s clerical and military establishment would respond to the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by following protocols designed to preserve continuity of power, these people said.
The prospect of Iran’s fragmented opposition taking control of the country was described as “unlikely,” said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a classified report.
On the other hand, maybe this is all just a distraction from the Epstein files. Read more with the gift link.
Peter Baker at The New York Times (gift link): Wars Often Lose Public Support Over Time. Trump Started This One Without Much.
President Trump likes to assert that he has accomplished things no other president has. With the opening of his military assault against Iran, he has achieved another distinction: He is the first president in the era of modern polling to take the United States to war without the support of the public.
Traditionally, Americans stand behind their president when he first orders troops into battle, generally sticking with him unless it drags on, casualties mount and victory seems increasingly elusive. With Mr. Trump’s war against Iran, the public has skipped the rally-around-the-president phase this time.
Support for his ferocious bombardment of Iran has ranged from 27 percent in a Reuters/Ipsos poll to 41 percent in a CNN survey, far below the level of public backing that Mr. Trump’s predecessors initially enjoyed when they used force overseas. Given that wars tend to grow less popular over time, the initial negative response portends political challenges for Mr. Trump and his fellow Republicans the longer the fighting continues.
The opposition is revealing about this particular moment in American history. A country already tired of decades of combat in the Middle East has shown little appetite for yet another adventure abroad. And the deep polarization of American politics only makes it harder to build support across lines. Even some Americans sympathetic to the goal of toppling the repressive, terrorist-sponsoring government in Tehran find it difficult to embrace Mr. Trump as commander in chief.
Moreover, unlike his predecessors, Mr. Trump has not done much to bring the public along, forgoing the usual tools of his office to explain to Americans what he is doing, why he is doing it and how it will end. Instead, he and his administration have offered contradictory accounts of what drove this decision and what victory would look like.
“As he has in many other areas, President Trump is pioneering a new approach,” said Peter D. Feaver, a national security aide under President George W. Bush during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “He has enjoyed considerable success in doing other things that previous presidents thought couldn’t or shouldn’t be done, but this is one of the biggest political gambles he has taken.”
The consequences are enormous for Mr. Trump’s presidency, for the success of the war and for the upcoming midterm elections, with Republicans already facing ominous signs that they could lose one if not both houses of Congress. The war power votes in the Senate and the House this week, in which Republicans backed Mr. Trump, may be featured in Democratic campaign ads this fall.
Use the gift link to read the rest.
Those are my recommended reads for today. What do you think? What else is on your mind?
#catArt #caturday #DonaldTrump #PersianCats #PeteHegseth #TrumpSWarInIran #USEconomy #viewsOfCatsInIran
-
Lazy Caturday Reads: Trump’s War on Iran
Good Day!!
Painting of a cat resting on a pillow next to a Muslim scholar in Cairo, by John Frederick Lewis (1805–1876)
Today I’m featuring Persian cats. It’s not the Iranian people’s fault that Trump is raining down hellfire on their country. According to Wikipedia, cats are the preferred pet in Iran; and Persian cats are the local favorite.
The Persian cat, also known as the Persian Longhair or simply Persian, is a long-haired traditional breed of cat characterised by a round face and petite, but not flat and not smashed in, muzzle. The short flat nose was created in the US from in-breeding and causes breathing difficulties in the breed, whereas, the traditional Persian breed has a petite nose which enables them to breathe without difficulties.
The first documented ancestors of Persian cats might have been imported into Italy from Khorasan as early as around 1620, but this has not been proven. Instead, there is stronger evidence for a longhaired cat breed being exported from Afghanistan and Iran/Persia from the 19th century onwards.[2][3][4] Persian cats have been widely recognised by the North-West European cat fancy since the 19th century,[5] and after World War II by breeders from North America, Australia and New Zealand.[5] Some cat fancier organisations’ breed standards subsume the Himalayan and Exotic Shorthair as variants of this breed, while others generally treat them as separate breeds.
The selective breeding carried out by breeders has allowed the development of a wide variety of coat colours,[5] but has also led to the creation of increasingly flat-faced Persian cats. Favoured by fanciers, this head structure can bring with it several health problems. As is the case with the Siamese breed, there have been efforts by some breeders to preserve the older type of cat, the Traditional Persian, which has a more pronounced muzzle.
Wikipedia on Islamic beliefs about cats:
In Islam, the domestic cat is regarded as ritually clean and thus holds a unique status in comparison to other companion animals, such as the domestic dog. Under Islamic law, cats are permitted to be kept by Muslims within their homes and other private and public spaces, including mosques. Likewise, if a person’s food or drink is sampled by a cat, it is not rendered impure or unfit for consumption, and water from which a cat has drunk is permissible to use for ablution.
Cats are believed by Muslims to possess barakah, which refers to a blessing power that is said to flow through those who are spiritually closest to God.[1][2] As such, they are widely acclaimed as the “quintessential pet” for a Muslim household.
I hope these cats will provide some respite from the horrible news.
Trump is really sounding drunk with power (what else is new?) on his illegal war on Iran. Yesterday, he demanded “unconditional surrender” from the Iranians.
Traditionall Persian cat
CNBC: Trump says no deal with Iran to end war without ‘unconditional surrender.’
President Donald Trump said in a social media post on Friday that there would be no deal to end the U.S. war against Iran without an “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” by Iran.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 900 points, or nearly 2%, after Trump’s demand, which he wrote on Truth Social. The S&P 500and Nasdaq Composite fell 1.6% each, and oil futures prices rose.
Trump said that after a surrender and “the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before.”
“IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. “MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!)” Trump wrote, echoing his “Make America Great” movement’s name.
Trump’s demand came as Iran has yet to pick a leader to replace Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed last weekend in an airstrike at the beginning of the war by the U.S. and Israel.
What the hell does that mean? It’s not even a declared war.
Later, the White House tried to clarify the demand: Trump to Axios: “Unconditional surrender” is when Iran “can’t fight any longer.”
President Trump told Axios Friday that his demand for Iran’s “unconditional surrender” could mean the complete destruction of the regime’s military capabilities — not necessarily a formal surrender.
- “Unconditional surrender could be that [the Iranians] announce it. But it could also be when they can’t fight any longer because they don’t have anyone or anything to fight with,” he said in a phone interview.
Why it matters: Trump’s explanation came hours after he appeared to leave no visible off-ramp for Iran, ruling out any kind of “deal” as he demanded “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” in a post on Truth Social.
— White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later said on Fox News that “unconditional surrender” means Trump determining “that Iran can no longer pose a threat to the U.S. and our troops in the Middle East.”
— Leavitt listed U.S. objectives as destroying Iran’s navy, eliminating its ballistic missile threat, ensuring it cannot obtain a nuclear weapon and weakening its regional proxies.
From The Guardian: Iran rejects Trump’s demand for unconditional surrender as a ‘dream.’
The president of Iran has rejected Donald Trump’s call for the country’s unconditional surrender as a “dream”, while issuing a rare apology for Iranian attacks that hit neighbouring states, even as missiles and drones continued to strike Gulf countries.
Moder type Persian cat
In a prerecorded address broadcast on state television on Saturday, Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, said the country would never capitulate, responding to remarks by the US president, who said on Friday that only Iran’s total submission could bring the war to an end.
Iran’s enemies, Pezeshkian said, “must take their dream of the Iranian people’s unconditional surrender to their graves”, in remarks that further escalate the eighth day of conflict, which has choked global oil supplies and cut world air travel.
During his speech, Pezeshkian also issued an apology to neighbouring states for Iran’s recent “actions”, in an apparent attempt to ease regional anger after Iranian strikes hit civilian targets in Gulf Arab countries.
Tehran has responded to attacks on its territory by targeting Israel, but also Gulf Arab states that host US military installations, while Israel has also launched intense strikes on Lebanon, where the Iran-backed armed group Hezbollah is based.
In response to Iran’s refusal to surrender, Trump issued more threats. Politico: Trump vows to hit ‘very hard’ after Iran’s president says he won’t surrender.
President Donald Trump announced plans to launch yet more strikes against Iran on Saturday, escalating his threats as the conflict with Iran enters its second week.
“Today Iran will be hit very hard!” he wrote on Truth Social Saturday morning. “Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death, because of Iran’s bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment in time.”
Islamic miniature depicting Abu Hudhayfa ibn Utba (right) informing As’ad ibn Zurara that he has converted to Islam, with the presence of a cat denoting his home’s ritual purity.
Trump’s threat came after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian labeled the president’s earlier call for Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” a “dream that they should take to their grave” in a speech broadcast on state television Saturday.
Pezeshkian also said his country would no longer strike its neighbors in the Middle East — so long as attacks against Iran weren’t being launched from those countries. Trump took credit for the new policy, writing on Truth Social that it “was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attack.”
“It is the first time that Iran has ever lost, in thousands of years, to surrounding Middle Eastern Countries,” he said. “They have said, ‘Thank you President Trump.’ I have said, ‘You’re welcome!’ Iran is no longer the ‘Bully of the Middle East,’ they are, instead, ‘THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST,’ and will be for many decades until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse!”
Trump is really full of himself. He even thinks he should help decide who Iran’s next leader will be!
Meanwhile, things here at home aren’t going so well.
Politico: Trump’s week: Poor jobs numbers, high gas prices and Noem’s ouster.
Donald Trump won reelection on the promise of restoring the economy and eliminating illegal immigration.
But in the last week, both issues have threatened to turn into liabilities: A stagnant labor market and soaring gas prices amid the Iran conflict are hammering the economy, and the ouster of Kristi Noem from the Department of Homeland Security has cast new light on the administration’s increasingly unpopular immigration agenda. The economic backdrop has grown ominous — Wall Street analysts are warning that surging oil prices could lead to stagflation — and the blitzkrieg of bad news has jeopardized the GOP’s ability to keep voters focused on Trump administration policies that were designed to help with the rising cost of living.
“If you combine an economy that people don’t like with a prolonged war that you know nobody in his base believes they voted for, that’s a toxic problem,” said one Trump ally granted anonymity to speak freely. While Trump isn’t on the ballot this year, his party needs the president’s poll numbers to improve to keep the House and Senate….
The Iran conflict has put immense upward pressure on oil and gas –- prices at the pump have climbed by more than 11 percent in a week. Now, with employers shedding payroll and Trump pressing reset on who’s leading his immigration agenda, the president is on the backfoot on the two issues he needs to own for his party to win the midterms….
The president, meanwhile, is also struggling with what was once his strongest and most defining issue — immigration. While the number of people crossing the southern border has fallen significantly, in part due to Trump administration efforts, the widely shared images of aggressive enforcement actions across the country have left even some of his supporters wincing. Other conservatives, still, are unhappy that those efforts have not gone far enough, falling short of the “mass deportations” he promised on the campaign trail.
Polling underscores the erosion of support. A recent NBC News poll found that 49 percent of adults strongly disapprove of Trump’s handling of border security and immigration, up from 38 percent last summer. Nearly three-quarters of the poll’s respondents said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement should be reformed or abolished.
Trump’s Thursday dismissal of Noem came after months of increasing frustration inside the White House with how she ran the department.
From Greg Sargent at The New Republic: Donald Trump’s Presidency Is in Free Fall.
Consider three of the biggest developments in our politics right now: We just learned that the economy lost 92,000 jobs in February, a capstone to a terrible year in terms of job creation. President Trump has fired widely despised Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, a key architect of his mass deportations. And reports are indicating that the killing of scores of Iranian schoolchildren might have been the handiwork of the United States.
What links all these things? In addition to the massive human toll they’re inflicting, they suggest that Trump is about to pull off a unique trifecta. He is squandering the advantage he and Republicans have enjoyed in recent years on three major GOP-friendly issues: The economy, immigration, and national security.
Painting by Tatjana Cechun
This isn’t meant as a political gotcha; it has important ideological and policy implications. When Trump took office last year, it was reasonable to fear that the American public would rally behind mass deportations and tariffs—that is, embrace two of the main tenets of right-wing nationalism. Meanwhile, the launch of the largest military attack in the Mideast in decades might have plausibly produced a rally-around-the-war-president effect.
None of that is happening. And that’s significant in not-so-obvious ways.
Let’s start with Trump and national security. According to an extraordinary video analysis by The New York Times, the horrific bombing of an elementary school in southern Iran—which killed 175 people, many children—occurred while the United States was conducting missile strikes in the area aimed at a nearby Iranian naval base.
What’s more, Reuters reports that military investigators now believe U.S. forces likely bombed the school. We should suspend final judgement, of course. But it’s looking very much like this atrocity—one of the worst massacres of civilians in memory—is the result of Trump’s war. Whatever we learn about it, there will inevitably be more such horrors.
Now look at this in the context of remarks from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House adviser Stephen Miller. Hegseth recently declared that the United States is dispensing with “stupid rules of engagement” and will no longer fight “politically correct wars.” Miller recently enthused that Trump’s military doesn’t have “its hands tied behind its back,” mocked the very idea of human rights, and insisted that “strength” and “force” and “power” are fundamentally all that matter in the international arena.
But we’re now learning why we have the sort of constraints on military conduct these men ridicule. “Trump, Miller and Hegseth’s FAFO approach to the use of official government force and violence comes with considerable risk,” Democratic Congressman Adam Smith told me, employing the acronym for “Fuck Around and Find Out.” Atrocities like the school bombing, he added, show the perils that come when we “brazenly dismiss any sort of rules of engagement designed to protect the lives and rights of civilians.”
Just a bit more:
The swaggering certainty of Hegseth and Miller, those two giants of American statecraft, is what’s notable here. As Alan Elrod writes at Liberal Currents, at times like this you can almost smell MAGA’s “bloodlust.” Clearly they have no doubt the public will rally behind this supposed display of Trump’s “strength.” Or maybe they don’t think it matters what the public thinks.
But it does matter. Data analyst G. Elliott Morris averaged high quality polling on Trump’s Iran invasion, and found that only 38 percent of respondents approve—the lowest initial support for an American war perhaps ever. Trump’s overall approval has also dropped a hair since the bombing began—it’s hovering at around 39-58—leading Morris to conclude that no rally-around-the-flag effect is materializing.
Also note that a CNN poll just showed that 59 percent don’t trust Trump to make the right decisions regarding the use of force in Iran, suggesting already-entrenched skepticism of Trump’s commander-in-chief abilities exactly when a “war president” boomlet might be expected to kick in. The school bombing will make this worse. In short, Trump has no built-in national security advantage. If anything he’s viewed as bad on it.
Read the rest at TNR.
Two more stories that show the callous nature of Trump’s war:
HuffPo: U.S. May Have Committed War Crime In Sinking Of Iranian Ship.
The U.S. torpedoing of an Iranian frigate off Sri Lanka this week may have violated the Geneva Conventions by failing to help rescue sailors from the stricken warship, an act that could potentially endanger American service members in this and future wars.
The 312-foot Dena and its 130-member crew, many of them musicians in the Iranian navy band, had just finished participating in an Indian government naval exercise and cultural exchange that the U.S. Navy had also participated in and were on the way home on Wednesday. After clearing Sri Lanka, it was struck by a torpedo fired from a U.S. Navy submarine about 20 miles from the island’s southern tip. The weapon appears to have ruptured the hull from beneath, and the warship quickly sank. The submarine did not attempt to rescue Iranian sailors in the water.
Painting of a calico Persian cat, by Lynn Lachapelle Seguin
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt bragged about how the attack featured the first American use of a torpedo to sink a ship since World War II. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, narrating a video clip of the attack, used the same gloating tone. “An American submarine sunk an Iranian warship that thought it was safe in international waters. Instead, it was sunk by a torpedo. Quiet death,” he intoned.
Hegseth had previously mocked the “stupid rules of engagement” that aim to limit civilian deaths and other actions that could constitute war crimes.
“There is an affirmative duty to rescue under the Geneva Conventions,” said Mark Nevitt, a former Navy lawyer in the judge advocate general corps and now a law professor at Emory University.
He and other legal experts warn that disregarding those and other rules invites mistreatment, even death, to Americans who are shipwrecked or captured.
Yahoo News: Pete Hegseth Mocks ‘Iranians That Think They’re Gonna Live.’
In a preview of an upcoming 60 Minutes interview released on Friday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth mocked “Iranians that think they’re gonna live” while answering a question on reports that Russia provided Iran with intel to target American soldiers in the ongoing conflict.
In the clip, CBS News’ Major Garrett cited three sources “telling us that Russia is providing intelligence to Iran on U.S. positions and movements.”
“The average American might hear that and think that’s a big and dangerous deal,” continued Garrett. “Is it?”
“Well, we’re tracking everything,” responded Hegseth. “We have the best intelligence in the world… President [Donald Trump] has an incredible knack at knowing how to mitigate those risks, and so the American people can rest assured their commander in chief is well aware of who’s talking to who, and anything that shouldn’t be happening — whether it’s in public or backchanneled — is being confronted and confronted strongly.”
“So the American people can therefore expect conversations with the Russians to stop this?” clarified Garrett.
“Well, I,” Hegseth stumbled. “President Trump, as people have seen, has a unique relationship with a lot of world leaders, where he can get things done that other presidents — certainly [former President] Joe Biden —
“Well, I,” Hegseth stumbled. “President Trump, as people have seen, has a unique relationship with a lot of world leaders, where he can get things done that other presidents — certainly [former President] Joe Biden — never could have. And through direct conversations or indirect, through him one-to-one, or through his cabinet, messages definitely can be delivered.”
We’ll see. I have zero faith that Trump will stand up to Putin on anything.
The New York Times on the Russia story: Russia Is Sharing Intelligence With Iran, U.S. Officials Say.
Russia has provided intelligence to Iran during the U.S.-Israeli war, including satellite imagery showing the locations of warships and military personnel, according to U.S. officials.
The information sharing could complicate relations between the United States and Russia, given that President Trump has often taken a more conciliatory stance toward Moscow than his predecessors.
Persian cat by Carolee Vitaletti
But some of the officials played down the partnership, saying Russia has long provided similar intelligence to Iran. And it is not clear how much Tehran has been able to use the new intelligence, if at all. Iran has advanced missiles, but they lag far behind Russia’s and it is not clear Iran could use the intelligence to target a ship.
Furthermore, given the immense pressure of the combined U.S.-Israeli assault, which began last Saturday, Iran’s ability to launch missiles has been degraded, officials said.
But officials confirmed that Russia has provided updated intelligence on the position of U.S. assets since the beginning of the war, information meant to help Iran target the assets.
So far Iranian forces have not hit any U.S. warships, but they have struck at U.S. military bases, killing six service members in Kuwait and damaging facilities in Bahrain. Iranian drones have also struck a building housing the C.I.A. station in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, though no one was injured in that attack, officials said.
I guess we’ll eventually find out how effective Russia’s help is and whether Trump will do anything about it.
Two more stories that address possible outcomes of the Iran “war.”
The Washington Post (gift link): Intel report warns large-scale war ‘unlikely’ to oust Iran’s regime.
A classified report by the National Intelligence Council found that even a large-scale assault on Iran launched by the United States would be unlikely to oust the Islamic republic’s entrenched military and clerical establishment, a sobering assessment as the Trump administration raises the specter of an extended military campaign that officials sayhas “only just begun.”
The findings, confirmed to The Washington Post by three people familiar with the report’s contents, raise doubts about President Donald Trump’s declared plan to “clean out” Iran’s leadership structure and install a ruler of his choosing.
The report, completed about a week before the United States and Israel initiated the war on Feb. 28, outlined succession scenarios stemming from either a narrowly tailored campaign against Iran’s leaders or a broader assault against its leadership and government institutions, the people familiar with its findings said. In both cases, the intelligence concluded that Iran’s clerical and military establishment would respond to the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by following protocols designed to preserve continuity of power, these people said.
The prospect of Iran’s fragmented opposition taking control of the country was described as “unlikely,” said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a classified report.
On the other hand, maybe this is all just a distraction from the Epstein files. Read more with the gift link.
Peter Baker at The New York Times (gift link): Wars Often Lose Public Support Over Time. Trump Started This One Without Much.
President Trump likes to assert that he has accomplished things no other president has. With the opening of his military assault against Iran, he has achieved another distinction: He is the first president in the era of modern polling to take the United States to war without the support of the public.
Traditionally, Americans stand behind their president when he first orders troops into battle, generally sticking with him unless it drags on, casualties mount and victory seems increasingly elusive. With Mr. Trump’s war against Iran, the public has skipped the rally-around-the-president phase this time.
Support for his ferocious bombardment of Iran has ranged from 27 percent in a Reuters/Ipsos poll to 41 percent in a CNN survey, far below the level of public backing that Mr. Trump’s predecessors initially enjoyed when they used force overseas. Given that wars tend to grow less popular over time, the initial negative response portends political challenges for Mr. Trump and his fellow Republicans the longer the fighting continues.
The opposition is revealing about this particular moment in American history. A country already tired of decades of combat in the Middle East has shown little appetite for yet another adventure abroad. And the deep polarization of American politics only makes it harder to build support across lines. Even some Americans sympathetic to the goal of toppling the repressive, terrorist-sponsoring government in Tehran find it difficult to embrace Mr. Trump as commander in chief.
Moreover, unlike his predecessors, Mr. Trump has not done much to bring the public along, forgoing the usual tools of his office to explain to Americans what he is doing, why he is doing it and how it will end. Instead, he and his administration have offered contradictory accounts of what drove this decision and what victory would look like.
“As he has in many other areas, President Trump is pioneering a new approach,” said Peter D. Feaver, a national security aide under President George W. Bush during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “He has enjoyed considerable success in doing other things that previous presidents thought couldn’t or shouldn’t be done, but this is one of the biggest political gambles he has taken.”
The consequences are enormous for Mr. Trump’s presidency, for the success of the war and for the upcoming midterm elections, with Republicans already facing ominous signs that they could lose one if not both houses of Congress. The war power votes in the Senate and the House this week, in which Republicans backed Mr. Trump, may be featured in Democratic campaign ads this fall.
Use the gift link to read the rest.
Those are my recommended reads for today. What do you think? What else is on your mind?
#catArt #caturday #DonaldTrump #PersianCats #PeteHegseth #TrumpSWarInIran #USEconomy #viewsOfCatsInIran
-
Lazy Caturday Reads: Trump’s War on Iran
Good Day!!
Painting of a cat resting on a pillow next to a Muslim scholar in Cairo, by John Frederick Lewis (1805–1876)
Today I’m featuring Persian cats. It’s not the Iranian people’s fault that Trump is raining down hellfire on their country. According to Wikipedia, cats are the preferred pet in Iran; and Persian cats are the local favorite.
The Persian cat, also known as the Persian Longhair or simply Persian, is a long-haired traditional breed of cat characterised by a round face and petite, but not flat and not smashed in, muzzle. The short flat nose was created in the US from in-breeding and causes breathing difficulties in the breed, whereas, the traditional Persian breed has a petite nose which enables them to breathe without difficulties.
The first documented ancestors of Persian cats might have been imported into Italy from Khorasan as early as around 1620, but this has not been proven. Instead, there is stronger evidence for a longhaired cat breed being exported from Afghanistan and Iran/Persia from the 19th century onwards.[2][3][4] Persian cats have been widely recognised by the North-West European cat fancy since the 19th century,[5] and after World War II by breeders from North America, Australia and New Zealand.[5] Some cat fancier organisations’ breed standards subsume the Himalayan and Exotic Shorthair as variants of this breed, while others generally treat them as separate breeds.
The selective breeding carried out by breeders has allowed the development of a wide variety of coat colours,[5] but has also led to the creation of increasingly flat-faced Persian cats. Favoured by fanciers, this head structure can bring with it several health problems. As is the case with the Siamese breed, there have been efforts by some breeders to preserve the older type of cat, the Traditional Persian, which has a more pronounced muzzle.
Wikipedia on Islamic beliefs about cats:
In Islam, the domestic cat is regarded as ritually clean and thus holds a unique status in comparison to other companion animals, such as the domestic dog. Under Islamic law, cats are permitted to be kept by Muslims within their homes and other private and public spaces, including mosques. Likewise, if a person’s food or drink is sampled by a cat, it is not rendered impure or unfit for consumption, and water from which a cat has drunk is permissible to use for ablution.
Cats are believed by Muslims to possess barakah, which refers to a blessing power that is said to flow through those who are spiritually closest to God.[1][2] As such, they are widely acclaimed as the “quintessential pet” for a Muslim household.
I hope these cats will provide some respite from the horrible news.
Trump is really sounding drunk with power (what else is new?) on his illegal war on Iran. Yesterday, he demanded “unconditional surrender” from the Iranians.
Traditionall Persian cat
CNBC: Trump says no deal with Iran to end war without ‘unconditional surrender.’
President Donald Trump said in a social media post on Friday that there would be no deal to end the U.S. war against Iran without an “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” by Iran.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 900 points, or nearly 2%, after Trump’s demand, which he wrote on Truth Social. The S&P 500and Nasdaq Composite fell 1.6% each, and oil futures prices rose.
Trump said that after a surrender and “the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before.”
“IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. “MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!)” Trump wrote, echoing his “Make America Great” movement’s name.
Trump’s demand came as Iran has yet to pick a leader to replace Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed last weekend in an airstrike at the beginning of the war by the U.S. and Israel.
What the hell does that mean? It’s not even a declared war.
Later, the White House tried to clarify the demand: Trump to Axios: “Unconditional surrender” is when Iran “can’t fight any longer.”
President Trump told Axios Friday that his demand for Iran’s “unconditional surrender” could mean the complete destruction of the regime’s military capabilities — not necessarily a formal surrender.
- “Unconditional surrender could be that [the Iranians] announce it. But it could also be when they can’t fight any longer because they don’t have anyone or anything to fight with,” he said in a phone interview.
Why it matters: Trump’s explanation came hours after he appeared to leave no visible off-ramp for Iran, ruling out any kind of “deal” as he demanded “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” in a post on Truth Social.
— White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later said on Fox News that “unconditional surrender” means Trump determining “that Iran can no longer pose a threat to the U.S. and our troops in the Middle East.”
— Leavitt listed U.S. objectives as destroying Iran’s navy, eliminating its ballistic missile threat, ensuring it cannot obtain a nuclear weapon and weakening its regional proxies.
From The Guardian: Iran rejects Trump’s demand for unconditional surrender as a ‘dream.’
The president of Iran has rejected Donald Trump’s call for the country’s unconditional surrender as a “dream”, while issuing a rare apology for Iranian attacks that hit neighbouring states, even as missiles and drones continued to strike Gulf countries.
Moder type Persian cat
In a prerecorded address broadcast on state television on Saturday, Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, said the country would never capitulate, responding to remarks by the US president, who said on Friday that only Iran’s total submission could bring the war to an end.
Iran’s enemies, Pezeshkian said, “must take their dream of the Iranian people’s unconditional surrender to their graves”, in remarks that further escalate the eighth day of conflict, which has choked global oil supplies and cut world air travel.
During his speech, Pezeshkian also issued an apology to neighbouring states for Iran’s recent “actions”, in an apparent attempt to ease regional anger after Iranian strikes hit civilian targets in Gulf Arab countries.
Tehran has responded to attacks on its territory by targeting Israel, but also Gulf Arab states that host US military installations, while Israel has also launched intense strikes on Lebanon, where the Iran-backed armed group Hezbollah is based.
In response to Iran’s refusal to surrender, Trump issued more threats. Politico: Trump vows to hit ‘very hard’ after Iran’s president says he won’t surrender.
President Donald Trump announced plans to launch yet more strikes against Iran on Saturday, escalating his threats as the conflict with Iran enters its second week.
“Today Iran will be hit very hard!” he wrote on Truth Social Saturday morning. “Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death, because of Iran’s bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment in time.”
Islamic miniature depicting Abu Hudhayfa ibn Utba (right) informing As’ad ibn Zurara that he has converted to Islam, with the presence of a cat denoting his home’s ritual purity.
Trump’s threat came after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian labeled the president’s earlier call for Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” a “dream that they should take to their grave” in a speech broadcast on state television Saturday.
Pezeshkian also said his country would no longer strike its neighbors in the Middle East — so long as attacks against Iran weren’t being launched from those countries. Trump took credit for the new policy, writing on Truth Social that it “was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attack.”
“It is the first time that Iran has ever lost, in thousands of years, to surrounding Middle Eastern Countries,” he said. “They have said, ‘Thank you President Trump.’ I have said, ‘You’re welcome!’ Iran is no longer the ‘Bully of the Middle East,’ they are, instead, ‘THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST,’ and will be for many decades until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse!”
Trump is really full of himself. He even thinks he should help decide who Iran’s next leader will be!
Meanwhile, things here at home aren’t going so well.
Politico: Trump’s week: Poor jobs numbers, high gas prices and Noem’s ouster.
Donald Trump won reelection on the promise of restoring the economy and eliminating illegal immigration.
But in the last week, both issues have threatened to turn into liabilities: A stagnant labor market and soaring gas prices amid the Iran conflict are hammering the economy, and the ouster of Kristi Noem from the Department of Homeland Security has cast new light on the administration’s increasingly unpopular immigration agenda. The economic backdrop has grown ominous — Wall Street analysts are warning that surging oil prices could lead to stagflation — and the blitzkrieg of bad news has jeopardized the GOP’s ability to keep voters focused on Trump administration policies that were designed to help with the rising cost of living.
“If you combine an economy that people don’t like with a prolonged war that you know nobody in his base believes they voted for, that’s a toxic problem,” said one Trump ally granted anonymity to speak freely. While Trump isn’t on the ballot this year, his party needs the president’s poll numbers to improve to keep the House and Senate….
The Iran conflict has put immense upward pressure on oil and gas –- prices at the pump have climbed by more than 11 percent in a week. Now, with employers shedding payroll and Trump pressing reset on who’s leading his immigration agenda, the president is on the backfoot on the two issues he needs to own for his party to win the midterms….
The president, meanwhile, is also struggling with what was once his strongest and most defining issue — immigration. While the number of people crossing the southern border has fallen significantly, in part due to Trump administration efforts, the widely shared images of aggressive enforcement actions across the country have left even some of his supporters wincing. Other conservatives, still, are unhappy that those efforts have not gone far enough, falling short of the “mass deportations” he promised on the campaign trail.
Polling underscores the erosion of support. A recent NBC News poll found that 49 percent of adults strongly disapprove of Trump’s handling of border security and immigration, up from 38 percent last summer. Nearly three-quarters of the poll’s respondents said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement should be reformed or abolished.
Trump’s Thursday dismissal of Noem came after months of increasing frustration inside the White House with how she ran the department.
From Greg Sargent at The New Republic: Donald Trump’s Presidency Is in Free Fall.
Consider three of the biggest developments in our politics right now: We just learned that the economy lost 92,000 jobs in February, a capstone to a terrible year in terms of job creation. President Trump has fired widely despised Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, a key architect of his mass deportations. And reports are indicating that the killing of scores of Iranian schoolchildren might have been the handiwork of the United States.
What links all these things? In addition to the massive human toll they’re inflicting, they suggest that Trump is about to pull off a unique trifecta. He is squandering the advantage he and Republicans have enjoyed in recent years on three major GOP-friendly issues: The economy, immigration, and national security.
Painting by Tatjana Cechun
This isn’t meant as a political gotcha; it has important ideological and policy implications. When Trump took office last year, it was reasonable to fear that the American public would rally behind mass deportations and tariffs—that is, embrace two of the main tenets of right-wing nationalism. Meanwhile, the launch of the largest military attack in the Mideast in decades might have plausibly produced a rally-around-the-war-president effect.
None of that is happening. And that’s significant in not-so-obvious ways.
Let’s start with Trump and national security. According to an extraordinary video analysis by The New York Times, the horrific bombing of an elementary school in southern Iran—which killed 175 people, many children—occurred while the United States was conducting missile strikes in the area aimed at a nearby Iranian naval base.
What’s more, Reuters reports that military investigators now believe U.S. forces likely bombed the school. We should suspend final judgement, of course. But it’s looking very much like this atrocity—one of the worst massacres of civilians in memory—is the result of Trump’s war. Whatever we learn about it, there will inevitably be more such horrors.
Now look at this in the context of remarks from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House adviser Stephen Miller. Hegseth recently declared that the United States is dispensing with “stupid rules of engagement” and will no longer fight “politically correct wars.” Miller recently enthused that Trump’s military doesn’t have “its hands tied behind its back,” mocked the very idea of human rights, and insisted that “strength” and “force” and “power” are fundamentally all that matter in the international arena.
But we’re now learning why we have the sort of constraints on military conduct these men ridicule. “Trump, Miller and Hegseth’s FAFO approach to the use of official government force and violence comes with considerable risk,” Democratic Congressman Adam Smith told me, employing the acronym for “Fuck Around and Find Out.” Atrocities like the school bombing, he added, show the perils that come when we “brazenly dismiss any sort of rules of engagement designed to protect the lives and rights of civilians.”
Just a bit more:
The swaggering certainty of Hegseth and Miller, those two giants of American statecraft, is what’s notable here. As Alan Elrod writes at Liberal Currents, at times like this you can almost smell MAGA’s “bloodlust.” Clearly they have no doubt the public will rally behind this supposed display of Trump’s “strength.” Or maybe they don’t think it matters what the public thinks.
But it does matter. Data analyst G. Elliott Morris averaged high quality polling on Trump’s Iran invasion, and found that only 38 percent of respondents approve—the lowest initial support for an American war perhaps ever. Trump’s overall approval has also dropped a hair since the bombing began—it’s hovering at around 39-58—leading Morris to conclude that no rally-around-the-flag effect is materializing.
Also note that a CNN poll just showed that 59 percent don’t trust Trump to make the right decisions regarding the use of force in Iran, suggesting already-entrenched skepticism of Trump’s commander-in-chief abilities exactly when a “war president” boomlet might be expected to kick in. The school bombing will make this worse. In short, Trump has no built-in national security advantage. If anything he’s viewed as bad on it.
Read the rest at TNR.
Two more stories that show the callous nature of Trump’s war:
HuffPo: U.S. May Have Committed War Crime In Sinking Of Iranian Ship.
The U.S. torpedoing of an Iranian frigate off Sri Lanka this week may have violated the Geneva Conventions by failing to help rescue sailors from the stricken warship, an act that could potentially endanger American service members in this and future wars.
The 312-foot Dena and its 130-member crew, many of them musicians in the Iranian navy band, had just finished participating in an Indian government naval exercise and cultural exchange that the U.S. Navy had also participated in and were on the way home on Wednesday. After clearing Sri Lanka, it was struck by a torpedo fired from a U.S. Navy submarine about 20 miles from the island’s southern tip. The weapon appears to have ruptured the hull from beneath, and the warship quickly sank. The submarine did not attempt to rescue Iranian sailors in the water.
Painting of a calico Persian cat, by Lynn Lachapelle Seguin
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt bragged about how the attack featured the first American use of a torpedo to sink a ship since World War II. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, narrating a video clip of the attack, used the same gloating tone. “An American submarine sunk an Iranian warship that thought it was safe in international waters. Instead, it was sunk by a torpedo. Quiet death,” he intoned.
Hegseth had previously mocked the “stupid rules of engagement” that aim to limit civilian deaths and other actions that could constitute war crimes.
“There is an affirmative duty to rescue under the Geneva Conventions,” said Mark Nevitt, a former Navy lawyer in the judge advocate general corps and now a law professor at Emory University.
He and other legal experts warn that disregarding those and other rules invites mistreatment, even death, to Americans who are shipwrecked or captured.
Yahoo News: Pete Hegseth Mocks ‘Iranians That Think They’re Gonna Live.’
In a preview of an upcoming 60 Minutes interview released on Friday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth mocked “Iranians that think they’re gonna live” while answering a question on reports that Russia provided Iran with intel to target American soldiers in the ongoing conflict.
In the clip, CBS News’ Major Garrett cited three sources “telling us that Russia is providing intelligence to Iran on U.S. positions and movements.”
“The average American might hear that and think that’s a big and dangerous deal,” continued Garrett. “Is it?”
“Well, we’re tracking everything,” responded Hegseth. “We have the best intelligence in the world… President [Donald Trump] has an incredible knack at knowing how to mitigate those risks, and so the American people can rest assured their commander in chief is well aware of who’s talking to who, and anything that shouldn’t be happening — whether it’s in public or backchanneled — is being confronted and confronted strongly.”
“So the American people can therefore expect conversations with the Russians to stop this?” clarified Garrett.
“Well, I,” Hegseth stumbled. “President Trump, as people have seen, has a unique relationship with a lot of world leaders, where he can get things done that other presidents — certainly [former President] Joe Biden —
“Well, I,” Hegseth stumbled. “President Trump, as people have seen, has a unique relationship with a lot of world leaders, where he can get things done that other presidents — certainly [former President] Joe Biden — never could have. And through direct conversations or indirect, through him one-to-one, or through his cabinet, messages definitely can be delivered.”
We’ll see. I have zero faith that Trump will stand up to Putin on anything.
The New York Times on the Russia story: Russia Is Sharing Intelligence With Iran, U.S. Officials Say.
Russia has provided intelligence to Iran during the U.S.-Israeli war, including satellite imagery showing the locations of warships and military personnel, according to U.S. officials.
The information sharing could complicate relations between the United States and Russia, given that President Trump has often taken a more conciliatory stance toward Moscow than his predecessors.
Persian cat by Carolee Vitaletti
But some of the officials played down the partnership, saying Russia has long provided similar intelligence to Iran. And it is not clear how much Tehran has been able to use the new intelligence, if at all. Iran has advanced missiles, but they lag far behind Russia’s and it is not clear Iran could use the intelligence to target a ship.
Furthermore, given the immense pressure of the combined U.S.-Israeli assault, which began last Saturday, Iran’s ability to launch missiles has been degraded, officials said.
But officials confirmed that Russia has provided updated intelligence on the position of U.S. assets since the beginning of the war, information meant to help Iran target the assets.
So far Iranian forces have not hit any U.S. warships, but they have struck at U.S. military bases, killing six service members in Kuwait and damaging facilities in Bahrain. Iranian drones have also struck a building housing the C.I.A. station in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, though no one was injured in that attack, officials said.
I guess we’ll eventually find out how effective Russia’s help is and whether Trump will do anything about it.
Two more stories that address possible outcomes of the Iran “war.”
The Washington Post (gift link): Intel report warns large-scale war ‘unlikely’ to oust Iran’s regime.
A classified report by the National Intelligence Council found that even a large-scale assault on Iran launched by the United States would be unlikely to oust the Islamic republic’s entrenched military and clerical establishment, a sobering assessment as the Trump administration raises the specter of an extended military campaign that officials sayhas “only just begun.”
The findings, confirmed to The Washington Post by three people familiar with the report’s contents, raise doubts about President Donald Trump’s declared plan to “clean out” Iran’s leadership structure and install a ruler of his choosing.
The report, completed about a week before the United States and Israel initiated the war on Feb. 28, outlined succession scenarios stemming from either a narrowly tailored campaign against Iran’s leaders or a broader assault against its leadership and government institutions, the people familiar with its findings said. In both cases, the intelligence concluded that Iran’s clerical and military establishment would respond to the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by following protocols designed to preserve continuity of power, these people said.
The prospect of Iran’s fragmented opposition taking control of the country was described as “unlikely,” said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a classified report.
On the other hand, maybe this is all just a distraction from the Epstein files. Read more with the gift link.
Peter Baker at The New York Times (gift link): Wars Often Lose Public Support Over Time. Trump Started This One Without Much.
President Trump likes to assert that he has accomplished things no other president has. With the opening of his military assault against Iran, he has achieved another distinction: He is the first president in the era of modern polling to take the United States to war without the support of the public.
Traditionally, Americans stand behind their president when he first orders troops into battle, generally sticking with him unless it drags on, casualties mount and victory seems increasingly elusive. With Mr. Trump’s war against Iran, the public has skipped the rally-around-the-president phase this time.
Support for his ferocious bombardment of Iran has ranged from 27 percent in a Reuters/Ipsos poll to 41 percent in a CNN survey, far below the level of public backing that Mr. Trump’s predecessors initially enjoyed when they used force overseas. Given that wars tend to grow less popular over time, the initial negative response portends political challenges for Mr. Trump and his fellow Republicans the longer the fighting continues.
The opposition is revealing about this particular moment in American history. A country already tired of decades of combat in the Middle East has shown little appetite for yet another adventure abroad. And the deep polarization of American politics only makes it harder to build support across lines. Even some Americans sympathetic to the goal of toppling the repressive, terrorist-sponsoring government in Tehran find it difficult to embrace Mr. Trump as commander in chief.
Moreover, unlike his predecessors, Mr. Trump has not done much to bring the public along, forgoing the usual tools of his office to explain to Americans what he is doing, why he is doing it and how it will end. Instead, he and his administration have offered contradictory accounts of what drove this decision and what victory would look like.
“As he has in many other areas, President Trump is pioneering a new approach,” said Peter D. Feaver, a national security aide under President George W. Bush during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “He has enjoyed considerable success in doing other things that previous presidents thought couldn’t or shouldn’t be done, but this is one of the biggest political gambles he has taken.”
The consequences are enormous for Mr. Trump’s presidency, for the success of the war and for the upcoming midterm elections, with Republicans already facing ominous signs that they could lose one if not both houses of Congress. The war power votes in the Senate and the House this week, in which Republicans backed Mr. Trump, may be featured in Democratic campaign ads this fall.
Use the gift link to read the rest.
Those are my recommended reads for today. What do you think? What else is on your mind?
#catArt #caturday #DonaldTrump #PersianCats #PeteHegseth #TrumpSWarInIran #USEconomy #viewsOfCatsInIran
-
Microsoft’s “Microslop” Discord Ban Backfires: What AI Builders Can Learn from This Epic Moderation Fail
2,644 words, 14 minutes read time.
The “Microslop” Catalyst: When Automated Moderation Becomes a PR Liability
The recent escalation on Microsoft’s official Copilot Discord server serves as a stark reminder that in the high-stakes world of generative AI, the community’s perception of quality is as vital as the underlying architecture itself. In early March 2026, what began as a routine effort to maintain decorum within a product-support hub rapidly spiraled into a live case study of the Streisand Effect. Reports from multiple industry outlets confirmed that Microsoft had implemented a blunt, automated keyword filter designed to silently delete any message containing the term “Microslop.” This derogatory portmanteau has been increasingly used by developers and power users to describe what they perceive as low-quality, intrusive, or “sloppy” AI integrations within the Windows ecosystem. While the corporate intent was likely to prune what a spokesperson later categorized as “coordinated spam,” the execution triggered a tidal wave of digital civil disobedience. Instead of silencing the critics, the automated system provided a focal point for them, validating the sentiment that the tech giant was more interested in brand preservation than addressing the technical grievances that birthed the nickname.
Analyzing the root of this frustration reveals that the term “slop” is often an emotional reaction to a very real technical burden placed on the developer community. For instance, attempting to upgrade a SharePoint Framework (SPFx) project from version 1.14.x to the recently released 1.22.x is frequently described by those in the trenches as a “blood bath” of error messages and cryptic warnings. The transition is not merely a version bump; it is an overhaul of the build toolchain that often leaves developers debugging deep-seated errors that appear to stem from AI-generated or “slop-induced” bugs within M365 and community plug-ins. When a developer spends three days chasing an error only to find it buried in a low-quality, automated code suggestion or a poorly integrated community tool, the “Microslop” label stops being a joke and starts being an accurate description of a broken workflow. This disconnect between Microsoft’s “AI-first” marketing and the gritty, error-prone reality of its development frameworks is precisely why a simple keyword filter was never going to be enough to contain the community’s mounting resentment.
The Streisand Effect: How Censorship Becomes a Signal
The failure of the “Microslop” ban is a textbook example of how heavy-handed moderation can amplify the very information it seeks to suppress. In the context of AI builders, this incident highlights the danger of using automated tools to sanitize discourse, as it inadvertently creates a “badge of resistance” for the user base. Every bypassed filter and every subsequent ban on the Copilot Discord became a signal to the broader industry that there was a significant rift between Microsoft’s narrative of AI “sophistication” and the community’s lived experience with the product. Furthermore, by escalating from keyword filtering to a full server lockdown, Microsoft effectively confirmed the power of the “Microslop” label. This elevated the term from a minor annoyance to a headline-grabbing symbol of corporate insecurity, demonstrating that the more a corporation tries to hide a piece of information, the more the public will seek it out and amplify it.
This phenomenon is particularly dangerous for AI-centric companies because the technology itself is already under intense scrutiny for its reliability and ethical implications. If a builder cannot manage a community hub without resorting to blunt-force censorship, it raises uncomfortable questions about how they manage the more complex, nuanced guardrails required for the Large Language Models (LLMs) themselves. The internet rarely leaves such attempts at suppression unpunished; in this case, the ban led to the creation of browser extensions and scripts specifically designed to spread the nickname across the web. This demonstrates that in 2026, community management is no longer just an administrative task; it is a critical component of brand integrity that requires a much more sophisticated approach than a simple “find and replace” blocklist. Builders must recognize that transparency is the only effective dampener for the Streisand Effect, as any attempt to use automation to hide dissatisfaction only serves to validate the critics.
Why the “Slop” Narrative Resonates: The Technical Quality Gap
At the heart of the “Microslop” controversy lies a deeper, more substantive issue regarding the growing perception that AI integration has entered a period of diminishing returns, often referred to as the “slop” era. The term “slop” gained significant cultural weight after major linguistic authorities and industry analysts began using it to specifically define the flood of low-quality, mass-produced AI content clogging the modern internet. When users apply this term to a tech giant, they are not merely engaging in schoolyard insults; they are expressing a technical frustration with the way generative AI features have been integrated into a legacy operating system. Analyzing the user feedback leading up to the Discord lockdown reveals a clear pattern of “quantity over quality” in the deployment of Copilot. Developers and power users have documented numerous instances where AI components were perceived as being forced into core OS functions like Notepad, File Explorer, and Task Manager, often at the expense of system latency and overall stability.
This quality gap is precisely what gave the “Microslop” nickname its viral potency, as it hit upon a verifiable truth regarding the current state of the software. If the AI integration were universally recognized as seamless, high-value, and technically flawless, the derogatory label would have failed to gain traction among the engineering community. However, because the term captured a widespread sentiment that the software was becoming bloated with unrefined, “sloppy” code that prioritizes corporate AI metrics over actual user utility, the attempt to ban the word felt like an attempt to ban the truth itself. For AI builders, this serves as a critical warning that one cannot moderate their way out of a fundamental quality problem. If a community begins to categorize a product’s output as “slop,” the correct response is not to update the server’s AutoMod settings to include the word on a prohibited list; the solution is to re-evaluate the product roadmap and address the technical regressions causing the friction.
Root Cause Analysis: The Failure of Brittle Automation in Community Governance
The technical root cause of the Discord meltdown can be traced back to the implementation of “naive” or “brittle” automation—a common pitfall for organizations that treat community management as a purely administrative task. Microsoft’s moderation team relied on a basic fixed-string match filter, which is the mos
Furthermore, the automation failed to account for context, which is the most vital component of any successful moderation strategy. The bot reportedly flagged every instance of the word “Microslop,” regardless of whether the user was using it as an insult, asking a question about the controversy, or providing constructive criticism. By labeling a corporate nickname with the same “inappropriate” tag usually reserved for hate speech or harassment, the automated system actively insulted the intelligence of the user base. This lack of nuance in the AI-driven moderation stack created a pressure cooker environment where every automated deletion was viewed as an act of corporate censorship. For AI builders, the lesson is that any automation deployed for community governance must be as sophisticated as the product it supports. Relying on 1990s-era keyword filtering to manage a 2026-era AI community is a recipe for disaster, as it signals a lack of technical effort that only further reinforces the “slop” narrative the organization is trying to escape.
The Strategic Shift: Moving Beyond Blunt Force Suppression
The failure of the “Microslop” ban highlights a critical strategic inflection point for AI builders who must navigate the increasingly volatile waters of developer communities. Relying on blunt-force suppression as a first-line defense against product criticism is a strategy rooted in legacy corporate communication models that are incompatible with the transparent, decentralized nature of modern technical hubs. When a tech giant attempts to scrub a derogatory term from its digital ecosystem, it effectively abdicates its role as a collaborator and assumes the role of an adversary. This shift in posture is particularly damaging in the context of generative AI, where the success of a platform like Copilot is heavily dependent on the feedback loops and integrations created by the very developers who feel alienated by such heavy-handed moderation. Instead of viewing these “slop” accusations as a nuisance to be silenced, sophisticated AI organizations should view them as high-fidelity data points indicating where the gap between marketing hype and functional utility has become too wide to ignore.
Consequently, the move toward resilient community management requires a transition from “policing” to “pivoting.” Analyzing the fallout from the March 2026 lockdown reveals that the most effective way to neutralize a pejorative nickname is to address the technical deficiencies that gave the name its power. For instance, if users are labeling an AI integration as “slop” due to high latency, resource bloat, or inconsistent output, the strategic response should involve a public-facing commitment to performance benchmarks and a transparent roadmap for optimization. By engaging with the substance of the criticism rather than the semantics of the label, a builder can naturally erode the legitimacy of the mockery. Microsoft’s decision to hide behind a locked Discord server suggests a lack of preparedness for the “friction” that inevitably accompanies the rollout of transformative technologies. To avoid this pitfall, builders must ensure that their community teams are empowered with technical context and the authority to translate community outrage into actionable product requirements, rather than being relegated to the role of digital janitors tasked with sweeping dissent under the rug.
Building Resilience: Lessons in Context-Aware Governance
For AI startups and established enterprises alike, the “Microslop” debacle provides a definitive masterclass in the necessity of context-aware governance. The primary technical takeaway is that community moderation in 2026 must be as intellectually rigorous as the models being developed. A sophisticated governance stack would utilize sentiment analysis and intent recognition to differentiate between a user engaging in harassment and a user expressing a legitimate, albeit sarcastically phrased, grievance. By failing to integrate these more nuanced AI capabilities into their own moderation tools, Microsoft inadvertently signaled a lack of confidence in the very technology they are asking the world to adopt. If an AI leader cannot trust its own systems to handle a Discord meme without resorting to a total server blackout, it becomes significantly harder to convince enterprise clients that the same technology is ready to handle mission-critical business logic or sensitive customer interactions.
Furthermore, building a resilient community requires a fundamental acceptance of the “ugly” side of product development. In the age of social media and rapid-fire developer feedback, mistakes will be memed, and failures will be christened with catchy, derogatory nicknames. Attempting to legislate these memes out of existence is a losing battle that only serves to accelerate the Streisand Effect. Instead, AI builders should focus on creating “high-trust environments” where users feel that their feedback—no matter how unpolished or “sloppy” it may be—is being ingested as a valuable resource. This involves maintaining open channels even during a PR crisis and resisting the urge to implement “emergency” filters that treat your most vocal users like hostile actors. By prioritizing stability, transparency, and technical excellence over brand hygiene, organizations can transform a potential “Microslop” moment into a demonstration of corporate maturity and a commitment to long-term product quality.
From Damage Control to Product Discipline: Reclaiming the Narrative
The ultimate fallout of the Microsoft Discord lockdown serves as a definitive case study in why AI builders must prioritize technical discipline over narrative control. When a corporation attempts to “engineer” a community’s vocabulary through restrictive automation, it inadvertently signals a lack of confidence in the underlying product’s ability to speak for itself. Analyzing the broader industry trends of 2026, it becomes clear that the “slop” label is not merely a social media trend but a technical critique of the current state of LLM integration. For a developer audience, the transition from “Microsoft” to “Microslop” in common parlance was a direct reaction to perceived regressions in software performance and the intrusion of non-essential AI telemetry into stable workflows. By focusing on the removal of the word rather than the remediation of the code, Microsoft missed a critical opportunity to demonstrate the “sophistication” that CEO Satya Nadella has publicly championed. Builders must realize that in a highly literate technical ecosystem, the only way to effectively kill a derogatory meme is to make it irrelevant through superior engineering and undeniable user value.
Furthermore, the “Microslop” incident underscores the necessity of a unified strategy between product engineering and community management. In many large-scale tech organizations, these departments operate in silos, leading to situations where a community manager implements a blunt-force keyword filter without realizing it contradicts the broader corporate message of AI-driven nuance and intelligence. This strategic misalignment is what allowed a minor moderation decision to balloon into a global PR crisis that dominated tech headlines for a week. To build a resilient AI brand, organizations must ensure that their automated governance tools are reflective of their core technological promises. If your product is marketed as an “intelligent companion,” your moderation bot cannot behave like a primitive 1990s-era blacklist. Moving forward, the industry must adopt a “feedback-first” architecture where automated tools are used to categorize and elevate user frustration to engineering teams, rather than acting as a digital firewall designed to protect executive sensibilities from the harsh reality of user sentiment.
Conclusion: The Lasting Legacy of the “Slop” Era
The March 2026 Discord lockdown will likely be remembered as the moment “Microslop” transitioned from a niche joke to a permanent fixture of the AI era’s vocabulary. Microsoft’s attempt to use automated moderation as a shield against criticism backfired because it ignored the fundamental law of the digital age: the more you try to hide a grievance, the more you validate its existence. For those of us building in the AI space, the lessons are clear and uncompromising. We must build with transparency, moderate with context, and never mistake a blunt-force keyword filter for a comprehensive community strategy. If we want our products to be associated with innovation rather than “slop,” we must earn that reputation through technical excellence and genuine engagement, not through the silent deletion of our critics’ messages. In the end, Microsoft didn’t just ban a word; they inadvertently launched a movement, proving that even the world’s most powerful tech companies remain vulnerable to the power of a well-timed, nine-letter meme and the undeniable force of the Streisand Effect.
Call to Action
If this breakdown helped you think a little clearer about the threats out there, don’t just click away. Subscribe for more no-nonsense security insights, drop a comment with your thoughts or questions, or reach out if there’s a topic you want me to tackle next. Stay sharp out there.
D. Bryan King
Sources
- PCMag: Microsoft Effort to Ban ‘Microslop’ on Copilot Discord Didn’t Go As Planned
- Windows Latest: Microsoft Locks Copilot Discord After Moderation Backlash
- Futurism: Microsoft Bans “Microslop” on Discord, Gets So Humiliated It Locks Server
- Gizmodo: Microsoft Bans Term ‘Microslop’ From Official Discord Server
- PC Gamer: Microsoft banned the word ‘Microslop’ in its Copilot Discord server
- It’s FOSS: Microsoft Locks Down Discord Server Over “Microslop” Posts
- Slashdot: Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ On Its Discord, Then Locks the Server
- Ground News: Microsoft Locks Down Discord Server After Microslop Ban Backfires
- Mysterium VPN: Microsoft Banned “Microslop” on Discord, Then Panicked
- Kotaku: Flood Of ‘Microslop’ Messages Forces Microsoft’s Official Copilot AI Discord Into Lockdown
- WinBuzzer: Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ on Discord, Locks Server After Backlash
- NIST: AI Risk Management Framework
- CISA: Secure by Design Principles for AI
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.
Related Posts
Rate this:
#AIBuilders #AIDisruption #AIEthics #AIFeedbackLoops #AIHallucinations #AIInfrastructure #AIIntegration #AIMarketPerception #AIProductStrategy #AIReliability #AISecurity #AISlop #AISophistication #AITransparency #AutomatedModeration #BrandIntegrity #BuildToolchain #codeQuality #CommunityManagement #CommunityModeration #ContextAwareModeration #Copilot #CorporateCensorship #developerExperience #DeveloperFriction #DeveloperRelations #DigitalCivilDisobedience #DiscordBan #DiscordLockdown #enterpriseAI #FeatureCreep #generativeAI #Ghostwriting #GulpToHeft #KeywordFiltering #LLMGuardrails #M365Plugins #Microslop #Microsoft #Microsoft365 #MicrosoftRecall #OpenSourceCommunity #ProductManagement #SatyaNadella #SentimentAnalysis #SharePointFramework122 #SoftwareBloat #SoftwareLifecycle #SoftwareQuality #SPFx114 #SPFxUpgrade #StreisandEffect #TechIndustryTrends2026 #TechPRFailure #TechnicalBlogging #technicalDebt #userPrivacy #UserTrust #Windows11AI -
Microsoft’s “Microslop” Discord Ban Backfires: What AI Builders Can Learn from This Epic Moderation Fail
2,644 words, 14 minutes read time.
The “Microslop” Catalyst: When Automated Moderation Becomes a PR Liability
The recent escalation on Microsoft’s official Copilot Discord server serves as a stark reminder that in the high-stakes world of generative AI, the community’s perception of quality is as vital as the underlying architecture itself. In early March 2026, what began as a routine effort to maintain decorum within a product-support hub rapidly spiraled into a live case study of the Streisand Effect. Reports from multiple industry outlets confirmed that Microsoft had implemented a blunt, automated keyword filter designed to silently delete any message containing the term “Microslop.” This derogatory portmanteau has been increasingly used by developers and power users to describe what they perceive as low-quality, intrusive, or “sloppy” AI integrations within the Windows ecosystem. While the corporate intent was likely to prune what a spokesperson later categorized as “coordinated spam,” the execution triggered a tidal wave of digital civil disobedience. Instead of silencing the critics, the automated system provided a focal point for them, validating the sentiment that the tech giant was more interested in brand preservation than addressing the technical grievances that birthed the nickname.
Analyzing the root of this frustration reveals that the term “slop” is often an emotional reaction to a very real technical burden placed on the developer community. For instance, attempting to upgrade a SharePoint Framework (SPFx) project from version 1.14.x to the recently released 1.22.x is frequently described by those in the trenches as a “blood bath” of error messages and cryptic warnings. The transition is not merely a version bump; it is an overhaul of the build toolchain that often leaves developers debugging deep-seated errors that appear to stem from AI-generated or “slop-induced” bugs within M365 and community plug-ins. When a developer spends three days chasing an error only to find it buried in a low-quality, automated code suggestion or a poorly integrated community tool, the “Microslop” label stops being a joke and starts being an accurate description of a broken workflow. This disconnect between Microsoft’s “AI-first” marketing and the gritty, error-prone reality of its development frameworks is precisely why a simple keyword filter was never going to be enough to contain the community’s mounting resentment.
The Streisand Effect: How Censorship Becomes a Signal
The failure of the “Microslop” ban is a textbook example of how heavy-handed moderation can amplify the very information it seeks to suppress. In the context of AI builders, this incident highlights the danger of using automated tools to sanitize discourse, as it inadvertently creates a “badge of resistance” for the user base. Every bypassed filter and every subsequent ban on the Copilot Discord became a signal to the broader industry that there was a significant rift between Microsoft’s narrative of AI “sophistication” and the community’s lived experience with the product. Furthermore, by escalating from keyword filtering to a full server lockdown, Microsoft effectively confirmed the power of the “Microslop” label. This elevated the term from a minor annoyance to a headline-grabbing symbol of corporate insecurity, demonstrating that the more a corporation tries to hide a piece of information, the more the public will seek it out and amplify it.
This phenomenon is particularly dangerous for AI-centric companies because the technology itself is already under intense scrutiny for its reliability and ethical implications. If a builder cannot manage a community hub without resorting to blunt-force censorship, it raises uncomfortable questions about how they manage the more complex, nuanced guardrails required for the Large Language Models (LLMs) themselves. The internet rarely leaves such attempts at suppression unpunished; in this case, the ban led to the creation of browser extensions and scripts specifically designed to spread the nickname across the web. This demonstrates that in 2026, community management is no longer just an administrative task; it is a critical component of brand integrity that requires a much more sophisticated approach than a simple “find and replace” blocklist. Builders must recognize that transparency is the only effective dampener for the Streisand Effect, as any attempt to use automation to hide dissatisfaction only serves to validate the critics.
Why the “Slop” Narrative Resonates: The Technical Quality Gap
At the heart of the “Microslop” controversy lies a deeper, more substantive issue regarding the growing perception that AI integration has entered a period of diminishing returns, often referred to as the “slop” era. The term “slop” gained significant cultural weight after major linguistic authorities and industry analysts began using it to specifically define the flood of low-quality, mass-produced AI content clogging the modern internet. When users apply this term to a tech giant, they are not merely engaging in schoolyard insults; they are expressing a technical frustration with the way generative AI features have been integrated into a legacy operating system. Analyzing the user feedback leading up to the Discord lockdown reveals a clear pattern of “quantity over quality” in the deployment of Copilot. Developers and power users have documented numerous instances where AI components were perceived as being forced into core OS functions like Notepad, File Explorer, and Task Manager, often at the expense of system latency and overall stability.
This quality gap is precisely what gave the “Microslop” nickname its viral potency, as it hit upon a verifiable truth regarding the current state of the software. If the AI integration were universally recognized as seamless, high-value, and technically flawless, the derogatory label would have failed to gain traction among the engineering community. However, because the term captured a widespread sentiment that the software was becoming bloated with unrefined, “sloppy” code that prioritizes corporate AI metrics over actual user utility, the attempt to ban the word felt like an attempt to ban the truth itself. For AI builders, this serves as a critical warning that one cannot moderate their way out of a fundamental quality problem. If a community begins to categorize a product’s output as “slop,” the correct response is not to update the server’s AutoMod settings to include the word on a prohibited list; the solution is to re-evaluate the product roadmap and address the technical regressions causing the friction.
Root Cause Analysis: The Failure of Brittle Automation in Community Governance
The technical root cause of the Discord meltdown can be traced back to the implementation of “naive” or “brittle” automation—a common pitfall for organizations that treat community management as a purely administrative task. Microsoft’s moderation team relied on a basic fixed-string match filter, which is the mos
Furthermore, the automation failed to account for context, which is the most vital component of any successful moderation strategy. The bot reportedly flagged every instance of the word “Microslop,” regardless of whether the user was using it as an insult, asking a question about the controversy, or providing constructive criticism. By labeling a corporate nickname with the same “inappropriate” tag usually reserved for hate speech or harassment, the automated system actively insulted the intelligence of the user base. This lack of nuance in the AI-driven moderation stack created a pressure cooker environment where every automated deletion was viewed as an act of corporate censorship. For AI builders, the lesson is that any automation deployed for community governance must be as sophisticated as the product it supports. Relying on 1990s-era keyword filtering to manage a 2026-era AI community is a recipe for disaster, as it signals a lack of technical effort that only further reinforces the “slop” narrative the organization is trying to escape.
The Strategic Shift: Moving Beyond Blunt Force Suppression
The failure of the “Microslop” ban highlights a critical strategic inflection point for AI builders who must navigate the increasingly volatile waters of developer communities. Relying on blunt-force suppression as a first-line defense against product criticism is a strategy rooted in legacy corporate communication models that are incompatible with the transparent, decentralized nature of modern technical hubs. When a tech giant attempts to scrub a derogatory term from its digital ecosystem, it effectively abdicates its role as a collaborator and assumes the role of an adversary. This shift in posture is particularly damaging in the context of generative AI, where the success of a platform like Copilot is heavily dependent on the feedback loops and integrations created by the very developers who feel alienated by such heavy-handed moderation. Instead of viewing these “slop” accusations as a nuisance to be silenced, sophisticated AI organizations should view them as high-fidelity data points indicating where the gap between marketing hype and functional utility has become too wide to ignore.
Consequently, the move toward resilient community management requires a transition from “policing” to “pivoting.” Analyzing the fallout from the March 2026 lockdown reveals that the most effective way to neutralize a pejorative nickname is to address the technical deficiencies that gave the name its power. For instance, if users are labeling an AI integration as “slop” due to high latency, resource bloat, or inconsistent output, the strategic response should involve a public-facing commitment to performance benchmarks and a transparent roadmap for optimization. By engaging with the substance of the criticism rather than the semantics of the label, a builder can naturally erode the legitimacy of the mockery. Microsoft’s decision to hide behind a locked Discord server suggests a lack of preparedness for the “friction” that inevitably accompanies the rollout of transformative technologies. To avoid this pitfall, builders must ensure that their community teams are empowered with technical context and the authority to translate community outrage into actionable product requirements, rather than being relegated to the role of digital janitors tasked with sweeping dissent under the rug.
Building Resilience: Lessons in Context-Aware Governance
For AI startups and established enterprises alike, the “Microslop” debacle provides a definitive masterclass in the necessity of context-aware governance. The primary technical takeaway is that community moderation in 2026 must be as intellectually rigorous as the models being developed. A sophisticated governance stack would utilize sentiment analysis and intent recognition to differentiate between a user engaging in harassment and a user expressing a legitimate, albeit sarcastically phrased, grievance. By failing to integrate these more nuanced AI capabilities into their own moderation tools, Microsoft inadvertently signaled a lack of confidence in the very technology they are asking the world to adopt. If an AI leader cannot trust its own systems to handle a Discord meme without resorting to a total server blackout, it becomes significantly harder to convince enterprise clients that the same technology is ready to handle mission-critical business logic or sensitive customer interactions.
Furthermore, building a resilient community requires a fundamental acceptance of the “ugly” side of product development. In the age of social media and rapid-fire developer feedback, mistakes will be memed, and failures will be christened with catchy, derogatory nicknames. Attempting to legislate these memes out of existence is a losing battle that only serves to accelerate the Streisand Effect. Instead, AI builders should focus on creating “high-trust environments” where users feel that their feedback—no matter how unpolished or “sloppy” it may be—is being ingested as a valuable resource. This involves maintaining open channels even during a PR crisis and resisting the urge to implement “emergency” filters that treat your most vocal users like hostile actors. By prioritizing stability, transparency, and technical excellence over brand hygiene, organizations can transform a potential “Microslop” moment into a demonstration of corporate maturity and a commitment to long-term product quality.
From Damage Control to Product Discipline: Reclaiming the Narrative
The ultimate fallout of the Microsoft Discord lockdown serves as a definitive case study in why AI builders must prioritize technical discipline over narrative control. When a corporation attempts to “engineer” a community’s vocabulary through restrictive automation, it inadvertently signals a lack of confidence in the underlying product’s ability to speak for itself. Analyzing the broader industry trends of 2026, it becomes clear that the “slop” label is not merely a social media trend but a technical critique of the current state of LLM integration. For a developer audience, the transition from “Microsoft” to “Microslop” in common parlance was a direct reaction to perceived regressions in software performance and the intrusion of non-essential AI telemetry into stable workflows. By focusing on the removal of the word rather than the remediation of the code, Microsoft missed a critical opportunity to demonstrate the “sophistication” that CEO Satya Nadella has publicly championed. Builders must realize that in a highly literate technical ecosystem, the only way to effectively kill a derogatory meme is to make it irrelevant through superior engineering and undeniable user value.
Furthermore, the “Microslop” incident underscores the necessity of a unified strategy between product engineering and community management. In many large-scale tech organizations, these departments operate in silos, leading to situations where a community manager implements a blunt-force keyword filter without realizing it contradicts the broader corporate message of AI-driven nuance and intelligence. This strategic misalignment is what allowed a minor moderation decision to balloon into a global PR crisis that dominated tech headlines for a week. To build a resilient AI brand, organizations must ensure that their automated governance tools are reflective of their core technological promises. If your product is marketed as an “intelligent companion,” your moderation bot cannot behave like a primitive 1990s-era blacklist. Moving forward, the industry must adopt a “feedback-first” architecture where automated tools are used to categorize and elevate user frustration to engineering teams, rather than acting as a digital firewall designed to protect executive sensibilities from the harsh reality of user sentiment.
Conclusion: The Lasting Legacy of the “Slop” Era
The March 2026 Discord lockdown will likely be remembered as the moment “Microslop” transitioned from a niche joke to a permanent fixture of the AI era’s vocabulary. Microsoft’s attempt to use automated moderation as a shield against criticism backfired because it ignored the fundamental law of the digital age: the more you try to hide a grievance, the more you validate its existence. For those of us building in the AI space, the lessons are clear and uncompromising. We must build with transparency, moderate with context, and never mistake a blunt-force keyword filter for a comprehensive community strategy. If we want our products to be associated with innovation rather than “slop,” we must earn that reputation through technical excellence and genuine engagement, not through the silent deletion of our critics’ messages. In the end, Microsoft didn’t just ban a word; they inadvertently launched a movement, proving that even the world’s most powerful tech companies remain vulnerable to the power of a well-timed, nine-letter meme and the undeniable force of the Streisand Effect.
Call to Action
If this breakdown helped you think a little clearer about the threats out there, don’t just click away. Subscribe for more no-nonsense security insights, drop a comment with your thoughts or questions, or reach out if there’s a topic you want me to tackle next. Stay sharp out there.
D. Bryan King
Sources
- PCMag: Microsoft Effort to Ban ‘Microslop’ on Copilot Discord Didn’t Go As Planned
- Windows Latest: Microsoft Locks Copilot Discord After Moderation Backlash
- Futurism: Microsoft Bans “Microslop” on Discord, Gets So Humiliated It Locks Server
- Gizmodo: Microsoft Bans Term ‘Microslop’ From Official Discord Server
- PC Gamer: Microsoft banned the word ‘Microslop’ in its Copilot Discord server
- It’s FOSS: Microsoft Locks Down Discord Server Over “Microslop” Posts
- Slashdot: Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ On Its Discord, Then Locks the Server
- Ground News: Microsoft Locks Down Discord Server After Microslop Ban Backfires
- Mysterium VPN: Microsoft Banned “Microslop” on Discord, Then Panicked
- Kotaku: Flood Of ‘Microslop’ Messages Forces Microsoft’s Official Copilot AI Discord Into Lockdown
- WinBuzzer: Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ on Discord, Locks Server After Backlash
- NIST: AI Risk Management Framework
- CISA: Secure by Design Principles for AI
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.
Related Posts
Rate this:
#AIBuilders #AIDisruption #AIEthics #AIFeedbackLoops #AIHallucinations #AIInfrastructure #AIIntegration #AIMarketPerception #AIProductStrategy #AIReliability #AISecurity #AISlop #AISophistication #AITransparency #AutomatedModeration #BrandIntegrity #BuildToolchain #codeQuality #CommunityManagement #CommunityModeration #ContextAwareModeration #Copilot #CorporateCensorship #developerExperience #DeveloperFriction #DeveloperRelations #DigitalCivilDisobedience #DiscordBan #DiscordLockdown #enterpriseAI #FeatureCreep #generativeAI #Ghostwriting #GulpToHeft #KeywordFiltering #LLMGuardrails #M365Plugins #Microslop #Microsoft #Microsoft365 #MicrosoftRecall #OpenSourceCommunity #ProductManagement #SatyaNadella #SentimentAnalysis #SharePointFramework122 #SoftwareBloat #SoftwareLifecycle #SoftwareQuality #SPFx114 #SPFxUpgrade #StreisandEffect #TechIndustryTrends2026 #TechPRFailure #TechnicalBlogging #technicalDebt #userPrivacy #UserTrust #Windows11AI -
Microsoft’s “Microslop” Discord Ban Backfires: What AI Builders Can Learn from This Epic Moderation Fail
2,644 words, 14 minutes read time.
The “Microslop” Catalyst: When Automated Moderation Becomes a PR Liability
The recent escalation on Microsoft’s official Copilot Discord server serves as a stark reminder that in the high-stakes world of generative AI, the community’s perception of quality is as vital as the underlying architecture itself. In early March 2026, what began as a routine effort to maintain decorum within a product-support hub rapidly spiraled into a live case study of the Streisand Effect. Reports from multiple industry outlets confirmed that Microsoft had implemented a blunt, automated keyword filter designed to silently delete any message containing the term “Microslop.” This derogatory portmanteau has been increasingly used by developers and power users to describe what they perceive as low-quality, intrusive, or “sloppy” AI integrations within the Windows ecosystem. While the corporate intent was likely to prune what a spokesperson later categorized as “coordinated spam,” the execution triggered a tidal wave of digital civil disobedience. Instead of silencing the critics, the automated system provided a focal point for them, validating the sentiment that the tech giant was more interested in brand preservation than addressing the technical grievances that birthed the nickname.
Analyzing the root of this frustration reveals that the term “slop” is often an emotional reaction to a very real technical burden placed on the developer community. For instance, attempting to upgrade a SharePoint Framework (SPFx) project from version 1.14.x to the recently released 1.22.x is frequently described by those in the trenches as a “blood bath” of error messages and cryptic warnings. The transition is not merely a version bump; it is an overhaul of the build toolchain that often leaves developers debugging deep-seated errors that appear to stem from AI-generated or “slop-induced” bugs within M365 and community plug-ins. When a developer spends three days chasing an error only to find it buried in a low-quality, automated code suggestion or a poorly integrated community tool, the “Microslop” label stops being a joke and starts being an accurate description of a broken workflow. This disconnect between Microsoft’s “AI-first” marketing and the gritty, error-prone reality of its development frameworks is precisely why a simple keyword filter was never going to be enough to contain the community’s mounting resentment.
The Streisand Effect: How Censorship Becomes a Signal
The failure of the “Microslop” ban is a textbook example of how heavy-handed moderation can amplify the very information it seeks to suppress. In the context of AI builders, this incident highlights the danger of using automated tools to sanitize discourse, as it inadvertently creates a “badge of resistance” for the user base. Every bypassed filter and every subsequent ban on the Copilot Discord became a signal to the broader industry that there was a significant rift between Microsoft’s narrative of AI “sophistication” and the community’s lived experience with the product. Furthermore, by escalating from keyword filtering to a full server lockdown, Microsoft effectively confirmed the power of the “Microslop” label. This elevated the term from a minor annoyance to a headline-grabbing symbol of corporate insecurity, demonstrating that the more a corporation tries to hide a piece of information, the more the public will seek it out and amplify it.
This phenomenon is particularly dangerous for AI-centric companies because the technology itself is already under intense scrutiny for its reliability and ethical implications. If a builder cannot manage a community hub without resorting to blunt-force censorship, it raises uncomfortable questions about how they manage the more complex, nuanced guardrails required for the Large Language Models (LLMs) themselves. The internet rarely leaves such attempts at suppression unpunished; in this case, the ban led to the creation of browser extensions and scripts specifically designed to spread the nickname across the web. This demonstrates that in 2026, community management is no longer just an administrative task; it is a critical component of brand integrity that requires a much more sophisticated approach than a simple “find and replace” blocklist. Builders must recognize that transparency is the only effective dampener for the Streisand Effect, as any attempt to use automation to hide dissatisfaction only serves to validate the critics.
Why the “Slop” Narrative Resonates: The Technical Quality Gap
At the heart of the “Microslop” controversy lies a deeper, more substantive issue regarding the growing perception that AI integration has entered a period of diminishing returns, often referred to as the “slop” era. The term “slop” gained significant cultural weight after major linguistic authorities and industry analysts began using it to specifically define the flood of low-quality, mass-produced AI content clogging the modern internet. When users apply this term to a tech giant, they are not merely engaging in schoolyard insults; they are expressing a technical frustration with the way generative AI features have been integrated into a legacy operating system. Analyzing the user feedback leading up to the Discord lockdown reveals a clear pattern of “quantity over quality” in the deployment of Copilot. Developers and power users have documented numerous instances where AI components were perceived as being forced into core OS functions like Notepad, File Explorer, and Task Manager, often at the expense of system latency and overall stability.
This quality gap is precisely what gave the “Microslop” nickname its viral potency, as it hit upon a verifiable truth regarding the current state of the software. If the AI integration were universally recognized as seamless, high-value, and technically flawless, the derogatory label would have failed to gain traction among the engineering community. However, because the term captured a widespread sentiment that the software was becoming bloated with unrefined, “sloppy” code that prioritizes corporate AI metrics over actual user utility, the attempt to ban the word felt like an attempt to ban the truth itself. For AI builders, this serves as a critical warning that one cannot moderate their way out of a fundamental quality problem. If a community begins to categorize a product’s output as “slop,” the correct response is not to update the server’s AutoMod settings to include the word on a prohibited list; the solution is to re-evaluate the product roadmap and address the technical regressions causing the friction.
Root Cause Analysis: The Failure of Brittle Automation in Community Governance
The technical root cause of the Discord meltdown can be traced back to the implementation of “naive” or “brittle” automation—a common pitfall for organizations that treat community management as a purely administrative task. Microsoft’s moderation team relied on a basic fixed-string match filter, which is the mos
Furthermore, the automation failed to account for context, which is the most vital component of any successful moderation strategy. The bot reportedly flagged every instance of the word “Microslop,” regardless of whether the user was using it as an insult, asking a question about the controversy, or providing constructive criticism. By labeling a corporate nickname with the same “inappropriate” tag usually reserved for hate speech or harassment, the automated system actively insulted the intelligence of the user base. This lack of nuance in the AI-driven moderation stack created a pressure cooker environment where every automated deletion was viewed as an act of corporate censorship. For AI builders, the lesson is that any automation deployed for community governance must be as sophisticated as the product it supports. Relying on 1990s-era keyword filtering to manage a 2026-era AI community is a recipe for disaster, as it signals a lack of technical effort that only further reinforces the “slop” narrative the organization is trying to escape.
The Strategic Shift: Moving Beyond Blunt Force Suppression
The failure of the “Microslop” ban highlights a critical strategic inflection point for AI builders who must navigate the increasingly volatile waters of developer communities. Relying on blunt-force suppression as a first-line defense against product criticism is a strategy rooted in legacy corporate communication models that are incompatible with the transparent, decentralized nature of modern technical hubs. When a tech giant attempts to scrub a derogatory term from its digital ecosystem, it effectively abdicates its role as a collaborator and assumes the role of an adversary. This shift in posture is particularly damaging in the context of generative AI, where the success of a platform like Copilot is heavily dependent on the feedback loops and integrations created by the very developers who feel alienated by such heavy-handed moderation. Instead of viewing these “slop” accusations as a nuisance to be silenced, sophisticated AI organizations should view them as high-fidelity data points indicating where the gap between marketing hype and functional utility has become too wide to ignore.
Consequently, the move toward resilient community management requires a transition from “policing” to “pivoting.” Analyzing the fallout from the March 2026 lockdown reveals that the most effective way to neutralize a pejorative nickname is to address the technical deficiencies that gave the name its power. For instance, if users are labeling an AI integration as “slop” due to high latency, resource bloat, or inconsistent output, the strategic response should involve a public-facing commitment to performance benchmarks and a transparent roadmap for optimization. By engaging with the substance of the criticism rather than the semantics of the label, a builder can naturally erode the legitimacy of the mockery. Microsoft’s decision to hide behind a locked Discord server suggests a lack of preparedness for the “friction” that inevitably accompanies the rollout of transformative technologies. To avoid this pitfall, builders must ensure that their community teams are empowered with technical context and the authority to translate community outrage into actionable product requirements, rather than being relegated to the role of digital janitors tasked with sweeping dissent under the rug.
Building Resilience: Lessons in Context-Aware Governance
For AI startups and established enterprises alike, the “Microslop” debacle provides a definitive masterclass in the necessity of context-aware governance. The primary technical takeaway is that community moderation in 2026 must be as intellectually rigorous as the models being developed. A sophisticated governance stack would utilize sentiment analysis and intent recognition to differentiate between a user engaging in harassment and a user expressing a legitimate, albeit sarcastically phrased, grievance. By failing to integrate these more nuanced AI capabilities into their own moderation tools, Microsoft inadvertently signaled a lack of confidence in the very technology they are asking the world to adopt. If an AI leader cannot trust its own systems to handle a Discord meme without resorting to a total server blackout, it becomes significantly harder to convince enterprise clients that the same technology is ready to handle mission-critical business logic or sensitive customer interactions.
Furthermore, building a resilient community requires a fundamental acceptance of the “ugly” side of product development. In the age of social media and rapid-fire developer feedback, mistakes will be memed, and failures will be christened with catchy, derogatory nicknames. Attempting to legislate these memes out of existence is a losing battle that only serves to accelerate the Streisand Effect. Instead, AI builders should focus on creating “high-trust environments” where users feel that their feedback—no matter how unpolished or “sloppy” it may be—is being ingested as a valuable resource. This involves maintaining open channels even during a PR crisis and resisting the urge to implement “emergency” filters that treat your most vocal users like hostile actors. By prioritizing stability, transparency, and technical excellence over brand hygiene, organizations can transform a potential “Microslop” moment into a demonstration of corporate maturity and a commitment to long-term product quality.
From Damage Control to Product Discipline: Reclaiming the Narrative
The ultimate fallout of the Microsoft Discord lockdown serves as a definitive case study in why AI builders must prioritize technical discipline over narrative control. When a corporation attempts to “engineer” a community’s vocabulary through restrictive automation, it inadvertently signals a lack of confidence in the underlying product’s ability to speak for itself. Analyzing the broader industry trends of 2026, it becomes clear that the “slop” label is not merely a social media trend but a technical critique of the current state of LLM integration. For a developer audience, the transition from “Microsoft” to “Microslop” in common parlance was a direct reaction to perceived regressions in software performance and the intrusion of non-essential AI telemetry into stable workflows. By focusing on the removal of the word rather than the remediation of the code, Microsoft missed a critical opportunity to demonstrate the “sophistication” that CEO Satya Nadella has publicly championed. Builders must realize that in a highly literate technical ecosystem, the only way to effectively kill a derogatory meme is to make it irrelevant through superior engineering and undeniable user value.
Furthermore, the “Microslop” incident underscores the necessity of a unified strategy between product engineering and community management. In many large-scale tech organizations, these departments operate in silos, leading to situations where a community manager implements a blunt-force keyword filter without realizing it contradicts the broader corporate message of AI-driven nuance and intelligence. This strategic misalignment is what allowed a minor moderation decision to balloon into a global PR crisis that dominated tech headlines for a week. To build a resilient AI brand, organizations must ensure that their automated governance tools are reflective of their core technological promises. If your product is marketed as an “intelligent companion,” your moderation bot cannot behave like a primitive 1990s-era blacklist. Moving forward, the industry must adopt a “feedback-first” architecture where automated tools are used to categorize and elevate user frustration to engineering teams, rather than acting as a digital firewall designed to protect executive sensibilities from the harsh reality of user sentiment.
Conclusion: The Lasting Legacy of the “Slop” Era
The March 2026 Discord lockdown will likely be remembered as the moment “Microslop” transitioned from a niche joke to a permanent fixture of the AI era’s vocabulary. Microsoft’s attempt to use automated moderation as a shield against criticism backfired because it ignored the fundamental law of the digital age: the more you try to hide a grievance, the more you validate its existence. For those of us building in the AI space, the lessons are clear and uncompromising. We must build with transparency, moderate with context, and never mistake a blunt-force keyword filter for a comprehensive community strategy. If we want our products to be associated with innovation rather than “slop,” we must earn that reputation through technical excellence and genuine engagement, not through the silent deletion of our critics’ messages. In the end, Microsoft didn’t just ban a word; they inadvertently launched a movement, proving that even the world’s most powerful tech companies remain vulnerable to the power of a well-timed, nine-letter meme and the undeniable force of the Streisand Effect.
Call to Action
If this breakdown helped you think a little clearer about the threats out there, don’t just click away. Subscribe for more no-nonsense security insights, drop a comment with your thoughts or questions, or reach out if there’s a topic you want me to tackle next. Stay sharp out there.
D. Bryan King
Sources
- PCMag: Microsoft Effort to Ban ‘Microslop’ on Copilot Discord Didn’t Go As Planned
- Windows Latest: Microsoft Locks Copilot Discord After Moderation Backlash
- Futurism: Microsoft Bans “Microslop” on Discord, Gets So Humiliated It Locks Server
- Gizmodo: Microsoft Bans Term ‘Microslop’ From Official Discord Server
- PC Gamer: Microsoft banned the word ‘Microslop’ in its Copilot Discord server
- It’s FOSS: Microsoft Locks Down Discord Server Over “Microslop” Posts
- Slashdot: Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ On Its Discord, Then Locks the Server
- Ground News: Microsoft Locks Down Discord Server After Microslop Ban Backfires
- Mysterium VPN: Microsoft Banned “Microslop” on Discord, Then Panicked
- Kotaku: Flood Of ‘Microslop’ Messages Forces Microsoft’s Official Copilot AI Discord Into Lockdown
- WinBuzzer: Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ on Discord, Locks Server After Backlash
- NIST: AI Risk Management Framework
- CISA: Secure by Design Principles for AI
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.
Related Posts
Rate this:
#AIBuilders #AIDisruption #AIEthics #AIFeedbackLoops #AIHallucinations #AIInfrastructure #AIIntegration #AIMarketPerception #AIProductStrategy #AIReliability #AISecurity #AISlop #AISophistication #AITransparency #AutomatedModeration #BrandIntegrity #BuildToolchain #codeQuality #CommunityManagement #CommunityModeration #ContextAwareModeration #Copilot #CorporateCensorship #developerExperience #DeveloperFriction #DeveloperRelations #DigitalCivilDisobedience #DiscordBan #DiscordLockdown #enterpriseAI #FeatureCreep #generativeAI #Ghostwriting #GulpToHeft #KeywordFiltering #LLMGuardrails #M365Plugins #Microslop #Microsoft #Microsoft365 #MicrosoftRecall #OpenSourceCommunity #ProductManagement #SatyaNadella #SentimentAnalysis #SharePointFramework122 #SoftwareBloat #SoftwareLifecycle #SoftwareQuality #SPFx114 #SPFxUpgrade #StreisandEffect #TechIndustryTrends2026 #TechPRFailure #TechnicalBlogging #technicalDebt #userPrivacy #UserTrust #Windows11AI -
Microsoft’s “Microslop” Discord Ban Backfires: What AI Builders Can Learn from This Epic Moderation Fail
2,644 words, 14 minutes read time.
The “Microslop” Catalyst: When Automated Moderation Becomes a PR Liability
The recent escalation on Microsoft’s official Copilot Discord server serves as a stark reminder that in the high-stakes world of generative AI, the community’s perception of quality is as vital as the underlying architecture itself. In early March 2026, what began as a routine effort to maintain decorum within a product-support hub rapidly spiraled into a live case study of the Streisand Effect. Reports from multiple industry outlets confirmed that Microsoft had implemented a blunt, automated keyword filter designed to silently delete any message containing the term “Microslop.” This derogatory portmanteau has been increasingly used by developers and power users to describe what they perceive as low-quality, intrusive, or “sloppy” AI integrations within the Windows ecosystem. While the corporate intent was likely to prune what a spokesperson later categorized as “coordinated spam,” the execution triggered a tidal wave of digital civil disobedience. Instead of silencing the critics, the automated system provided a focal point for them, validating the sentiment that the tech giant was more interested in brand preservation than addressing the technical grievances that birthed the nickname.
Analyzing the root of this frustration reveals that the term “slop” is often an emotional reaction to a very real technical burden placed on the developer community. For instance, attempting to upgrade a SharePoint Framework (SPFx) project from version 1.14.x to the recently released 1.22.x is frequently described by those in the trenches as a “blood bath” of error messages and cryptic warnings. The transition is not merely a version bump; it is an overhaul of the build toolchain that often leaves developers debugging deep-seated errors that appear to stem from AI-generated or “slop-induced” bugs within M365 and community plug-ins. When a developer spends three days chasing an error only to find it buried in a low-quality, automated code suggestion or a poorly integrated community tool, the “Microslop” label stops being a joke and starts being an accurate description of a broken workflow. This disconnect between Microsoft’s “AI-first” marketing and the gritty, error-prone reality of its development frameworks is precisely why a simple keyword filter was never going to be enough to contain the community’s mounting resentment.
The Streisand Effect: How Censorship Becomes a Signal
The failure of the “Microslop” ban is a textbook example of how heavy-handed moderation can amplify the very information it seeks to suppress. In the context of AI builders, this incident highlights the danger of using automated tools to sanitize discourse, as it inadvertently creates a “badge of resistance” for the user base. Every bypassed filter and every subsequent ban on the Copilot Discord became a signal to the broader industry that there was a significant rift between Microsoft’s narrative of AI “sophistication” and the community’s lived experience with the product. Furthermore, by escalating from keyword filtering to a full server lockdown, Microsoft effectively confirmed the power of the “Microslop” label. This elevated the term from a minor annoyance to a headline-grabbing symbol of corporate insecurity, demonstrating that the more a corporation tries to hide a piece of information, the more the public will seek it out and amplify it.
This phenomenon is particularly dangerous for AI-centric companies because the technology itself is already under intense scrutiny for its reliability and ethical implications. If a builder cannot manage a community hub without resorting to blunt-force censorship, it raises uncomfortable questions about how they manage the more complex, nuanced guardrails required for the Large Language Models (LLMs) themselves. The internet rarely leaves such attempts at suppression unpunished; in this case, the ban led to the creation of browser extensions and scripts specifically designed to spread the nickname across the web. This demonstrates that in 2026, community management is no longer just an administrative task; it is a critical component of brand integrity that requires a much more sophisticated approach than a simple “find and replace” blocklist. Builders must recognize that transparency is the only effective dampener for the Streisand Effect, as any attempt to use automation to hide dissatisfaction only serves to validate the critics.
Why the “Slop” Narrative Resonates: The Technical Quality Gap
At the heart of the “Microslop” controversy lies a deeper, more substantive issue regarding the growing perception that AI integration has entered a period of diminishing returns, often referred to as the “slop” era. The term “slop” gained significant cultural weight after major linguistic authorities and industry analysts began using it to specifically define the flood of low-quality, mass-produced AI content clogging the modern internet. When users apply this term to a tech giant, they are not merely engaging in schoolyard insults; they are expressing a technical frustration with the way generative AI features have been integrated into a legacy operating system. Analyzing the user feedback leading up to the Discord lockdown reveals a clear pattern of “quantity over quality” in the deployment of Copilot. Developers and power users have documented numerous instances where AI components were perceived as being forced into core OS functions like Notepad, File Explorer, and Task Manager, often at the expense of system latency and overall stability.
This quality gap is precisely what gave the “Microslop” nickname its viral potency, as it hit upon a verifiable truth regarding the current state of the software. If the AI integration were universally recognized as seamless, high-value, and technically flawless, the derogatory label would have failed to gain traction among the engineering community. However, because the term captured a widespread sentiment that the software was becoming bloated with unrefined, “sloppy” code that prioritizes corporate AI metrics over actual user utility, the attempt to ban the word felt like an attempt to ban the truth itself. For AI builders, this serves as a critical warning that one cannot moderate their way out of a fundamental quality problem. If a community begins to categorize a product’s output as “slop,” the correct response is not to update the server’s AutoMod settings to include the word on a prohibited list; the solution is to re-evaluate the product roadmap and address the technical regressions causing the friction.
Root Cause Analysis: The Failure of Brittle Automation in Community Governance
The technical root cause of the Discord meltdown can be traced back to the implementation of “naive” or “brittle” automation—a common pitfall for organizations that treat community management as a purely administrative task. Microsoft’s moderation team relied on a basic fixed-string match filter, which is the mos
Furthermore, the automation failed to account for context, which is the most vital component of any successful moderation strategy. The bot reportedly flagged every instance of the word “Microslop,” regardless of whether the user was using it as an insult, asking a question about the controversy, or providing constructive criticism. By labeling a corporate nickname with the same “inappropriate” tag usually reserved for hate speech or harassment, the automated system actively insulted the intelligence of the user base. This lack of nuance in the AI-driven moderation stack created a pressure cooker environment where every automated deletion was viewed as an act of corporate censorship. For AI builders, the lesson is that any automation deployed for community governance must be as sophisticated as the product it supports. Relying on 1990s-era keyword filtering to manage a 2026-era AI community is a recipe for disaster, as it signals a lack of technical effort that only further reinforces the “slop” narrative the organization is trying to escape.
The Strategic Shift: Moving Beyond Blunt Force Suppression
The failure of the “Microslop” ban highlights a critical strategic inflection point for AI builders who must navigate the increasingly volatile waters of developer communities. Relying on blunt-force suppression as a first-line defense against product criticism is a strategy rooted in legacy corporate communication models that are incompatible with the transparent, decentralized nature of modern technical hubs. When a tech giant attempts to scrub a derogatory term from its digital ecosystem, it effectively abdicates its role as a collaborator and assumes the role of an adversary. This shift in posture is particularly damaging in the context of generative AI, where the success of a platform like Copilot is heavily dependent on the feedback loops and integrations created by the very developers who feel alienated by such heavy-handed moderation. Instead of viewing these “slop” accusations as a nuisance to be silenced, sophisticated AI organizations should view them as high-fidelity data points indicating where the gap between marketing hype and functional utility has become too wide to ignore.
Consequently, the move toward resilient community management requires a transition from “policing” to “pivoting.” Analyzing the fallout from the March 2026 lockdown reveals that the most effective way to neutralize a pejorative nickname is to address the technical deficiencies that gave the name its power. For instance, if users are labeling an AI integration as “slop” due to high latency, resource bloat, or inconsistent output, the strategic response should involve a public-facing commitment to performance benchmarks and a transparent roadmap for optimization. By engaging with the substance of the criticism rather than the semantics of the label, a builder can naturally erode the legitimacy of the mockery. Microsoft’s decision to hide behind a locked Discord server suggests a lack of preparedness for the “friction” that inevitably accompanies the rollout of transformative technologies. To avoid this pitfall, builders must ensure that their community teams are empowered with technical context and the authority to translate community outrage into actionable product requirements, rather than being relegated to the role of digital janitors tasked with sweeping dissent under the rug.
Building Resilience: Lessons in Context-Aware Governance
For AI startups and established enterprises alike, the “Microslop” debacle provides a definitive masterclass in the necessity of context-aware governance. The primary technical takeaway is that community moderation in 2026 must be as intellectually rigorous as the models being developed. A sophisticated governance stack would utilize sentiment analysis and intent recognition to differentiate between a user engaging in harassment and a user expressing a legitimate, albeit sarcastically phrased, grievance. By failing to integrate these more nuanced AI capabilities into their own moderation tools, Microsoft inadvertently signaled a lack of confidence in the very technology they are asking the world to adopt. If an AI leader cannot trust its own systems to handle a Discord meme without resorting to a total server blackout, it becomes significantly harder to convince enterprise clients that the same technology is ready to handle mission-critical business logic or sensitive customer interactions.
Furthermore, building a resilient community requires a fundamental acceptance of the “ugly” side of product development. In the age of social media and rapid-fire developer feedback, mistakes will be memed, and failures will be christened with catchy, derogatory nicknames. Attempting to legislate these memes out of existence is a losing battle that only serves to accelerate the Streisand Effect. Instead, AI builders should focus on creating “high-trust environments” where users feel that their feedback—no matter how unpolished or “sloppy” it may be—is being ingested as a valuable resource. This involves maintaining open channels even during a PR crisis and resisting the urge to implement “emergency” filters that treat your most vocal users like hostile actors. By prioritizing stability, transparency, and technical excellence over brand hygiene, organizations can transform a potential “Microslop” moment into a demonstration of corporate maturity and a commitment to long-term product quality.
From Damage Control to Product Discipline: Reclaiming the Narrative
The ultimate fallout of the Microsoft Discord lockdown serves as a definitive case study in why AI builders must prioritize technical discipline over narrative control. When a corporation attempts to “engineer” a community’s vocabulary through restrictive automation, it inadvertently signals a lack of confidence in the underlying product’s ability to speak for itself. Analyzing the broader industry trends of 2026, it becomes clear that the “slop” label is not merely a social media trend but a technical critique of the current state of LLM integration. For a developer audience, the transition from “Microsoft” to “Microslop” in common parlance was a direct reaction to perceived regressions in software performance and the intrusion of non-essential AI telemetry into stable workflows. By focusing on the removal of the word rather than the remediation of the code, Microsoft missed a critical opportunity to demonstrate the “sophistication” that CEO Satya Nadella has publicly championed. Builders must realize that in a highly literate technical ecosystem, the only way to effectively kill a derogatory meme is to make it irrelevant through superior engineering and undeniable user value.
Furthermore, the “Microslop” incident underscores the necessity of a unified strategy between product engineering and community management. In many large-scale tech organizations, these departments operate in silos, leading to situations where a community manager implements a blunt-force keyword filter without realizing it contradicts the broader corporate message of AI-driven nuance and intelligence. This strategic misalignment is what allowed a minor moderation decision to balloon into a global PR crisis that dominated tech headlines for a week. To build a resilient AI brand, organizations must ensure that their automated governance tools are reflective of their core technological promises. If your product is marketed as an “intelligent companion,” your moderation bot cannot behave like a primitive 1990s-era blacklist. Moving forward, the industry must adopt a “feedback-first” architecture where automated tools are used to categorize and elevate user frustration to engineering teams, rather than acting as a digital firewall designed to protect executive sensibilities from the harsh reality of user sentiment.
Conclusion: The Lasting Legacy of the “Slop” Era
The March 2026 Discord lockdown will likely be remembered as the moment “Microslop” transitioned from a niche joke to a permanent fixture of the AI era’s vocabulary. Microsoft’s attempt to use automated moderation as a shield against criticism backfired because it ignored the fundamental law of the digital age: the more you try to hide a grievance, the more you validate its existence. For those of us building in the AI space, the lessons are clear and uncompromising. We must build with transparency, moderate with context, and never mistake a blunt-force keyword filter for a comprehensive community strategy. If we want our products to be associated with innovation rather than “slop,” we must earn that reputation through technical excellence and genuine engagement, not through the silent deletion of our critics’ messages. In the end, Microsoft didn’t just ban a word; they inadvertently launched a movement, proving that even the world’s most powerful tech companies remain vulnerable to the power of a well-timed, nine-letter meme and the undeniable force of the Streisand Effect.
Call to Action
If this breakdown helped you think a little clearer about the threats out there, don’t just click away. Subscribe for more no-nonsense security insights, drop a comment with your thoughts or questions, or reach out if there’s a topic you want me to tackle next. Stay sharp out there.
D. Bryan King
Sources
- PCMag: Microsoft Effort to Ban ‘Microslop’ on Copilot Discord Didn’t Go As Planned
- Windows Latest: Microsoft Locks Copilot Discord After Moderation Backlash
- Futurism: Microsoft Bans “Microslop” on Discord, Gets So Humiliated It Locks Server
- Gizmodo: Microsoft Bans Term ‘Microslop’ From Official Discord Server
- PC Gamer: Microsoft banned the word ‘Microslop’ in its Copilot Discord server
- It’s FOSS: Microsoft Locks Down Discord Server Over “Microslop” Posts
- Slashdot: Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ On Its Discord, Then Locks the Server
- Ground News: Microsoft Locks Down Discord Server After Microslop Ban Backfires
- Mysterium VPN: Microsoft Banned “Microslop” on Discord, Then Panicked
- Kotaku: Flood Of ‘Microslop’ Messages Forces Microsoft’s Official Copilot AI Discord Into Lockdown
- WinBuzzer: Microsoft Bans ‘Microslop’ on Discord, Locks Server After Backlash
- NIST: AI Risk Management Framework
- CISA: Secure by Design Principles for AI
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.
Related Posts
Rate this:
#AIBuilders #AIDisruption #AIEthics #AIFeedbackLoops #AIHallucinations #AIInfrastructure #AIIntegration #AIMarketPerception #AIProductStrategy #AIReliability #AISecurity #AISlop #AISophistication #AITransparency #AutomatedModeration #BrandIntegrity #BuildToolchain #codeQuality #CommunityManagement #CommunityModeration #ContextAwareModeration #Copilot #CorporateCensorship #developerExperience #DeveloperFriction #DeveloperRelations #DigitalCivilDisobedience #DiscordBan #DiscordLockdown #enterpriseAI #FeatureCreep #generativeAI #Ghostwriting #GulpToHeft #KeywordFiltering #LLMGuardrails #M365Plugins #Microslop #Microsoft #Microsoft365 #MicrosoftRecall #OpenSourceCommunity #ProductManagement #SatyaNadella #SentimentAnalysis #SharePointFramework122 #SoftwareBloat #SoftwareLifecycle #SoftwareQuality #SPFx114 #SPFxUpgrade #StreisandEffect #TechIndustryTrends2026 #TechPRFailure #TechnicalBlogging #technicalDebt #userPrivacy #UserTrust #Windows11AI -
Kenstrosity’s Top Ten(ish) of 2024
By Kenstrosity
When I think back on this year, a year of unprecedented stress and struggle for this sponge, one predominant emotion rises above the rest. Gratitude. I went through hardships I couldn’t possibly have anticipated; watched as harrowing events, both global and domestic, rocked our world; and trudged through time-dilating frights that I only previously experienced in some of my worst nightmares. And yet, I persist! I found myself asking, once again, why I was spared a worse fate where others weren’t? What have I done in life to deserve the good fortune I’ve received? In time I’ve come to believe that understanding the why of it all isn’t always the most important part. In some ways, the pursuit of an answer to “why” even blinds us to more enriching lessons we can learn from the experiences we share, both mundane and extraordinary. These things teach us how to be human, how to grow, how to thrive, and how to come together as a community. So, for what must be the first time of my life, I stopped asking why anything happened, as tempting as that spiral always looked from outside. Instead, I spent all of my energy prioritizing the moment, experiencing it, allowing it to change me and mold me, and to be present in it not just for me, but for my friends, my family, and my neighbors.
Back to gratitude. More so this year than any other, I must express my deepest, most heartfelt gratitude for damn near everyone. When my roommate and I lost everything overnight, I felt completely and utterly overwhelmed by the response. Hands of friends, family, and community reached towards us, open to do whatever they could to help us up. AMG Himself, Steel Druhm, Sentynel, GardensTale, Twelve, Dolphin Whisperer, Maddog, Holdeneye, Cherd of Doom, Grymm, El Cuervo, Dr. Wvrm, Ferrous Beuller, Saunders, Eldritch Elitist, Doom_et_Al, Dear Hollow, Carcharodon, Felgund, Ferox, Thus Spoke, Iceberg, Mystikus Hugebeard, Itchy, the n00bs, a shit ton of Discord frens, all of my meatspace friends, Mom, Dad, my sister, some of my extended family, my work colleagues and acquaintances, random kind strangers, even Dr. A. N. Grier went above and beyond to help directly with our recovery. Every single member of staff here did whatever they could to give some relief, far beyond what I could’ve ever asked for, and it overwhelms my little heart to know they cared that deeply. My owlpal and great friend Rolderathis, writer and editor at Toilet ov Hell, unexpectedly swooped in via Discord to jump start our financial recovery by creating a crowdsourcing page for us—even as the admin for AMG planned to do the same. Instrumental to its dissemination and subsequent explosion,1 both AMG Himself and Steel Druhm made sure to aggressively spread the word via an official post on this very site, and in their own circles public and private. Friends and family did the same, to great effect. Toilet ov Hell even posted their own article, too, and I don’t even fucking write there. Incredible. My aunt and her husband helped us replace two full rooms worth of furniture without hesitation, and another close friend of mine provided yet another room’s worth on top of that. Our friends reached far and wide to find opportunities to get us shelter, food, essential items, and vital emotional support. FEMA did more than their part for us as well, and they continue to help us as we navigate the next stages of long-term recovery. My therapist stuck with me through the storm, helped carry me through some concerning emotional blockages shortly after, and continues to guide me now. The continuous waves of support and outreach blew me away, and motivated me to pay it forward in whatever way I was capable for those who were going through hell with us. I thank you all, from the bottom of my heart.
As if a hurricane wasn’t enough to bear, Mom was diagnosed with lung cancer just ten days after the storm hit. Still, there shined small silver linings that kept me going. It was caught very early, and she has already returned home after a resoundingly successful surgery, where they removed the tumor in block.2 As scary as the thought of losing my Mom right after everything else that’s happened was, I choose to emphasize the excellent treatment and attention to detail that allowed Mom to come home quickly and in decent health, all things considered. I choose to be with my family, to live in this moment through the pain, the fear, the uncertainty, so I can be there when the sun inevitably shines again, too. I want to extend a very special thanks to Dad, who remained constantly by Mom’s side and supported her through every stage of this development when I wasn’t able.
All of this merely scratches the surface of everything we’ve gone through in 2024. But we are still here!3 We are living the best we can, helping each other to survive, and perhaps soon to also thrive again. The sense of community I feel not just for my deeply wounded city, but also the people in my life, deepened significantly just in the last few months. These experiences have changed me, changed my outlook on life and on relationships. The fragility of life and the sheer power of the love that comes from the people in it sharpen my understanding of what’s really important. Life is about the people you have, the way you treat them, and how you conduct yourself in this world to try to improve it with your unique light, little by little. It’s about supporting your loved ones as they go through good times just as fiercely as when they go through hardship and change. It’s about growing every day into the very best version of yourself, and being there to witness and celebrate the same journey in those close to you. I understand that more today than ever before, and I am thankful that this lesson, above all else, is my takeaway from 2024.
It’s going to be a while before we can return home to AVL, but I’ve already returned full force to my home away from home, Angry Metal Guy! I’d like to thank Steel Druhm and AMG Himself again for keeping my spot warm for me and for being excellent taskmasters and blogrunners, to Sentynel for keeping things running smoothly on the back end and for being awesome in general at his job, to all the writers for continuously providing the internet with the best worst opinions on metal extant, and to Dr. A. N. Grier for deleting everything I’ve ever written so that nobody has to suffer my silly goofy ramblings.
With that said, everybody should probably snapshot this little Top Ten(ish) of mine before Grier deletes that, too. It looks mighty different to how it would’ve had the storm not happened, both because I couldn’t listen to any new music for a while and because the event itself ushered a sharp shift in my listening preferences. Regardless, I’m happy with my selections, and I fully expect the rest of you to rabble at my confounding omissions.4 Let it commence!
#ish. Elvellon // Ascending in Synergy – Elvellon holds a special place in my heart, and thanks to masterful songsmithing, Ascending in Synergy holds a well-deserved placement on my list. I simply haven’t been able to stop jamming it all year. Ascending in Synergy is everything I loved about metal when I first got into it, and it embodies much of what I love about metal today. It never hurts that the first eight songs are all megaton bangers. This record would have placed nearer the top if it weren’t for the monologue in the penultimate epic. Nonetheless, I love Ascending in Synergy.
#10. Madder Mortem // Old Eyes, New Heart – Ever since Marrow, Madder Mortem successfully won me over where every other album in their back catalog failed to resonate. I can’t explain what exactly it was that captured my adoration all of a sudden, but Old Eyes, New Heart has my heart just as Marrow did before it. Smart compositions, earnest delivery, crystalline lyrics, lush sound, this record has it all. I’d be a fool not to award it placement on this list.
#9. Oceans of Slumber // Where Gods Fear to Speak – Oceans of Slumber carved out an ever-evolving, fearlessly creative, and unique sound for themselves since their inception, but always seemed somewhat inconsistent with the quality of their songwriting. Not so on their magnum opus Where Gods Fear to Speak. Immense, cohesive, and richly layered with detail and compelling songwriting, Where Gods Fear to Speak feels like the culmination of their entire career, fully matured and refined to peak form.
#8. Sunburst // Manifesto – There was a point in time that I was confident Manifesto would top this list. That was largely due to sheer excitement that a new Sunburst album, which I never thought I would see in the first place, actually turned out to be great. Rich compositions, sharp hooks, and a masterful performance from everyone involved, Manifesto solidifies Sunburst as one of the best bands out of the Greek power metal scene. I just hope that I don’t have to wait another eight years for the next one!
#7. Scumbag // Homicide Cult – This record is simply unfair. I had my Top 10 all sorted out, and then some bottle-nosed bastard with a dorsal fin and a propensity for beating up smaller mammals on the wrong side of the sea had me check this out, with the promise of killer riffs by the main Noxis guitarist. That bastard was right, this record absolutely rips. There are so many unbelievably filthy, stank-face inducing riffs on Homicide Cult that I had to get plastic surgery to look like myself again. Otherwise, I’d look more like my rotted-out friend on the cover.
#6. Noxis // Violence Inherent in the System – Death metal this good hits me in a special place. While embodying all of the skullcrushing ways of olde, Violence Inherent in the System represents one of the most creative, smart, and well-produced records in modern death metal currently. And while my review helped spike the hype, it still feels a bit like Noxis are running further under the radar than they deserve. Coming out of absolute nowhere and dropping the best straight-up death metal of the year? Unreal.
#5. Feind // Ambulante Hirnamputation – Grind, and all of its hybrids, never once made it on my proper Top 10. I’ve written here for six years. That’s how powerful Feind’s Ambulante Hirnamputation truly is. Immense fun, more quality riffs stuffed into less than twenty minutes than some of the best records can fit into an hour, and cheeky to boot, Ambulante Hirnamputation proves that Feind mastered the grindset. Let’s hope this isn’t the last I get to hear of Feind.
#4. Brodequin // Harbinger of Woe – In contrast to grind, I almost always have a brutal death metal record on my Top 10. It’s a style that resonates with me very easily, and there’s never a shortage of it for my personal enjoyment. Brodequin won the day in a year chock full of great options, with the immensely accessible Harbinger of Woe. The sheer level of groove brimming from this torture chamber sends my booty into overdrive, and the thick, nasty production only serves to enhance the entire experience. There’s very little else I could ask for to sate my brutal death cravings.
#3. Iotunn // Kinship – It’s been a banner year for our friend Jon Aldará. Where Iotunn’s Access All Worlds interested, but did not woo, me, follow-up Kinship absolutely rocked my socks. Every single track is a celebration of epic, melodic, and deeply immersive extreme metal. Gorgeous compositions, ascendant guitar work, ridiculous replay value, and stellar vocals propelled Kinship way up on my list of favorite records at a blistering pace, leaving me revelling in an idyllic honeymoon period. Even after investing more time marinating in its wondrous environs, I’ve only fallen deeper and deeper in love with it. I just can’t imagine how Iotunn are going to top this.
#2. Replicant // Infinite Mortality – This is the year for records that floored me where their predecessors didn’t. Replicant’s Malignant Reality was enjoyable, but couldn’t touch my Top 10 in its year. Infinite Mortality, on the other hand, made a valiant bid for Album o’ the Year from the very first riff kicking “Acid Mirror” into the stratosphere. Hardcore-tinged technical death metal for fans of the discordant and the unorthodox, Infinite Mortality is supremely memorable not just for its sound, but for its infallible, hook-laden construction. Infinite Mortality may not be the only record of its kind released this year, but it’s without a doubt the greatest.
#1. Myrath // Karma – Hurricane Helene took my home. It changed the ecology, geology, and pedology of the entire Asheville region, likely for all time. But one thing it couldn’t take from me is my spirit, my drive to survive, and my determination to thrive. Even during a long period where access to music was a rare luxury, Karma remained at the forefront of my mind. It held me from giving up and reminded me of the strength that burgeoned not just in myself, but also in my friends, family, and greater community as we rebuilt our lives together. If there was ever a record released this year that embodies that spirit of triumph over adversity, it’s Myrath’s incredible Karma. It was always going to be high on this list, thanks to its insanely memorable songwriting and passionate performances of univerally great songs. However, it wasn’t until I personally resonated with its empowering message in the context of a devastating natural disaster that I knew this would be, unquestionably, my Album o’ the Year.
Honorable Mentions
- Amiensus // Reclamation Pt. II – Thoughtful, dynamic, and immersive, Reclamation Pt. II represents the pinnacle of what I like in progressive black metal.
- The Flaying // Ni dieu ni maître – Unsung melodic death metal heroes The Flaying offer up nonstop hooks and a crazy bass performance delivered at a feral pace.
- Hamferð // Men Guds hond er sterk – Empotionally compelling and monstrously heavy, Men Guds hond er sterk is death doom at its peak form.
- Khirki // Κυκεώνας – Massively dynamic hard rock that comes from the heart and the head, not the butt.
- Saidan // Visual Kill: The Blossoming of Psychotic Depravity – Fun, fast, ferocious, Visual Kill is an unqualified blast of killer hyper-melodic black metal.
- Unhallowed Deliverance // Of Spectres and Strife – Deathcore rarely offers this level of dynamics and quality in songwriting, and it hits like a runaway train full of unstable nuclear warheads.
Non-Metal Album o’ the Year
- Kali Uchis // Orquídeas – Simply put, this album is pure sex. Period.
EP o’ the Year
- Glassbone // Deaf to Suffering – Far and away the slimiest, crustiest, and bestest slam of the year. Absolute filth.
Song o’ the Year
- Elvellon – “A Vagabond’s Heart” – Easily my most listened to song of the year, “A Vagabond’s Heart” strikes a special chord in my spirit that embodies everything I used to love and everything I love today. Furthermore, it leaves me hopeful and excited for what the future holds. As a delightful bonus, it’s catchy as all get-out. I couldn’t ask for a better song to fit this slot.
Surprise o’ the Year:
- Nightwish // Yesterwynde – My original intent was to place this somewhere on my list proper, but the storm foiled that aspiration, as I rarely got to listen to any new music that came out in late September and pretty much all of October until it was way too late. But when I did get to spend time with Yesterwynde, it continually impressed me. Songs that felt novel and exciting, performances that brimmed with new life, and wonderful pacing from start to finish, Nightwish’s latest record feels like a return to form. I’m excited to follow them on this latest arc in their career.5
Disappointment o’ the Year:
- Vredehammer // God Slayer – The riffs are there, that’s for sure. But the album just doesn’t come together in a way that scratches my brain at all. Therefore, I had the most difficult time sitting through God Slayer. Shame, especially considering how much of a banger each of the previous two records were…
#2024 #Amiensus #Brodequin #Elvellon #Feind #Glassbone #Hamferð #Iotunn #KaliUchis #KenstrositySTopTenIshOf2024 #Khirki #MadderMortem #Myrath #Nightwish #Noxis #OceansOfSlumber #Replicant #Saidan #Scumbag #Sunburst #TheFlaying #UnhallowedDeliverance #Vredehammerð
-
Kenstrosity’s Top Ten(ish) of 2024
By Kenstrosity
When I think back on this year, a year of unprecedented stress and struggle for this sponge, one predominant emotion rises above the rest. Gratitude. I went through hardships I couldn’t possibly have anticipated; watched as harrowing events, both global and domestic, rocked our world; and trudged through time-dilating frights that I only previously experienced in some of my worst nightmares. And yet, I persist! I found myself asking, once again, why I was spared a worse fate where others weren’t? What have I done in life to deserve the good fortune I’ve received? In time I’ve come to believe that understanding the why of it all isn’t always the most important part. In some ways, the pursuit of an answer to “why” even blinds us to more enriching lessons we can learn from the experiences we share, both mundane and extraordinary. These things teach us how to be human, how to grow, how to thrive, and how to come together as a community. So, for what must be the first time of my life, I stopped asking why anything happened, as tempting as that spiral always looked from outside. Instead, I spent all of my energy prioritizing the moment, experiencing it, allowing it to change me and mold me, and to be present in it not just for me, but for my friends, my family, and my neighbors.
Back to gratitude. More so this year than any other, I must express my deepest, most heartfelt gratitude for damn near everyone. When my roommate and I lost everything overnight, I felt completely and utterly overwhelmed by the response. Hands of friends, family, and community reached towards us, open to do whatever they could to help us up. AMG Himself, Steel Druhm, Sentynel, GardensTale, Twelve, Dolphin Whisperer, Maddog, Holdeneye, Cherd of Doom, Grymm, El Cuervo, Dr. Wvrm, Ferrous Beuller, Saunders, Eldritch Elitist, Doom_et_Al, Dear Hollow, Carcharodon, Felgund, Ferox, Thus Spoke, Iceberg, Mystikus Hugebeard, Itchy, the n00bs, a shit ton of Discord frens, all of my meatspace friends, Mom, Dad, my sister, some of my extended family, my work colleagues and acquaintances, random kind strangers, even Dr. A. N. Grier went above and beyond to help directly with our recovery. Every single member of staff here did whatever they could to give some relief, far beyond what I could’ve ever asked for, and it overwhelms my little heart to know they cared that deeply. My owlpal and great friend Rolderathis, writer and editor at Toilet ov Hell, unexpectedly swooped in via Discord to jump start our financial recovery by creating a crowdsourcing page for us—even as the admin for AMG planned to do the same. Instrumental to its dissemination and subsequent explosion,1 both AMG Himself and Steel Druhm made sure to aggressively spread the word via an official post on this very site, and in their own circles public and private. Friends and family did the same, to great effect. Toilet ov Hell even posted their own article, too, and I don’t even fucking write there. Incredible. My aunt and her husband helped us replace two full rooms worth of furniture without hesitation, and another close friend of mine provided yet another room’s worth on top of that. Our friends reached far and wide to find opportunities to get us shelter, food, essential items, and vital emotional support. FEMA did more than their part for us as well, and they continue to help us as we navigate the next stages of long-term recovery. My therapist stuck with me through the storm, helped carry me through some concerning emotional blockages shortly after, and continues to guide me now. The continuous waves of support and outreach blew me away, and motivated me to pay it forward in whatever way I was capable for those who were going through hell with us. I thank you all, from the bottom of my heart.
As if a hurricane wasn’t enough to bear, Mom was diagnosed with lung cancer just ten days after the storm hit. Still, there shined small silver linings that kept me going. It was caught very early, and she has already returned home after a resoundingly successful surgery, where they removed the tumor in block.2 As scary as the thought of losing my Mom right after everything else that’s happened was, I choose to emphasize the excellent treatment and attention to detail that allowed Mom to come home quickly and in decent health, all things considered. I choose to be with my family, to live in this moment through the pain, the fear, the uncertainty, so I can be there when the sun inevitably shines again, too. I want to extend a very special thanks to Dad, who remained constantly by Mom’s side and supported her through every stage of this development when I wasn’t able.
All of this merely scratches the surface of everything we’ve gone through in 2024. But we are still here!3 We are living the best we can, helping each other to survive, and perhaps soon to also thrive again. The sense of community I feel not just for my deeply wounded city, but also the people in my life, deepened significantly just in the last few months. These experiences have changed me, changed my outlook on life and on relationships. The fragility of life and the sheer power of the love that comes from the people in it sharpen my understanding of what’s really important. Life is about the people you have, the way you treat them, and how you conduct yourself in this world to try to improve it with your unique light, little by little. It’s about supporting your loved ones as they go through good times just as fiercely as when they go through hardship and change. It’s about growing every day into the very best version of yourself, and being there to witness and celebrate the same journey in those close to you. I understand that more today than ever before, and I am thankful that this lesson, above all else, is my takeaway from 2024.
It’s going to be a while before we can return home to AVL, but I’ve already returned full force to my home away from home, Angry Metal Guy! I’d like to thank Steel Druhm and AMG Himself again for keeping my spot warm for me and for being excellent taskmasters and blogrunners, to Sentynel for keeping things running smoothly on the back end and for being awesome in general at his job, to all the writers for continuously providing the internet with the best worst opinions on metal extant, and to Dr. A. N. Grier for deleting everything I’ve ever written so that nobody has to suffer my silly goofy ramblings.
With that said, everybody should probably snapshot this little Top Ten(ish) of mine before Grier deletes that, too. It looks mighty different to how it would’ve had the storm not happened, both because I couldn’t listen to any new music for a while and because the event itself ushered a sharp shift in my listening preferences. Regardless, I’m happy with my selections, and I fully expect the rest of you to rabble at my confounding omissions.4 Let it commence!
#ish. Elvellon // Ascending in Synergy – Elvellon holds a special place in my heart, and thanks to masterful songsmithing, Ascending in Synergy holds a well-deserved placement on my list. I simply haven’t been able to stop jamming it all year. Ascending in Synergy is everything I loved about metal when I first got into it, and it embodies much of what I love about metal today. It never hurts that the first eight songs are all megaton bangers. This record would have placed nearer the top if it weren’t for the monologue in the penultimate epic. Nonetheless, I love Ascending in Synergy.
#10. Madder Mortem // Old Eyes, New Heart – Ever since Marrow, Madder Mortem successfully won me over where every other album in their back catalog failed to resonate. I can’t explain what exactly it was that captured my adoration all of a sudden, but Old Eyes, New Heart has my heart just as Marrow did before it. Smart compositions, earnest delivery, crystalline lyrics, lush sound, this record has it all. I’d be a fool not to award it placement on this list.
#9. Oceans of Slumber // Where Gods Fear to Speak – Oceans of Slumber carved out an ever-evolving, fearlessly creative, and unique sound for themselves since their inception, but always seemed somewhat inconsistent with the quality of their songwriting. Not so on their magnum opus Where Gods Fear to Speak. Immense, cohesive, and richly layered with detail and compelling songwriting, Where Gods Fear to Speak feels like the culmination of their entire career, fully matured and refined to peak form.
#8. Sunburst // Manifesto – There was a point in time that I was confident Manifesto would top this list. That was largely due to sheer excitement that a new Sunburst album, which I never thought I would see in the first place, actually turned out to be great. Rich compositions, sharp hooks, and a masterful performance from everyone involved, Manifesto solidifies Sunburst as one of the best bands out of the Greek power metal scene. I just hope that I don’t have to wait another eight years for the next one!
#7. Scumbag // Homicide Cult – This record is simply unfair. I had my Top 10 all sorted out, and then some bottle-nosed bastard with a dorsal fin and a propensity for beating up smaller mammals on the wrong side of the sea had me check this out, with the promise of killer riffs by the main Noxis guitarist. That bastard was right, this record absolutely rips. There are so many unbelievably filthy, stank-face inducing riffs on Homicide Cult that I had to get plastic surgery to look like myself again. Otherwise, I’d look more like my rotted-out friend on the cover.
#6. Noxis // Violence Inherent in the System – Death metal this good hits me in a special place. While embodying all of the skullcrushing ways of olde, Violence Inherent in the System represents one of the most creative, smart, and well-produced records in modern death metal currently. And while my review helped spike the hype, it still feels a bit like Noxis are running further under the radar than they deserve. Coming out of absolute nowhere and dropping the best straight-up death metal of the year? Unreal.
#5. Feind // Ambulante Hirnamputation – Grind, and all of its hybrids, never once made it on my proper Top 10. I’ve written here for six years. That’s how powerful Feind’s Ambulante Hirnamputation truly is. Immense fun, more quality riffs stuffed into less than twenty minutes than some of the best records can fit into an hour, and cheeky to boot, Ambulante Hirnamputation proves that Feind mastered the grindset. Let’s hope this isn’t the last I get to hear of Feind.
#4. Brodequin // Harbinger of Woe – In contrast to grind, I almost always have a brutal death metal record on my Top 10. It’s a style that resonates with me very easily, and there’s never a shortage of it for my personal enjoyment. Brodequin won the day in a year chock full of great options, with the immensely accessible Harbinger of Woe. The sheer level of groove brimming from this torture chamber sends my booty into overdrive, and the thick, nasty production only serves to enhance the entire experience. There’s very little else I could ask for to sate my brutal death cravings.
#3. Iotunn // Kinship – It’s been a banner year for our friend Jon Aldará. Where Iotunn’s Access All Worlds interested, but did not woo, me, follow-up Kinship absolutely rocked my socks. Every single track is a celebration of epic, melodic, and deeply immersive extreme metal. Gorgeous compositions, ascendant guitar work, ridiculous replay value, and stellar vocals propelled Kinship way up on my list of favorite records at a blistering pace, leaving me revelling in an idyllic honeymoon period. Even after investing more time marinating in its wondrous environs, I’ve only fallen deeper and deeper in love with it. I just can’t imagine how Iotunn are going to top this.
#2. Replicant // Infinite Mortality – This is the year for records that floored me where their predecessors didn’t. Replicant’s Malignant Reality was enjoyable, but couldn’t touch my Top 10 in its year. Infinite Mortality, on the other hand, made a valiant bid for Album o’ the Year from the very first riff kicking “Acid Mirror” into the stratosphere. Hardcore-tinged technical death metal for fans of the discordant and the unorthodox, Infinite Mortality is supremely memorable not just for its sound, but for its infallible, hook-laden construction. Infinite Mortality may not be the only record of its kind released this year, but it’s without a doubt the greatest.
#1. Myrath // Karma – Hurricane Helene took my home. It changed the ecology, geology, and pedology of the entire Asheville region, likely for all time. But one thing it couldn’t take from me is my spirit, my drive to survive, and my determination to thrive. Even during a long period where access to music was a rare luxury, Karma remained at the forefront of my mind. It held me from giving up and reminded me of the strength that burgeoned not just in myself, but also in my friends, family, and greater community as we rebuilt our lives together. If there was ever a record released this year that embodies that spirit of triumph over adversity, it’s Myrath’s incredible Karma. It was always going to be high on this list, thanks to its insanely memorable songwriting and passionate performances of univerally great songs. However, it wasn’t until I personally resonated with its empowering message in the context of a devastating natural disaster that I knew this would be, unquestionably, my Album o’ the Year.
Honorable Mentions
- Amiensus // Reclamation Pt. II – Thoughtful, dynamic, and immersive, Reclamation Pt. II represents the pinnacle of what I like in progressive black metal.
- The Flaying // Ni dieu ni maître – Unsung melodic death metal heroes The Flaying offer up nonstop hooks and a crazy bass performance delivered at a feral pace.
- Hamferð // Men Guds hond er sterk – Empotionally compelling and monstrously heavy, Men Guds hond er sterk is death doom at its peak form.
- Khirki // Κυκεώνας – Massively dynamic hard rock that comes from the heart and the head, not the butt.
- Saidan // Visual Kill: The Blossoming of Psychotic Depravity – Fun, fast, ferocious, Visual Kill is an unqualified blast of killer hyper-melodic black metal.
- Unhallowed Deliverance // Of Spectres and Strife – Deathcore rarely offers this level of dynamics and quality in songwriting, and it hits like a runaway train full of unstable nuclear warheads.
Non-Metal Album o’ the Year
- Kali Uchis // Orquídeas – Simply put, this album is pure sex. Period.
EP o’ the Year
- Glassbone // Deaf to Suffering – Far and away the slimiest, crustiest, and bestest slam of the year. Absolute filth.
Song o’ the Year
- Elvellon – “A Vagabond’s Heart” – Easily my most listened to song of the year, “A Vagabond’s Heart” strikes a special chord in my spirit that embodies everything I used to love and everything I love today. Furthermore, it leaves me hopeful and excited for what the future holds. As a delightful bonus, it’s catchy as all get-out. I couldn’t ask for a better song to fit this slot.
Surprise o’ the Year:
- Nightwish // Yesterwynde – My original intent was to place this somewhere on my list proper, but the storm foiled that aspiration, as I rarely got to listen to any new music that came out in late September and pretty much all of October until it was way too late. But when I did get to spend time with Yesterwynde, it continually impressed me. Songs that felt novel and exciting, performances that brimmed with new life, and wonderful pacing from start to finish, Nightwish’s latest record feels like a return to form. I’m excited to follow them on this latest arc in their career.5
Disappointment o’ the Year:
- Vredehammer // God Slayer – The riffs are there, that’s for sure. But the album just doesn’t come together in a way that scratches my brain at all. Therefore, I had the most difficult time sitting through God Slayer. Shame, especially considering how much of a banger each of the previous two records were…
#2024 #Amiensus #Brodequin #Elvellon #Feind #Glassbone #Hamferð #Iotunn #KaliUchis #KenstrositySTopTenIshOf2024 #Khirki #MadderMortem #Myrath #Nightwish #Noxis #OceansOfSlumber #Replicant #Saidan #Scumbag #Sunburst #TheFlaying #UnhallowedDeliverance #Vredehammerð
-
Kenstrosity’s Top Ten(ish) of 2024
By Kenstrosity
When I think back on this year, a year of unprecedented stress and struggle for this sponge, one predominant emotion rises above the rest. Gratitude. I went through hardships I couldn’t possibly have anticipated; watched as harrowing events, both global and domestic, rocked our world; and trudged through time-dilating frights that I only previously experienced in some of my worst nightmares. And yet, I persist! I found myself asking, once again, why I was spared a worse fate where others weren’t? What have I done in life to deserve the good fortune I’ve received? In time I’ve come to believe that understanding the why of it all isn’t always the most important part. In some ways, the pursuit of an answer to “why” even blinds us to more enriching lessons we can learn from the experiences we share, both mundane and extraordinary. These things teach us how to be human, how to grow, how to thrive, and how to come together as a community. So, for what must be the first time of my life, I stopped asking why anything happened, as tempting as that spiral always looked from outside. Instead, I spent all of my energy prioritizing the moment, experiencing it, allowing it to change me and mold me, and to be present in it not just for me, but for my friends, my family, and my neighbors.
Back to gratitude. More so this year than any other, I must express my deepest, most heartfelt gratitude for damn near everyone. When my roommate and I lost everything overnight, I felt completely and utterly overwhelmed by the response. Hands of friends, family, and community reached towards us, open to do whatever they could to help us up. AMG Himself, Steel Druhm, Sentynel, GardensTale, Twelve, Dolphin Whisperer, Maddog, Holdeneye, Cherd of Doom, Grymm, El Cuervo, Dr. Wvrm, Ferrous Beuller, Saunders, Eldritch Elitist, Doom_et_Al, Dear Hollow, Carcharodon, Felgund, Ferox, Thus Spoke, Iceberg, Mystikus Hugebeard, Itchy, the n00bs, a shit ton of Discord frens, all of my meatspace friends, Mom, Dad, my sister, some of my extended family, my work colleagues and acquaintances, random kind strangers, even Dr. A. N. Grier went above and beyond to help directly with our recovery. Every single member of staff here did whatever they could to give some relief, far beyond what I could’ve ever asked for, and it overwhelms my little heart to know they cared that deeply. My owlpal and great friend Rolderathis, writer and editor at Toilet ov Hell, unexpectedly swooped in via Discord to jump start our financial recovery by creating a crowdsourcing page for us—even as the admin for AMG planned to do the same. Instrumental to its dissemination and subsequent explosion,1 both AMG Himself and Steel Druhm made sure to aggressively spread the word via an official post on this very site, and in their own circles public and private. Friends and family did the same, to great effect. Toilet ov Hell even posted their own article, too, and I don’t even fucking write there. Incredible. My aunt and her husband helped us replace two full rooms worth of furniture without hesitation, and another close friend of mine provided yet another room’s worth on top of that. Our friends reached far and wide to find opportunities to get us shelter, food, essential items, and vital emotional support. FEMA did more than their part for us as well, and they continue to help us as we navigate the next stages of long-term recovery. My therapist stuck with me through the storm, helped carry me through some concerning emotional blockages shortly after, and continues to guide me now. The continuous waves of support and outreach blew me away, and motivated me to pay it forward in whatever way I was capable for those who were going through hell with us. I thank you all, from the bottom of my heart.
As if a hurricane wasn’t enough to bear, Mom was diagnosed with lung cancer just ten days after the storm hit. Still, there shined small silver linings that kept me going. It was caught very early, and she has already returned home after a resoundingly successful surgery, where they removed the tumor in block.2 As scary as the thought of losing my Mom right after everything else that’s happened was, I choose to emphasize the excellent treatment and attention to detail that allowed Mom to come home quickly and in decent health, all things considered. I choose to be with my family, to live in this moment through the pain, the fear, the uncertainty, so I can be there when the sun inevitably shines again, too. I want to extend a very special thanks to Dad, who remained constantly by Mom’s side and supported her through every stage of this development when I wasn’t able.
All of this merely scratches the surface of everything we’ve gone through in 2024. But we are still here!3 We are living the best we can, helping each other to survive, and perhaps soon to also thrive again. The sense of community I feel not just for my deeply wounded city, but also the people in my life, deepened significantly just in the last few months. These experiences have changed me, changed my outlook on life and on relationships. The fragility of life and the sheer power of the love that comes from the people in it sharpen my understanding of what’s really important. Life is about the people you have, the way you treat them, and how you conduct yourself in this world to try to improve it with your unique light, little by little. It’s about supporting your loved ones as they go through good times just as fiercely as when they go through hardship and change. It’s about growing every day into the very best version of yourself, and being there to witness and celebrate the same journey in those close to you. I understand that more today than ever before, and I am thankful that this lesson, above all else, is my takeaway from 2024.
It’s going to be a while before we can return home to AVL, but I’ve already returned full force to my home away from home, Angry Metal Guy! I’d like to thank Steel Druhm and AMG Himself again for keeping my spot warm for me and for being excellent taskmasters and blogrunners, to Sentynel for keeping things running smoothly on the back end and for being awesome in general at his job, to all the writers for continuously providing the internet with the best worst opinions on metal extant, and to Dr. A. N. Grier for deleting everything I’ve ever written so that nobody has to suffer my silly goofy ramblings.
With that said, everybody should probably snapshot this little Top Ten(ish) of mine before Grier deletes that, too. It looks mighty different to how it would’ve had the storm not happened, both because I couldn’t listen to any new music for a while and because the event itself ushered a sharp shift in my listening preferences. Regardless, I’m happy with my selections, and I fully expect the rest of you to rabble at my confounding omissions.4 Let it commence!
#ish. Elvellon // Ascending in Synergy – Elvellon holds a special place in my heart, and thanks to masterful songsmithing, Ascending in Synergy holds a well-deserved placement on my list. I simply haven’t been able to stop jamming it all year. Ascending in Synergy is everything I loved about metal when I first got into it, and it embodies much of what I love about metal today. It never hurts that the first eight songs are all megaton bangers. This record would have placed nearer the top if it weren’t for the monologue in the penultimate epic. Nonetheless, I love Ascending in Synergy.
#10. Madder Mortem // Old Eyes, New Heart – Ever since Marrow, Madder Mortem successfully won me over where every other album in their back catalog failed to resonate. I can’t explain what exactly it was that captured my adoration all of a sudden, but Old Eyes, New Heart has my heart just as Marrow did before it. Smart compositions, earnest delivery, crystalline lyrics, lush sound, this record has it all. I’d be a fool not to award it placement on this list.
#9. Oceans of Slumber // Where Gods Fear to Speak – Oceans of Slumber carved out an ever-evolving, fearlessly creative, and unique sound for themselves since their inception, but always seemed somewhat inconsistent with the quality of their songwriting. Not so on their magnum opus Where Gods Fear to Speak. Immense, cohesive, and richly layered with detail and compelling songwriting, Where Gods Fear to Speak feels like the culmination of their entire career, fully matured and refined to peak form.
#8. Sunburst // Manifesto – There was a point in time that I was confident Manifesto would top this list. That was largely due to sheer excitement that a new Sunburst album, which I never thought I would see in the first place, actually turned out to be great. Rich compositions, sharp hooks, and a masterful performance from everyone involved, Manifesto solidifies Sunburst as one of the best bands out of the Greek power metal scene. I just hope that I don’t have to wait another eight years for the next one!
#7. Scumbag // Homicide Cult – This record is simply unfair. I had my Top 10 all sorted out, and then some bottle-nosed bastard with a dorsal fin and a propensity for beating up smaller mammals on the wrong side of the sea had me check this out, with the promise of killer riffs by the main Noxis guitarist. That bastard was right, this record absolutely rips. There are so many unbelievably filthy, stank-face inducing riffs on Homicide Cult that I had to get plastic surgery to look like myself again. Otherwise, I’d look more like my rotted-out friend on the cover.
#6. Noxis // Violence Inherent in the System – Death metal this good hits me in a special place. While embodying all of the skullcrushing ways of olde, Violence Inherent in the System represents one of the most creative, smart, and well-produced records in modern death metal currently. And while my review helped spike the hype, it still feels a bit like Noxis are running further under the radar than they deserve. Coming out of absolute nowhere and dropping the best straight-up death metal of the year? Unreal.
#5. Feind // Ambulante Hirnamputation – Grind, and all of its hybrids, never once made it on my proper Top 10. I’ve written here for six years. That’s how powerful Feind’s Ambulante Hirnamputation truly is. Immense fun, more quality riffs stuffed into less than twenty minutes than some of the best records can fit into an hour, and cheeky to boot, Ambulante Hirnamputation proves that Feind mastered the grindset. Let’s hope this isn’t the last I get to hear of Feind.
#4. Brodequin // Harbinger of Woe – In contrast to grind, I almost always have a brutal death metal record on my Top 10. It’s a style that resonates with me very easily, and there’s never a shortage of it for my personal enjoyment. Brodequin won the day in a year chock full of great options, with the immensely accessible Harbinger of Woe. The sheer level of groove brimming from this torture chamber sends my booty into overdrive, and the thick, nasty production only serves to enhance the entire experience. There’s very little else I could ask for to sate my brutal death cravings.
#3. Iotunn // Kinship – It’s been a banner year for our friend Jon Aldará. Where Iotunn’s Access All Worlds interested, but did not woo, me, follow-up Kinship absolutely rocked my socks. Every single track is a celebration of epic, melodic, and deeply immersive extreme metal. Gorgeous compositions, ascendant guitar work, ridiculous replay value, and stellar vocals propelled Kinship way up on my list of favorite records at a blistering pace, leaving me revelling in an idyllic honeymoon period. Even after investing more time marinating in its wondrous environs, I’ve only fallen deeper and deeper in love with it. I just can’t imagine how Iotunn are going to top this.
#2. Replicant // Infinite Mortality – This is the year for records that floored me where their predecessors didn’t. Replicant’s Malignant Reality was enjoyable, but couldn’t touch my Top 10 in its year. Infinite Mortality, on the other hand, made a valiant bid for Album o’ the Year from the very first riff kicking “Acid Mirror” into the stratosphere. Hardcore-tinged technical death metal for fans of the discordant and the unorthodox, Infinite Mortality is supremely memorable not just for its sound, but for its infallible, hook-laden construction. Infinite Mortality may not be the only record of its kind released this year, but it’s without a doubt the greatest.
#1. Myrath // Karma – Hurricane Helene took my home. It changed the ecology, geology, and pedology of the entire Asheville region, likely for all time. But one thing it couldn’t take from me is my spirit, my drive to survive, and my determination to thrive. Even during a long period where access to music was a rare luxury, Karma remained at the forefront of my mind. It held me from giving up and reminded me of the strength that burgeoned not just in myself, but also in my friends, family, and greater community as we rebuilt our lives together. If there was ever a record released this year that embodies that spirit of triumph over adversity, it’s Myrath’s incredible Karma. It was always going to be high on this list, thanks to its insanely memorable songwriting and passionate performances of univerally great songs. However, it wasn’t until I personally resonated with its empowering message in the context of a devastating natural disaster that I knew this would be, unquestionably, my Album o’ the Year.
Honorable Mentions
- Amiensus // Reclamation Pt. II – Thoughtful, dynamic, and immersive, Reclamation Pt. II represents the pinnacle of what I like in progressive black metal.
- The Flaying // Ni dieu ni maître – Unsung melodic death metal heroes The Flaying offer up nonstop hooks and a crazy bass performance delivered at a feral pace.
- Hamferð // Men Guds hond er sterk – Empotionally compelling and monstrously heavy, Men Guds hond er sterk is death doom at its peak form.
- Khirki // Κυκεώνας – Massively dynamic hard rock that comes from the heart and the head, not the butt.
- Saidan // Visual Kill: The Blossoming of Psychotic Depravity – Fun, fast, ferocious, Visual Kill is an unqualified blast of killer hyper-melodic black metal.
- Unhallowed Deliverance // Of Spectres and Strife – Deathcore rarely offers this level of dynamics and quality in songwriting, and it hits like a runaway train full of unstable nuclear warheads.
Non-Metal Album o’ the Year
- Kali Uchis // Orquídeas – Simply put, this album is pure sex. Period.
EP o’ the Year
- Glassbone // Deaf to Suffering – Far and away the slimiest, crustiest, and bestest slam of the year. Absolute filth.
Song o’ the Year
- Elvellon – “A Vagabond’s Heart” – Easily my most listened to song of the year, “A Vagabond’s Heart” strikes a special chord in my spirit that embodies everything I used to love and everything I love today. Furthermore, it leaves me hopeful and excited for what the future holds. As a delightful bonus, it’s catchy as all get-out. I couldn’t ask for a better song to fit this slot.
Surprise o’ the Year:
- Nightwish // Yesterwynde – My original intent was to place this somewhere on my list proper, but the storm foiled that aspiration, as I rarely got to listen to any new music that came out in late September and pretty much all of October until it was way too late. But when I did get to spend time with Yesterwynde, it continually impressed me. Songs that felt novel and exciting, performances that brimmed with new life, and wonderful pacing from start to finish, Nightwish’s latest record feels like a return to form. I’m excited to follow them on this latest arc in their career.5
Disappointment o’ the Year:
- Vredehammer // God Slayer – The riffs are there, that’s for sure. But the album just doesn’t come together in a way that scratches my brain at all. Therefore, I had the most difficult time sitting through God Slayer. Shame, especially considering how much of a banger each of the previous two records were…
#2024 #Amiensus #Brodequin #Elvellon #Feind #Glassbone #Hamferð #Iotunn #KaliUchis #KenstrositySTopTenIshOf2024 #Khirki #MadderMortem #Myrath #Nightwish #Noxis #OceansOfSlumber #Replicant #Saidan #Scumbag #Sunburst #TheFlaying #UnhallowedDeliverance #Vredehammerð