home.social

#utilitarianism — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #utilitarianism, aggregated by home.social.

  1. John Stuart Mill's "On Liberty" has long been published in just his name, but a new edition lists Harriet Taylor Mill as co-author.

    This was partly based on research done with our archive of Mill-Taylor material, and we've just finished digitising it all.

    Volumes are slowly going up on our open access Digital Library over the coming days and weeks: digital.library.lse.ac.uk/coll

    #philosophy #HarrietTaylorMill #JohnStuartMill #utilitarianism #liberty #archives #politics @archivistodon

  2. Recent Poems

    The Questions

    Again the moon comes up in the night
    Again the stars
    They stir up in me some questions
    Without letting me know
    Where the answers might be
    Nor is the sky helpful
    Soon it will be dawn
    And the most useless guy to ask
    When it comes to such questions
    Will be there, giving life to us
    But not the kind of life we are seeking.

    I and U

    I love her still
    Who I loved
    40+ years ago.

    Did she love me
    Back then
    Though I know
    She does not now.

    Are We Worthy?

    That we can love
    A boy a girl, a girl a boy
    That we can learn
    About volcanoes and the stars
    That we can cry
    At the most trivial of losses
    That we can laugh
    At the silliest of antics
    That we can help
    Whether a friend or a foe
    That we can sacrifice
    Our very life
    Does it not give you hope
    That we are well equipped
    To find the Truth, too?

    Bruised But Not Broken

    The supercilious smile
    The unmistakable smirk
    Have taken their toll
    Yes, I am bruised
    But I am a smart guy
    Smarter than others reckon
    So, I am not broken.

    Sam ki Shayari Ya Shaam ki Shayari

    Jis shakhs se mujhe milna tha
    Afsos toda bahut hoti hai ki
    Woh mereko tab aakar mili
    Jab meri shaam ho chuki thi
    Lekin khuda ko maaloom hai
    Ismay bhi kya meri bhalai hai.

    Where Am I Headed? Where Am I Supposed to Be Headed?

    Where’s life taking me?
    Where’s my heart taking me?
    Do they think they know me
    Better than I know myself?
    Who is this I that asks the question
    What is his relationship
    With life and heart?

    This Thing Called Acceptance

    Eckhart Tolle talked about it
    Much before him, two more talked
    Much, much about it
    JK and Osho, naam toh suna hoga
    But, damn it guys, I accept myself
    Easily without breaking into a sweat
    I can accept life also, whatever turns it takes
    But, it is the “other”, who does not
    Who looks at me askance
    And sometimes the “Not Other”, too,
    And thus I spend my life here on earth
    Not knowing what is “acceptable”?

    The Lips

    A poet tells me
    Lips are meant for kissing
    A sage tells me
    Lips are meant to be zipped
    Confused, I take out my laptop
    And start typing.

    Past the Midnight Hour

    Under the cover of darkness, emboldened
    Many a memory makes its appearance
    In the theater of my mind, one after another
    And I who have had delusions in the past
    Can no longer trust which memory is genuine
    For instance, one memory is rather persistent
    And keeps appearing every now and then:
    A girl smiling at me; what to make of it?
    Should I start taking that antipsychotic?
    I’d rather not, lest my psychiatrist say
    “I told you so”, with that stupid grin.

    The “No”

    The no
    Falling from some lips
    Is far more problematic
    Than from some other lips.

    The Contradictions

    Somewhere in this quest
    To make a living
    To live and love
    To find the truth, sometimes
    Life lands a sucker punch
    When we are least expecting it.

    All the Good We Can Do in This World

    It is good to be laughed at
    It is good to be made fun of
    It is good to become a lughing stock
    What a wonderful way to be
    Where we are so useful to others
    And Bentham’s soul would rest in peace.

    #Acceptance #Heart #Life #Lips #Love #Poem #Poetry #Resilience #Truth #Utilitarianism
  3. “They are no philosophical race”: Nietzsche’s Critique of the Englishman’s Philosophy

    Nietzsche had a sharp and often contemptuous view of what he called “English psychology” and the broader tradition of British empiricist and utilitarian moral philosophy. His critique is scattered across several works — Beyond Good and Evil, Twilight of the Idols, On the Genealogy of Morality, and The Gay Science — but forms a coherent attack on a whole intellectual temperament.

    1. The Critique of Utilitarianism and the “Herd Morality”

    Nietzsche’s most sustained target was Utilitarian ethics — chiefly Bentham and Mill’s reduction of morality to the calculation of pleasure and pain, and the maximization of happiness for the greatest number.

    • He found this mediocre and life-denying: it privileges comfort, safety, and the average over excellence, risk, and greatness.
    • Utilitarianism, for Nietzsche, is the philosophical expression of the herd — a morality that flattens hierarchy and punishes the exceptional individual.
    • “Man does not strive for happiness; only the Englishman does,” he quipped in Twilight of the Idols — meaning that making happiness the supreme value is a parochial, petit-bourgeois illusion.

    2. The Attack on British Empiricism and Its Psychologists

    In Beyond Good and Evil (Part I) and On the Genealogy of Morality (Preface), Nietzsche attacks English moral psychologists — figures like Spencer, Hume, and their successors — for:

    • Lacking historical sense: They projected modern values (utility, sympathy, altruism) backward onto all of human history, as if these had always been the basis of morality.
    • Flatness of soul: They could only explain the origin of moral concepts mechanistically — habit, utility, association — and missed the deeper question of the value of values themselves.
    • “They are no philosophical race”: Nietzsche says this explicitly in Beyond Good and Evil (§252), charging that the English lack the instinct for genuine philosophy. They are capable of great industry and data-gathering but not of the bold, creative, self-overcoming thought he demands of a philosopher.

    3. Darwin and the Problem of “Survival”

    Nietzsche had a complicated relationship with Darwin, but largely rejected Social Darwinism and the popular English interpretation of evolution:

    • The “survival of the fittest” was vulgarized into a justification for mediocrity — it is the most numerous, the most adaptable, the most average that survive, not the highest.
    • Nietzsche argued that nature often sacrifices the species for the sake of the exceptional individual — the reverse of what the Darwinian moralists claimed.
    • Evolution, in the English reading, pointed downward toward conformity; Nietzsche wanted to point upward toward the Übermensch.

    4. Critique of Sympathy and Altruism (Spencer & the “Comfortable” Ethics)

    Herbert Spencer attempted to merge evolution with utilitarian ethics, grounding morality in social cooperation and sympathy. Nietzsche despised this:

    • Sympathy (Mitleid) — “feeling with suffering” — was for Nietzsche a form of weakness and even a contagion of suffering, not a virtue.
    • Altruism as a supreme value he traced (in the Genealogy) to slave morality — the resentful inversion of aristocratic values by the weak.
    • Spencer’s “evolution toward happiness” was, to Nietzsche, a comfortable lie told by a civilization in decline.

    5. The Deeper Charge: Mediocrity of Philosophical Spirit

    Beyond specific doctrines, Nietzsche’s critique is temperamental and cultural:

    “They are not a philosophical race — the English: Bacon represents an attack on the philosophical spirit generally, Hobbes, Hume, and Locke an abasement and a depreciation of the idea of a ‘philosopher’ for more than a century.”Beyond Good and Evil, §252

    The English philosopher, in Nietzsche’s portrait, is:

    • Too empirical — chained to facts, unable to think beyond them
    • Too Christian in disguise — utilitarian altruism is secularized Christian morality without the honesty of its theological roots
    • Too comfortable — philosophizing in service of stability, society, and contentment, rather than danger, solitude, and transformation

    Summary Table

    TargetNietzsche’s ChargeUtilitarianism (Bentham/Mill)Herd morality; reduces life to comfortEmpiricism (Hume/Locke)Debases philosophy; no historical senseDarwinism (Spencer)Glorifies the average; misreads natureAltruism/SympathySlave morality in disguise; weaknessEnglish “character”Industrious but philosophically shallow

    A Fair Assessment

    Nietzsche’s critique, while brilliant and penetrating, is also polemical and sometimes unfair. Hume, in particular, is a far deeper thinker than Nietzsche credits. And Nietzsche himself borrows more from the British tradition than he admits — his psychological method of unmasking morality owes something to precisely the “English psychologists” he mocks. The critique is best read not as sober scholarship, but as Nietzsche’s philosophical war cry against a particular vision of what life and thought are for.

    #Übermensch #BeyondGoodAndEvil #Blog #BritishEmpiricism #ContinentalPhilosophy #CritiqueOfMorality #Ethics #FriedrichNietzsche #GenealogyOfMorality #HerdMorality #HistoryOfPhilosophy #MillAndBentham #Nietzsche #NietzscheVsDarwin #PhilosophicalCritique #Philosophy #SlaveMorality #Utilitarianism #WesternPhilosophy
  4. «‘Meta used BitTorrent because it was a MORE EFFICIENT and reliable means of obtaining the datasets …’ Meta’s attorney writes.»

    Seriously ‽ They’re arguing that expediency justifies systematic and widespread copyright infringement for the sake of MAXIMIZING WEALTH‽

    #utilitarianism runs completely #amok #buckvbell revisited m.einverne.info/@HackerNewsBot

  5. «‘Meta used BitTorrent because it was a MORE EFFICIENT and reliable means of obtaining the datasets …’ Meta’s attorney writes.»

    Seriously ‽ They’re arguing that expediency justifies systematic and widespread copyright infringement for the sake of MAXIMIZING WEALTH‽

    #utilitarianism runs completely #amok #buckvbell revisited m.einverne.info/@HackerNewsBot

  6. «‘Meta used BitTorrent because it was a MORE EFFICIENT and reliable means of obtaining the datasets …’ Meta’s attorney writes.»

    Seriously ‽ They’re arguing that expediency justifies systematic and widespread copyright infringement for the sake of MAXIMIZING WEALTH‽

    #utilitarianism runs completely #amok #buckvbell revisited m.einverne.info/@HackerNewsBot

  7. «‘Meta used BitTorrent because it was a MORE EFFICIENT and reliable means of obtaining the datasets …’ Meta’s attorney writes.»

    Seriously ‽ They’re arguing that expediency justifies systematic and widespread copyright infringement for the sake of MAXIMIZING WEALTH‽

    #utilitarianism runs completely #amok #buckvbell revisited m.einverne.info/@HackerNewsBot

  8. «‘Meta used BitTorrent because it was a MORE EFFICIENT and reliable means of obtaining the datasets …’ Meta’s attorney writes.»

    Seriously ‽ They’re arguing that expediency justifies systematic and widespread copyright infringement for the sake of MAXIMIZING WEALTH‽

    runs completely revisited m.einverne.info/@HackerNewsBot

  9. In the context of workplace mobbing, how can managers balance the happiness of the majority with the well-being of the individual, and what role does empathy play in moral decision-making?
    mobingas.lt/en/when-killing-br
    #WorkplaceBullying #Utilitarianism #Synderesis #science

  10. @ovid

    #Kant’s Categorical Imperative places the good outside of human reason, discerned as a special feeling of duty. He wanted to recover faith as the source of morality.

    #JohnStuartMill’s #Utilitarianism is just hedonism plus Christianity: love your neighbor’s pleasure. “Good” is quantity over quality and your virtue comes from how large a group (excluding yourself) you disinterestedly serve, whatever their values.

    Either are fine for “#AI” robots, not humans.

    #philosophy

  11. Beyond the applied ML context, I see a lot of connections to the limitations of #utilitarianism, utilitarian aggregation / #populationEthics, #rationality, #longtermism, subjective #Bayesianism, etc. But would anyone read any of that?

  12. I wrote an article on the for . I provide two solutions to the problem and argue for where our focus should be headed.

    “Two Solutions to the Trolley Problem for Self Driving Cars” by Philosopher Scholar link.medium.com/Qa1r45C65R