home.social

#theoryofmind — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #theoryofmind, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. There is a fundamental flaw in the idea that consciousness can be defined "functionally" (i.e. "it is what it does").

    Consciousness is a purely internal state - we infer it in others through communication, but it is fundamentally something someone experiences about themself, not something defined by how other people perceive them.

    Because it is an internally defined property, it *cannot* be defined on the basis of "what it does". It must be defined, at least in part, on the basis of "what it knows".

    To take a simple example from robotics:
    I have a robot with one gripper and two sensors that moves through its environment. One sensor (A) tells the robot whether its gripper is full or empty. The other sensor (B) tells the robot whether or not it is in the presence of something its gripper can pick up (an object, P).

    The robot has three rules.
    1. If no P, move in a random direction.
    2. If gripper is empty and P sensed, pick up object and then move in a random direction.
    3. If gripper is full and P sensed, drop object and then move in a random direction.

    This robot has no concept of anything in its world except P/not P, gripper full/empty, and "move in a random direction".

    Yet, externally, the effect of these rules is that the robot builds piles of objects [1].

    Attributing consciousness to an LLM is the equivalent of saying our robot *intends* to build piles of objects.

    1/3

    Triggering article: slowboring.com/p/nobody-knows-

    #LLMs #consciousness #robotics #theoryofmind

  2. There is a fundamental flaw in the idea that consciousness can be defined "functionally" (i.e. "it is what it does").

    Consciousness is a purely internal state - we infer it in others through communication, but it is fundamentally something someone experiences about themself, not something defined by how other people perceive them.

    Because it is an internally defined property, it *cannot* be defined on the basis of "what it does". It must be defined, at least in part, on the basis of "what it knows".

    To take a simple example from robotics:
    I have a robot with one gripper and two sensors that moves through its environment. One sensor (A) tells the robot whether its gripper is full or empty. The other sensor (B) tells the robot whether or not it is in the presence of something its gripper can pick up (an object, P).

    The robot has three rules.
    1. If no P, move in a random direction.
    2. If gripper is empty and P sensed, pick up object and then move in a random direction.
    3. If gripper is full and P sensed, drop object and then move in a random direction.

    This robot has no concept of anything in its world except P/not P, gripper full/empty, and "move in a random direction".

    Yet, externally, the effect of these rules is that the robot builds piles of objects [1].

    Attributing consciousness to an LLM is the equivalent of saying our robot *intends* to build piles of objects.

    1/3

    Triggering article: slowboring.com/p/nobody-knows-

    #LLMs #consciousness #robotics #theoryofmind

  3. There is a fundamental flaw in the idea that consciousness can be defined "functionally" (i.e. "it is what it does").

    Consciousness is a purely internal state - we infer it in others through communication, but it is fundamentally something someone experiences about themself, not something defined by how other people perceive them.

    Because it is an internally defined property, it *cannot* be defined on the basis of "what it does". It must be defined, at least in part, on the basis of "what it knows".

    To take a simple example from robotics:
    I have a robot with one gripper and two sensors that moves through its environment. One sensor (A) tells the robot whether its gripper is full or empty. The other sensor (B) tells the robot whether or not it is in the presence of something its gripper can pick up (an object, P).

    The robot has three rules.
    1. If no P, move in a random direction.
    2. If gripper is empty and P sensed, pick up object and then move in a random direction.
    3. If gripper is full and P sensed, drop object and then move in a random direction.

    This robot has no concept of anything in its world except P/not P, gripper full/empty, and "move in a random direction".

    Yet, externally, the effect of these rules is that the robot builds piles of objects [1].

    Attributing consciousness to an LLM is the equivalent of saying our robot *intends* to build piles of objects.

    1/3

    Triggering article: slowboring.com/p/nobody-knows-

    #LLMs #consciousness #robotics #theoryofmind

  4. There is a fundamental flaw in the idea that consciousness can be defined "functionally" (i.e. "it is what it does").

    Consciousness is a purely internal state - we infer it in others through communication, but it is fundamentally something someone experiences about themself, not something defined by how other people perceive them.

    Because it is an internally defined property, it *cannot* be defined on the basis of "what it does". It must be defined, at least in part, on the basis of "what it knows".

    To take a simple example from robotics:
    I have a robot with one gripper and two sensors that moves through its environment. One sensor (A) tells the robot whether its gripper is full or empty. The other sensor (B) tells the robot whether or not it is in the presence of something its gripper can pick up (an object, P).

    The robot has three rules.
    1. If no P, move in a random direction.
    2. If gripper is empty and P sensed, pick up object and then move in a random direction.
    3. If gripper is full and P sensed, drop object and then move in a random direction.

    This robot has no concept of anything in its world except P/not P, gripper full/empty, and "move in a random direction".

    Yet, externally, the effect of these rules is that the robot builds piles of objects [1].

    Attributing consciousness to an LLM is the equivalent of saying our robot *intends* to build piles of objects.

    1/3

    Triggering article: slowboring.com/p/nobody-knows-

    #LLMs #consciousness #robotics #theoryofmind

  5. There is a fundamental flaw in the idea that consciousness can be defined "functionally" (i.e. "it is what it does").

    Consciousness is a purely internal state - we infer it in others through communication, but it is fundamentally something someone experiences about themself, not something defined by how other people perceive them.

    Because it is an internally defined property, it *cannot* be defined on the basis of "what it does". It must be defined, at least in part, on the basis of "what it knows".

    To take a simple example from robotics:
    I have a robot with one gripper and two sensors that moves through its environment. One sensor (A) tells the robot whether its gripper is full or empty. The other sensor (B) tells the robot whether or not it is in the presence of something its gripper can pick up (an object, P).

    The robot has three rules.
    1. If no P, move in a random direction.
    2. If gripper is empty and P sensed, pick up object and then move in a random direction.
    3. If gripper is full and P sensed, drop object and then move in a random direction.

    This robot has no concept of anything in its world except P/not P, gripper full/empty, and "move in a random direction".

    Yet, externally, the effect of these rules is that the robot builds piles of objects [1].

    Attributing consciousness to an LLM is the equivalent of saying our robot *intends* to build piles of objects.

    1/3

    Triggering article: slowboring.com/p/nobody-knows-

    #LLMs #consciousness #robotics #theoryofmind

  6. Joan den ostiralean, Raymundo Báez Mendoza (Georg August Universität Göttingen, Alemania) izan genuen Achucarron, portaera sozialaren eta Theory of Mind delakoaren oinarri neuronalak aztertzen dituen mintegi batean. Eskerrik asko zure ikerketa gurekin partekatzeagatik! 👏

    #AchucarroSeminars #Neuroscience #SocialCognition #TheoryOfMind

  7. Joan den ostiralean, Raymundo Báez Mendoza (Georg August Universität Göttingen, Alemania) izan genuen Achucarron, portaera sozialaren eta Theory of Mind delakoaren oinarri neuronalak aztertzen dituen mintegi batean. Eskerrik asko zure ikerketa gurekin partekatzeagatik! 👏

    #AchucarroSeminars #Neuroscience #SocialCognition #TheoryOfMind

  8. Joan den ostiralean, Raymundo Báez Mendoza (Georg August Universität Göttingen, Alemania) izan genuen Achucarron, portaera sozialaren eta Theory of Mind delakoaren oinarri neuronalak aztertzen dituen mintegi batean. Eskerrik asko zure ikerketa gurekin partekatzeagatik! 👏

    #AchucarroSeminars #Neuroscience #SocialCognition #TheoryOfMind

  9. Joan den ostiralean, Raymundo Báez Mendoza (Georg August Universität Göttingen, Alemania) izan genuen Achucarron, portaera sozialaren eta Theory of Mind delakoaren oinarri neuronalak aztertzen dituen mintegi batean. Eskerrik asko zure ikerketa gurekin partekatzeagatik! 👏

  10. Is empathy political?
    A thread on autistic empathy.

    A still-quite-popular belief about autistic people is that we lack empathy.

    I think this is faulty logic.
    Here's why:

    A thread 🧵

    1/10

    #ActuallyAutistic #Neurodivergent
    #DoubleEmpathy #TheoryOfMind

  11. Is empathy political?
    A thread on autistic empathy.

    A still-quite-popular belief about autistic people is that we lack empathy.

    I think this is faulty logic.
    Here's why:

    A thread 🧵

    1/10

    #ActuallyAutistic #Neurodivergent
    #DoubleEmpathy #TheoryOfMind

  12. Is empathy political?
    A thread on autistic empathy.

    A still-quite-popular belief about autistic people is that we lack empathy.

    I think this is faulty logic.
    Here's why:

    A thread 🧵

    1/10

    #ActuallyAutistic #Neurodivergent
    #DoubleEmpathy #TheoryOfMind

  13. Is empathy political?
    A thread on autistic empathy.

    A still-quite-popular belief about autistic people is that we lack empathy.

    I think this is faulty logic.
    Here's why:

    A thread 🧵

    1/10


  14. Is empathy political?
    A thread on autistic empathy.

    A still-quite-popular belief about autistic people is that we lack empathy.

    I think this is faulty logic.
    Here's why:

    A thread 🧵

    1/10

    #ActuallyAutistic #Neurodivergent
    #DoubleEmpathy #TheoryOfMind

  15. Most people assume everyone else thinks like them. They don’t. And your brain knows this - but only from around age 4. #Psychology #CognitiveScience #TheoryOfMind #Neuroscience #MentalHealth

  16. Most people assume everyone else thinks like them. They don’t. And your brain knows this - but only from around age 4. #Psychology #CognitiveScience #TheoryOfMind #Neuroscience #MentalHealth

  17. Most people assume everyone else thinks like them. They don’t. And your brain knows this - but only from around age 4. #Psychology #CognitiveScience #TheoryOfMind #Neuroscience #MentalHealth

  18. Most people assume everyone else thinks like them. They don’t. And your brain knows this - but only from around age 4. #Psychology #CognitiveScience #TheoryOfMind #Neuroscience #MentalHealth

  19. Most people assume everyone else thinks like them. They don’t. And your brain knows this - but only from around age 4. #Psychology #CognitiveScience #TheoryOfMind #Neuroscience #MentalHealth

  20. @ngate It's like the AI, not being alive and having no Free Will, won't behave like a human being should.....

    #GenAI #AI #FreeWill #TheoryOfMind

  21. @ngate It's like the AI, not being alive and having no Free Will, won't behave like a human being should.....

    #GenAI #AI #FreeWill #TheoryOfMind

  22. @ngate It's like the AI, not being alive and having no Free Will, won't behave like a human being should.....

    #GenAI #AI #FreeWill #TheoryOfMind

  23. @ngate It's like the AI, not being alive and having no Free Will, won't behave like a human being should.....

    #GenAI #AI #FreeWill #TheoryOfMind

  24. @ngate It's like the AI, not being alive and having no Free Will, won't behave like a human being should.....

    #GenAI #AI #FreeWill #TheoryOfMind

  25. Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

    medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01

    In one of the fictional scenarios given to participants, Janet tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

    ⬇️

    #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

  26. Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

    medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01

    In one of the fictional scenarios given to participants, Janet tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

    ⬇️

    #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

  27. Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

    medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01

    In one of the fictional scenarios given to participants, Janet tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

    ⬇️

    #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

  28. Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

    medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01

    In one of the fictional scenarios given to participants, Janet tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

    ⬇️

  29. Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

    medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01

    In one of the fictional scenarios given to participants, Janet tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

    ⬇️

    #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

  30. The phrase I see you is the canonical ritual of a perceptual collapse. Theory of Mind (ToM), the dominant human interface for social understanding, functions not as a window into others but as an Epistemic Mirror that projects the observer's own operational logic.
    #TheoryOfMind #Catch22 #DoubleBind #Aphantasia #AIBias open.substack.com/pub/cristina

  31. Scientists Might Be Looking for Consciousness in the Wrong Part of the Brain

    What gives rise to human consciousness? Are some parts of the brain more important than others? Scientists began…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Health #consciousness #Neuroscience #theoryofmind
    newsbeep.com/us/190271/

  32. Scientists Might Be Looking for Consciousness in the Wrong Part of the Brain

    What gives rise to human consciousness? Are some parts of the brain more important than others? Scientists began…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Health #consciousness #Neuroscience #theoryofmind
    newsbeep.com/us/190271/

  33. Freue mich, dass auf dem #Blogpost der m.E. wichtige Dialog über die menschliche #Religionspsychologie und #KI begonnen hat.

    Denn seit Jahrzehntausenden (mindestens) gehen Menschen parasoziale Beziehungen mit Entitäten wie Gestirnen, Bäumen, Bergen, später Skulpturen ein, in die sie #Geist hineinlesen. Die #Psychologie nennt diese starke Tendenz #TheoryofMind (TOM) , deutsch #Mentalisierung. Mensch-KI-Beziehungen werden keine Ausnahmen bleiben, sondern zur Regel werden. scilogs.spektrum.de/natur-des-

  34. Freue mich, dass auf dem #Blogpost der m.E. wichtige Dialog über die menschliche #Religionspsychologie und #KI begonnen hat.

    Denn seit Jahrzehntausenden (mindestens) gehen Menschen parasoziale Beziehungen mit Entitäten wie Gestirnen, Bäumen, Bergen, später Skulpturen ein, in die sie #Geist hineinlesen. Die #Psychologie nennt diese starke Tendenz #TheoryofMind (TOM) , deutsch #Mentalisierung. Mensch-KI-Beziehungen werden keine Ausnahmen bleiben, sondern zur Regel werden. scilogs.spektrum.de/natur-des-

  35. Freue mich, dass auf dem #Blogpost der m.E. wichtige Dialog über die menschliche #Religionspsychologie und #KI begonnen hat.

    Denn seit Jahrzehntausenden (mindestens) gehen Menschen parasoziale Beziehungen mit Entitäten wie Gestirnen, Bäumen, Bergen, später Skulpturen ein, in die sie #Geist hineinlesen. Die #Psychologie nennt diese starke Tendenz #TheoryofMind (TOM) , deutsch #Mentalisierung. Mensch-KI-Beziehungen werden keine Ausnahmen bleiben, sondern zur Regel werden. scilogs.spektrum.de/natur-des-

  36. Freue mich, dass auf dem #Blogpost der m.E. wichtige Dialog über die menschliche #Religionspsychologie und #KI begonnen hat.

    Denn seit Jahrzehntausenden (mindestens) gehen Menschen parasoziale Beziehungen mit Entitäten wie Gestirnen, Bäumen, Bergen, später Skulpturen ein, in die sie #Geist hineinlesen. Die #Psychologie nennt diese starke Tendenz #TheoryofMind (TOM) , deutsch #Mentalisierung. Mensch-KI-Beziehungen werden keine Ausnahmen bleiben, sondern zur Regel werden. scilogs.spektrum.de/natur-des-

  37. Freue mich, dass auf dem #Blogpost der m.E. wichtige Dialog über die menschliche #Religionspsychologie und #KI begonnen hat.

    Denn seit Jahrzehntausenden (mindestens) gehen Menschen parasoziale Beziehungen mit Entitäten wie Gestirnen, Bäumen, Bergen, später Skulpturen ein, in die sie #Geist hineinlesen. Die #Psychologie nennt diese starke Tendenz #TheoryofMind (TOM) , deutsch #Mentalisierung. Mensch-KI-Beziehungen werden keine Ausnahmen bleiben, sondern zur Regel werden. scilogs.spektrum.de/natur-des-

  38. Was braucht ein guter Game-Pitch? – Podcast E115

    Wer ein Spiel entwickeln möchte, muss anderen erklären, worum es geht. Spätestens, wenn man Geld braucht. Aber worauf achtet ein Publisher und worauf kommt es bei einem guten Game-Pitch an? Darüber haben wir mit Stefan Marcinek, CEO bei Assemble Entertainment, live auf den German Dev Days 2025 gesprochen.

    Bild: German Dev Days 2025

    Zu Gast

    Hosts

    • Benjamin Strobel, Nicolas Hoberg, Jessica Kathmann | Behind the Screens

    Unter Mitarbeit von

    • Alexander Franz (Website)

    Transkript

    Transkript für Folge 115 herunterladen

    Psychologie und Konzepte

    Weitere Links

    In eigener Sache

    Wenn euch die Folge gefallen hat, hinterlasst uns doch eine gute Bewertung bei Apple und Spotify oder abonniert uns bei Amazon Music oder Audible. All das hilft uns dabei, auf den Plattformen sichtbarerer zu werden.

    Wenn ihr uns finanziell unterstützen möchtet, könnt ihr das auf Steady tun – jeder Beitrag hilft uns, Behind the Screens weiter wachsen zu lassen.

    Wir freuen uns über Feedback. Schreibt uns doch einen Kommentar unter diesen Post oder meldet euch via BlueSky oder LinkedIn. Noch besser: Diskutiert mit uns auf Discord!

    #CognitiveLoad #GamePitch #HaloEffekt #Isoluminanz #MentalesModell #Pitch #Pitchen #Pitching #ProbatorischeSitzungen #Psychotherapie #Publisher #TheoryOfMind