#socialscoring — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #socialscoring, aggregated by home.social.
-
Die #TechElite des SiliconValley träumt von einer Zukunft jenseits der Demokratie – und die ideologischen Wurzeln reichen von #AynRand über #apokalyptischeVisionen bis hin zum „DarkEnlightenment".
Was das mit SocialScoring, #ElonMusk und der neuen #TrumpAdministration zu tun hat, habe ich auf #LinkedIn zusammengefasst.
#Technofaschismus #SiliconValley #SocialScoring #Demokratie #KI #DarkEnlightenment
-
Die #TechElite des SiliconValley träumt von einer Zukunft jenseits der Demokratie – und die ideologischen Wurzeln reichen von #AynRand über #apokalyptischeVisionen bis hin zum „DarkEnlightenment".
Was das mit SocialScoring, #ElonMusk und der neuen #TrumpAdministration zu tun hat, habe ich auf #LinkedIn zusammengefasst.
#Technofaschismus #SiliconValley #SocialScoring #Demokratie #KI #DarkEnlightenment
-
⛵ Auftakt der neuen Staffel der #Podcast-Serie «Digitale Piraten» mit TA-SWISS
🧮 Martina von Arx unterhält sich in der ersten Folge mit Dominik Neuffer von GreenITSolutions über Social-Scoring-Systeme, die laufende Studie von TA-SWISS.
👂 Jetzt reinhören: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYA5QldYnys
-
Ihr interessiert Euch vielleicht #nicht sehr für Politik
... aber die #Politik interessiert sich beim Thema #Überwachung & #SocialScoring sehr für Euch.
-
Surveillance Capitalism: The Truth Behind Face Recognition
Tech companies sell face recognition as progress. However, the intersection of face recognition and privacy raises crucial concerns. They promise convenience: unlock your phone without touching it, breeze through airport gates without fumbling for documents, move through a stadium without waiting in line. Each claim suggests efficiency and safety.
Yet the face is not a simple key. It carries memory, dignity, and presence. When corporations translate it into data, they strip it of context and treat it as another commodity.
Therefore, the paradox is sharp: in the age of surveillance capitalism, how can we equate face recognition with privacy?
Convenience or Control?
Defenders often argue that our faces are already public. Strangers see them daily. Cameras record them in streets and malls. So why should one more scan matter?
The difference lies in permanence. A stranger’s glance fades. An algorithmic capture endures. Once systems record your face, they can store, search, and link it across contexts. This affects the balance between face recognition and privacy in daily life.
As a result, privacy does not simply mean no one sees you. Instead, it means you control how you are known. Face recognition shifts that control from the individual to the system. That’s why privacy matters more than ever in the digital age.
The Machinery of Surveillance Capitalism
Shoshana Zuboff described surveillance capitalism as the commodification of human experience. Companies no longer just sell products; they sell predictions of what we will do. For context on emerging regulatory efforts, see the EU’s guide on biometric mass surveillance.
Face recognition feeds this system. For example, algorithms measure micro-expressions to gauge mood. Cameras track gaze to predict purchase intent. Networks follow movement patterns to infer health. Together, these fragments give corporations and governments the power to predict and influence behavior.
Consequently, what looks like “security” hides a trade in human identity. The interaction between face recognition and privacy becomes more complex as companies and states turn presence into raw material for commerce and control.
From Facial Recognition to Social Scoring
Face recognition already raises alarms. However, social scoring escalates them. Some governments now combine biometric data with behavioral records. They assign citizens scores that dictate whether they can travel, secure loans, or even post online.
Western societies run early versions of the same logic. For instance, credit ratings define access to finance. Insurance premiums tie to wearable devices. Predictive policing builds on location history. These systems normalize the idea that algorithms can rank human worth.
Therefore, the threat does not stop at being seen. It deepens when systems rank and judge. Issues of privacy and recognition interconnect, and privacy no longer stands as a right; it shrinks into a privilege granted to the compliant.
Why Face Recognition Threatens Liberal Values and Human Dignity
Scholars warn that facial recognition further entrenches discrimination and undermines civil liberties. For example, a National Academies report shows how advances in the technology have outpaced regulation, amplifying inequities and threatening rights.
Classical liberalism begins with a simple truth: individuals are ends in themselves. Rights precede the state. They do not hinge on conformity.
When face recognition becomes the default ID system, liberal values weaken. Speaking, traveling, or dissenting starts to feel conditional. Dignity erodes when you need a system’s permission to exist in public.
Ironically, tools sold as protection against crime or fraud can instead silence difference. Moreover, freedom rarely vanishes in one blow. It slips away in small trades of convenience for control, affecting recognition and privacy together.
Stoic Lessons for a Surveillance Age
The Stoics taught that freedom starts with perception. We cannot erase surveillance systems, but we can choose how we respond.
That choice is not passive resignation. Rather, it demands clarity. Privacy is not secrecy but sovereignty. Defending it means drawing boundaries: rejecting biometric systems without consent, backing regulations that limit data permanence, and supporting decentralized technologies where people volunteer identity instead of having it extracted.
In this way, a stoic citizen lives without fear of being ranked yet refuses to accept ranking as the measure of human worth, also balancing between the stakes of face recognition and privacy.
Toward a Future Beyond Facial Recognition Surveillance
Face recognition and privacy can coexist, but only if we impose strict rules:
- Consent: people must choose to enroll, never be scanned without notice.
- Transparency: organizations must disclose who holds the data, how long, and why.
- Boundaries: liberal societies must ban emotional inference and behavioral prediction.
- Alternatives: decentralized identifiers (DIDs) and privacy-preserving authentication can build trust without reducing the face to a token.
Otherwise, face recognition and social scoring merge into a cycle of surveillance. The promise of security mutates into a regime of control. The EU AI Act’s Article 5 already bans emotion interference and untargeted face scraping.
Closing Thoughts on Facial Recognition and Privacy
The face is our first language. Before words, we smiled, frowned, and showed fear. When systems digitize our identities without limits, there is a significant impact on both data and privacy.
Surveillance capitalism urges us to normalize the reduction of identity into currency. Furthermore, social scoring tempts us to believe compliance equals virtue.
If privacy is to endure, we must resist. We must refuse to let the human face become a barcode. We must refuse to accept a number in place of dignity. Finally, we must refuse to surrender sovereignty for convenience.
In the age of surveillance, privacy survives only when we defend it.
#Biometrics #faceRecognition #humanDignity #liberalism #modernStoicism #Privacy #socialScoring #surveillanceCapitalism
-
Surveillance Capitalism: The Truth Behind Face Recognition
Tech companies sell face recognition as progress. However, the intersection of face recognition and privacy raises crucial concerns. They promise convenience: unlock your phone without touching it, breeze through airport gates without fumbling for documents, move through a stadium without waiting in line. Each claim suggests efficiency and safety.
Yet the face is not a simple key. It carries memory, dignity, and presence. When corporations translate it into data, they strip it of context and treat it as another commodity.
Therefore, the paradox is sharp: in the age of surveillance capitalism, how can we equate face recognition with privacy?
Convenience or Control?
Defenders often argue that our faces are already public. Strangers see them daily. Cameras record them in streets and malls. So why should one more scan matter?
The difference lies in permanence. A stranger’s glance fades. An algorithmic capture endures. Once systems record your face, they can store, search, and link it across contexts. This affects the balance between face recognition and privacy in daily life.
As a result, privacy does not simply mean no one sees you. Instead, it means you control how you are known. Face recognition shifts that control from the individual to the system. That’s why privacy matters more than ever in the digital age.
The Machinery of Surveillance Capitalism
Shoshana Zuboff described surveillance capitalism as the commodification of human experience. Companies no longer just sell products; they sell predictions of what we will do. For context on emerging regulatory efforts, see the EU’s guide on biometric mass surveillance.
Face recognition feeds this system. For example, algorithms measure micro-expressions to gauge mood. Cameras track gaze to predict purchase intent. Networks follow movement patterns to infer health. Together, these fragments give corporations and governments the power to predict and influence behavior.
Consequently, what looks like “security” hides a trade in human identity. The interaction between face recognition and privacy becomes more complex as companies and states turn presence into raw material for commerce and control.
From Facial Recognition to Social Scoring
Face recognition already raises alarms. However, social scoring escalates them. Some governments now combine biometric data with behavioral records. They assign citizens scores that dictate whether they can travel, secure loans, or even post online.
Western societies run early versions of the same logic. For instance, credit ratings define access to finance. Insurance premiums tie to wearable devices. Predictive policing builds on location history. These systems normalize the idea that algorithms can rank human worth.
Therefore, the threat does not stop at being seen. It deepens when systems rank and judge. Issues of privacy and recognition interconnect, and privacy no longer stands as a right; it shrinks into a privilege granted to the compliant.
Why Face Recognition Threatens Liberal Values and Human Dignity
Scholars warn that facial recognition further entrenches discrimination and undermines civil liberties. For example, a National Academies report shows how advances in the technology have outpaced regulation, amplifying inequities and threatening rights.
Classical liberalism begins with a simple truth: individuals are ends in themselves. Rights precede the state. They do not hinge on conformity.
When face recognition becomes the default ID system, liberal values weaken. Speaking, traveling, or dissenting starts to feel conditional. Dignity erodes when you need a system’s permission to exist in public.
Ironically, tools sold as protection against crime or fraud can instead silence difference. Moreover, freedom rarely vanishes in one blow. It slips away in small trades of convenience for control, affecting recognition and privacy together.
Stoic Lessons for a Surveillance Age
The Stoics taught that freedom starts with perception. We cannot erase surveillance systems, but we can choose how we respond.
That choice is not passive resignation. Rather, it demands clarity. Privacy is not secrecy but sovereignty. Defending it means drawing boundaries: rejecting biometric systems without consent, backing regulations that limit data permanence, and supporting decentralized technologies where people volunteer identity instead of having it extracted.
In this way, a stoic citizen lives without fear of being ranked yet refuses to accept ranking as the measure of human worth, also balancing between the stakes of face recognition and privacy.
Toward a Future Beyond Facial Recognition Surveillance
Face recognition and privacy can coexist, but only if we impose strict rules:
- Consent: people must choose to enroll, never be scanned without notice.
- Transparency: organizations must disclose who holds the data, how long, and why.
- Boundaries: liberal societies must ban emotional inference and behavioral prediction.
- Alternatives: decentralized identifiers (DIDs) and privacy-preserving authentication can build trust without reducing the face to a token.
Otherwise, face recognition and social scoring merge into a cycle of surveillance. The promise of security mutates into a regime of control. The EU AI Act’s Article 5 already bans emotion interference and untargeted face scraping.
Closing Thoughts on Facial Recognition and Privacy
The face is our first language. Before words, we smiled, frowned, and showed fear. When systems digitize our identities without limits, there is a significant impact on both data and privacy.
Surveillance capitalism urges us to normalize the reduction of identity into currency. Furthermore, social scoring tempts us to believe compliance equals virtue.
If privacy is to endure, we must resist. We must refuse to let the human face become a barcode. We must refuse to accept a number in place of dignity. Finally, we must refuse to surrender sovereignty for convenience.
In the age of surveillance, privacy survives only when we defend it.
#Biometrics #faceRecognition #humanDignity #liberalism #modernStoicism #Privacy #socialScoring #surveillanceCapitalism
-
Surveillance Capitalism: The Truth Behind Face Recognition
Tech companies sell face recognition as progress. However, the intersection of face recognition and privacy raises crucial concerns. They promise convenience: unlock your phone without touching it, breeze through airport gates without fumbling for documents, move through a stadium without waiting in line. Each claim suggests efficiency and safety.
Yet the face is not a simple key. It carries memory, dignity, and presence. When corporations translate it into data, they strip it of context and treat it as another commodity.
Therefore, the paradox is sharp: in the age of surveillance capitalism, how can we equate face recognition with privacy?
Convenience or Control?
Defenders often argue that our faces are already public. Strangers see them daily. Cameras record them in streets and malls. So why should one more scan matter?
The difference lies in permanence. A stranger’s glance fades. An algorithmic capture endures. Once systems record your face, they can store, search, and link it across contexts. This affects the balance between face recognition and privacy in daily life.
As a result, privacy does not simply mean no one sees you. Instead, it means you control how you are known. Face recognition shifts that control from the individual to the system. That’s why privacy matters more than ever in the digital age.
The Machinery of Surveillance Capitalism
Shoshana Zuboff described surveillance capitalism as the commodification of human experience. Companies no longer just sell products; they sell predictions of what we will do. For context on emerging regulatory efforts, see the EU’s guide on biometric mass surveillance.
Face recognition feeds this system. For example, algorithms measure micro-expressions to gauge mood. Cameras track gaze to predict purchase intent. Networks follow movement patterns to infer health. Together, these fragments give corporations and governments the power to predict and influence behavior.
Consequently, what looks like “security” hides a trade in human identity. The interaction between face recognition and privacy becomes more complex as companies and states turn presence into raw material for commerce and control.
From Facial Recognition to Social Scoring
Face recognition already raises alarms. However, social scoring escalates them. Some governments now combine biometric data with behavioral records. They assign citizens scores that dictate whether they can travel, secure loans, or even post online.
Western societies run early versions of the same logic. For instance, credit ratings define access to finance. Insurance premiums tie to wearable devices. Predictive policing builds on location history. These systems normalize the idea that algorithms can rank human worth.
Therefore, the threat does not stop at being seen. It deepens when systems rank and judge. Issues of privacy and recognition interconnect, and privacy no longer stands as a right; it shrinks into a privilege granted to the compliant.
Why Face Recognition Threatens Liberal Values and Human Dignity
Scholars warn that facial recognition further entrenches discrimination and undermines civil liberties. For example, a National Academies report shows how advances in the technology have outpaced regulation, amplifying inequities and threatening rights.
Classical liberalism begins with a simple truth: individuals are ends in themselves. Rights precede the state. They do not hinge on conformity.
When face recognition becomes the default ID system, liberal values weaken. Speaking, traveling, or dissenting starts to feel conditional. Dignity erodes when you need a system’s permission to exist in public.
Ironically, tools sold as protection against crime or fraud can instead silence difference. Moreover, freedom rarely vanishes in one blow. It slips away in small trades of convenience for control, affecting recognition and privacy together.
Stoic Lessons for a Surveillance Age
The Stoics taught that freedom starts with perception. We cannot erase surveillance systems, but we can choose how we respond.
That choice is not passive resignation. Rather, it demands clarity. Privacy is not secrecy but sovereignty. Defending it means drawing boundaries: rejecting biometric systems without consent, backing regulations that limit data permanence, and supporting decentralized technologies where people volunteer identity instead of having it extracted.
In this way, a stoic citizen lives without fear of being ranked yet refuses to accept ranking as the measure of human worth, also balancing between the stakes of face recognition and privacy.
Toward a Future Beyond Facial Recognition Surveillance
Face recognition and privacy can coexist, but only if we impose strict rules:
- Consent: people must choose to enroll, never be scanned without notice.
- Transparency: organizations must disclose who holds the data, how long, and why.
- Boundaries: liberal societies must ban emotional inference and behavioral prediction.
- Alternatives: decentralized identifiers (DIDs) and privacy-preserving authentication can build trust without reducing the face to a token.
Otherwise, face recognition and social scoring merge into a cycle of surveillance. The promise of security mutates into a regime of control. The EU AI Act’s Article 5 already bans emotion interference and untargeted face scraping.
Closing Thoughts on Facial Recognition and Privacy
The face is our first language. Before words, we smiled, frowned, and showed fear. When systems digitize our identities without limits, there is a significant impact on both data and privacy.
Surveillance capitalism urges us to normalize the reduction of identity into currency. Furthermore, social scoring tempts us to believe compliance equals virtue.
If privacy is to endure, we must resist. We must refuse to let the human face become a barcode. We must refuse to accept a number in place of dignity. Finally, we must refuse to surrender sovereignty for convenience.
In the age of surveillance, privacy survives only when we defend it.
#Biometrics #faceRecognition #humanDignity #liberalism #modernStoicism #Privacy #socialScoring #surveillanceCapitalism
-
Dieses konsequente Verhindern von #ZeroKnowledgeProof in der #euwallet / #SchlandID lässt für mich leider nur einen Schluss zu ... und der schmerzt meiner Seeele
#TechFashism with #SocialScoring jetzt bald auch in der EU?
-
Dieses konsequente Verhindern von #ZeroKnowledgeProof in der #euwallet / #SchlandID lässt für mich leider nur einen Schluss zu ... und der schmerzt meiner Seeele
#TechFashism with #SocialScoring jetzt bald auch in der EU?
-
Dieses konsequente Verhindern von #ZeroKnowledgeProof in der #euwallet / #SchlandID lässt für mich leider nur einen Schluss zu ... und der schmerzt meiner Seeele
#TechFashism with #SocialScoring jetzt bald auch in der EU?
-
Dieses konsequente Verhindern von #ZeroKnowledgeProof in der #euwallet / #SchlandID lässt für mich leider nur einen Schluss zu ... und der schmerzt meiner Seeele
#TechFashism with #SocialScoring jetzt bald auch in der EU?
-
Dieses konsequente Verhindern von #ZeroKnowledgeProof in der #euwallet / #SchlandID lässt für mich leider nur einen Schluss zu ... und der schmerzt meiner Seeele
#TechFashism with #SocialScoring jetzt bald auch in der EU?
-
⭐ Punkte für Kundentreue
oder
🚫 Strafpunkte für’s Missachten von Verkehrsregeln.Was genau sind «Social Scoring-Systeme»? Und wie grenzen sie sich von anderen Anreizsystemen ab, die ebenfalls mit grossen Datensätzen arbeiten?
Ein interdisziplinäres Projektteam untersucht das Thema im Auftrag von TA-SWISS und wagt sich an eine mögliche Eingrenzung.
Der Artikel von Benjamin von Wyl von Swissinfo gewährt einen Einblick in die laufenden Arbeiten.
-
#Europa mit #SocialScoring?
Die #USA würde es freuen & #Palantir ist ready
Grandiose #Doku -> Empfehung
-
So if you're *STILL* wondering why Europa having an #AI regulation in place is a *good* thing:
https://www.axios.com/2025/03/06/state-department-ai-revoke-foreign-student-visas-hamas
Yeah right, #SocialScoring in the worst imaginable way in God's own country. *sigh*
-
@sensiblequiet
Absolutely, our #privacy is constantly under attack by those who are supposed to be in charge of protecting it!@Impish4249
Love your new creation! 😍I agree, they are on top of their game; they #hack #government services for fun, but surely this will catch them!
This is only a risk for ordinary people; maybe they can use this wonderful data for #credit card ratings and potentially some good old #socialscoring? ❤️
-
The EU’s #AIAct prohibitions are now in effect! But gaps remain. Learn more: https://algorithmwatch.org/en/ai-act-prohibitions-february-2025/
🚫 Now banned in the EU: #ManipulativeAI, AI that exploits people's vulnerabilities, #SocialScoring, #Scraping of facial images on the internet, Live #FaceRecognition in Public Spaces. Others are partially banned, like #PredictivePolicing, #EmotionRecognition, and more.
-
#deepseek #socialscoring #china It is an initiative by the Chinese government to monitor and evaluate the behavior of citizens to assess their trustworthiness. The system aims to encourage positive social behavior by rewarding individuals with better social credit scores for actions such as honesty, compliance with the law, and social responsibility. This system is part of the broader effort to create a more harmonious and orderly society under the "Chinese Dream" framework.
-
The EU's #AIAct experts consultation on the definition of an AI system and on prohibited AI practices closed on Dec 11. But loopholes still threaten #FundamentalRights.
The #AIActCivilSociety and the #ProtectNotSurveil coalitions demand guidelines that ban #SocialScoring, #BiometricSurveillance, and other harmful practices. We call on the AI Office to ensure the upcoming guidelines will provide a fundamental rights-based enforcement of the AI Act.
👉 https://algorithmwatch.org/en/statement-commission-guidelines-ai-act/
-
The EU's #AIAct experts consultation on the definition of an AI system and on prohibited AI practices closed on Dec 11. But loopholes still threaten #FundamentalRights.
The #AIActCivilSociety and the #ProtectNotSurveil coalitions demand guidelines that ban #SocialScoring, #BiometricSurveillance, and other harmful practices. We call on the AI Office to ensure the upcoming guidelines will provide a fundamental rights-based enforcement of the AI Act.
👉 https://algorithmwatch.org/en/statement-commission-guidelines-ai-act/
-
The EU's #AIAct experts consultation on the definition of an AI system and on prohibited AI practices closed on Dec 11. But loopholes still threaten #FundamentalRights.
The #AIActCivilSociety and the #ProtectNotSurveil coalitions demand guidelines that ban #SocialScoring, #BiometricSurveillance, and other harmful practices. We call on the AI Office to ensure the upcoming guidelines will provide a fundamental rights-based enforcement of the AI Act.
👉 https://algorithmwatch.org/en/statement-commission-guidelines-ai-act/
-
The EU's #AIAct experts consultation on the definition of an AI system and on prohibited AI practices closed on Dec 11. But loopholes still threaten #FundamentalRights.
The #AIActCivilSociety and the #ProtectNotSurveil coalitions demand guidelines that ban #SocialScoring, #BiometricSurveillance, and other harmful practices. We call on the AI Office to ensure the upcoming guidelines will provide a fundamental rights-based enforcement of the AI Act.
👉 https://algorithmwatch.org/en/statement-commission-guidelines-ai-act/
-
The EU's #AIAct experts consultation on the definition of an AI system and on prohibited AI practices closed on Dec 11. But loopholes still threaten #FundamentalRights.
The #AIActCivilSociety and the #ProtectNotSurveil coalitions demand guidelines that ban #SocialScoring, #BiometricSurveillance, and other harmful practices. We call on the AI Office to ensure the upcoming guidelines will provide a fundamental rights-based enforcement of the AI Act.
👉 https://algorithmwatch.org/en/statement-commission-guidelines-ai-act/
-
💡 Unser aktueller Newsletter ist da:
👉 Social-Scoring-Systeme: Was zählt? - Einblick in die Studie
👉 Bonuspunkte für staatsbürgerliches Wohlverhalten - Interview mit Lorenz Hilty
👉 Sprachmodelle und Kompetenzverschiebungen - Neue Studienausschreibung
👉 Wie reimt sich KI auf Demokratie?
👉 Was uns KI und Co. über menschliche Kreativität lehren - Save the date «Intelligente Kunst»: 26. Februar 2025, 18.00 Uhr, HeK Basel
https://www.ta-swiss.ch/app/uploads/2024/12/de-Newsletter-3_24-TA-SWISS_web.pdf
-
Ich belausche gerade ein Gespräch in der Bahn: Bei der Bauplatzvergabe irgendwo im Schwäbischen wird diese an ein Social Scoring gebunden. Man wird mit Hilfe eines Punkte-Systems bewertet. Single oder Familie? Kinder? Ehrenamtlich engagiert? usw. Personen mit dem höchstem Punktwert werden m Bewerbungsverfahren um Bauplätze bevorzugt. #socialscoring
-
#SocialScoring in #Frankreich: 15 zivilgesellschaftliche Gruppen klagen gegen stigmatisierenden #Sozialhilfe-Algorithmus zur "sozialen Bewertung" https://www.labournet.de/?p=223883
-
Ein Algorithmus entscheidet in #Frankreich darüber mit, ob Familien vermeintlich zu viel Sozialhilfe erhalten. NGOs kritisieren das System als diskriminierend, weil es vor allem ärmere Menschen ins Visier nehme. Jetzt klagen sie vor Gericht.....
https://netzpolitik.org/2024/social-scoring-klage-gegen-sozialhilfe-algorithmus-in-frankreich/
#SocialScoring #Daten #Datenschutz #Diskriminierung #Netzpolitik
-
Auch wenn #Fefe hier vermutlich nicht mit liest, sollte man ihn darüber aufklären, dass das chinesische #SocialScoring für Menschen nie über die Erprobung hinaus gekommen und Geschichte ist!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System
Wie grotesk, wenn westliche Monopolkonzerne die totalitäre Dystopie privatwirtschaftlich umsetzen würden, die westliche Thinktanks China seit Jahren (demagogisch) unterstellen?
In China gibt es aber so was für Unternehmen mit asozialen Geschäftspraktiken ..
-
Zürcher Piraten fordern mit Volksinitiative "digitale Integrität" - inside-it.ch https://www.inside-it.ch/zuercher-piraten-fordern-mit-volksinitiative-digitale-integritaet-20240819 #Datenschutz #privacy #surveillance #Überwachung #Digitalisierung #digitalization #SocialScoring #ArtificialIntelligence #FacialRecognition #Gesichtserkennung #Biometrie #biometrics #Volksinitiative
-
#KI-Verordnung tritt in Kraft
"Unter anderem gilt das für das grundsätzliche Verbot biometrischer #Echtzeit-#Fernüberwachungssysteme in öffentlichen Räumen in Zwecke der #Strafverfolgung. Des Weiteren wird das #SocialScoring verboten. Durch Social Scoring wird das Verhalten KI-basiert bewertet und daran soziale Benachteiligungen geknüpft, wie den Ausschluss öffentlicher Leistungen..."
https://www.behoerden-spiegel.de/2024/08/01/ki-verordnung-tritt-in-kraft/
-
Today the #AIAct came into force in #EU and now I’m wondering whether a type of #SpamFilter (Minimal Risk / no obligations) can be considered #SocialScoring (Unacceptable Risk).
#AIhttps://ec.social-network.europa.eu/@EUCommission/112886250482740387
-
Ebenfalls eine tolle Aussage war (paraphrasiert): man kann sich nicht allen Scoring-Games verschließen. Die große Freiheit besteht allerdings, dass man sich aussuchen kann, bei welchen Scoring-Games aus einem großen Pool von Scoring-Games man mitmacht und bei welchen nicht.
Anmerkung meinerseits: das würde allerdings erfordern, dass die Menschen die jeweiligen Auswirkungen verstehen, was sie nicht mal ansatzweise tun, wie man anhand sehr vieler Beispiele sieht. 🤷
-
#Podcast: #ScienceFiction trifft auf Realität - #SocialScoring – werden wir ständig bewertet?
https://podcastaddict.com/science-fiction-trifft-auf-realitat/episode/177608098
Das Überraschende für mich war nicht so sehr, dass #China weniger Scoring haben, als wir glauben, sondern, dass wir in unserer Gesellschaft so viel mehr Scoring haben, als uns bewusst ist. Und dass Einiges davon gut und nützlich ist. 😯🤔
-
Ich bin vor ein paar Tagen auf «QualityLand» von Marc-Uwe Kling aus 2017(!) gestossen. Und war erstaunt, wie viele Themen es angeht, die uns aktuell beschäftigen (#KI, Marktdominanz, Cyberangriffe/-krieg, #Datenschutz, #SocialScoring, …).
Und das nicht als Lehrbuch, sondern als packende Story. Die unterhaltsamste, kurzweiligste und lehrreichste Dystopie, die ich je gelesen habe.
1/2
https://marcel-waldvogel.ch/2024/06/12/qualityland-sagt-die-gegenwart-voraus-und-erklaert-sie/ -
Die #NZZ hat die #Piratenpartei zitiert! Wow, es gibt noch grünen, äh, orangen Schnee!
Im Kanton #Zürich läuft die Unterschriftensammlung für die Initiative zur Digitalen Integrität. Hier erfahrt ihr mehr zum #Datenschutz etc. als #Grundrecht|e für das #Digitalzeitalter:
💡+✒️: https://digitale-integritaet.ch/
📰: https://www.nzz.ch/zuerich/datenschutzbedenken-birmensdorf-stoppt-tracking-im-hort-ld.1833735
#Chatkontrolle #Gesichtserkennung #SocialScoring -
Die #NZZ hat die #Piratenpartei zitiert! Wow, es gibt noch grünen, äh, orangen Schnee!
Im Kanton #Zürich läuft die Unterschriftensammlung für die Initiative zur Digitalen Integrität. Hier erfahrt ihr mehr zum #Datenschutz etc. als #Grundrecht|e für das #Digitalzeitalter:
💡+✒️: https://digitale-integritaet.ch/
📰: https://www.nzz.ch/zuerich/datenschutzbedenken-birmensdorf-stoppt-tracking-im-hort-ld.1833735
#Chatkontrolle #Gesichtserkennung #SocialScoring -
Die #NZZ hat die #Piratenpartei zitiert! Wow, es gibt noch grünen, äh, orangen Schnee!
Im Kanton #Zürich läuft die Unterschriftensammlung für die Initiative zur Digitalen Integrität. Hier erfahrt ihr mehr zum #Datenschutz etc. als #Grundrecht|e für das #Digitalzeitalter:
💡+✒️: https://digitale-integritaet.ch/
📰: https://www.nzz.ch/zuerich/datenschutzbedenken-birmensdorf-stoppt-tracking-im-hort-ld.1833735
#Chatkontrolle #Gesichtserkennung #SocialScoring -
Die #NZZ hat die #Piratenpartei zitiert! Wow, es gibt noch grünen, äh, orangen Schnee!
Im Kanton #Zürich läuft die Unterschriftensammlung für die Initiative zur Digitalen Integrität. Hier erfahrt ihr mehr zum #Datenschutz etc. als #Grundrecht|e für das #Digitalzeitalter:
💡+✒️: https://digitale-integritaet.ch/
📰: https://www.nzz.ch/zuerich/datenschutzbedenken-birmensdorf-stoppt-tracking-im-hort-ld.1833735
#Chatkontrolle #Gesichtserkennung #SocialScoring -
Die #NZZ hat die #Piratenpartei zitiert! Wow, es gibt noch grünen, äh, orangen Schnee!
Im Kanton #Zürich läuft die Unterschriftensammlung für die Initiative zur Digitalen Integrität. Hier erfahrt ihr mehr zum #Datenschutz etc. als #Grundrecht|e für das #Digitalzeitalter:
💡+✒️: https://digitale-integritaet.ch/
📰: https://www.nzz.ch/zuerich/datenschutzbedenken-birmensdorf-stoppt-tracking-im-hort-ld.1833735
#Chatkontrolle #Gesichtserkennung #SocialScoring -
Heute ist es soweit! 20:30 läuft die Doku Total Trust im #City46 in #Bremen! Wir sind dabei und freuen uns auf eine anschließende Diskussion!
https://www.city46.de/programm/dezember-2023/globales-handeln#c22116
Saskia Kress kann bahnbedingt leider doch nicht anwesend sein, aber wir versuchen es mit einer Video-Live-Schaltung!
#china #socialScoring #überwachung #TotalTrust
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.08019/8.80973
https://fomobremen.info/events/5c8fd864-784b-4d8f-9bb7-bccbca5f1b63 -
Am 02.12. läuft im Kino 46 um 20:30 die Doku "Total Trust". Wir sind mit dabei und laden danach zusammen mit Saskia Kress, einer der Produzent*innen, die Zuschauer*innen zur Diskussion ein. 🎞️ 🍿 #china #überwachung #SocialScoring https://fomobremen.info/events/5c8fd864-784b-4d8f-9bb7-bccbca5f1b63
-
Der Digitalpolitische Wochenrückblick. Mehr Infos/Quellen und VIELE weitere Themen: https://piratenpartei.ch/digitalpolitische-woche/
Mit Beiträgen von/mit:
[email protected]
@Mimykri #SocialScoring #Sozialkreditsysteme #eID #eIDNEIN #Überwachung #Gesichtserkennung #hack #hacking #eHealth -
📣 Veranstaltungshinweis
Heute Abend um 18 Uhr findet im Studio Filmtheater in Kiel eine Sondervorstellung von "Total Trust" statt mit anschließender Diskussion mit der Produzentin Saskia Kress von Piffl Medien [und uns].
🌐 https://www.studio-filmtheater.de/film/total-trust
#️⃣ #Kino #Cinema #China #Kiel #TotalTrust #uberwachung #surveillance #Orwell #BigData #KI #BigBrother #SocialScoring
-
Am 02.12. gibt es eine weitere Aktion: Im Kino 46 läuft um 20:30 die Doku "Total Trust". Danach ist Zeit für eine Diskussion zusammen mit Saskia Kress, einer der Produzent*innen. 🎞️ 🍿 #china #überwachung #SocialScoring https://fomobremen.info/events/5c8fd864-784b-4d8f-9bb7-bccbca5f1b63
-
#PrivacyWeek affronta il tema delle Smart City: solo sorveglianza.
Savarelli, Mine Crime: in arrivo "Giove", la Polizia Predittiva anche in Italia.
#Socialscoring? In Italia c’è già.
https://www.fronteampio.it/privacy-week-2-il-futuro-della-sorveglianza-di-massa-e-oggi/
E’ tardi per fermare una giustizia distopica? -
#PrivacyWeek affronta il tema delle Smart City: solo sorveglianza.
Savarelli, Mine Crime: in arrivo "Giove", la Polizia Predittiva anche in Italia.
#Socialscoring? In Italia c’è già.
https://www.fronteampio.it/privacy-week-2-il-futuro-della-sorveglianza-di-massa-e-oggi/
E’ tardi per fermare una giustizia distopica? -
In a landmark decision, the #EuropeanParliament's #IMCO and #LIBE committees has adopted a ban on #BiometricMassSurveillance and numerous other dangerous #AI practices including #predictivepolicing and #socialscoring
Final vote on Parliament position at the next #plenary
-
#Surveillance cameras with #FacialRecognition come in handy for dictators and others who want to #suppress (part of) their population. #Iran #WomensRights
#SocialScoring
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-installs-cameras-public-places-identify-penalise-unveiled-women-police-2023-04-08/ -
Der Digitalpolitische Wochenrückblick.
Mehr Infos/Quellen UND weitere Themen: https://piratenpartei.ch/digitalpolitische-Woche/
Beiträge von/mit:
@digiges @markusreuter @edri @echo_pbreyer @marcel
#winterkongress #chatkontrolle #SocialScoring #ChatGPT #Blockchain #Terrorismus #EMBAG -
📬 AI Act: EU-weite biometrische Massenüberwachung kommt wohl
#Datenschutz #ArtifizielleIntelligenz #KünstlicheIntelligenz #PatrickBreyer #SocialScoring #Sozialkreditsystem https://tarnkappe.info/artikel/datenschutz/ai-act-eu-weite-biometrische-massenueberwachung-kommt-wohl-260735.html