#socialcoding — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #socialcoding, aggregated by home.social.
-
Like the previous article on Grassroots fediverse evolution, this is a long blog post, so I provided an article summary to be TL;DR'ed 😊
-
Like the previous article on Grassroots fediverse evolution, this is a long blog post, so I provided an article summary to be TL;DR'ed 😊
-
Like the previous article on Grassroots fediverse evolution, this is a long blog post, so I provided an article summary to be TL;DR'ed 😊
-
Like the previous article on Grassroots fediverse evolution, this is a long blog post, so I provided an article summary to be TL;DR'ed 😊
-
Like the previous article on Grassroots fediverse evolution, this is a long blog post, so I provided an article summary to be TL;DR'ed 😊
-
> So I would say: do not be afraid of standing on the shoulders of giants. [..] So, to answer your question: we have built the foundations. Now it is time to use them more. Continuing to develop everything from scratch may be enjoyable for some people
In my blog post I briefly mention that related to Social experience design, and the mindset / perspective shifts that are involved, there is a different way to perceive our commons, which is less likely to lead to all kinds of expectation mismatches.
I mention the counter-intuitive first rule of Hedonic peer production again, of:
> Do not ask what you can do for the commons, but what the commons can do for you.
This turns things upside down to how we usually view our #commons participation e.g. in an implied "I created this FOSS project already, so now I deserve your contributions". That is a false notion. You should not be expecting that, can't expect that, and have firm drivers and motivators.
-
> So I would say: do not be afraid of standing on the shoulders of giants. [..] So, to answer your question: we have built the foundations. Now it is time to use them more. Continuing to develop everything from scratch may be enjoyable for some people
In my blog post I briefly mention that related to Social experience design, and the mindset / perspective shifts that are involved, there is a different way to perceive our commons, which is less likely to lead to all kinds of expectation mismatches.
I mention the counter-intuitive first rule of Hedonic peer production again, of:
> Do not ask what you can do for the commons, but what the commons can do for you.
This turns things upside down to how we usually view our #commons participation e.g. in an implied "I created this FOSS project already, so now I deserve your contributions". That is a false notion. You should not be expecting that, can't expect that, and have firm drivers and motivators.
-
> So I would say: do not be afraid of standing on the shoulders of giants. [..] So, to answer your question: we have built the foundations. Now it is time to use them more. Continuing to develop everything from scratch may be enjoyable for some people
In my blog post I briefly mention that related to Social experience design, and the mindset / perspective shifts that are involved, there is a different way to perceive our commons, which is less likely to lead to all kinds of expectation mismatches.
I mention the counter-intuitive first rule of Hedonic peer production again, of:
> Do not ask what you can do for the commons, but what the commons can do for you.
This turns things upside down to how we usually view our #commons participation e.g. in an implied "I created this FOSS project already, so now I deserve your contributions". That is a false notion. You should not be expecting that, can't expect that, and have firm drivers and motivators.
-
> So I would say: do not be afraid of standing on the shoulders of giants. [..] So, to answer your question: we have built the foundations. Now it is time to use them more. Continuing to develop everything from scratch may be enjoyable for some people
In my blog post I briefly mention that related to Social experience design, and the mindset / perspective shifts that are involved, there is a different way to perceive our commons, which is less likely to lead to all kinds of expectation mismatches.
I mention the counter-intuitive first rule of Hedonic peer production again, of:
> Do not ask what you can do for the commons, but what the commons can do for you.
This turns things upside down to how we usually view our #commons participation e.g. in an implied "I created this FOSS project already, so now I deserve your contributions". That is a false notion. You should not be expecting that, can't expect that, and have firm drivers and motivators.
-
> So I would say: do not be afraid of standing on the shoulders of giants. [..] So, to answer your question: we have built the foundations. Now it is time to use them more. Continuing to develop everything from scratch may be enjoyable for some people
In my blog post I briefly mention that related to Social experience design, and the mindset / perspective shifts that are involved, there is a different way to perceive our commons, which is less likely to lead to all kinds of expectation mismatches.
I mention the counter-intuitive first rule of Hedonic peer production again, of:
> Do not ask what you can do for the commons, but what the commons can do for you.
This turns things upside down to how we usually view our #commons participation e.g. in an implied "I created this FOSS project already, so now I deserve your contributions". That is a false notion. You should not be expecting that, can't expect that, and have firm drivers and motivators.
-
Great that you found the lists useful. There are 2 other fediverse-related list in the delightful commons initiative.
-
Great that you found the lists useful. There are 2 other fediverse-related list in the delightful commons initiative.
-
Great that you found the lists useful. There are 2 other fediverse-related list in the delightful commons initiative.
-
Great that you found the lists useful. There are 2 other fediverse-related list in the delightful commons initiative.
-
Great that you found the lists useful. There are 2 other fediverse-related list in the delightful commons initiative.
-
In daily life, if you talk to someone, you have the right to remember what was said, right?
And if you don't possess photographic memory, you have the right to take notes, keep record, maintain a diary, yes?
And no one has the right to order you to forget your memories, or under normal circumstances to destroy your notes?
So if you have a single-person #fediverse instance, it is okay then to ignore #ActivityPub Delete requests to erase your memory of online public conversations you had with others?
-
In daily life, if you talk to someone, you have the right to remember what was said, right?
And if you don't possess photographic memory, you have the right to take notes, keep record, maintain a diary, yes?
And no one has the right to order you to forget your memories, or under normal circumstances to destroy your notes?
So if you have a single-person #fediverse instance, it is okay then to ignore #ActivityPub Delete requests to erase your memory of online public conversations you had with others?
-
In daily life, if you talk to someone, you have the right to remember what was said, right?
And if you don't possess photographic memory, you have the right to take notes, keep record, maintain a diary, yes?
And no one has the right to order you to forget your memories, or under normal circumstances to destroy your notes?
So if you have a single-person #fediverse instance, it is okay then to ignore #ActivityPub Delete requests to erase your memory of online public conversations you had with others?
-
In daily life, if you talk to someone, you have the right to remember what was said, right?
And if you don't possess photographic memory, you have the right to take notes, keep record, maintain a diary, yes?
And no one has the right to order you to forget your memories, or under normal circumstances to destroy your notes?
So if you have a single-person #fediverse instance, it is okay then to ignore #ActivityPub Delete requests to erase your memory of online public conversations you had with others?
-
In daily life, if you talk to someone, you have the right to remember what was said, right?
And if you don't possess photographic memory, you have the right to take notes, keep record, maintain a diary, yes?
And no one has the right to order you to forget your memories, or under normal circumstances to destroy your notes?
So if you have a single-person #fediverse instance, it is okay then to ignore #ActivityPub Delete requests to erase your memory of online public conversations you had with others?
-
Yet more overstimulation of this #fediverse cauldron of #Humankind and #HumanCreation where new society blossoms in all its brilliant colors. 🌈
#SocialInnovationSpaces also.
Where people give a 🪙 and add their 🪙🪙https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116454115562895220
Ping 🔔 #UrgentPlatitude delivery..
A wisdom tile has arrived, @EUCommission
-
Yet more overstimulation of this #fediverse cauldron of #Humankind and #HumanCreation where new society blossoms in all its brilliant colors. 🌈
#SocialInnovationSpaces also.
Where people give a 🪙 and add their 🪙🪙https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116454115562895220
Ping 🔔 #UrgentPlatitude delivery..
A wisdom tile has arrived, @EUCommission
-
Yet more overstimulation of this #fediverse cauldron of #Humankind and #HumanCreation where new society blossoms in all its brilliant colors. 🌈
#SocialInnovationSpaces also.
Where people give a 🪙 and add their 🪙🪙https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116454115562895220
Ping 🔔 #UrgentPlatitude delivery..
A wisdom tile has arrived, @EUCommission
-
Yet more overstimulation of this #fediverse cauldron of #Humankind and #HumanCreation where new society blossoms in all its brilliant colors. 🌈
#SocialInnovationSpaces also.
Where people give a 🪙 and add their 🪙🪙https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116454115562895220
Ping 🔔 #UrgentPlatitude delivery..
A wisdom tile has arrived, @EUCommission
-
Yet more overstimulation of this #fediverse cauldron of #Humankind and #HumanCreation where new society blossoms in all its brilliant colors. 🌈
#SocialInnovationSpaces also.
Where people give a 🪙 and add their 🪙🪙https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116454115562895220
Ping 🔔 #UrgentPlatitude delivery..
A wisdom tile has arrived, @EUCommission
-
#ThoughtProvoker :blobhyperthink:
Hypercapitalism is NOT root cause of #Humankind's wicked problems, like #ClimateChange. Or is it?
It is all a matter of perspective.. And making perspective shifts.
-
#ThoughtProvoker :blobhyperthink:
Hypercapitalism is NOT root cause of #Humankind's wicked problems, like #ClimateChange. Or is it?
It is all a matter of perspective.. And making perspective shifts.
-
#ThoughtProvoker :blobhyperthink:
Hypercapitalism is NOT root cause of #Humankind's wicked problems, like #ClimateChange. Or is it?
It is all a matter of perspective.. And making perspective shifts.
-
#ThoughtProvoker :blobhyperthink:
Hypercapitalism is NOT root cause of #Humankind's wicked problems, like #ClimateChange. Or is it?
It is all a matter of perspective.. And making perspective shifts.
-
#ThoughtProvoker :blobhyperthink:
Hypercapitalism is NOT root cause of #Humankind's wicked problems, like #ClimateChange. Or is it?
It is all a matter of perspective.. And making perspective shifts.
-
Yes, I know. And endless strife.
SX separates #FOSS from the movement of people that creates it. FOSS is code/software + an open license. Period.
Under SX, where solution development involves software creation, FOSS is the end of the supply line. FOSS software is a SX artifact. Its only purpose is to serve the formulated solution that was the reason to start programming. And that solution in turn is only meaningful to the extent it fulfills people's needs.
Including the creator, if they need sustenance to continue their good work. This is the crux. It isn't there for FOSS creators, its an inherently unsustainable field.
Separating FOSS software from those creating it allows focus on healthy processes, that do not burnout their participants and they leave.
Here SX defines #SOSS, Sustainable open social systems..
https://coding.social/blog/reimagine-social/#sustainable-open-social-systems
-
Yes, I know. And endless strife.
SX separates #FOSS from the movement of people that creates it. FOSS is code/software + an open license. Period.
Under SX, where solution development involves software creation, FOSS is the end of the supply line. FOSS software is a SX artifact. Its only purpose is to serve the formulated solution that was the reason to start programming. And that solution in turn is only meaningful to the extent it fulfills people's needs.
Including the creator, if they need sustenance to continue their good work. This is the crux. It isn't there for FOSS creators, its an inherently unsustainable field.
Separating FOSS software from those creating it allows focus on healthy processes, that do not burnout their participants and they leave.
Here SX defines #SOSS, Sustainable open social systems..
https://coding.social/blog/reimagine-social/#sustainable-open-social-systems
-
Yes, I know. And endless strife.
SX separates #FOSS from the movement of people that creates it. FOSS is code/software + an open license. Period.
Under SX, where solution development involves software creation, FOSS is the end of the supply line. FOSS software is a SX artifact. Its only purpose is to serve the formulated solution that was the reason to start programming. And that solution in turn is only meaningful to the extent it fulfills people's needs.
Including the creator, if they need sustenance to continue their good work. This is the crux. It isn't there for FOSS creators, its an inherently unsustainable field.
Separating FOSS software from those creating it allows focus on healthy processes, that do not burnout their participants and they leave.
Here SX defines #SOSS, Sustainable open social systems..
https://coding.social/blog/reimagine-social/#sustainable-open-social-systems
-
Yes, I know. And endless strife.
SX separates #FOSS from the movement of people that creates it. FOSS is code/software + an open license. Period.
Under SX, where solution development involves software creation, FOSS is the end of the supply line. FOSS software is a SX artifact. Its only purpose is to serve the formulated solution that was the reason to start programming. And that solution in turn is only meaningful to the extent it fulfills people's needs.
Including the creator, if they need sustenance to continue their good work. This is the crux. It isn't there for FOSS creators, its an inherently unsustainable field.
Separating FOSS software from those creating it allows focus on healthy processes, that do not burnout their participants and they leave.
Here SX defines #SOSS, Sustainable open social systems..
https://coding.social/blog/reimagine-social/#sustainable-open-social-systems
-
Yes, I know. And endless strife.
SX separates #FOSS from the movement of people that creates it. FOSS is code/software + an open license. Period.
Under SX, where solution development involves software creation, FOSS is the end of the supply line. FOSS software is a SX artifact. Its only purpose is to serve the formulated solution that was the reason to start programming. And that solution in turn is only meaningful to the extent it fulfills people's needs.
Including the creator, if they need sustenance to continue their good work. This is the crux. It isn't there for FOSS creators, its an inherently unsustainable field.
Separating FOSS software from those creating it allows focus on healthy processes, that do not burnout their participants and they leave.
Here SX defines #SOSS, Sustainable open social systems..
https://coding.social/blog/reimagine-social/#sustainable-open-social-systems
-
The only thing that I would bring in regarding emoji use in display names is #a11y issues if there are a lot of them. I'd say recommended practice should be to have 1 and max. 2 emoji in the name, so #screenreaders don't have read a long shebang you sometimes see on 'funny' display names.
But perhaps someone better versed in #accessibility issues for the visually impaired can chime in on this #ActivityPub #FEP (and perhaps other FEP's too), if this is a real issue. A "fediverse accessibility best-practices" may exist as well (somewhere).
-
The only thing that I would bring in regarding emoji use in display names is #a11y issues if there are a lot of them. I'd say recommended practice should be to have 1 and max. 2 emoji in the name, so #screenreaders don't have read a long shebang you sometimes see on 'funny' display names.
But perhaps someone better versed in #accessibility issues for the visually impaired can chime in on this #ActivityPub #FEP (and perhaps other FEP's too), if this is a real issue. A "fediverse accessibility best-practices" may exist as well (somewhere).
-
The only thing that I would bring in regarding emoji use in display names is #a11y issues if there are a lot of them. I'd say recommended practice should be to have 1 and max. 2 emoji in the name, so #screenreaders don't have read a long shebang you sometimes see on 'funny' display names.
But perhaps someone better versed in #accessibility issues for the visually impaired can chime in on this #ActivityPub #FEP (and perhaps other FEP's too), if this is a real issue. A "fediverse accessibility best-practices" may exist as well (somewhere).
-
The only thing that I would bring in regarding emoji use in display names is #a11y issues if there are a lot of them. I'd say recommended practice should be to have 1 and max. 2 emoji in the name, so #screenreaders don't have read a long shebang you sometimes see on 'funny' display names.
But perhaps someone better versed in #accessibility issues for the visually impaired can chime in on this #ActivityPub #FEP (and perhaps other FEP's too), if this is a real issue. A "fediverse accessibility best-practices" may exist as well (somewhere).
-
The only thing that I would bring in regarding emoji use in display names is #a11y issues if there are a lot of them. I'd say recommended practice should be to have 1 and max. 2 emoji in the name, so #screenreaders don't have read a long shebang you sometimes see on 'funny' display names.
But perhaps someone better versed in #accessibility issues for the visually impaired can chime in on this #ActivityPub #FEP (and perhaps other FEP's too), if this is a real issue. A "fediverse accessibility best-practices" may exist as well (somewhere).
-
PS. I outline a lot of these thoughts in my recent blog post on Grassroots fediverse #evolution, see:
-
PS. I outline a lot of these thoughts in my recent blog post on Grassroots fediverse #evolution, see:
-
PS. I outline a lot of these thoughts in my recent blog post on Grassroots fediverse #evolution, see:
-
PS. I outline a lot of these thoughts in my recent blog post on Grassroots fediverse #evolution, see:
-
PS. I outline a lot of these thoughts in my recent blog post on Grassroots fediverse #evolution, see: