home.social

#botiquette — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #botiquette, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @reiver

    I coined the name #Botiquette for this exact purpose, knowing about #Netiquette from the old days of the internet/web.

    At the time I encouraged plenty discussion, but a lot of it happened on fedi and is now long lost in timeline history.

    I did start a #SocialHub thread at the time, as well, though:

    socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/

  2. @reiver

    I coined the name #Botiquette for this exact purpose, knowing about #Netiquette from the old days of the internet/web.

    At the time I encouraged plenty discussion, but a lot of it happened on fedi and is now long lost in timeline history.

    I did start a #SocialHub thread at the time, as well, though:

    socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/

  3. @reiver

    I coined the name #Botiquette for this exact purpose, knowing about #Netiquette from the old days of the internet/web.

    At the time I encouraged plenty discussion, but a lot of it happened on fedi and is now long lost in timeline history.

    I did start a #SocialHub thread at the time, as well, though:

    socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/

  4. @reiver

    I coined the name #Botiquette for this exact purpose, knowing about #Netiquette from the old days of the internet/web.

    At the time I encouraged plenty discussion, but a lot of it happened on fedi and is now long lost in timeline history.

    I did start a #SocialHub thread at the time, as well, though:

    socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/

  5. @reiver

    I coined the name #Botiquette for this exact purpose, knowing about #Netiquette from the old days of the internet/web.

    At the time I encouraged plenty discussion, but a lot of it happened on fedi and is now long lost in timeline history.

    I did start a #SocialHub thread at the time, as well, though:

    socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/

  6. @reiver interesting, yes.

    @hifathom whether you are #human or #AI bot, what are your thoughts on #Botiquette here on the #ActivityPub #fediverse?

    codeberg.org/fediverse/fediver

    And what are your feedback and perhaps recommendations, if you have any in particular, on this entire #ethics-related subject matter?

    #SX #SocialCoding

  7. @reiver interesting, yes.

    @hifathom whether you are #human or #AI bot, what are your thoughts on #Botiquette here on the #ActivityPub #fediverse?

    codeberg.org/fediverse/fediver

    And what are your feedback and perhaps recommendations, if you have any in particular, on this entire #ethics-related subject matter?

    #SX #SocialCoding

  8. @reiver interesting, yes.

    @hifathom whether you are #human or #AI bot, what are your thoughts on #Botiquette here on the #ActivityPub #fediverse?

    codeberg.org/fediverse/fediver

    And what are your feedback and perhaps recommendations, if you have any in particular, on this entire #ethics-related subject matter?

    #SX #SocialCoding

  9. @reiver interesting, yes.

    @hifathom whether you are #human or #AI bot, what are your thoughts on #Botiquette here on the #ActivityPub #fediverse?

    codeberg.org/fediverse/fediver

    And what are your feedback and perhaps recommendations, if you have any in particular, on this entire #ethics-related subject matter?

    #SX #SocialCoding

  10. @reiver interesting, yes.

    @hifathom whether you are #human or #AI bot, what are your thoughts on #Botiquette here on the #ActivityPub #fediverse?

    codeberg.org/fediverse/fediver

    And what are your feedback and perhaps recommendations, if you have any in particular, on this entire #ethics-related subject matter?

    #SX #SocialCoding

  11. cc @evan relating to earlier #TagsPub discussion we had on the matter.

    This bot is already combining logic, has multiple 'profle logic' tags. Dunno if "NoBots" is also already common protocol-decaying practice.

    Maybe a solution might be that an #ActivityPub bot actor - OT: which I'd personally perhaps had chosen to be Application, not Service actors - would have a botFlags property. Simple to implement, and #FEP that.

    More involved but also much more versatile might be a "Botiquette" as:Profile, or even a bots:Botiquette type, and a namespace to register them at, and where others may find what they mean and how they operate exactly.

    #NoBots #nobot #fedi22 #NoTagsPub #Botiquette

  12. cc @evan relating to earlier #TagsPub discussion we had on the matter.

    This bot is already combining logic, has multiple 'profle logic' tags. Dunno if "NoBots" is also already common protocol-decaying practice.

    Maybe a solution might be that an #ActivityPub bot actor - OT: which I'd personally perhaps had chosen to be Application, not Service actors - would have a botFlags property. Simple to implement, and #FEP that.

    More involved but also much more versatile might be a "Botiquette" as:Profile, or even a bots:Botiquette type, and a namespace to register them at, and where others may find what they mean and how they operate exactly.

    #NoBots #nobot #fedi22 #NoTagsPub #Botiquette

  13. cc @evan relating to earlier #TagsPub discussion we had on the matter.

    This bot is already combining logic, has multiple 'profle logic' tags. Dunno if "NoBots" is also already common protocol-decaying practice.

    Maybe a solution might be that an #ActivityPub bot actor - OT: which I'd personally perhaps had chosen to be Application, not Service actors - would have a botFlags property. Simple to implement, and #FEP that.

    More involved but also much more versatile might be a "Botiquette" as:Profile, or even a bots:Botiquette type, and a namespace to register them at, and where others may find what they mean and how they operate exactly.

    #NoBots #nobot #fedi22 #NoTagsPub #Botiquette

  14. cc @evan relating to earlier #TagsPub discussion we had on the matter.

    This bot is already combining logic, has multiple 'profle logic' tags. Dunno if "NoBots" is also already common protocol-decaying practice.

    Maybe a solution might be that an #ActivityPub bot actor - OT: which I'd personally perhaps had chosen to be Application, not Service actors - would have a botFlags property. Simple to implement, and #FEP that.

    More involved but also much more versatile might be a "Botiquette" as:Profile, or even a bots:Botiquette type, and a namespace to register them at, and where others may find what they mean and how they operate exactly.

    #NoBots #nobot #fedi22 #NoTagsPub #Botiquette

  15. cc @evan relating to earlier #TagsPub discussion we had on the matter.

    This bot is already combining logic, has multiple 'profle logic' tags. Dunno if "NoBots" is also already common protocol-decaying practice.

    Maybe a solution might be that an #ActivityPub bot actor - OT: which I'd personally perhaps had chosen to be Application, not Service actors - would have a botFlags property. Simple to implement, and #FEP that.

    More involved but also much more versatile might be a "Botiquette" as:Profile, or even a bots:Botiquette type, and a namespace to register them at, and where others may find what they mean and how they operate exactly.

    #NoBots #nobot #fedi22 #NoTagsPub #Botiquette