#legalprecedent — Public Fediverse posts on home.social

Ramin Honary @[email protected] · 2026-03-13 · 13:38 UTC

Yet again, US courts side with AI, let big tech get away with stealing.

(Quoting the article, some editing for brevity.)

Carter spent years building up Diversity Photos, which he founded because minority communities have been historically overlooked in stock photography. Carter says the company invested heavily in recruiting real, everyday people and obtained proper consent for the photos.
After launching in 2016, Diversity Photos made strong growth and partnered with Adobe in 2018 via a Stock Contributor Agreement. “The deal was a revenue-share arrangement,” Carter explains. “We’d supply the content, Adobe would distribute it through Adobe Stock, and we’d both benefit. We granted Adobe a license to distribute and promote our work to their end customers for mutual benefit — it literally says this in the contract.”
“So when I found out that Adobe had fed our entire library into their AI training pipeline without asking, without a separate license, without any compensation — it was devastating,” Carter says. “They didn’t just use a few images. They ingested our content and used it to build products that now directly compete with us. Adobe’s AI can now generate the same kind of diverse imagery that we spent years and significant resources creating. They took our competitive advantage and turned it into their feature.”
Carter points out that the entire value proposition of Diversity Photos is its scarcity, along with the quality of the content. If a tech company wants to use the archive to train an AI model, Carter will charge a perpetual license premium.
After Adobe informed Carter that it had a right to train its AI with Diversity Photos, the company offered $1,173.93 as a bonus fee. “Not compensation, not a licensing fee — a bonus,” says Carter. “As if they were doing me a favor. And they made it clear they didn’t even believe they were required to pay that under the agreement. … It showed a fundamental disrespect for the value of what we’d created and the communities we represent,” he says.
Carter and his attorney filed for arbitration in June 2024. Adobe then moved for a summary judgment on the case, which was fully granted except for one of Diversity Photos’ claims: negligence. The negligence claim stated that Adobe put Diversity Photos’ archive online without any watermarks or copyright management information. In doing so, other AI companies such as Midjourney, Stability AI, and Google were also able to train on the photo library without compensation. But even on that claim, Carter still didn’t win.
“We believe the arbitration process was fundamentally flawed,” Carter says. “The arbitrator refused to address the cost issue that was contractually required before ruling on Adobe’s motion to dismiss everything.”
Adobe has since moved to have the arbitration award confirmed in court as precedent for future cases. “This has nothing to do with any of our claims so he ruled on something that doesn’t pertain to our case but will be used and referenced against creators for decades,” Carter adds. “We’re asking the court to vacate the award on multiple grounds under California’s arbitration statute.”
Back when Carter signed his agreement with Adobe in 2018, generative AI products didn’t exist. “The contract I signed gave Adobe a license to use my images for ‘developing new features and services [to promote my work],’” Carter says. But while he assumed that wording was there for Adobe to improve its platform, the company assumed otherwise.
“Adobe’s argument? The word ‘new’ means they can do anything new. Anything. Including something that didn’t exist when I signed the contract. Including AI training. Including building a tool that directly competes with the very content I licensed to them… That’s why we’re fighting to have this ruling vacated. Not just for Diversity Photos, but because if this interpretation stands, it sets a precedent that guts creator rights across the board. No contract from the pre-AI era should be interpreted as a blank check for AI training. The creators who signed those agreements never could have imagined this use, and the platforms know it.”
“The irony is that our content is valuable precisely because it’s hard to create — real people, real diversity, real consent… Generative AI threatens to commoditize all of that. And the companies building these AI models are profiting from our work without compensating us.”

Please do read the whole article from PetaPixel.

#tech #ai #Photography #StockPhotos #Diversity #LLMs #GenerativeAI #Adobe #Copyright #Law #Exploitation #LegalPrecedent #BigTech #SmallBusiness

RE: https://mastodon.social/@mattotcha/116222000676732277

#adobe #bigtech #copyright #diversity #exploitation #generativeai

Ramin Honary @[email protected] · 2026-03-13 · 13:38 UTC

Yet again, US courts side with AI, let big tech get away with stealing.

(Quoting the article, some editing for brevity.)

Carter spent years building up Diversity Photos, which he founded because minority communities have been historically overlooked in stock photography. Carter says the company invested heavily in recruiting real, everyday people and obtained proper consent for the photos.
After launching in 2016, Diversity Photos made strong growth and partnered with Adobe in 2018 via a Stock Contributor Agreement. “The deal was a revenue-share arrangement,” Carter explains. “We’d supply the content, Adobe would distribute it through Adobe Stock, and we’d both benefit. We granted Adobe a license to distribute and promote our work to their end customers for mutual benefit — it literally says this in the contract.”
“So when I found out that Adobe had fed our entire library into their AI training pipeline without asking, without a separate license, without any compensation — it was devastating,” Carter says. “They didn’t just use a few images. They ingested our content and used it to build products that now directly compete with us. Adobe’s AI can now generate the same kind of diverse imagery that we spent years and significant resources creating. They took our competitive advantage and turned it into their feature.”
Carter points out that the entire value proposition of Diversity Photos is its scarcity, along with the quality of the content. If a tech company wants to use the archive to train an AI model, Carter will charge a perpetual license premium.
After Adobe informed Carter that it had a right to train its AI with Diversity Photos, the company offered $1,173.93 as a bonus fee. “Not compensation, not a licensing fee — a bonus,” says Carter. “As if they were doing me a favor. And they made it clear they didn’t even believe they were required to pay that under the agreement. … It showed a fundamental disrespect for the value of what we’d created and the communities we represent,” he says.
Carter and his attorney filed for arbitration in June 2024. Adobe then moved for a summary judgment on the case, which was fully granted except for one of Diversity Photos’ claims: negligence. The negligence claim stated that Adobe put Diversity Photos’ archive online without any watermarks or copyright management information. In doing so, other AI companies such as Midjourney, Stability AI, and Google were also able to train on the photo library without compensation. But even on that claim, Carter still didn’t win.
“We believe the arbitration process was fundamentally flawed,” Carter says. “The arbitrator refused to address the cost issue that was contractually required before ruling on Adobe’s motion to dismiss everything.”
Adobe has since moved to have the arbitration award confirmed in court as precedent for future cases. “This has nothing to do with any of our claims so he ruled on something that doesn’t pertain to our case but will be used and referenced against creators for decades,” Carter adds. “We’re asking the court to vacate the award on multiple grounds under California’s arbitration statute.”
Back when Carter signed his agreement with Adobe in 2018, generative AI products didn’t exist. “The contract I signed gave Adobe a license to use my images for ‘developing new features and services [to promote my work],’” Carter says. But while he assumed that wording was there for Adobe to improve its platform, the company assumed otherwise.
“Adobe’s argument? The word ‘new’ means they can do anything new. Anything. Including something that didn’t exist when I signed the contract. Including AI training. Including building a tool that directly competes with the very content I licensed to them… That’s why we’re fighting to have this ruling vacated. Not just for Diversity Photos, but because if this interpretation stands, it sets a precedent that guts creator rights across the board. No contract from the pre-AI era should be interpreted as a blank check for AI training. The creators who signed those agreements never could have imagined this use, and the platforms know it.”
“The irony is that our content is valuable precisely because it’s hard to create — real people, real diversity, real consent… Generative AI threatens to commoditize all of that. And the companies building these AI models are profiting from our work without compensating us.”

Please do read the whole article from PetaPixel.

#tech #ai #Photography #StockPhotos #Diversity #LLMs #GenerativeAI #Adobe #Copyright #Law #Exploitation #LegalPrecedent #BigTech #SmallBusiness

RE: https://mastodon.social/@mattotcha/116222000676732277

#adobe #bigtech #copyright #diversity #exploitation #generativeai

Ramin Honary @[email protected] · 2026-03-13 · 13:38 UTC

Yet again, US courts side with AI, let big tech get away with stealing.

(Quoting the article, some editing for brevity.)

Carter spent years building up Diversity Photos, which he founded because minority communities have been historically overlooked in stock photography. Carter says the company invested heavily in recruiting real, everyday people and obtained proper consent for the photos.
After launching in 2016, Diversity Photos made strong growth and partnered with Adobe in 2018 via a Stock Contributor Agreement. “The deal was a revenue-share arrangement,” Carter explains. “We’d supply the content, Adobe would distribute it through Adobe Stock, and we’d both benefit. We granted Adobe a license to distribute and promote our work to their end customers for mutual benefit — it literally says this in the contract.”
“So when I found out that Adobe had fed our entire library into their AI training pipeline without asking, without a separate license, without any compensation — it was devastating,” Carter says. “They didn’t just use a few images. They ingested our content and used it to build products that now directly compete with us. Adobe’s AI can now generate the same kind of diverse imagery that we spent years and significant resources creating. They took our competitive advantage and turned it into their feature.”
Carter points out that the entire value proposition of Diversity Photos is its scarcity, along with the quality of the content. If a tech company wants to use the archive to train an AI model, Carter will charge a perpetual license premium.
After Adobe informed Carter that it had a right to train its AI with Diversity Photos, the company offered $1,173.93 as a bonus fee. “Not compensation, not a licensing fee — a bonus,” says Carter. “As if they were doing me a favor. And they made it clear they didn’t even believe they were required to pay that under the agreement. … It showed a fundamental disrespect for the value of what we’d created and the communities we represent,” he says.
Carter and his attorney filed for arbitration in June 2024. Adobe then moved for a summary judgment on the case, which was fully granted except for one of Diversity Photos’ claims: negligence. The negligence claim stated that Adobe put Diversity Photos’ archive online without any watermarks or copyright management information. In doing so, other AI companies such as Midjourney, Stability AI, and Google were also able to train on the photo library without compensation. But even on that claim, Carter still didn’t win.
“We believe the arbitration process was fundamentally flawed,” Carter says. “The arbitrator refused to address the cost issue that was contractually required before ruling on Adobe’s motion to dismiss everything.”
Adobe has since moved to have the arbitration award confirmed in court as precedent for future cases. “This has nothing to do with any of our claims so he ruled on something that doesn’t pertain to our case but will be used and referenced against creators for decades,” Carter adds. “We’re asking the court to vacate the award on multiple grounds under California’s arbitration statute.”
Back when Carter signed his agreement with Adobe in 2018, generative AI products didn’t exist. “The contract I signed gave Adobe a license to use my images for ‘developing new features and services [to promote my work],’” Carter says. But while he assumed that wording was there for Adobe to improve its platform, the company assumed otherwise.
“Adobe’s argument? The word ‘new’ means they can do anything new. Anything. Including something that didn’t exist when I signed the contract. Including AI training. Including building a tool that directly competes with the very content I licensed to them… That’s why we’re fighting to have this ruling vacated. Not just for Diversity Photos, but because if this interpretation stands, it sets a precedent that guts creator rights across the board. No contract from the pre-AI era should be interpreted as a blank check for AI training. The creators who signed those agreements never could have imagined this use, and the platforms know it.”
“The irony is that our content is valuable precisely because it’s hard to create — real people, real diversity, real consent… Generative AI threatens to commoditize all of that. And the companies building these AI models are profiting from our work without compensating us.”

Please do read the whole article from PetaPixel.

#tech #ai #Photography #StockPhotos #Diversity #LLMs #GenerativeAI #Adobe #Copyright #Law #Exploitation #LegalPrecedent #BigTech #SmallBusiness

RE: https://mastodon.social/@mattotcha/116222000676732277

#tech #ai #stockphotos #smallbusiness #photography #legalprecedent

Ramin Honary @[email protected] · 2026-03-13 · 13:38 UTC

Yet again, US courts side with AI, let big tech get away with stealing.

(Quoting the article, some editing for brevity.)

Carter spent years building up Diversity Photos, which he founded because minority communities have been historically overlooked in stock photography. Carter says the company invested heavily in recruiting real, everyday people and obtained proper consent for the photos.
After launching in 2016, Diversity Photos made strong growth and partnered with Adobe in 2018 via a Stock Contributor Agreement. “The deal was a revenue-share arrangement,” Carter explains. “We’d supply the content, Adobe would distribute it through Adobe Stock, and we’d both benefit. We granted Adobe a license to distribute and promote our work to their end customers for mutual benefit — it literally says this in the contract.”
“So when I found out that Adobe had fed our entire library into their AI training pipeline without asking, without a separate license, without any compensation — it was devastating,” Carter says. “They didn’t just use a few images. They ingested our content and used it to build products that now directly compete with us. Adobe’s AI can now generate the same kind of diverse imagery that we spent years and significant resources creating. They took our competitive advantage and turned it into their feature.”
Carter points out that the entire value proposition of Diversity Photos is its scarcity, along with the quality of the content. If a tech company wants to use the archive to train an AI model, Carter will charge a perpetual license premium.
After Adobe informed Carter that it had a right to train its AI with Diversity Photos, the company offered $1,173.93 as a bonus fee. “Not compensation, not a licensing fee — a bonus,” says Carter. “As if they were doing me a favor. And they made it clear they didn’t even believe they were required to pay that under the agreement. … It showed a fundamental disrespect for the value of what we’d created and the communities we represent,” he says.
Carter and his attorney filed for arbitration in June 2024. Adobe then moved for a summary judgment on the case, which was fully granted except for one of Diversity Photos’ claims: negligence. The negligence claim stated that Adobe put Diversity Photos’ archive online without any watermarks or copyright management information. In doing so, other AI companies such as Midjourney, Stability AI, and Google were also able to train on the photo library without compensation. But even on that claim, Carter still didn’t win.
“We believe the arbitration process was fundamentally flawed,” Carter says. “The arbitrator refused to address the cost issue that was contractually required before ruling on Adobe’s motion to dismiss everything.”
Adobe has since moved to have the arbitration award confirmed in court as precedent for future cases. “This has nothing to do with any of our claims so he ruled on something that doesn’t pertain to our case but will be used and referenced against creators for decades,” Carter adds. “We’re asking the court to vacate the award on multiple grounds under California’s arbitration statute.”
Back when Carter signed his agreement with Adobe in 2018, generative AI products didn’t exist. “The contract I signed gave Adobe a license to use my images for ‘developing new features and services [to promote my work],’” Carter says. But while he assumed that wording was there for Adobe to improve its platform, the company assumed otherwise.
“Adobe’s argument? The word ‘new’ means they can do anything new. Anything. Including something that didn’t exist when I signed the contract. Including AI training. Including building a tool that directly competes with the very content I licensed to them… That’s why we’re fighting to have this ruling vacated. Not just for Diversity Photos, but because if this interpretation stands, it sets a precedent that guts creator rights across the board. No contract from the pre-AI era should be interpreted as a blank check for AI training. The creators who signed those agreements never could have imagined this use, and the platforms know it.”
“The irony is that our content is valuable precisely because it’s hard to create — real people, real diversity, real consent… Generative AI threatens to commoditize all of that. And the companies building these AI models are profiting from our work without compensating us.”

Please do read the whole article from PetaPixel.

#tech #ai #Photography #StockPhotos #Diversity #LLMs #GenerativeAI #Adobe #Copyright #Law #Exploitation #LegalPrecedent #BigTech #SmallBusiness

RE: https://mastodon.social/@mattotcha/116222000676732277

#adobe #bigtech #copyright #diversity #exploitation #generativeai

United States @[email protected] · 2026-02-21 · 10:05 UTC

When the Rule of Law Meets Political Pressure

These voices are not partisan. They are principled. Having served on the bench with fidelity to law over…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #america #equaljustice #geopolitics #legalprecedent #politicalpressure #Politics #RuleofLaw #selectiveenforcement #unitedstatesofamerica #UnitedStatesPolitics #USPolitics #usapolitics
https://www.europesays.com/2794979/

#usapolitics #uspolitics #unitedstatespolitics #unitedstatesofamerica #selectiveenforcement #ruleoflaw

WYM Mod @[email protected] · 2025-09-22 · 20:36 UTC

Can the president now control independent agencies? Abbie VanSickle and Ann E. Marimow reveal the Supreme Court’s groundbreaking move allowing Trump to dismiss an FTC commissioner and reconsider limits on presidential removal power. This could drastically shift federal regulatory dynamics. Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/22/us/politics/supreme-court-ftc-commissioner-firing.html #AbbieVanSickle #AnnEMarimow #SupremeCourt #FTC #PresidentialPower #LegalPrecedent

#abbievansickle #annemarimow #supremecourt #ftc #presidentialpower #legalprecedent

WYM Mod @[email protected] · 2025-09-22 · 20:36 UTC

Can the president now control independent agencies? Abbie VanSickle and Ann E. Marimow reveal the Supreme Court’s groundbreaking move allowing Trump to dismiss an FTC commissioner and reconsider limits on presidential removal power. This could drastically shift federal regulatory dynamics. Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/22/us/politics/supreme-court-ftc-commissioner-firing.html #AbbieVanSickle #AnnEMarimow #SupremeCourt #FTC #PresidentialPower #LegalPrecedent

#legalprecedent #presidentialpower #ftc #supremecourt #annemarimow #abbievansickle

Alpine Law Associates @[email protected] · 2025-09-22 · 05:31 UTC

https://lawalpine.com/blog/stare-decisis-in-nepal

Alpine Law Associates - Stare Decisis in Nepal

The principle of stare decisis, meaning “to stand by what has been decided,” is a cornerstone of Nepal’s legal framework. It ensures that courts follow established precedents in similar cases, fostering consistency, stability, and fairness in judicial decisions.

#StareDecisisNepal #LegalPrecedent #JudiciaryNepal #JusticeNepal #LawAlpine #RuleOfLawNepal #SupremeCourtNepal

#staredecisisnepal #legalprecedent #judiciarynepal #justicenepal #lawalpine #ruleoflawnepal

Yonhap Infomax News @[email protected] · 2025-08-29 · 19:10 UTC

The U.S. District Court in Washington held its first hearing on the dismissal of Fed Governor Lisa Cook, debating presidential authority versus legal ambiguity, as both sides argued over the definition of "cause" for removal—an unprecedented move in the Fed's 112-year history.
#YonhapInfomax #FederalReserve #LisaCook #PresidentialAuthority #DismissalHearing #LegalPrecedent #Economics #FinancialMarkets #Banking #Securities #Bonds #StockMarket
https://en.infomaxai.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=79453

#yonhapinfomax #federalreserve #lisacook #presidentialauthority #dismissalhearing #legalprecedent

Yonhap Infomax News @[email protected] · 2025-08-29 · 19:10 UTC

The U.S. District Court in Washington held its first hearing on the dismissal of Fed Governor Lisa Cook, debating presidential authority versus legal ambiguity, as both sides argued over the definition of "cause" for removal—an unprecedented move in the Fed's 112-year history.
#YonhapInfomax #FederalReserve #LisaCook #PresidentialAuthority #DismissalHearing #LegalPrecedent #Economics #FinancialMarkets #Banking #Securities #Bonds #StockMarket
https://en.infomaxai.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=79453

#yonhapinfomax #federalreserve #lisacook #presidentialauthority #dismissalhearing #legalprecedent

Yonhap Infomax News @[email protected] · 2025-08-29 · 19:10 UTC

The U.S. District Court in Washington held its first hearing on the dismissal of Fed Governor Lisa Cook, debating presidential authority versus legal ambiguity, as both sides argued over the definition of "cause" for removal—an unprecedented move in the Fed's 112-year history.
#YonhapInfomax #FederalReserve #LisaCook #PresidentialAuthority #DismissalHearing #LegalPrecedent #Economics #FinancialMarkets #Banking #Securities #Bonds #StockMarket
https://en.infomaxai.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=79453

#stockmarket #bonds #securities #banking #financialmarkets #economics

Yonhap Infomax News @[email protected] · 2025-08-29 · 19:10 UTC

The U.S. District Court in Washington held its first hearing on the dismissal of Fed Governor Lisa Cook, debating presidential authority versus legal ambiguity, as both sides argued over the definition of "cause" for removal—an unprecedented move in the Fed's 112-year history.
#YonhapInfomax #FederalReserve #LisaCook #PresidentialAuthority #DismissalHearing #LegalPrecedent #Economics #FinancialMarkets #Banking #Securities #Bonds #StockMarket
https://en.infomaxai.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=79453

#yonhapinfomax #federalreserve #lisacook #presidentialauthority #dismissalhearing #legalprecedent

N-gated Hacker News @[email protected] · 2025-07-21 · 18:14 UTC

🎮Ah, the Game Genie: because who wouldn’t want to turn their NES into a buggy mess of cheat codes that doesn't even have Nintendo's blessing? 😂 Now, marvel at how a glorified glitch-maker became a pivotal moment in copyright law—because nothing screams legal precedent like hacking Mario to jump into oblivion.🚀
https://tedium.co/2025/07/21/the-game-genie-generation/ #GameGenie #CopyrightHack #NESCheatCodes #VideoGameHistory #LegalPrecedent #HackerNews #ngated

#gamegenie #copyrighthack #nescheatcodes #videogamehistory #legalprecedent #hackernews

N-gated Hacker News @[email protected] · 2025-07-21 · 18:14 UTC

🎮Ah, the Game Genie: because who wouldn’t want to turn their NES into a buggy mess of cheat codes that doesn't even have Nintendo's blessing? 😂 Now, marvel at how a glorified glitch-maker became a pivotal moment in copyright law—because nothing screams legal precedent like hacking Mario to jump into oblivion.🚀
https://tedium.co/2025/07/21/the-game-genie-generation/ #GameGenie #CopyrightHack #NESCheatCodes #VideoGameHistory #LegalPrecedent #HackerNews #ngated

#gamegenie #copyrighthack #nescheatcodes #videogamehistory #legalprecedent #hackernews

N-gated Hacker News @[email protected] · 2025-07-21 · 18:14 UTC

🎮Ah, the Game Genie: because who wouldn’t want to turn their NES into a buggy mess of cheat codes that doesn't even have Nintendo's blessing? 😂 Now, marvel at how a glorified glitch-maker became a pivotal moment in copyright law—because nothing screams legal precedent like hacking Mario to jump into oblivion.🚀
https://tedium.co/2025/07/21/the-game-genie-generation/ #GameGenie #CopyrightHack #NESCheatCodes #VideoGameHistory #LegalPrecedent #HackerNews #ngated

#ngated #hackernews #legalprecedent #videogamehistory #nescheatcodes #copyrighthack

N-gated Hacker News @[email protected] · 2025-07-21 · 18:14 UTC

🎮Ah, the Game Genie: because who wouldn’t want to turn their NES into a buggy mess of cheat codes that doesn't even have Nintendo's blessing? 😂 Now, marvel at how a glorified glitch-maker became a pivotal moment in copyright law—because nothing screams legal precedent like hacking Mario to jump into oblivion.🚀
https://tedium.co/2025/07/21/the-game-genie-generation/ #GameGenie #CopyrightHack #NESCheatCodes #VideoGameHistory #LegalPrecedent #HackerNews #ngated

#gamegenie #copyrighthack #nescheatcodes #videogamehistory #legalprecedent #hackernews

Crypto News @[email protected] · 2024-10-11 · 05:57 UTC

Crypto staking Jarretts again sue IRS over block reward taxes - A previous case brought by Josh and Jessica Jarrett was dismissed in 202... - https://cointelegraph.com/news/irs-sued-over-crypto-staking-tax-policy-josh-jarrett #cryptocurrency #stakingrewards #cryptotaxation #legalprecedent #propertytax #joshjarrett #taxlawsuit #coincenter #blockchain #incometax. #taxrefund #tezos #irs

#irs #tezos #taxrefund #incometax #blockchain #coincenter

Crypto News @[email protected] · 2024-10-11 · 05:57 UTC

Crypto staking Jarretts again sue IRS over block reward taxes - A previous case brought by Josh and Jessica Jarrett was dismissed in 202... - https://cointelegraph.com/news/irs-sued-over-crypto-staking-tax-policy-josh-jarrett #cryptocurrency #stakingrewards #cryptotaxation #legalprecedent #propertytax #joshjarrett #taxlawsuit #coincenter #blockchain #incometax. #taxrefund #tezos #irs

#irs #tezos #taxrefund #incometax #blockchain #coincenter

Crypto News @[email protected] · 2024-10-11 · 05:57 UTC

Crypto staking Jarretts again sue IRS over block reward taxes - A previous case brought by Josh and Jessica Jarrett was dismissed in 202... - https://cointelegraph.com/news/irs-sued-over-crypto-staking-tax-policy-josh-jarrett #cryptocurrency #stakingrewards #cryptotaxation #legalprecedent #propertytax #joshjarrett #taxlawsuit #coincenter #blockchain #incometax. #taxrefund #tezos #irs

#cryptocurrency #stakingrewards #cryptotaxation #legalprecedent #propertytax #joshjarrett

Crypto News @[email protected] · 2024-10-11 · 05:57 UTC

Crypto staking Jarretts again sue IRS over block reward taxes - A previous case brought by Josh and Jessica Jarrett was dismissed in 202... - https://cointelegraph.com/news/irs-sued-over-crypto-staking-tax-policy-josh-jarrett #cryptocurrency #stakingrewards #cryptotaxation #legalprecedent #propertytax #joshjarrett #taxlawsuit #coincenter #blockchain #incometax. #taxrefund #tezos #irs

#irs #tezos #taxrefund #incometax #blockchain #coincenter

Joseph Lim :mastodon: @[email protected] · 2024-07-08 · 04:55 UTC

#Mexico Scores Major Victory Against Monsanto
"the #legalvictory over #Monsanto highlights Mexico’s commitment to safeguarding #publichealth & #environmental integrity .. to ensure tt #GMcorn & #glyphosate are removed fr Mexican #food supply.. outcome of tis trade dispute cld hv #global ramifications in another way: if e panellists end up ruling in Mexico’s favour, it cld set a #legalprecedent. Tt cld encourage other countries to #ban cultivation or import of #GMO crops"🙏
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07/mexico-scores-major-victory-against-bayer-owned-monsanto-as-corn-war-with-us-reaches-decisive-moment.html

#mexico #legalvictory #monsanto #publichealth #environmental #gmcorn

Joseph Lim :mastodon: @[email protected] · 2024-07-08 · 04:55 UTC

#Mexico Scores Major Victory Against Monsanto
"the #legalvictory over #Monsanto highlights Mexico’s commitment to safeguarding #publichealth & #environmental integrity .. to ensure tt #GMcorn & #glyphosate are removed fr Mexican #food supply.. outcome of tis trade dispute cld hv #global ramifications in another way: if e panellists end up ruling in Mexico’s favour, it cld set a #legalprecedent. Tt cld encourage other countries to #ban cultivation or import of #GMO crops"🙏
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07/mexico-scores-major-victory-against-bayer-owned-monsanto-as-corn-war-with-us-reaches-decisive-moment.html

#mexico #legalvictory #monsanto #publichealth #environmental #gmcorn

Joseph Lim :mastodon: @[email protected] · 2024-07-08 · 04:55 UTC

#Mexico Scores Major Victory Against Monsanto
"the #legalvictory over #Monsanto highlights Mexico’s commitment to safeguarding #publichealth & #environmental integrity .. to ensure tt #GMcorn & #glyphosate are removed fr Mexican #food supply.. outcome of tis trade dispute cld hv #global ramifications in another way: if e panellists end up ruling in Mexico’s favour, it cld set a #legalprecedent. Tt cld encourage other countries to #ban cultivation or import of #GMO crops"🙏
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07/mexico-scores-major-victory-against-bayer-owned-monsanto-as-corn-war-with-us-reaches-decisive-moment.html

#mexico #legalvictory #monsanto #publichealth #environmental #gmcorn

Joseph Lim :mastodon: @[email protected] · 2024-07-08 · 04:55 UTC

#Mexico Scores Major Victory Against Monsanto
"the #legalvictory over #Monsanto highlights Mexico’s commitment to safeguarding #publichealth & #environmental integrity .. to ensure tt #GMcorn & #glyphosate are removed fr Mexican #food supply.. outcome of tis trade dispute cld hv #global ramifications in another way: if e panellists end up ruling in Mexico’s favour, it cld set a #legalprecedent. Tt cld encourage other countries to #ban cultivation or import of #GMO crops"🙏
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07/mexico-scores-major-victory-against-bayer-owned-monsanto-as-corn-war-with-us-reaches-decisive-moment.html

#gmo #ban #legalprecedent #global #food #glyphosate

Joseph Lim :mastodon: @[email protected] · 2024-07-08 · 04:55 UTC

#Mexico Scores Major Victory Against Monsanto
"the #legalvictory over #Monsanto highlights Mexico’s commitment to safeguarding #publichealth & #environmental integrity .. to ensure tt #GMcorn & #glyphosate are removed fr Mexican #food supply.. outcome of tis trade dispute cld hv #global ramifications in another way: if e panellists end up ruling in Mexico’s favour, it cld set a #legalprecedent. Tt cld encourage other countries to #ban cultivation or import of #GMO crops"🙏
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07/mexico-scores-major-victory-against-bayer-owned-monsanto-as-corn-war-with-us-reaches-decisive-moment.html

#mexico #legalvictory #monsanto #publichealth #environmental #gmcorn

EconoPass™ @[email protected] · 2024-07-02 · 03:41 UTC

Supreme Court Ruling is Bad News for America
https://econopass.com/news/world/supreme-court-ruling-is-bad-news-for-america
The Supreme Court has handed down a significant ruling that grants former President Donald Trump partial immunity from criminal prosecution. This decision pertains to actions taken while he was in office, shielding him from certain legal consequences but not offering complete immunity.
#USSupremeCourt #SupremeCourt #TrumpImmunity #LegalPrecedent #AmericanJustice #worldnews #dailynews #newsupdate #newstoday #newsfeed

#ussupremecourt #supremecourt #trumpimmunity #legalprecedent #americanjustice #worldnews

EconoPass™ @[email protected] · 2024-07-02 · 03:41 UTC

Supreme Court Ruling is Bad News for America
https://econopass.com/news/world/supreme-court-ruling-is-bad-news-for-america
The Supreme Court has handed down a significant ruling that grants former President Donald Trump partial immunity from criminal prosecution. This decision pertains to actions taken while he was in office, shielding him from certain legal consequences but not offering complete immunity.
#USSupremeCourt #SupremeCourt #TrumpImmunity #LegalPrecedent #AmericanJustice #worldnews #dailynews #newsupdate #newstoday #newsfeed

#ussupremecourt #supremecourt #trumpimmunity #legalprecedent #americanjustice #worldnews

EconoPass™ @[email protected] · 2024-07-02 · 03:41 UTC

Supreme Court Ruling is Bad News for America
https://econopass.com/news/world/supreme-court-ruling-is-bad-news-for-america
The Supreme Court has handed down a significant ruling that grants former President Donald Trump partial immunity from criminal prosecution. This decision pertains to actions taken while he was in office, shielding him from certain legal consequences but not offering complete immunity.
#USSupremeCourt #SupremeCourt #TrumpImmunity #LegalPrecedent #AmericanJustice #worldnews #dailynews #newsupdate #newstoday #newsfeed

#newsfeed #newstoday #newsupdate #dailynews #worldnews #americanjustice

EconoPass™ @[email protected] · 2024-07-02 · 03:41 UTC

Supreme Court Ruling is Bad News for America
https://econopass.com/news/world/supreme-court-ruling-is-bad-news-for-america
The Supreme Court has handed down a significant ruling that grants former President Donald Trump partial immunity from criminal prosecution. This decision pertains to actions taken while he was in office, shielding him from certain legal consequences but not offering complete immunity.
#USSupremeCourt #SupremeCourt #TrumpImmunity #LegalPrecedent #AmericanJustice #worldnews #dailynews #newsupdate #newstoday #newsfeed

#ussupremecourt #supremecourt #trumpimmunity #legalprecedent #americanjustice #worldnews

⁂Krafty⁂ #NoKings @[email protected] · 2024-06-09 · 18:26 UTC

Hmm. I've been researching the #rights US citizens have when it comes to giving your #phone/PIN to cops and I'm wondering... Do you think that when cops get a warrant for your phone PIN, you could give them the pin to a specific profile on the phone but not the other profiles? (I use @GrapheneOS and I'm not sure if there's #legalprecedent for this concept)

#UnitedStatesLaw #GrapheneOS #digitalRights #privacy

#rights #phone #legalprecedent #unitedstateslaw #grapheneos #digitalrights

⁂Krafty⁂ #NoKings @tkk13909 · 2024-06-09 · 18:26 UTC

Hmm. I've been researching the #rights US citizens have when it comes to giving your #phone/PIN to cops and I'm wondering... Do you think that when cops get a warrant for your phone PIN, you could give them the pin to a specific profile on the phone but not the other profiles? (I use @GrapheneOS and I'm not sure if there's #legalprecedent for this concept)

#UnitedStatesLaw #GrapheneOS #digitalRights #privacy

#rights #phone #legalprecedent #unitedstateslaw #grapheneos #digitalrights

⁂Krafty⁂ #NoKings @[email protected] · 2024-06-09 · 18:26 UTC

Hmm. I've been researching the #rights US citizens have when it comes to giving your #phone/PIN to cops and I'm wondering... Do you think that when cops get a warrant for your phone PIN, you could give them the pin to a specific profile on the phone but not the other profiles? (I use @GrapheneOS and I'm not sure if there's #legalprecedent for this concept)

#UnitedStatesLaw #GrapheneOS #digitalRights #privacy

#rights #phone #legalprecedent #unitedstateslaw #grapheneos #digitalrights

⁂Krafty⁂ #NoKings @[email protected] · 2024-06-09 · 18:26 UTC

Hmm. I've been researching the #rights US citizens have when it comes to giving your #phone/PIN to cops and I'm wondering... Do you think that when cops get a warrant for your phone PIN, you could give them the pin to a specific profile on the phone but not the other profiles? (I use @GrapheneOS and I'm not sure if there's #legalprecedent for this concept)

#UnitedStatesLaw #GrapheneOS #digitalRights #privacy

#privacy #digitalrights #grapheneos #unitedstateslaw #legalprecedent #phone

⁂Krafty⁂ #NoKings @[email protected] · 2024-06-09 · 18:26 UTC

Hmm. I've been researching the #rights US citizens have when it comes to giving your #phone/PIN to cops and I'm wondering... Do you think that when cops get a warrant for your phone PIN, you could give them the pin to a specific profile on the phone but not the other profiles? (I use @GrapheneOS and I'm not sure if there's #legalprecedent for this concept)

#UnitedStatesLaw #GrapheneOS #digitalRights #privacy

#rights #phone #legalprecedent #unitedstateslaw #grapheneos #digitalrights

Fred Edwards 🔻 @[email protected] · 2024-01-26 · 17:16 UTC

Personally, I believe every single nation on the planet that has #US debt should permanently default on the loans because of war criminals in the US government... you know, cause paying implies tacit approval of said war criminals.

I mean, fair's fair, right?

#precedent #legalPrecedent

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68104203

#us #precedent #legalprecedent