#gnumake — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #gnumake, aggregated by home.social.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@minotaurs_at_work/116566330254691320
GUYS I DID IT HERE'S HOW:
> Download the #raylib source code.
> Put a terminal in the `src` folder.
> Use #GnuMake with the command `make PLATFORM=PLATFORM_DESKTOP` because we're making a desktop GNU/Linux game.
> This will create an .a file and a series of .o files in the `src` folder.
> Include the .a file in your #GnuGcc linking command with `-L[directory where the file is] -lraylib` and the .o files.
> Remember to include <math.h> with `-lm`and X11 with `-lX11` in your linking command.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@minotaurs_at_work/116566330254691320
GUYS I DID IT HERE'S HOW:
> Download the #raylib source code.
> Put a terminal in the `src` folder.
> Use #GnuMake with the command `make PLATFORM=PLATFORM_DESKTOP` because we're making a desktop GNU/Linux game.
> This will create an .a file and a series of .o files in the `src` folder.
> Include the .a file in your #GnuGcc linking command with `-L[directory where the file is] -lraylib` and the .o files.
> Remember to include <math.h> with `-lm`and X11 with `-lX11` in your linking command.
-
What do you mean the linker that linked and packaged the program did not include the library in the package into which it packaged the library? I'm going insane. Please include the library into the package while packaging the library.
-
What do you mean the linker that linked and packaged the program did not include the library in the package into which it packaged the library? I'm going insane. Please include the library into the package while packaging the library.
-
"What a difference a '-j' makes" is the song I am singing this morning
Just remembered my laptop has lots of cores and if I pass `-j` to `make` then everything runs faster :-).
-
"What a difference a '-j' makes" is the song I am singing this morning
Just remembered my laptop has lots of cores and if I pass `-j` to `make` then everything runs faster :-).
-
"What a difference a '-j' makes" is the song I am singing this morning
Just remembered my laptop has lots of cores and if I pass `-j` to `make` then everything runs faster :-).
-
"What a difference a '-j' makes" is the song I am singing this morning
Just remembered my laptop has lots of cores and if I pass `-j` to `make` then everything runs faster :-).
-
"What a difference a '-j' makes" is the song I am singing this morning
Just remembered my laptop has lots of cores and if I pass `-j` to `make` then everything runs faster :-).
-
Hi folks! ✌️ I have a couple of news about the game about the bird Birdy 🐦📰
I've add Jorik 🐧 to "Walking through street" mini-game, and changed the Birdy's hair color.
The new version you can already download from the Birdy's Codeberg page 🏔️👉 https://codeberg.org/xolatgames/Birdy-wants-crisps/releases/tag/v1.4.2
And also, I upload it to my website soon.
See you soon! 😉👋
#cpp #cpluplus #box2d #sdl #sdl2 #codelite #cmake #cmake3 #codeberg #opensource #game #games #2d #inkscape #tiled #TiledMapEditor #appimage #gamedev #adventure #gnumake
-
Hi folks! ✌️ I have a couple of news about the game about the bird Birdy 🐦📰
I've add Jorik 🐧 to "Walking through street" mini-game, and changed the Birdy's hair color.
The new version you can already download from the Birdy's Codeberg page 🏔️👉 https://codeberg.org/xolatgames/Birdy-wants-crisps/releases/tag/v1.4.2
And also, I upload it to my website soon.
See you soon! 😉👋
#cpp #cpluplus #box2d #sdl #sdl2 #codelite #cmake #cmake3 #codeberg #opensource #game #games #2d #inkscape #tiled #TiledMapEditor #appimage #gamedev #adventure #gnumake
-
Currently looking at tools to replace #snakemake for my usage (command runner + workflow manager).
well, i can't say that i'm really surprised, but this snakemake dependency is **heavy**...
and after trying a bit the other options listed here (x-axis), i still think #gnumake fits my usage the best given the size, i just need to survive the syntax... 😬
-
Currently looking at tools to replace #snakemake for my usage (command runner + workflow manager).
well, i can't say that i'm really surprised, but this snakemake dependency is **heavy**...
and after trying a bit the other options listed here (x-axis), i still think #gnumake fits my usage the best given the size, i just need to survive the syntax... 😬
-
Currently looking at tools to replace #snakemake for my usage (command runner + workflow manager).
well, i can't say that i'm really surprised, but this snakemake dependency is **heavy**...
and after trying a bit the other options listed here (x-axis), i still think #gnumake fits my usage the best given the size, i just need to survive the syntax... 😬
-
Currently looking at tools to replace #snakemake for my usage (command runner + workflow manager).
well, i can't say that i'm really surprised, but this snakemake dependency is **heavy**...
and after trying a bit the other options listed here (x-axis), i still think #gnumake fits my usage the best given the size, i just need to survive the syntax... 😬
-
Currently looking at tools to replace #snakemake for my usage (command runner + workflow manager).
well, i can't say that i'm really surprised, but this snakemake dependency is **heavy**...
and after trying a bit the other options listed here (x-axis), i still think #gnumake fits my usage the best given the size, i just need to survive the syntax... 😬
-
The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29
-
The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29
-
The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29
-
The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29
-
The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29
-
Still very annoying that `make` does not have a flag to "build all *.csv" files... 😩
(no, `make *.csv` does not work if the files don't exist yet. Yes, `make -t` will create ALL (including other) target files, not ideal)
UPDATE: `make -nt | sed 's|^touch\s*||g' | grep '\.csv$'` at least gives you all make'able `*.csv`-files, which you can then pipe into `xargs make`...
-
Still very annoying that `make` does not have a flag to "build all *.csv" files... 😩
(no, `make *.csv` does not work if the files don't exist yet. Yes, `make -t` will create ALL (including other) target files, not ideal)
UPDATE: `make -nt | sed 's|^touch\s*||g' | grep '\.csv$'` at least gives you all make'able `*.csv`-files, which you can then pipe into `xargs make`...
-
Still very annoying that `make` does not have a flag to "build all *.csv" files... 😩
(no, `make *.csv` does not work if the files don't exist yet. Yes, `make -t` will create ALL (including other) target files, not ideal)
UPDATE: `make -nt | sed 's|^touch\s*||g' | grep '\.csv$'` at least gives you all make'able `*.csv`-files, which you can then pipe into `xargs make`...
-
Still very annoying that `make` does not have a flag to "build all *.csv" files... 😩
(no, `make *.csv` does not work if the files don't exist yet. Yes, `make -t` will create ALL (including other) target files, not ideal)
UPDATE: `make -nt | sed 's|^touch\s*||g' | grep '\.csv$'` at least gives you all make'able `*.csv`-files, which you can then pipe into `xargs make`...
-
Still very annoying that `make` does not have a flag to "build all *.csv" files... 😩
(no, `make *.csv` does not work if the files don't exist yet. Yes, `make -t` will create ALL (including other) target files, not ideal)
UPDATE: `make -nt | sed 's|^touch\s*||g' | grep '\.csv$'` at least gives you all make'able `*.csv`-files, which you can then pipe into `xargs make`...
-
noch mehr Retro-Buecher
2 Buecher:
- SuSE Linux 4.2
- GNU make
- <del>Die Programmiersprache REXX</del> -
noch mehr Retro-Buecher
2 Buecher:
- SuSE Linux 4.2
- GNU make
- <del>Die Programmiersprache REXX</del> -
noch mehr Retro-Buecher
2 Buecher:
- SuSE Linux 4.2
- GNU make
- <del>Die Programmiersprache REXX</del> -
#AskFedi I currently have the following #GNUMake rule to create a todo list out of any comments in my sources
todo:
sed -i $$(grep -n "# todo" README.md | cut -d ':' -f1),\$$d README.md
echo "# todo" >> README.md
grep --line-number --only-matching --perl-regexp --recursive '(?<=^#TODO:).+' scripts/ Dockerfile.* Makefile | sort | sed 's/.*/\* &\n/' >> README.mdIs there a way I can make this work while still allowing items to be manually added to the bottom of the file? Happy to have a marker. I guess I could just have a todo2 file that's appended to this after grep.
-
#AskFedi I currently have the following #GNUMake rule to create a todo list out of any comments in my sources
todo:
sed -i $$(grep -n "# todo" README.md | cut -d ':' -f1),\$$d README.md
echo "# todo" >> README.md
grep --line-number --only-matching --perl-regexp --recursive '(?<=^#TODO:).+' scripts/ Dockerfile.* Makefile | sort | sed 's/.*/\* &\n/' >> README.mdIs there a way I can make this work while still allowing items to be manually added to the bottom of the file? Happy to have a marker. I guess I could just have a todo2 file that's appended to this after grep.
-
#AskFedi I currently have the following #GNUMake rule to create a todo list out of any comments in my sources
todo:
sed -i $$(grep -n "# todo" README.md | cut -d ':' -f1),\$$d README.md
echo "# todo" >> README.md
grep --line-number --only-matching --perl-regexp --recursive '(?<=^#TODO:).+' scripts/ Dockerfile.* Makefile | sort | sed 's/.*/\* &\n/' >> README.mdIs there a way I can make this work while still allowing items to be manually added to the bottom of the file? Happy to have a marker. I guess I could just have a todo2 file that's appended to this after grep.
-
#AskFedi I currently have the following #GNUMake rule to create a todo list out of any comments in my sources
todo:
sed -i $$(grep -n "# todo" README.md | cut -d ':' -f1),\$$d README.md
echo "# todo" >> README.md
grep --line-number --only-matching --perl-regexp --recursive '(?<=^#TODO:).+' scripts/ Dockerfile.* Makefile | sort | sed 's/.*/\* &\n/' >> README.mdIs there a way I can make this work while still allowing items to be manually added to the bottom of the file? Happy to have a marker. I guess I could just have a todo2 file that's appended to this after grep.
-
#AskFedi I currently have the following #GNUMake rule to create a todo list out of any comments in my sources
todo:
sed -i $$(grep -n "# todo" README.md | cut -d ':' -f1),\$$d README.md
echo "# todo" >> README.md
grep --line-number --only-matching --perl-regexp --recursive '(?<=^#TODO:).+' scripts/ Dockerfile.* Makefile | sort | sed 's/.*/\* &\n/' >> README.mdIs there a way I can make this work while still allowing items to be manually added to the bottom of the file? Happy to have a marker. I guess I could just have a todo2 file that's appended to this after grep.
-
OK, I opened Pandora's box. After packaging dozens of programs with Makefiles for #openSUSE, I finally gave in and bought a book to dig in deeper. Wish me luck.
-
OK, I opened Pandora's box. After packaging dozens of programs with Makefiles for #openSUSE, I finally gave in and bought a book to dig in deeper. Wish me luck.
