#maneage — Public Fediverse posts

#Reproducibility in numerical #GalaxyFormation with #Maneage [1] - ongoing lab course [2]. A 5-yr old reproducible paper (Roukema+Peper2021) [3] was not as trivially reproducible as hoped, but now seems OK in 2026 with commit 024d1f21 [4] maneage #AstroRelatedPython updates [5].

@cosmology @makhlaghi

[1] https://maneage.org

[2] https://cosmo.torun.pl/Cosmo/GalaxyFormationCourse

[3] https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.1223P = https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03742 = https://zenodo.org/records/4699702

[4] https://codeberg.org/boud/elaphrocentre/commit/17c7d9033abda74fe5e8bf029119565b8a0be2ce

[5] https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/index.php?16740

#Reproducibility in numerical #GalaxyFormation with #Maneage [1] - ongoing lab course [2]. A 5-yr old reproducible paper (Roukema+Peper2021) [3] was not as trivially reproducible as hoped, but now seems OK in 2026 with commit 024d1f21 [4] maneage #AstroRelatedPython updates [5].

@cosmology @makhlaghi

[1] https://maneage.org

[2] https://cosmo.torun.pl/Cosmo/GalaxyFormationCourse

[3] https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.1223P = https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03742 = https://zenodo.org/records/4699702

[4] https://codeberg.org/boud/elaphrocentre/commit/17c7d9033abda74fe5e8bf029119565b8a0be2ce

[5] https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/index.php?16740

#Reproducibility in numerical #GalaxyFormation with #Maneage [1] - ongoing lab course [2]. A 5-yr old reproducible paper (Roukema+Peper2021) [3] was not as trivially reproducible as hoped, but now seems OK in 2026 with commit 024d1f21 [4] maneage #AstroRelatedPython updates [5].

@cosmology @makhlaghi

[1] https://maneage.org

[2] https://cosmo.torun.pl/Cosmo/GalaxyFormationCourse

[3] https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.1223P = https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03742 = https://zenodo.org/records/4699702

[4] https://codeberg.org/boud/elaphrocentre/commit/17c7d9033abda74fe5e8bf029119565b8a0be2ce

[5] https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/index.php?16740

#Reproducibility in numerical #GalaxyFormation with #Maneage [1] - ongoing lab course [2]. A 5-yr old reproducible paper (Roukema+Peper2021) [3] was not as trivially reproducible as hoped, but now seems OK in 2026 with commit 024d1f21 [4] maneage #AstroRelatedPython updates [5].

@cosmology @makhlaghi

[1] https://maneage.org

[2] https://cosmo.torun.pl/Cosmo/GalaxyFormationCourse

[3] https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.1223P = https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03742 = https://zenodo.org/records/4699702

[4] https://codeberg.org/boud/elaphrocentre/commit/17c7d9033abda74fe5e8bf029119565b8a0be2ce

[5] https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/index.php?16740

#Reproducibility in numerical #GalaxyFormation with #Maneage [1] - ongoing lab course [2]. A 5-yr old reproducible paper (Roukema+Peper2021) [3] was not as trivially reproducible as hoped, but now seems OK in 2026 with commit 024d1f21 [4] maneage #AstroRelatedPython updates [5].

@cosmology @makhlaghi

[1] https://maneage.org

[2] https://cosmo.torun.pl/Cosmo/GalaxyFormationCourse

[3] https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.1223P = https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03742 = https://zenodo.org/records/4699702

[4] https://codeberg.org/boud/elaphrocentre/commit/17c7d9033abda74fe5e8bf029119565b8a0be2ce

[5] https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/index.php?16740

@leibnizopenscience

The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29

[2] https://gnu.org/software/make

[3] https://maneage.org

[4] https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3072860

@leibnizopenscience

The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29

[2] https://gnu.org/software/make

[3] https://maneage.org

[4] https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3072860

@leibnizopenscience

The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29

[2] https://gnu.org/software/make

[3] https://maneage.org

[4] https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3072860

@leibnizopenscience

The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29

[2] https://gnu.org/software/make

[3] https://maneage.org

[4] https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3072860

@leibnizopenscience

The paper seems to have missed a powerful workflow language: #Make [1], with #GNUMake [2] being the canonical example. It's stable and nearly half a century old. Learn and use it now and your scientific grandchildren will be able to reproduce your workflow in 2075 [3]. #Maneage [3][4] uses Make for *both* reproducible software + reproducible workflows.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_%28software%29

[2] https://gnu.org/software/make

[3] https://maneage.org

[4] https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3072860

@civodul @khinsen

We use #CosmicVoids in [1][2], which in N-body sims are traced by low num-densities of particles => high noise. Full #Maneage controls + fixed seed rng's. We still have intramachine + (higher) intermachine randomness. Statistical upper limits to results OK. But still untraced sources of randomness.

Any clues for remaining randomness [2]?

#Reproducibility #ArXiv_2304_00591 #OpenScience

[1] Frozen record: https://zenodo.org/record/7792910

[2] Live git: https://codeberg.org/mpeper/lensing

#CosmicVoids should be detectable via their #GravitationalLensing effects.
Check this starting with a floppy-disk sized source snapshot [1].
#Reproducibility is via the #Maneage template of shell+make files.
Full research paper: [2][3][4][5]

[1] https://zenodo.org/record/7792910/files/lensing-e4f7af0-snapshot.tar.gz

[2] Preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00591 #ArXiv_2304_00591

[3] Frozen record: https://zenodo.org/record/7792910

[4] Live git: https://codeberg.org/mpeper/lensing

[5] SWH: https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:rev:41507a706e16f04075c0c35853ddc226d3c72df5%3borigin=https://codeberg.org/mpeper/lensing

#Cosmology #OpenScience