#executive-orders — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #executive-orders, aggregated by home.social.
-
https://www.europesays.com/iran/179067/ The Latest: Trump says Iran violates ceasefire with drone strike | National #Courts #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #InternationalAgreements #Iran #IranWar #LegalProceedings #lgbtq #NationalSecurity #Politics #PresidentDonaldTrump #TrumpAdministration #USNews #Voting #WashingtonNews #WorldNews
-
https://www.europesays.com/news/45304/ Judge halts Trump’s order to create federal voter list #2026Elections #AbigailJackson #APTopNews #Arizona #BarackObama #Boston #Courts #DistrictOfColumbia #DonaldTrump #elections #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #Headlines #IndiraTalwani #JoeBiden #JoshShapiro #KrisMayes #Lawsuits #Massachusetts #News #Politics #ShennaBellows #StephenPezzi #TopStories #USDemocraticParty #USNews #USRepublicanParty #UnitedStatesGovernment #Voting #WashingtonNews
-
Today’s News: Trump Housing Bill, Europe Heat Wave, Military Flu Outbreak | National News
A dangerous heat wave continues to grip Europe, with record-breaking temperatures leading to deaths in France and the…
#Europe #EU #Donald #executiveorders #heat #housing #influenza #JennaRomaine #nationalnews #Politics #trump #Worldnews
https://www.europesays.com/europe/79177/ -
Federal judge bars Trump from proof of citizenship requirement to vote
A federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred Presid…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #2026elections #AbigailJackson #barackobama #Boston #citizenship #constitutionallaw #DeniseCasper #DonaldTrump #elections #executiveorders #generalnews #Kansas #LetitiaJames #massachusetts #Politics #RobBonta #theWhiteHouse #TrumpAdministration #U.S.DemocraticParty #U.S.News #voting #Votingrights #Washingtonnews
https://www.europesays.com/3086248/ -
https://www.europesays.com/news/44854/ Federal judge bars Trump from proof of citizenship requirement to vote #2026Elections #BarackObama #Boston #Citizenship #ConstitutionalLaw #DeniseCasper #DonaldTrump #elections #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #GovernmentAndPolitics #Headlines #LetitiaJames #Massachusetts #News #Politics #RobBonta #TopStories #USDemocraticParty #USNews #UnitedStatesGovernment #Voting #VotingRights #WashingtonNews
-
https://www.europesays.com/news/40089/ Federal judge blocks Trump administration’s changes to museums and parks #AlanSpears #AngelKelley #BillWade #Climate #ClimateAndEnvironment #DonaldTrump #DougBurgum #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #GeorgeWashington #GovernmentAndPolitics #GovernmentPolicy #Headlines #Lawsuits #LegalProceedings #Massachusetts #NationalParkService #News #Philadelphia #Politics #TopStories #TrumpHub #TrumpLawsuits #USNews #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesGovernment #WashingtonNews
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/110838/ Rubio announces US sanctions on Cuban state-owned oil company #Communism #cuba #ExecutiveOrders #MarcoRubio #NationalSecurity #RaulCastro #Sanctions #SecretaryOfState #StateDepartment
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/102227/ Trump Drew the Right Map for AI Oversight, but Stopped at the Trailhead #ArtificialIntelligence(ai) #ArtificialIntelligenceAndEmergingTechnologiesInitiative #cyber #Cybersecurity #EmergingTechnology #ExecutiveOrders #IntelligenceCommunity #Military #Oversight #POTUS #PresidentOfTheUnitedStates #regulation #TrumpAdministrationSecondTerm
-
https://www.europesays.com/news/36112/ Trump signs an executive order to vet top AI models for security risks #Alphabet #APTopNews #ArtificialIntelligence #Business #ChrisLehane #ClaudeMythos #DonaldTrump #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #GovernmentPolicy #Headlines #Inc #InformationTechnology #JeromePowell #JoeBiden #JuanLondoo #MarkWarner #NationalSecurity #News #OpenAIInc #Politics #ScottBessent #Technology #TopStories #USNationalSecurityAgency #WashingtonNews
-
Trump signs an executive order to vet top AI models for security risks
President Donald Trump signed a…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #Alphabet #APTopNews #artificialintelligence #business #ChrisLehane #ClaudeMythos #DonaldTrump #executiveorders #generalnews #Governmentpolicy #Inc. #Informationtechnology #JeromePowell #JoeBiden #JuanLondoo #mark-warner #Nationalsecurity #OpenAIInc #Politics #ScottBessent #technology #trump #U.S.NationalSecurityAgency #Washingtonnews
https://www.europesays.com/3035436/ -
Politico: Trump signs downsized AI order after weeks of reversals. “In a quiet action with none of his usual fanfare, Trump issued an executive order Tuesday that seeks to address the potentially catastrophic cybersecurity threats posed by artificial intelligence. But the directive calls for less-advanced government scrutiny than the White House had been set to impose last month — the AI […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/06/02/politico-trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-after-weeks-of-reversals/ -
Politico: Trump signs downsized AI order after weeks of reversals. “In a quiet action with none of his usual fanfare, Trump issued an executive order Tuesday that seeks to address the potentially catastrophic cybersecurity threats posed by artificial intelligence. But the directive calls for less-advanced government scrutiny than the White House had been set to impose last month — the AI […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/06/02/politico-trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-after-weeks-of-reversals/ -
Politico: Trump signs downsized AI order after weeks of reversals. “In a quiet action with none of his usual fanfare, Trump issued an executive order Tuesday that seeks to address the potentially catastrophic cybersecurity threats posed by artificial intelligence. But the directive calls for less-advanced government scrutiny than the White House had been set to impose last month — the AI […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/06/02/politico-trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-after-weeks-of-reversals/ -
Politico: Trump signs downsized AI order after weeks of reversals. “In a quiet action with none of his usual fanfare, Trump issued an executive order Tuesday that seeks to address the potentially catastrophic cybersecurity threats posed by artificial intelligence. But the directive calls for less-advanced government scrutiny than the White House had been set to impose last month — the AI […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/06/02/politico-trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-after-weeks-of-reversals/ -
Politico: Trump signs downsized AI order after weeks of reversals. “In a quiet action with none of his usual fanfare, Trump issued an executive order Tuesday that seeks to address the potentially catastrophic cybersecurity threats posed by artificial intelligence. But the directive calls for less-advanced government scrutiny than the White House had been set to impose last month — the AI […]
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/06/02/politico-trump-signs-downsized-ai-order-after-weeks-of-reversals/ -
https://www.europesays.com/people/96655/ Appeals court blocks Trump from expelling transgender troops #administration #DonaldTrump #ExecutiveOrders #FederalAppealsCourt #NationalCenterForLGBTQRightsLegal #PeteHegseth #servicemembers #SupremeCourt #TheTrump #TransgenderAmericans #TransgenderServiceMembers
-
Administrative Mandates and the Reality of Agency Oversight
New executive orders on ICE are being called 'political theater' because they don't change how ICE actually works. Find out what this means for enforcement.
#ICE, #ExecutiveOrders, #ImmigrationPolicy, #GovernmentOversight, #PoliticalTheater
https://newsletter.tf/ice-executive-orders-political-theater-no-real-change/
-
New executive orders related to ICE are being criticized. Experts say these orders are more about sending a message than changing actual enforcement rules.
#ICE, #ExecutiveOrders, #ImmigrationPolicy, #GovernmentOversight, #PoliticalTheater
https://newsletter.tf/ice-executive-orders-political-theater-no-real-change/ -
https://www.europesays.com/people/93504/ ThinkCareBelieve: Week 71 of the Trump Administration 2.0 #AbrahamAccords #Economy #ExecutiveOrders #GoldenAge #Government #health #Iran #maha #PeaceDeal #POTUS #PresidentOfTheUnitedStates #tariff #ThinkCareBelieve #TrumpAdministration
-
White House moves to give political appointees power over grants
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump’s administration o…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #america #domesticnews #DonaldTrump #education #executiveorders #generalnews #geopolitics #Governmentbudgets #JoeBiden #LaurelPowell #Politics #Raceandethnicity #science #subsidies #taxes #Trumphub #U.S.OfficeofManagementandBudget #unitedstatesofamerica #UnitedStatesPolitics #USPolitics #usapolitics #Washingtonnews
https://www.europesays.com/3025853/ -
https://www.europesays.com/news/34079/ Judge refuses to block Trump executive order that limits mail voting #2026Elections #APTopNews #Boston #CarlNichols #CivilRights #Courts #DCWire #DistrictOfColumbia #DonaldTrump #elections #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #GovernmentAndPolitics #Headlines #HumanRights #JoeBiden #JuanProao #Massachusetts #MidtermElections #News #Politics #TopStories #USDemocraticParty #USNews #UnitedStatesGovernment #Voting #WashingtonNews
-
CW: Selected Federal Cases
2025/03/11 Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00716, District Court, D.C.) Trump's #ExecutiveOrders are illegal. Case won 2025/05/05. DOJ starts appeal 25-5241. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69725919/perkins-coie-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00916, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5265. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807126/jenner-block-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-00917, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5277. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807328/wilmer-cutler-pickering-hale-and-dorr-llp-v-executive-office-of-the/
2025/04/11 Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-01107, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5310. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69881953/susman-godfrey-llp-v-executive-office-of-the-president/
———
2025/07/02 Perkins Coie LLP v. DOJ (25-5241, Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit) Four law firms fought Trump's illegal Executive Orders punishing them for associating with his political enemies while something like 9 others paid off Trump to get back on his good side. Four different District Judges sided with the law firms and so this is the consolidated appeal.
Just waiting now for the 3-judge panel to make a decision (predicted to be 2-1 in favor of the law firms because Rao has sided with Trump over reason and settled law before).
There's a 2-hour MP3 of the hearing.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70694462/perkins-coie-llp-v-doj/
-
CW: Selected Federal Cases
2025/03/11 Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00716, District Court, D.C.) Trump's #ExecutiveOrders are illegal. Case won 2025/05/05. DOJ starts appeal 25-5241. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69725919/perkins-coie-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00916, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5265. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807126/jenner-block-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-00917, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5277. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807328/wilmer-cutler-pickering-hale-and-dorr-llp-v-executive-office-of-the/
2025/04/11 Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-01107, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5310. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69881953/susman-godfrey-llp-v-executive-office-of-the-president/
———
2025/07/02 Perkins Coie LLP v. DOJ (25-5241, Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit) Four law firms fought Trump's illegal Executive Orders punishing them for associating with his political enemies while something like 9 others paid off Trump to get back on his good side. Four different District Judges sided with the law firms and so this is the consolidated appeal.
Just waiting now for the 3-judge panel to make a decision (predicted to be 2-1 in favor of the law firms because Rao has sided with Trump over reason and settled law before).
There's a 2-hour MP3 of the hearing.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70694462/perkins-coie-llp-v-doj/
-
CW: Selected Federal Cases
2025/03/11 Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00716, District Court, D.C.) Trump's #ExecutiveOrders are illegal. Case won 2025/05/05. DOJ starts appeal 25-5241. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69725919/perkins-coie-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00916, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5265. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807126/jenner-block-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-00917, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5277. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807328/wilmer-cutler-pickering-hale-and-dorr-llp-v-executive-office-of-the/
2025/04/11 Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-01107, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5310. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69881953/susman-godfrey-llp-v-executive-office-of-the-president/
———
2025/07/02 Perkins Coie LLP v. DOJ (25-5241, Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit) Four law firms fought Trump's illegal Executive Orders punishing them for associating with his political enemies while something like 9 others paid off Trump to get back on his good side. Four different District Judges sided with the law firms and so this is the consolidated appeal.
Just waiting now for the 3-judge panel to make a decision (predicted to be 2-1 in favor of the law firms because Rao has sided with Trump over reason and settled law before).
There's a 2-hour MP3 of the hearing.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70694462/perkins-coie-llp-v-doj/
-
CW: Selected Federal Cases
2025/03/11 Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00716, District Court, D.C.) Trump's #ExecutiveOrders are illegal. Case won 2025/05/05. DOJ starts appeal 25-5241. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69725919/perkins-coie-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00916, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5265. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807126/jenner-block-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-00917, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5277. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807328/wilmer-cutler-pickering-hale-and-dorr-llp-v-executive-office-of-the/
2025/04/11 Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-01107, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5310. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69881953/susman-godfrey-llp-v-executive-office-of-the-president/
———
2025/07/02 Perkins Coie LLP v. DOJ (25-5241, Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit) Four law firms fought Trump's illegal Executive Orders punishing them for associating with his political enemies while something like 9 others paid off Trump to get back on his good side. Four different District Judges sided with the law firms and so this is the consolidated appeal.
Just waiting now for the 3-judge panel to make a decision (predicted to be 2-1 in favor of the law firms because Rao has sided with Trump over reason and settled law before).
There's a 2-hour MP3 of the hearing.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70694462/perkins-coie-llp-v-doj/
-
CW: Selected Federal Cases
2025/03/11 Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00716, District Court, D.C.) Trump's #ExecutiveOrders are illegal. Case won 2025/05/05. DOJ starts appeal 25-5241. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69725919/perkins-coie-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. DOJ (1:25-cv-00916, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5265. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807126/jenner-block-llp-v-us-department-of-justice/
2025/03/28 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-00917, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5277. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69807328/wilmer-cutler-pickering-hale-and-dorr-llp-v-executive-office-of-the/
2025/04/11 Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President (1:25-cv-01107, District Court, D.C.) Ditto. DOJ starts appeal 25-5310. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69881953/susman-godfrey-llp-v-executive-office-of-the-president/
———
2025/07/02 Perkins Coie LLP v. DOJ (25-5241, Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit) Four law firms fought Trump's illegal Executive Orders punishing them for associating with his political enemies while something like 9 others paid off Trump to get back on his good side. Four different District Judges sided with the law firms and so this is the consolidated appeal.
Just waiting now for the 3-judge panel to make a decision (predicted to be 2-1 in favor of the law firms because Rao has sided with Trump over reason and settled law before).
There's a 2-hour MP3 of the hearing.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70694462/perkins-coie-llp-v-doj/
-
Trump postpones signing artificial intelligence order out of concern it would hurt the AI industry | Ap https://www.byteseu.com/2041000/ #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #business #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #Politics #Technology #TrumpAiExecutiveOrder #WashingtonNews
-
Donald Trump says US will take over Cuba ‘almost immediately’
President Donald Trump said Friday during remarks in Florida that the United States would take over Cuba “almost…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #American #Cuba #CubanEmbargo #DonaldTrump #executiveorder #executiveorders #Florida #havana #Iran #president #sanctions #trump #U.S.-CubanRelations #whitehouse
https://www.europesays.com/2960617/ -
https://www.europesays.com/people/53828/ Donald Trump says US will take over Cuba ‘almost immediately’ #American #cuba #CubanEmbargo #DonaldTrump #ExecutiveOrder #ExecutiveOrders #Florida #Havana #Iran #President #Sanctions #Trump #USCubanRelations #UnitedStates #WhiteHouse
-
https://www.europesays.com/es/527470/ EE UU sostiene que no necesita el aval del Congreso al dar por «terminadas» las hostilidades con Irán | Actualidad #BreakingNews #BreakingNews #ExecutiveOrders #FeaturedNews #FeaturedNews #government #Headlines #Internacional #International #InternationalNews #InternationalNews #LatestNews #LatestNews #News #Noticias #NoticiasDestacadas #NoticiasDestacadas #OvalOffice #President #Titulares #ÚltimasNoticias #ÚltimasNoticias #WhiteHouse #World #WorldNews #WorldNews
-
https://www.europesays.com/news/20476/ FDA: Three psychedelic drugs to get review following Trump directive #Business #DeborahMash #Depression #DonaldTrump #EdClay #elections #ExecutiveOrders #Fungi #GeneralNews #Headlines #Health #JdVance #JoeRogan #JohnFKennedy #MartyMakary #Medication #MentalHealth #News #PeterThiel #PublicHealth #RobertFKennedyJr #Science #TopStories #USFoodAndDrugAdministration #WashingtonNews
-
FDA: Three psychedelic drugs to get review following Trump directive
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Food and Drug Administration said Friday it will…
#NewsBeep #News #Medication #Business #DeborahMash #depression #DonaldTrump #EdClay #Elections #Executiveorders #fungi #Generalnews #Health #JDVance #JoeRogan #JohnF.Kennedy #MartyMakary #Mentalhealth #peter-thiel #Publichealth #robertf.kennedyjr. #Science #U.S.FoodandDrugAdministration #UK #UnitedKingdom #Washingtonnews
https://www.newsbeep.com/uk/548831/ -
https://www.europesays.com/uk/915881/ FDA: Three psychedelic drugs to get review following Trump directive #Business #DeborahMash #Depression #DonaldTrump #EdClay #Elections #ExecutiveOrders #fungi #GeneralNews #Health #JdVance #JoeRogan #JohnFKennedy #MartyMakary #Medication #MentalHealth #PeterThiel #PublicHealth #RobertFKennedyJr #Science #USFoodAndDrugAdministration #UK #UnitedKingdom #WashingtonNews
-
https://www.europesays.com/ie/451757/ FDA: Three psychedelic drugs to get review following Trump directive #APTopNews #Business #Depression #DonaldTrump #EdClay #Éire #Elections #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #Health #IE #Ireland #JDVance #JoeRogan #JohnFKennedy #Medication #MentalHealth #PeterThiel #politics #PublicHealth #RobertFKennedyJr #Science #USFoodAndDrugAdministration #WashingtonNews
-
Facebook users share AI-generated video of Trump at Walter Reed
Two weeks after unfounded rumors said President Donald Trump suffered a…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #ai-generatedvideo #artificialintelligence #digitalwatermark #DonaldTrump #executiveorders #facebook #Factcheck #fakevideo #falseclaim #hospital #mcnd #militarymedicalcenter #misinformation #phoneinterview #policymeeting #socialmedia #SynthID #trump #TruthSocial #visualdeception #WalterReed #whitehouse
https://www.europesays.com/2936275/ -
US Cyber Strategy Advances with Executive Orders on Horizon
The US national cyber strategy is gaining momentum, with National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross confirming that its execution is actively underway. Executive orders are likely on the horizon, leaving us wondering what's next and who will lead the charge.
#NationalCyberStrategy #ExecutiveOrders #UsGovernment #CyberPolicy #EmergingThreats
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/9600/ Trump’s go-it-alone presidency confronts clear limits during wartime #Courts #DistrictOfColumbia #DonaldTrump #EmmanuelMacron #EnergyIndustry #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #Iran #IranWar #JohnBolton #JohnThune #KeirStarmer #NorthAtlanticTreatyOrganization #OilAndGasIndustry #PoliticalEndorsements #Politics #POTUS #PresidentOfTheUnitedStates #StraitOfHormuz #USRepublicanParty #UnitedStates #WashingtonNews #WorldNews
-
https://www.europesays.com/iran/51758/ Trump’s go-it-alone presidency confronts clear limits during wartime #Courts #DistrictOfColumbia #DonaldTrump #EmmanuelMacron #EnergyIndustry #ExecutiveOrders #GeneralNews #Iran #IranWar #JohnBolton #JohnThune #KeirStarmer #NorthAtlanticTreatyOrganization #OilAndGasIndustry #PoliticalEndorsements #Politics #StraitOfHormuz #USRepublicanParty #UnitedStates #WashingtonNews #WorldNews
-
Trump’s go-it-alone certainty confronts the uncertainties of war
{‘ap_id’: ‘c5f6cba859417ad1a6997b422a6f9d43’, ‘byline’: ‘Associated Press’, ‘ap_version’: 1, ‘apProducts’: [{‘product_id’: 42433, ‘station’: ‘1010wins’, ‘section_front’: ‘news/politics’, ‘name’: ‘AP Top News…
#Politics #courts #Energyindustry #executiveorders #generalnews #iranwar #Oilandgasindustry #Politicalendorsements #w #Washingtonnews #WorldNews
https://www.europesays.com/2895766/ -
Trump gave Moms for Liberty a voice in the White House
Her presence at the White House underscores the meteoric rise of a group that made its name in…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #Conservatism #education #executiveorders #Genderinsports #generalnews #Governmentpolicy #LGBTQ #Politics #SchoolBoards #schools #theWhiteHouse #TrumpAdministration #U.S.News #Washingtonnews
https://www.europesays.com/2894746/ -
A look at birthright citizenship, and how it’s seen around the world
The Supreme Court is once again hearing arguments on whether President Donald Trump can deny citizenship to …
#NewsBeep #News #Headlines #Australia #Courts #DCWire #DistrictofColumbia #DonaldTrump #Europe #Executiveorders #Generalnews #Germany #Governmentandpolitics #Immigration #NewHampshire #NHStateWire #Politics #SupremeCourtoftheUnitedStates #UnitedStates #Us #USA #Washingtonnews #Worldnews
https://www.newsbeep.com/461821/ -
More coverage of Friday's appellate briefs from the four #LawFirms who stood up for the #Constitution against the tyranny of Trump's extortionate #ExecutiveOrders.
• (paywallled) https://www.law360.com/articles/2458839 "Firms Targeted By Trump Urge DC Circ. To Uphold EO Rulings"
How is it this terse and hard to unpack? Does... does Law360 think they are print journalism?
• https://www.jdjournal.com/2026/03/30/law-firms-urge-court-to-uphold-block-on-trump-orders/ — A great example of how trying to sound fair to both sides can minimize the fact that one side is completely crazypants, is an affront to the Constitution, and is willing to drag us all to hell. SNAFU.
I guess we're lucky that anyone in the "view from nowhere" camp even covered Friday's briefs because it's not getting a lot over coverage from the big networks with more visible failures like the elective war based on overdependence on AIs trained to be echo chambers replacing critical thought and Trump deciding first to put untrained ICE agents in airports to "help" TSA without a plan and then deciding that if the Constitution says he has to negotiate with Congress then laws mean nothing.
> Biglaw To D.C. Circuit: This Isn’t Just About Us — It’s About Whether The President Can Put Lawyers On A Leash
> Susman, Jenner, Perkins, and Wilmer say the executive orders are retaliatory, abusive, and very much not okay.
Now that's the headline I want to see.
And the author, Kathryn Rubino, ends the piece showing she and the law firms knows what's at stake:
> The question isn’t whether Biglaw can survive; it’s whether the legal system, as we understand it, can.
But, I guess Liz Dye is busy, because there could always be room for sharper language. :)
-
More coverage of Friday's appellate briefs from the four #LawFirms who stood up for the #Constitution against the tyranny of Trump's extortionate #ExecutiveOrders.
• (paywallled) https://www.law360.com/articles/2458839 "Firms Targeted By Trump Urge DC Circ. To Uphold EO Rulings"
How is it this terse and hard to unpack? Does... does Law360 think they are print journalism?
• https://www.jdjournal.com/2026/03/30/law-firms-urge-court-to-uphold-block-on-trump-orders/ — A great example of how trying to sound fair to both sides can minimize the fact that one side is completely crazypants, is an affront to the Constitution, and is willing to drag us all to hell. SNAFU.
I guess we're lucky that anyone in the "view from nowhere" camp even covered Friday's briefs because it's not getting a lot over coverage from the big networks with more visible failures like the elective war based on overdependence on AIs trained to be echo chambers replacing critical thought and Trump deciding first to put untrained ICE agents in airports to "help" TSA without a plan and then deciding that if the Constitution says he has to negotiate with Congress then laws mean nothing.
> Biglaw To D.C. Circuit: This Isn’t Just About Us — It’s About Whether The President Can Put Lawyers On A Leash
> Susman, Jenner, Perkins, and Wilmer say the executive orders are retaliatory, abusive, and very much not okay.
Now that's the headline I want to see.
And the author, Kathryn Rubino, ends the piece showing she and the law firms knows what's at stake:
> The question isn’t whether Biglaw can survive; it’s whether the legal system, as we understand it, can.
But, I guess Liz Dye is busy, because there could always be room for sharper language. :)
-
More coverage of Friday's appellate briefs from the four #LawFirms who stood up for the #Constitution against the tyranny of Trump's extortionate #ExecutiveOrders.
• (paywallled) https://www.law360.com/articles/2458839 "Firms Targeted By Trump Urge DC Circ. To Uphold EO Rulings"
How is it this terse and hard to unpack? Does... does Law360 think they are print journalism?
• https://www.jdjournal.com/2026/03/30/law-firms-urge-court-to-uphold-block-on-trump-orders/ — A great example of how trying to sound fair to both sides can minimize the fact that one side is completely crazypants, is an affront to the Constitution, and is willing to drag us all to hell. SNAFU.
I guess we're lucky that anyone in the "view from nowhere" camp even covered Friday's briefs because it's not getting a lot over coverage from the big networks with more visible failures like the elective war based on overdependence on AIs trained to be echo chambers replacing critical thought and Trump deciding first to put untrained ICE agents in airports to "help" TSA without a plan and then deciding that if the Constitution says he has to negotiate with Congress then laws mean nothing.
> Biglaw To D.C. Circuit: This Isn’t Just About Us — It’s About Whether The President Can Put Lawyers On A Leash
> Susman, Jenner, Perkins, and Wilmer say the executive orders are retaliatory, abusive, and very much not okay.
Now that's the headline I want to see.
And the author, Kathryn Rubino, ends the piece showing she and the law firms knows what's at stake:
> The question isn’t whether Biglaw can survive; it’s whether the legal system, as we understand it, can.
But, I guess Liz Dye is busy, because there could always be room for sharper language. :)
-
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
Now the #LawFirms that went 4-0 defeating the #ExecutiveOrders in the District Courts have filed their appellate briefs on 2026/03/27.
#WilmerHale:
• The Executive Order is unconstitutional and ultra vires from stem to stern, from retaliatory motive to (lack of) methodology or support in statute.
• The Article III judges rule what constitutes wrongful filings, not the President. Also, many of those filings won. Is Trump tired of (us) winning?
• Not only is the blanket security revocation an impermissible act but it was reversed at law firms that capitulated and therefore obviously done for improper, extortionate, purpose. Previously, the Government said that these were blanket revocations given to law firms, so it is too late and too far a stretch to claim *now* that they were individualized.
• The preamble can't be severed from the order when it is the organizing principle for the extortion scheme.#JennerBlock:
• First Amendment forbids retaliation for associating with the President's political enemies.
• Everything that isn't retaliation is a fig leaf of post-hoc pretext (23 words of pretext and 200+ words of Trump's grievances).
• Blanket security clearance revocation with a promise to look for cause in a later review isn't individualized judgment (as required by the 1st, and 5th Amendments) it is just retaliation without facts or permissible method. This decision is improper and subject to court review. -
First day Executive Orders for next President -
1. Rescind all Executive Orders from past President.
2. Disband ICE.
3. Rename Kennedy Centre - assuming it’s still there and not replaced by a Trump Tower.
3. Demolish whatever exists of Ballroom.Then get to the rest…
#usa #president2028 #executiveorders #ICE #kennedycenter #whitehouse #ballroom
-
First day Executive Orders for next President -
1. Rescind all Executive Orders from past President.
2. Disband ICE.
3. Rename Kennedy Centre - assuming it’s still there and not replaced by a Trump Tower.
3. Demolish whatever exists of Ballroom.Then get to the rest…
#usa #president2028 #executiveorders #ICE #kennedycenter #whitehouse #ballroom
-
First day Executive Orders for next President -
1. Rescind all Executive Orders from past President.
2. Disband ICE.
3. Rename Kennedy Centre - assuming it’s still there and not replaced by a Trump Tower.
3. Demolish whatever exists of Ballroom.Then get to the rest…
#usa #president2028 #executiveorders #ICE #kennedycenter #whitehouse #ballroom
-
First day Executive Orders for next President -
1. Rescind all Executive Orders from past President.
2. Disband ICE.
3. Rename Kennedy Centre - assuming it’s still there and not replaced by a Trump Tower.
3. Demolish whatever exists of Ballroom.Then get to the rest…
#usa #president2028 #executiveorders #ICE #kennedycenter #whitehouse #ballroom
-
Previously, I wrote:
> Regarding the security clearance revocation, we have only the #DOJ brief, but it reads a bit more seriously than the rest.
But that's because the #Trump DOJ is hammering on the language of Department of Navy v. Egan (1988) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ and Lee v. Garland (2024) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/20-5221/20-5221-2024-10-29.html with all the bluster of a con artist or chat bot in a self-reinforcement loop. But both those cases were predicated on the presumption of regularity — that the appropriate agency, following procedure, undertook a careful determination and the review of which is a nonjusticiable political question. Trump's four #ExecutiveOrders make it clear that none of that happened and all of this is retaliation for not capitulating. And NRA v. Vullo (2024) https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-842 seems to say that is coercion in violation of the First Amendment.
So #MikeMasnick argues https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/09/doj-un-drops-its-appeal-against-law-firms-files-brief-that-gets-the-first-amendment-exactly-backwards/
> The brief actually cites NRA v. Vullo, .... The Supreme Court held —unanimously — that government officials using their regulatory authority to punish or suppress disfavored private speech can violate the First Amendment, even if the official frames their actions in terms of legitimate regulatory interests.
...
> Vullo actually undercuts their entire argument. The point of the Vullo framework is that when government speech is coupled with government action designed to punish disfavored private expression, the combination can be unconstitutional coercion. The administration [tries the ruse of] ”Section 1 is just government speech.” That’s precisely the move Vullo says you can’t get away with.
So maybe that security clearance revocation is just as much Jello as Trump's Florida lawsuit against the BBC.
-
Previously, I wrote:
> Regarding the security clearance revocation, we have only the #DOJ brief, but it reads a bit more seriously than the rest.
But that's because the #Trump DOJ is hammering on the language of Department of Navy v. Egan (1988) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ and Lee v. Garland (2024) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/20-5221/20-5221-2024-10-29.html with all the bluster of a con artist or chat bot in a self-reinforcement loop. But both those cases were predicated on the presumption of regularity — that the appropriate agency, following procedure, undertook a careful determination and the review of which is a nonjusticiable political question. Trump's four #ExecutiveOrders make it clear that none of that happened and all of this is retaliation for not capitulating. And NRA v. Vullo (2024) https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-842 seems to say that is coercion in violation of the First Amendment.
So #MikeMasnick argues https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/09/doj-un-drops-its-appeal-against-law-firms-files-brief-that-gets-the-first-amendment-exactly-backwards/
> The brief actually cites NRA v. Vullo, .... The Supreme Court held —unanimously — that government officials using their regulatory authority to punish or suppress disfavored private speech can violate the First Amendment, even if the official frames their actions in terms of legitimate regulatory interests.
...
> Vullo actually undercuts their entire argument. The point of the Vullo framework is that when government speech is coupled with government action designed to punish disfavored private expression, the combination can be unconstitutional coercion. The administration [tries the ruse of] ”Section 1 is just government speech.” That’s precisely the move Vullo says you can’t get away with.
So maybe that security clearance revocation is just as much Jello as Trump's Florida lawsuit against the BBC.
-
Previously, I wrote:
> Regarding the security clearance revocation, we have only the #DOJ brief, but it reads a bit more seriously than the rest.
But that's because the #Trump DOJ is hammering on the language of Department of Navy v. Egan (1988) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ and Lee v. Garland (2024) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/20-5221/20-5221-2024-10-29.html with all the bluster of a con artist or chat bot in a self-reinforcement loop. But both those cases were predicated on the presumption of regularity — that the appropriate agency, following procedure, undertook a careful determination and the review of which is a nonjusticiable political question. Trump's four #ExecutiveOrders make it clear that none of that happened and all of this is retaliation for not capitulating. And NRA v. Vullo (2024) https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-842 seems to say that is coercion in violation of the First Amendment.
So #MikeMasnick argues https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/09/doj-un-drops-its-appeal-against-law-firms-files-brief-that-gets-the-first-amendment-exactly-backwards/
> The brief actually cites NRA v. Vullo, .... The Supreme Court held —unanimously — that government officials using their regulatory authority to punish or suppress disfavored private speech can violate the First Amendment, even if the official frames their actions in terms of legitimate regulatory interests.
...
> Vullo actually undercuts their entire argument. The point of the Vullo framework is that when government speech is coupled with government action designed to punish disfavored private expression, the combination can be unconstitutional coercion. The administration [tries the ruse of] ”Section 1 is just government speech.” That’s precisely the move Vullo says you can’t get away with.
So maybe that security clearance revocation is just as much Jello as Trump's Florida lawsuit against the BBC.
-
Previously, I wrote:
> Regarding the security clearance revocation, we have only the #DOJ brief, but it reads a bit more seriously than the rest.
But that's because the #Trump DOJ is hammering on the language of Department of Navy v. Egan (1988) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ and Lee v. Garland (2024) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/20-5221/20-5221-2024-10-29.html with all the bluster of a con artist or chat bot in a self-reinforcement loop. But both those cases were predicated on the presumption of regularity — that the appropriate agency, following procedure, undertook a careful determination and the review of which is a nonjusticiable political question. Trump's four #ExecutiveOrders make it clear that none of that happened and all of this is retaliation for not capitulating. And NRA v. Vullo (2024) https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-842 seems to say that is coercion in violation of the First Amendment.
So #MikeMasnick argues https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/09/doj-un-drops-its-appeal-against-law-firms-files-brief-that-gets-the-first-amendment-exactly-backwards/
> The brief actually cites NRA v. Vullo, .... The Supreme Court held —unanimously — that government officials using their regulatory authority to punish or suppress disfavored private speech can violate the First Amendment, even if the official frames their actions in terms of legitimate regulatory interests.
...
> Vullo actually undercuts their entire argument. The point of the Vullo framework is that when government speech is coupled with government action designed to punish disfavored private expression, the combination can be unconstitutional coercion. The administration [tries the ruse of] ”Section 1 is just government speech.” That’s precisely the move Vullo says you can’t get away with.
So maybe that security clearance revocation is just as much Jello as Trump's Florida lawsuit against the BBC.
-
Here we go. #Anthropic sues the Government for labeling it a security risk out of animus. #WilmerHale, one of the #LawFirms that stood up to #Trump's bullying #ExecutiveOrders now gets paid to explain again that the government doesn't get to have hurt feelings.
Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War (California N.D. 26-cv-01996) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72379655/anthropic-pbc-v-us-department-of-war/
Five counts, one theme — animus omnia vitiat:
Count I — APA / 10 U.S.C. § 3252 — The "supply chain risk" designation doesn't follow the statute or the facts.
Count II — First Amendment Retaliation — "AI shouldn't autonomously kill people" is protected speech.
Count III — Ultra Vires / Article II — No law lets a President destroy a company by social media post.
Count IV — Fifth Amendment Due Process — You can't de facto debar someone with no notice, no hearing, no findings.
Count V — APA § 558 — Agencies can't impose sanctions outside their delegated authority.
The Trump Administration had a temper tantrum and said "You're not the boss of me, I'm the boss of you. I'll end you!". Anthropic points out that animus is no substitute for #RuleOfLaw.
So why did they sue #Hegseth's #DepartmentOfWar rather than the statutory #DepartmentOfDefense? Because Trump authorized the name, because it shows respect to #Hegseth's sensitive feelings, and because it underscores the ridiculousness of the government tasking #AI to kill (and surveil) people autonomously. #skynet! On the off-chance the judge orders a caption change, their hands are clean and the lawyer's can't point to any act of defiance.
-
Here we go. #Anthropic sues the Government for labeling it a security risk out of animus. #WilmerHale, one of the #LawFirms that stood up to #Trump's bullying #ExecutiveOrders now gets paid to explain again that the government doesn't get to have hurt feelings.
Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War (California N.D. 26-cv-01996) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72379655/anthropic-pbc-v-us-department-of-war/
Five counts, one theme — animus omnia vitiat:
Count I — APA / 10 U.S.C. § 3252 — The "supply chain risk" designation doesn't follow the statute or the facts.
Count II — First Amendment Retaliation — "AI shouldn't autonomously kill people" is protected speech.
Count III — Ultra Vires / Article II — No law lets a President destroy a company by social media post.
Count IV — Fifth Amendment Due Process — You can't de facto debar someone with no notice, no hearing, no findings.
Count V — APA § 558 — Agencies can't impose sanctions outside their delegated authority.
The Trump Administration had a temper tantrum and said "You're not the boss of me, I'm the boss of you. I'll end you!". Anthropic points out that animus is no substitute for #RuleOfLaw.
So why did they sue #Hegseth's #DepartmentOfWar rather than the statutory #DepartmentOfDefense? Because Trump authorized the name, because it shows respect to #Hegseth's sensitive feelings, and because it underscores the ridiculousness of the government tasking #AI to kill (and surveil) people autonomously. #skynet! On the off-chance the judge orders a caption change, their hands are clean and the lawyer's can't point to any act of defiance.
-
Here we go. #Anthropic sues the Government for labeling it a security risk out of animus. #WilmerHale, one of the #LawFirms that stood up to #Trump's bullying #ExecutiveOrders now gets paid to explain again that the government doesn't get to have hurt feelings.
Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War (California N.D. 26-cv-01996) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72379655/anthropic-pbc-v-us-department-of-war/
Five counts, one theme — animus omnia vitiat:
Count I — APA / 10 U.S.C. § 3252 — The "supply chain risk" designation doesn't follow the statute or the facts.
Count II — First Amendment Retaliation — "AI shouldn't autonomously kill people" is protected speech.
Count III — Ultra Vires / Article II — No law lets a President destroy a company by social media post.
Count IV — Fifth Amendment Due Process — You can't de facto debar someone with no notice, no hearing, no findings.
Count V — APA § 558 — Agencies can't impose sanctions outside their delegated authority.
The Trump Administration had a temper tantrum and said "You're not the boss of me, I'm the boss of you. I'll end you!". Anthropic points out that animus is no substitute for #RuleOfLaw.
So why did they sue #Hegseth's #DepartmentOfWar rather than the statutory #DepartmentOfDefense? Because Trump authorized the name, because it shows respect to #Hegseth's sensitive feelings, and because it underscores the ridiculousness of the government tasking #AI to kill (and surveil) people autonomously. #skynet! On the off-chance the judge orders a caption change, their hands are clean and the lawyer's can't point to any act of defiance.
-
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/48126931/donald-trump-plans-executive-order-solve-every-problem-raised-college-sports-panel
#Trump thinks #executiveorders can solve anything like a dictator issuing #edicts. He also thinks he's the emperor of the USA. Just what we fought against in the revolution.