#bibliography — Public Fediverse posts

🌞 JabRef 6.0 Alpha 6 released! 🌞

We are thrilled to announce a new alpha version! The version is formally an alpha but stable enough for usage.

Highlights:

- Revamped notifications and pop-up
- Improved generation and handling of inserted citations in LibreOffice
- Improved inspections for #biblatex and #bibtex

https://blog.jabref.org/2026/05/14/JabRef6-0-alpha6/

#javafx #bibliography #academia #citations #TexLatex #academic #opensource #research

@foojay @frankdelporte

🌞 JabRef 6.0 Alpha 6 released! 🌞

We are thrilled to announce a new alpha version! The version is formally an alpha but stable enough for usage.

Highlights:

- Revamped notifications and pop-up
- Improved generation and handling of inserted citations in LibreOffice
- Improved inspections for #biblatex and #bibtex

https://blog.jabref.org/2026/05/14/JabRef6-0-alpha6/

#javafx #bibliography #academia #citations #TexLatex #academic #opensource #research

@foojay @frankdelporte

🌞 JabRef 6.0 Alpha 6 released! 🌞

We are thrilled to announce a new alpha version! The version is formally an alpha but stable enough for usage.

Highlights:

- Revamped notifications and pop-up
- Improved generation and handling of inserted citations in LibreOffice
- Improved inspections for #biblatex and #bibtex

https://blog.jabref.org/2026/05/14/JabRef6-0-alpha6/

#javafx #bibliography #academia #citations #TexLatex #academic #opensource #research

@foojay @frankdelporte

🌞 JabRef 6.0 Alpha 6 released! 🌞

We are thrilled to announce a new alpha version! The version is formally an alpha but stable enough for usage.

Highlights:

- Revamped notifications and pop-up
- Improved generation and handling of inserted citations in LibreOffice
- Improved inspections for #biblatex and #bibtex

https://blog.jabref.org/2026/05/14/JabRef6-0-alpha6/

#javafx #bibliography #academia #citations #TexLatex #academic #opensource #research

@foojay @frankdelporte

🌞 JabRef 6.0 Alpha 6 released! 🌞

We are thrilled to announce a new alpha version! The version is formally an alpha but stable enough for usage.

Highlights:

- Revamped notifications and pop-up
- Improved generation and handling of inserted citations in LibreOffice
- Improved inspections for #biblatex and #bibtex

https://blog.jabref.org/2026/05/14/JabRef6-0-alpha6/

#javafx #bibliography #academia #citations #TexLatex #academic #opensource #research

@foojay @frankdelporte

General Bibliography - General public bibliography for EOU and related research. #bibliography #dataset - https://www.earth.org.uk/bibliography.html

We have updated our bibliography 📚

Check out our upcoming releases 🤩😮‍💨

Stay tuned to our social media channels for updates and subscribe to our newsletter: www.bitmap.news 🗞️

View our bibliography here: https://www.bitmapbooks.com/pages/bibliography

#bitmapbooks #books #upcomingrelease #bibliography #bookstodon

General Bibliography - General public bibliography for EOU and related research. #bibliography #dataset - https://www.earth.org.uk/bibliography.html

We are excited that we are participating in #GSOC2026 with 3 projects:

- "Improved handling of older documents with OCR and AI-powered tools."

- "Improved #LibreOffice -JabRef integration" with one particular aspect of compatibility with other reference managers.

- "Improving startup times for JabKit" by leveraging the power of #GraalVM

#javafx #jabref #academia #bibtex #TexLatex #opensource #bibliography
cc  @frankdelporte @foojay

#neu & #OpenAccess:
"Collaboration, Technologies, and the History of Shakespearean Bibliography"
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009614108
"This Element traces the history of Shakespearean #bibliography from its earliest days to the present. With an emphasis on how we enumerate and find scholarship about #Shakespeare, this Element argues that understanding bibliographies is foundational to how we research Shakespeare. […]"

The Invisible Infrastructure of Academic Publishing

A JabRef contributor wrote this nice article for his university course:
https://kai505.medium.com/the-invisible-infrastructure-of-academic-publishing-48772c9606f8

#texlatex #jabref #bibtex #academia #bibliography

Do you use #LIbreOffice together with #JabRef and want to have an easy way to convert citations and references to plaintext and vice versa?
We have now published our first LibreOffice extension, originally developed by @teertrinker and extended by the JabRef maintainers.
Check it out under:

https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/99532

#academia #opensource #references #citations #bibliography
cc @fiduswriter Might be interesting for you as well

In the spirit of this year’s Winter Olympics 🇮🇹 ❄️ 🏟️, we are proud to announce a winner as well: A new JabRef version…

We are excited to announce the new alpha 5 of JabRef.

As already written in an earlier post, it now features the new citations fetched from OpenCitation and OpenAlex.

Another new cool feature is now the download of book cover images.
Of course, we also fixed the usual bugs.

https://blog.jabref.org/2026/02/22/JabRef6-0-alpha5/

#javafx #bibtex #academia #bibliography #opensource #openalex #texlateX #java

Happy Valentine's Day, and more important, today is "I Love Free Software Day! The day to express gratitude to all those #opensource contributors.

And of course we would like to thank all people who contribute to #JabRef in so many ways. This keeps us motivated.

#javafx #java #bibliography #texlaTeX #latex #bibtex #academia #academic
#Freesoftware #FreieSoftware

Compare BibTeX and BibLaTeX for LaTeX bibliography management, covering architecture, features, performance, and best practices for modern and legacy workflows.

#BibTeX #BibLaTeX #Biber #LaTeX #bibliography management

https://dasroot.net/posts/2026/02/latex-bibliography-bibtex-vs-biblatex-comparison/

In the latest development version, JabRef now supports multiple citation fetchers/providers, including SemanticScholar, @crossref @opencitations and @OpenAlex

And at the bottom we provide some additional metrics from scite.ai

Grab the version here: https://builds.jabref.org/main/

PS: This version now uses also JavaFX 25.02 and JDK 25.02.

#JabRef #citations #references #bibliography #academia
#javafx

@petebachant NIce, and for your #bibliography you can now do the same with #JabRef as well. We integrated pushing to #git as well in the most recent version

Happy Holidays!

Here is a late present for you: We just released Version 6.0.alpha4.
This release contains a couple of UX improvements, a handful of new features, and the usual bug fixes.
A brand new feature is now the support for date groups based on any date field. Also supports year, timestamp fields, etc.

For more info, check out our blog post and the changelog!

https://blog.jabref.org/2025/12/26/JabRef6-0-alpha4/

#javafx #java #academia #opensource #bibliography #biblatex #bibtex #texlaTeX
@foojay @frankdelporte

#MarcXML encapsulated as a string in #JSON is a pain to work with as I am finding out trying to query #HathiTrust APIs for digitised items with a list of #OCLC numbers obtained via #SPARQL from #Wikidata.

Things I wish for:

1. direct access to the MARCXML from HathiTrust
2. a publicly accessible API for #Worldcat / OCLC to find holdings

#DigitalHumanities #libraries #metadata #bibliography

We have an early present for you!
Leveraging JabRef's brand new Git integration, it's now possible to directly sync your bibliography with Overleaf by using GitHub as an intermediate.

We have written a short description in our blog post on how to get started.
Currently, only one-way sync is possible!
https://blog.jabref.org/2025/12/04/overleaf-support/

#JabRef #bibtex #overleaf #texlaTeX #bibliography #academia #git #gitHub
#javafx

We have an early present for you!
Leveraging JabRef's brand new Git integration, it's now possible to directly sync your bibliography with Overleaf by using GitHub as an intermediate.

We have written a short description in our blog post on how to get started.
Currently, only one-way sync is possible!
https://blog.jabref.org/2025/12/04/overleaf-support/

#JabRef #bibtex #overleaf #texlaTeX #bibliography #academia #git #gitHub
#javafx

We have an early present for you!
Leveraging JabRef's brand new Git integration, it's now possible to directly sync your bibliography with Overleaf by using GitHub as an intermediate.

We have written a short description in our blog post on how to get started.
Currently, only one-way sync is possible!
https://blog.jabref.org/2025/12/04/overleaf-support/

#JabRef #bibtex #overleaf #texlaTeX #bibliography #academia #git #gitHub
#javafx

We have an early present for you!
Leveraging JabRef's brand new Git integration, it's now possible to directly sync your bibliography with Overleaf by using GitHub as an intermediate.

We have written a short description in our blog post on how to get started.
Currently, only one-way sync is possible!
https://blog.jabref.org/2025/12/04/overleaf-support/

#JabRef #bibtex #overleaf #texlaTeX #bibliography #academia #git #gitHub
#javafx

We have an early present for you!
Leveraging JabRef's brand new Git integration, it's now possible to directly sync your bibliography with Overleaf by using GitHub as an intermediate.

We have written a short description in our blog post on how to get started.
Currently, only one-way sync is possible!
https://blog.jabref.org/2025/12/04/overleaf-support/

#JabRef #bibtex #overleaf #texlaTeX #bibliography #academia #git #gitHub
#javafx

Autopens, Executive Orders, and the Rule of Law – A DWD Special Report

Autopens, Executive Orders, and the Rule of Law

What really happens when one president tries to erase another’s signature?

Donald Trump has announced that he is cancelling all executive orders and “anything else” from the Biden administration that were signed using an autopen, claiming those documents are invalid and even hinting at perjury charges if Joe Biden says he personally authorized them. The move has thrilled some supporters and outraged critics, but beneath the rhetoric is a basic question of law:

• Are autopen-signed executive orders legally valid?
• Can a sitting president simply declare them void?

On both counts, the short answer from mainstream legal analysis is: autopens are lawful, and Trump’s blanket cancellation theory is on very thin ice.

Editor’s Note: The analysis here is by Perplexity Plus, and my review and edits. Here’s a sample article that announces Trump’s actions. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-cancels-biden-orders-signed-autopen –there are several. So let’s deep dive a bit…

What Trump Is Claiming

In recent statements and social posts, Trump has argued that a huge share of Biden’s executive actions were signed not by Biden’s own hand but by an autopen—essentially a mechanical signature device—and that these are therefore “null and void.” He has suggested that aides, not Biden, made the decisions and that if Biden now claims personal involvement he could face perjury charges.

That claim rests on two big leaps:

1. That the physical act of handwriting the signature is required for legality;
2. That using an autopen inherently proves the president wasn’t really the decision-maker.

Both propositions collide head-on with modern practice and with existing legal opinions from the Justice Department.

What Is an Autopen and Why Has It Been Used?

An autopen is a device that reproduces a person’s signature with real ink. It is not new, and it is not unique to Biden. Presidents from at least George W. Bush onward have authorized autopen signatures on official correspondence, and Barack Obama famously used an autopen to sign a Patriot Act extension while traveling abroad, based on prior legal clearance from the Department of Justice.

The core idea is simple: the decision must be the president’s; the ink stroke can be delegated to a machine, as long as it is done under his direction.

Are Autopen-Signed Orders Legal?

Yes. The key legal backdrop is a 2005 opinion from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). In that memo, OLC concluded that the president may “sign” a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution by directing a subordinate to affix his signature—explicitly including use of an autopen—so long as the president has made the underlying decision and authorized the signature.

That logic carries over to executive orders and other presidential instruments. The law cares about:

• Who made the decision? — The president cannot delegate the actual decision to approve or disapprove.
• How is that decision manifested? — The physical act of writing the name can be delegated or mechanized.

In other words, an autopen signature authorized by the president is treated as the president’s signature. The courts, Congress, and multiple administrations have proceeded on that assumption for nearly two decades. If Trump were to argue that autopen use is categorically invalid, he would be challenging not only Biden’s practice, but settled executive-branch legal interpretation and a bipartisan history of use—including his own administration’s reliance on mechanical signing for lower-stakes documents.

Can a President Revoke a Predecessor’s Executive Orders?

Here Trump’s position is on firmer, but still limited, ground. As a general rule, any sitting president may:

• Amend,
• Rescind, or
• Replace

executive orders issued by a prior administration, so long as he stays within constitutional and statutory limits. Executive orders are internal directives for the executive branch; they are not statutes and do not bind a successor president forever. That’s why one administration can undo or rewrite the regulatory priorities of another.

So, yes: Trump can revoke Biden-era executive orders as a matter of policy choice. We’ve already seen him move to roll back or rewrite specific Biden orders. Future litigation will focus on what he does in the substance of those revocations, not the mere fact that he did them.

What is novel—and shaky—is his attempt to tie the legality of those orders to the method of signature and to retroactively declare large swaths of them void because they were signed by autopen.

The Problem with Retroactive “Autopen” Invalidation

Trump’s announced approach tries to do something different from the normal policy-based revocation of executive orders. Instead of saying “I disagree with these policies and am replacing them,” he suggests:

These orders were never valid in the first place, because they were signed with an autopen, so I am cancelling them as illegal and potentially criminal.

That creates several rule-of-law problems:

1. It contradicts existing legal guidance. OLC’s 2005 opinion and subsequent practices assume autopen signatures are valid when authorized by the president. Calling them inherently “forged” would require either repudiating that legal framework or proving that Biden never authorized the decisions.
2. It is retroactive. For years, agencies, states, and private parties have relied on those Biden orders as valid. Retroactively invalidating them on a technicality invites chaos in programs, contracts, and rights that grew up under those orders.
3. It is categorical, not case-by-case. Instead of alleging specific instances of fraud (“this particular order was not actually authorized by Biden”), the rhetoric paints nearly all autopen-signed actions as suspect. Courts usually prefer tailored remedies, not sweeping retrospective erasures.
4. It looks politically targeted. The move singles out one predecessor, on a theory that—if truly accepted—would raise questions about other administrations’ autopen practices as well. The selectivity underscores the political, rather than legal, impulse.

How Would Courts Look at This?

If lawsuits follow—and they almost certainly would—courts are unlikely to start by deciding whether they like Biden or Trump. They will ask:

• Was the original executive order within the president’s lawful authority?
• Did the president (Biden) actually approve the action?
• Is the current president (Trump) acting within his authority in revoking or refusing to recognize the order?

On the first two questions, the existence of a longstanding OLC opinion and decades of executive practice with autopens will weigh heavily in favor of validity. On the third question, courts generally accept that presidents can revoke prior executive orders—but not that they can rewrite history to say those orders never legally existed if they were properly authorized at the time.

The Supreme Court has also shown institutional concern for stability in government operations. Even justices skeptical of “administrative overreach” have not shown much appetite for retroactively vaporizing large categories of past acts based on novel procedural theories. Doing so here could destabilize not only Biden-era orders but potentially any action signed via autopen going forward.

What About Pardons and Other Acts?

Trump and some allies have also gestured at Biden’s clemency decisions, suggesting that pardons or commutations bearing an autopen signature might be revisited. Here the law is even clearer:

• Once a valid presidential pardon is issued, it is generally understood to be final and irrevocable.
• The method of signature does not change the constitutional nature of the clemency power, so long as the decision was the president’s.

In practice, that means attempts to claw back already-granted pardons on an autopen theory would face extremely stiff resistance in court. Even legal scholars sympathetic to a strong executive are wary of letting a later president un-pardon people based on how the document was signed.

Politics, “Enemies,” and the Rule of Law

From a political perspective, the autopen narrative functions as another tool in a larger project: casting a predecessor as illegitimate or incapacitated and suggesting that their official acts are suspect on that basis. The language of “forgery,” “perjury,” and “null and void” is aimed less at administrative lawyers and more at a political audience already primed to see Biden as unfit.

From a rule-of-law perspective, that is precisely why the theory is dangerous. If every change of administration brought not only policy reversals but retroactive attacks on the very validity of the prior president’s signature, the stability of executive governance would be at risk. Agencies, states, businesses, and ordinary citizens would never know which actions are safe to rely on.

Healthy democratic accountability means we absolutely can argue over policies and revoke prior orders through lawful channels. But turning autograph style into a weapon against a former president’s entire record is a different move—and one that courts, if asked, may well decline to endorse.

Key Takeaways

• Autopens are legally recognized tools for presidential signatures, as long as the president makes and authorizes the underlying decision.
• Any sitting president can revoke prior executive orders as a policy matter, but cannot simply declare them historically void due to autopen use.
• Retroactively invalidating large categories of actions would create legal chaos and undercut reliance interests across government and society.
• Courts are likely to view broad “autopen invalidation” moves as politically motivated and legally weak, compared to ordinary, case-specific challenges.
• The real story is less about pens and more about power: who gets to define which presidential acts “count” when the political winds shift.

Editor’s Note

This essay is researched and sourced, with commentary and analysis, not legal advice. It reflects the public record on autopens, executive orders, and presidential practice as of late 2025, along with mainstream interpretations from constitutional scholars and legal observers, and the analysis and edits by the authors. –DrWeb & Perplexity

Sources & Further Reading (MLA 9)

• Justice Department, Office of Legal Counsel. “Whether the President May Sign a Bill by Directing That His Signature Be Affixed to It.” U.S. Department of Justice, 7 July 2005, https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/whether-president-may-sign-bill-directing-his-signature-be-affixed-it .
• Congressional Research Service. Executive Orders: An Introduction. 29 Mar. 2021, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11032 .
• Bomboy, Scott. “Defining the President’s Constitutional Powers to Issue Executive Orders.” National Constitution Center, 29 Jan. 2025, https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/defining-the-presidents-constitutional-powers-to-issue-executive-orders .
• “Executive Orders.” American Bar Association – Public Education, 2021, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/executiveorders/ .
• “Judicial Review of Executive Orders.” Federal Judicial Center, https://www.fjc.gov/history/courts/judicial-review-executive-orders .
• Whelan, M. Edward III, et al. “Whether the President May Sign a Bill by Directing That His Signature Be Affixed to It.” Office of Legal Counsel Opinions, vol. 29, 2005, pp. 97–104. justice.gov .
• “Obama ‘Autopens’ Patriot Act Extension into Law.” CBS News, 27 May 2011, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-autopens-patriot-act-extension-into-law/ .
• Turnipseed, Tony L. “The President and the Autopen.” Journal of Technology Law & Policy, vol. 17, 2012, https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/jtlp/vol17/iss1/4/ .
• Associated Press. “Presidents Have Used Autopens for Decades. Now Trump Is Attacking Biden’s Use.” AP News, 17 Mar. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/biden-autopen-trump-executive-orders-00e8e0dfca0284 .
• “What Is an Autopen and Why Can’t Trump Stop Talking About It?” The Guardian, 29 Nov. 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/29/autopen-trump-biden-executive-orders .
• “Trump Says He Is Canceling All Biden Executive Orders Signed With Autopen.” The Wall Street Journal, 28 Nov. 2025, https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-biden-autopen-executive-orders .
• “Trump Threatens Biden with ‘Charges of Perjury.’” New York Post, 28 Nov. 2025, https://nypost.com/2025/11/28/news/trump-threatens-biden-over-autopen/ .
• “Legal Analysts React to Trump’s Plan to Terminate Biden Executive Orders.” Newsweek, 28 Nov. 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/trump-biden-autopen-legal-experts-react-1861234 .
• U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Accountability. The Biden Autopen Presidency: Decline, Delusion, and Deception in the White House. 24 Oct. 2025, https://oversight.house.gov/release/the-biden-autopen-presidency-report .
• “Reviewing Certain Presidential Actions.” The White House, 4 June 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2025/06/04/reviewing-certain-presidential-actions/ .

#2005OlcOpinion #2025 #autopens #bibliography #cancellingBidensAutopenOrders #cbsNews #courtsPredictions #doj #donaldTrump #dwdSpecialReport #executiveOrders #history #howSigned #legal #mla #modernPractice #opinion #pardons #perplexity #perplexityPlus #politicalEnemies #politics #resistance #revocation #ruleOfLaw #trump #trumpAdministration #unitedStates

UCMJ Article 92 & The Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders – 2025

Editor’s Note: This text (edited) was created by Gemini, November 20, 2025. The image is provided as CC0 1.0 public domain for use by anyone as needed. UCMJ Article 92 by Michael McCulley is marked CC0 1.0 Universal

The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) does not explicitly have a section titled “constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders,” but its provisions clearly establish that military personnel are required to obey only lawful orders. Illegal orders—those that violate the Constitution, U.S. laws, or international laws—do not require compliance and must be disobeyed.

Relevant UCMJ Articles and Provisions
Article 92 (10 U.S.C. § 892) – Failure to Obey an Order or Regulation

This article makes it a punishable offense to disobey lawful orders or regulations. It applies only to lawful orders, implying that unlawful orders are not to be obeyed. Orders are presumed lawful unless they clearly violate laws or constitutional rights.

This article also emphasizes the obedience of lawful orders, with punishment for willful disobedience. It implicitly excludes unlawful orders from what must be obeyed.

Legal experts interpret this as underscoring that orders lacking valid military purpose or that violate the Constitution are illegal and must not be followed.

Legal and Constitutional Duty to Disobey Illegal Orders

Military personnel swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, placing constitutional duty above obedience to unlawful commands. They are legally and morally obligated to refuse orders that require criminal acts, torture, harming civilians, or violate treaties such as the Geneva Conventions.

The law and military legal commentary affirm that obeying illegal orders is not a defense for committing illegal acts (the “Nuremberg defense” is invalid). Service members have a responsibility to seek clarification, document, report, and refuse unlawful commands.

Illegal orders include any commands that contradict the Constitution, U.S. laws, lawful superior orders, or fall beyond the issuing official’s authority. The legality of an order can ultimately be decided by a military judge.

Summary

The UCMJ Article 92 governs obedience, but its text and interpretation make clear only lawful orders must be obeyed.

The constitutional duty to disobey illegal orders arises from the oath to defend the Constitution and the principle that illegal orders are void.

Military law supports refusal of orders that require crimes or violations of constitutional and international law, with protections for service members who do so lawfully.

This relationship is grounded in UCMJ Articles 90 and 92, intertwined with constitutional principles and military legal interpretations, providing a clear framework that service members must disobey illegal orders.

MLA Bibliography

• United States Code, Title 10, Section 892, Article 92. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title10-section892&num=0&edition=prelim. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Daniel Conway and Associates. “Article 92 Failure to Obey an Order.” Military Defense Law Offices. https://www.mcmilitarylaw.com/articles-of-ucmj/article-92-failure-to-obey-an-order/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Cornell Law School. “10 U.S. Code § 892 – Art. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation.” Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/892. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• ABC News. “What the military oath of enlistment says about legal and illegal orders.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/military-oath-enlistment-legal-illegal-orders/story?id=127725085. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• PBS NewsHour. “Trump says Democrats’ video message to military is ‘seditious behavior’ punishable by death.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-democrats-video-message-to-military-is-seditious-behavior-punishable-by-death. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Law Offices of David P. Sheldon. “Unlawful Military Orders.” https://www.militarydefense.com/tag/unlawful-military-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Reddit. “Refusing an Unlawful Military Order: Your Legal Rights.” r/navy, https://www.reddit.com/r/navy/comments/1l8zbwp/refusing_an_unlawful_military_order_your_legal/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Military Times. “4 in 5 US troops surveyed understand duty to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.militarytimes.com/opinion/commentary/2025/08/14/4-in-5-us-troops-surveyed-understand-duty-to-disobey-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Newsweek. “What US law says about sedition and troops defying illegal orders.” https://www.newsweek.com/what-us-law-says-sedition-troops-defying-illegal-orders-11084527. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• CNN Politics. “Democratic lawmakers urge troops to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/19/politics/democratic-lawmakers-urge-troops-to-disobey-illegal-orders. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Al Jazeera. “‘Punishable by DEATH’: Trump threatens Democrats with sedition charges.” https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/20/punishable-by-death-trump-threatens-democrats-with-sedition-charges. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Reddit. “Uncomfortable with the members of Congress who messaged to not…” r/AirForce, https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1p1b7d4/uncomfortable_with_the_members_of_congress_who/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Facebook Group Post. “Military members obligation to disobey illegal orders.” https://www.facebook.com/groups/servicewhenwomencomemarchinghome/posts/24580730314894966/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Military Law Task Force. “FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders.” https://nlgmltf.org/military-law/2025/faq-on-refusing-illegal-orders/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• U.S. Army Courts of Criminal Appeals. “Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 91.” https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA15.htm. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• Facebook Post. “President Trump called for lawmakers from the video to be arrested…” https://www.facebook.com/armytimes/posts/1245362770958632/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2025.
• United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025.
• United States. Uniform Code of Military Justice. Title 10, U.S. Code, §§ 890–933 (2025), Articles 90 and 92. United States Government Publishing Office, 2025. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/subtitle-A/part-II/chapter-47. Accessed 20 Nov. 2025.

#2025 #bibliography #constitutionalDuty #dutyToDisobeyIllegalOrders #gemini #geminiAi #googleGemini #internationalLaws #legalExperts #militaryJudges #mla #uSConstitution #uSLaws #ucmj #ucmjArticle90 #ucmjArticle92 #uniformCodeOfMilitaryJustice

JabRef meets GIt - for easier collaboration!

Thanks to our #GSOC contributor, Wanling, JabRef now supports experimental integration with #git and #GitHub to simplify collaboration.
The cool thing is that you don't need to know anything about Git or its details.
The heart of the new feature is the fantastic semantic conflict resolution, which works on an entry/field basis.

https://blog.jabref.org/2025/11/11/introducing-git-integration-in-jabref.md/

#jabref #academia #javafx #opensource #bibliography #bibtex #teXLaTeX

👻 🎃 JabRef 6.0-alpha.3 Release 🎃 👻

Trick or treat! Happy Halloween from the JabRef team! We are happy to announce the release of JabRef 6.0 Alpha 3

Release Highlights:

- Arm64 Linux support,
- Improved UI for Citations
- New Fetchers: #OpenAlex and #EuropePMC
- Initial Cite As You Write endpoint
- First CLI version #JabKit with integrity check
- #CSL style fixes for #LibreOffice
- #JavaFX 25

#java #opensource #linux #arm #bibliography #academia #citations #texlatex #JabRef #GSOC #gsoc2025

👻 🎃 JabRef 6.0-alpha.3 Release 🎃 👻

Trick or treat! Happy Halloween from the JabRef team! We are happy to announce the release of JabRef 6.0 Alpha 3

Release Highlights:

- Arm64 Linux support,
- Improved UI for Citations
- New Fetchers: #OpenAlex and #EuropePMC
- Initial Cite As You Write endpoint
- First CLI version #JabKit with integrity check
- #CSL style fixes for #LibreOffice
- #JavaFX 25

#java #opensource #linux #arm #bibliography #academia #citations #texlatex #JabRef #GSOC #gsoc2025

👻 🎃 JabRef 6.0-alpha.3 Release 🎃 👻

Trick or treat! Happy Halloween from the JabRef team! We are happy to announce the release of JabRef 6.0 Alpha 3

Release Highlights:

- Arm64 Linux support,
- Improved UI for Citations
- New Fetchers: #OpenAlex and #EuropePMC
- Initial Cite As You Write endpoint
- First CLI version #JabKit with integrity check
- #CSL style fixes for #LibreOffice
- #JavaFX 25

#java #opensource #linux #arm #bibliography #academia #citations #texlatex #JabRef #GSOC #gsoc2025

👻 🎃 JabRef 6.0-alpha.3 Release 🎃 👻

Trick or treat! Happy Halloween from the JabRef team! We are happy to announce the release of JabRef 6.0 Alpha 3

Release Highlights:

- Arm64 Linux support,
- Improved UI for Citations
- New Fetchers: #OpenAlex and #EuropePMC
- Initial Cite As You Write endpoint
- First CLI version #JabKit with integrity check
- #CSL style fixes for #LibreOffice
- #JavaFX 25

#java #opensource #linux #arm #bibliography #academia #citations #texlatex #JabRef #GSOC #gsoc2025

👻 🎃 JabRef 6.0-alpha.3 Release 🎃 👻

Trick or treat! Happy Halloween from the JabRef team! We are happy to announce the release of JabRef 6.0 Alpha 3

Release Highlights:

- Arm64 Linux support,
- Improved UI for Citations
- New Fetchers: #OpenAlex and #EuropePMC
- Initial Cite As You Write endpoint
- First CLI version #JabKit with integrity check
- #CSL style fixes for #LibreOffice
- #JavaFX 25

#java #opensource #linux #arm #bibliography #academia #citations #texlatex #JabRef #GSOC #gsoc2025

Multics
https://www.multicians.org/multics.html
#ycombinator #operating_system #timesharing #time_sharing #stories #technical_papers #humor #pictures #people #history #bibliography #glossary #MIT #Project_MAC #Honeywell #Bell_Laboratories #computer #software #mainframe #PL_I #program_source

Multics
https://www.multicians.org/multics.html
#ycombinator #operating_system #timesharing #time_sharing #stories #technical_papers #humor #pictures #people #history #bibliography #glossary #MIT #Project_MAC #Honeywell #Bell_Laboratories #computer #software #mainframe #PL_I #program_source

Multics
https://www.multicians.org/multics.html
#ycombinator #operating_system #timesharing #time_sharing #stories #technical_papers #humor #pictures #people #history #bibliography #glossary #MIT #Project_MAC #Honeywell #Bell_Laboratories #computer #software #mainframe #PL_I #program_source

Multics
https://www.multicians.org/multics.html
#ycombinator #operating_system #timesharing #time_sharing #stories #technical_papers #humor #pictures #people #history #bibliography #glossary #MIT #Project_MAC #Honeywell #Bell_Laboratories #computer #software #mainframe #PL_I #program_source

Show HN: Turn a paper's DOI into its full reference list (BibTeX/RIS, etc.)
https://references.mireklzicar.com
#ycombinator #DOI #citations #academic_references #BibTeX #RIS #citation_styles #APA #IEEE #Nature #research #bibliography #academic_papers

A couple of days ago we released the new Alpha 2 of Version 6.0 with many bug fixes and some fancy new things.

We improved the onboarding experience for new users, improved #CSL support in LibreOffice and for the #TexLaTeX users we now have support for analyzing blg files in the integrity check.

More info in our blog post: https://blog.jabref.org/2025/05/06/JabRef6-0-alpha2/

#javafx #academia #opensource #ai #bibtex #bibliography

I'm rewarding myself for sending off three things with some indulgent research. Also, because it's the hot thing to do, this is your reminder that next week's AWWE conference can also be attended virtually from afar -- which will give you all the chance to hear me talk some more about Thomas Richards, Dolgellau.

https://bydbach.hcommons.org/thomas-richards-1800-1877-a-bibliography-in-progress-reloaded/

#Wales #Literature #WelshWritingInEnglish #Bibliography #Romantics #Tasmania

HBD Darius Wells born 26 April 1800 Kingsboro, NY. He invented the router—a lateral revolving cutting tool—to make the first machine cut wood types. 1st specimen catalog in 1828 co. became D. Wells & Co in 1835 & Wells & Webb in 1839.

He was an active abolitionist, and ran a “station” on the underground railroad in Patterson, NJ helping enslaved humans make their way north to Canada to live as free humans.

#WoodType #router #letterforms #typography #design #bibliography #archives #libraries

HBD Henry P Hamilton born 21 Apr 1862 youngest of 3 brothers, worked with older brthr George at _The Detroit Record_ as a printer & then with oldest brthr James at Hamilton & Baker, later Hamilton Mfg Co Credited patents USD37308 & 37309
http://www.woodtyperesearch.com/hamilton-mfg-672-673

#WoodType #letterforms #typography #archives #libraries #collections #bibliography #TypeSpecimen #TypeDesign #TypeHistory #letterpress #type #design #history #NineteethCentury #19thCentury #patents #uspatents

[Zotero] 📢 nouveau billet du blog #Zotero Francophone : "Bonnes pratiques pour la création d’un style CSL" https://zotero.hypotheses.org/5302
Des bonnes pratiques à mettre en œuvre si l'on ne trouve chaussure à son pied parmi les +10000 styles #CSL 😉
#bibliography #CSLstyles #coding #referencemanager

[Zotero] 📢 nouveau billet du blog #Zotero Francophone : "Bonnes pratiques pour la création d’un style CSL" https://zotero.hypotheses.org/5302
Des bonnes pratiques à mettre en œuvre si l'on ne trouve chaussure à son pied parmi les +10000 styles #CSL 😉
#bibliography #CSLstyles #coding #referencemanager

[Zotero] 📢 nouveau billet du blog #Zotero Francophone : "Bonnes pratiques pour la création d’un style CSL" https://zotero.hypotheses.org/5302
Des bonnes pratiques à mettre en œuvre si l'on ne trouve chaussure à son pied parmi les +10000 styles #CSL 😉
#bibliography #CSLstyles #coding #referencemanager

[Zotero] 📢 nouveau billet du blog #Zotero Francophone : "Bonnes pratiques pour la création d’un style CSL" https://zotero.hypotheses.org/5302
Des bonnes pratiques à mettre en œuvre si l'on ne trouve chaussure à son pied parmi les +10000 styles #CSL 😉
#bibliography #CSLstyles #coding #referencemanager

Cita bibliográfica, siiii encontré esta imagen para describir una "cita bibliográfica" #citation 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Por cierto, puede ser un buen plan para el 14 de febrero #ValentinesDay #bookstodon #Books #referencing #Bibliografía #Citación #Zotero #Referenced #bibliography

👓Hasta pueden leer juntos un buen #Paper 🧫🔬🧬🧪⚗️

⬇️❤️📚📝

Cita bibliográfica, siiii encontré esta imagen para describir una "cita bibliográfica" #citation 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Por cierto, puede ser un buen plan para el 14 de febrero #ValentinesDay #bookstodon #Books #referencing #Bibliografía #Citación #Zotero #Referenced #bibliography

👓Hasta pueden leer juntos un buen #Paper 🧫🔬🧬🧪⚗️

⬇️❤️📚📝

Cita bibliográfica, siiii encontré esta imagen para describir una "cita bibliográfica" #citation 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Por cierto, puede ser un buen plan para el 14 de febrero #ValentinesDay #bookstodon #Books #referencing #Bibliografía #Citación #Zotero #Referenced #bibliography

👓Hasta pueden leer juntos un buen #Paper 🧫🔬🧬🧪⚗️

⬇️❤️📚📝

Cita bibliográfica, siiii encontré esta imagen para describir una "cita bibliográfica" #citation 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Por cierto, puede ser un buen plan para el 14 de febrero #ValentinesDay #bookstodon #Books #referencing #Bibliografía #Citación #Zotero #Referenced #bibliography

👓Hasta pueden leer juntos un buen #Paper 🧫🔬🧬🧪⚗️

⬇️❤️📚📝