#r7rs — Public Fediverse posts

I am borrowing the term, “The Prime Directive,” from the popular science fiction series Star Trek to describe my AI policy:

Every single line of code, every S-expression, every comment, every piece of documentation, every part of this software that serves a function must have that function be well-understood by at least one person (and of course, AI is not a person).

The term “well understood” is deliberately vague so that we (the Schemacs developer community) can decide on a case-by-case basis whether a person understands a function well enough.

Vibe coding is banned.

The definition of “Vibe Coding” is that you don’t bother to understand what the computer code means, if the software appears to behave in the way you expect you declare the code “correct.” By definition, vibe coding violates the Software Engineer’s Prime Directive.

Some LLM-generated output is OK.

If you suffer from some form of disability, and use an AI coding assistant to write code faster, this is perfectly acceptable so long you adhere to the Prime Directive — you must be able to defend the code you write by explaining the function of all of it’s component parts.

The term “disability” is deliberately vague because I don’t believe we as a community should define tests to decide whether someone qualifies as “having a disability.” If your disability is that you don’t like writing text, that is fine. Just obey the Prime Directive.

Unofficial AI Policy: we don’t need it.

This is a project for people to have fun. If you don’t like writing computer code, then don’t contribute computer code. There are plenty of other ways to contribute without needing AI coding.

There is no hurry, there is no deadline. Write code because you enjoy it, or because you want to learn how computers work. It is OK to take your time and enjoy yourself. There is really no reason to use AI for this project.

#tech #software #AI #LLMs #LLM #Scheme #R7RS #SchemeLang #Lisp #Schemacs #Emacs #EmacsLisp #Slop #VibeCoding #ClaudeCode #ChatGPT #SlopMachine

I am borrowing the term, “The Prime Directive,” from the popular science fiction series Star Trek to describe my AI policy:

Every single line of code, every S-expression, every comment, every piece of documentation, every part of this software that serves a function must have that function be well-understood by at least one person (and of course, AI is not a person).

The term “well understood” is deliberately vague so that we (the Schemacs developer community) can decide on a case-by-case basis whether a person understands a function well enough.

Vibe coding is banned.

The definition of “Vibe Coding” is that you don’t bother to understand what the computer code means, if the software appears to behave in the way you expect you declare the code “correct.” By definition, vibe coding violates the Software Engineer’s Prime Directive.

Some LLM-generated output is OK.

If you suffer from some form of disability, and use an AI coding assistant to write code faster, this is perfectly acceptable so long you adhere to the Prime Directive — you must be able to defend the code you write by explaining the function of all of it’s component parts.

The term “disability” is deliberately vague because I don’t believe we as a community should define tests to decide whether someone qualifies as “having a disability.” If your disability is that you don’t like writing text, that is fine. Just obey the Prime Directive.

Unofficial AI Policy: we don’t need it.

This is a project for people to have fun. If you don’t like writing computer code, then don’t contribute computer code. There are plenty of other ways to contribute without needing AI coding.

There is no hurry, there is no deadline. Write code because you enjoy it, or because you want to learn how computers work. It is OK to take your time and enjoy yourself. There is really no reason to use AI for this project.

#tech #software #AI #LLMs #LLM #Scheme #R7RS #SchemeLang #Lisp #Schemacs #Emacs #EmacsLisp #Slop #VibeCoding #ClaudeCode #ChatGPT #SlopMachine

I am borrowing the term, “The Prime Directive,” from the popular science fiction series Star Trek to describe my AI policy:

Every single line of code, every S-expression, every comment, every piece of documentation, every part of this software that serves a function must have that function be well-understood by at least one person (and of course, AI is not a person).

The term “well understood” is deliberately vague so that we (the Schemacs developer community) can decide on a case-by-case basis whether a person understands a function well enough.

Vibe coding is banned.

The definition of “Vibe Coding” is that you don’t bother to understand what the computer code means, if the software appears to behave in the way you expect you declare the code “correct.” By definition, vibe coding violates the Software Engineer’s Prime Directive.

Some LLM-generated output is OK.

If you suffer from some form of disability, and use an AI coding assistant to write code faster, this is perfectly acceptable so long you adhere to the Prime Directive — you must be able to defend the code you write by explaining the function of all of it’s component parts.

The term “disability” is deliberately vague because I don’t believe we as a community should define tests to decide whether someone qualifies as “having a disability.” If your disability is that you don’t like writing text, that is fine. Just obey the Prime Directive.

Unofficial AI Policy: we don’t need it.

This is a project for people to have fun. If you don’t like writing computer code, then don’t contribute computer code. There are plenty of other ways to contribute without needing AI coding.

There is no hurry, there is no deadline. Write code because you enjoy it, or because you want to learn how computers work. It is OK to take your time and enjoy yourself. There is really no reason to use AI for this project.

#tech #software #AI #LLMs #LLM #Scheme #R7RS #SchemeLang #Lisp #Schemacs #Emacs #EmacsLisp #Slop #VibeCoding #ClaudeCode #ChatGPT #SlopMachine

I am borrowing the term, “The Prime Directive,” from the popular science fiction series Star Trek to describe my AI policy:

Every single line of code, every S-expression, every comment, every piece of documentation, every part of this software that serves a function must have that function be well-understood by at least one person (and of course, AI is not a person).

The term “well understood” is deliberately vague so that we (the Schemacs developer community) can decide on a case-by-case basis whether a person understands a function well enough.

Vibe coding is banned.

The definition of “Vibe Coding” is that you don’t bother to understand what the computer code means, if the software appears to behave in the way you expect you declare the code “correct.” By definition, vibe coding violates the Software Engineer’s Prime Directive.

Some LLM-generated output is OK.

If you suffer from some form of disability, and use an AI coding assistant to write code faster, this is perfectly acceptable so long you adhere to the Prime Directive — you must be able to defend the code you write by explaining the function of all of it’s component parts.

The term “disability” is deliberately vague because I don’t believe we as a community should define tests to decide whether someone qualifies as “having a disability.” If your disability is that you don’t like writing text, that is fine. Just obey the Prime Directive.

Unofficial AI Policy: we don’t need it.

This is a project for people to have fun. If you don’t like writing computer code, then don’t contribute computer code. There are plenty of other ways to contribute without needing AI coding.

There is no hurry, there is no deadline. Write code because you enjoy it, or because you want to learn how computers work. It is OK to take your time and enjoy yourself. There is really no reason to use AI for this project.

#tech #software #AI #LLMs #LLM #Scheme #R7RS #SchemeLang #Lisp #Schemacs #Emacs #EmacsLisp #Slop #VibeCoding #ClaudeCode #ChatGPT #SlopMachine

ughh i just spent like an hour or more trying to actually run my little scheme thing in the browser

Hoot doesn't work outright, Gambit generates very big JS that also hangs on awaiting the result (why must i await it at all), idk maybe i just don't understand something, or it's so underdocumented and i must call some special function

i'd be very welcome for your advice on calling Scheme(R7RS library) functions from JS

#scheme #r7rs

ughh i just spent like an hour or more trying to actually run my little scheme thing in the browser

Hoot doesn't work outright, Gambit generates very big JS that also hangs on awaiting the result (why must i await it at all), idk maybe i just don't understand something, or it's so underdocumented and i must call some special function

i'd be very welcome for your advice on calling Scheme(R7RS library) functions from JS

#scheme #r7rs

ughh i just spent like an hour or more trying to actually run my little scheme thing in the browser

Hoot doesn't work outright, Gambit generates very big JS that also hangs on awaiting the result (why must i await it at all), idk maybe i just don't understand something, or it's so underdocumented and i must call some special function

i'd be very welcome for your advice on calling Scheme(R7RS library) functions from JS

#scheme #r7rs

ughh i just spent like an hour or more trying to actually run my little scheme thing in the browser

Hoot doesn't work outright, Gambit generates very big JS that also hangs on awaiting the result (why must i await it at all), idk maybe i just don't understand something, or it's so underdocumented and i must call some special function

i'd be very welcome for your advice on calling Scheme(R7RS library) functions from JS

#scheme #r7rs

ughh i just spent like an hour or more trying to actually run my little scheme thing in the browser

Hoot doesn't work outright, Gambit generates very big JS that also hangs on awaiting the result (why must i await it at all), idk maybe i just don't understand something, or it's so underdocumented and i must call some special function

i'd be very welcome for your advice on calling Scheme(R7RS library) functions from JS

#scheme #r7rs

There once was this nice page presenting debian packages:
https://debaday.debian.net/about-this-site/index.html

Maybe we could do something similar in the fediverse? Let's try:

Today I want to present the programming language Scheme using a (less well known? but) very nice implementation: Gauche. For me Scheme was only love at second sight. On first contact I thought it is a toy. But it is not.

Quick start using Gauche in R⁷RS mode:

$ sudo apt install gauche gauche-doc
$ gosh -r7
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (+ 2 2)
4
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (import (scheme list))
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (let ((x 10000000)) (= (apply + (iota x 1)) (/ (* (+ 1 x) x) 2)))
#t

Some links:
- Gauche https://practical-scheme.net/gauche/
- Revised⁷ Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme https://r7rs.org/

#debian #debaday #programming #scheme #r7rs #gauche

There once was this nice page presenting debian packages:
https://debaday.debian.net/about-this-site/index.html

Maybe we could do something similar in the fediverse? Let's try:

Today I want to present the programming language Scheme using a (less well known? but) very nice implementation: Gauche. For me Scheme was only love at second sight. On first contact I thought it is a toy. But it is not.

Quick start using Gauche in R⁷RS mode:

$ sudo apt install gauche gauche-doc
$ gosh -r7
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (+ 2 2)
4
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (import (scheme list))
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (let ((x 10000000)) (= (apply + (iota x 1)) (/ (* (+ 1 x) x) 2)))
#t

Some links:
- Gauche https://practical-scheme.net/gauche/
- Revised⁷ Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme https://r7rs.org/

#debian #debaday #programming #scheme #r7rs #gauche

There once was this nice page presenting debian packages:
https://debaday.debian.net/about-this-site/index.html

Maybe we could do something similar in the fediverse? Let's try:

Today I want to present the programming language Scheme using a (less well known? but) very nice implementation: Gauche. For me Scheme was only love at second sight. On first contact I thought it is a toy. But it is not.

Quick start using Gauche in R⁷RS mode:

$ sudo apt install gauche gauche-doc
$ gosh -r7
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (+ 2 2)
4
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (import (scheme list))
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (let ((x 10000000)) (= (apply + (iota x 1)) (/ (* (+ 1 x) x) 2)))
#t

Some links:
- Gauche https://practical-scheme.net/gauche/
- Revised⁷ Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme https://r7rs.org/

#debian #debaday #programming #scheme #r7rs #gauche

There once was this nice page presenting debian packages:
https://debaday.debian.net/about-this-site/index.html

Maybe we could do something similar in the fediverse? Let's try:

Today I want to present the programming language Scheme using a (less well known? but) very nice implementation: Gauche. For me Scheme was only love at second sight. On first contact I thought it is a toy. But it is not.

Quick start using Gauche in R⁷RS mode:

$ sudo apt install gauche gauche-doc
$ gosh -r7
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (+ 2 2)
4
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (import (scheme list))
gosh[r7rs.user]$ (let ((x 10000000)) (= (apply + (iota x 1)) (/ (* (+ 1 x) x) 2)))
#t

Some links:
- Gauche https://practical-scheme.net/gauche/
- Revised⁷ Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme https://r7rs.org/

#debian #debaday #programming #scheme #r7rs #gauche

Just use a #ProgrammingLanguage that isn’t popular (e.g. #Haskell or some #Lisp dialect) to write your code, but publish human-readable intermediate form of that code in the public code repositories (e.g. the C programming language). Share the actual source code privately with trusted contributors in non-public branches, and require GPG signatures on actual contributions.

You could argue that not sharing source code is against the GPL, but the GPL does allow you to share the code as a hard copy printed on paper and sent over snail mail. Or you can just wait until the person asking is an actual human that you can trust not to use the source code for LLM training.

LLMs are unable to learn unpopular programming languages because they don’t have a sufficient corpus of training data to learn how to code it, so if your receive a contribution in C, thank the contributor but inform them that they will have to rewrite the contribution in your Lisp dialect before you can accept it.

#Scheme dialects like #Gambit , #Chicken , and #Bigloo would work well for this. So would a #CommonLisp implementation that translates to C such as #ECL . Although keep in mind that the idea is to use a less popular language, so you may have to further obscure these languages a little bit, but not in a way that would be difficult for humans. For example, using a macro system, you could use df instead of define, rename types of things like string? to utf8str?, use generic functions with mulitple dispatch so append will work on strings, lists, vectors, and bytevectors. Small tweaks like this might throw-off an LLM asked to write source code in Lisp.

#tech #software #LLMs #LLM #FOSS #FLOSS #OpenSource #SchemeLang #R7RS

Just use a #ProgrammingLanguage that isn’t popular (e.g. #Haskell or some #Lisp dialect) to write your code, but publish human-readable intermediate form of that code in the public code repositories (e.g. the C programming language). Share the actual source code privately with trusted contributors in non-public branches, and require GPG signatures on actual contributions.

You could argue that not sharing source code is against the GPL, but the GPL does allow you to share the code as a hard copy printed on paper and sent over snail mail. Or you can just wait until the person asking is an actual human that you can trust not to use the source code for LLM training.

LLMs are unable to learn unpopular programming languages because they don’t have a sufficient corpus of training data to learn how to code it, so if your receive a contribution in C, thank the contributor but inform them that they will have to rewrite the contribution in your Lisp dialect before you can accept it.

#Scheme dialects like #Gambit , #Chicken , and #Bigloo would work well for this. So would a #CommonLisp implementation that translates to C such as #ECL . Although keep in mind that the idea is to use a less popular language, so you may have to further obscure these languages a little bit, but not in a way that would be difficult for humans. For example, using a macro system, you could use df instead of define, rename types of things like string? to utf8str?, use generic functions with mulitple dispatch so append will work on strings, lists, vectors, and bytevectors. Small tweaks like this might throw-off an LLM asked to write source code in Lisp.

#tech #software #LLMs #LLM #FOSS #FLOSS #OpenSource #SchemeLang #R7RS

Just use a #ProgrammingLanguage that isn’t popular (e.g. #Haskell or some #Lisp dialect) to write your code, but publish human-readable intermediate form of that code in the public code repositories (e.g. the C programming language). Share the actual source code privately with trusted contributors in non-public branches, and require GPG signatures on actual contributions.

You could argue that not sharing source code is against the GPL, but the GPL does allow you to share the code as a hard copy printed on paper and sent over snail mail. Or you can just wait until the person asking is an actual human that you can trust not to use the source code for LLM training.

LLMs are unable to learn unpopular programming languages because they don’t have a sufficient corpus of training data to learn how to code it, so if your receive a contribution in C, thank the contributor but inform them that they will have to rewrite the contribution in your Lisp dialect before you can accept it.

#Scheme dialects like #Gambit , #Chicken , and #Bigloo would work well for this. So would a #CommonLisp implementation that translates to C such as #ECL . Although keep in mind that the idea is to use a less popular language, so you may have to further obscure these languages a little bit, but not in a way that would be difficult for humans. For example, using a macro system, you could use df instead of define, rename types of things like string? to utf8str?, use generic functions with mulitple dispatch so append will work on strings, lists, vectors, and bytevectors. Small tweaks like this might throw-off an LLM asked to write source code in Lisp.

#tech #software #LLMs #LLM #FOSS #FLOSS #OpenSource #SchemeLang #R7RS

Just use a #ProgrammingLanguage that isn’t popular (e.g. #Haskell or some #Lisp dialect) to write your code, but publish human-readable intermediate form of that code in the public code repositories (e.g. the C programming language). Share the actual source code privately with trusted contributors in non-public branches, and require GPG signatures on actual contributions.

You could argue that not sharing source code is against the GPL, but the GPL does allow you to share the code as a hard copy printed on paper and sent over snail mail. Or you can just wait until the person asking is an actual human that you can trust not to use the source code for LLM training.

LLMs are unable to learn unpopular programming languages because they don’t have a sufficient corpus of training data to learn how to code it, so if your receive a contribution in C, thank the contributor but inform them that they will have to rewrite the contribution in your Lisp dialect before you can accept it.

#Scheme dialects like #Gambit , #Chicken , and #Bigloo would work well for this. So would a #CommonLisp implementation that translates to C such as #ECL . Although keep in mind that the idea is to use a less popular language, so you may have to further obscure these languages a little bit, but not in a way that would be difficult for humans. For example, using a macro system, you could use df instead of define, rename types of things like string? to utf8str?, use generic functions with mulitple dispatch so append will work on strings, lists, vectors, and bytevectors. Small tweaks like this might throw-off an LLM asked to write source code in Lisp.

#tech #software #LLMs #LLM #FOSS #FLOSS #OpenSource #SchemeLang #R7RS

Looks like a fascinating read! They have provided chapter 8 as a PDF file downloadable gratis as a sneak-peek into the rest of the book, guess what it’s about:

Chapter 8: Sussman and Steel make Scheme

Awesome! I can’t wait to read that chapter, and then the rest of the book!

Details on the book homepage: https://berksoft.ca/gol/

#tech #software #Lisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS

RE: https://mstdn.ca/@cdegroot/116086771614712320

Looks like a fascinating read! They have provided chapter 8 as a PDF file downloadable gratis as a sneak-peek into the rest of the book, guess what it’s about:

Chapter 8: Sussman and Steel make Scheme

Awesome! I can’t wait to read that chapter, and then the rest of the book!

Details on the book homepage: https://berksoft.ca/gol/

#tech #software #Lisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS

RE: https://mstdn.ca/@cdegroot/116086771614712320

Looks like a fascinating read! They have provided chapter 8 as a PDF file downloadable gratis as a sneak-peek into the rest of the book, guess what it’s about:

Chapter 8: Sussman and Steel make Scheme

Awesome! I can’t wait to read that chapter, and then the rest of the book!

Details on the book homepage: https://berksoft.ca/gol/

#tech #software #Lisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS

RE: https://mstdn.ca/@cdegroot/116086771614712320

Looks like a fascinating read! They have provided chapter 8 as a PDF file downloadable gratis as a sneak-peek into the rest of the book, guess what it’s about:

Chapter 8: Sussman and Steel make Scheme

Awesome! I can’t wait to read that chapter, and then the rest of the book!

Details on the book homepage: https://berksoft.ca/gol/

#tech #software #Lisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS

RE: https://mstdn.ca/@cdegroot/116086771614712320

I decided to merge my #Scheme react-like declarative GUI framework (schemacs ui), even though the back-end isn’t completely bug-free yet. (It is still an experimental software project, so the main branch is the development branch).

Though it is written in pure #R7RS “small” Scheme, the only GUI back-end currently available is for Guile users who go to the trouble to install Guile-GI all on their own.

If Guile-GI is installed, put on your safety goggles and run this command in the Guile REPL:

(load "./main-gui.scm")

I haven’t tried getting it to work in a Guix shell for almost a year now, but my last attempt did not go well (it crashed while initializing Gtk). To anyone who wants to try the GUI, I am sorry to inconvenience you, but I’m afraid I just have to ask you to please install Guile-GI yourself using the old-fashioned ./configure && make && make install method. If anyone happens to be able to get it to work in a Guix shell, please let me know, or open a PR on the Codeberg Git repository.

The only examples for how to use (schemacs ui) are in the test suite and the Schemacs Debugger. The only documentation so far are the comments in the source code, though I did try to be very thorough with comments.

The “Debugui” debugger works, but only has one single feature: the eval-expression command, which is bound to M-: (Alt-Colon). This command works the same as in #Emacs but you enter a Scheme language command instead. The #EmacsLisp interpreter is not yet connected to the GUI.

Now that this is merged, I am going to work on a few tasks in the Emacs Lisp interpreter that have been pending for more than a few weeks now. Then, back to creating new features in the GUI toward the goal of making it a useful program editor. And also, of course, writing some more documentation.

#tech #software #R7RS #SchemeLang

I decided to merge my #Scheme react-like declarative GUI framework (schemacs ui), even though the back-end isn’t completely bug-free yet. (It is still an experimental software project, so the main branch is the development branch).

Though it is written in pure #R7RS “small” Scheme, the only GUI back-end currently available is for Guile users who go to the trouble to install Guile-GI all on their own.

If Guile-GI is installed, put on your safety goggles and run this command in the Guile REPL:

(load "./main-gui.scm")

I haven’t tried getting it to work in a Guix shell for almost a year now, but my last attempt did not go well (it crashed while initializing Gtk). To anyone who wants to try the GUI, I am sorry to inconvenience you, but I’m afraid I just have to ask you to please install Guile-GI yourself using the old-fashioned ./configure && make && make install method. If anyone happens to be able to get it to work in a Guix shell, please let me know, or open a PR on the Codeberg Git repository.

The only examples for how to use (schemacs ui) are in the test suite and the Schemacs Debugger. The only documentation so far are the comments in the source code, though I did try to be very thorough with comments.

The “Debugui” debugger works, but only has one single feature: the eval-expression command, which is bound to M-: (Alt-Colon). This command works the same as in #Emacs but you enter a Scheme language command instead. The #EmacsLisp interpreter is not yet connected to the GUI.

Now that this is merged, I am going to work on a few tasks in the Emacs Lisp interpreter that have been pending for more than a few weeks now. Then, back to creating new features in the GUI toward the goal of making it a useful program editor. And also, of course, writing some more documentation.

#tech #software #R7RS #SchemeLang

I decided to merge my #Scheme react-like declarative GUI framework (schemacs ui), even though the back-end isn’t completely bug-free yet. (It is still an experimental software project, so the main branch is the development branch).

Though it is written in pure #R7RS “small” Scheme, the only GUI back-end currently available is for Guile users who go to the trouble to install Guile-GI all on their own.

If Guile-GI is installed, put on your safety goggles and run this command in the Guile REPL:

(load "./main-gui.scm")

I haven’t tried getting it to work in a Guix shell for almost a year now, but my last attempt did not go well (it crashed while initializing Gtk). To anyone who wants to try the GUI, I am sorry to inconvenience you, but I’m afraid I just have to ask you to please install Guile-GI yourself using the old-fashioned ./configure && make && make install method. If anyone happens to be able to get it to work in a Guix shell, please let me know, or open a PR on the Codeberg Git repository.

The only examples for how to use (schemacs ui) are in the test suite and the Schemacs Debugger. The only documentation so far are the comments in the source code, though I did try to be very thorough with comments.

The “Debugui” debugger works, but only has one single feature: the eval-expression command, which is bound to M-: (Alt-Colon). This command works the same as in #Emacs but you enter a Scheme language command instead. The #EmacsLisp interpreter is not yet connected to the GUI.

Now that this is merged, I am going to work on a few tasks in the Emacs Lisp interpreter that have been pending for more than a few weeks now. Then, back to creating new features in the GUI toward the goal of making it a useful program editor. And also, of course, writing some more documentation.

#tech #software #R7RS #SchemeLang

I decided to merge my #Scheme react-like declarative GUI framework (schemacs ui), even though the back-end isn’t completely bug-free yet. (It is still an experimental software project, so the main branch is the development branch).

Though it is written in pure #R7RS “small” Scheme, the only GUI back-end currently available is for Guile users who go to the trouble to install Guile-GI all on their own.

If Guile-GI is installed, put on your safety goggles and run this command in the Guile REPL:

(load "./main-gui.scm")

I haven’t tried getting it to work in a Guix shell for almost a year now, but my last attempt did not go well (it crashed while initializing Gtk). To anyone who wants to try the GUI, I am sorry to inconvenience you, but I’m afraid I just have to ask you to please install Guile-GI yourself using the old-fashioned ./configure && make && make install method. If anyone happens to be able to get it to work in a Guix shell, please let me know, or open a PR on the Codeberg Git repository.

The only examples for how to use (schemacs ui) are in the test suite and the Schemacs Debugger. The only documentation so far are the comments in the source code, though I did try to be very thorough with comments.

The “Debugui” debugger works, but only has one single feature: the eval-expression command, which is bound to M-: (Alt-Colon). This command works the same as in #Emacs but you enter a Scheme language command instead. The #EmacsLisp interpreter is not yet connected to the GUI.

Now that this is merged, I am going to work on a few tasks in the Emacs Lisp interpreter that have been pending for more than a few weeks now. Then, back to creating new features in the GUI toward the goal of making it a useful program editor. And also, of course, writing some more documentation.

#tech #software #R7RS #SchemeLang

I have been banging my head against #Gtk3 for the past 3 weeks and all progress has pretty much come to a stand-still. No matter how simple and straight-forward my GUI is, Gtk makes it simply impossible to get the layout correct. I am now convinced that programming my own layout algorithm from scratch and using the GtkLayout container (which lets you place widgets at arbitrary X,Y coordinates) is the only way to proceed at this point. It is soooo frustrating.

The #Gtk documentation is good, but not at all good enough. The people on the Gnome Discourse have been very kind and helpful, and I truly appreciate the engagement I have had there, but ultimately I am still not able to solve my problems.

I have decided I need find some way to keep making progress without postponing the release of the work I have done so far for an indeterminate length of time. So rather than work out all the bugs in this version before merging it to the main Git branch, what I will do instead is have the main program launch a debugger window. The debugger window will have all layout calculated in advance, and all widgets will be declared once and only once throughout the lifetime of the application to avoid the reference counting issues. Obviously the debugger GUI will be very rigid, but you will at least be able to edit files and run commands in a REPL within this debugger.

Then maybe I can merge the code I have written to the main Git branch, and people will at least be able to use it through the debugger. Maybe also I could use this debugger to help with writing my layout algorithm. Also, I need to get back to the Emacs Lisp interpreter, I haven’t worked on it in almost two months now.

#tech #software #Lisp #Emacs #EmacsLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS

I have been banging my head against #Gtk3 for the past 3 weeks and all progress has pretty much come to a stand-still. No matter how simple and straight-forward my GUI is, Gtk makes it simply impossible to get the layout correct. I am now convinced that programming my own layout algorithm from scratch and using the GtkLayout container (which lets you place widgets at arbitrary X,Y coordinates) is the only way to proceed at this point. It is soooo frustrating.

The #Gtk documentation is good, but not at all good enough. The people on the Gnome Discourse have been very kind and helpful, and I truly appreciate the engagement I have had there, but ultimately I am still not able to solve my problems.

I have decided I need find some way to keep making progress without postponing the release of the work I have done so far for an indeterminate length of time. So rather than work out all the bugs in this version before merging it to the main Git branch, what I will do instead is have the main program launch a debugger window. The debugger window will have all layout calculated in advance, and all widgets will be declared once and only once throughout the lifetime of the application to avoid the reference counting issues. Obviously the debugger GUI will be very rigid, but you will at least be able to edit files and run commands in a REPL within this debugger.

Then maybe I can merge the code I have written to the main Git branch, and people will at least be able to use it through the debugger. Maybe also I could use this debugger to help with writing my layout algorithm. Also, I need to get back to the Emacs Lisp interpreter, I haven’t worked on it in almost two months now.

#tech #software #Lisp #Emacs #EmacsLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS

I have been banging my head against #Gtk3 for the past 3 weeks and all progress has pretty much come to a stand-still. No matter how simple and straight-forward my GUI is, Gtk makes it simply impossible to get the layout correct. I am now convinced that programming my own layout algorithm from scratch and using the GtkLayout container (which lets you place widgets at arbitrary X,Y coordinates) is the only way to proceed at this point. It is soooo frustrating.

The #Gtk documentation is good, but not at all good enough. The people on the Gnome Discourse have been very kind and helpful, and I truly appreciate the engagement I have had there, but ultimately I am still not able to solve my problems.

I have decided I need find some way to keep making progress without postponing the release of the work I have done so far for an indeterminate length of time. So rather than work out all the bugs in this version before merging it to the main Git branch, what I will do instead is have the main program launch a debugger window. The debugger window will have all layout calculated in advance, and all widgets will be declared once and only once throughout the lifetime of the application to avoid the reference counting issues. Obviously the debugger GUI will be very rigid, but you will at least be able to edit files and run commands in a REPL within this debugger.

Then maybe I can merge the code I have written to the main Git branch, and people will at least be able to use it through the debugger. Maybe also I could use this debugger to help with writing my layout algorithm. Also, I need to get back to the Emacs Lisp interpreter, I haven’t worked on it in almost two months now.

#tech #software #Lisp #Emacs #EmacsLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS

I have been banging my head against #Gtk3 for the past 3 weeks and all progress has pretty much come to a stand-still. No matter how simple and straight-forward my GUI is, Gtk makes it simply impossible to get the layout correct. I am now convinced that programming my own layout algorithm from scratch and using the GtkLayout container (which lets you place widgets at arbitrary X,Y coordinates) is the only way to proceed at this point. It is soooo frustrating.

The #Gtk documentation is good, but not at all good enough. The people on the Gnome Discourse have been very kind and helpful, and I truly appreciate the engagement I have had there, but ultimately I am still not able to solve my problems.

I have decided I need find some way to keep making progress without postponing the release of the work I have done so far for an indeterminate length of time. So rather than work out all the bugs in this version before merging it to the main Git branch, what I will do instead is have the main program launch a debugger window. The debugger window will have all layout calculated in advance, and all widgets will be declared once and only once throughout the lifetime of the application to avoid the reference counting issues. Obviously the debugger GUI will be very rigid, but you will at least be able to edit files and run commands in a REPL within this debugger.

Then maybe I can merge the code I have written to the main Git branch, and people will at least be able to use it through the debugger. Maybe also I could use this debugger to help with writing my layout algorithm. Also, I need to get back to the Emacs Lisp interpreter, I haven’t worked on it in almost two months now.

#tech #software #Lisp #Emacs #EmacsLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS

@momo cool!

Well then, please have a listen to the episodes of the #LispyGopherClimate podcast that me, @kentpitman and @screwlisp did these past few weeks:

• Kent Pitman presents his lisp condition system implemented for python
• Kent Pitman, Scott Zimmermann, Ramin Honary, Screwlisp: Lisp Conditions in Python
• Common Lisp condition handling lore
• Common Lisp condition system, code review of my programming example
• Common Lisp condition handling w/ Kent Pitman, Ramin Honary

#tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

@momo cool!

Well then, please have a listen to the episodes of the #LispyGopherClimate podcast that me, @kentpitman and @screwlisp did these past few weeks:

• Kent Pitman presents his lisp condition system implemented for python
• Kent Pitman, Scott Zimmermann, Ramin Honary, Screwlisp: Lisp Conditions in Python
• Common Lisp condition handling lore
• Common Lisp condition system, code review of my programming example
• Common Lisp condition handling w/ Kent Pitman, Ramin Honary

#tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

@momo cool!

Well then, please have a listen to the episodes of the #LispyGopherClimate podcast that me, @kentpitman and @screwlisp did these past few weeks:

• Kent Pitman presents his lisp condition system implemented for python
• Kent Pitman, Scott Zimmermann, Ramin Honary, Screwlisp: Lisp Conditions in Python
• Common Lisp condition handling lore
• Common Lisp condition system, code review of my programming example
• Common Lisp condition handling w/ Kent Pitman, Ramin Honary

#tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

@momo cool!

Well then, please have a listen to the episodes of the #LispyGopherClimate podcast that me, @kentpitman and @screwlisp did these past few weeks:

• Kent Pitman presents his lisp condition system implemented for python
• Kent Pitman, Scott Zimmermann, Ramin Honary, Screwlisp: Lisp Conditions in Python
• Common Lisp condition handling lore
• Common Lisp condition system, code review of my programming example
• Common Lisp condition handling w/ Kent Pitman, Ramin Honary

#tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

@screwlisp @kentpitman I’m just reading up on the MIT-Scheme condition system. Recent efforts to standardize this are defined in SRFI-255: “Restarting conditions”.

An older standards condition systems in Scheme was defined in SRFI-35: “Conditions”. And #Guile users can use the Guile implementation of SRFI-35 to make use of it.

I wish I had known about this two weeks ago when we first started talking about it on the #LispyGopherClimate show, but better late than never, I guess.

#tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

@screwlisp @kentpitman I’m just reading up on the MIT-Scheme condition system. Recent efforts to standardize this are defined in SRFI-255: “Restarting conditions”.

An older standards condition systems in Scheme was defined in SRFI-35: “Conditions”. And #Guile users can use the Guile implementation of SRFI-35 to make use of it.

I wish I had known about this two weeks ago when we first started talking about it on the #LispyGopherClimate show, but better late than never, I guess.

#tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

@screwlisp @kentpitman I’m just reading up on the MIT-Scheme condition system. Recent efforts to standardize this are defined in SRFI-255: “Restarting conditions”.

An older standards condition systems in Scheme was defined in SRFI-35: “Conditions”. And #Guile users can use the Guile implementation of SRFI-35 to make use of it.

I wish I had known about this two weeks ago when we first started talking about it on the #LispyGopherClimate show, but better late than never, I guess.

#tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

@screwlisp @kentpitman I’m just reading up on the MIT-Scheme condition system. Recent efforts to standardize this are defined in SRFI-255: “Restarting conditions”.

An older standards condition systems in Scheme was defined in SRFI-35: “Conditions”. And #Guile users can use the Guile implementation of SRFI-35 to make use of it.

I wish I had known about this two weeks ago when we first started talking about it on the #LispyGopherClimate show, but better late than never, I guess.

#tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

I am using Guile-GI the GObject Introspection framework for Guile, and discovered that the eq? predicate sometimes returns #t for two different symbols. Does #GOOPS allow overloading eq? on symbols such that it can return #t on different symbols? If so this seems like a huge problem to me, it completely violates the Scheme language specification. (Or should I ask, is this a “GOOPS oopsie?”)

Anyway, what happens is this: you can capture a Gtk keyboard event in an event handler, and extract the list of modifier keys pressed on that key event. It looks something like this:

(lambda (event)
  (let*-values (((state-ok modifiers) (event:get-state event))
               ((mod-bits)           (modifier-type->number modifiers))
               ((first-mod)           (car mod-bits)))
    (display "first modifier: ") (write first-mod) (newline)
    (display "is symbol? ") (write (symbol? first-mod)) (newline)
    (display "eq? to 'mod1-mask: ") (write (eq? 'mod1-mask first-mod)) (newline)
    #t
    ))

And the output of the above event handler, when I press a key with a CJK input method enabled (on latest Linux Mint) is this:

first modifier: modifier-reserved-25-mask
is symbol? #t
eq? to 'mod1-mask: #t

The fact that (eq? 'mod1-mask 'modifier-reserved-25-mask) when the 'modifier-reserved-25-mask has been obtained from a C-language FFI callback is a pretty bad thing to happen in a Scheme implementation, in my humble opinion.

#tech #software #Schemacs #SchemeLang #R7RS

I am using Guile-GI the GObject Introspection framework for Guile, and discovered that the eq? predicate sometimes returns #t for two different symbols. Does #GOOPS allow overloading eq? on symbols such that it can return #t on different symbols? If so this seems like a huge problem to me, it completely violates the Scheme language specification. (Or should I ask, is this a “GOOPS oopsie?”)

Anyway, what happens is this: you can capture a Gtk keyboard event in an event handler, and extract the list of modifier keys pressed on that key event. It looks something like this:

(lambda (event)
  (let*-values (((state-ok modifiers) (event:get-state event))
               ((mod-bits)           (modifier-type->number modifiers))
               ((first-mod)           (car mod-bits)))
    (display "first modifier: ") (write first-mod) (newline)
    (display "is symbol? ") (write (symbol? first-mod)) (newline)
    (display "eq? to 'mod1-mask: ") (write (eq? 'mod1-mask first-mod)) (newline)
    #t
    ))

And the output of the above event handler, when I press a key with a CJK input method enabled (on latest Linux Mint) is this:

first modifier: modifier-reserved-25-mask
is symbol? #t
eq? to 'mod1-mask: #t

The fact that (eq? 'mod1-mask 'modifier-reserved-25-mask) when the 'modifier-reserved-25-mask has been obtained from a C-language FFI callback is a pretty bad thing to happen in a Scheme implementation, in my humble opinion.

#tech #software #Schemacs #SchemeLang #R7RS

I am using Guile-GI the GObject Introspection framework for Guile, and discovered that the eq? predicate sometimes returns #t for two different symbols. Does #GOOPS allow overloading eq? on symbols such that it can return #t on different symbols? If so this seems like a huge problem to me, it completely violates the Scheme language specification. (Or should I ask, is this a “GOOPS oopsie?”)

Anyway, what happens is this: you can capture a Gtk keyboard event in an event handler, and extract the list of modifier keys pressed on that key event. It looks something like this:

(lambda (event)
  (let*-values (((state-ok modifiers) (event:get-state event))
               ((mod-bits)           (modifier-type->number modifiers))
               ((first-mod)           (car mod-bits)))
    (display "first modifier: ") (write first-mod) (newline)
    (display "is symbol? ") (write (symbol? first-mod)) (newline)
    (display "eq? to 'mod1-mask: ") (write (eq? 'mod1-mask first-mod)) (newline)
    #t
    ))

And the output of the above event handler, when I press a key with a CJK input method enabled (on latest Linux Mint) is this:

first modifier: modifier-reserved-25-mask
is symbol? #t
eq? to 'mod1-mask: #t

The fact that (eq? 'mod1-mask 'modifier-reserved-25-mask) when the 'modifier-reserved-25-mask has been obtained from a C-language FFI callback is a pretty bad thing to happen in a Scheme implementation, in my humble opinion.

#tech #software #Schemacs #SchemeLang #R7RS

I am using Guile-GI the GObject Introspection framework for Guile, and discovered that the eq? predicate sometimes returns #t for two different symbols. Does #GOOPS allow overloading eq? on symbols such that it can return #t on different symbols? If so this seems like a huge problem to me, it completely violates the Scheme language specification. (Or should I ask, is this a “GOOPS oopsie?”)

Anyway, what happens is this: you can capture a Gtk keyboard event in an event handler, and extract the list of modifier keys pressed on that key event. It looks something like this:

(lambda (event)
  (let*-values (((state-ok modifiers) (event:get-state event))
               ((mod-bits)           (modifier-type->number modifiers))
               ((first-mod)           (car mod-bits)))
    (display "first modifier: ") (write first-mod) (newline)
    (display "is symbol? ") (write (symbol? first-mod)) (newline)
    (display "eq? to 'mod1-mask: ") (write (eq? 'mod1-mask first-mod)) (newline)
    #t
    ))

And the output of the above event handler, when I press a key with a CJK input method enabled (on latest Linux Mint) is this:

first modifier: modifier-reserved-25-mask
is symbol? #t
eq? to 'mod1-mask: #t

The fact that (eq? 'mod1-mask 'modifier-reserved-25-mask) when the 'modifier-reserved-25-mask has been obtained from a C-language FFI callback is a pretty bad thing to happen in a Scheme implementation, in my humble opinion.

#tech #software #Schemacs #SchemeLang #R7RS

I have partially resolved the issue I mentioned in my #EmacsConf2025 presentation, regarding the closure of a lambda not correctly capturing it’s environment.

I say “partially” resolved because although my current solution results in correct program behavior, it does not consider let-bound variables inside of the closure. So variables declared locally to the closure using the let keyword will mask variables of the same name in the closure environment. A correct implementation will simply not include those masked variables in the closure environment at all. This can sometimes impact garbage collection, since a closure may be holding a variable which retains a large amount of memory, but that variable not accessible anywhere since it is masked by the let-bound variables in the closure.

However, I am eager to keep things moving, so I am merging this PR and opening a new issue to resolve the let-bindings problem later. To find out more, see issue #62 on Codeberg.

#tech #software #Emacs #EmacsConf #Scheme #R7RS #SchemeLang

I have partially resolved the issue I mentioned in my #EmacsConf2025 presentation, regarding the closure of a lambda not correctly capturing it’s environment.

I say “partially” resolved because although my current solution results in correct program behavior, it does not consider let-bound variables inside of the closure. So variables declared locally to the closure using the let keyword will mask variables of the same name in the closure environment. A correct implementation will simply not include those masked variables in the closure environment at all. This can sometimes impact garbage collection, since a closure may be holding a variable which retains a large amount of memory, but that variable not accessible anywhere since it is masked by the let-bound variables in the closure.

However, I am eager to keep things moving, so I am merging this PR and opening a new issue to resolve the let-bindings problem later. To find out more, see issue #62 on Codeberg.

#tech #software #Emacs #EmacsConf #Scheme #R7RS #SchemeLang

I have partially resolved the issue I mentioned in my #EmacsConf2025 presentation, regarding the closure of a lambda not correctly capturing it’s environment.

I say “partially” resolved because although my current solution results in correct program behavior, it does not consider let-bound variables inside of the closure. So variables declared locally to the closure using the let keyword will mask variables of the same name in the closure environment. A correct implementation will simply not include those masked variables in the closure environment at all. This can sometimes impact garbage collection, since a closure may be holding a variable which retains a large amount of memory, but that variable not accessible anywhere since it is masked by the let-bound variables in the closure.

However, I am eager to keep things moving, so I am merging this PR and opening a new issue to resolve the let-bindings problem later. To find out more, see issue #62 on Codeberg.

#tech #software #Emacs #EmacsConf #Scheme #R7RS #SchemeLang

I have partially resolved the issue I mentioned in my #EmacsConf2025 presentation, regarding the closure of a lambda not correctly capturing it’s environment.

I say “partially” resolved because although my current solution results in correct program behavior, it does not consider let-bound variables inside of the closure. So variables declared locally to the closure using the let keyword will mask variables of the same name in the closure environment. A correct implementation will simply not include those masked variables in the closure environment at all. This can sometimes impact garbage collection, since a closure may be holding a variable which retains a large amount of memory, but that variable not accessible anywhere since it is masked by the let-bound variables in the closure.

However, I am eager to keep things moving, so I am merging this PR and opening a new issue to resolve the let-bindings problem later. To find out more, see issue #62 on Codeberg.

#tech #software #Emacs #EmacsConf #Scheme #R7RS #SchemeLang

https://codeberg.org/ramin_hal9001/schemacs/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md

I have been getting a lot of inquiries about Schemacs lately, and so I think it is best to settle on a Code of Conduct (CoC) right now before I find myself in the awkward position of accepting a lot of patches from various people who later on turn out to hate each other. Hopefully we wont ever find ourselves in such a situation, but it is best to be prepared.

I decided to go with the Contributor Covenant 3.0, which provides a template for a CoC that adapts well to various projects. If I recall correctly, I believe I learned about it from Christine Lemmer-Webber @cwebber on one of her podcasts.

I am open to recommendations for changes to be made to the CoC as well, I understand that my knowledge of such things is imperfect and I am willing to learn about various opinions regarding codes-of-conduct if anyone is willing to teach me more.

And of course, #Schemacs is free software, so anyone is welcome to fork it and develop it separately if you disagree with the CoC. But as long as I am the project manager for #Schemacs I will make the executive decision about the CoC.

#tech #software #CodeOfConduct #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #Lisp #Emacs #FLOSS #FOSS

https://codeberg.org/ramin_hal9001/schemacs/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md

I have been getting a lot of inquiries about Schemacs lately, and so I think it is best to settle on a Code of Conduct (CoC) right now before I find myself in the awkward position of accepting a lot of patches from various people who later on turn out to hate each other. Hopefully we wont ever find ourselves in such a situation, but it is best to be prepared.

I decided to go with the Contributor Covenant 3.0, which provides a template for a CoC that adapts well to various projects. If I recall correctly, I believe I learned about it from Christine Lemmer-Webber @cwebber on one of her podcasts.

I am open to recommendations for changes to be made to the CoC as well, I understand that my knowledge of such things is imperfect and I am willing to learn about various opinions regarding codes-of-conduct if anyone is willing to teach me more.

And of course, #Schemacs is free software, so anyone is welcome to fork it and develop it separately if you disagree with the CoC. But as long as I am the project manager for #Schemacs I will make the executive decision about the CoC.

#tech #software #CodeOfConduct #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #Lisp #Emacs #FLOSS #FOSS

https://codeberg.org/ramin_hal9001/schemacs/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md

I have been getting a lot of inquiries about Schemacs lately, and so I think it is best to settle on a Code of Conduct (CoC) right now before I find myself in the awkward position of accepting a lot of patches from various people who later on turn out to hate each other. Hopefully we wont ever find ourselves in such a situation, but it is best to be prepared.

I decided to go with the Contributor Covenant 3.0, which provides a template for a CoC that adapts well to various projects. If I recall correctly, I believe I learned about it from Christine Lemmer-Webber @cwebber on one of her podcasts.

I am open to recommendations for changes to be made to the CoC as well, I understand that my knowledge of such things is imperfect and I am willing to learn about various opinions regarding codes-of-conduct if anyone is willing to teach me more.

And of course, #Schemacs is free software, so anyone is welcome to fork it and develop it separately if you disagree with the CoC. But as long as I am the project manager for #Schemacs I will make the executive decision about the CoC.

#tech #software #CodeOfConduct #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #Lisp #Emacs #FLOSS #FOSS

https://codeberg.org/ramin_hal9001/schemacs/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md

I have been getting a lot of inquiries about Schemacs lately, and so I think it is best to settle on a Code of Conduct (CoC) right now before I find myself in the awkward position of accepting a lot of patches from various people who later on turn out to hate each other. Hopefully we wont ever find ourselves in such a situation, but it is best to be prepared.

I decided to go with the Contributor Covenant 3.0, which provides a template for a CoC that adapts well to various projects. If I recall correctly, I believe I learned about it from Christine Lemmer-Webber @cwebber on one of her podcasts.

I am open to recommendations for changes to be made to the CoC as well, I understand that my knowledge of such things is imperfect and I am willing to learn about various opinions regarding codes-of-conduct if anyone is willing to teach me more.

And of course, #Schemacs is free software, so anyone is welcome to fork it and develop it separately if you disagree with the CoC. But as long as I am the project manager for #Schemacs I will make the executive decision about the CoC.

#tech #software #CodeOfConduct #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #Lisp #Emacs #FLOSS #FOSS

— will be live in about 5 minutes.

https://emacsconf.org/2025/watch/dev

Questions can be posted to this live chat: https://pad.emacsconf.org/2025-schemacs

EDIT: Thanks for all the great questions everyone. It is so encouraging for me to see that there is so much interest in this project, it really keeps me motivated to keep working on it.

#tech #software #Emacs #SoftwareDevelopment #EmacsConf #EmacsConf2025 #SchemeLang #R7RS #Scheme