home.social

#mitscheme — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #mitscheme, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @screwlisp @kentpitman I’m just reading up on the MIT-Scheme condition system. Recent efforts to standardize this are defined in SRFI-255: “Restarting conditions”.

    An older standards condition systems in Scheme was defined in SRFI-35: “Conditions”. And #Guile users can use the Guile implementation of SRFI-35 to make use of it.

    I wish I had known about this two weeks ago when we first started talking about it on the #LispyGopherClimate show, but better late than never, I guess.

    #tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

  2. @screwlisp @kentpitman I’m just reading up on the MIT-Scheme condition system. Recent efforts to standardize this are defined in SRFI-255: “Restarting conditions”.

    An older standards condition systems in Scheme was defined in SRFI-35: “Conditions”. And #Guile users can use the Guile implementation of SRFI-35 to make use of it.

    I wish I had known about this two weeks ago when we first started talking about it on the #LispyGopherClimate show, but better late than never, I guess.

    #tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

  3. @screwlisp @kentpitman I’m just reading up on the MIT-Scheme condition system. Recent efforts to standardize this are defined in SRFI-255: “Restarting conditions”.

    An older standards condition systems in Scheme was defined in SRFI-35: “Conditions”. And #Guile users can use the Guile implementation of SRFI-35 to make use of it.

    I wish I had known about this two weeks ago when we first started talking about it on the #LispyGopherClimate show, but better late than never, I guess.

    #tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

  4. @screwlisp @kentpitman I’m just reading up on the MIT-Scheme condition system. Recent efforts to standardize this are defined in SRFI-255: “Restarting conditions”.

    An older standards condition systems in Scheme was defined in SRFI-35: “Conditions”. And #Guile users can use the Guile implementation of SRFI-35 to make use of it.

    I wish I had known about this two weeks ago when we first started talking about it on the #LispyGopherClimate show, but better late than never, I guess.

    #tech #software #Lisp #CommonLisp #Scheme #SchemeLang #R7RS #MITScheme #Guile #GuileScheme

  5. Does anyone know of a page that details the history of why the #GNU Project has TWO implementations of the #Scheme programming language (#mitscheme and #guile)?

    I know guile was designed as an 'extension language' for other apps, but I'm slightly confused why they couldn't just use the mit-scheme they already had?

    What are the differences between them?

  6. CW: scheme question

    @fiskfan1999 I prefer #guile over #mitscheme because it is easier to script and shows stack trace's out of the box. Also it supports #r7rs (small). Note that no scheme platform exists that implements r7rs because it is not finished yet.

  7. xpost from another acct

    #askfedi I'm starting to learn #scheme as a possible alternative for using #go #golang in the future, especially for servers, backend type stuff. I was wondering if you could recommend a scheme implementation to use. I'm looking for one that is R7RS-compliant and has good documentation. Right now I am planning to use #mitscheme #gnuscheme. Thanks

  8. xpost from another acct

    #askfedi I'm starting to learn #scheme as a possible alternative for using #go #golang in the future, especially for servers, backend type stuff. I was wondering if you could recommend a scheme implementation to use. I'm looking for one that is R7RS-compliant and has good documentation. Right now I am planning to use #mitscheme #gnuscheme. Thanks

  9. xpost from another acct

    #askfedi I'm starting to learn #scheme as a possible alternative for using #go #golang in the future, especially for servers, backend type stuff. I was wondering if you could recommend a scheme implementation to use. I'm looking for one that is R7RS-compliant and has good documentation. Right now I am planning to use #mitscheme #gnuscheme. Thanks

  10. CW: scheme question
    #askfedi I'm starting to learn #scheme as a possible alternative for using #go #golang in the future, especially for servers, backend type stuff. I was wondering if you could recommend a scheme implementation to use. I'm looking for one that is R7RS-compliant and has good documentation. Right now I am planning to use #mitscheme #gnuscheme. Thanks
  11. CW: scheme question
    #askfedi I'm starting to learn #scheme as a possible alternative for using #go #golang in the future, especially for servers, backend type stuff. I was wondering if you could recommend a scheme implementation to use. I'm looking for one that is R7RS-compliant and has good documentation. Right now I am planning to use #mitscheme #gnuscheme. Thanks
  12. CW: scheme question
    #askfedi I'm starting to learn #scheme as a possible alternative for using #go #golang in the future, especially for servers, backend type stuff. I was wondering if you could recommend a scheme implementation to use. I'm looking for one that is R7RS-compliant and has good documentation. Right now I am planning to use #mitscheme #gnuscheme. Thanks
  13. CW: scheme question
    #askfedi I'm starting to learn #scheme as a possible alternative for using #go #golang in the future, especially for servers, backend type stuff. I was wondering if you could recommend a scheme implementation to use. I'm looking for one that is R7RS-compliant and has good documentation. Right now I am planning to use #mitscheme #gnuscheme. Thanks
  14. CW: scheme question
    #askfedi I'm starting to learn #scheme as a possible alternative for using #go #golang in the future, especially for servers, backend type stuff. I was wondering if you could recommend a scheme implementation to use. I'm looking for one that is R7RS-compliant and has good documentation. Right now I am planning to use #mitscheme #gnuscheme. Thanks
  15. Having followed the whole #GuileEmacs debate a few years ago, I was (and still am) surprised that #Edwin, the Emacs-family editor integrated into #MITScheme, never came up in these discussions.

    While it certainly lacks the bazillion libraries that power #Emacs, Edwin is as GNU Emacs-like as it gets - and it's programmable in #Scheme! It has a great buffer/listener combo, an #Info reader, shell facilities, you name it. Any Emacs user would feel right at home in it. And also: Scheme, man, Scheme!

    So, obviously, a Scheme-powered Emacs is not only possible, it has actually existed for quite a while now.