#peerreviews — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #peerreviews, aggregated by home.social.
-
"Drawing on an analysis of over 100000 articles in ecology-related disciplines [...], we show that the shift to pay-to-publish OA has already reduced participation by researchers from many middle-income countries."
https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/oik.11867#worldDomination #publishing #peerReviews #academicChatter #openAccess #scholastic #academic #academia #articles
-
"Drawing on an analysis of over 100000 articles in ecology-related disciplines [...], we show that the shift to pay-to-publish OA has already reduced participation by researchers from many middle-income countries."
https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/oik.11867#worldDomination #publishing #peerReviews #academicChatter #openAccess #scholastic #academic #academia #articles
-
"Drawing on an analysis of over 100000 articles in ecology-related disciplines [...], we show that the shift to pay-to-publish OA has already reduced participation by researchers from many middle-income countries."
https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/oik.11867#worldDomination #publishing #peerReviews #academicChatter #openAccess #scholastic #academic #academia #articles
-
"Drawing on an analysis of over 100000 articles in ecology-related disciplines [...], we show that the shift to pay-to-publish OA has already reduced participation by researchers from many middle-income countries."
https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/oik.11867#worldDomination #publishing #peerReviews #academicChatter #openAccess #scholastic #academic #academia #articles
-
"Drawing on an analysis of over 100000 articles in ecology-related disciplines [...], we show that the shift to pay-to-publish OA has already reduced participation by researchers from many middle-income countries."
https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/oik.11867#worldDomination #publishing #peerReviews #academicChatter #openAccess #scholastic #academic #academia #articles
-
The Importance of Peer Reviews By Humans As Oppose To The Machines
The peer review process is imperative for the advancement of knowledge and the promotion of innovation. It facilitates intellectual exchange by motivating researchers to enhance their methodologies, clarify their findings or interpretations, challenge assumptions, and even investigate potential new avenues that may not have been previously considered. Moreover, it serves as a catalyst for collaboration, accountability, and innovation, which are essential for the ongoing development of […] -
The Importance of Peer Reviews By Humans As Oppose To The Machines
The peer review process is imperative for the advancement of knowledge and the promotion of innovation. It facilitates intellectual exchange by motivating researchers to enhance their methodologies, clarify their findings or interpretations, challenge assumptions, and even investigate potential new avenues that may not have been previously considered. Moreover, it serves as a catalyst for collaboration, accountability, and innovation, which are essential for the ongoing development of […] -
The Importance of Peer Reviews By Humans As Oppose To The Machines
The peer review process is imperative for the advancement of knowledge and the promotion of innovation. It facilitates intellectual exchange by motivating researchers to enhance their methodologies, clarify their findings or interpretations, challenge assumptions, and even investigate potential new avenues that may not have been previously considered. Moreover, it serves as a catalyst for collaboration, accountability, and innovation, which are essential for the ongoing development of […] -
The Importance of Peer Reviews By Humans As Oppose To The Machines
The peer review process is imperative for the advancement of knowledge and the promotion of innovation. It facilitates intellectual exchange by motivating researchers to enhance their methodologies, clarify their findings or interpretations, challenge assumptions, and even investigate potential new avenues that may not have been previously considered. Moreover, it serves as a catalyst for collaboration, accountability, and innovation, which are essential for the ongoing development of […] -
The Importance of Peer Reviews By Humans As Oppose To The Machines
The peer review process is imperative for the advancement of knowledge and the promotion of innovation. It facilitates intellectual exchange by motivating researchers to enhance their methodologies, clarify their findings or interpretations, challenge assumptions, and even investigate potential new avenues that may not have been previously considered. Moreover, it serves as a catalyst for collaboration, accountability, and innovation, which are essential for the ongoing development of […] -
FYI: Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #Reddit #SocialMedia #ConsumerTrust
-
FYI: Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #Reddit #SocialMedia #ConsumerTrust
-
FYI: Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #Reddit #SocialMedia #ConsumerTrust
-
ICYMI: Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #AITrust #RedditInsights #ConsumerTrust
-
ICYMI: Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #AITrust #RedditInsights #ConsumerTrust
-
ICYMI: Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #AITrust #RedditInsights #ConsumerTrust
-
Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #SocialMediaTrends #ConsumerTrust #RedditCommunity
-
Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #SocialMediaTrends #ConsumerTrust #RedditCommunity
-
Influencer reviews lose to peer posts by 2x in US buying, Reddit finds: UK gap runs closer to 2.5x, while 60% of US Reddit users trust the platform over family when checking AI picks. Does commissioned research settle the point? https://ppc.land/influencer-reviews-lose-to-peer-posts-by-2x-in-us-buying-reddit-finds/ #InfluencerMarketing #PeerReviews #SocialMediaTrends #ConsumerTrust #RedditCommunity
-
Organizers of a prominent neuroscience conference face pushback on social media after applying hidden prompts to their papers to catch peer reviewers who are using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to referee papers.
. https://www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/scientists-decry-conferences-use-of-hidden-prompts-to-snare-ai-peer-reviews/ -
Organizers of a prominent neuroscience conference face pushback on social media after applying hidden prompts to their papers to catch peer reviewers who are using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to referee papers.
. https://www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/scientists-decry-conferences-use-of-hidden-prompts-to-snare-ai-peer-reviews/ -
Organizers of a prominent neuroscience conference face pushback on social media after applying hidden prompts to their papers to catch peer reviewers who are using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to referee papers.
. https://www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/scientists-decry-conferences-use-of-hidden-prompts-to-snare-ai-peer-reviews/ -
Organizers of a prominent neuroscience conference face pushback on social media after applying hidden prompts to their papers to catch peer reviewers who are using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to referee papers.
. https://www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/scientists-decry-conferences-use-of-hidden-prompts-to-snare-ai-peer-reviews/ -
Organizers of a prominent neuroscience conference face pushback on social media after applying hidden prompts to their papers to catch peer reviewers who are using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to referee papers.
. https://www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/scientists-decry-conferences-use-of-hidden-prompts-to-snare-ai-peer-reviews/ -
Reihe „Europawochen“ – Heute:
Christina Paulus und Giselheid Wagner erklären, wie Peer Review als Verfahren zur Qualitätsentwicklung in der Validierung genutzt werden kann. Sie betonen die Eignung des Verfahrens, um Validierungsprozesse transparenter, vergleichbarer und national wie Europaweit besser anschlussfähig zu machen.
⬇️
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=17826&pk_campaign=SocMed&pk_kwd=mastodon
#Europawochen #Europa #EU #Bildungspolitik #PeerReviews #peDOCS -
Reihe „Europawochen“ – Heute:
Christina Paulus und Giselheid Wagner erklären, wie Peer Review als Verfahren zur Qualitätsentwicklung in der Validierung genutzt werden kann. Sie betonen die Eignung des Verfahrens, um Validierungsprozesse transparenter, vergleichbarer und national wie Europaweit besser anschlussfähig zu machen.
⬇️
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=17826&pk_campaign=SocMed&pk_kwd=mastodon
#Europawochen #Europa #EU #Bildungspolitik #PeerReviews #peDOCS -
Reihe „Europawochen“ – Heute:
Christina Paulus und Giselheid Wagner erklären, wie Peer Review als Verfahren zur Qualitätsentwicklung in der Validierung genutzt werden kann. Sie betonen die Eignung des Verfahrens, um Validierungsprozesse transparenter, vergleichbarer und national wie Europaweit besser anschlussfähig zu machen.
⬇️
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=17826&pk_campaign=SocMed&pk_kwd=mastodon
#Europawochen #Europa #EU #Bildungspolitik #PeerReviews #peDOCS -
Reihe „Europawochen“ – Heute:
Christina Paulus und Giselheid Wagner erklären, wie Peer Review als Verfahren zur Qualitätsentwicklung in der Validierung genutzt werden kann. Sie betonen die Eignung des Verfahrens, um Validierungsprozesse transparenter, vergleichbarer und national wie Europaweit besser anschlussfähig zu machen.
⬇️
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=17826&pk_campaign=SocMed&pk_kwd=mastodon
#Europawochen #Europa #EU #Bildungspolitik #PeerReviews #peDOCS -
Reihe „Europawochen“ – Heute:
Christina Paulus und Giselheid Wagner erklären, wie Peer Review als Verfahren zur Qualitätsentwicklung in der Validierung genutzt werden kann. Sie betonen die Eignung des Verfahrens, um Validierungsprozesse transparenter, vergleichbarer und national wie Europaweit besser anschlussfähig zu machen.
⬇️
https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=17826&pk_campaign=SocMed&pk_kwd=mastodon
#Europawochen #Europa #EU #Bildungspolitik #PeerReviews #peDOCS -
Do #Gravitons need to exist? : Medium
Major #AI #Conference #Flooded with #PeerReviews written fully by AI : Nature
These people #Experienced near #Death. Here’s how it changed their #Lives. : Wa Po
Latest #KnowledgeLinks
-
Do #Gravitons need to exist? : Medium
Major #AI #Conference #Flooded with #PeerReviews written fully by AI : Nature
These people #Experienced near #Death. Here’s how it changed their #Lives. : Wa Po
Latest #KnowledgeLinks
-
Do #Gravitons need to exist? : Medium
Major #AI #Conference #Flooded with #PeerReviews written fully by AI : Nature
These people #Experienced near #Death. Here’s how it changed their #Lives. : Wa Po
Latest #KnowledgeLinks
-
Do #Gravitons need to exist? : Medium
Major #AI #Conference #Flooded with #PeerReviews written fully by AI : Nature
These people #Experienced near #Death. Here’s how it changed their #Lives. : Wa Po
Latest #KnowledgeLinks
-
Do #Gravitons need to exist? : Medium
Major #AI #Conference #Flooded with #PeerReviews written fully by AI : Nature
These people #Experienced near #Death. Here’s how it changed their #Lives. : Wa Po
Latest #KnowledgeLinks
-
A major #AIconference, the International Conference on Learning Representations (#ICLR), discovered that 21% of #peerreviews were fully #AIgenerated. #Researchers raised concerns about AI-generated #reviews, citing issues like #hallucinatedcitations and #vaguefeedback. Organisers will now use automated tools to assess submissions and reviews for AI use. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03506-6?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
A major #AIconference, the International Conference on Learning Representations (#ICLR), discovered that 21% of #peerreviews were fully #AIgenerated. #Researchers raised concerns about AI-generated #reviews, citing issues like #hallucinatedcitations and #vaguefeedback. Organisers will now use automated tools to assess submissions and reviews for AI use. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03506-6?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
A major #AIconference, the International Conference on Learning Representations (#ICLR), discovered that 21% of #peerreviews were fully #AIgenerated. #Researchers raised concerns about AI-generated #reviews, citing issues like #hallucinatedcitations and #vaguefeedback. Organisers will now use automated tools to assess submissions and reviews for AI use. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03506-6?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
A major #AIconference, the International Conference on Learning Representations (#ICLR), discovered that 21% of #peerreviews were fully #AIgenerated. #Researchers raised concerns about AI-generated #reviews, citing issues like #hallucinatedcitations and #vaguefeedback. Organisers will now use automated tools to assess submissions and reviews for AI use. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03506-6?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
A major #AIconference, the International Conference on Learning Representations (#ICLR), discovered that 21% of #peerreviews were fully #AIgenerated. #Researchers raised concerns about AI-generated #reviews, citing issues like #hallucinatedcitations and #vaguefeedback. Organisers will now use automated tools to assess submissions and reviews for AI use. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03506-6?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#RetractionWatch
Papers & #peerreviews with evidence of #ChatGPT writingRetraction Watch readers have likely heard about papers showing evidence that they were written by ChatGPT. We have reported on the phenomenon.
Here’s a list — relying on a search strategy developed by #GuillaumeCabanac, who has been posting the results on #PubPeer — of such papers that we’ll keep updated regularly. We also recommend Alex Glynn’s Academ-AI. Have a suggested entry? Use this form.
https://retractionwatch.com/papers-and-peer-reviews-with-evidence-of-chatgpt-writing/ -
#RetractionWatch
Papers & #peerreviews with evidence of #ChatGPT writingRetraction Watch readers have likely heard about papers showing evidence that they were written by ChatGPT. We have reported on the phenomenon.
Here’s a list — relying on a search strategy developed by #GuillaumeCabanac, who has been posting the results on #PubPeer — of such papers that we’ll keep updated regularly. We also recommend Alex Glynn’s Academ-AI. Have a suggested entry? Use this form.
https://retractionwatch.com/papers-and-peer-reviews-with-evidence-of-chatgpt-writing/ -
🧐Furthermore, the use of #AI to perform #academic #peerreviews is not only lazy, it's fundamentally #irresponsible and #unethical to the development of #scientific #research. Like errant or #corrupt priests and cardinals that needed to be ferreted out by the Church, this disturbing trend in #global #academicresearch, seemingly involving top-tier #universities, sorely needs to be nipped in the bud before it rots and festers the entire #credibility of new #science - to the detriment of #mankind.🤔
-
🧐Furthermore, the use of #AI to perform #academic #peerreviews is not only lazy, it's fundamentally #irresponsible and #unethical to the development of #scientific #research. Like errant or #corrupt priests and cardinals that needed to be ferreted out by the Church, this disturbing trend in #global #academicresearch, seemingly involving top-tier #universities, sorely needs to be nipped in the bud before it rots and festers the entire #credibility of new #science - to the detriment of #mankind.🤔
-
🧐Furthermore, the use of #AI to perform #academic #peerreviews is not only lazy, it's fundamentally #irresponsible and #unethical to the development of #scientific #research. Like errant or #corrupt priests and cardinals that needed to be ferreted out by the Church, this disturbing trend in #global #academicresearch, seemingly involving top-tier #universities, sorely needs to be nipped in the bud before it rots and festers the entire #credibility of new #science - to the detriment of #mankind.🤔
-
🧐Furthermore, the use of #AI to perform #academic #peerreviews is not only lazy, it's fundamentally #irresponsible and #unethical to the development of #scientific #research. Like errant or #corrupt priests and cardinals that needed to be ferreted out by the Church, this disturbing trend in #global #academicresearch, seemingly involving top-tier #universities, sorely needs to be nipped in the bud before it rots and festers the entire #credibility of new #science - to the detriment of #mankind.🤔
-
Nikkei Asia: ‘Positive review only’: Researchers hide AI prompts in papers. “Research papers from 14 academic institutions in eight countries — including Japan, South Korea and China — contained hidden prompts directing artificial intelligence tools to give them good reviews, Nikkei has found. Nikkei looked at English-language preprints — manuscripts that have yet to undergo formal peer […]
-
Nikkei Asia: ‘Positive review only’: Researchers hide AI prompts in papers. “Research papers from 14 academic institutions in eight countries — including Japan, South Korea and China — contained hidden prompts directing artificial intelligence tools to give them good reviews, Nikkei has found. Nikkei looked at English-language preprints — manuscripts that have yet to undergo formal peer […]
-
Does some #LLM love the words "interplay" and "kaleidoscope" because I've seen these words increasingly frequently in some #PeerReviews recently?
-
Does some #LLM love the words "interplay" and "kaleidoscope" because I've seen these words increasingly frequently in some #PeerReviews recently?
-
Does some #LLM love the words "interplay" and "kaleidoscope" because I've seen these words increasingly frequently in some #PeerReviews recently?
-
Does some #LLM love the words "interplay" and "kaleidoscope" because I've seen these words increasingly frequently in some #PeerReviews recently?
-
Does some #LLM love the words "interplay" and "kaleidoscope" because I've seen these words increasingly frequently in some #PeerReviews recently?
-
»#ChatGPT is transforming #peerreview — how can we use it responsibly? At major #computerscience publication venues, up to 17% of the #peerreviews are now written by #artificialintelligence.« https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03588-8?eicker.news #tech #media
-
»#ChatGPT is transforming #peerreview — how can we use it responsibly? At major #computerscience publication venues, up to 17% of the #peerreviews are now written by #artificialintelligence.« https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03588-8?eicker.news #tech #media
-
»#ChatGPT is transforming #peerreview — how can we use it responsibly? At major #computerscience publication venues, up to 17% of the #peerreviews are now written by #artificialintelligence.« https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03588-8?eicker.news #tech #media
-
»#ChatGPT is transforming #peerreview — how can we use it responsibly? At major #computerscience publication venues, up to 17% of the #peerreviews are now written by #artificialintelligence.« https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03588-8?eicker.news #tech #media
-
»#ChatGPT is transforming #peerreview — how can we use it responsibly? At major #computerscience publication venues, up to 17% of the #peerreviews are now written by #artificialintelligence.« https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03588-8?eicker.news #tech #media
-
Ein #Professor der #University of #California hat eine #Sammelklage gegen sechs große #akademischeVerlage, darunter #Elsevier und #Wiley, eingereicht. Die Klage wirft ihnen vor, durch wettbewerbswidrige Praktiken die wissenschaftliche #Forschung zu behindern und dabei enorme #Gewinne auf Kosten der #Akademiker zu erzielen. Kritisiert werden unentgeltliche #PeerReviews, das Verbot der Mehrfach-Einreichung von Manuskripten und lange #Begutachtungszeiten.
https://www.highereddive.com/news/6-major-academic-publishers-face-antitrust-lawsuit/727106/
-
Ein #Professor der #University of #California hat eine #Sammelklage gegen sechs große #akademischeVerlage, darunter #Elsevier und #Wiley, eingereicht. Die Klage wirft ihnen vor, durch wettbewerbswidrige Praktiken die wissenschaftliche #Forschung zu behindern und dabei enorme #Gewinne auf Kosten der #Akademiker zu erzielen. Kritisiert werden unentgeltliche #PeerReviews, das Verbot der Mehrfach-Einreichung von Manuskripten und lange #Begutachtungszeiten.
https://www.highereddive.com/news/6-major-academic-publishers-face-antitrust-lawsuit/727106/
-
Ein #Professor der #University of #California hat eine #Sammelklage gegen sechs große #akademischeVerlage, darunter #Elsevier und #Wiley, eingereicht. Die Klage wirft ihnen vor, durch wettbewerbswidrige Praktiken die wissenschaftliche #Forschung zu behindern und dabei enorme #Gewinne auf Kosten der #Akademiker zu erzielen. Kritisiert werden unentgeltliche #PeerReviews, das Verbot der Mehrfach-Einreichung von Manuskripten und lange #Begutachtungszeiten.
https://www.highereddive.com/news/6-major-academic-publishers-face-antitrust-lawsuit/727106/