#executive-power — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #executive-power, aggregated by home.social.
-
When Everything Becomes a National Security Threat
-
When Everything Becomes a National Security Threat
-
When Everything Becomes a National Security Threat
-
When Everything Becomes a National Security Threat
-
America After 9/11: 25 Years of Fear, War, Surveillance and Permanent Emergency
-
America After 9/11: 25 Years of Fear, War, Surveillance and Permanent Emergency
-
America After 9/11: 25 Years of Fear, War, Surveillance and Permanent Emergency
-
Accountability Lag: When Consequences Arrive Too Late (Part 12 of 19)
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — September 8, 2026
Here’s the uncomfortable part.
In this system, consequences are slower than actions.
That’s not a bug. That’s how it’s built.
Action is immediate. Accountability is delayed.
When the executive branch acts, it acts now.
- an order is signed
- an enforcement action happens
- a policy is implemented
All of that takes effect immediately or very close to it.
Accountability does not.
- investigations take time
- courts take time
- oversight takes time
That gap between action and consequence is where a lot of real-world impact lives.
The system is not symmetrical
It’s tempting to think that checks and balances operate at the same speed as executive action.
They do not.
The executive can move in hours or days.
Accountability mechanisms often move in:
- weeks
- months
- sometimes years
That creates asymmetry.
The system allows action to run ahead of review.
What happens in the gap
During that gap:
- policies are enforced
- people are affected
- institutions adjust
Even if a policy is later modified, blocked, or reversed, the initial effects have already occurred.
This matters because:
- temporary actions can have permanent consequences
- short-term enforcement can create long-term outcomes
The system does not automatically rewind.
Legal review is retrospective
Courts do not usually act before something happens. They respond after.
That means:
- harm, if it occurs, has already occurred
- policy, if implemented, has already been implemented
Judicial review is essential, but it is not preventive in most cases. It is corrective.
And correction is slower than action.
Oversight follows, not leads
Congressional oversight operates on hearings, reports, and investigations.
These are important tools, but they are:
- scheduled
- procedural
- often reactive
By the time oversight is fully engaged, the event it is responding to is no longer hypothetical. It is historical.
That does not reduce the value of oversight. It defines its timing.
Internal accountability has limits
Agencies conduct internal reviews. Inspectors general investigate. Departments assess their own actions.
These processes can produce findings and recommendations.
But they are also:
- bounded by internal structures
- influenced by institutional incentives
- subject to delay
Internal accountability can identify problems. It does not always prevent them.
Tradeoffs in system design
This structure offers clear advantages:
- rapid response capability
- centralized decision-making
- operational flexibility
But it also produces predictable effects:
- delayed correction
- uneven accountability
- difficulty reversing outcomes
These are not incidental. They are part of how the system is designed.
When speed becomes the advantage
A system that can act faster than it can be checked creates a strategic advantage for whoever controls the point of action.
That does not eliminate accountability. It changes when it arrives.
And timing matters.
If consequences come after effects, then the effects shape the environment in which accountability is applied.
What this means
This is where several threads in this series come together.
- executive action is fast
- enforcement is immediate
- communication is continuous
Accountability is slower than all of them.
Under the Trump presidency, where emphasis has been placed on speed, visibility, and direct action, this timing gap becomes more visible.
The system does not fail because accountability is slow.
It operates exactly as designed.
The question is whether the gap between action and accountability is acceptable, and under what conditions it becomes a problem.
This series will continue to examine how these timing dynamics affect legitimacy, trust, and long-term system stability.
If this work helps you understand what’s happening, help me keep it going: https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNews
For more from Cliff Potts, see https://cliffpotts.org
If you are interested in resisting authoritarian rule and understanding the systems behind it, see https://endfascism.xyz
References
McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179.
#Accountability #DonaldTrump #ExecutivePower #governanceSystems #institutionalAnalysis #politicalOversight #publicPolicy -
Enforcement and Discretion: How Policy Becomes Action (Part 11 of 19)
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — September 1, 2026
At some point, every policy leaves paper and hits a person.
That moment matters more than most of the process that came before it.
Because whatever was written, debated, announced, or signed only becomes real when someone inside the system decides how to enforce it.
Policy is not the action. Enforcement is.
A law can exist. An executive order can exist. A directive can exist.
None of that guarantees uniform action.
What matters is how agencies interpret those instructions and how individual officers apply them in real-world situations. That is where discretion lives.
Discretion is not a loophole. It is built into the system.
Street-level bureaucrats, enforcement officers, regulators, and administrators all make decisions about:
- when to act
- how aggressively to act
- when not to act
Research has long shown that policy outcomes are shaped as much by these decisions as by the policies themselves (Lipsky, 1980).
Discretion scales up
When you expand enforcement priorities, you are not just changing policy. You are increasing the number of decisions being made under pressure.
Each additional enforcement action introduces:
- judgment calls
- incomplete information
- time constraints
At scale, this produces variation.
Some actions will be routine. Some will be contested. Some will become incidents.
The system does not operate with perfect consistency. It cannot.
Signals from the top
Discretion is guided by signals.
Those signals come from:
- formal policy language
- internal memos
- leadership statements
- public messaging
When leadership emphasizes urgency, threat, or priority, enforcement behavior tends to adjust accordingly.
This does not require direct orders in every case. It requires a shared understanding of what is expected.
Over time, that understanding becomes embedded in how agencies operate.
Concentration of enforcement activity
Under conditions of expanded enforcement, activity often concentrates in specific areas.
This can be geographic, such as particular states or cities, or functional, such as immigration enforcement or regulatory compliance.
Concentration produces clusters:
- repeated interactions
- repeated decision points
- increased likelihood of escalation
When incidents occur, they are often not isolated. They are part of a pattern generated by sustained activity in a specific domain.
Contested outcomes
Not all enforcement actions are accepted as legitimate.
Some produce disputes over:
- use of force
- interpretation of authority
- accuracy of information
These disputes are then handled through:
- internal review
- legal challenges
- public scrutiny
The presence of contested outcomes does not mean the system has failed. It does indicate that enforcement is operating under tension.
Accountability pathways
In theory, accountability is handled through:
- agency investigations
- inspector general reviews
- courts
- legislative oversight
In practice, these processes can be slow, uneven, or limited in scope.
This creates a timing gap:
- enforcement happens immediately
- accountability happens later
During that gap, the effects of enforcement are already in place.
Tradeoffs in enforcement strategy
Expanded enforcement offers:
- visible policy implementation
- demonstration of executive control
- immediate impact
But it also introduces:
- increased risk of error
- greater number of contested incidents
- higher demand on oversight mechanisms
These are not accidental side effects. They are predictable outcomes of scaling enforcement activity.
What this means
This is where governance stops being abstract.
You can talk about executive power, Congress, courts, and media all day long. None of it matters as much as what happens when policy is enforced.
Under the Trump presidency, emphasis on enforcement has been a consistent feature across multiple policy areas.
That emphasis increases the number of real-world interactions between the state and individuals.
Each interaction carries consequences.
Some are routine. Some are disputed. Some become the cases that define how the system is judged.
The system does not get evaluated on what it says. It gets evaluated on what it does.
This series will continue to examine how enforcement patterns interact with accountability, legitimacy, and institutional stability.
If this work helps you understand what’s happening, help me keep it going: https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNews
For more from Cliff Potts, see https://cliffpotts.org
If you are interested in resisting authoritarian rule and understanding the systems behind it, see https://endfascism.xyz
References
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
#Accountability #DonaldTrump #ExecutivePower #governanceSystems #institutionalAnalysis #lawEnforcement #publicPolicy -
Going Public: Mobilization as a Governance Tool in the Trump Presidency (Part 9 of 19)
By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — August 18, 2026
Let’s break the fourth wall for a second.
By this point, this series had started to sound a little too much like a political science lecture. The information was sound. The tone was getting a little too classroom. That is not what this series is for. So from here forward, the goal is the same, but the voice is going to be more live. Less lecture hall. More field notes from a country watching an operating system under load.
This week’s subject is simple: Donald Trump does not just govern through the state. He also governs through the crowd.
The crowd is part of the machinery
A presidency can work through formal channels, meaning agencies, departments, memos, and law. It can also work through public pressure. When a president goes straight to supporters, speaks over institutions, and turns public attention into leverage, that is not just politics on the side. It is part of governance.
Political science has had a name for this for years: “going public.” The basic idea is that presidents try to move other institutions by moving the audience first (Canes-Wrone, 2001; Eshbaugh-Soha, 2004; Peake, 2008).
Trump did not invent that tool. He did push it harder, louder, and more constantly than most of his predecessors.
This is not outreach. It is pressure.
In a conventional White House, public messaging supports policy. In Trump’s model, public messaging often does more than support policy. It pressures Congress, intimidates rivals, disciplines allies, and frames the terms of debate before institutions have fully reacted.
That matters because public appeals can change the environment in which legislators, agencies, and even reporters operate. The president does not need to win every argument on the merits if he can define what the argument is about before anyone else does.
Attention is a weapon
Modern political systems run on limited attention. There are only so many headlines, hearings, clips, and arguments that the public can absorb in a day. A president who can seize that attention repeatedly gains an operational advantage.
Trump’s style has always been built around that fact. He creates bursts of attention, sustains conflict, and forces both allies and opponents to respond on his terrain. In that model, outrage is not always a failure state. Sometimes it is the fuel.
This is where some observers get it wrong. They think the goal is persuasion in the traditional sense. Sometimes it is. Often it is saturation. If every institution has to react to the president’s frame, then the president is still setting the pace.
Formal power and crowd power reinforce each other
The White House has formal instruments ready at hand. It can issue executive orders, presidential memoranda, proclamations, and public statements through official channels (The White House, 2026).
But formal documents alone do not explain the method. The larger pattern is this: formal action is paired with public messaging so the legal move and the political move arrive together. One tells the bureaucracy what to do. The other tells the public how to understand it.
That pairing reduces the time available for critics, agencies, or Congress to define events first.
Congress hears the crowd too
A member of Congress does not just read a bill. He also reads polling, watches clips, monitors donor pressure, and tracks activist noise. When a president goes public, he is not speaking only to voters. He is speaking through voters toward other officeholders.
Presidents gain leverage when they influence what other institutions are forced to spend time talking about (Peake, 2008; Canes-Wrone, 2001). Public attention becomes a channel of influence.
The strength of this method is speed
This style of governance has clear advantages.
It is fast.
It is visible.
It keeps supporters engaged.
It can make institutions look slow or reactive.A White House that looks active can dominate a Congress that looks procedural. Trump has consistently used motion and visibility to shape perception before outcomes are fully clear.
The weakness of this method is distortion
There is a cost. When a presidency governs through permanent mobilization, the line between administration and campaign begins to blur. Public life becomes more reactive. Institutions are pushed to answer bursts of conflict instead of slower standards of evidence and process.
That can weaken shared factual baselines. It can also reward escalation, because escalation attracts attention and attention moves the system.
Over time, this changes expectations. Citizens begin to expect continuous public performance from executive leadership, not just governance.
What this means
Trump’s presidency cannot be understood only through formal powers written into law. It operates as a hybrid system. Part of it runs through institutions. Part of it runs through attention, narrative, and public mobilization.
The crowd is not outside the system. In this model, the crowd is part of the system.
That does not make the crowd sovereign. It does mean that executive power is being exercised in a way that treats public reaction as a usable input.
That is not incidental. It is structural.
If this work helps you understand what’s happening, help me keep it going: https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNews
For more from Cliff Potts, see https://cliffpotts.org
If you are interested in resisting authoritarian rule and understanding the systems behind it, see https://endfascism.xyz
References
Canes-Wrone, B. (2001). The president’s legislative influence from public appeals. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 313–329.
Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2004). Presidential influence over the systemic agenda. Congress & the Presidency, 31(2), 223–246.
Peake, J. S. (2008). The agenda-setting impact of major presidential TV addresses. Political Communication, 25(1), 23–44.
The White House. (2026). Presidential actions. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/
#agendaSetting #DonaldTrump #ExecutivePower #governanceAnalysis #politicalSystems #presidentialCommunication #publicMobilization -
Mayoral Aspirations of City Administrators Questioned
-
Mayoral Aspirations of City Administrators Questioned
-
Mayoral Aspirations of City Administrators Questioned
-
Mayoral Aspirations of City Administrators Questioned
-
Article II Removal Power and the Roberts Court’s Reckless Hubris
In weakening checks on executive power, the Roberts Court overlooks the wisdom of its predecessors. The majority opinion…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #America #ExecutivePower #independentagencies #regulatoryindependence #SupremeCourt #trumpv.slaughter #U.S.SupremeCourt #UnitedStatesofAmerica
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/773287/ -
https://www.europesays.com/people/158553/ Article II Removal Power and the Roberts Court’s Reckless Hubris #ExecutivePower #IndependentAgencies #JohnRoberts #RegulatoryIndependence #SupremeCourt #TrumpVSlaughter #USSupremeCourt
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/151718/ 4 Takeaways From the Supreme Court’s 2025–2026 Term #Alito #BirthrightCitizenship #ChiefJusticeJohnRoberts #ClarenceThomas #ConservativeCourt #ConsumerFinancialProtectionBureau #DonaldTrump #ExecutivePower #FederalTradeCommission #JohnRoberts #PresidentJoeBiden #RebeccaSlaughter #TrumpCourt #USSupremeCourt
-
Trump’s Hormuz Toll Plan Looks a Lot Like a Protection Racket
Trump's Hormuz toll plan would charge ships 20 percent of cargo value for U.S. protection, raising legal, constitutional, and international law questions.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/trump-watch/trumps-hormuz-toll-plan/
-
Trump’s Hormuz Toll Plan Looks a Lot Like a Protection Racket
Trump's Hormuz toll plan would charge ships 20 percent of cargo value for U.S. protection, raising legal, constitutional, and international law questions.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/trump-watch/trumps-hormuz-toll-plan/
-
Trump’s Hormuz Toll Plan Looks a Lot Like a Protection Racket
Trump's Hormuz toll plan would charge ships 20 percent of cargo value for U.S. protection, raising legal, constitutional, and international law questions.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/trump-watch/trumps-hormuz-toll-plan/
-
How the Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Is Reshaping Executive Power
-
Supreme Court upholds Fed independence, limits presidential power
By CHRISTOPHER RUGABER WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday said the Federal Reserve, unlike any other…
#Economy #DonaldTrump #executivepower #Fedindependence #FederalReserve #FederalReserveSystem #interestrates #LisaCook #SupremeCourt
https://www.europesays.com/3110693/ -
Supreme Court upholds Fed independence, limits presidential power
By CHRISTOPHER RUGABER WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday said the Federal Reserve, unlike any other…
#Economy #DonaldTrump #executivepower #Fedindependence #FederalReserve #FederalReserveSystem #interestrates #LisaCook #SupremeCourt
https://www.europesays.com/3110447/ -
Supreme Court upholds Fed independence, limits presidential power
By CHRISTOPHER RUGABER WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday said the Federal Reserve, unlike any other…
#Economy #DonaldTrump #executivepower #Fedindependence #FederalReserve #FederalReserveSystem #interestrates #LisaCook #SupremeCourt
https://www.europesays.com/3107736/ -
https://www.europesays.com/people/?p=139258 The Roberts Court and the Disappearing Congress #ElenaKagan #ExecutiveAuthority #ExecutivePower #FederalReserve #Humphrey'sExecutor #JohnRoberts #MajorQuestionsDoctrine #RobertsCourt #TrumpVSlaughter #TrumpVCook
-
Did the Supreme Court just reshape presidential power? Harry Litman reveals the true impact of *Trump v. Slaughter*, arguing the 6-3 ruling demolishes independent agencies by embracing a unitary executive theory. This decision allows presidents to fire officials at will, threatening expertise across vital sectors. Learn more about this unprecedented shift. https://harrylitman.substack.com/p/yes-the-supreme-court-rebuked-trump #SupremeCourt #ExecutivePower #IndependentAgencies
-
John Roberts Believes In The Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio
-
John Roberts Believes In The Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio
-
John Roberts Believes In The Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio
-
John Roberts Believes In The Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/134397/ John Roberts fought for decades to overturn Humphrey’s Executor #ChiefJustice #ExecutivePower #FederalTradeCommission #IndependentAgencies #JohnRoberts #POTUS #PresidentOfTheUnitedStates #PresidentRonaldReagan #ReaganAdministration #SoniaSotomayor #SupremeCourt #Trump #WhiteHouse
-
Supreme Court upholds Fed independence, limits presidential power
By CHRISTOPHER RUGABER WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday said the Federal Reserve, unlike any other…
#Economy #DonaldTrump #executivepower #Fedindependence #FederalReserve #FederalReserveSystem #interestrates #LisaCook #SupremeCourt
https://www.europesays.com/3097553/ -
⚖️ SCOTUS just dropped its most consequential term-ending rulings in decades — executive power, the Fed, mail ballots, Carroll & digital privacy.
thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/supreme-court/supreme-court-reshapes-executive-power
-
⚖️ SCOTUS just dropped its most consequential term-ending rulings in decades — executive power, the Fed, mail ballots, Carroll & digital privacy.
thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/supreme-court/supreme-court-reshapes-executive-power
-
⚖️ SCOTUS just dropped its most consequential term-ending rulings in decades — executive power, the Fed, mail ballots, Carroll & digital privacy.
thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/supreme-court/supreme-court-reshapes-executive-power
-
⚖️ SCOTUS just dropped its most consequential term-ending rulings in decades — executive power, the Fed, mail ballots, Carroll & digital privacy.
thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/supreme-court/supreme-court-reshapes-executive-power
-
⚖️ The Supreme Court just ended its term with some of the most consequential rulings in a generation — overturning a 91-year-old precedent on presidential power, protecting the Federal Reserve, upholding mail ballot grace periods, letting the E. Jean Carroll judgment stand, and expanding Fourth Amendment digital privacy rights. All in one day.
What it means for every American — and what comes next — at The Democracy Advocate.
🔗 https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/supreme-court/supreme-court-reshapes-executive-power/
#SupremeCourt #SCOTUS #ExecutivePower #ElectionLaw #FourthAmendment #FederalReserve #HumphreysExecutor #Democracy #Accountability #USPolitics -
Supreme Court Reshapes Executive Power in Historic Term-Ending Rulings
Supreme Court reshapes executive power in landmark rulings overturning Humphrey's Executor, protecting the Federal Reserve, upholding mail ballot grace periods, and expanding digital privacy rights.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/supreme-court/supreme-court-reshapes-executive-power/
-
Supreme Court Reshapes Executive Power in Historic Term-Ending Rulings
Supreme Court reshapes executive power in landmark rulings overturning Humphrey's Executor, protecting the Federal Reserve, upholding mail ballot grace periods, and expanding digital privacy rights.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/supreme-court/supreme-court-reshapes-executive-power/
-
The justices ruled in the case of former #FTC member #RebeccaSlaughter, whom #Trump fired WITHOUT cause despite a provision of #federal #law that requires a reason. The logic of the decision extends to other agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Consumer Product Safety Commission, where Trump also has fired board members.
#law #Independence #ExecutivePower #HumphreysExecutor #SeparationOfPowers #Congress #democracy
-
The justices ruled in the case of former #FTC member #RebeccaSlaughter, whom #Trump fired WITHOUT cause despite a provision of #federal #law that requires a reason. The logic of the decision extends to other agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Consumer Product Safety Commission, where Trump also has fired board members.
#law #Independence #ExecutivePower #HumphreysExecutor #SeparationOfPowers #Congress #democracy
-
The justices ruled in the case of former #FTC member #RebeccaSlaughter, whom #Trump fired WITHOUT cause despite a provision of #federal #law that requires a reason. The logic of the decision extends to other agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Consumer Product Safety Commission, where Trump also has fired board members.
#law #Independence #ExecutivePower #HumphreysExecutor #SeparationOfPowers #Congress #democracy
-
The justices ruled in the case of former #FTC member #RebeccaSlaughter, whom #Trump fired WITHOUT cause despite a provision of #federal #law that requires a reason. The logic of the decision extends to other agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Consumer Product Safety Commission, where Trump also has fired board members.
#law #Independence #ExecutivePower #HumphreysExecutor #SeparationOfPowers #Congress #democracy
-
#Trump #robertscourt #SCOTUS #executivepower
Next step to an “imperial Presidency”? https://lyldenlawnews.com/2026/06/28/next-step-to-an-imperial-presidency/
-
#Trump #robertscourt #SCOTUS #executivepower
Next step to an “imperial Presidency”? https://lyldenlawnews.com/2026/06/28/next-step-to-an-imperial-presidency/
-
#Trump #robertscourt #SCOTUS #executivepower
Next step to an “imperial Presidency”? https://lyldenlawnews.com/2026/06/28/next-step-to-an-imperial-presidency/
-
#Trump #robertscourt #SCOTUS #executivepower
Next step to an “imperial Presidency”? https://lyldenlawnews.com/2026/06/28/next-step-to-an-imperial-presidency/
-
#SCOTUS Expands Trump’s #ExecutivePower Over #Immigration
The court handed #Trump victories in his push to rescind #deportation & for hundreds of thousands of people & turn away #immigrants at the southern border.
#law #immigration #Constitution #SeparationOfPowers #ChecksAndBalances #judiciary #legislation #authoritarianism #autocracy #dictatorship #fascism #tyranny #racism #WhiteSupremacy #WhiteChristianNationalism #PartisanCourt #ActivistCourt
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/us/politics/supreme-court-temporary-protected-status.html?unlocked_article_code=1.s1A.fkE6.E-jXQRTpMCY6&smid=nytcore-ios-share -
#SCOTUS Expands Trump’s #ExecutivePower Over #Immigration
The court handed #Trump victories in his push to rescind #deportation & for hundreds of thousands of people & turn away #immigrants at the southern border.
#law #immigration #Constitution #SeparationOfPowers #ChecksAndBalances #judiciary #legislation #authoritarianism #autocracy #dictatorship #fascism #tyranny #racism #WhiteSupremacy #WhiteChristianNationalism #PartisanCourt #ActivistCourt
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/us/politics/supreme-court-temporary-protected-status.html?unlocked_article_code=1.s1A.fkE6.E-jXQRTpMCY6&smid=nytcore-ios-share -
#SCOTUS Expands Trump’s #ExecutivePower Over #Immigration
The court handed #Trump victories in his push to rescind #deportation & for hundreds of thousands of people & turn away #immigrants at the southern border.
#law #immigration #Constitution #SeparationOfPowers #ChecksAndBalances #judiciary #legislation #authoritarianism #autocracy #dictatorship #fascism #tyranny #racism #WhiteSupremacy #WhiteChristianNationalism #PartisanCourt #ActivistCourt
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/us/politics/supreme-court-temporary-protected-status.html?unlocked_article_code=1.s1A.fkE6.E-jXQRTpMCY6&smid=nytcore-ios-share -
#SCOTUS Expands Trump’s #ExecutivePower Over #Immigration
The court handed #Trump victories in his push to rescind #deportation & for hundreds of thousands of people & turn away #immigrants at the southern border.
#law #immigration #Constitution #SeparationOfPowers #ChecksAndBalances #judiciary #legislation #authoritarianism #autocracy #dictatorship #fascism #tyranny #racism #WhiteSupremacy #WhiteChristianNationalism #PartisanCourt #ActivistCourt
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/us/politics/supreme-court-temporary-protected-status.html?unlocked_article_code=1.s1A.fkE6.E-jXQRTpMCY6&smid=nytcore-ios-share -
Regime Change Chapter 21 Details Trump Team’s Epstein Crisis
Regime Change Chapter 21 details alleged Trump team turmoil over Epstein files, DOJ secrecy, MAGA backlash, and White House damage control.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/trump-watch/regime-change-chapter-21/
-
Regime Change Chapter 21 Details Trump Team’s Epstein Crisis
Regime Change Chapter 21 details alleged Trump team turmoil over Epstein files, DOJ secrecy, MAGA backlash, and White House damage control.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/trump-watch/regime-change-chapter-21/
-
Regime Change Chapter 21 Details Trump Team’s Epstein Crisis
Regime Change Chapter 21 details alleged Trump team turmoil over Epstein files, DOJ secrecy, MAGA backlash, and White House damage control.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/trump-watch/regime-change-chapter-21/
-
Regime Change Chapter 21 Details Trump Team’s Epstein Crisis
Regime Change Chapter 21 details alleged Trump team turmoil over Epstein files, DOJ secrecy, MAGA backlash, and White House damage control.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/trump-watch/regime-change-chapter-21/
-
Senate Votes to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers in Rare Rebuke
Senate Votes to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers as bipartisan senators rebuke the White House over congressional authority and the Iran conflict.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/u-s-politics/senate-votes-to-limit-trump/
-
Senate Votes to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers in Rare Rebuke
Senate Votes to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers as bipartisan senators rebuke the White House over congressional authority and the Iran conflict.https://thedemocracyadvocate.com/news-to-know/u-s-politics/senate-votes-to-limit-trump/
-
"This threat to states’ sovereignty is vastly greater than those addressed in the Court’s prior federalism jurisprudence. And a willful President can do far more harm to a state’s finances than a federal court hearing challenge to a state agency’s violation of federal law."
#Trump #spendingpower #federalism #executivepowerPower of the Purse V: How Transformations at the National Level Threaten Federalism https://balkin.blogspot.com/2026/06/power-of-purse-v-how-transformations-at.html
-
"This threat to states’ sovereignty is vastly greater than those addressed in the Court’s prior federalism jurisprudence. And a willful President can do far more harm to a state’s finances than a federal court hearing challenge to a state agency’s violation of federal law."
#Trump #spendingpower #federalism #executivepowerPower of the Purse V: How Transformations at the National Level Threaten Federalism https://balkin.blogspot.com/2026/06/power-of-purse-v-how-transformations-at.html
-
"This threat to states’ sovereignty is vastly greater than those addressed in the Court’s prior federalism jurisprudence. And a willful President can do far more harm to a state’s finances than a federal court hearing challenge to a state agency’s violation of federal law."
#Trump #spendingpower #federalism #executivepowerPower of the Purse V: How Transformations at the National Level Threaten Federalism https://balkin.blogspot.com/2026/06/power-of-purse-v-how-transformations-at.html