home.social

Search

1000 results for “W_Lucht”

  1. @W_Lucht I remember the time well. We were afraid of the rain, we were afraid of the food, we were afraid of these incredible long half-life time spans of radioactive elements. I still have a copy of Gudrun Pausewangs "Die Wolke" around, which is a heck of a scary reading as an 11 year old. #tchernobyl

  2. @W_Lucht Wow! #regeneration worthy of the name! (Writing from London's Elephant&Castle, where a great deal of social housing has been demolished but hey, we're getting a new shopping centre...)

  3. @W_Lucht

    Hey Wolfgang, sorry for OffTopic.

    I've been searching on Umweltrat-de for information on the embedded CO2 in CCS.
    You know, like, how much more gas has to be burned in order to capture the CO2.
    And additionally, how much energy is required to make the solvent that goes into the CCS process, and how much energy goes into transport and storage.

    This new-ish Greenpeace publication
    greenpeace.org/aotearoa/story/

    says "10 to 40% more energy" is required, but then quotes this surprisingly old source from 2006... jstor.org/stable/48526261?refr

    This umweltrat.de/SharedDocs/Downlo
    names Bongartz et al 2015 for
    "Gleichzeitig sinkt aufgrund des Energiebedarfs für die Abscheidung der Wirkungsgrad des Kraftwerks je nach Abscheideverfahren , wodurch der Brennstoffbedarf erhöht wird."

    I don't have access to Bongartz et al 2015. Do you? Where did their information come from, and is it publicly available?

    The energy carrier used in a power plant itself is necessarily the same as used for power generation, I guess.
    But the energy for making the solvent and for transport and storage of the captured CO2 might be from a different source, potentially renewable. So that's why I'd like to have this split into two parts.

    If a CCS+gas power plant needs, lets say, 3x more gas to actually remove CO2 from power generation compared to a gas power plant without CCS,

    this CCS+gas incurs 3x more methane leakage!
    AND also 3x more CO2.
    So a test installation that allegedly removes 1Mt of CO2 per year, only removes 330kt from power generation, and the remaining 670kt removed were CO2 from the removal process itself?
    Or in other words, 1Mt removed leads to 2Mt emitted?

    I think, this information must be out there in the public debate. Especially now when the Green's newly legislated gas power plants of 12.5GW have been increased by the new government to 20 GW.

    CCS means more gas is burned. The removal efficiency is bad. The methane leaks alone are making this endeavour even worse than just burning coal.

    Thank you for your help!

    #CCS #CH4 #CO2 #FossilFuels #climatechange

  4. @W_Lucht Thank you for fighting this narratives. I heard them several times during the #Kirchentag and not in all debates they were pushed back. I will have a look in the reccording later, since there were a lot of (climate related) events simultanously and one had to select one. I gave the climate witnesses of global South my attention. Sadly, that event was not recorded.

  5. @W_Lucht

    To the extent that science is devoted to, and funded to, make profits in our #ConsumerSociety, it's primary benefit to our surviving #ClimateChange lies in the human relationships and communities it creates and the actions of those communities in getting climate change addressed.

  6. @W_Lucht

    To the extent that science is devoted to, and funded to, make profits in our #ConsumerSociety, it's primary benefit to our surviving #ClimateChange lies in the human relationships and communities it creates and the actions of those communities in getting climate change addressed.

  7. @W_Lucht

    To the extent that science is devoted to, and funded to, make profits in our #ConsumerSociety, it's primary benefit to our surviving #ClimateChange lies in the human relationships and communities it creates and the actions of those communities in getting climate change addressed.

  8. @W_Lucht

    To the extent that science is devoted to, and funded to, make profits in our #ConsumerSociety, it's primary benefit to our surviving #ClimateChange lies in the human relationships and communities it creates and the actions of those communities in getting climate change addressed.

  9. @W_Lucht

    To the extent that science is devoted to, and funded to, make profits in our #ConsumerSociety, it's primary benefit to our surviving #ClimateChange lies in the human relationships and communities it creates and the actions of those communities in getting climate change addressed.

  10. @W_Lucht
    I'm sure what he means by "obliging young people to a year of mandatory social service " is he want more free labor so he can increase his #concentrationOfWealth
    #democracy is more than how we vote!

  11. @W_Lucht
    Women concerned about their reproductive rights (#Roe, #IVF, #Contraception)…

    Young voters concerned about #GlobalWarming & #ClimateChange

    #Black voters wondering what #BlackJobs are; #BLM & #DEI

    People concerned about protecting #Ukraine & #Taiwan

    #Hispanic & #Muslim voters tired of being scapegoated for all violent crime…

    #Shooting victims who support #CommonSense #GunLaws (like a ban on #AR15-style weapons & #BumpStocks)…

    NONE of these people should be voting for T****.

  12. @W_Lucht
    I like this idea.

    I wonder if we could create a shadow system like this here and use it as a metric or learning process to show how well or how poorly our system is working.
    I'm sure the #RNC and #DNC and conservative are against the whole idea of people choosing their representatives in a fair election.

    not sure how to go about it since just getting folks to use one system is hard.

    #democracy is more than how we vote!

    #rankChoice #voting

  13. @W_Lucht
    I like this idea.

    I wonder if we could create a shadow system like this here and use it as a metric or learning process to show how well or how poorly our system is working.
    I'm sure the #RNC and #DNC and conservative are against the whole idea of people choosing their representatives in a fair election.

    not sure how to go about it since just getting folks to use one system is hard.

    #democracy is more than how we vote!

    #rankChoice #voting

  14. @W_Lucht
    I like this idea.

    I wonder if we could create a shadow system like this here and use it as a metric or learning process to show how well or how poorly our system is working.
    I'm sure the #RNC and #DNC and conservative are against the whole idea of people choosing their representatives in a fair election.

    not sure how to go about it since just getting folks to use one system is hard.

    #democracy is more than how we vote!

    #rankChoice #voting

  15. @W_Lucht
    I like this idea.

    I wonder if we could create a shadow system like this here and use it as a metric or learning process to show how well or how poorly our system is working.
    I'm sure the #RNC and #DNC and conservative are against the whole idea of people choosing their representatives in a fair election.

    not sure how to go about it since just getting folks to use one system is hard.

    #democracy is more than how we vote!

    #rankChoice #voting

  16. @W_Lucht
    I like this idea.

    I wonder if we could create a shadow system like this here and use it as a metric or learning process to show how well or how poorly our system is working.
    I'm sure the #RNC and #DNC and conservative are against the whole idea of people choosing their representatives in a fair election.

    not sure how to go about it since just getting folks to use one system is hard.

    #democracy is more than how we vote!

    #rankChoice #voting

  17. @W_Lucht @Umweltbundesamt @umweltrat

    Umverteilungspolitik.
    Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen.
    Sagt es doch gleich.

    Jetzt bei @meinbge unter finanzierung.mein-grundeinkommen.de/Konfigurator ausprobieren wie viel Umverteilung wie viel Freiheit zur Entfaltung erzeugt.

    Mein Ansatz wäre aus dem Vollen zu schöpfen. #GiantLeap nennt es @earth4all

  18. @W_Lucht

    It's bad that it had to come to this point.

    It is good that the #danger to #humanity is finally being openly expressed on a broad basis.

    It's a shame that it's only now being noticed.

    Our #experts, such as Antje #Boëtius, Maja #Göpel, Claudia #Kempfert, have been trying for years to point out the known facts and the consequences to #people, #politics and #econony.

  19. @W_Lucht

    It's not only climate change. 😵

    #FusionReactors won't save us.
    #ElectricVehicles won't save us.
    Technology won't save us.

    We need #degrowth. Now.