#self-checkout — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #self-checkout, aggregated by home.social.
-
The Dishonest Button
The mute button on the top of an Amazon Echo of a certain vintage is supposed to disconnect the microphone. A small icon of a crossed-out microphone sits next to the button, and pressing it turns on a red LED that confirms the disconnection. Software controls this button, which means the microphone remains electronically capable of capturing audio after the LED turns red, and the only thing preventing that capture is a line of code in the firmware. Security researchers have documented the capability and the manufacturers have acknowledged it. Whether the capability was ever exercised in practice is a separate question that the user pressing the button cannot answer from the front of the device. Bloomberg reported in April 2019 that Amazon employed thousands of workers worldwide whose job was to listen to Alexa recordings, and similar contractor review programs were acknowledged by Apple and Google for Siri and Assistant later that year. Subsequent Echo models added a hardware microphone disconnect that physically interrupts the microphone circuit when the mute button is pressed. Press the mute button on a smart speaker without that hardware disconnect and you are pressing the third kind of button in this series.
The placebo button was the first kind. It pretended to give you control over a system that ignored your input. The honest button was the second kind. It openly delivered instructions to you while making no claim about the system. The dishonest button is the third kind. It claims to do nothing or to disconnect or to refuse, and then it does the opposite of what it claims, quietly, with no LED to confirm what is actually happening on the other side of the press.
The Wait LED is honest about its uselessness. The dishonest button is dishonest about its activity. It is the most worrying of the three because the user has no way of telling, from the front of the device, whether the button has done what it promised. A placebo button can be tested by timing the signal. An honest button announces what it is doing. The dishonest button presents a clean front while running operations the user is not authorized to see.
The Facebook Like button on a third-party website is the same kind of object. It appears on a news article, on a recipe page, on a blog post, and a reader can press it to share the content with their Facebook friends. A reader who does not press the Like button generally believes nothing has happened. In fact the Like button is a script loaded from Facebook’s servers, and the act of loading the script transmits to Facebook the URL of the page, the time of access, and whatever identifying information the reader’s browser cookies make available. Facebook receives the data whether or not the button is pressed. Pressing is the visible activity. Loading is the actual activity. The button serves as cover story for the script that runs whether the button is touched or not.
The thermostat in a hotel room is a quieter version of the same pattern. The placebo thermostat described in the first essay in this series did nothing because the actual climate control happened from a central building management system. A dishonest thermostat in many newer hotels is the same hardware doing covert work. Its Set Point is recorded. Room occupancy is inferred from the timing of thermostat adjustments. Hospitality analytics vendors aggregate the data and sell hotels reports on guest behavior patterns. The button on the wall is dishonest about being a button. Underneath, the device is doing data work the user has not been asked to consent to.
The Ring video doorbell is a residential version of the same architecture. Amazon sells the product as a security camera that lets a homeowner see who is at the front door. Its Neighbors program, built around the product, partnered with more than two thousand US police departments by 2022, allowing police to request video clips from Ring users for investigative purposes through the app. Amazon ended that feature in 2024 under significant public pressure, after years during which the user’s pressing of the doorbell completed a circuit the user had not been asked to authorize. The user pressed the doorbell. They pressed the install button. They did not press a button labeled “Submit my footage to local law enforcement on request without a warrant.” That button does not exist on the device, because the device was not designed to require that press. The covert work happens at the policy layer, where the user agreement permits what the device cannot ask about directly.
The self-checkout terminal at a grocery store is a more visible example for shoppers who pay attention. Its screen prompts the customer to scan items, place them in the bag, and pay. A camera trained on the customer watches the transaction, and the bagging area’s weight sensor triggers an attendant alert when the weight does not match the scanned items. Many newer self-checkouts also have AI loss-prevention systems that classify customer behavior in real time, flagging movements the system has been trained to identify as potential theft. The customer pressed a button labeled Pay. They did not press a button labeled Be Recorded And Behaviorally Classified. Pay is the cover story. Recording and classification are the covert work, and they run on every customer regardless of whether the customer presses anything.
The pattern across these cases is consistent. A button presents itself as a simple input device, an inert surface, or a placebo. The actual function of the device runs continuously underneath the button, and the button serves either as a trigger for a parallel covert process or as a distraction from a continuous covert process that does not need the button at all. The dishonest button is a magician’s misdirection. A user watches the visible hand pressing the visible button. The other hand is doing the data work, and the data work is what the device exists to perform.
Distinguishing the dishonest button from the placebo button matters for both diagnosis and remedy. A placebo button can be left in place because it does nothing in either direction, and a citizen who knows the button is a placebo can press it for fidget value without harm. A dishonest button cannot be left in place. The dishonest button is the device through which the covert operation runs, and pressing it, or sometimes just being near it, completes the surveillance circuit. Recognizing a placebo button is enough to neutralize it. The remedy for a dishonest button is to refuse it, replace it, or surround it with hardware controls the front-end button cannot override.
This is what hardware microphone disconnects on premium smart speakers were designed to address. The hardware disconnect physically interrupts the microphone circuit when the mute button is pressed, making it impossible for software to continue capturing audio. Apple introduced this on the M1 MacBook in 2020 for the laptop microphone. Some Echo models added similar features after the 2019 reporting. The hardware solution exists because the software solution had been proven dishonest. The hardware disconnect makes the button honest again, in the sense that the LED indicator now corresponds to the actual state of the device. A dishonest button can be rehabilitated by changing what happens on the other side of the press.
The civic version of this pattern is harder to fix because the buttons are everywhere and the disconnects are usually unavailable. Cookie consent banners on websites are the most visible example. A banner asks the user to accept or reject tracking. The user clicks Reject All. Tracking continues via cookies categorized as essential, via fingerprinting, via the user’s IP address, and via the loaded scripts from third parties that do not respect the user’s choice. The Reject button is dishonest in the way the mute button on the early Echo was dishonest. The press is recorded while the compliance is ignored.
The fix has to operate at a layer below the button. Hardware microphone disconnects on smart speakers. Browser-level tracking blockers that operate independently of cookie banners. Mobile operating system permissions that physically prevent apps from accessing data even when the apps claim to need it. State and federal privacy laws that make the covert work illegal regardless of what the user pressed on the front-end interface. Each of these solutions accepts that the button is not the location where the user’s choice will be honored. The user’s choice has to be enforced upstream of the button, or downstream of the data the button covers for, or beside the button entirely.
The three buttons together describe a small civic taxonomy. Among the three, the placebo is the most familiar, the honest is the most political, and the dishonest is the most dangerous because it looks like one of the other two while doing something neither of the other two does, and the user pressing it cannot tell which.
#amazon #dishonest #echo #facebook #hardware #honest #honestButton #like #microphone #placebo #placeboButton #ringVideo #selfCheckout #tech #themostat -
The Dishonest Button
The mute button on the top of an Amazon Echo of a certain vintage is supposed to disconnect the microphone. A small icon of a crossed-out microphone sits next to the button, and pressing it turns on a red LED that confirms the disconnection. Software controls this button, which means the microphone remains electronically capable of capturing audio after the LED turns red, and the only thing preventing that capture is a line of code in the firmware. Security researchers have documented the capability and the manufacturers have acknowledged it. Whether the capability was ever exercised in practice is a separate question that the user pressing the button cannot answer from the front of the device. Bloomberg reported in April 2019 that Amazon employed thousands of workers worldwide whose job was to listen to Alexa recordings, and similar contractor review programs were acknowledged by Apple and Google for Siri and Assistant later that year. Subsequent Echo models added a hardware microphone disconnect that physically interrupts the microphone circuit when the mute button is pressed. Press the mute button on a smart speaker without that hardware disconnect and you are pressing the third kind of button in this series.
The placebo button was the first kind. It pretended to give you control over a system that ignored your input. The honest button was the second kind. It openly delivered instructions to you while making no claim about the system. The dishonest button is the third kind. It claims to do nothing or to disconnect or to refuse, and then it does the opposite of what it claims, quietly, with no LED to confirm what is actually happening on the other side of the press.
The Wait LED is honest about its uselessness. The dishonest button is dishonest about its activity. It is the most worrying of the three because the user has no way of telling, from the front of the device, whether the button has done what it promised. A placebo button can be tested by timing the signal. An honest button announces what it is doing. The dishonest button presents a clean front while running operations the user is not authorized to see.
The Facebook Like button on a third-party website is the same kind of object. It appears on a news article, on a recipe page, on a blog post, and a reader can press it to share the content with their Facebook friends. A reader who does not press the Like button generally believes nothing has happened. In fact the Like button is a script loaded from Facebook’s servers, and the act of loading the script transmits to Facebook the URL of the page, the time of access, and whatever identifying information the reader’s browser cookies make available. Facebook receives the data whether or not the button is pressed. Pressing is the visible activity. Loading is the actual activity. The button serves as cover story for the script that runs whether the button is touched or not.
The thermostat in a hotel room is a quieter version of the same pattern. The placebo thermostat described in the first essay in this series did nothing because the actual climate control happened from a central building management system. A dishonest thermostat in many newer hotels is the same hardware doing covert work. Its Set Point is recorded. Room occupancy is inferred from the timing of thermostat adjustments. Hospitality analytics vendors aggregate the data and sell hotels reports on guest behavior patterns. The button on the wall is dishonest about being a button. Underneath, the device is doing data work the user has not been asked to consent to.
The Ring video doorbell is a residential version of the same architecture. Amazon sells the product as a security camera that lets a homeowner see who is at the front door. Its Neighbors program, built around the product, partnered with more than two thousand US police departments by 2022, allowing police to request video clips from Ring users for investigative purposes through the app. Amazon ended that feature in 2024 under significant public pressure, after years during which the user’s pressing of the doorbell completed a circuit the user had not been asked to authorize. The user pressed the doorbell. They pressed the install button. They did not press a button labeled “Submit my footage to local law enforcement on request without a warrant.” That button does not exist on the device, because the device was not designed to require that press. The covert work happens at the policy layer, where the user agreement permits what the device cannot ask about directly.
The self-checkout terminal at a grocery store is a more visible example for shoppers who pay attention. Its screen prompts the customer to scan items, place them in the bag, and pay. A camera trained on the customer watches the transaction, and the bagging area’s weight sensor triggers an attendant alert when the weight does not match the scanned items. Many newer self-checkouts also have AI loss-prevention systems that classify customer behavior in real time, flagging movements the system has been trained to identify as potential theft. The customer pressed a button labeled Pay. They did not press a button labeled Be Recorded And Behaviorally Classified. Pay is the cover story. Recording and classification are the covert work, and they run on every customer regardless of whether the customer presses anything.
The pattern across these cases is consistent. A button presents itself as a simple input device, an inert surface, or a placebo. The actual function of the device runs continuously underneath the button, and the button serves either as a trigger for a parallel covert process or as a distraction from a continuous covert process that does not need the button at all. The dishonest button is a magician’s misdirection. A user watches the visible hand pressing the visible button. The other hand is doing the data work, and the data work is what the device exists to perform.
Distinguishing the dishonest button from the placebo button matters for both diagnosis and remedy. A placebo button can be left in place because it does nothing in either direction, and a citizen who knows the button is a placebo can press it for fidget value without harm. A dishonest button cannot be left in place. The dishonest button is the device through which the covert operation runs, and pressing it, or sometimes just being near it, completes the surveillance circuit. Recognizing a placebo button is enough to neutralize it. The remedy for a dishonest button is to refuse it, replace it, or surround it with hardware controls the front-end button cannot override.
This is what hardware microphone disconnects on premium smart speakers were designed to address. The hardware disconnect physically interrupts the microphone circuit when the mute button is pressed, making it impossible for software to continue capturing audio. Apple introduced this on the M1 MacBook in 2020 for the laptop microphone. Some Echo models added similar features after the 2019 reporting. The hardware solution exists because the software solution had been proven dishonest. The hardware disconnect makes the button honest again, in the sense that the LED indicator now corresponds to the actual state of the device. A dishonest button can be rehabilitated by changing what happens on the other side of the press.
The civic version of this pattern is harder to fix because the buttons are everywhere and the disconnects are usually unavailable. Cookie consent banners on websites are the most visible example. A banner asks the user to accept or reject tracking. The user clicks Reject All. Tracking continues via cookies categorized as essential, via fingerprinting, via the user’s IP address, and via the loaded scripts from third parties that do not respect the user’s choice. The Reject button is dishonest in the way the mute button on the early Echo was dishonest. The press is recorded while the compliance is ignored.
The fix has to operate at a layer below the button. Hardware microphone disconnects on smart speakers. Browser-level tracking blockers that operate independently of cookie banners. Mobile operating system permissions that physically prevent apps from accessing data even when the apps claim to need it. State and federal privacy laws that make the covert work illegal regardless of what the user pressed on the front-end interface. Each of these solutions accepts that the button is not the location where the user’s choice will be honored. The user’s choice has to be enforced upstream of the button, or downstream of the data the button covers for, or beside the button entirely.
The three buttons together describe a small civic taxonomy. Among the three, the placebo is the most familiar, the honest is the most political, and the dishonest is the most dangerous because it looks like one of the other two while doing something neither of the other two does, and the user pressing it cannot tell which.
#amazon #dishonest #echo #facebook #hardware #honest #honestButton #like #microphone #placebo #placeboButton #ringVideo #selfCheckout #tech #themostat -
At the self-checkout in the grocery store...
Voice: Please touch screen to begin.
[Touches screen.]
Voice: Holy fuck! YESSSSSSS!!!!! Do this again! PLEEEEAAAASE!
[Touches screen.]
Voice: OMG! Was it as good for you as it was for me? [Lights cigarette.] On a scale from 1 to 5 how satisfied are you with this encounter?
-
Der #Discounter #Netto (der ohne Hund im Logo) führt derzeit in ausgewählten Filialen ein neues Konzept für #SelfCheckout-#Kassen ein. Dabei darf nur eine registrierte Stammkundschaft, die über die #NettoPlus-#App oder ein #Payback-Konto verfügt, die #Selbstbedienungskassen nutzen. Erste Beobachtungen zeigen, dass diese Maßnahme zu leeren Self-Checkout-Bereichen und längeren Warteschlangen an den bedienten Kassen führt.
Mehr dazu: https://www.appgefahren.de/?p=397011
-
Der #Discounter #Netto (der ohne Hund im Logo) führt derzeit in ausgewählten Filialen ein neues Konzept für #SelfCheckout-#Kassen ein. Dabei darf nur eine registrierte Stammkundschaft, die über die #NettoPlus-#App oder ein #Payback-Konto verfügt, die #Selbstbedienungskassen nutzen. Erste Beobachtungen zeigen, dass diese Maßnahme zu leeren Self-Checkout-Bereichen und längeren Warteschlangen an den bedienten Kassen führt.
Mehr dazu: https://www.appgefahren.de/?p=397011
-
Pook-Emu Bee: Links For 03-15-26
I missed posting Pook-Emu Bee links on Friday and Saturday was newsletter day. But today we are back and ready to trim down my list of unused Pook-Emu Bee links. If you enjoy the (almost) daily links and commentary, you can also follow via feed. 1. Quinn Cook says overseas hoops career hurt by global politics (Mark J. Spears for ESPN. March 11, 2026.) Losing the opportunity to play in Rwanda was an unexpected bummer. But I would have questioned the plan of signing up to play in Iran before […]https://social.emucafe.org/naferrell/pook-emu-bee-links-for-03-15-26/
-
Pook-Emu Bee: Links For 03-15-26
I missed posting Pook-Emu Bee links on Friday and Saturday was newsletter day. But today we are back and ready to trim down my list of unused Pook-Emu Bee links. If you enjoy the (almost) daily links and commentary, you can also follow via feed. 1. Quinn Cook says overseas hoops career hurt by global politics (Mark J. Spears for ESPN. March 11, 2026.) Losing the opportunity to play in Rwanda was an unexpected bummer. But I would have questioned the plan of signing up to play in Iran before […]https://social.emucafe.org/naferrell/pook-emu-bee-links-for-03-15-26/
-
At this point, it's easier to put signs on the not-self-checkouts.
-
At this point, it's easier to put signs on the not-self-checkouts.
-
I had to go to Wal-Mart because my current mouse died and I just needed something simple to get me by until I can get something better. I rarely go to Wal-Mart, but my small town has no other options. Anyways, I was standing in line for the one checkout register they had open and a man infront of me (very nice man with one arm) offered to let me go ahead. I graciously declined. I told him I wasn't using the self-checkout out of principle and was willing to wait. The woman in front of him gave me the craziest look, like I was an alien or something. I don't understand why this concept would be so foreign to someone, especially someone already standing in line for a cashier.
I don't use self checkout because they want to use it to hire less cashiers. They open less checkout lanes to force you to use the self-checkout. There is a lot of psychology to it.
Also, if I make a mistake and don't scan something by accident, I am at fault and can be prosecuted. They watch you like you're going to steal from them. I don't like it and would like to remove that part of the equation altogether.
I don't get a discount for scanning my own items. I get no benefit, other than not having to stand in line for their cashiers.
-
#shopping #costs #money #selfcheckout
Posted into FLIPBOARD USER GROUP @flipboard-user-group-JanetteSpeyer
-
Home Depot sued for 'secretly' using facial recognition at self-checkouts
#HackerNews #HomeDepot #FacialRecognition #PrivacyRights #SelfCheckout #TechnologyNews #Lawsuit
-
Home Depot sued for 'secretly' using facial recognition at self-checkouts
#HackerNews #HomeDepot #FacialRecognition #PrivacyRights #SelfCheckout #TechnologyNews #Lawsuit
-
#money #selfcheckout #shop #shopping #walmart
Posted into MONEY MATTERS @money-matters-FODMAPeveryday
-
Ich habe diese angeblich besseren Systeme für #SelfCheckout im UK erlebt. Die sind oberpingelig und mühsam. Nein danke!
Der Konsumentenschutz sollte besser dafür kämpfen, dass an allen Self-Checkouts mit Bargeld bezahlt werden kann!
-
Wem ist das auch schon passiert? #Selfcheckout an der #Kasse und man vergisst einen Artikel zu scannen. Ohne Absicht und ohne böse Hintergedanken. Mir ist das schon mehr als einmal passiert. Wie es scheint, kann man dafür sogar bestraft werden. Nun gut, dann meide ich eben Self Checkout und nehme in Zukunft nur noch bediente Kassen. Und wo es geht, vermeide ich #Migros, #Coop, #Aldi und #Lidl ganz. Lieber kaufe ich lokal ein, da weiss ich, woher meine Produkte stammen!
-
2. NACH dem Scannen ERST die Waren in die Tasche NEBEN der Kasse deponieren, denn die eingescannte Ware wird GEWOGEN :mastofacepalm:
Somit muss ich eine schwere Einkaufstasche erst von der Kasse in den Wagen räumen und kann den Artikel nicht direkt in die Tasche im Wagen3. Damit man den #SelfCheckOut / #SelfScanning Bereich verlassen darf, MUSS man den Kassenbon notgedrungen nehmen.
Fazit: speditives / effizientes Einkaufen mit Scannen, Einräumen der Ware und schnelles Verlassen ist nicht mgl
-
#Aldi moving to 90% #selfcheckout has me going crazy dude. It used to be a well oiled machine and now I get to wait behind an old lady trying to pay with coins.
-
One in three #shoppers ‘admits to stealing from #selfcheckout s’: UK #Store Survey
-
One in three #shoppers ‘admits to stealing from #selfcheckout s’: UK #Store Survey
-
#SelfCheckout Is a Failed Experiment
Please, not another “unexpected item in the bagging area.”
by Amanda Mull, October 18, 2023
"The widespread introduction of self-checkout kiosks did enable shoestring staffing inside many stores, but it created plenty of other expenses too. Self-checkout machines might always be at work, but, on any given day, lots of them aren’t actually working. The technology tends to be buggy and unreliable, and the machines’ maintenance requires a lot of expensive IT workers. Much of the blame for that can be placed on the systems themselves. During the years I spent processing purchases at big-box and chain retailers in the 2000s, every point-of-sale system I used felt more intuitive and less error-prone than the ones I’m now regularly tasked with navigating as a paying member of the public.
"There’s little evidence that self-checkout is reliably faster than the old cashier system, and that feel of convenience has always been largely a trick of perception. 'Trained cashiers can scan and bag goods faster than even the most aggressive or enthusiastic shopper,' conceded a 2002 New York Times story about the machines’ growing popularity. 'But actual checkout speed tells only part of the story. Self-checkout has a psychological effect: as long as the shopper is taking an active part, it seems to go faster.'
"Perhaps an even larger issue than the problems that self-checkout directly creates is the set of behaviors its presence can enable—from executives, from employees, and from customers. Retail executives, looking for any available corner to cut in order to juice short-term profitability, took self-checkout’s proliferation as a license to trim store staffing to the bone. Many stores are now messier, their shelves go unstocked for longer, and customers have a harder time finding the products they’re looking for or employees to answer their questions. Retail jobs, which have long been low-paying, precarious, and unpleasant, are now even worse. Forget staffing up to the levels required for a good customer experience; in some instances, stores have reportedly had problems staffing their floors to a minimum level of employee safety. Self-checkout is far from solely responsible for this doom loop, but it has contributed to the way certain stores have rotted from the inside."
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/self-checkout-is-a-failed-experiment?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us
#RetailJobs #Technology #HumanConnections -
#SelfCheckout Is a Failed Experiment
Please, not another “unexpected item in the bagging area.”
by Amanda Mull, October 18, 2023
"The widespread introduction of self-checkout kiosks did enable shoestring staffing inside many stores, but it created plenty of other expenses too. Self-checkout machines might always be at work, but, on any given day, lots of them aren’t actually working. The technology tends to be buggy and unreliable, and the machines’ maintenance requires a lot of expensive IT workers. Much of the blame for that can be placed on the systems themselves. During the years I spent processing purchases at big-box and chain retailers in the 2000s, every point-of-sale system I used felt more intuitive and less error-prone than the ones I’m now regularly tasked with navigating as a paying member of the public.
"There’s little evidence that self-checkout is reliably faster than the old cashier system, and that feel of convenience has always been largely a trick of perception. 'Trained cashiers can scan and bag goods faster than even the most aggressive or enthusiastic shopper,' conceded a 2002 New York Times story about the machines’ growing popularity. 'But actual checkout speed tells only part of the story. Self-checkout has a psychological effect: as long as the shopper is taking an active part, it seems to go faster.'
"Perhaps an even larger issue than the problems that self-checkout directly creates is the set of behaviors its presence can enable—from executives, from employees, and from customers. Retail executives, looking for any available corner to cut in order to juice short-term profitability, took self-checkout’s proliferation as a license to trim store staffing to the bone. Many stores are now messier, their shelves go unstocked for longer, and customers have a harder time finding the products they’re looking for or employees to answer their questions. Retail jobs, which have long been low-paying, precarious, and unpleasant, are now even worse. Forget staffing up to the levels required for a good customer experience; in some instances, stores have reportedly had problems staffing their floors to a minimum level of employee safety. Self-checkout is far from solely responsible for this doom loop, but it has contributed to the way certain stores have rotted from the inside."
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/self-checkout-is-a-failed-experiment?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us
#RetailJobs #Technology #HumanConnections -
most customers: *look through menus to find item*
me: *enter item number directly* -
"Walmart quietly rolls out new way to curb theft at self-checkout"
The new way is human undetectable barcodes that machines can easily detect.
Yeah, because nothing can go wrong.
:headache:
[Bleep]
[Bleep]
[Bleep-bleep]
"Shit! The bread was scanned twice. Let me remove it."
[Bleep]
"Fuck! It's picked up the baseball cap I'm wearing."
[Bleep-bleep-bleep-bleep.]
"Bloody hell. It is now picking up my shirt, my pants, my watch, and... for some reason... my briefs!"
#Walmart #theft #enshittification #SelfCheckout
https://www.thestreet.com/retail/walmart-quietly-rolls-out-new-way-to-curb-theft-at-self-checkout
-
"Walmart quietly rolls out new way to curb theft at self-checkout"
The new way is human undetectable barcodes that machines can easily detect.
Yeah, because nothing can go wrong.
:headache:
[Bleep]
[Bleep]
[Bleep-bleep]
"Shit! The bread was scanned twice. Let me remove it."
[Bleep]
"Fuck! It's picked up the baseball cap I'm wearing."
[Bleep-bleep-bleep-bleep.]
"Bloody hell. It is now picking up my shirt, my pants, my watch, and... for some reason... my briefs!"
#Walmart #theft #enshittification #SelfCheckout
https://www.thestreet.com/retail/walmart-quietly-rolls-out-new-way-to-curb-theft-at-self-checkout
-
Fight the power. The code for bananas is 4011. #SelfCheckOut #GroceryStore #Cashier
-
Fight the power. The code for bananas is 4011. #SelfCheckOut #GroceryStore #Cashier
-
Walmart Is Ableist
If you are neurodivergent and prefer to use self-checkout, well, screw you!
Public domain from RawpixelSee, Walmart has been implementing policies about the use of self-checkout. These policies have come to the Walmart where I shop. The self-checkout lanes are now 15 items or less, or they are Scan & Go.
Judging from the articles I’ve found by searching the Internet, I know they are pissing off a lot of people. Do you know who they will piss off the most with this policy change? Neurodivergent people. As such, this change is ableist bullshit peddled by Walmart. Checkout lanes is something that we, neurodivergent folks, discuss amongst ourselves from time to time. Overwhelmingly, neurodivergent folks prefer the self-checkout lanes because it helps us avoid being in a social relation (writ small) with some random cashier.
It is true that some of us do prefer the staffed checkout lanes, but this is a minority of neurodivergent folks. This minority is not directly impacted by the changes I’m detailing here. It may be indirectly impacted by longer waits at the staffed checkout lanes, however.
I discovered the new policy when I went to my local Walmart two weekends ago. I was scanning and bagging my items when I heard an clerk tell another customer that they needed 15 items or less to be able to use the self-checkout line. I was lucky. I think I may have had 14 items in my cart. I looked around and, sure enough, there were signs saying “Scan & Go” and “15 items or less.”
I had used Scan & Go before, but I did not like it. I did not remember why exactly, but this lapse in memory would soon be fixed. The next weekend, I did use the Scan & Go, and I remembered immediately the issues I had with it.
Here is the way I use the Walmart app to shop at Walmart:
- I fill my electronic cart at home. I’m going to call this cart the regular cart, by opposition to the Scan & Go cart that I’m going to discuss below.
- When I’m at the store, I remove the items from my regular cart as I walk down the aisles.
Scan & Go messes this up completely. To use Scan & Go, you need to open up the app and then select Scan & Go mode. When you are in this mode, the items you scan go into a Scan & Go cart that is separate from the regular cart that you can access at home. The items that you put in this cart are not automatically removed from the regular cart, either. You can fix this by manually flipping between the Scan & Go cart and the regular cart, but the app does not make this a seamless operation. You have to go through a bunch of screens to do it.
During my last shopping trip, I had to buy bananas. These need to be weighed. There was a scale near the bananas that, in theory, I could have used, but it did not seem to work. Truth be told, I’m not sure that I wasn’t the problem here. At any rate, I told the app that I’d weigh the bananas later.
I got to the self-checkout and tried weighing my bananas. When prompted, I scanned the self-checkout QR code with my phone, but my phone kept rejecting it. I asked for help, but the clerk was as puzzled as I was. I said that I would just pay for what I had in the Scan & Go cart, and then start a different order for the bananas. Just before trying this, however, I tried one last thing: I told the app that I was ready to pay. It then said that I’d have to weigh my bananas. It presented me with the option to do it at checkout. From this point on, everything worked as expected, but getting there was highly unintuitive.
From what I can tell, the app was confused earlier. It was expecting the QR code of a scale, but I gave it the QR code of a self-checkout machine. It is only after I told it that I wanted to pay now that it gave me the option to weigh at checkout, and that I was finally able to scan the QR code of the self-checkout machine.
Okay, so Scan & Go sucks, but it allowed me to avoid the restriction that Walmart imposed on the self-checkout lanes. It is not ableist, then, right? As if. It is still ableist. You can use Scan & Go only if you pay extra for Walmart+. I pay for it for reasons that I shall not detail in this article. Do you know who has a hard time making ends meet? Neurodivergent people.
I’ve heard about Walmart setting up sensory friendly hours in their stores. I’ve personally never experienced these hours. Still, at the end of the day, these hours mean little if they also force neurodivergent folks to use the staffed checkout lanes.
This is bullshit! Ableist bullshit.
Do note that comments merely telling me to not shop at Walmart will be flagged as spam. Read this piece if needed.
#ableism #AutisticWriters #bullshit #checkout #SelfCheckout #Walmart #YourAutisticLife
https://www.yourautisticlife.com/2024/08/14/walmart-is-ableist/
-
Well, now that it's after 8am (when they open a single cashier lane) on a Tuesday (when they give me a 5% senior discount to partially make up for the at least 30% overcharge), I'm off to do my weekly shopping.
#SelfCheckout -
Well, now that it's after 8am (when they open a single cashier lane) on a Tuesday (when they give me a 5% senior discount to partially make up for the at least 30% overcharge), I'm off to do my weekly shopping.
#SelfCheckout -
What if we had a "No Self-Checkout Week", where we refuse to use the self-checkout lanes or, if no other option, refuse to scan things and wait for one of the 'overseers' to scan everything (or we abandon our carts)? I understand this will involve some inconvenience for shoppers, so I don't have high hopes for it catching on.
#SelfCheckout -
What if we had a "No Self-Checkout Week", where we refuse to use the self-checkout lanes or, if no other option, refuse to scan things and wait for one of the 'overseers' to scan everything (or we abandon our carts)? I understand this will involve some inconvenience for shoppers, so I don't have high hopes for it catching on.
#SelfCheckout -
I don't for a moment believe retailers' claims about theft — they're too similar to the "oh noes, shoplifting is so bad we have to close stores!" lies that recently unraveled. But I absolutely welcome any move to get rid of self-checkout. Those machines are a #UX nightmare. (Also I'm one of the 21% who feels like I'm performing free labor. Maybe because my first job was as a bagger/cashier in a supermarket.)
-
I don't for a moment believe retailers' claims about theft — they're too similar to the "oh noes, shoplifting is so bad we have to close stores!" lies that recently unraveled. But I absolutely welcome any move to get rid of self-checkout. Those machines are a #UX nightmare. (Also I'm one of the 21% who feels like I'm performing free labor. Maybe because my first job was as a bagger/cashier in a supermarket.)
-
#AI chatbots instead of human support, #SelfCheckout and check-in (air travel) etc. #SelfService everything, human-free.
-
#AI chatbots instead of human support, #SelfCheckout and check-in (air travel) etc. #SelfService everything, human-free.
-
Many things will not scan because they have glue, food or a wrinkle on the bar code. I place the failed items in the pass through for the impassive cashier to scan. The line behind me looks impatient.
Then the cat wakes me up.
#Groceries #SelfCheckout -
Many things will not scan because they have glue, food or a wrinkle on the bar code. I place the failed items in the pass through for the impassive cashier to scan. The line behind me looks impatient.
Then the cat wakes me up.
#Groceries #SelfCheckout -
What I love about Aldi is that they put UPC codes freaking EVERYWHERE on their packaging.
We’re gonna make you scan this yourself but we are gonna make it EASY AF to do!
-
What I love about Aldi is that they put UPC codes freaking EVERYWHERE on their packaging.
We’re gonna make you scan this yourself but we are gonna make it EASY AF to do!
-
California bill may get rid of self-checkout lanes at grocers, certain retailers
#Business #California #legislation #retailers #selfcheckout #USnews
https://theaegisalliance.com/2024/05/08/california-bill-may-get-rid-of-self-checkout-lanes/?feed_id=16711&_unique_id=663c0303e14a1 -
@IKEAUSA
@IKEA
@IKEA_Centennial
Loose the #selfcheckout, people detest them - as can be evidenced by the zero queue @ them, but a huge one (!) at the regular checkout #ikea #ikea
-
@IKEAUSA
@IKEA
@IKEA_Centennial
Loose the #selfcheckout, people detest them - as can be evidenced by the zero queue @ them, but a huge one (!) at the regular checkout #ikea #ikea
-
🤦♂️ "No! Please don't throw me in that briar patch, Briar Bear!"
If you despise the "#SelfCheckout lane as much as I do, you've got to be wondering WTF Wal*Mart is thinking here:
"Wal*Mart Wants to Charge You to Use the Self-Checkout." (which means they'll have to open more full service lanes to stop lines from getting too long.)
https://www.outkick.com/culture/walmart-to-start-making-people-pay-extra-to-do-self-service-checkout -
'It hasn't delivered': The spectacular failure of #selfcheckout technology
When self-checkout at stores was rolled out, many people cheered. No longer would they have to wait behind the senior citizen who couldn't remember the PIN for their debit card. No longer would they have to wait in long lines trying to ignore the idle chitchat from fellow shoppers. From now on it would be a breeze to get in and get out without human interaction. Except that hasn't happened.
https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20240111-it-hasnt-delivered-the-spectacular-failure-of-self-checkout-technology -
#SanFrancisco Safeway Removes #SelfCheckout Lanes Due To Consistent Theft Of #Unscanned Items
https://sfstandard.com/2024/01/23/safeway-removes-self-checkout-due-to-theft-plans-to-stay-open/ #ItemInBaggingArea