home.social

#linearregression — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #linearregression, aggregated by home.social.

  1. About metrics for measuring agreement on regression on continuous datasets:
    Reasons to avoid R² and use RMSE instead: feat.engineering/03-Review_of_

    From Max Kuhn @topepo, Kjell Johnson (2026), "Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models"

    #prediction #dataDev #modelEvaluation #regression #modelling #linearRegression #modeling #probability #probabilities #statistics #stats #gotcha

  2. About metrics for measuring agreement on regression on continuous datasets:
    Reasons to avoid R² and use RMSE instead: feat.engineering/03-Review_of_

    From Max Kuhn @topepo, Kjell Johnson (2026), "Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models"

    #prediction #dataDev #modelEvaluation #regression #modelling #linearRegression #modeling #probability #probabilities #statistics #stats #gotcha

  3. About metrics for measuring agreement on regression on continuous datasets:
    Reasons to avoid R² and use RMSE instead: feat.engineering/03-Review_of_

    From Max Kuhn @topepo, Kjell Johnson (2026), "Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models"

  4. About metrics for measuring agreement on regression on continuous datasets:
    Reasons to avoid R² and use RMSE instead: feat.engineering/03-Review_of_

    From Max Kuhn @topepo, Kjell Johnson (2026), "Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models"

    #prediction #dataDev #modelEvaluation #regression #modelling #linearRegression #modeling #probability #probabilities #statistics #stats #gotcha

  5. About metrics for measuring agreement on regression on continuous datasets:
    Reasons to avoid R² and use RMSE instead: feat.engineering/03-Review_of_

    From Max Kuhn @topepo, Kjell Johnson (2026), "Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models"

    #prediction #dataDev #modelEvaluation #regression #modelling #linearRegression #modeling #probability #probabilities #statistics #stats #gotcha

  6. This same idea scales up in modern AI systems:
    learn from data → predict.

    Linear regression isn’t about complexity.
    It’s about building intuition — and realizing you can understand how intelligent systems learn.

    #sameidea #linearregression #intelligentsystems #intelligentsystem #scaleup

  7. Before diving into deep learning hype, remember the power of classic algorithms. Linear regression, decision trees, and thoughtful feature engineering still drive real‑world analytics and revenue. Master these fundamentals and your neural nets will perform better, faster, and cheaper. Curious how the basics outpace the buzz? Read on. #NeuralNetworks #LinearRegression #DecisionTrees #FeatureEngineering

    🔗 aidailypost.com/news/master-fu

  8. Before diving into deep learning hype, remember the power of classic algorithms. Linear regression, decision trees, and thoughtful feature engineering still drive real‑world analytics and revenue. Master these fundamentals and your neural nets will perform better, faster, and cheaper. Curious how the basics outpace the buzz? Read on. #NeuralNetworks #LinearRegression #DecisionTrees #FeatureEngineering

    🔗 aidailypost.com/news/master-fu

  9. Understanding Linear Regression - Although [Vitor Fróis] is explaining linear regression because it relates to machi... - hackaday.com/2025/05/08/unders #linearregression #machinelearning #math

  10. @data @datadon 🧵

    How to assess a statistical model?
    How to choose between variables?

    Pearson's #correlation is irrelevant if you suspect that the relationship is not a straight line.

    If monotonic relationship:
    "#Spearman’s rho is particularly useful for small samples where weak correlations are expected, as it can detect subtle monotonic trends." It is "widespread across disciplines where the measurement precision is not guaranteed".
    "#Kendall’s Tau-b is less affected [than Spearman’s rho] by outliers in the data, making it a robust option for datasets with extreme values."
    Ref: statisticseasily.com/kendall-t

    #normality #normalDistribution #modeling #dataDev #AIDev #ML #modelEvaluation #regression #modelling #dataLearning #featureEngineering #linearRegression #modeling #probability #probabilities #statistics #stats #correctionRatio #ML #Pearson #bias #regressionRedress #distributions

  11. @data @datadon 🧵

    How to assess a statistical model?
    How to choose between variables?

    Pearson's #correlation is irrelevant if you suspect that the relationship is not a straight line.

    If monotonic relationship:
    "#Spearman’s rho is particularly useful for small samples where weak correlations are expected, as it can detect subtle monotonic trends." It is "widespread across disciplines where the measurement precision is not guaranteed".
    "#Kendall’s Tau-b is less affected [than Spearman’s rho] by outliers in the data, making it a robust option for datasets with extreme values."
    Ref: statisticseasily.com/kendall-t

    #normality #normalDistribution #modeling #dataDev #AIDev #ML #modelEvaluation #regression #modelling #dataLearning #featureEngineering #linearRegression #modeling #probability #probabilities #statistics #stats #correctionRatio #ML #Pearson #bias #regressionRedress #distributions

  12. @[email protected] @[email protected] 🧵

    How to assess a statistical model?
    How to choose between variables?

    Pearson's is irrelevant if you suspect that the relationship is not a straight line.

    If monotonic relationship:
    "’s rho is particularly useful for small samples where weak correlations are expected, as it can detect subtle monotonic trends." It is "widespread across disciplines where the measurement precision is not guaranteed".
    "’s Tau-b is less affected [than Spearman’s rho] by outliers in the data, making it a robust option for datasets with extreme values."
    Ref: statisticseasily.com/kendall-t

  13. @data @datadon 🧵

    How to assess a statistical model?
    How to choose between variables?

    Pearson's #correlation is irrelevant if you suspect that the relationship is not a straight line.

    If monotonic relationship:
    "#Spearman’s rho is particularly useful for small samples where weak correlations are expected, as it can detect subtle monotonic trends." It is "widespread across disciplines where the measurement precision is not guaranteed".
    "#Kendall’s Tau-b is less affected [than Spearman’s rho] by outliers in the data, making it a robust option for datasets with extreme values."
    Ref: statisticseasily.com/kendall-t

    #normality #normalDistribution #modeling #dataDev #AIDev #ML #modelEvaluation #regression #modelling #dataLearning #featureEngineering #linearRegression #modeling #probability #probabilities #statistics #stats #correctionRatio #ML #Pearson #bias #regressionRedress #distributions

  14. @data @datadon 🧵

    How to assess a statistical model?
    How to choose between variables?

    Pearson's #correlation is irrelevant if you suspect that the relationship is not a straight line.

    If monotonic relationship:
    "#Spearman’s rho is particularly useful for small samples where weak correlations are expected, as it can detect subtle monotonic trends." It is "widespread across disciplines where the measurement precision is not guaranteed".
    "#Kendall’s Tau-b is less affected [than Spearman’s rho] by outliers in the data, making it a robust option for datasets with extreme values."
    Ref: statisticseasily.com/kendall-t

    #normality #normalDistribution #modeling #dataDev #AIDev #ML #modelEvaluation #regression #modelling #dataLearning #featureEngineering #linearRegression #modeling #probability #probabilities #statistics #stats #correctionRatio #ML #Pearson #bias #regressionRedress #distributions

  15. "In real life, we weigh the anticipated consequences of the decisions that we are about to make. That approach is much more rational than limiting the percentage of making the error of one kind in an artificial (null hypothesis) setting or using a measure of evidence for each model as the weight."
    Longford (2005) stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuf

    #modeling #nullHypothesis #probability #probabilities #pValues #statistics #stats #statisticalLiteracy #bias #inference #modelling #regression #linearRegression

  16. "In real life, we weigh the anticipated consequences of the decisions that we are about to make. That approach is much more rational than limiting the percentage of making the error of one kind in an artificial (null hypothesis) setting or using a measure of evidence for each model as the weight."
    Longford (2005) stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuf

    #modeling #nullHypothesis #probability #probabilities #pValues #statistics #stats #statisticalLiteracy #bias #inference #modelling #regression #linearRegression

  17. "In real life, we weigh the anticipated consequences of the decisions that we are about to make. That approach is much more rational than limiting the percentage of making the error of one kind in an artificial (null hypothesis) setting or using a measure of evidence for each model as the weight."
    Longford (2005) stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuf

  18. "In real life, we weigh the anticipated consequences of the decisions that we are about to make. That approach is much more rational than limiting the percentage of making the error of one kind in an artificial (null hypothesis) setting or using a measure of evidence for each model as the weight."
    Longford (2005) stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuf

    #modeling #nullHypothesis #probability #probabilities #pValues #statistics #stats #statisticalLiteracy #bias #inference #modelling #regression #linearRegression

  19. "In real life, we weigh the anticipated consequences of the decisions that we are about to make. That approach is much more rational than limiting the percentage of making the error of one kind in an artificial (null hypothesis) setting or using a measure of evidence for each model as the weight."
    Longford (2005) stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/stuf

    #modeling #nullHypothesis #probability #probabilities #pValues #statistics #stats #statisticalLiteracy #bias #inference #modelling #regression #linearRegression