home.social

#horowitz — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #horowitz, aggregated by home.social.

  1. ⭕La ville de #Taybeh, à l'Est de #Ramallah, est assiégée par l'expansion des colonies. Des bandes de colons menées par #Ben_Pazi et #Horowitz ont établi un nouveau poste avancé directement adjacent aux maisons #Palestiniennes. #Eye on Palestine

  2. ⭕La ville de #Taybeh, à l'Est de #Ramallah, est assiégée par l'expansion des colonies. Des bandes de colons menées par #Ben_Pazi et #Horowitz ont établi un nouveau poste avancé directement adjacent aux maisons #Palestiniennes. #Eye on Palestine

  3. ⭕La ville de #Taybeh, à l'Est de #Ramallah, est assiégée par l'expansion des colonies. Des bandes de colons menées par #Ben_Pazi et #Horowitz ont établi un nouveau poste avancé directement adjacent aux maisons #Palestiniennes. #Eye on Palestine

  4. Andreessen Horowitz backs AI virtual character in 1st Japan-related bet

    Shizuku is a character developed by Shizuku AI. The company plans to develop the character as an AI…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artificialintelligence #1st #AI #Andreessen #ArtificialIntelligence #backs #bet #character #horowitz #Japan-related #Technology #UK #UnitedKingdom #virtual
    newsbeep.com/uk/417191/

  5. Wird das neue #Tiktok zu #X?

    > [w]enn… #Oracle und Andreessen #Horowitz die Fäden ziehen, könnte sich die Geschichte von #Twitter wiederholen. Einst als Kanal für Austausch zwischen Menschen unterschiedlichster Lager gedacht, versinkt die Plattform nach der Übernahme durch… #Musk in einem Sumpf aus Verschwörungstheorien und ultrarechtem Gedankengut. (…) 2024 skizziert Larry Ellison eine dystopische Version eines Überwachungsstaats, die… China nahekommt.

    18.9.2025 t3n.de/news/usa-tiktok-china-t

  6. Wird das neue #Tiktok zu #X?

    > [w]enn… #Oracle und Andreessen #Horowitz die Fäden ziehen, könnte sich die Geschichte von #Twitter wiederholen. Einst als Kanal für Austausch zwischen Menschen unterschiedlichster Lager gedacht, versinkt die Plattform nach der Übernahme durch… #Musk in einem Sumpf aus Verschwörungstheorien und ultrarechtem Gedankengut. (…) 2024 skizziert Larry Ellison eine dystopische Version eines Überwachungsstaats, die… China nahekommt.

    18.9.2025 t3n.de/news/usa-tiktok-china-t

  7. Wird das neue #Tiktok zu #X?

    > [w]enn… #Oracle und Andreessen #Horowitz die Fäden ziehen, könnte sich die Geschichte von #Twitter wiederholen. Einst als Kanal für Austausch zwischen Menschen unterschiedlichster Lager gedacht, versinkt die Plattform nach der Übernahme durch… #Musk in einem Sumpf aus Verschwörungstheorien und ultrarechtem Gedankengut. (…) 2024 skizziert Larry Ellison eine dystopische Version eines Überwachungsstaats, die… China nahekommt.

    18.9.2025 t3n.de/news/usa-tiktok-china-t

  8. Wird das neue #Tiktok zu #X?

    > [w]enn… #Oracle und Andreessen #Horowitz die Fäden ziehen, könnte sich die Geschichte von #Twitter wiederholen. Einst als Kanal für Austausch zwischen Menschen unterschiedlichster Lager gedacht, versinkt die Plattform nach der Übernahme durch… #Musk in einem Sumpf aus Verschwörungstheorien und ultrarechtem Gedankengut. (…) 2024 skizziert Larry Ellison eine dystopische Version eines Überwachungsstaats, die… China nahekommt.

    18.9.2025 t3n.de/news/usa-tiktok-china-t

  9. Wird das neue #Tiktok zu #X?

    > [w]enn… #Oracle und Andreessen #Horowitz die Fäden ziehen, könnte sich die Geschichte von #Twitter wiederholen. Einst als Kanal für Austausch zwischen Menschen unterschiedlichster Lager gedacht, versinkt die Plattform nach der Übernahme durch… #Musk in einem Sumpf aus Verschwörungstheorien und ultrarechtem Gedankengut. (…) 2024 skizziert Larry Ellison eine dystopische Version eines Überwachungsstaats, die… China nahekommt.

    18.9.2025 t3n.de/news/usa-tiktok-china-t

  10. #Civitai Ban of Real People Content Deals Major Blow to the #Nonconsensual #AI #Porn Ecosystem

    Civitai, an AI model sharing site backed by #Andreessen #Horowitz ( #a16z ) that 404 Media has repeatedly shown is being used to generate nonconsensual adult content, is banning AI models designed to generate the likeness of real people, the site announced Friday.
    #deepfake #privacy

    404media.co/civitai-ban-of-rea

  11. #Civitai Ban of Real People Content Deals Major Blow to the #Nonconsensual #AI #Porn Ecosystem

    Civitai, an AI model sharing site backed by #Andreessen #Horowitz ( #a16z ) that 404 Media has repeatedly shown is being used to generate nonconsensual adult content, is banning AI models designed to generate the likeness of real people, the site announced Friday.
    #deepfake #privacy

    404media.co/civitai-ban-of-rea

  12. #Civitai Ban of Real People Content Deals Major Blow to the #Nonconsensual #AI #Porn Ecosystem

    Civitai, an AI model sharing site backed by #Andreessen #Horowitz ( #a16z ) that 404 Media has repeatedly shown is being used to generate nonconsensual adult content, is banning AI models designed to generate the likeness of real people, the site announced Friday.
    #deepfake #privacy

    404media.co/civitai-ban-of-rea

  13. Ban of Real People Content Deals Major Blow to the Ecosystem

    Civitai, an AI model sharing site backed by ( ) that 404 Media has repeatedly shown is being used to generate nonconsensual adult content, is banning AI models designed to generate the likeness of real people, the site announced Friday.

    404media.co/civitai-ban-of-rea

  14. #Civitai Ban of Real People Content Deals Major Blow to the #Nonconsensual #AI #Porn Ecosystem

    Civitai, an AI model sharing site backed by #Andreessen #Horowitz ( #a16z ) that 404 Media has repeatedly shown is being used to generate nonconsensual adult content, is banning AI models designed to generate the likeness of real people, the site announced Friday.
    #deepfake #privacy

    404media.co/civitai-ban-of-rea

  15. Alexander Scriabin (6 de Janeiro de 1872 – 27 de Abril de 1915), compositor e pianista russo.

    🎶 Vladimir Horowitz toca o Étude Op. 8 No. 12 de Scriabin 🎶

    youtu.be/uz3TqZtAkeQ

    #music #scriabin #horowitz

  16. Alexander Scriabin (6 de Janeiro de 1872 – 27 de Abril de 1915), compositor e pianista russo.

    🎶 Vladimir Horowitz toca o Étude Op. 8 No. 12 de Scriabin 🎶

    youtu.be/uz3TqZtAkeQ

    #music #scriabin #horowitz

  17. Alexander Scriabin (6 de Janeiro de 1872 – 27 de Abril de 1915), compositor e pianista russo.

    🎶 Vladimir Horowitz toca o Étude Op. 8 No. 12 de Scriabin 🎶

    youtu.be/uz3TqZtAkeQ

    #music #scriabin #horowitz

  18. Alexander Scriabin (6 de Janeiro de 1872 – 27 de Abril de 1915), compositor e pianista russo.

    🎶 Vladimir Horowitz toca o Étude Op. 8 No. 12 de Scriabin 🎶

    youtu.be/uz3TqZtAkeQ

    #music #scriabin #horowitz

  19. Alexander Scriabin (6 de Janeiro de 1872 – 27 de Abril de 1915), compositor e pianista russo.

    🎶 Vladimir Horowitz toca o Étude Op. 8 No. 12 de Scriabin 🎶

    youtu.be/uz3TqZtAkeQ

    #music #scriabin #horowitz

  20. @carnage4life

    #TikToSale

    #Horowitz is not unlikely, nicht be LEDs obvious than giving it to #Elmo.
    I could also see #Thiel, but that might be too much spotlight for him...

    What's your guess?

  21. @carnage4life

    #TikToSale

    #Horowitz is not unlikely, nicht be LEDs obvious than giving it to #Elmo.
    I could also see #Thiel, but that might be too much spotlight for him...

    What's your guess?

  22. @carnage4life

    #TikToSale

    #Horowitz is not unlikely, nicht be LEDs obvious than giving it to #Elmo.
    I could also see #Thiel, but that might be too much spotlight for him...

    What's your guess?

  23. @carnage4life

    #TikToSale

    #Horowitz is not unlikely, nicht be LEDs obvious than giving it to #Elmo.
    I could also see #Thiel, but that might be too much spotlight for him...

    What's your guess?

  24. @carnage4life

    #TikToSale

    #Horowitz is not unlikely, nicht be LEDs obvious than giving it to #Elmo.
    I could also see #Thiel, but that might be too much spotlight for him...

    What's your guess?

  25. Mstislav Rostropovitch (Baku, 27 de Março de 1927 — Moscovo, 27 de Abril de 2007), violoncelista e maestro russo.

    🎶 Sergei Rachmaninoff - Cello Sonata Op. 19 🎶 3rd mov., Andante

    Mstislav Rostropovich
    Vladimir Horowitz

    Recorded in concert, May 18, 1976.

    youtu.be/o8J1kc6tp1E

    #music #Rostropovitch #horowitz

  26. @CStamp ok, ending with Cpt. Hastings cosplay...

    Did you know that a lot of screenplays for #ITV #Poirot were written by Anthony #Horowitz? Later on he wrote Moonflower Murders, a novel in a novel, which features a character named Atticus Pund, whom it is impossible not to "read" as Hercules Poirot.

    Actually, everything by Horowitz is a banger after banger.

  27. @CStamp ok, ending with Cpt. Hastings cosplay...

    Did you know that a lot of screenplays for #ITV #Poirot were written by Anthony #Horowitz? Later on he wrote Moonflower Murders, a novel in a novel, which features a character named Atticus Pund, whom it is impossible not to "read" as Hercules Poirot.

    Actually, everything by Horowitz is a banger after banger.

  28. @CStamp ok, ending with Cpt. Hastings cosplay...

    Did you know that a lot of screenplays for #ITV #Poirot were written by Anthony #Horowitz? Later on he wrote Moonflower Murders, a novel in a novel, which features a character named Atticus Pund, whom it is impossible not to "read" as Hercules Poirot.

    Actually, everything by Horowitz is a banger after banger.

  29. @CStamp ok, ending with Cpt. Hastings cosplay...

    Did you know that a lot of screenplays for #ITV #Poirot were written by Anthony #Horowitz? Later on he wrote Moonflower Murders, a novel in a novel, which features a character named Atticus Pund, whom it is impossible not to "read" as Hercules Poirot.

    Actually, everything by Horowitz is a banger after banger.

  30. In September,
    the day after the debate between Harris and Trump,
    I spoke again with the lobbyist #Ed #Rogers.

    “You know, I’m a Trump voter, a Trump donor,” he said,
    “but I think Harris is going to win.”

    Another Republican told me that, after Trump’s poor debate performance,
    he had seen similar hand-wringing from other major donors:

    “Can I stomach giving money to this guy and he keeps blowing it?”

    In at least one notable case,
    Harris managed to regain a major donor who had defected to Trump,
    the Silicon Valley venture capitalist
    #Ben #Horowitz.

    Horowitz and his business partner, #Marc #Andreessen, who are both longtime Democratic givers,
    had stunned the tech world in July by endorsing the ex-President,
    citing, in part, Trump’s newfound support for the crypto industry.

    But, in October, Horowitz announced that he and his wife planned to make a “significant donation” to Harris,
    saying that, though the Biden Administration had been
    “exceptionally destructive on tech policy,”
    he had spoken personally with Harris, a friend from California,
    and was “hopeful” that she would take a different approach.

    “There was no real engagement by the Biden world with the business community,”
    a Democratic donor who has spoken with the Vice-President told me.

    “Harris has been very intentional about engaging.

    She’s saying all the right things.”

    Harris’s success with the moneyed class infuriated Trump.

    “All rich, job creating people, that support Comrade Kamala Harris,” he wrote in a social-media post in September,
    “you are STUPID.”

    A couple of weeks later, he posted the
    false claim that
    Jamie Dimon, the JPMorgan C.E.O., whom Trump had also mused about as a candidate for Treasury Secretary,
    had endorsed him.

    Not only was this untrue, as JPMorgan swiftly announced;

    it turned out that Dimon’s wife had donated more than $200,000 to the Democratic ticket
    and attended a dinner this summer with Harris.

    As if to rebut the doubters,
    Trump appeared in early October at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania,
    the scene of the first assassination attempt against him,
    alongside his wealthiest benefactor, Musk.

    Trump had outsourced much of his campaign’s turnout operation
    —the traditional preserve of the political parties and the candidates
    —to Musk’s America pac.

    Musk, whom the Times called “obsessive, almost manic” in his backing of the ex-President,
    had all but relocated to Pennsylvania to oversee an effort to swing the crucial battleground state.

    In Butler, he leaped around the stage in a black maga hat,
    as the former President grinned with delight.

    If Trump does not win, Musk told the crowd, “this will be the last election.”

    A few days later, Harris’s campaign made a stunning announcement:

    she had raised $1 billion in a matter of weeks,
    the largest sum ever collected for an American politician in such a short amount of time.

    Harris more than doubled Trump’s contributions in September alone.

    Will it matter?

    During the past two decades, the winner of the Presidential election has always been the better funded of the two candidates
    —with the notable exception of Hillary Clinton, in 2016.

    ♦ By Susan B. Glasser
    October 18, 2024

  31. In September,
    the day after the debate between Harris and Trump,
    I spoke again with the lobbyist #Ed #Rogers.

    “You know, I’m a Trump voter, a Trump donor,” he said,
    “but I think Harris is going to win.”

    Another Republican told me that, after Trump’s poor debate performance,
    he had seen similar hand-wringing from other major donors:

    “Can I stomach giving money to this guy and he keeps blowing it?”

    In at least one notable case,
    Harris managed to regain a major donor who had defected to Trump,
    the Silicon Valley venture capitalist
    #Ben #Horowitz.

    Horowitz and his business partner, #Marc #Andreessen, who are both longtime Democratic givers,
    had stunned the tech world in July by endorsing the ex-President,
    citing, in part, Trump’s newfound support for the crypto industry.

    But, in October, Horowitz announced that he and his wife planned to make a “significant donation” to Harris,
    saying that, though the Biden Administration had been
    “exceptionally destructive on tech policy,”
    he had spoken personally with Harris, a friend from California,
    and was “hopeful” that she would take a different approach.

    “There was no real engagement by the Biden world with the business community,”
    a Democratic donor who has spoken with the Vice-President told me.

    “Harris has been very intentional about engaging.

    She’s saying all the right things.”

    Harris’s success with the moneyed class infuriated Trump.

    “All rich, job creating people, that support Comrade Kamala Harris,” he wrote in a social-media post in September,
    “you are STUPID.”

    A couple of weeks later, he posted the
    false claim that
    Jamie Dimon, the JPMorgan C.E.O., whom Trump had also mused about as a candidate for Treasury Secretary,
    had endorsed him.

    Not only was this untrue, as JPMorgan swiftly announced;

    it turned out that Dimon’s wife had donated more than $200,000 to the Democratic ticket
    and attended a dinner this summer with Harris.

    As if to rebut the doubters,
    Trump appeared in early October at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania,
    the scene of the first assassination attempt against him,
    alongside his wealthiest benefactor, Musk.

    Trump had outsourced much of his campaign’s turnout operation
    —the traditional preserve of the political parties and the candidates
    —to Musk’s America pac.

    Musk, whom the Times called “obsessive, almost manic” in his backing of the ex-President,
    had all but relocated to Pennsylvania to oversee an effort to swing the crucial battleground state.

    In Butler, he leaped around the stage in a black maga hat,
    as the former President grinned with delight.

    If Trump does not win, Musk told the crowd, “this will be the last election.”

    A few days later, Harris’s campaign made a stunning announcement:

    she had raised $1 billion in a matter of weeks,
    the largest sum ever collected for an American politician in such a short amount of time.

    Harris more than doubled Trump’s contributions in September alone.

    Will it matter?

    During the past two decades, the winner of the Presidential election has always been the better funded of the two candidates
    —with the notable exception of Hillary Clinton, in 2016.

    ♦ By Susan B. Glasser
    October 18, 2024

  32. In September,
    the day after the debate between Harris and Trump,
    I spoke again with the lobbyist #Ed #Rogers.

    “You know, I’m a Trump voter, a Trump donor,” he said,
    “but I think Harris is going to win.”

    Another Republican told me that, after Trump’s poor debate performance,
    he had seen similar hand-wringing from other major donors:

    “Can I stomach giving money to this guy and he keeps blowing it?”

    In at least one notable case,
    Harris managed to regain a major donor who had defected to Trump,
    the Silicon Valley venture capitalist
    #Ben #Horowitz.

    Horowitz and his business partner, #Marc #Andreessen, who are both longtime Democratic givers,
    had stunned the tech world in July by endorsing the ex-President,
    citing, in part, Trump’s newfound support for the crypto industry.

    But, in October, Horowitz announced that he and his wife planned to make a “significant donation” to Harris,
    saying that, though the Biden Administration had been
    “exceptionally destructive on tech policy,”
    he had spoken personally with Harris, a friend from California,
    and was “hopeful” that she would take a different approach.

    “There was no real engagement by the Biden world with the business community,”
    a Democratic donor who has spoken with the Vice-President told me.

    “Harris has been very intentional about engaging.

    She’s saying all the right things.”

    Harris’s success with the moneyed class infuriated Trump.

    “All rich, job creating people, that support Comrade Kamala Harris,” he wrote in a social-media post in September,
    “you are STUPID.”

    A couple of weeks later, he posted the
    false claim that
    Jamie Dimon, the JPMorgan C.E.O., whom Trump had also mused about as a candidate for Treasury Secretary,
    had endorsed him.

    Not only was this untrue, as JPMorgan swiftly announced;

    it turned out that Dimon’s wife had donated more than $200,000 to the Democratic ticket
    and attended a dinner this summer with Harris.

    As if to rebut the doubters,
    Trump appeared in early October at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania,
    the scene of the first assassination attempt against him,
    alongside his wealthiest benefactor, Musk.

    Trump had outsourced much of his campaign’s turnout operation
    —the traditional preserve of the political parties and the candidates
    —to Musk’s America pac.

    Musk, whom the Times called “obsessive, almost manic” in his backing of the ex-President,
    had all but relocated to Pennsylvania to oversee an effort to swing the crucial battleground state.

    In Butler, he leaped around the stage in a black maga hat,
    as the former President grinned with delight.

    If Trump does not win, Musk told the crowd, “this will be the last election.”

    A few days later, Harris’s campaign made a stunning announcement:

    she had raised $1 billion in a matter of weeks,
    the largest sum ever collected for an American politician in such a short amount of time.

    Harris more than doubled Trump’s contributions in September alone.

    Will it matter?

    During the past two decades, the winner of the Presidential election has always been the better funded of the two candidates
    —with the notable exception of Hillary Clinton, in 2016.

    ♦ By Susan B. Glasser
    October 18, 2024

  33. In September,
    the day after the debate between Harris and Trump,
    I spoke again with the lobbyist #Ed #Rogers.

    “You know, I’m a Trump voter, a Trump donor,” he said,
    “but I think Harris is going to win.”

    Another Republican told me that, after Trump’s poor debate performance,
    he had seen similar hand-wringing from other major donors:

    “Can I stomach giving money to this guy and he keeps blowing it?”

    In at least one notable case,
    Harris managed to regain a major donor who had defected to Trump,
    the Silicon Valley venture capitalist
    #Ben #Horowitz.

    Horowitz and his business partner, #Marc #Andreessen, who are both longtime Democratic givers,
    had stunned the tech world in July by endorsing the ex-President,
    citing, in part, Trump’s newfound support for the crypto industry.

    But, in October, Horowitz announced that he and his wife planned to make a “significant donation” to Harris,
    saying that, though the Biden Administration had been
    “exceptionally destructive on tech policy,”
    he had spoken personally with Harris, a friend from California,
    and was “hopeful” that she would take a different approach.

    “There was no real engagement by the Biden world with the business community,”
    a Democratic donor who has spoken with the Vice-President told me.

    “Harris has been very intentional about engaging.

    She’s saying all the right things.”

    Harris’s success with the moneyed class infuriated Trump.

    “All rich, job creating people, that support Comrade Kamala Harris,” he wrote in a social-media post in September,
    “you are STUPID.”

    A couple of weeks later, he posted the
    false claim that
    Jamie Dimon, the JPMorgan C.E.O., whom Trump had also mused about as a candidate for Treasury Secretary,
    had endorsed him.

    Not only was this untrue, as JPMorgan swiftly announced;

    it turned out that Dimon’s wife had donated more than $200,000 to the Democratic ticket
    and attended a dinner this summer with Harris.

    As if to rebut the doubters,
    Trump appeared in early October at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania,
    the scene of the first assassination attempt against him,
    alongside his wealthiest benefactor, Musk.

    Trump had outsourced much of his campaign’s turnout operation
    —the traditional preserve of the political parties and the candidates
    —to Musk’s America pac.

    Musk, whom the Times called “obsessive, almost manic” in his backing of the ex-President,
    had all but relocated to Pennsylvania to oversee an effort to swing the crucial battleground state.

    In Butler, he leaped around the stage in a black maga hat,
    as the former President grinned with delight.

    If Trump does not win, Musk told the crowd, “this will be the last election.”

    A few days later, Harris’s campaign made a stunning announcement:

    she had raised $1 billion in a matter of weeks,
    the largest sum ever collected for an American politician in such a short amount of time.

    Harris more than doubled Trump’s contributions in September alone.

    Will it matter?

    During the past two decades, the winner of the Presidential election has always been the better funded of the two candidates
    —with the notable exception of Hillary Clinton, in 2016.

    ♦ By Susan B. Glasser
    October 18, 2024

  34. In September,
    the day after the debate between Harris and Trump,
    I spoke again with the lobbyist #Ed #Rogers.

    “You know, I’m a Trump voter, a Trump donor,” he said,
    “but I think Harris is going to win.”

    Another Republican told me that, after Trump’s poor debate performance,
    he had seen similar hand-wringing from other major donors:

    “Can I stomach giving money to this guy and he keeps blowing it?”

    In at least one notable case,
    Harris managed to regain a major donor who had defected to Trump,
    the Silicon Valley venture capitalist
    #Ben #Horowitz.

    Horowitz and his business partner, #Marc #Andreessen, who are both longtime Democratic givers,
    had stunned the tech world in July by endorsing the ex-President,
    citing, in part, Trump’s newfound support for the crypto industry.

    But, in October, Horowitz announced that he and his wife planned to make a “significant donation” to Harris,
    saying that, though the Biden Administration had been
    “exceptionally destructive on tech policy,”
    he had spoken personally with Harris, a friend from California,
    and was “hopeful” that she would take a different approach.

    “There was no real engagement by the Biden world with the business community,”
    a Democratic donor who has spoken with the Vice-President told me.

    “Harris has been very intentional about engaging.

    She’s saying all the right things.”

    Harris’s success with the moneyed class infuriated Trump.

    “All rich, job creating people, that support Comrade Kamala Harris,” he wrote in a social-media post in September,
    “you are STUPID.”

    A couple of weeks later, he posted the
    false claim that
    Jamie Dimon, the JPMorgan C.E.O., whom Trump had also mused about as a candidate for Treasury Secretary,
    had endorsed him.

    Not only was this untrue, as JPMorgan swiftly announced;

    it turned out that Dimon’s wife had donated more than $200,000 to the Democratic ticket
    and attended a dinner this summer with Harris.

    As if to rebut the doubters,
    Trump appeared in early October at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania,
    the scene of the first assassination attempt against him,
    alongside his wealthiest benefactor, Musk.

    Trump had outsourced much of his campaign’s turnout operation
    —the traditional preserve of the political parties and the candidates
    —to Musk’s America pac.

    Musk, whom the Times called “obsessive, almost manic” in his backing of the ex-President,
    had all but relocated to Pennsylvania to oversee an effort to swing the crucial battleground state.

    In Butler, he leaped around the stage in a black maga hat,
    as the former President grinned with delight.

    If Trump does not win, Musk told the crowd, “this will be the last election.”

    A few days later, Harris’s campaign made a stunning announcement:

    she had raised $1 billion in a matter of weeks,
    the largest sum ever collected for an American politician in such a short amount of time.

    Harris more than doubled Trump’s contributions in September alone.

    Will it matter?

    During the past two decades, the winner of the Presidential election has always been the better funded of the two candidates
    —with the notable exception of Hillary Clinton, in 2016.

    ♦ By Susan B. Glasser
    October 18, 2024

  35. VC Ben #Horowitz donates to #HarrisWalz campaign

    Reading between the lines, it is clear that they are only doing it grudgingly, and only after the realization that #KamalaHarris is likely to win #Election2024 — So, why not build bridges instead of burning them down like Marc #Andreesen did by endorsing #Trump?

    The #AndreesenHorowitz partner makes an implicit threat to #Harris#Biden has been destructive to us, and you better DO BETTER on #Crypto 👀

    @KamalaHarrisWin

    axios.com/2024/10/04/ben-horow

  36. VC Ben #Horowitz donates to #HarrisWalz campaign

    Reading between the lines, it is clear that they are only doing it grudgingly, and only after the realization that #KamalaHarris is likely to win #Election2024 — So, why not build bridges instead of burning them down like Marc #Andreesen did by endorsing #Trump?

    The #AndreesenHorowitz partner makes an implicit threat to #Harris#Biden has been destructive to us, and you better DO BETTER on #Crypto 👀

    @KamalaHarrisWin

    axios.com/2024/10/04/ben-horow

  37. VC Ben #Horowitz donates to #HarrisWalz campaign

    Reading between the lines, it is clear that they are only doing it grudgingly, and only after the realization that #KamalaHarris is likely to win #Election2024 — So, why not build bridges instead of burning them down like Marc #Andreesen did by endorsing #Trump?

    The #AndreesenHorowitz partner makes an implicit threat to #Harris#Biden has been destructive to us, and you better DO BETTER on #Crypto 👀

    @KamalaHarrisWin

    axios.com/2024/10/04/ben-horow