home.social

#monopolies — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #monopolies, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The #Enshittification of the American Hamburger
    China blocked Argentinian beef for chloramphenicol, Europe blocked Brazilian beef for food safety reasons, and now Trump is importing it all to the US. But don't expect prices to fall much, the monopoly distributers will pocket the savings.

    Matt Stoler is my favorite blogger.

    thebignewsletter.com/p/monopol

    Read more at: UncensoredNews.US/matt-stoler

    #monopolies #oligopoly #competition #antitrust

  2. The #Enshittification of the American Hamburger
    China blocked Argentinian beef for chloramphenicol, Europe blocked Brazilian beef for food safety reasons, and now Trump is importing it all to the US. But don't expect prices to fall much, the monopoly distributers will pocket the savings.

    Matt Stoler is my favorite blogger.

    thebignewsletter.com/p/monopol

    Read more at: UncensoredNews.US/matt-stoler

    #monopolies #oligopoly #competition #antitrust

  3. The #Enshittification of the American Hamburger
    China blocked Argentinian beef for chloramphenicol, Europe blocked Brazilian beef for food safety reasons, and now Trump is importing it all to the US. But don't expect prices to fall much, the monopoly distributers will pocket the savings.

    Matt Stoler is my favorite blogger.

    thebignewsletter.com/p/monopol

    Read more at: UncensoredNews.US/matt-stoler

    #monopolies #oligopoly #competition #antitrust

  4. The #Enshittification of the American Hamburger
    China blocked Argentinian beef for chloramphenicol, Europe blocked Brazilian beef for food safety reasons, and now Trump is importing it all to the US. But don't expect prices to fall much, the monopoly distributers will pocket the savings.

    Matt Stoler is my favorite blogger.

    thebignewsletter.com/p/monopol

    Read more at: UncensoredNews.US/matt-stoler

    #monopolies #oligopoly #competition #antitrust

  5. The #Enshittification of the American Hamburger
    China blocked Argentinian beef for chloramphenicol, Europe blocked Brazilian beef for food safety reasons, and now Trump is importing it all to the US. But don't expect prices to fall much, the monopoly distributers will pocket the savings.

    Matt Stoler is my favorite blogger.

    thebignewsletter.com/p/monopol

    Read more at: UncensoredNews.US/matt-stoler

    #monopolies #oligopoly #competition #antitrust

  6. The idea that the gross over investment in technology is the solution to all our problems, is delusional on the grandest scale of delusions!

    Also used as an argument to secure its boom is that new technology like Ai and AGi is inevitable and necessary to obtain a competitive advantage.

    What is not much advertised, discussed, challenged and acted on are the current social, environmental, political and economic costs of the deregulated markets responsible for pushing the MAD investments of and in the technology of antitrust monopolies. They continue to undermine the benefits that result from democratic mediation, rights of diverse interests, peace, security, wellbeing and the flourishing that you get with ending the growth in inequality and injustice that their corporate sovereignty profits from! #Philosophy #Technology #ai #AGi #deregulation #Markets #MAD #antitrust #monopolies #corporatesovereignty #Delusions

  7. The idea that the gross over investment in technology is the solution to all our problems, is delusional on the grandest scale of delusions!

    Also used as an argument to secure its boom is that new technology like Ai and AGi is inevitable and necessary to obtain a competitive advantage.

    What is not much advertised, discussed, challenged and acted on are the current social, environmental, political and economic costs of the deregulated markets responsible for pushing the MAD investments of and in the technology of antitrust monopolies. They continue to undermine the benefits that result from democratic mediation, rights of diverse interests, peace, security, wellbeing and the flourishing that you get with ending the growth in inequality and injustice that their corporate sovereignty profits from! #Philosophy #Technology #ai #AGi #deregulation #Markets #MAD #antitrust #monopolies #corporatesovereignty #Delusions

  8. The idea that the gross over investment in technology is the solution to all our problems, is delusional on the grandest scale of delusions!

    Also used as an argument to secure its boom is that new technology like Ai and AGi is inevitable and necessary to obtain a competitive advantage.

    What is not much advertised, discussed, challenged and acted on are the current social, environmental, political and economic costs of the deregulated markets responsible for pushing the MAD investments of and in the technology of antitrust monopolies. They continue to undermine the benefits that result from democratic mediation, rights of diverse interests, peace, security, wellbeing and the flourishing that you get with ending the growth in inequality and injustice that their corporate sovereignty profits from! #Philosophy #Technology #ai #AGi #deregulation #Markets #MAD #antitrust #monopolies #corporatesovereignty #Delusions

  9. The idea that the gross over investment in technology is the solution to all our problems, is delusional on the grandest scale of delusions!

    Also used as an argument to secure its boom is that new technology like Ai and AGi is inevitable and necessary to obtain a competitive advantage.

    What is not much advertised, discussed, challenged and acted on are the current social, environmental, political and economic costs of the deregulated markets responsible for pushing the MAD investments of and in the technology of antitrust monopolies. They continue to undermine the benefits that result from democratic mediation, rights of diverse interests, peace, security, wellbeing and the flourishing that you get with ending the growth in inequality and injustice that their corporate sovereignty profits from! #Philosophy #Technology #ai #AGi #deregulation #Markets #MAD #antitrust #monopolies #corporatesovereignty #Delusions

  10. The idea that the gross over investment in technology is the solution to all our problems, is delusional on the grandest scale of delusions!

    Also used as an argument to secure its boom is that new technology like Ai and AGi is inevitable and necessary to obtain a competitive advantage.

    What is not much advertised, discussed, challenged and acted on are the current social, environmental, political and economic costs of the deregulated markets responsible for pushing the MAD investments of and in the technology of antitrust monopolies. They continue to undermine the benefits that result from democratic mediation, rights of diverse interests, peace, security, wellbeing and the flourishing that you get with ending the growth in inequality and injustice that their corporate sovereignty profits from! #Philosophy #Technology #ai #AGi #deregulation #Markets #MAD #antitrust #monopolies #corporatesovereignty #Delusions

  11. ‘India’s government has intensified its crackdown on monopolistic practices in the tech sector, targeting industry giants such as Apple, Google and Amazon, while also proposing a Digital Competition Bill aimed at curbing foreign dominance and strengthening the domestic market.’

    emerald.com/expert-briefings/a

    Something the US, UK and European courts have failed to do even though 20+ millions of those Nations people died fighting fascists cults in WW2! Antitrust monopolies finance fascist cults in exchange for tax cuts to benefit the ultra wealthy and policies for the hegemonic control of corporate capital. #shameful #monopolies #WW3 #GreedAndPower #MobRule #Philosophy #RightsAbuse #LeadingFromCorruption #Antitrust #CorporateSovereigntyIsEvil #TheRepublicsFederation

  12. @chris @unfa is this still a problem if you run graphene or lineage?

    To any youtuber or play store slave: you are Google's employee, but with no workers rights whatsoever. Google can take away anything and not be accountable.

    #monopolies  #capitalismsucks

  13. The quoted text is the end of Google’s #Ai overview to the OP:

    ‘If you are exploring a specific philosophical paper, book, or argument that ties Hume directly to these geopolitical outcomes, let me know! We can dive deeper into the specific dialectic principles or texts you are examining.’

    but #Ai whether generative or not, is not a ‘me’. Me is self-conscious and #LLMs are not even a framework that can push a template of consciousness. Automated information ground on #IP scraping is just designed to mimic intelligence to control the expropriation of capital! Can it be reconfigured to be in opposition to the antitrust growth in monopolies serving the unsustainable interests in non-renewables? #AiPhilosophy #Antitrust #monopolies #philosophy

  14. Replying to someone else's feed I found this: a short read on how Thomas Edison and his cronies were monopolistic assholes about motion pictures, leading independent film studios to create movie stars and Hollywood.

    #movies #history #monopolies

    cobbles.com/simpp_archive/edis

  15. @sabrinkmann
    #monopolies like the one you mentioned tend to zuck up everything while the #fedi, as I understand it, prefers to #federate and link instead. So, can't an actor provide a clickable, say matrix, handle? Has it to be mandatory? Has it to be a certain protocol? #AP? Or can there be #choice?

    P.S.: auto-discovery via #webfinger / #RFC7033?

  16. @Powerfromspace1 it's called "#Competition instead of #Monopolies", but #Europe has been a little slow to wake up 💤

  17. "Last year, Jenkins published Music Copyright, Creativity, and Culture, an Oxford University Press title that fuses her scholarly and popular work in a generalist textbook on the legal framework for music that will forever change how you think about music. Now, a second edition, with a lengthy section on new music litigation, AI copyright fights, and the issue of uncompensated labor is available as an open access download:

    web.law.duke.edu/cspd/musiccop

    Music Copyright weaves together the economic, cultural, political and artistic history of music, pulling on historic threads ranging from antiquity to medieval Europe to the age of mechanical reproduction to describe changing views of musicians, their audiences, and religious and political leaders on what constituted music, who was allowed to make music, and what music was for. In so doing, she firmly establishes the extremely contingent nature of our present-day norms around music, showing that the "natural" present-day assumptions about who gets paid, who pays, and when payment (or permission) is required are anything but, and are always in flux.

    For obvious reasons, much of Jenkins' text describes these changes in the context of the record, the radio, satellite transmission, P2P file-sharing, and digital sampling (along with a chapter on AI). These examples are liberally illustrated with links to musical excerpts that bring the subject to life (these are presented as hotlinks in the ebook; if you're reading the print edition, you can use the book's companion website:)"

    pluralistic.net/2026/08/17/gre

    #Copyright #Music #IP #Monopolies #Creativity

  18. "If I want to make myself really angry about the enshittified state of the internet, I don’t fume over pages of slop-drenched, spam-drowned Google results; nor about the fake-review garlanded sub-Temu garbage on Amazon. I don’t even rage against Elon Musk’s child porn–choked, bot-infested Twitter.

    No, when I want to get good and apoplectic about the internet, I think about policymakers. Specifically, I think about all the policymakers I’ve met and corresponded with and begged with and pleaded with and raged against in my twenty-five years with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

    These policymakers are the true authors of our misery. It was they who made decisions that had the foreseeable and foreseen outcome of ushering in the enshittocene, this era in which all of our technology is turning into shit. The thing is, we told them exactly what would happen if they made those policy blunders, and they made them anyway, and now they walk among us, disclaiming any responsibility for systematically rigging the game so that the worst people with the worst ideas make the most money.

    It’s as though we used to put down rat poison, and we didn’t have a rat problem, and then these guys told us that we had it all wrong and we didn’t need the rat poison after all. Now, rats are eating our faces off, and these guys refused to accept that their pro-rat policies had anything to do with it. They say we’re living through the Time of the Rat, in which the great forces of history and the iron laws of economics have combined to create rats of unheard-of fecundity. When we point out the rats have bought and shuttered the rat poison factories, they get defiant
    (...)
    For decades, we allowed companies like Google and Facebook and Amazon to violate competition law. We let them buy their major competitors...

    bostonreview.net/articles/what

    #Capitalism #OpenWeb #BigTech #PublicInfrastructures #Antitrust #Monopolies #Oligopolies

  19. Digital sovereignty and the AI narrative

    Cory Doctorow thinks tech executives' story about AI is not an inevitability

    "Bubbles are really evil. They transfer money from everyday savers to insiders who lie about market opportunities. And those everyday savers are just trying to avoid like, being homeless and starving to death in their old age."

    "We have to really be focused on that fine distinction because it is in that distinction that the narrative that drives the investment, that drives the bubble, it's in that, that's where it lives."

    "We live in an environment that is the end stage of 40 years of lax competition enforcement in which cartels, monopolies, and duopolies dominate most sectors of our economy. And they believe correctly that when there are fewer options to shop for, you can lower quality without losing sales because you're the only game in town. And so, in a world of statistical inference tools and monopolies, firing workers and replacing them with software to produce lower quality outputs, is not an unreasonable bet that you could make it work, but there's nothing inevitable about it."

    "If Donald Trump turned off all of our chatbots tomorrow, what would change? Which government ministry would be unable to do his job? Which important firm would go out of business?" >>
    abc.net.au/news/2026-08-08/cor
    #technology #AI #DigitalSovereignty #finance #markets #ToxicAssets #bubble #narrative #DeepSeek #Mastodon #Sovereignty #InternetCultures #monopolies #governance

  20. "If Kagi (a startup with a handful of engineers) can extract useful search results from Google's databases, then Google – a thrice-convicted monopolist that's had its pick of thousands of the top computer scientists from the world's most prestigious universities for a generation – could also do so.

    They just choose not to.

    They're too big to fail. They're too big to jail. They're too big to care.

    Google's AI search isn't a way to fix its broken core product: it's a way to partially remediate the damage Google itself inflicted on the open internet, while imprisoning the web in a walled garden that would make Steve Jobs drool:
    (...)
    It's a deadly combination: Google has committed hundreds of billions to stock buybacks and its AI money-furnace, financed by mass layoffs targeting the people who keep the core services useful. The too-big-to-care company is still the internet's gatekeeper, but half the guards at the gate have been fired and the other half have pulled so much overtime that they keep falling asleep on the job.

    Google has become a scammer's paradise.

    Take Google's "answer box." This is the part of the search results page that tries to answer your query directly, without sending you elsewhere for that info. Back in 2023, Google's Answer Box was taken over by scammers who impersonated airline help desks. When Google's users searched for airlines' toll-free phone numbers, Google directed them to phones that rang in the scammers' boiler room, where they were tricked into giving up their passport info and credit card numbers to boiler-room thieves:"

    pluralistic.net/2026/08/05/abs

    #Google #Search #SearchEngines #AI #AISearch #Scams #AIOverview #BigTech #Monopolies #Antitrust

  21. youtube.com/watch?v=uHkN8DUpn9E

    A deep dive into 'the financials' & concerns about the pending merger of Paramount and Warner. Global Implications for #media, #movies, #monopolies, #politics & #CNN

    > A judge just froze Paramount’s proposed $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery for 14 days. California and 11 other states argue the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger would reduce competition in theatrical films, major blockbusters, and basic cable programming.

    #Ellison #Paramount #Warner #merger

  22. #BigTech #AI #TechBro companies crying to mommy to get the bad companies to stop (maybe) using their models' output for training is now a standard play from the #monopolies and wannabe monopolies.

    If a (Chinese) company gets too good at doing what American companies do, then force an embargo or force a sell. It was the #Meta/#Facebook with #Tiktok play, and now it's the #LLM play.

    If #scraping copyrighted works for training is legal, so is #distillation.

    #Capitalists sure do hate #Capitalism.

  23. "37-39. Please stop seeing every precious and beautiful aspect of life on earth as a commodity to be controlled and exploited for wealth. Now, see, this is a tough one. It’s so tough that I’m giving it three entries. It’s tough because I know you know you fucked up. You’re aware that much of the world has soured on you. You’ve seen a fleet of headlines like “AI Companies Know They Have an Image Problem” and “AI Has a Message Problem.” You’re aware that the loathing people feel for AI is making them look again at the other products you’ve inserted into every corner of their lives and realize with fresh disgust the many, many ways in which those products represent broken promises. They don’t work as they’re supposed to. They make life more frustrating, stressful, competitive, and alienating rather than easier and more connected. You’re using them to spy on your customers, whom you view as vessels of monetizable data more than as people, and whom you hold in increasingly palpable contempt. You see that we see this, and you’re surely hard at work on ways to fix the problem.

    But this is where things get tricky, because I don’t think you want to fix the problem, not really. I think that, to you, “fixing the problem” means fixing the image that conceals the problem. I think you want to keep doing all the same stuff while selling us a better story so that we’ll let you get away with it. And that doesn’t fix anything at all.

    Because the truth is, tech doesn’t have an image problem. It doesn’t have a message problem. It has an intention problem."

    theringer.com/2026/05/28/tech/

    #BigTech #TechIndustry #Capitalism #Monopolies #Oligopolies #PopeLeon

  24. "WeLib describes itself as an “endless library” founded on the principle that “education and literature belong to everyone.” The publishers, however, clearly don’t agree with the library framing, noting libraries can be trusted; pirate sites not.

    “Libraries are trusted institutions that serve the communities that fund them by lending books and other publications they have lawfully acquired. Using this label for WeLib explicitly misleads the public and allows WeLib to hijack the goodwill that libraries enjoy and have legitimately earned.”

    “WeLib is no more than a pirate website that reproduces and distributes works of authorship owned by others to users for a profit, without authorization from or compensation to the copyright owners,” the complaint adds.

    The complaint notes that WeLib’s operators made efforts to keep their identities hidden. However, the site itself quickly became a go-to portal for many book pirates.

    The complaint notes that, by WeLib’s own account, its collection includes 43 million books and 98 million articles. The site reportedly has over 80,000 active monthly users who accessed more than 51.7 million books and downloaded 14.5 million files last month."

    torrentfreak.com/major-publish

    #AnnasArchive #Copyright #IP #Piracy #Monopolies #Rentism #Feudalism

  25. @karlbode.com This is straight up doublespeak. It will just be more media consolidation into the hands of billionaires resulting in high prices, more #monopolies, and far less competition.

  26. RE: masto.deoan.org/@jsonstein/116

    50+ years of deregulation means there is no entity or government agency that can protect us from price gouging. Remember how prices soared during COVID because of supply chain issues? I do.

    And then when the supply chain issues smoothed over and returned to somewhat normal, did the prices coming back down? Nope. Companies now kept prices high because they could.

    #monopolies

  27. 🇨🇦 Canadians were promised the Rogers-Shaw deal would benefit all of us. 3 years in, Rogers is falling short on jobs, 5G, prices, and service.

    💥 Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) has done nothing! Tell Minister Joly to act on what the government promised.

    👉 openmedia.org/CallOutRogers

    @OpenMediaOrg

  28. #Monopolies kill (or price is out of) everything good.

  29. "The world has moved on. Nothing works. Everything costs too much. No one can help. No one knows how to fix anything. The beams were broken by the Crimson King and his economism-crazed minions. The Dark Tower might fall.

    So what consumer advice do I have for people who are angry about this? I don't have any consumer advice, I'm afraid. You can't shop your way out of a monopoly. Once again, shopping is not politics.

    What I have for you is political advice. To restore the beams and beat back entropy again, we need a better system, not more virtuous individuals. If you feel – as I do – that "the world has moved on," then to wrench it back, you will have to join a polity. Support activist groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the digital rights group I've been at for the past 25 years:
    (...)
    Join a union. If there's no union at your jobsite, start a union. If you work in tech, you start this process by talking to techsolidarity.org and the techworkerscoalition.org.
    (...)
    Get involved in party politics. Find a political party whose local organization supports your values (even if the national version of that party sucks) and then work with your fellow grassroots activists to drag or replace the party leaders. Get involved in local politics: if there's one thing Moms For Liberty has taught us, it's that unregarded, seemingly unimportant local offices have enormous potential to change facts on the ground for the people where you live. Those changes don't have to be change for the worse.

    Doing politics is hard. Hell, after all, is other people. It would be great if we could make change by changing ourselves, but that's not how any of this works. The world has moved on, and you can't save it. But together, we can restore the beams and beat back entropy. Hell is other people, but only because other people are so great but it's so hard to figure out how to work together. We can do it, though."

    pluralistic.net/2026/06/11/lap
    #Politics #Oligopolies #Monopolies #Capitalism

  30. Why struggling #Thailand keeps voting for change tt never comes
    "A group of academics published an open letter warning🇹🇭 is approaching “breaking point.” It urged voters to shun #political parties hostile to LT devt, w dismantling #monopolies among its core proposals. The top 5% of cos control >85% of tot revenue across🇹🇭 #economy.. Cos linked 🇹🇭’s #richest men hold outsized influence in #energy, F&B, #retail & #telecommunications, & together acct for nearly ⅕ of #SET index"
    straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/

  31. ...#thepeople have become so addicted to aggressive #consumption and so dependent on the mega monster #monopolies supplying their #addictions that they have forgotten how little they actually need and how much power they already possess within themselves to create what they need for themselves!

    #wakeup now please. these "#machines" keep us embryonic to make us feel weak while feeding off our strenths to #empower only themselves.

    #anticapitalism #anitconsumerism #thematrixisalie

  32. Boot KP out of ALL their #monopolies!

    #KingPower cites economic doldrums while #closing storefronts in 3 #Thai #airports
    "Among te 7 issues was an apparent deviation from te terms of reference in the #contract btw King Power & #AOT due to a #government #policy shift in 2024, #duty reductions for wine, a lack of proactive state measures to bolster confidence for #Chinese #tourists, & a general #downturn in overall #tourism. Admitting to a lack of confidence in persisting"
    bangkokpost.com/business/gener

  33. #CyberSecurity #Monopolies #Microsoft #Windows #CrowdStrike #Monocultures: "CrowdStrike will likely face a wave of lawsuits seeking to hold it responsible for shutting down the world’s computers. It’s easy to blame the company. But there’s a bigger culprit: monoculture. Roughly 73 per cent of desktop computers worldwide run a Microsoft Windows operating system. Because Windows systems are so common, they are a popular target for hackers, who can exploit more computers with a single attack than if they targeted MacOS or Linux systems. As a result, there’s a massive market for software like CrowdStrike’s. Almost 60 per cent of Fortune 500 companies use CrowdStrike, which helps explain why impacts on commercial systems were so profound, even though 8.5m machines is a tiny fraction of the number of computers used worldwide. The reliance on a single operating system and a single threat checker for critical commercial IT systems makes global outages possible. Consequently, computing is profoundly more vulnerable than it needs to be.

    To understand how we got here, it helps to look at an apparently unrelated industry: agriculture."

    prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/t

  34. The payoff from Thiel’s early gamble in Trump is a lesson that has not passed others by.

    As with their other obsession, #crypto, the best time to have invested in Trump was 2016,
    and the second best time is today.

    We already have a word for what we’re watching now:
    it’s #oligarchy.

    And we’ve already seen how this plays out.

    In Putin’s Russia, political and commercial interests are one and the same.

    Thiel is betting
    – again
    – on the same phenomenon in America.

    Betting that he will be first among a new breed of tech bro oligarchs
    – a new super-class of #broligarchs.

    In Trump’s America, there will be hard choices for everyone, including the billionaires. --
    Though it may be less hard for them.

    Vance has said he wants to #deregulate crypto and
    unshackle AI.

    He’s said he’d #dismantle Biden’s attempts to place safeguards around AI development.

    And while he has it in for the #legacy #monopolies of Google and Facebook
    – the platforms that his ideological bedfellows in the “new right” see as part of the “censorship industrial complex” suffocating rightwing speech
    – Silicon Valley is betting on a gloves-off, regulation-free, pro-business #goldrush.

    Another Peter Thiel acolyte was on stage at the Republican National Convention last week,
    electrifying the crowd:
    #Hulk #Hogan.

    Hogan is less well known as one of Thiel’s longterm bets, though in some ways he’s even more instructive than Vance.

    In 2007, the online magazine #Gawker outed Thiel and ran a series of unflattering articles about him.

    It took him years, but he ultimately got his revenge, covertly funding Hulk Hogan to the tune of $10m to sue the publication for invasion of privacy and forcing it into #bankruptcy.

    On stage at the RNC, the wrestler, a permatanned orange, ripped off his shirt for the man who increasingly looks like he’ll be America’s next president.

    Or, if JD Vance, is correct, the man who will prove to be the #Caesar he says America needs.

    A man who he has already urged to fire the nation’s civil servants to
    💥 “replace them with our people”,
    to defy the courts and rule his own way.

    Or, to put this in simple terms:
    to foment a #coup.

    Thiel knows what every investor knows. That a crisis is an opportunity.

    And that if Trump succeeds in tearing up the federal administration,
    there is not only billions to be made in the ensuing market #turmoil but that a new breed of oligarchs,
    close to Caesar’s throne, will be the first to share the spoils.

    And chief among them will be Thiel.

    It’s not a stretch to see how #Palantir, his data-mining company
    – that under the Conservatives got its teeth into the NHS
    – will profile and surveil and target Caesar’s enemies.

    And Thiel’s track record in winning, in successfully betting on the longest of odds, on biding his time, is maybe the most chilling of all the factors in a fortnight that has started to feel like the start of a run on the bank.

    Biden’s debate disaster,
    Trump’s victorious assassination survival,
    and now Silicon Valley’s ascension to the presidential ticket.

    The broligarchs have made their move
    – and the rest of us need to understand exactly what that means.

    #tech #elite #Sandberg #Page #Bezos #Peter #Thiel #tech #bro #Vance #Elon #Musk #Marc #Andreessen #Ben #Horowitz #Winklevoss #Chamath #Palihapitiya #David #Sacks #Palantir #Vance #Mithril #Capital #Narya #Capital

  35. If the #fcc wants to go full #antitrust on #monopolies, I wish they had stared with #intuit, a far more evil company. They even turned #creditkarma into a useless credit card advertising tool that didn’t report someone getting a Discover card in my name. #ripmint

  36. The #InternetArchive #library is being sued by 4 #corporate publishers who want to stop them from lending books.

    Statement: Major Decision on Libraries’ Digital Rights A Step Closer on March 20

    "Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York has set March 20, 2023 as the date for oral arguments in four major publishers’ lawsuit against the Internet Archive’s digital library.

    "The following statement can be attributed to Lia Holland (they/she), Campaigns and Communications Director at Fight for the Future:

    "We’re eagerly awaiting the Internet Archive’s opportunity to have their day in court and speak up for the digital rights and future of all libraries in the US. This suit from major publishers has broad implications for libraries’ abilities to circulate digital books—namely, whether or not they are allowed to own and preserve digital books at all.

    "Currently, major publishers offer no option for libraries to permanently purchase digital books and carry out their traditional role of #preservation. It is just as important to preserve digital books as paper books, given especially the rising popularity of digital books and the fact that many local and #diverse voices are not published in print. We want a future where libraries are free to preserve digital book files and ensure they remain accessible to the public as well unaltered. Instead, libraries are forced to pay high licensing fees that regard patron privacy as a premium feature, and the third-party vendors like Overdrive that offer such licenses are vulnerable to censorship from book banners. Under this regime, publishers act as malicious gatekeepers, preventing the free flow of information and undermining libraries’ ability to serve their patrons.

    "This untenable situation is the direct consequence of shareholder #greed at Big Publishing #monopolies. Libraries owning and preserving books is not the reason that most authors are being paid ever less amid the past few years’ record publishing profits. The publishers’ suit against the Internet Archive’s library must be recognized for what it is: an attack on all libraries, conveniently aimed at a groundbreaking nonprofit that Big Publishing’s highly-paid lobbyists aggressively mischaracterize as a for-profit Big Tech company.

    "With a similar preservationist ethos to the Wayback Machine, another Internet Archive project considered essential infrastructure for our digital lives, the Internet Archive’s library provides access to and preservation of out-of-print, midlist, local, and diverse voices in addition to popular books. In many ways, this initiative is similar to the Brooklyn Public Library’s youth censorship circumvention efforts—but the Internet Archive’s library is accessible to everyone around the world, not just youth in the US. The Internet Archive’s digital books also are used for citations on #Wikipedia, underpinning yet another core digital public good.

    "We hope that on March 20th Judge Koeltl will resoundingly free this robust and beloved institution from the greedy maw of Big Publishing."

    #BigPublishing #Censorship #FairUse #Libraries #Archives #WaybackMachine #Archiving #DigitalWorld #OpenContent #Capitalism #EmpoweringLibraries #FightForTheFuture

    Source: fightforthefuture.org/news/202

  37. The #InternetArchive #library is being sued by 4 #corporate publishers who want to stop them from lending books.

    Statement: Major Decision on Libraries’ Digital Rights A Step Closer on March 20

    "Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York has set March 20, 2023 as the date for oral arguments in four major publishers’ lawsuit against the Internet Archive’s digital library.

    "The following statement can be attributed to Lia Holland (they/she), Campaigns and Communications Director at Fight for the Future:

    "We’re eagerly awaiting the Internet Archive’s opportunity to have their day in court and speak up for the digital rights and future of all libraries in the US. This suit from major publishers has broad implications for libraries’ abilities to circulate digital books—namely, whether or not they are allowed to own and preserve digital books at all.

    "Currently, major publishers offer no option for libraries to permanently purchase digital books and carry out their traditional role of #preservation. It is just as important to preserve digital books as paper books, given especially the rising popularity of digital books and the fact that many local and #diverse voices are not published in print. We want a future where libraries are free to preserve digital book files and ensure they remain accessible to the public as well unaltered. Instead, libraries are forced to pay high licensing fees that regard patron privacy as a premium feature, and the third-party vendors like Overdrive that offer such licenses are vulnerable to censorship from book banners. Under this regime, publishers act as malicious gatekeepers, preventing the free flow of information and undermining libraries’ ability to serve their patrons.

    "This untenable situation is the direct consequence of shareholder #greed at Big Publishing #monopolies. Libraries owning and preserving books is not the reason that most authors are being paid ever less amid the past few years’ record publishing profits. The publishers’ suit against the Internet Archive’s library must be recognized for what it is: an attack on all libraries, conveniently aimed at a groundbreaking nonprofit that Big Publishing’s highly-paid lobbyists aggressively mischaracterize as a for-profit Big Tech company.

    "With a similar preservationist ethos to the Wayback Machine, another Internet Archive project considered essential infrastructure for our digital lives, the Internet Archive’s library provides access to and preservation of out-of-print, midlist, local, and diverse voices in addition to popular books. In many ways, this initiative is similar to the Brooklyn Public Library’s youth censorship circumvention efforts—but the Internet Archive’s library is accessible to everyone around the world, not just youth in the US. The Internet Archive’s digital books also are used for citations on #Wikipedia, underpinning yet another core digital public good.

    "We hope that on March 20th Judge Koeltl will resoundingly free this robust and beloved institution from the greedy maw of Big Publishing."

    #BigPublishing #Censorship #FairUse #Libraries #Archives #WaybackMachine #Archiving #DigitalWorld #OpenContent #Capitalism #EmpoweringLibraries #FightForTheFuture

    Source: fightforthefuture.org/news/202

  38. The #InternetArchive #library is being sued by 4 #corporate publishers who want to stop them from lending books.

    Statement: Major Decision on Libraries’ Digital Rights A Step Closer on March 20

    "Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York has set March 20, 2023 as the date for oral arguments in four major publishers’ lawsuit against the Internet Archive’s digital library.

    "The following statement can be attributed to Lia Holland (they/she), Campaigns and Communications Director at Fight for the Future:

    "We’re eagerly awaiting the Internet Archive’s opportunity to have their day in court and speak up for the digital rights and future of all libraries in the US. This suit from major publishers has broad implications for libraries’ abilities to circulate digital books—namely, whether or not they are allowed to own and preserve digital books at all.

    "Currently, major publishers offer no option for libraries to permanently purchase digital books and carry out their traditional role of #preservation. It is just as important to preserve digital books as paper books, given especially the rising popularity of digital books and the fact that many local and #diverse voices are not published in print. We want a future where libraries are free to preserve digital book files and ensure they remain accessible to the public as well unaltered. Instead, libraries are forced to pay high licensing fees that regard patron privacy as a premium feature, and the third-party vendors like Overdrive that offer such licenses are vulnerable to censorship from book banners. Under this regime, publishers act as malicious gatekeepers, preventing the free flow of information and undermining libraries’ ability to serve their patrons.

    "This untenable situation is the direct consequence of shareholder #greed at Big Publishing #monopolies. Libraries owning and preserving books is not the reason that most authors are being paid ever less amid the past few years’ record publishing profits. The publishers’ suit against the Internet Archive’s library must be recognized for what it is: an attack on all libraries, conveniently aimed at a groundbreaking nonprofit that Big Publishing’s highly-paid lobbyists aggressively mischaracterize as a for-profit Big Tech company.

    "With a similar preservationist ethos to the Wayback Machine, another Internet Archive project considered essential infrastructure for our digital lives, the Internet Archive’s library provides access to and preservation of out-of-print, midlist, local, and diverse voices in addition to popular books. In many ways, this initiative is similar to the Brooklyn Public Library’s youth censorship circumvention efforts—but the Internet Archive’s library is accessible to everyone around the world, not just youth in the US. The Internet Archive’s digital books also are used for citations on #Wikipedia, underpinning yet another core digital public good.

    "We hope that on March 20th Judge Koeltl will resoundingly free this robust and beloved institution from the greedy maw of Big Publishing."

    #BigPublishing #Censorship #FairUse #Libraries #Archives #WaybackMachine #Archiving #DigitalWorld #OpenContent #Capitalism #EmpoweringLibraries #FightForTheFuture

    Source: fightforthefuture.org/news/202

  39. The #InternetArchive #library is being sued by 4 #corporate publishers who want to stop them from lending books.

    Statement: Major Decision on Libraries’ Digital Rights A Step Closer on March 20

    "Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York has set March 20, 2023 as the date for oral arguments in four major publishers’ lawsuit against the Internet Archive’s digital library.

    "The following statement can be attributed to Lia Holland (they/she), Campaigns and Communications Director at Fight for the Future:

    "We’re eagerly awaiting the Internet Archive’s opportunity to have their day in court and speak up for the digital rights and future of all libraries in the US. This suit from major publishers has broad implications for libraries’ abilities to circulate digital books—namely, whether or not they are allowed to own and preserve digital books at all.

    "Currently, major publishers offer no option for libraries to permanently purchase digital books and carry out their traditional role of #preservation. It is just as important to preserve digital books as paper books, given especially the rising popularity of digital books and the fact that many local and #diverse voices are not published in print. We want a future where libraries are free to preserve digital book files and ensure they remain accessible to the public as well unaltered. Instead, libraries are forced to pay high licensing fees that regard patron privacy as a premium feature, and the third-party vendors like Overdrive that offer such licenses are vulnerable to censorship from book banners. Under this regime, publishers act as malicious gatekeepers, preventing the free flow of information and undermining libraries’ ability to serve their patrons.

    "This untenable situation is the direct consequence of shareholder #greed at Big Publishing #monopolies. Libraries owning and preserving books is not the reason that most authors are being paid ever less amid the past few years’ record publishing profits. The publishers’ suit against the Internet Archive’s library must be recognized for what it is: an attack on all libraries, conveniently aimed at a groundbreaking nonprofit that Big Publishing’s highly-paid lobbyists aggressively mischaracterize as a for-profit Big Tech company.

    "With a similar preservationist ethos to the Wayback Machine, another Internet Archive project considered essential infrastructure for our digital lives, the Internet Archive’s library provides access to and preservation of out-of-print, midlist, local, and diverse voices in addition to popular books. In many ways, this initiative is similar to the Brooklyn Public Library’s youth censorship circumvention efforts—but the Internet Archive’s library is accessible to everyone around the world, not just youth in the US. The Internet Archive’s digital books also are used for citations on #Wikipedia, underpinning yet another core digital public good.

    "We hope that on March 20th Judge Koeltl will resoundingly free this robust and beloved institution from the greedy maw of Big Publishing."

    #BigPublishing #Censorship #FairUse #Libraries #Archives #WaybackMachine #Archiving #DigitalWorld #OpenContent #Capitalism #EmpoweringLibraries #FightForTheFuture

    Source: fightforthefuture.org/news/202

  40. The #InternetArchive #library is being sued by 4 #corporate publishers who want to stop them from lending books.

    Statement: Major Decision on Libraries’ Digital Rights A Step Closer on March 20

    "Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York has set March 20, 2023 as the date for oral arguments in four major publishers’ lawsuit against the Internet Archive’s digital library.

    "The following statement can be attributed to Lia Holland (they/she), Campaigns and Communications Director at Fight for the Future:

    "We’re eagerly awaiting the Internet Archive’s opportunity to have their day in court and speak up for the digital rights and future of all libraries in the US. This suit from major publishers has broad implications for libraries’ abilities to circulate digital books—namely, whether or not they are allowed to own and preserve digital books at all.

    "Currently, major publishers offer no option for libraries to permanently purchase digital books and carry out their traditional role of #preservation. It is just as important to preserve digital books as paper books, given especially the rising popularity of digital books and the fact that many local and #diverse voices are not published in print. We want a future where libraries are free to preserve digital book files and ensure they remain accessible to the public as well unaltered. Instead, libraries are forced to pay high licensing fees that regard patron privacy as a premium feature, and the third-party vendors like Overdrive that offer such licenses are vulnerable to censorship from book banners. Under this regime, publishers act as malicious gatekeepers, preventing the free flow of information and undermining libraries’ ability to serve their patrons.

    "This untenable situation is the direct consequence of shareholder #greed at Big Publishing #monopolies. Libraries owning and preserving books is not the reason that most authors are being paid ever less amid the past few years’ record publishing profits. The publishers’ suit against the Internet Archive’s library must be recognized for what it is: an attack on all libraries, conveniently aimed at a groundbreaking nonprofit that Big Publishing’s highly-paid lobbyists aggressively mischaracterize as a for-profit Big Tech company.

    "With a similar preservationist ethos to the Wayback Machine, another Internet Archive project considered essential infrastructure for our digital lives, the Internet Archive’s library provides access to and preservation of out-of-print, midlist, local, and diverse voices in addition to popular books. In many ways, this initiative is similar to the Brooklyn Public Library’s youth censorship circumvention efforts—but the Internet Archive’s library is accessible to everyone around the world, not just youth in the US. The Internet Archive’s digital books also are used for citations on #Wikipedia, underpinning yet another core digital public good.

    "We hope that on March 20th Judge Koeltl will resoundingly free this robust and beloved institution from the greedy maw of Big Publishing."

    #BigPublishing #Censorship #FairUse #Libraries #Archives #WaybackMachine #Archiving #DigitalWorld #OpenContent #Capitalism #EmpoweringLibraries #FightForTheFuture

    Source: fightforthefuture.org/news/202

  41. @witchescauldron
    Its good that you do that. We run various tests ourselves. A lot of kids have no idea what is going on. That's okay because some are only teenagers or early twenties, but some of them can vote so you have to try to instill some sense of responsibility.

    #Keynesianism as a response to #priceStickiness in #classicalLiberalism was a mistake. Breaking up the #monopolies that aggregate immense wealth into few hands would've been better, a bit of that happened, iirc, but maybe more.