#complexsystem — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #complexsystem, aggregated by home.social.
-
HT @manlius for embedded #ComplexityPodcast interview with those two current brave researchers
» #ComplexSystems whose future cannot be fully predicted from past data,
or in sufficient time will deviate from any inductive model you can build from past data.
#RobertRosen & #HowardPattee reserve the term #ComplexSystem only for those systems. « @lmrocha» clear is that a whole repertoire of problems
...
will only be solved using the #SystemsLevel view « @ricard_sole -
HT @manlius for embedded #ComplexityPodcast interview with those two current brave researchers
» #ComplexSystems whose future cannot be fully predicted from past data,
or in sufficient time will deviate from any inductive model you can build from past data.
#RobertRosen & #HowardPattee reserve the term #ComplexSystem only for those systems. « @lmrocha» clear is that a whole repertoire of problems
...
will only be solved using the #SystemsLevel view « @ricard_sole -
HT @manlius for embedded #ComplexityPodcast interview with those two current brave researchers
» #ComplexSystems whose future cannot be fully predicted from past data,
or in sufficient time will deviate from any inductive model you can build from past data.
#RobertRosen & #HowardPattee reserve the term #ComplexSystem only for those systems. « @lmrocha» clear is that a whole repertoire of problems
...
will only be solved using the #SystemsLevel view « @ricard_sole -
HT @manlius for embedded #ComplexityPodcast interview with those two current brave researchers
» #ComplexSystems whose future cannot be fully predicted from past data,
or in sufficient time will deviate from any inductive model you can build from past data.
#RobertRosen & #HowardPattee reserve the term #ComplexSystem only for those systems. « @lmrocha» clear is that a whole repertoire of problems
...
will only be solved using the #SystemsLevel view « @ricard_sole -
HT @manlius for embedded #ComplexityPodcast interview with those two current brave researchers
» #ComplexSystems whose future cannot be fully predicted from past data,
or in sufficient time will deviate from any inductive model you can build from past data.
#RobertRosen & #HowardPattee reserve the term #ComplexSystem only for those systems. « @lmrocha» clear is that a whole repertoire of problems
...
will only be solved using the #SystemsLevel view « @ricard_sole -
#Fieldwork reminds us that we, as human beings, are a small part of the #ComplexSystem that is planet #Earth.
-
A fascinating question to ponder.
-
The next images show a simplification of how we were using #teamcognitiveload and #teamtopologies fundamental team types and interaction modes to enable fast flow of change.
We used the Team-Cognitive-Load-Assessment to understand the team cognitive load in a quarterly basis.
Based on the survey responses, we gather insights that were converted into initiatives with a desired outcome description.
When executed those initiatives, we might reached our desired outcome but we also had undesired consequences.
As any #complexSystem, we cannot say doing X, we will move from point A to B. But we can say, by doing X, we want to be closer to the desired end state.
We need to track the consequences and act on them.
It was painfully hard to gather all the data and have an historic overtime, that's why we started https://teamcognitiveload.com.
We aim to provide a tool based on #teamtopologies and #teamcognitiveload to provide insights to make informed decisions and track the consequences of those initiatives overtime.
Wouldn't be cool to know how your organization evolved overtime and how your decisions helped to enable fast flow of change?
-
@jstogdill …with #ActivityPub being the protocol of choice since 2018. So this feels more like coming into established groups as the newbie rather than being one among all newbies. Also, the focus for one’s interest are on different instances based upon location or technology or field of study or sociological identity or whatever. I haven’t found an #IoT or even #ComplexSystem instance, or #OlympicPennisula one. Even the person who gave us the invite to mastodon.social isn’t active 2/2
-
Hydrologists, #FireScience experts, #ComplexSystem researchers, #MachineLearning scientists, and more make up the #CriticalZone Network's Big Data Cluster.
As a #PrincipalInvestigator on the project #UniversityOfVermont based Julia Perdrial stresses the importance of embracing the ideas of #TeamScience to help make sure all ideas are heard, and all members of the group feel confident bringing their ideas into discussions.
-
They found a rock that fell from space.
This team tracked a #meteorite as it entered our atmosphere and then went and recovered it.
Amazing achievement.
And add another #ComplexSystem at work in the #CriticalZone: alien #dust and other materials interacting with #soil, #water, and plants.
Read about the #CitizenScience that contributed to this find: https://www.vigie-ciel.org/2023/02/15/une-meteorite-normande-issue-de-2023-cx1-retrouvee/
Photo - The victorious research team made up of researchers and passionate amateurs. Credit: FRIPON/Vigie-Ciel
-
A common mistake is believing that knowing the history of a #ComplexSystem is equivalent to knowing how to improve it.
-
This is interesting: periodic spatial pattern formation by reaction-diffusion involving one morphogen.
https://www.cell.com/cell-systems/fulltext/S2405-4712(22)00436-7?utm_source=pocket_mylist
-
Now everyone has an opinion on Musk's escapade with Twitter. Here is a piece from Scientific American.
I prefer not to be a political punter and will wait to see how things unfold. Still, this article is interesting - beyond Twitter & Musk.
It nicely explains the differences between a Complicated System ( eg. Car, spacecraft) and Complex System ( eg Social behavior, living systems).
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/twitter-is-not-rocket-science-its-harder/
-
CW: Stewardship, not sovereignty
"There are no hierarchies in nature other than those imposed by hierarchical modes of human thought, but rather differences merely in function between and within living things."
- Murray Bookchin
Sovereignty is the product of a hierarchal mode of thinking. In the social context, it establishes supreme authority of one individual or group over all others, and in the individual context it fosters an extreme isolationism, and disconnect from the social ecology within which we exist.
There is no meaningful distinction between the individual and their social ecological context. And the complex system that is a social ecology can only be modeled when we include as many component parts and their interactions as possible.
Within the Ethics of Social Ecology, we don't look at the sovereignty of the individual, because that would harm both the individual as a component of a complex system, and the complex system itself. Instead, we look at the concept of Complimentarity.
Complimentarity is the assertion that all entities within a social ecology are deeply interconnected. So deeply, that we can only address their distinction from each other through flawed and reductive modeling. And even this modeling highlights strong dependencies between components and the activities of components.
Within such a paradigm, we cannot approach society, or the individual, using the hierarchical mode of thinking that leads us to the domineering concept of sovereignty.
Instead, we must rely on concepts like interconnected autonomy. Where interconnected autonomy is the freedom of entities within a system to explore and strengthen their connection to all other entities within the complex social ecology. In such a framework, the individual is tasked with maintaining and improving the feedback loops between components of a complex social ecology. The individual is tasked with stewardship.
In contrast to sovereignty, this conception of stewardship place responsibilities before rights. Which is the natural progression. For how can you have rights to that which you have not taken the responsibility of stewarding? Can you have a right to clean water when you do not accept the responsibility of cleaning water? Can you have a right to bodily autonomy if you have not taken the responsibility of maintaining and protecting all bodily autonomy? Can you have a right to life, if you do not engender the responsible respect for life that assures its continued existence and perpetuation?
While sovereignty seeks to impose order, stewardship fosters the strength of the complex social ecological system, allowing rights to emerge from the interaction of the components of the system.
How do you all view sovereignty, and how do you foster stewardship?
#Sovereignty #Stewardship #socialecology #complexSystem #complimentarity
-
CW: Stewardship, not sovereignty
"There are no hierarchies in nature other than those imposed by hierarchical modes of human thought, but rather differences merely in function between and within living things."
- Murray Bookchin
Sovereignty is the product of a hierarchal mode of thinking. In the social context, it establishes supreme authority of one individual or group over all others, and in the individual context it fosters an extreme isolationism, and disconnect from the social ecology within which we exist.
There is no meaningful distinction between the individual and their social ecological context. And the complex system that is a social ecology can only be modeled when we include as many component parts and their interactions as possible.
Within the Ethics of Social Ecology, we don't look at the sovereignty of the individual, because that would harm both the individual as a component of a complex system, and the complex system itself. Instead, we look at the concept of Complimentarity.
Complimentarity is the assertion that all entities within a social ecology are deeply interconnected. So deeply, that we can only address their distinction from each other through flawed and reductive modeling. And even this modeling highlights strong dependencies between components and the activities of components.
Within such a paradigm, we cannot approach society, or the individual, using the hierarchical mode of thinking that leads us to the domineering concept of sovereignty.
Instead, we must rely on concepts like interconnected autonomy. Where interconnected autonomy is the freedom of entities within a system to explore and strengthen their connection to all other entities within the complex social ecology. In such a framework, the individual is tasked with maintaining and improving the feedback loops between components of a complex social ecology. The individual is tasked with stewardship.
In contrast to sovereignty, this conception of stewardship place responsibilities before rights. Which is the natural progression. For how can you have rights to that which you have not taken the responsibility of stewarding? Can you have a right to clean water when you do not accept the responsibility of cleaning water? Can you have a right to bodily autonomy if you have not taken the responsibility of maintaining and protecting all bodily autonomy? Can you have a right to life, if you do not engender the responsible respect for life that assures its continued existence and perpetuation?
While sovereignty seeks to impose order, stewardship fosters the strength of the complex social ecological system, allowing rights to emerge from the interaction of the components of the system.
How do you all view sovereignty, and how do you foster stewardship?
#Sovereignty #Stewardship #socialecology #complexSystem #complimentarity
-
CW: Stewardship, not sovereignty
"There are no hierarchies in nature other than those imposed by hierarchical modes of human thought, but rather differences merely in function between and within living things."
- Murray Bookchin
Sovereignty is the product of a hierarchal mode of thinking. In the social context, it establishes supreme authority of one individual or group over all others, and in the individual context it fosters an extreme isolationism, and disconnect from the social ecology within which we exist.
There is no meaningful distinction between the individual and their social ecological context. And the complex system that is a social ecology can only be modeled when we include as many component parts and their interactions as possible.
Within the Ethics of Social Ecology, we don't look at the sovereignty of the individual, because that would harm both the individual as a component of a complex system, and the complex system itself. Instead, we look at the concept of Complimentarity.
Complimentarity is the assertion that all entities within a social ecology are deeply interconnected. So deeply, that we can only address their distinction from each other through flawed and reductive modeling. And even this modeling highlights strong dependencies between components and the activities of components.
Within such a paradigm, we cannot approach society, or the individual, using the hierarchical mode of thinking that leads us to the domineering concept of sovereignty.
Instead, we must rely on concepts like interconnected autonomy. Where interconnected autonomy is the freedom of entities within a system to explore and strengthen their connection to all other entities within the complex social ecology. In such a framework, the individual is tasked with maintaining and improving the feedback loops between components of a complex social ecology. The individual is tasked with stewardship.
In contrast to sovereignty, this conception of stewardship place responsibilities before rights. Which is the natural progression. For how can you have rights to that which you have not taken the responsibility of stewarding? Can you have a right to clean water when you do not accept the responsibility of cleaning water? Can you have a right to bodily autonomy if you have not taken the responsibility of maintaining and protecting all bodily autonomy? Can you have a right to life, if you do not engender the responsible respect for life that assures its continued existence and perpetuation?
While sovereignty seeks to impose order, stewardship fosters the strength of the complex social ecological system, allowing rights to emerge from the interaction of the components of the system.
How do you all view sovereignty, and how do you foster stewardship?
#Sovereignty #Stewardship #socialecology #complexSystem #complimentarity
-
CW: Stewardship, not sovereignty
"There are no hierarchies in nature other than those imposed by hierarchical modes of human thought, but rather differences merely in function between and within living things."
- Murray Bookchin
Sovereignty is the product of a hierarchal mode of thinking. In the social context, it establishes supreme authority of one individual or group over all others, and in the individual context it fosters an extreme isolationism, and disconnect from the social ecology within which we exist.
There is no meaningful distinction between the individual and their social ecological context. And the complex system that is a social ecology can only be modeled when we include as many component parts and their interactions as possible.
Within the Ethics of Social Ecology, we don't look at the sovereignty of the individual, because that would harm both the individual as a component of a complex system, and the complex system itself. Instead, we look at the concept of Complimentarity.
Complimentarity is the assertion that all entities within a social ecology are deeply interconnected. So deeply, that we can only address their distinction from each other through flawed and reductive modeling. And even this modeling highlights strong dependencies between components and the activities of components.
Within such a paradigm, we cannot approach society, or the individual, using the hierarchical mode of thinking that leads us to the domineering concept of sovereignty.
Instead, we must rely on concepts like interconnected autonomy. Where interconnected autonomy is the freedom of entities within a system to explore and strengthen their connection to all other entities within the complex social ecology. In such a framework, the individual is tasked with maintaining and improving the feedback loops between components of a complex social ecology. The individual is tasked with stewardship.
In contrast to sovereignty, this conception of stewardship place responsibilities before rights. Which is the natural progression. For how can you have rights to that which you have not taken the responsibility of stewarding? Can you have a right to clean water when you do not accept the responsibility of cleaning water? Can you have a right to bodily autonomy if you have not taken the responsibility of maintaining and protecting all bodily autonomy? Can you have a right to life, if you do not engender the responsible respect for life that assures its continued existence and perpetuation?
While sovereignty seeks to impose order, stewardship fosters the strength of the complex social ecological system, allowing rights to emerge from the interaction of the components of the system.
How do you all view sovereignty, and how do you foster stewardship?
#Sovereignty #Stewardship #socialecology #complexSystem #complimentarity
-
CW: Stewardship, not sovereignty
"There are no hierarchies in nature other than those imposed by hierarchical modes of human thought, but rather differences merely in function between and within living things."
- Murray Bookchin
Sovereignty is the product of a hierarchal mode of thinking. In the social context, it establishes supreme authority of one individual or group over all others, and in the individual context it fosters an extreme isolationism, and disconnect from the social ecology within which we exist.
There is no meaningful distinction between the individual and their social ecological context. And the complex system that is a social ecology can only be modeled when we include as many component parts and their interactions as possible.
Within the Ethics of Social Ecology, we don't look at the sovereignty of the individual, because that would harm both the individual as a component of a complex system, and the complex system itself. Instead, we look at the concept of Complimentarity.
Complimentarity is the assertion that all entities within a social ecology are deeply interconnected. So deeply, that we can only address their distinction from each other through flawed and reductive modeling. And even this modeling highlights strong dependencies between components and the activities of components.
Within such a paradigm, we cannot approach society, or the individual, using the hierarchical mode of thinking that leads us to the domineering concept of sovereignty.
Instead, we must rely on concepts like interconnected autonomy. Where interconnected autonomy is the freedom of entities within a system to explore and strengthen their connection to all other entities within the complex social ecology. In such a framework, the individual is tasked with maintaining and improving the feedback loops between components of a complex social ecology. The individual is tasked with stewardship.
In contrast to sovereignty, this conception of stewardship place responsibilities before rights. Which is the natural progression. For how can you have rights to that which you have not taken the responsibility of stewarding? Can you have a right to clean water when you do not accept the responsibility of cleaning water? Can you have a right to bodily autonomy if you have not taken the responsibility of maintaining and protecting all bodily autonomy? Can you have a right to life, if you do not engender the responsible respect for life that assures its continued existence and perpetuation?
While sovereignty seeks to impose order, stewardship fosters the strength of the complex social ecological system, allowing rights to emerge from the interaction of the components of the system.
How do you all view sovereignty, and how do you foster stewardship?
#Sovereignty #Stewardship #socialecology #complexSystem #complimentarity
-
@Hamishcampbell
Its a tiny part of the system but its a #complexSystem. Like all complex systems you cannot remove one thing because the other things depend on it.Agree. The #socialSide is so important to grow. Its like #gardening and #encryption (#Tor/#I2P) is the net to stop the birds from eating and destroying your fruitful #communication.
*wink*
-
@strypey
Yes. It takes time to build up but can be stressed easily. #PublicTransport is an example of a #complexSystem. Any changes should be introduced slowly, especially if the system is functioning well.One turn-off for many was when govt introduced #identityCards, replacing #recyclable magnetic #tickets.