home.social

#teamtopologies — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #teamtopologies, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Organisational Dysfunction of the Day

    Team Topologies, the wrong way round

    Context: Leadership has read Team Topologies. The insights are compelling: stream-aligned teams owning end-to-end delivery, platform teams reducing cognitive load, enabling teams building capability. A reorganisation is planned. Teams are renamed and restructured. The new topology is announced. People find themselves in stream-aligned teams that still wait for approval from the same architects, report to the same managers, and receive priorities from the same product managers who held the backlog before. The platform team is the old infrastructure team with a new name and a mandate to serve internal customers, though nobody agreed on what that means. The enabling team runs workshops that nobody has time to attend. Six months in, the cognitive load has not decreased. Delivery has not improved. Leadership concludes that the teams need to embrace the new model more fully. Another round of communication is planned, and product coaches are hired en masse to fix people.

    OST explains: Team Topologies describes structural patterns that emerge from healthy organisations. Like DORA, it is a map of what good looks like, not a recipe for getting there. The patterns only function as intended when the teams operating them are genuinely self-managing, owning their work, coordinating among themselves, and making decisions without constant escalation. Imposing the topology from above while leaving the underlying design principle unchanged is a bureaucratic (DP1) move applied to a self-managing (DP2) framework. Stream-aligned teams become delivery units with a new name. Platform teams become service departments, and their internal customer model quietly recreates the same dependency it was meant to dissolve. Goodhart's law applies here as much as it does to DORA: the moment the topology becomes a target, it stops being a good topology. The book is right. The reorganisation missed the point.

    #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #TeamTopologies

  2. Organisational Dysfunction of the Day

    Team Topologies, the wrong way round

    Context: Leadership has read Team Topologies. The insights are compelling: stream-aligned teams owning end-to-end delivery, platform teams reducing cognitive load, enabling teams building capability. A reorganisation is planned. Teams are renamed and restructured. The new topology is announced. People find themselves in stream-aligned teams that still wait for approval from the same architects, report to the same managers, and receive priorities from the same product managers who held the backlog before. The platform team is the old infrastructure team with a new name and a mandate to serve internal customers, though nobody agreed on what that means. The enabling team runs workshops that nobody has time to attend. Six months in, the cognitive load has not decreased. Delivery has not improved. Leadership concludes that the teams need to embrace the new model more fully. Another round of communication is planned, and product coaches are hired en masse to fix people.

    OST explains: Team Topologies describes structural patterns that emerge from healthy organisations. Like DORA, it is a map of what good looks like, not a recipe for getting there. The patterns only function as intended when the teams operating them are genuinely self-managing, owning their work, coordinating among themselves, and making decisions without constant escalation. Imposing the topology from above while leaving the underlying design principle unchanged is a bureaucratic (DP1) move applied to a self-managing (DP2) framework. Stream-aligned teams become delivery units with a new name. Platform teams become service departments, and their internal customer model quietly recreates the same dependency it was meant to dissolve. Goodhart's law applies here as much as it does to DORA: the moment the topology becomes a target, it stops being a good topology. The book is right. The reorganisation missed the point.

    #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #TeamTopologies

  3. Organisational Dysfunction of the Day

    Team Topologies, the wrong way round

    Context: Leadership has read Team Topologies. The insights are compelling: stream-aligned teams owning end-to-end delivery, platform teams reducing cognitive load, enabling teams building capability. A reorganisation is planned. Teams are renamed and restructured. The new topology is announced. People find themselves in stream-aligned teams that still wait for approval from the same architects, report to the same managers, and receive priorities from the same product managers who held the backlog before. The platform team is the old infrastructure team with a new name and a mandate to serve internal customers, though nobody agreed on what that means. The enabling team runs workshops that nobody has time to attend. Six months in, the cognitive load has not decreased. Delivery has not improved. Leadership concludes that the teams need to embrace the new model more fully. Another round of communication is planned, and product coaches are hired en masse to fix people.

    OST explains: Team Topologies describes structural patterns that emerge from healthy organisations. Like DORA, it is a map of what good looks like, not a recipe for getting there. The patterns only function as intended when the teams operating them are genuinely self-managing, owning their work, coordinating among themselves, and making decisions without constant escalation. Imposing the topology from above while leaving the underlying design principle unchanged is a bureaucratic (DP1) move applied to a self-managing (DP2) framework. Stream-aligned teams become delivery units with a new name. Platform teams become service departments, and their internal customer model quietly recreates the same dependency it was meant to dissolve. Goodhart's law applies here as much as it does to DORA: the moment the topology becomes a target, it stops being a good topology. The book is right. The reorganisation missed the point.

  4. Organisational Dysfunction of the Day

    Team Topologies, the wrong way round

    Context: Leadership has read Team Topologies. The insights are compelling: stream-aligned teams owning end-to-end delivery, platform teams reducing cognitive load, enabling teams building capability. A reorganisation is planned. Teams are renamed and restructured. The new topology is announced. People find themselves in stream-aligned teams that still wait for approval from the same architects, report to the same managers, and receive priorities from the same product managers who held the backlog before. The platform team is the old infrastructure team with a new name and a mandate to serve internal customers, though nobody agreed on what that means. The enabling team runs workshops that nobody has time to attend. Six months in, the cognitive load has not decreased. Delivery has not improved. Leadership concludes that the teams need to embrace the new model more fully. Another round of communication is planned, and product coaches are hired en masse to fix people.

    OST explains: Team Topologies describes structural patterns that emerge from healthy organisations. Like DORA, it is a map of what good looks like, not a recipe for getting there. The patterns only function as intended when the teams operating them are genuinely self-managing, owning their work, coordinating among themselves, and making decisions without constant escalation. Imposing the topology from above while leaving the underlying design principle unchanged is a bureaucratic (DP1) move applied to a self-managing (DP2) framework. Stream-aligned teams become delivery units with a new name. Platform teams become service departments, and their internal customer model quietly recreates the same dependency it was meant to dissolve. Goodhart's law applies here as much as it does to DORA: the moment the topology becomes a target, it stops being a good topology. The book is right. The reorganisation missed the point.

    #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #TeamTopologies

  5. Organisational Dysfunction of the Day

    Team Topologies, the wrong way round

    Context: Leadership has read Team Topologies. The insights are compelling: stream-aligned teams owning end-to-end delivery, platform teams reducing cognitive load, enabling teams building capability. A reorganisation is planned. Teams are renamed and restructured. The new topology is announced. People find themselves in stream-aligned teams that still wait for approval from the same architects, report to the same managers, and receive priorities from the same product managers who held the backlog before. The platform team is the old infrastructure team with a new name and a mandate to serve internal customers, though nobody agreed on what that means. The enabling team runs workshops that nobody has time to attend. Six months in, the cognitive load has not decreased. Delivery has not improved. Leadership concludes that the teams need to embrace the new model more fully. Another round of communication is planned, and product coaches are hired en masse to fix people.

    OST explains: Team Topologies describes structural patterns that emerge from healthy organisations. Like DORA, it is a map of what good looks like, not a recipe for getting there. The patterns only function as intended when the teams operating them are genuinely self-managing, owning their work, coordinating among themselves, and making decisions without constant escalation. Imposing the topology from above while leaving the underlying design principle unchanged is a bureaucratic (DP1) move applied to a self-managing (DP2) framework. Stream-aligned teams become delivery units with a new name. Platform teams become service departments, and their internal customer model quietly recreates the same dependency it was meant to dissolve. Goodhart's law applies here as much as it does to DORA: the moment the topology becomes a target, it stops being a good topology. The book is right. The reorganisation missed the point.

    #OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #TeamTopologies

  6. Zsófia Herendi and I will be running a hands-on lab at DDD Europe in Antwerp on June 12.

    The premise: you can't design teams without understanding how the business creates value.

    We'll connect Business Model Canvas to Team Interaction Modeling. Practical heuristics. Real design work.

    This is not a slideshow. A lab where you will share insights with others!

    🌐 2026.dddeurope.com/program/fro

    #DDDEurope #TeamTopologies #DomainDrivenDesign

  7. Zsófia Herendi and I will be running a hands-on lab at DDD Europe in Antwerp on June 12.

    The premise: you can't design teams without understanding how the business creates value.

    We'll connect Business Model Canvas to Team Interaction Modeling. Practical heuristics. Real design work.

    This is not a slideshow. A lab where you will share insights with others!

    🌐 2026.dddeurope.com/program/fro

    #DDDEurope #TeamTopologies #DomainDrivenDesign

  8. Zsófia Herendi and I will be running a hands-on lab at DDD Europe in Antwerp on June 12.

    The premise: you can't design teams without understanding how the business creates value.

    We'll connect Business Model Canvas to Team Interaction Modeling. Practical heuristics. Real design work.

    This is not a slideshow. A lab where you will share insights with others!

    🌐 2026.dddeurope.com/program/fro

    #DDDEurope #TeamTopologies #DomainDrivenDesign

  9. Zsófia Herendi and I will be running a hands-on lab at DDD Europe in Antwerp on June 12.

    The premise: you can't design teams without understanding how the business creates value.

    We'll connect Business Model Canvas to Team Interaction Modeling. Practical heuristics. Real design work.

    This is not a slideshow. A lab where you will share insights with others!

    🌐 2026.dddeurope.com/program/fro

    #DDDEurope #TeamTopologies #DomainDrivenDesign

  10. Zsófia Herendi and I will be running a hands-on lab at DDD Europe in Antwerp on June 12.

    The premise: you can't design teams without understanding how the business creates value.

    We'll connect Business Model Canvas to Team Interaction Modeling. Practical heuristics. Real design work.

    This is not a slideshow. A lab where you will share insights with others!

    🌐 2026.dddeurope.com/program/fro

    #DDDEurope #TeamTopologies #DomainDrivenDesign

  11. Considerations on cognitive load and organisational structure in sociotechnical systems.
    A blog by Martijn Ras

    In this article we present our rule of thumb for the sizing of solutions based on what an organisation can handle. Our primary goal is to make you aware of cognitive load theory and sociological considerations on organisational structure. Be...

    #dev #softwaredevelopment #TeamTopologies #Cognitiveload #Sociotechnicalsystems #Domain-drivendesign #Agilescaling

    jdriven.com/blog/2026/04/sizin

  12. Considerations on cognitive load and organisational structure in sociotechnical systems.
    A blog by Martijn Ras

    In this article we present our rule of thumb for the sizing of solutions based on what an organisation can handle. Our primary goal is to make you aware of cognitive load theory and sociological considerations on organisational structure. Be...

    #dev #softwaredevelopment #TeamTopologies #Cognitiveload #Sociotechnicalsystems #Domain-drivendesign #Agilescaling

    jdriven.com/blog/2026/04/sizin

  13. Considerations on cognitive load and organisational structure in sociotechnical systems.
    A blog by Martijn Ras

    In this article we present our rule of thumb for the sizing of solutions based on what an organisation can handle. Our primary goal is to make you aware of cognitive load theory and sociological considerations on organisational structure. Be...

    #dev #softwaredevelopment #TeamTopologies #Cognitiveload #Sociotechnicalsystems #Domain-drivendesign #Agilescaling

    jdriven.com/blog/2026/04/sizin

  14. Considerations on cognitive load and organisational structure in sociotechnical systems.
    A blog by Martijn Ras

    In this article we present our rule of thumb for the sizing of solutions based on what an organisation can handle. Our primary goal is to make you aware of cognitive load theory and sociological considerations on organisational structure. Be...

    #dev #softwaredevelopment #TeamTopologies #Cognitiveload #Sociotechnicalsystems #Domain-drivendesign #Agilescaling

    jdriven.com/blog/2026/04/sizin

  15. Considerations on cognitive load and organisational structure in sociotechnical systems.
    A blog by Martijn Ras

    In this article we present our rule of thumb for the sizing of solutions based on what an organisation can handle. Our primary goal is to make you aware of cognitive load theory and sociological considerations on organisational structure. Be...

    #dev #softwaredevelopment #TeamTopologies #Cognitiveload #Sociotechnicalsystems #Domain-drivendesign #Agilescaling

    jdriven.com/blog/2026/04/sizin

  16. You can't design teams and software without understanding how value flows through the business.

    My new case study: an e-learning SaaS company used DDD principles and practices to move from a Big Ball of Mud to domain-oriented teams.

    The customer onboarding went from 60 days to 20 minutes. Cloud costs dropped 80%.

    But the story doesn't end here. Read the full case study: joaorosa.consulting/services/o

    #DomainDrivenDesign #TeamTopologies #OrgDesign

  17. You can't design teams and software without understanding how value flows through the business.

    My new case study: an e-learning SaaS company used DDD principles and practices to move from a Big Ball of Mud to domain-oriented teams.

    The customer onboarding went from 60 days to 20 minutes. Cloud costs dropped 80%.

    But the story doesn't end here. Read the full case study: joaorosa.consulting/services/o

    #DomainDrivenDesign #TeamTopologies #OrgDesign

  18. You can't design teams and software without understanding how value flows through the business.

    My new case study: an e-learning SaaS company used DDD principles and practices to move from a Big Ball of Mud to domain-oriented teams.

    The customer onboarding went from 60 days to 20 minutes. Cloud costs dropped 80%.

    But the story doesn't end here. Read the full case study: joaorosa.consulting/services/o

    #DomainDrivenDesign #TeamTopologies #OrgDesign

  19. You can't design teams and software without understanding how value flows through the business.

    My new case study: an e-learning SaaS company used DDD principles and practices to move from a Big Ball of Mud to domain-oriented teams.

    The customer onboarding went from 60 days to 20 minutes. Cloud costs dropped 80%.

    But the story doesn't end here. Read the full case study: joaorosa.consulting/services/o

    #DomainDrivenDesign #TeamTopologies #OrgDesign

  20. You can't design teams and software without understanding how value flows through the business.

    My new case study: an e-learning SaaS company used DDD principles and practices to move from a Big Ball of Mud to domain-oriented teams.

    The customer onboarding went from 60 days to 20 minutes. Cloud costs dropped 80%.

    But the story doesn't end here. Read the full case study: joaorosa.consulting/services/o

    #DomainDrivenDesign #TeamTopologies #OrgDesign

  21. This is just one lesson in a broader course on modern ways of working — covering how teams can move faster, deliver better, and reduce friction that holds progress back.

    ▶️ Check out the full course on the Team Topologies Academy: bit.ly/41HqZ9t

    #TeamTopologies #ProductDevelopment #DevOps #ModernWaysOfWorking

  22. This is just one lesson in a broader course on modern ways of working — covering how teams can move faster, deliver better, and reduce friction that holds progress back.

    ▶️ Check out the full course on the Team Topologies Academy: bit.ly/41HqZ9t

    #TeamTopologies #ProductDevelopment #DevOps #ModernWaysOfWorking

  23. This is just one lesson in a broader course on modern ways of working — covering how teams can move faster, deliver better, and reduce friction that holds progress back.

    ▶️ Check out the full course on the Team Topologies Academy: bit.ly/41HqZ9t

    #TeamTopologies #ProductDevelopment #DevOps #ModernWaysOfWorking

  24. This is just one lesson in a broader course on modern ways of working — covering how teams can move faster, deliver better, and reduce friction that holds progress back.

    ▶️ Check out the full course on the Team Topologies Academy: bit.ly/41HqZ9t

    #TeamTopologies #ProductDevelopment #DevOps #ModernWaysOfWorking

  25. This is just one lesson in a broader course on modern ways of working — covering how teams can move faster, deliver better, and reduce friction that holds progress back.

    ▶️ Check out the full course on the Team Topologies Academy: bit.ly/41HqZ9t

    #TeamTopologies #ProductDevelopment #DevOps #ModernWaysOfWorking

  26. Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later.

    We've known this since Fred Brooks wrote it in 1975—the opening sentence is a direct quote. Yet many projects still try to add people to meet deadlines, and it fails.

    Even skilled developers need ramp-up time, during which they reduce the team's productivity.

    I wrote about why this happens and what actually works: factor10.com/news/why-is-it-so

    #Development #SoftwareDevelopment #Productivity #Automation #TeamTopologies #DevOps #CI

  27. Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later.

    We've known this since Fred Brooks wrote it in 1975—the opening sentence is a direct quote. Yet many projects still try to add people to meet deadlines, and it fails.

    Even skilled developers need ramp-up time, during which they reduce the team's productivity.

    I wrote about why this happens and what actually works: factor10.com/news/why-is-it-so

    #Development #SoftwareDevelopment #Productivity #Automation #TeamTopologies #DevOps #CI

  28. Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later.

    We've known this since Fred Brooks wrote it in 1975—the opening sentence is a direct quote. Yet many projects still try to add people to meet deadlines, and it fails.

    Even skilled developers need ramp-up time, during which they reduce the team's productivity.

    I wrote about why this happens and what actually works: factor10.com/news/why-is-it-so

    #Development #SoftwareDevelopment #Productivity #Automation #TeamTopologies #DevOps #CI

  29. Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later.

    We've known this since Fred Brooks wrote it in 1975—the opening sentence is a direct quote. Yet many projects still try to add people to meet deadlines, and it fails.

    Even skilled developers need ramp-up time, during which they reduce the team's productivity.

    I wrote about why this happens and what actually works: factor10.com/news/why-is-it-so

    #Development #SoftwareDevelopment #Productivity #Automation #TeamTopologies #DevOps #CI

  30. Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later.

    We've known this since Fred Brooks wrote it in 1975—the opening sentence is a direct quote. Yet many projects still try to add people to meet deadlines, and it fails.

    Even skilled developers need ramp-up time, during which they reduce the team's productivity.

    I wrote about why this happens and what actually works: factor10.com/news/why-is-it-so

    #Development #SoftwareDevelopment #Productivity #Automation #TeamTopologies #DevOps #CI

  31. Discover more with our 3-hour, self-paced "Team Topologies Distilled" course by Manuel Pais and Matthew Skelton on the #TeamTopologies Academy. Don’t forget to take advantage of the Easter offer - get 20% off with code “easter2026” (valid until April 14): bit.ly/3glIZxR

    You can check our collection of courses and bundles here: bit.ly/3ACEdVW

  32. Discover more with our 3-hour, self-paced "Team Topologies Distilled" course by Manuel Pais and Matthew Skelton on the #TeamTopologies Academy. Don’t forget to take advantage of the Easter offer - get 20% off with code “easter2026” (valid until April 14): bit.ly/3glIZxR

    You can check our collection of courses and bundles here: bit.ly/3ACEdVW

  33. Discover more with our 3-hour, self-paced "Team Topologies Distilled" course by Manuel Pais and Matthew Skelton on the #TeamTopologies Academy. Don’t forget to take advantage of the Easter offer - get 20% off with code “easter2026” (valid until April 14): bit.ly/3glIZxR

    You can check our collection of courses and bundles here: bit.ly/3ACEdVW

  34. Discover more with our 3-hour, self-paced "Team Topologies Distilled" course by Manuel Pais and Matthew Skelton on the #TeamTopologies Academy. Don’t forget to take advantage of the Easter offer - get 20% off with code “easter2026” (valid until April 14): bit.ly/3glIZxR

    You can check our collection of courses and bundles here: bit.ly/3ACEdVW

  35. Discover more with our 3-hour, self-paced "Team Topologies Distilled" course by Manuel Pais and Matthew Skelton on the #TeamTopologies Academy. Don’t forget to take advantage of the Easter offer - get 20% off with code “easter2026” (valid until April 14): bit.ly/3glIZxR

    You can check our collection of courses and bundles here: bit.ly/3ACEdVW