home.social

Search

1000 results for “pat”

  1. ¡Tenemos rivales y abrimos la temporada en Seattle! 🔥

    El análisis de nuestro calendario 2026 en colaboración con nuestros amigos de @[email protected] y @[email protected]. 👏✍️

    Velo ya aquí ➡️ bit.ly/4eRH2J3

    #PatriotsEspañol

  2. ¡Tenemos rivales y abrimos la temporada en Seattle! 🔥

    El análisis de nuestro calendario 2026 en colaboración con nuestros amigos de @[email protected] y @[email protected]. 👏✍️

    Velo ya aquí ➡️ bit.ly/4eRH2J3

    #PatriotsEspañol

  3. Hey, Mastodonians! I want to check out how you’re using #Patreon.

    Hit me with your links!

  4. I changed my display name to the first name I actually use, as I continue with #GenderQuest.

    Convenient, what with "Pat" being pretty much the most androgynous name in the white English-speaking world (SNL!).

    I don't know what my pronouns will end up at, and most people I interact with here seldom use third-person #pronouns for me anyway, but I'm putting it up for exploring.

  5. I changed my display name to the first name I actually use, as I continue with #GenderQuest.

    Convenient, what with "Pat" being pretty much the most androgynous name in the white English-speaking world (SNL!).

    I don't know what my pronouns will end up at, and most people I interact with here seldom use third-person #pronouns for me anyway, but I'm putting it up for exploring.

  6. I changed my display name to the first name I actually use, as I continue with #GenderQuest.

    Convenient, what with "Pat" being pretty much the most androgynous name in the white English-speaking world (SNL!).

    I don't know what my pronouns will end up at, and most people I interact with here seldom use third-person #pronouns for me anyway, but I'm putting it up for exploring.

  7. Atlassian security advisory AV26-483 — another patch cycle, another reason to keep your Confluence/Jira instances up to date. Atlassian products have a well-documented history of high-severity CVEs being exploited quickly after disclosure. Patch windows are short when threat actors read changelogs too. #infosec #CVE #patchmanagement
    malware.news/t/atlassian-secur

  8. RE: mastodon.social/@patrickmfsd/1

    I’m looking for a few more beta testers for Readtivity before launch — a reading activity tracker focused on goals, stats, and building better reading habits

    #iosdev #indiedev #books

  9. The INTERNET PASSPORT Will Advance Civilization, Promote Democracy, Reduce Censorship, Save The Children And Fight Crime. What is There Not To Like?


    The INTERNET PASSPORT would enable to control the age and granular exposure of children to the INTERNET. Presumably, the more than doubling of the suicide rate of girls is related directly to WRONGFUL INTERNET EXPOSURE. Not acting on the Internet Passport would be tantamount to complicity in the abuse and deaths of millions of girls.

    If one enters a country, one is required by the authorities to produce a document called a PASSPORT informing them of our identity. Otherwise NO entry. The controls are stiffer if a child is involved, as they should: child trafficking is as old as humanity (and was outlawed by Queen Bathilde in 657 CE). So why not the same sort of control when entering the Internet?

    A huge problem with the Internet has been too much access by children and access to age inappropriate content. Another bad problem has been the usage of the Internet by Organized Crime.

    A simple way to prevent ILLEGAL INTERNET USAGE is to deliver INTERNET PASSPORTS. A law passed worldwide  would be impossible to access the Internet without an INTERNET PASSPORT  The passports would have a degree of security and control comparable to that of a passport to pass physical ports. I am sure China would have to approve.

    Organized Crime, which profits from adopting the latest Internet tech faster than anybody else, will protest (and some politicians on its payroll will listen). It may be objected by individuals who claim to be good citizens, that the instauration of an INTERNET PASSPORT would introduce a worldwide police state. On a personal basis, I am very much against police states… If the policing goes beyond the law enforcement necessary and sufficient to make sure the constitutional laws are respected. But only then. I firmly believe that a substantial population is kept in check only through the knowledge of potentially efficient police action (I have been a victim of serious crimes more than a few times).

    To make sure that the INTERNET PASSPORT does not bring a non constitutional dictatorship, PARRHEISIA and ISEGORIA which should be META CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES ought to be enforced by arsenals of laws

    Parrheisa and Isegoria basically ensure FREEDOM and EQUALITY of speech, not just by allowing them, and making them constitutional, but by making them CIVIC DUTIES.. Thus constitutional speech and expression and their dissemination would be protected…. Which is certainly NOT the case now.

    The usual objections will be raised by the same ones who object to cameras: intrusion on private lives. But that is silly. My main outlet is wilderness exploration. If drones would follow me everywhere, I would feel safer. They can spy on me all day long, but I do nothing wrong, aside from calculated risk[1].

    The argument, made for years by many of the world’s wealthiest individuals, like Meta’s Zuckenberg, has been a nebulous “People’s right to privacy”. There is no such a thing because the “Right to Privacy” gets ABROGATED BY THE RIGHT TO SURVIVAL (I learned the abrogation idea in my studies of Islamic law, ironically enough…) As the singularity technology evolves, so does the power of individuals: somebody evil could sneak in with, say, Ebola in a jar… But no doubt planning Mass Destruction would involve Internet usage and could be recognized by LAW ENFORCEMENT AI… As long as distinct sources can be identified.

    ***

    Naturally this simple treatment of an Internet malady has not been suggested. Instead fake news media has insisted on applying censorship on sites they consider “violent”. But of course one of the main ways dictatorships achieve control is through censorship of (what they consider to be) “violence” (the coverup is that only the dictator can use violence to suppress what the dictator calls violence)..

    Much of the “culture” that young people are exposed to today is violent and extremely divisive, instead of being informational and collaborative. Why? Well, the established plutocracy has always tried, for keeping in control, to divide (and conquer). The controlling plutocracy has always greater means to adopt the latest tech, as when Hitler adopted air travel and radio to get elected. So naturally, the plutocracy we enjoy adopted Internet control and directing it towards the children was particularly perverse.

    Patrice Ayme 

    ****

    [1] One of my fears is an accident which would leave me crippled and rescue would not arrive in time (I have occasionally been in absolutely gigantic landscapes with no one or no sign of human activity in sight; once in Nevada, a billionaire crashed his plane. Neither he nor the plane were ever found… It’s called Nevada for a good reason… Last year I broke an arm in the mountain consecutive to rock failure and subsequent fall; I took the decision to go down the mountain, waiting for rescue would have meant death from exposure. Being able to tell a drone to fetch rescue, or more precisely blankets and shelter would have been safer. Helis couldn’t fly.)  

    ***

    [2] In 2026 CNN and other plutocratic serving media oligopolies pressured the UK government to shut down entire websites because those sites showed violence. Showing violence somehow causes violence according to CNN (does this theory make CNN into a terrorist organization?). Instead one should behave as if all was for the best in the best of all possible words. 

    Introducing the Internet Password would prevent plutocratic propaganda to claim that the Internet must be censored because children could be exposed to bad things.

    Patrice Ayme

    #books #Fiction #Girls #Internet #InternetPassport #isegoria #news #Parrheisia #politics #SelfHarm #Smartphones #Suicide #writing
  10. The INTERNET PASSPORT Will Advance Civilization, Promote Democracy, Reduce Censorship, Save The Children And Fight Crime. What is There Not To Like?


    The INTERNET PASSPORT would enable to control the age and granular exposure of children to the INTERNET. Presumably, the more than doubling of the suicide rate of girls is related directly to WRONGFUL INTERNET EXPOSURE. Not acting on the Internet Passport would be tantamount to complicity in the abuse and deaths of millions of girls.

    If one enters a country, one is required by the authorities to produce a document called a PASSPORT informing them of our identity. Otherwise NO entry. The controls are stiffer if a child is involved, as they should: child trafficking is as old as humanity (and was outlawed by Queen Bathilde in 657 CE). So why not the same sort of control when entering the Internet?

    A huge problem with the Internet has been too much access by children and access to age inappropriate content. Another bad problem has been the usage of the Internet by Organized Crime.

    A simple way to prevent ILLEGAL INTERNET USAGE is to deliver INTERNET PASSPORTS. A law passed worldwide  would be impossible to access the Internet without an INTERNET PASSPORT  The passports would have a degree of security and control comparable to that of a passport to pass physical ports. I am sure China would have to approve.

    Organized Crime, which profits from adopting the latest Internet tech faster than anybody else, will protest (and some politicians on its payroll will listen). It may be objected by individuals who claim to be good citizens, that the instauration of an INTERNET PASSPORT would introduce a worldwide police state. On a personal basis, I am very much against police states… If the policing goes beyond the law enforcement necessary and sufficient to make sure the constitutional laws are respected. But only then. I firmly believe that a substantial population is kept in check only through the knowledge of potentially efficient police action (I have been a victim of serious crimes more than a few times).

    To make sure that the INTERNET PASSPORT does not bring a non constitutional dictatorship, PARRHEISIA and ISEGORIA which should be META CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES ought to be enforced by arsenals of laws

    Parrheisa and Isegoria basically ensure FREEDOM and EQUALITY of speech, not just by allowing them, and making them constitutional, but by making them CIVIC DUTIES.. Thus constitutional speech and expression and their dissemination would be protected…. Which is certainly NOT the case now.

    The usual objections will be raised by the same ones who object to cameras: intrusion on private lives. But that is silly. My main outlet is wilderness exploration. If drones would follow me everywhere, I would feel safer. They can spy on me all day long, but I do nothing wrong, aside from calculated risk[1].

    The argument, made for years by many of the world’s wealthiest individuals, like Meta’s Zuckenberg, has been a nebulous “People’s right to privacy”. There is no such a thing because the “Right to Privacy” gets ABROGATED BY THE RIGHT TO SURVIVAL (I learned the abrogation idea in my studies of Islamic law, ironically enough…) As the singularity technology evolves, so does the power of individuals: somebody evil could sneak in with, say, Ebola in a jar… But no doubt planning Mass Destruction would involve Internet usage and could be recognized by LAW ENFORCEMENT AI… As long as distinct sources can be identified.

    ***

    Naturally this simple treatment of an Internet malady has not been suggested. Instead fake news media has insisted on applying censorship on sites they consider “violent”. But of course one of the main ways dictatorships achieve control is through censorship of (what they consider to be) “violence” (the coverup is that only the dictator can use violence to suppress what the dictator calls violence)..

    Much of the “culture” that young people are exposed to today is violent and extremely divisive, instead of being informational and collaborative. Why? Well, the established plutocracy has always tried, for keeping in control, to divide (and conquer). The controlling plutocracy has always greater means to adopt the latest tech, as when Hitler adopted air travel and radio to get elected. So naturally, the plutocracy we enjoy adopted Internet control and directing it towards the children was particularly perverse.

    Patrice Ayme 

    ****

    [1] One of my fears is an accident which would leave me crippled and rescue would not arrive in time (I have occasionally been in absolutely gigantic landscapes with no one or no sign of human activity in sight; once in Nevada, a billionaire crashed his plane. Neither he nor the plane were ever found… It’s called Nevada for a good reason… Last year I broke an arm in the mountain consecutive to rock failure and subsequent fall; I took the decision to go down the mountain, waiting for rescue would have meant death from exposure. Being able to tell a drone to fetch rescue, or more precisely blankets and shelter would have been safer. Helis couldn’t fly.)  

    ***

    [2] In 2026 CNN and other plutocratic serving media oligopolies pressured the UK government to shut down entire websites because those sites showed violence. Showing violence somehow causes violence according to CNN (does this theory make CNN into a terrorist organization?). Instead one should behave as if all was for the best in the best of all possible words. 

    Introducing the Internet Password would prevent plutocratic propaganda to claim that the Internet must be censored because children could be exposed to bad things.

    Patrice Ayme

    #books #Fiction #Girls #Internet #InternetPassport #isegoria #news #Parrheisia #politics #SelfHarm #Smartphones #Suicide #writing
  11. Patrick Bruel accusé de viols : 13 plaintes étudiées et d'autres à venir promet une avocate de victimes
    🗞️ Linternaute.com - 🕐 19/05 08:42
    Patrick Bruel est accusé d'agressions sexuelles et de viols par plusieurs femmes, dont huit ayant déposé ou redéposé plainte contre lui. Des enquêtes ont été ouvertes et le parquet de Nanterre a décidé de rouvrir d'anciennes affaires impliquant le ch... [9386 chars]
    🔗 linternaute.com/actualite/pers
    #actu #news #presse #linternaute.com

  12. RE: sportsbots.xyz/users/PatMcAfee

    "Jacoby Brissett is the guy for the Arizona Cardinals this season..

    The minute he stepped in last year this was an efficient offense" ~ @[email protected] #PMSLive