home.social

Search

1000 results for “the_broly_arms”

  1. What I said when the greens arrived.

    Wordle 1,956 3/6*

    ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
    ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨
    🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

  2. ...the composed material to form an underpinning of near-continuous variation, in which virtually the only consistent point is the arrival at the Sam on the words "barase meha." Everything else is up for grabs. Today my voice is warmed up from the first half-hour, and the resulting freedom of motion allows me great freedom of expression.

    5/

  3. The #EU is fighting Elon #Musk's #Starlink on at least five fronts — from blocking access, to boosting rivals, to drafting new rules aimed directly at undermining the tech mogul's growing #dominance over the #space #business.

    politico.eu/article/elon-musk-

  4. The Art of Less Is a Book About Seeing More, Not Having Less

    Back in August, I wrote about this new gestalten book before it was even released. Thanks to the lovely people at gestalten, who sent me a copy, I’ve now had the pleasure of spending the past few weeks with it. Although I received a complimentary copy of the book, everything I write about it in this review reflects my own personal opinion.

    The international edition has been available since September 1, 2026, and the US edition follows today, October 27. Christmas shoppers still have weeks to order. Feeds refresh faster than anyone can read them, so a book that asks for two hands and a quiet hour feels almost radical right now.

    Order the book from gestalten. Order the book on Amazon.

    The Art of Less: An Exploration of Essence is a 320-page hardcover published by gestalten. Jonas Bjerre-Poulsen of Norm Architects and Sarah Dorweiler of Aesence edited it, and it profiles twenty international creatives across five chapters.

    The Art of Less: An Exploration of Essence—a gestalten book review by Dirk Petzold.

    Is The Art of Less Worth $100?

    Yes. I would pay full price, and I would gladly buy a second copy as a gift.

    I judge minimalist work with a rule I call the Presence Test. A piece passes when removing one more element would drain it of presence. In my experience, many minimalism books fail. Their pages look quiet, yet their ideas stay thin.

    The Art of Less passes. I could not find a single page I wanted to cut.

    The price still invites suspicion, and it should. At $100, €70, or £60, this hardcover asks for real commitment. Two things justify that commitment. One is the object. The other is the argument.

    What Is The Art of Less About?

    The book treats minimalism as a sensory and intellectual practice. The editors argue that the urge to reduce grows stronger when life feels overloaded. They call it a human reflex, and they back that claim with twenty examples. The examples come from art, architecture, and design, so the argument never stays in one discipline. Each profile tests the same idea from a different angle. Restraint, in this book, produces presence. That is a sharper thesis than the old line about less being more.

    The claim sounds abstract until you apply it. Think about the last time your inbox and your feed demanded you at once. Did you crave more input, or less?

    Sarah Dorweiler founded Aesence more than ten years ago, and this is her first book. Jonas Bjerre-Poulsen leads Norm Architects, the Copenhagen studio founded in 2008. Norm Architects had already published Soft Minimal and Stillness with gestalten, and Dorweiler took the photographs for Stillness. That shared history shows.

    The collaboration reads like a conversation between two people who have studied the same quiet things for years. A practitioner and a curator rarely write the same book. Here, they do.

    The Five Lenses Behind the Argument

    Five chapters organize the twenty profiles. Each chapter acts as a lens, and each features four creatives.

    • Balance with Nicolas Schuybroek, Danielle Siggerud, Nuria Maria, and Tycjan Knut
    • Contrast with Tatsuro Miki, HENRYTIMI, Lee Ufan, and Rahee Yoon
    • Materiality with Cédric Etienne, Christian + Jade, Maverick Lee, and Antonia Ferrer
    • Rhythm with Liam Stevens, Studio MK27, Krista Mezzadri, and Maria Yelletisch
    • Space with Álvaro Siza, John Pawson, Ylva Carlgren, and Tom Holden

    Four profiles per lens is a smart limit. It keeps every chapter tight and gives each creative room to breathe.

    The Art of Less: An Exploration of Essence—a gestalten book review by Dirk Petzold.

    How Does The Art of Less Feel in Your Hands?

    Binding and Cover

    The Art of Less measures 24.5 × 33 cm, or 9¾ × 13 inches. Retailer data puts the spine at about 3 cm. The 320 pages are stitch-bound.

    Stitch binding matters at this size. Sewn signatures usually outlast glued spines, so a heavy book like this one should survive many openings.

    The cover stays calm. A pale greige surface carries a small title and a small inset photograph of a black rock framed by a dark doorway. The rock is an artwork by Kimsooja, according to gestalten. Nothing on the cover shouts. That restraint sets the tone before you open the book.

    The Handling Tax

    Precious books charge what I call a handling tax. You pay it in hesitation, because every touch risks a crease or a stain. The Art of Less charged me that tax, and I paid it gladly. I turned each page with care and left no marks on paper or cover. I found no flaws in the print or the cover.

    The tax even fits the theme. Slow handling forces slow reading, and slow reading is what a book about restraint deserves.

    Photography That Does Real Work

    The photographs are perfect. I would not change one of them.

    A book about presence depends on its pictures. One busy image would contradict the text at once. Here, every image supports the argument, and the large format gives each one room. Screens flatten texture. Paper at this size restores some of it.

    The writing deserves its own mention. It reads beautifully from the first page.

    Order the book from gestalten. Order the book on Amazon.

    Why Does the Artist Selection Work So Well?

    The artist selection is the smartest decision in the book. The editors place established masters beside younger names, and the pairing produces friction in the best way.

    Álvaro Siza won the Pritzker Prize in 1992, and John Pawson designed the Novy Dvur monastery in the Czech Republic, so anyone who studied architecture already knows how much silence these two can build into stone and light.

    Lee Ufan, a leading voice of the Mono-ha movement, adds sculpture built on elemental tension. The publisher singles out that tension as a signature of his work.

    Younger names such as Tycjan Knut in Balance and Rahee Yoon in Contrast sit beside these giants without apology. That placement argues that minimalism remains a living practice.

    The map matters too. Siza built his career in Porto, and Studio MK27 works from São Paulo. Minimalism looks different in each climate, and the book lets those differences show.

    How Does The Art of Less Compare With Earlier Minimalism Books?

    John Pawson’s Minimum, published by Phaidon in 1996, set the visual template for the genre. It showed readers what reduction looks like.

    Norm Architects’ Soft Minimal went further inside one studio. It explains how the team thinks and designs.

    The Art of Less widens that view to twenty creatives. It also asks what reduction does to the person standing in the room. That question sets it apart from every minimalism book on my shelf.

    Where Does Minimalism Go Next?

    I expect this book to influence how publishers pitch minimalism. Two changes seem likely by the end of 2027.

    1. More minimalism titles will present themselves as tools for attention and drop the style-guide angle.
    2. Heavy, tactile print will gain ground against feeds. Gestalten’s own media pitches for this book stress the rising demand for haptic, physical experiences.

    I could be wrong about the pace. I doubt I am wrong about the direction.

    Here is a definition worth quoting. Sensory minimalism, as I define it, is the practice of reducing a space or an object until what remains holds more attention than the whole once did.

    How Should You Read The Art of Less?

    Read it in five sittings. I call this the One-Lens Evening. Take one chapter per sitting, and leave your phone in another room.

    Look at each photograph before you read its text. Then read the text and look again.

    Is The Art of Less a Good Christmas Gift for Architecture Lovers?

    Yes. I can’t think of a better gift for anyone who loves art and architecture, and designers will treasure it too.

    The list prices are €70 in Germany, £60 in the UK, and $100 in the US. Gestalten’s shop lists free shipping above $49 in the US and above €29 in the EU. Order by mid-November if you want to wrap it before Christmas.

    Who Should Skip It?

    Skip it if you want a decluttering manual. The book is built around twenty profiles, so it offers examples and ideas. Buy something else if you need a ten-step system for your closet.

    The Art of Less at a Glance

    DetailInformationTitleThe Art of Less: An Exploration of EssencePublishergestaltenEditorsJonas Bjerre-Poulsen (Norm Architects) and Sarah Dorweiler (Aesence)Format24.5 × 33 cm (9¾ × 13 in)Pages320, full colorBindingHardcover, stitch-boundLanguageEnglishPrice€70 (Germany), £60 (UK), $100 (US)ReleaseInternational: September 1, 2026. USA: October 27, 2026ISBN978-3-96704-245-0StructureFive chapters, twenty creatives, four per chapterCover artworkBlack rock by KimsoojaMy verdictWorth the price. I found no flaws.Best forArt and architecture fans, and designers Order the book from gestalten. Order the book on Amazon.

    Frequently Asked Questions About The Art of Less

    Is The Art of Less worth buying?

    Yes. After several weeks with the book, I found no flaws in the print or the cover, and the photography holds up page after page. At $100, it costs more than most design books, but it passes my Presence Test.

    Who edited The Art of Less?

    Jonas Bjerre-Poulsen of the Copenhagen studio Norm Architects and Sarah Dorweiler, founder of the minimalist art publication Aesence, edited the book for gestalten. It is Dorweiler’s first book.

    What are the five chapters of The Art of Less?

    Balance, Contrast, Materiality, Rhythm, and Space. Each chapter profiles four creatives.

    How much does The Art of Less cost?

    The list price is €70 in Germany, £60 in the UK, and $100 in the US. Gestalten’s shop lists free shipping above $49 in the US and above €29 in the EU.

    When does The Art of Less come out in the US?

    The US edition publishes on October 27, 2026. The international edition has been available since September 1, 2026.

    Is The Art of Less a how-to guide to minimalism?

    No. The book follows twenty profiles of creatives and offers examples and ideas. Readers who want a decluttering system should look elsewhere.

    Where can I buy The Art of Less?

    You can order it from the gestalten shop or from Amazon.com. Independent bookstores can order it too, and the ISBN is 978-3-96704-245-0.

    Browse WE AND THE COLOR’s Books category for more.

    Subscribe to our newsletter!

    #architecture #art #artists #book #books #Gestalten #interiorDesign #lessIsMore
  5. The flush toilet is the basis of Western civilization.
    -- Alan Coult

  6. In like first grade the music teacher would play this corny song called "Buy Back the Amazon" or something and I'm sure in today's world they'd replace it with "I could buy that on Amazon"

  7. The Ministerial Investment Scheme: Where Public Office Comes with a Receipt and a Recovery Plan By Lawson Akhigbe

    In the grand theatre of Nigerian politics, where truth occasionally stumbles onto the stage like an uninvited guest who has had one too many, Alwan Hassan has just delivered a masterclass in accidental honesty.

    lawakhigbe.com/2026/10/27/the-

  8. Speedball
    (Virgin/The Bitmap Brothers, 1991)

    🕹️ Play online:
    google.com/search?q=play+Maste

    Speedball is a fast-paced future sport game with five players on each team, allowing for intense gameplay. Bribe the referee for advantages, compete in tournaments or 2-player games, and use any means necessary to score in your opponent's goal.

    #sega #MasterSystem #retrogaming #retrogames
    (Video: screenscraper.fr)

  9. The wave needs to be huge.
    “USpol

    “Democrats retain significant midterm electoral advantages, with key data pointing to them being the favorites to win control of the U.S. House. But, there are indications of why a potential wave could be limited, a new NPR/PBS News/Marist poll finds.” - NPR

    apple.news/AfNlp6-Z_S-a6lBHFtp

  10. The "prompt box" is becoming a legacy interface. 🏗️ From robots that learn by watching you to AI that "de-bloats" your TV, we’re moving toward the **Ambient Prompt**.

    Is Prompt Engineering dying, or just evolving into infrastructure?

    Read the full deep-dive here: aing.ndrini.eu/the-death-of-th

    ---

    #ai
  11. The Need for Speed: Unlocking Your Website's Potential with the Critical Rendering Path


    Ever felt that pang of impatience waiting for a website to load? You know, that agonizing moment where the screen is just a blank canvas, and you start questioning your internet connection, your life choices, anything to explain the delay? We've all been there. In the blink-and-you'll-miss-it world of the internet, speed isn't just a nice-to-have; it's the make-or-break factor for user engagement, conversion rates, and even your search engine ranking. And at the heart of this speedy performance lies a concept called the Critical Rendering Path (CRP).

    Think of your website as a delicious cake. To bake that cake and present it to your eager guests (your users), you need a recipe. The CRP is essentially the most efficient recipe for building your website's visual representation on the user's screen, as quickly as possible. It's about understanding the essential ingredients and the most direct steps to get that cake out of the oven and onto the table.

    This article will dive deep into the fascinating world of the Critical Rendering Path. We'll break down what it is, why it's so darn important, and how you can optimize it to make your website lightning-fast and your users incredibly happy. So, buckle up, grab a virtual coffee, and let's get cracking!

    What Exactly is This "Critical Rendering Path" Thing Anyway?


    Imagine you're building a LEGO castle. You can't just throw all the bricks together randomly. You need a plan, a sequence. First, you lay the foundation. Then, you build the walls, followed by the towers, and finally, you add the decorative flags. The Critical Rendering Path is the web browser's equivalent of this LEGO plan.

    In technical terms, the Critical Rendering Path refers to the sequence of steps a web browser takes from the moment it receives HTML and CSS to the point where it can visually render pixels on the screen. It's the chain of events that must happen for your user to see your beautiful website.

    Let's break down these steps:

    1. Parsing HTML: The browser receives the HTML document and starts parsing it, creating a Document Object Model (DOM). The DOM is like a tree-like structure representing the content and hierarchy of your HTML.
    2. Processing CSS: As the browser encounters CSS in your HTML (either inline, in <style> tags, or linked external stylesheets), it parses this CSS and creates a CSS Object Model (CSSOM). The CSSOM represents the styles applied to your DOM elements.
    3. Combining DOM and CSSOM into a Render Tree: This is where the magic starts to happen. The browser combines the DOM and CSSOM to create a Render Tree. The Render Tree contains only the visible elements of your page and their associated styles. Elements like <head> or elements with display: none; are excluded.
    4. Layout (or Reflow): With the Render Tree in hand, the browser needs to figure out the exact position and size of each element on the screen. This is the layout or reflow process. It's like measuring and marking where each LEGO brick goes.
    5. Painting (or Rasterization): Finally, the browser takes the layout information and "paints" the pixels onto the screen. This is the painting or rasterization step, where your website finally comes to life visually.

    Crucially, the CRP is "critical" because any delay in these steps will directly impact the perceived loading speed of your page. If one step is slow, the entire process is held up.

    Why Should You Even Care About the CRP? (The "Advantages" Section, aka "Why You Need This Speed!)


    Optimizing the Critical Rendering Path isn't just an exercise for web developers to show off their technical prowess. It has tangible, real-world benefits for your website and your business.

    • Blazing-Fast User Experience: This is the most obvious and impactful advantage. Users get to see content sooner. This leads to less frustration, more engagement, and a higher likelihood of them sticking around. Imagine landing on a site and seeing content appear within seconds rather than staring at a blank screen. That's the power of CRP optimization.
    • Improved Conversion Rates: When users can quickly see and interact with your product or service, they are more likely to convert – whether that's making a purchase, signing up for a newsletter, or filling out a form. Speed directly translates to revenue.
    • SEO Boost: Search engines like Google absolutely love fast websites. A good Core Web Vitals score, heavily influenced by CRP performance, is a significant ranking factor. A faster site can mean higher search engine rankings, leading to more organic traffic.
    • Reduced Bounce Rates: If your site takes too long to load, users will likely hit the "back" button and try a competitor. Optimizing the CRP helps keep users on your site longer.
    • Mobile-First Performance: With the majority of internet traffic coming from mobile devices, optimizing for speed on these networks is paramount. CRP optimization is especially critical for mobile users who often have slower connections.


    The Flip Side of the Coin: Potential "Disadvantages" (Or, "Why It's Not Always a Walk in the Park")


    While the benefits are undeniable, optimizing the CRP isn't always a straightforward process. There are challenges and considerations to keep in mind.

    • Complexity and Learning Curve: Understanding the intricacies of the CRP and implementing effective optimizations can be challenging. It requires a good grasp of web technologies and how browsers work.
    • Balancing Performance with Functionality: Sometimes, aggressive optimization might involve trade-offs. For instance, deferring non-critical JavaScript might mean certain interactive elements appear slightly later. Finding the right balance is key.
    • Requires Ongoing Maintenance: The web is constantly evolving, and new content or features can impact your CRP. It's not a "set it and forget it" kind of optimization. Regular monitoring and adjustments are necessary.
    • Potential for Over-Optimization: While rare, it's possible to get so caught up in optimizing that you might accidentally break something or make your code less readable and maintainable.
    • Tooling and Debugging: Identifying and fixing CRP bottlenecks can sometimes involve complex debugging and the use of specialized performance tools.


    Key "Features" of a Well-Optimized Critical Rendering Path (The "How-To" Section)


    Now that we understand what the CRP is and why it matters, let's get to the good stuff: how to actually optimize it! This is where we get hands-on with some actionable strategies.

    1. Minimize the Critical HTML & CSS


    The core idea here is to reduce the amount of data the browser has to process for the initial render.

    • Inline Critical CSS: This is a game-changer. Instead of waiting for an external CSS file to download, you embed the CSS required to render the above-the-fold content directly within your HTML. This allows the browser to start rendering immediately.

      Example:

      <!DOCTYPE html>
      <html>
      <head>
      <title>My Speedy Page</title>
      <style>
      /* Inline critical CSS for above-the-fold content */
      body {
      font-family: sans-serif;
      margin: 0;
      }
      .hero-section {
      background-color: #f0f0f0;
      padding: 50px;
      text-align: center;
      }
      h1 {
      color: #333;
      }
      </style>
      <!-- Link to non-critical CSS -->
      <link rel="preload" href="styles.css" as="style" onload="this.onload=null;this.rel='stylesheet'">
      <noscript><link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css"></noscript>
      </head>
      <body>
      <section class="hero-section">
      <h1>Welcome to My Fast Website!</h1>
      <p>Content that loads instantly.</p>
      </section>
      <!-- Rest of your content -->
      </body>
      </html>

      Explanation:

      • The <style> block contains the CSS needed for the .hero-section to be visible immediately.
      • The link rel="preload" with as="style" tells the browser to fetch the styles.css file but not to block rendering. onload then applies it once downloaded.
      • The noscript tag ensures that users with JavaScript disabled still get the stylesheet.


    • Minify HTML and CSS: Remove unnecessary characters (whitespace, comments) from your HTML and CSS files. This reduces file sizes, leading to faster downloads. Many build tools (like Webpack or Gulp) and online minifiers can do this automatically.


    2. Defer and Asynchronously Load JavaScript


    JavaScript can be a major bottleneck in the CRP. When the browser encounters a <script> tag, it typically stops parsing HTML, downloads the script, executes it, and then resumes parsing. This is often unnecessary for scripts that aren't immediately needed for rendering.

    • defer Attribute: This attribute tells the browser to download the script in the background while continuing to parse HTML. The script will then execute only after the HTML parsing is complete.

      Example:

      <script defer src="my-non-critical-script.js"></script>

    • async Attribute: This attribute also downloads the script in the background, but it executes the script as soon as it's downloaded, potentially before HTML parsing is complete. This is useful for independent scripts that don't rely on the DOM.

      Example:

      <script async src="my-analytics-script.js"></script>

    • Move Scripts to the End of <body>: While defer and async are preferred, a common older technique is to place all your non-critical JavaScript just before the closing </body> tag.
    • Code Splitting: Break down your JavaScript into smaller chunks. Load only the JavaScript that's necessary for the current view or interaction. Tools like Webpack excel at this.


    3. Optimize Images


    Images are often the largest assets on a webpage and can significantly impact loading times.

    • Optimize Image Files: Compress your images without sacrificing visual quality. Use tools like TinyPNG, ImageOptim, or even online compressors.
    • Use Modern Image Formats: Consider using formats like WebP, which offer better compression and quality compared to JPEG or PNG.
    • Responsive Images: Use the <picture> element or srcset attribute to serve appropriately sized images for different screen sizes and resolutions.

      Example:

      <picture>
      <source srcset="large-image.webp" media="(min-width: 1024px)">
      <source srcset="medium-image.webp" media="(min-width: 600px)">
      <img src="small-image.webp" alt="A descriptive alt text">
      </picture>

    • Lazy Loading: Defer the loading of images that are not immediately visible on the screen (i.e., below the fold). They will only load when the user scrolls down.

      Example:

      <img src="your-image.jpg" loading="lazy" alt="Descriptive alt text">


    4. Leverage Browser Caching


    Caching allows the browser to store copies of your website's resources (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images) locally. This way, on subsequent visits, the browser can load these resources from the local cache instead of re-downloading them from the server, dramatically speeding up loading times.

    • Set Appropriate Cache Headers: Configure your web server (e.g., Apache, Nginx) to send Cache-Control headers for static assets.

      Example (Nginx configuration):

      location ~* \.(css|js|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|ico|svg|webp)$ {
      expires 1y;
      add_header Cache-Control "public, no-transform";
      }


    5. Prioritize Above-the-Fold Content


    The "above-the-fold" content is what users see immediately when they land on your page without scrolling. This is the most critical part to get right for a good initial impression.

    • Identify Critical Resources: Determine which HTML, CSS, and JavaScript are absolutely essential to render this initial viewport.
    • Inline Critical CSS: As mentioned earlier, this is key for visual content.
    • Defer Non-Critical JavaScript: Move or defer scripts that aren't needed for the immediate display of above-the-fold content.


    6. Reduce Server Response Time


    Even with optimized front-end assets, a slow server can still cripple your CRP.

    • Optimize Server-Side Code: Ensure your backend code is efficient and doesn't take too long to generate the HTML response.
    • Use a Content Delivery Network (CDN): CDNs distribute your website's assets across multiple servers globally. This means users can download assets from a server geographically closer to them, reducing latency.
    • Enable HTTP/2 or HTTP/3: These newer protocols offer significant performance improvements over HTTP/1.1, especially for handling multiple requests concurrently.


    7. Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources


    Any resource that prevents the browser from rendering the page until it's downloaded and processed is considered "render-blocking."

    • Identify Render-Blocking CSS and JavaScript: Use browser developer tools (Performance tab) to identify these bottlenecks.
    • Inline Critical CSS: The primary solution for render-blocking CSS.
    • Defer/Async JavaScript: The primary solution for render-blocking JavaScript.


    Tools for the Job (Your Performance Toolkit)


    To effectively optimize your CRP, you'll need the right tools:

    • Browser Developer Tools: Your best friend! Chrome DevTools, Firefox Developer Edition, and Edge DevTools offer invaluable features:
      • Performance Tab: Record page loads to analyze the CRP, identify bottlenecks, and see how long each step takes.
      • Network Tab: Inspect all network requests, their sizes, and timings.
      • Lighthouse: An automated tool built into Chrome DevTools that audits performance, accessibility, SEO, and more. It provides actionable recommendations for CRP optimization.


    • WebPageTest: An online tool that allows you to test your website's speed from various locations and browsers.
    • GTmetrix: Another popular online tool for analyzing website speed and performance.
    • Google PageSpeed Insights: Provides a score for your page's performance on both mobile and desktop, with specific recommendations.


    Conclusion: Embrace the Speed!


    The Critical Rendering Path is a fundamental concept for anyone serious about website performance. By understanding how browsers construct your webpages and by strategically optimizing the resources that contribute to the initial render, you can unlock a world of benefits: happier users, higher conversions, and better search engine rankings.

    It's not about magic tricks; it's about a systematic approach to delivering your content efficiently. Start by identifying your current CRP bottlenecks, then implement the strategies discussed – inline critical CSS, defer JavaScript, optimize images, leverage caching, and prioritize above-the-fold content.

    Remember, website performance is an ongoing journey, not a destination. The web is dynamic, and your optimizations will need to adapt. But by making the Critical Rendering Path a core part of your development process, you'll be well on your way to building faster, more engaging, and ultimately, more successful websites. So, go forth and optimize – your users (and your bottom line) will thank you for it!#frontend #performance #webdev #software #coding #development #engineering #inclusive #community
    Optimization: Critical Rendering Path

  12. The facts thus far presented tend to prove the superiority of the female organization.

    -- Eliza Burt Gamble (The Evolution of Woman: An Inquiry into the Dogma of Her Inferiority (Preface), 1894)

  13. The @Eagles can no longer hurt me I am numb at this point fr .. being bad is one thing .. losing to the cowboys is unacceptable #nfl

  14. Keystone wants users to destroy their hardware wallets. Not update them or reset them. Just destroy them. Hackers grabbed the device verification key, leaving 18,835 units compromised at the root.

    theperimetersite.com/report/407

    #ransomware #vulnerability #infosec

  15. The Cookware and Bakeware Every Home Chef Needs diningandcooking.com/chefs/120 #Chef #Collection:CookingTools&Cookware #Collection:GoodHousekeepingAwards #ContentType:RoundUp:Products #ContentId:A28b702fDe5149c894e34d413818c920 #DisplayType:LongFormArticle #HasProduct:True #IsSyndicated:False #Locale:US #ShortTitle:AwardWinningCookware&Bakeware #Sponsored:False #Subsection:KitchenProducts

  16. The review usually opens with a demo that looks fine. An agent plans four edits, applies them to a workspace on a remote box, and reports success; the tests are green and everyone relaxes. Two hours later a human's refactor is gone, and nobody can point at the request that removed it. Is that a model problem, a server problem, or a protocol problem?

    I think it is a protocol problem almost every time, and I want to make the case with an executable fixture rather than an architecture diagram. Below is the event order I keep reconstructing in reviews, the invariant it violates, and a small simulator that will fail your design for you. Everything here is a model of a system, not a benchmark of a vendor.

    1. The event order that silently wins


    A planner reads the workspace at revision 0 and emits three steps against app.py. Step 1 applies and the workspace moves to revision 1. While step 2 is in flight, either a human edits that file or the session is re-routed to a different model that re-plans the remainder; both are ordinary events, not incidents.

    Step 2 still carries the content hash it was planned against. If the executor applies patches by path without checking that hash or the revision, the write lands on content the planner never saw, and the old bytes vanish. Nobody gets an error, because a patch is not a request — it is a claim about a state that may already be false.

    The failure is invisible precisely when it is most expensive. The agent's summary says "updated handler and tests", the test run passes because the overwritten hunk was unrelated, and the loss only surfaces at the next merge. Who is supposed to notice that?

    2. The invariant, stated once


    No step may be applied unless the state it was planned against is still the state it is applied to, or the step has been explicitly rebased onto the new state.

    That is it. Note what the invariant does not say: it does not say a step is correct, and it does not say a retried step is safe. A revision fence prevents stale acceptance; idempotency prevents double application. Teams routinely build one, assume they have the other, and then argue about whose bug it is.

    3. Declared assumptions


    • One writer per file at a time; concurrent multi-writer edits are out of scope and need a merge protocol, not a fence.
    • The workspace has a monotonic revision counter and a per-file content hash that are both persisted with the workspace itself.
    • A step is planned from a readable snapshot and carries (step_id, base_rev, path, pre_hash, patch).
    • Execution may be preempted at any point between "patch written" and "client received the result".
    • Model identity may change inside a session, because routing, fallback, or a free-tier allowance running out can move you to another model without warning.


    4. Data flow and failure domains


    There are three state holders and they fail independently: the planner's context (lossy, model-dependent), the executor's workspace (authoritative, preemptible), and the client's view of progress (optimistic, retried). The only durable truth is the workspace plus whatever journal you persist alongside it.

    Failure domains worth separating in review: stale plan (planner state diverged), lost ack (executor applied, client did not learn), duplicate delivery (client retried an applied step), and re-plan drift (a new model emits steps against an old base). They need different mechanisms, and a single retry counter hides all four.

    5. The fixture


    This is deterministic Python with no model calls, so the verdicts below are properties of the protocol, not of any provider.

    # fence_sim.py - deterministic, no LLM involved
    from dataclasses import dataclass

    @dataclass(frozen=True)
    class Step:
    step_id: str
    base_rev: int
    path: str
    pre_hash: str
    patch: str

    class Workspace:
    def __init__(self):
    self.rev = 0
    self.files = {"app.py": "v0"}
    self.journal = set() # persisted with the workspace
    def hash(self, path):
    return self.files
    [path] def write(self, path, content):
    self.files[path] = content
    self.rev += 1

    class Executor:
    """fence: 'none' | 'plan' | 'step'; dedupe: journal-backed idempotency"""
    def __init__(self, ws, fence="step", dedupe=True):
    self.ws, self.fence, self.dedupe = ws, fence, dedupe
    self.plan_rev = None
    def plan(self, rev):
    self.plan_rev = rev
    def stamp(self, s):
    if self.fence == "step":
    return Step(s.step_id, self.ws.rev, s.path, self.ws.hash(s.path), s.patch)
    if self.fence == "plan":
    return Step(s.step_id, self.plan_rev, s.path, s.pre_hash, s.patch)
    return s
    def exec(self, s):
    s = self.stamp(s)
    key = (s.step_id, s.base_rev)
    if self.dedupe and key in self.ws.journal:
    return "deduped"
    if self.fence != "none":
    if s.base_rev != self.ws.rev:
    return "rejected:stale_rev"
    if self.ws.hash(s.path) != s.pre_hash:
    return "rejected:pre_hash"
    self.ws.write(s.path, s.patch)
    if self.dedupe:
    self.ws.journal.add(key)
    return "applied"

    Two lines deserve attention. The journal lives in Workspace, not in the executor, because an in-process dedupe set dies with the server that was preempted — which is exactly the trap. And stamp is where fence granularity is decided, so you can argue about it in one place.

    6. Injecting the three failures


    Run the same three scenarios across fence modes and record the verdicts. The interference classes are injected explicitly, so the denominator is the number of injections, not the number of suspicious log lines.

    def scenario_concurrent_edit(fence):
    ws = Workspace(); ex = Executor(ws, fence=fence); ex.plan(ws.rev)
    s1 = Step("s1", 0, "app.py", "v0", "v1")
    s2 = Step("s2", 1, "app.py", "v1", "v2")
    assert ex.exec(s1) == "applied"
    ws.write("app.py", "human-refactor") # interference: rev 2
    return ex.exec(s2)

    def scenario_preemption_retry(fence):
    ws = Workspace(); ex = Executor(ws, fence=fence)
    s1 = Step("s1", 0, "app.py", "v0", "v1")
    ex.exec(s1)
    # ack lost; client replays s1 against a fresh executor, same persisted workspace
    return Executor(ws, fence=fence).exec(s1)

    def scenario_replan_drift(fence):
    ws = Workspace(); ex = Executor(ws, fence=fence); ex.plan(ws.rev)
    ex.exec(Step("s1", 0, "app.py", "v0", "v1"))
    ex.plan(ws.rev) # new model re-plans from rev 1
    return ex.exec(Step("s2", 0, "app.py", "v0", "v1-tail"))

    Expected output, because the simulation is deterministic and calls no model:

    fence=none concurrent_edit -> applied preemption_retry -> applied twice replan_drift -> applied
    fence=plan concurrent_edit -> rejected:stale_rev preemption_retry -> rejected:stale_rev replan_drift -> rejected:stale_rev
    fence=step concurrent_edit -> rejected:stale_rev preemption_retry -> rejected:stale_rev replan_drift -> applied
    dedupe on concurrent_edit -> rejected:stale_rev preemption_retry -> deduped replan_drift -> applied

    Read the second and third rows together, because that is the argument. A plan-level fence turns every retry into a spurious rejection and every legitimate re-plan into a dead end; it is loud, but it is loud in the wrong places. A step-level fence plus a persisted journal gets you the two properties you actually want, and it costs you a durable set of (step_id, base_rev) keys.

    7. Making it a property, not a demo


    Three scenarios are an anecdote. Turn them into invariants and let a random interleaving search hunt for violations — this is the part I would block a design review on.

    def invariants_hold(ws, results):
    # P1: every applied step saw base_rev == rev at apply time
    assert all(r.rev_at_apply == r.base_rev for r in results if r.status == "applied")
    # P2: journal is append-only per (step_id, base_rev)
    assert ws.journal == set(ws.journal)
    # P3: no path content was replaced by a step older than the current rev
    assert all(r.base_rev <= r.rev_at_apply for r in results)

    Then fuzz: shuffle {human_edit, preempt, retry, replan, duplicate_delivery} over a fixed step list, run 5,000 seeds, and assert P1 and P2 for every seed with fences on. Run the same search with fence="none" to extract a minimal counterexample, and put that event order in the PR description as the regression case. A protocol claim without a counterexample search is a preference.

    8. Where the free tier changes the arithmetic


    If your executor is a shared, preemptible environment and your planner can move between models at any time, then re-plan drift and lost acks are not edge cases — they are the steady state. That is the actual architectural consequence of running agents on free resources, and it argues for cheap, persisted fences rather than expensive coordination.

    I use MonkeyCode as the concrete instance of that environment in this review: it is an open-source coding agent whose operator supplies free model access (currently advertised as a 10M-token allowance) and a free server option. Treat those numbers as operator-supplied and re-verify them on the project page before you design around them, because allowances and routing change faster than any architecture does. My interest here is narrow: a free server makes preemption ordinary, and free model access makes mid-session re-routing ordinary, so both of my injected interferences become Tuesday.

    Disclosure: This article was prepared as part of MonkeyCode's product outreach.

    9. Tradeoffs I would write down

    MechanismBuys youCosts youFails whenNo fenceThroughput, simplicitySilent lost updatesAny concurrent editPlan-level fenceLoud, cheap rejectionRe-planning whole plans, spurious retriesModel swap or long plansStep-level fencePrecise staleness detectionA re-stamp on every dispatchSemantic overlap between stepsPersisted journalIdempotent retry across preemptionDurable key storage, growth controlJournal not persisted atomically with the writeCheckpoint per stepFast compensationStorage, restore latencyLarge binaries, long test suites

    10. Verdicts: reject, replay, or compensate

    Event orderCorrect verdictWhyStep arrives, base_rev < current rev, no overlapReject, re-plan from current revThe plan is stale; the patch is not recoverableStep arrives, journal contains (step_id, base_rev)Replay the stored resultThe work is done; the ack is what was lostStep applied, tests for touched files failCompensate to the checkpointFence passed, semantics did notNew model re-plans mid-session from current revAccept if re-stamped and preconditions holdDrift is expected, staleness is notTwo steps with overlapping hunks in one planReject the plan at admissionA fence cannot order siblings

    11. What I would change next


    1. Persist the revision counter, file hashes, and journal in one atomic write, so a crash cannot leave a patch without its key.
    2. Stamp base_rev at dispatch, never at plan time, and log both values — the delta is your drift signal.
    3. Bound the journal by session and drop it only after a checkpoint the workspace itself can prove.
    4. Run the fuzz job in CI with fences on, and store the minimal counterexample from fence="none" as a named regression seed.
    5. Add a sibling-overlap check at plan admission, because per-step fences order nothing within a plan.


    12. Limits, and who should skip this


    The fixture models file-level hashing and a single writer; it says nothing about merge semantics, and it does not evaluate whether a patch was any good. If your model swap also changes plan quality, this protocol will happily accept a worse plan that happens to be revision-correct. That is a separate evaluation problem, and no fence will solve it for you.

    Skip this if your agent is single-turn and single-file with a human watching every apply, if your platform already gives each step an atomic worktree or VM snapshot, or if you cannot persist a journal durably — half of this mechanism without the journal is worse than none, because it rejects retries without making them safe.

    So here is the question I would leave in the review thread: which event order in your system breaks the invariant — a human edit racing step two, an ack lost after the write, or a re-plan against a stale base — and for that specific order, should the executor reject, replay, or compensate?#ai #architecture #distributed #testing #software #coding #development #engineering #inclusive #community
    Treat a Coding-Agent Step as a Revision-Fenced Command, Not a Prompt

  17. On top of being blatantly evil, Palmer Lucky looks like the winner of a world's twattiest dweeb contest

  18. North Carolina legislators closed their on-campus voting sites. HBCU students marched miles to vote anyway
    By Adria R Walker

    Last year, the state’s board of elections removed several polling sites from local colleges – and students have taken it upon themselves to organize voting

    theguardian.com/us-news/2026/o

    #NorthCarolina #USuniversities #USmidtermelections2026 #Highereducation #USnews #Studentpolitics #USvotingrights #ProtestUS #Electioninterference #Students #TheGuardian #AdriaRWalker

  19. The BBC are "very compliant to Israel" about Gaza & won't allow the word "genocide".

    In Francesca Albanese's report on western media's pro-Israel reporting, the BBC was the worst, camouflaging Israeli ­responsibility in 83% of headlines.

    "BBC presenters dismissed assertions that Israel was committing genocide while not reporting Israeli leaders’ genocidal statements”.

    israelpalestinenews.org/bbc-se

    #BBC #UKPol #USPol #EUPol #palestine #gazaGenocide #gaza #news .

  20. 🚨 BREAKING | SAUDI OIL HUB UNDER THREAT

    Yemen’s Houthis claim a ballistic missile strike on Saudi Arabia’s Ras Tanura refinery.

    🔥 A fire near the oil terminal has been separately reported—but a direct missile hit and damage remain unverified.

    The Iran war’s energy front is escalating.

    🔴 LIVE UPDATES:
    thelevantfiles.org/2026/10/ira

    #BreakingNews #IranWar #SaudiArabia #Houthis #RasTanura #Oil

  21. (YouTube) Tumbling "E" soundscapes generated by The vOICe vision BCI youtube.com/watch?v=9JYpdOvcdd4 Use stereo headphones at modest volume. Functional form vision? (After training)

  22. ‘No one saves the planet if it hits their pocket’: UK heat pump installers fear planned subsidy cuts
    By Matthew Pearce

    Boiler upgrade scheme, which provides grants of up to £9,000 for sustainable alternatives, expected to be slashed in budget

    theguardian.com/environment/20

    #Heatpumps #Environment #Budget2026 #Environmentpolicy #Gas #UKnews #Energy #TheGuardian #MatthewPearce

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.