home.social

#systematicreview — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #systematicreview, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Here's a fun one for #EvidenceSynthesis / #SystematicReview crowd 📚

    @ZijunLi and me are doing a meta-analysis where we compare two groups.

    We use the "Cohen's d" family of effect size metrics for the meta-analysis (comparing baseline to follow-up, immediate and later)

    Some studies (e.g. smoking interventions) only report a percentage in each arm (e.g. % of smokers).

    How to best convert these percentages into smth Cohen's d-ish? 🤔

    We appreciate any help / boosting!

  2. Here's a fun one for #EvidenceSynthesis / #SystematicReview crowd 📚

    @ZijunLi and me are doing a meta-analysis where we compare two groups.

    We use the "Cohen's d" family of effect size metrics for the meta-analysis (comparing baseline to follow-up, immediate and later)

    Some studies (e.g. smoking interventions) only report a percentage in each arm (e.g. % of smokers).

    How to best convert these percentages into smth Cohen's d-ish? 🤔

    We appreciate any help / boosting!

  3. Here's a fun one for #EvidenceSynthesis / #SystematicReview crowd 📚

    @ZijunLi and me are doing a meta-analysis where we compare two groups.

    We use the "Cohen's d" family of effect size metrics for the meta-analysis (comparing baseline to follow-up, immediate and later)

    Some studies (e.g. smoking interventions) only report a percentage in each arm (e.g. % of smokers).

    How to best convert these percentages into smth Cohen's d-ish? 🤔

    We appreciate any help / boosting!

  4. Here's a fun one for #EvidenceSynthesis / #SystematicReview crowd 📚

    @ZijunLi and me are doing a meta-analysis where we compare two groups.

    We use the "Cohen's d" family of effect size metrics for the meta-analysis (comparing baseline to follow-up, immediate and later)

    Some studies (e.g. smoking interventions) only report a percentage in each arm (e.g. % of smokers).

    How to best convert these percentages into smth Cohen's d-ish? 🤔

    We appreciate any help / boosting!

  5. Here's a fun one for #EvidenceSynthesis / #SystematicReview crowd 📚

    @ZijunLi and me are doing a meta-analysis where we compare two groups.

    We use the "Cohen's d" family of effect size metrics for the meta-analysis (comparing baseline to follow-up, immediate and later)

    Some studies (e.g. smoking interventions) only report a percentage in each arm (e.g. % of smokers).

    How to best convert these percentages into smth Cohen's d-ish? 🤔

    We appreciate any help / boosting!

  6. Does anyone have experience with CADIMA for screening articles? www.cadima.info I’d be interested in hearing thoughts, especially if you can compare it to rayyan #evidencesynthesis #systematicreview

    CADIMA

  7. Can #AI handle abstract screening for a #systematicReview?

    Li et al. tested #ChatGPT, #PaLM, #Llama, #Claude, and various techniques on 3 datasets.

    #GPT4 was consistently at least 90% accurate (vs gold standard) with balanced sensitivity & specificity.

    doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-026

  8. Can #AI handle abstract screening for a #systematicReview?

    Li et al. tested #ChatGPT, #PaLM, #Llama, #Claude, and various techniques on 3 datasets.

    #GPT4 was consistently at least 90% accurate (vs gold standard) with balanced sensitivity & specificity.

    doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-026

  9. Can #AI handle abstract screening for a #systematicReview?

    Li et al. tested #ChatGPT, #PaLM, #Llama, #Claude, and various techniques on 3 datasets.

    #GPT4 was consistently at least 90% accurate (vs gold standard) with balanced sensitivity & specificity.

    doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-026

  10. Can #AI handle abstract screening for a #systematicReview?

    Li et al. tested #ChatGPT, #PaLM, #Llama, #Claude, and various techniques on 3 datasets.

    #GPT4 was consistently at least 90% accurate (vs gold standard) with balanced sensitivity & specificity.

    doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-026

  11. Can #AI handle abstract screening for a #systematicReview?

    Li et al. tested #ChatGPT, #PaLM, #Llama, #Claude, and various techniques on 3 datasets.

    #GPT4 was consistently at least 90% accurate (vs gold standard) with balanced sensitivity & specificity.

    doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-026

  12. From June 2025:

    I don't trust large language model (#LLM) AIs: They're trained to sound plausible without regard for accuracy, ie, generate bullshit.

    If you can handle that "spicy" description, please read this essay by @researchfairy, describing how LLMs can be used to deliberately weaponize #SystematicReview articles. Want a topic review that will completely plausibly support your controversial viewpoint? Say, you want to support raw milk or decry #vaccination ?

    blog.bgcarlisle.com/2025/05/16

  13. From June 2025:

    I don't trust large language model (#LLM) AIs: They're trained to sound plausible without regard for accuracy, ie, generate bullshit.

    If you can handle that "spicy" description, please read this essay by @researchfairy, describing how LLMs can be used to deliberately weaponize #SystematicReview articles. Want a topic review that will completely plausibly support your controversial viewpoint? Say, you want to support raw milk or decry #vaccination ?

    blog.bgcarlisle.com/2025/05/16

  14. From June 2025:

    I don't trust large language model (#LLM) AIs: They're trained to sound plausible without regard for accuracy, ie, generate bullshit.

    If you can handle that "spicy" description, please read this essay by @researchfairy, describing how LLMs can be used to deliberately weaponize #SystematicReview articles. Want a topic review that will completely plausibly support your controversial viewpoint? Say, you want to support raw milk or decry #vaccination ?

    blog.bgcarlisle.com/2025/05/16

  15. From June 2025:

    I don't trust large language model (#LLM) AIs: They're trained to sound plausible without regard for accuracy, ie, generate bullshit.

    If you can handle that "spicy" description, please read this essay by @researchfairy, describing how LLMs can be used to deliberately weaponize #SystematicReview articles. Want a topic review that will completely plausibly support your controversial viewpoint? Say, you want to support raw milk or decry #vaccination ?

    blog.bgcarlisle.com/2025/05/16

  16. From June 2025:

    I don't trust large language model (#LLM) AIs: They're trained to sound plausible without regard for accuracy, ie, generate bullshit.

    If you can handle that "spicy" description, please read this essay by @researchfairy, describing how LLMs can be used to deliberately weaponize #SystematicReview articles. Want a topic review that will completely plausibly support your controversial viewpoint? Say, you want to support raw milk or decry #vaccination ?

    blog.bgcarlisle.com/2025/05/16

  17. Thrilled to announce that @shreyadimri and I will be part of #LoveMethods26! 🎉

    We'll be running a session on "How to avoid common problems when doing a #systematicReview and #MetaAnalysis", sharing practical tips for conducting reproducible & transparent evidence syntheses

    Love Methods Week (January 19–23, 2026) is a FREE online event where researchers come together to learn & share open, reusable methods. There's something for everyone!

    👉 Full details & registration: excelscior.uc.pt/love-methods-

  18. Thrilled to announce that @shreyadimri and I will be part of #LoveMethods26! 🎉

    We'll be running a session on "How to avoid common problems when doing a #systematicReview and #MetaAnalysis", sharing practical tips for conducting reproducible & transparent evidence syntheses

    Love Methods Week (January 19–23, 2026) is a FREE online event where researchers come together to learn & share open, reusable methods. There's something for everyone!

    👉 Full details & registration: excelscior.uc.pt/love-methods-

  19. Thrilled to announce that @shreyadimri and I will be part of #LoveMethods26! 🎉

    We'll be running a session on "How to avoid common problems when doing a #systematicReview and #MetaAnalysis", sharing practical tips for conducting reproducible & transparent evidence syntheses

    Love Methods Week (January 19–23, 2026) is a FREE online event where researchers come together to learn & share open, reusable methods. There's something for everyone!

    👉 Full details & registration: excelscior.uc.pt/love-methods-

  20. Thrilled to announce that @shreyadimri and I will be part of #LoveMethods26! 🎉

    We'll be running a session on "How to avoid common problems when doing a #systematicReview and #MetaAnalysis", sharing practical tips for conducting reproducible & transparent evidence syntheses

    Love Methods Week (January 19–23, 2026) is a FREE online event where researchers come together to learn & share open, reusable methods. There's something for everyone!

    👉 Full details & registration: excelscior.uc.pt/love-methods-

  21. Thrilled to announce that @shreyadimri and I will be part of #LoveMethods26! 🎉

    We'll be running a session on "How to avoid common problems when doing a #systematicReview and #MetaAnalysis", sharing practical tips for conducting reproducible & transparent evidence syntheses

    Love Methods Week (January 19–23, 2026) is a FREE online event where researchers come together to learn & share open, reusable methods. There's something for everyone!

    👉 Full details & registration: excelscior.uc.pt/love-methods-

  22. europesays.com/ie/192801/ Attrition rate of antiretroviral therapy and its influencing factors among Chinese people living with HIV/AIDS: a meta-analysis and system review | AIDS Research and Therapy #AntiretroviralTherapy #Attrition #Éire #Health #HIV/AIDS #IE #InfectiousDiseases #Ireland #MetaAnalysis #SystematicReview #Virology

  23. Congratulations to Sophie Hascher for the publication of her study titled "Systematic Literature Review on Psychological Treatment Methods for Substance use Disorder and Food Addiction" that has been published online today: doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-015

    #substanceusedisorders #suds #foodaddiction #systematicreview

  24. Congratulations to Sophie Hascher for the publication of her study titled "Systematic Literature Review on Psychological Treatment Methods for Substance use Disorder and Food Addiction" that has been published online today: doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-015

    #substanceusedisorders #suds #foodaddiction #systematicreview

  25. Congratulations to Sophie Hascher for the publication of her study titled "Systematic Literature Review on Psychological Treatment Methods for Substance use Disorder and Food Addiction" that has been published online today: doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-015

    #substanceusedisorders #suds #foodaddiction #systematicreview

  26. Congratulations to Sophie Hascher for the publication of her study titled "Systematic Literature Review on Psychological Treatment Methods for Substance use Disorder and Food Addiction" that has been published online today: doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-015

    #substanceusedisorders #suds #foodaddiction #systematicreview

  27. Congratulations to Sophie Hascher for the publication of her study titled "Systematic Literature Review on Psychological Treatment Methods for Substance use Disorder and Food Addiction" that has been published online today: doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-015

    #substanceusedisorders #suds #foodaddiction #systematicreview

  28. Another #PeerReview done.

    Manuscript c3,000 words
    Review c2,300 words
    2hrs 45min

    This was overall enjoyable as it was a paper about two methods I use frequently as well as in a content area I work in. Looked up some new papers. Got time to think about stuff I work on.

    One key point: one needs to be clear about the type of review one is doing and why this is the most appropriate way for the research question.

    bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentra

    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10

    #SystematicReview #ScopingReview

  29. Another #PeerReview done.

    Manuscript c3,000 words
    Review c2,300 words
    2hrs 45min

    This was overall enjoyable as it was a paper about two methods I use frequently as well as in a content area I work in. Looked up some new papers. Got time to think about stuff I work on.

    One key point: one needs to be clear about the type of review one is doing and why this is the most appropriate way for the research question.

    bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentra

    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10

    #SystematicReview #ScopingReview

  30. Another #PeerReview done.

    Manuscript c3,000 words
    Review c2,300 words
    2hrs 45min

    This was overall enjoyable as it was a paper about two methods I use frequently as well as in a content area I work in. Looked up some new papers. Got time to think about stuff I work on.

    One key point: one needs to be clear about the type of review one is doing and why this is the most appropriate way for the research question.

    bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentra

    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10

    #SystematicReview #ScopingReview

  31. Another #PeerReview done.

    Manuscript c3,000 words
    Review c2,300 words
    2hrs 45min

    This was overall enjoyable as it was a paper about two methods I use frequently as well as in a content area I work in. Looked up some new papers. Got time to think about stuff I work on.

    One key point: one needs to be clear about the type of review one is doing and why this is the most appropriate way for the research question.

    bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentra

    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10

    #SystematicReview #ScopingReview

  32. Digital technology integration in home-based exercise: a systematic review of research evolution, applications, and impact mechanisms | BMC Public Health

    Ai X, Yang J, Lin Z, Wan X. Mental health and th…
    #NewsBeep #News #Technology #AU #Australia #Bibliometric #Biostatistics #digitalhealth #DigitalTechnology #EnvironmentalHealth #epidemiology #general #Home-basedexercise #Medicine/PublicHealth #publichealth #Publichealthintervention #Systematicreview #Vaccine
    newsbeep.com/au/220418/

  33. Busy week, I have not much posted from #RSS2025. This will follow in the next days.

    For now, I enjoyed chatting with Robert Grant and am reading his co-authored book "Bayesian #MetaAnalysis" which he kindly gave me a copy of 🙇
    robertgrantstats.co.uk/bma-boo

    I am always looking combinations of unusual and cross-cutting themes for teaching/ training, so I'll do a parallel read with #MixtureModels in this area: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1

    #SysReview #SystematicReview #Bayes

  34. Busy week, I have not much posted from #RSS2025. This will follow in the next days.

    For now, I enjoyed chatting with Robert Grant and am reading his co-authored book "Bayesian #MetaAnalysis" which he kindly gave me a copy of 🙇
    robertgrantstats.co.uk/bma-boo

    I am always looking combinations of unusual and cross-cutting themes for teaching/ training, so I'll do a parallel read with #MixtureModels in this area: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1

    #SysReview #SystematicReview #Bayes

  35. Busy week, I have not much posted from #RSS2025. This will follow in the next days.

    For now, I enjoyed chatting with Robert Grant and am reading his co-authored book "Bayesian #MetaAnalysis" which he kindly gave me a copy of 🙇
    robertgrantstats.co.uk/bma-boo

    I am always looking combinations of unusual and cross-cutting themes for teaching/ training, so I'll do a parallel read with #MixtureModels in this area: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1

    #SysReview #SystematicReview #Bayes

  36. Busy week, I have not much posted from #RSS2025. This will follow in the next days.

    For now, I enjoyed chatting with Robert Grant and am reading his co-authored book "Bayesian #MetaAnalysis" which he kindly gave me a copy of 🙇
    robertgrantstats.co.uk/bma-boo

    I am always looking combinations of unusual and cross-cutting themes for teaching/ training, so I'll do a parallel read with #MixtureModels in this area: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1

    #SysReview #SystematicReview #Bayes

  37. Busy week, I have not much posted from #RSS2025. This will follow in the next days.

    For now, I enjoyed chatting with Robert Grant and am reading his co-authored book "Bayesian #MetaAnalysis" which he kindly gave me a copy of 🙇
    robertgrantstats.co.uk/bma-boo

    I am always looking combinations of unusual and cross-cutting themes for teaching/ training, so I'll do a parallel read with #MixtureModels in this area: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1

    #SysReview #SystematicReview #Bayes