#peerreviewing — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #peerreviewing, aggregated by home.social.
-
I am sick and tired of journals sending manuscripts for review where the text is separated from the figures which are separated from their legend. There is absolutely no justification for this layout. I think I'll refuse to review one more manuscript presented like this.
-
I am sick and tired of journals sending manuscripts for review where the text is separated from the figures which are separated from their legend. There is absolutely no justification for this layout. I think I'll refuse to review one more manuscript presented like this.
-
I am sick and tired of journals sending manuscripts for review where the text is separated from the figures which are separated from their legend. There is absolutely no justification for this layout. I think I'll refuse to review one more manuscript presented like this.
-
I am sick and tired of journals sending manuscripts for review where the text is separated from the figures which are separated from their legend. There is absolutely no justification for this layout. I think I'll refuse to review one more manuscript presented like this.
-
I am sick and tired of journals sending manuscripts for review where the text is separated from the figures which are separated from their legend. There is absolutely no justification for this layout. I think I'll refuse to review one more manuscript presented like this.
-
📰 La revue @Nature étend à tous les domaines scientifiques la possibilité de publier des #RegisteredReports (un modèle qui consiste à soumettre à l’#EvaluationParLesPairs 🧑🔬 🧪 un #ProtocoleDeRecherche avant que les données ne soient recueillies )
#IntégritéScientifique, #Transparence, #PeerReviewing -
📰 La revue @Nature étend à tous les domaines scientifiques la possibilité de publier des #RegisteredReports (un modèle qui consiste à soumettre à l’#EvaluationParLesPairs 🧑🔬 🧪 un #ProtocoleDeRecherche avant que les données ne soient recueillies )
#IntégritéScientifique, #Transparence, #PeerReviewing -
📰 La revue @Nature étend à tous les domaines scientifiques la possibilité de publier des #RegisteredReports (un modèle qui consiste à soumettre à l’#EvaluationParLesPairs 🧑🔬 🧪 un #ProtocoleDeRecherche avant que les données ne soient recueillies )
#IntégritéScientifique, #Transparence, #PeerReviewing -
📰 La revue @Nature étend à tous les domaines scientifiques la possibilité de publier des #RegisteredReports (un modèle qui consiste à soumettre à l’#EvaluationParLesPairs 🧑🔬 🧪 un #ProtocoleDeRecherche avant que les données ne soient recueillies )
#IntégritéScientifique, #Transparence, #PeerReviewing -
In case you missed it, last November a vulnerability in OpenReview led to a #dataleak of 10,000 confidential submissions to the International Conference on Learning and Representation (ICLR).
Leaked data included detailed reviewer information and no-longer-anonymous reviews.
-
In case you missed it, last November a vulnerability in OpenReview led to a #dataleak of 10,000 confidential submissions to the International Conference on Learning and Representation (ICLR).
Leaked data included detailed reviewer information and no-longer-anonymous reviews.
-
In case you missed it, last November a vulnerability in OpenReview led to a #dataleak of 10,000 confidential submissions to the International Conference on Learning and Representation (ICLR).
Leaked data included detailed reviewer information and no-longer-anonymous reviews.
-
In case you missed it, last November a vulnerability in OpenReview led to a #dataleak of 10,000 confidential submissions to the International Conference on Learning and Representation (ICLR).
Leaked data included detailed reviewer information and no-longer-anonymous reviews.
-
In case you missed it, last November a vulnerability in OpenReview led to a #dataleak of 10,000 confidential submissions to the International Conference on Learning and Representation (ICLR).
Leaked data included detailed reviewer information and no-longer-anonymous reviews.
-
#VeilleIST
Publications scientifiques : un process de #peerreviewing plus long pour les auteurs femmes que hommes ?
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003574
S'intéressant aux facteurs de la sous-représentation académique des femmes (et des obstacles rencontrés), diverses études se sont intéressées aux publi et aux possibles biais du système de peerreview.
En économie, diverses études ont pointé une durée de peer-reviewing allongée pour les femmes. D'autres non. Cet article propose de documenter la situation en sciences de la vie / biomed (qui représente plus 1/3 des publis dans le monde) à partir de la base Pubmed. -
#VeilleIST
Publications scientifiques : un process de #peerreviewing plus long pour les auteurs femmes que hommes ?
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003574
S'intéressant aux facteurs de la sous-représentation académique des femmes (et des obstacles rencontrés), diverses études se sont intéressées aux publi et aux possibles biais du système de peerreview.
En économie, diverses études ont pointé une durée de peer-reviewing allongée pour les femmes. D'autres non. Cet article propose de documenter la situation en sciences de la vie / biomed (qui représente plus 1/3 des publis dans le monde) à partir de la base Pubmed. -
The Guardian describes the process of getting #published in #science #journals as #broken: In 2020 alone, #academics globally spent >100 million hours #PeerReviewing journal papers. In the US, that time spent amounted to >$1.5 billion of free labor." https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jul/13/quality-of-scientific-papers-questioned-as-academics-overwhelmed-by-the-millions-published (1/2)
-
The Guardian describes the process of getting #published in #science #journals as #broken: In 2020 alone, #academics globally spent >100 million hours #PeerReviewing journal papers. In the US, that time spent amounted to >$1.5 billion of free labor." https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jul/13/quality-of-scientific-papers-questioned-as-academics-overwhelmed-by-the-millions-published (1/2)
-
The Guardian describes the process of getting #published in #science #journals as #broken: In 2020 alone, #academics globally spent >100 million hours #PeerReviewing journal papers. In the US, that time spent amounted to >$1.5 billion of free labor." https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jul/13/quality-of-scientific-papers-questioned-as-academics-overwhelmed-by-the-millions-published (1/2)
-
The Guardian describes the process of getting #published in #science #journals as #broken: In 2020 alone, #academics globally spent >100 million hours #PeerReviewing journal papers. In the US, that time spent amounted to >$1.5 billion of free labor." https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jul/13/quality-of-scientific-papers-questioned-as-academics-overwhelmed-by-the-millions-published (1/2)
-
The Guardian describes the process of getting #published in #science #journals as #broken: In 2020 alone, #academics globally spent >100 million hours #PeerReviewing journal papers. In the US, that time spent amounted to >$1.5 billion of free labor." https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jul/13/quality-of-scientific-papers-questioned-as-academics-overwhelmed-by-the-millions-published (1/2)
-
Frontiers introduces FAIR² Data Management - Research Information
L'éditeur scientifique Fontiers lance le #peerreviewing par l'#AI #artificialintelligence avec son service FAIR² Data Management
https://www.researchinformation.info/news/frontiers-introduces-fair%C2%B2-data-management/ -
Frontiers introduces FAIR² Data Management - Research Information
L'éditeur scientifique Fontiers lance le #peerreviewing par l'#AI #artificialintelligence avec son service FAIR² Data Management
https://www.researchinformation.info/news/frontiers-introduces-fair%C2%B2-data-management/ -
Frontiers introduces FAIR² Data Management - Research Information
L'éditeur scientifique Fontiers lance le #peerreviewing par l'#AI #artificialintelligence avec son service FAIR² Data Management
https://www.researchinformation.info/news/frontiers-introduces-fair%C2%B2-data-management/ -
Frontiers introduces FAIR² Data Management - Research Information
L'éditeur scientifique Fontiers lance le #peerreviewing par l'#AI #artificialintelligence avec son service FAIR² Data Management
https://www.researchinformation.info/news/frontiers-introduces-fair%C2%B2-data-management/ -
Deux des fondateurs de #PeerCommunityIn, Denis Bourguet et Thomas Guillemaud, plaident pour des décisions claires d’acceptation ou de rejet des #Préprints peer-reviewés car ⚠️ #PeerReviewing et Curation ne sont pas nécessairement des validations
➡️ https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/peer-reviewed-preprints-and-the-publish-review-curate-model/
-
Deux des fondateurs de #PeerCommunityIn, Denis Bourguet et Thomas Guillemaud, plaident pour des décisions claires d’acceptation ou de rejet des #Préprints peer-reviewés car ⚠️ #PeerReviewing et Curation ne sont pas nécessairement des validations
➡️ https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/peer-reviewed-preprints-and-the-publish-review-curate-model/
-
Deux des fondateurs de #PeerCommunityIn, Denis Bourguet et Thomas Guillemaud, plaident pour des décisions claires d’acceptation ou de rejet des #Préprints peer-reviewés car ⚠️ #PeerReviewing et Curation ne sont pas nécessairement des validations
➡️ https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/peer-reviewed-preprints-and-the-publish-review-curate-model/
-
Deux des fondateurs de #PeerCommunityIn, Denis Bourguet et Thomas Guillemaud, plaident pour des décisions claires d’acceptation ou de rejet des #Préprints peer-reviewés car ⚠️ #PeerReviewing et Curation ne sont pas nécessairement des validations
➡️ https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/peer-reviewed-preprints-and-the-publish-review-curate-model/
-
#Vanity Journals, Conflicts of Interest, and the Quest for #Research #Integrity
👉 "November 2024 has been another intriguing month for the forensic #scientometrics community. A particular gem of a sentence from a paper in the 'International Journal of Hydrogen Energy’ has been making the rounds on social media and PubPeer, prompting lively discussions."
https://fosci.substack.com/p/vanity-journals-conflicts-of-interest
#VanityJournals #journals #publishing #academicpublishing #ScholComm #ethics #Elsevier #science #peerreviewing
-
#Vanity Journals, Conflicts of Interest, and the Quest for #Research #Integrity
👉 "November 2024 has been another intriguing month for the forensic #scientometrics community. A particular gem of a sentence from a paper in the 'International Journal of Hydrogen Energy’ has been making the rounds on social media and PubPeer, prompting lively discussions."
https://fosci.substack.com/p/vanity-journals-conflicts-of-interest
#VanityJournals #journals #publishing #academicpublishing #ScholComm #ethics #Elsevier #science #peerreviewing
-
#Vanity Journals, Conflicts of Interest, and the Quest for #Research #Integrity
👉 "November 2024 has been another intriguing month for the forensic #scientometrics community. A particular gem of a sentence from a paper in the 'International Journal of Hydrogen Energy’ has been making the rounds on social media and PubPeer, prompting lively discussions."
https://fosci.substack.com/p/vanity-journals-conflicts-of-interest
#VanityJournals #journals #publishing #academicpublishing #ScholComm #ethics #Elsevier #science #peerreviewing
-
#Vanity Journals, Conflicts of Interest, and the Quest for #Research #Integrity
👉 "November 2024 has been another intriguing month for the forensic #scientometrics community. A particular gem of a sentence from a paper in the 'International Journal of Hydrogen Energy’ has been making the rounds on social media and PubPeer, prompting lively discussions."
https://fosci.substack.com/p/vanity-journals-conflicts-of-interest
#VanityJournals #journals #publishing #academicpublishing #ScholComm #ethics #Elsevier #science #peerreviewing
-
#Vanity Journals, Conflicts of Interest, and the Quest for #Research #Integrity
👉 "November 2024 has been another intriguing month for the forensic #scientometrics community. A particular gem of a sentence from a paper in the 'International Journal of Hydrogen Energy’ has been making the rounds on social media and PubPeer, prompting lively discussions."
https://fosci.substack.com/p/vanity-journals-conflicts-of-interest
#VanityJournals #journals #publishing #academicpublishing #ScholComm #ethics #Elsevier #science #peerreviewing
-
[Report] rapport MIT- NSF sur l' #openaccess côté #USA “Access to Science & Scholarship 2024: Building an Evidence Base to Support the Future of Open Research Policy” => https://mitpress.mit.edu/the-mit-press-releases-report-on-the-future-of-open-access-publishing-and-policy/
#openscience #impact #policies #science #peerreviewing #datasharing #infrastructures -
[Report] rapport MIT- NSF sur l' #openaccess côté #USA “Access to Science & Scholarship 2024: Building an Evidence Base to Support the Future of Open Research Policy” => https://mitpress.mit.edu/the-mit-press-releases-report-on-the-future-of-open-access-publishing-and-policy/
#openscience #impact #policies #science #peerreviewing #datasharing #infrastructures -
[Report] rapport MIT- NSF sur l' #openaccess côté #USA “Access to Science & Scholarship 2024: Building an Evidence Base to Support the Future of Open Research Policy” => https://mitpress.mit.edu/the-mit-press-releases-report-on-the-future-of-open-access-publishing-and-policy/
#openscience #impact #policies #science #peerreviewing #datasharing #infrastructures -
[Report] rapport MIT- NSF sur l' #openaccess côté #USA “Access to Science & Scholarship 2024: Building an Evidence Base to Support the Future of Open Research Policy” => https://mitpress.mit.edu/the-mit-press-releases-report-on-the-future-of-open-access-publishing-and-policy/
#openscience #impact #policies #science #peerreviewing #datasharing #infrastructures -
BishopBlog: Using PubPeer to screen editors
Utiliser @PubPeer pour surveiller les #editeurs #publishers #postpublication #peerreviewing
https://deevybee.blogspot.com/2024/09/using-pubpeer-to-screen-editors.html?m=1 -
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: A Comprehensive SWOT Analysis of AI and Human Expertise in Peer Review - The Scholarly Kitchen
Réflexion sur l'interaction #peerreviewing #peerreviewer et #ai #artificialinteligence
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/09/12/strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-and-threats-a-comprehensive-swot-analysis-of-ai-and-human-expertise-in-peer-review/ -
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: A Comprehensive SWOT Analysis of AI and Human Expertise in Peer Review - The Scholarly Kitchen
Réflexion sur l'interaction #peerreviewing #peerreviewer et #ai #artificialinteligence
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/09/12/strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-and-threats-a-comprehensive-swot-analysis-of-ai-and-human-expertise-in-peer-review/ -
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: A Comprehensive SWOT Analysis of AI and Human Expertise in Peer Review - The Scholarly Kitchen
Réflexion sur l'interaction #peerreviewing #peerreviewer et #ai #artificialinteligence
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/09/12/strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-and-threats-a-comprehensive-swot-analysis-of-ai-and-human-expertise-in-peer-review/ -
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: A Comprehensive SWOT Analysis of AI and Human Expertise in Peer Review - The Scholarly Kitchen
Réflexion sur l'interaction #peerreviewing #peerreviewer et #ai #artificialinteligence
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/09/12/strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-and-threats-a-comprehensive-swot-analysis-of-ai-and-human-expertise-in-peer-review/ -
Talking about #arXiv #bioRxiv, one weakness is that there is no "flag" to indicate whether PDF is a #preprint or the post- #peerReview #postprint. I am surprised at the lack of attention on this.
Although I have my reservations on the quality of #peerReviewing in general, I believe it should be a point of attention of an institutional archive to make sure the file is post-peer review, or, if that version is under paywall only (which is a problem), state it at least.
-
Talking about #arXiv #bioRxiv, one weakness is that there is no "flag" to indicate whether PDF is a #preprint or the post- #peerReview #postprint. I am surprised at the lack of attention on this.
Although I have my reservations on the quality of #peerReviewing in general, I believe it should be a point of attention of an institutional archive to make sure the file is post-peer review, or, if that version is under paywall only (which is a problem), state it at least.
-
Talking about #arXiv #bioRxiv, one weakness is that there is no "flag" to indicate whether PDF is a #preprint or the post- #peerReview #postprint. I am surprised at the lack of attention on this.
Although I have my reservations on the quality of #peerReviewing in general, I believe it should be a point of attention of an institutional archive to make sure the file is post-peer review, or, if that version is under paywall only (which is a problem), state it at least.
-
Talking about #arXiv #bioRxiv, one weakness is that there is no "flag" to indicate whether PDF is a #preprint or the post- #peerReview #postprint. I am surprised at the lack of attention on this.
Although I have my reservations on the quality of #peerReviewing in general, I believe it should be a point of attention of an institutional archive to make sure the file is post-peer review, or, if that version is under paywall only (which is a problem), state it at least.
-
Talking about #arXiv #bioRxiv, one weakness is that there is no "flag" to indicate whether PDF is a #preprint or the post- #peerReview #postprint. I am surprised at the lack of attention on this.
Although I have my reservations on the quality of #peerReviewing in general, I believe it should be a point of attention of an institutional archive to make sure the file is post-peer review, or, if that version is under paywall only (which is a problem), state it at least.
-
“It is becoming increasingly difficult to find reviewers”—myths and facts about #peerreview
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00359-023-01642-w -
“It is becoming increasingly difficult to find reviewers”—myths and facts about #peerreview
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00359-023-01642-w -
“It is becoming increasingly difficult to find reviewers”—myths and facts about #peerreview
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00359-023-01642-w -
“It is becoming increasingly difficult to find reviewers”—myths and facts about #peerreview
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00359-023-01642-w -
Le #peerreviewing en péril ?
1 millions d'articles en 1990, 3 millions en 2016 = 15 000 ans d'ETP de peer-review
Baisse du taux d'acceptation
Pré carré de vieux mâles blancs
Activité pas prise en compte par les organismes de recherche dans l'évaluation
https://www.redactionmedicale.fr/2023/02/le-peer-review-en-peril-comment-le-sauver-impossible -
Prolific #autism researcher has two dozen papers retracted
👉 An autism researcher lost two dozen papers to #retraction 8 years after the publisher was made aware of potentially troubling editorial practices. #Elsevier cited undisclosed conflicts of interest, duplicated methodology and a “compromised” #peerreview process as reasons for the #retractions.
https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/prolific-autism-researcher-has-two-dozen-papers-retracted/
#peerreviewing #research #science #ethics #Publishing #selfcitation #metrics
-
Prolific #autism researcher has two dozen papers retracted
👉 An autism researcher lost two dozen papers to #retraction 8 years after the publisher was made aware of potentially troubling editorial practices. #Elsevier cited undisclosed conflicts of interest, duplicated methodology and a “compromised” #peerreview process as reasons for the #retractions.
https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/prolific-autism-researcher-has-two-dozen-papers-retracted/
#peerreviewing #research #science #ethics #Publishing #selfcitation #metrics