#ourworldindata — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #ourworldindata, aggregated by home.social.
-
@Elizafox Yes thanks for reminding, some things got better. As Max Roser puts it: "The world is awful. The world is much better. The world can be much better.
It is wrong to think these three statements contradict each other. We need to see that they are all true to see that a better world is possible."
https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better
#owid #ourworldindata -
@Elizafox Yes thanks for reminding, some things got better. As Max Roser puts it: "The world is awful. The world is much better. The world can be much better.
It is wrong to think these three statements contradict each other. We need to see that they are all true to see that a better world is possible."
https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better
#owid #ourworldindata -
“I’m proud to be a supporter of Our World in Data! Their team builds a public resource, free for everyone, that makes the research and data on the world’s largest problems easier to access and understand. You can donate here:https://ourworldindata.org/donate”
-
“I’m proud to be a supporter of Our World in Data! Their team builds a public resource, free for everyone, that makes the research and data on the world’s largest problems easier to access and understand. You can donate here:https://ourworldindata.org/donate”
-
#OurWorldInData #statistics #datavisualization #population #demography
Annual population growth rate
-
#OurWorldInData #statistics #datavisualization #population #demography
Annual population growth rate
-
Today's fact from #OurWorldInData: “Global sales of combustion engine cars peaked in 2017”
https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/global-sales-of-combustion-engine-cars-have-peaked
#cars #electrification #ClimateChange #diesel #petrol #PeakOil #transport
-
Today's fact from #OurWorldInData: “Global sales of combustion engine cars peaked in 2017”
https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/global-sales-of-combustion-engine-cars-have-peaked
#cars #electrification #ClimateChange #diesel #petrol #PeakOil #transport
-
#GoodNews taken from Hank Green's newsletter:
Cereal yields in Ghana have increased much faster over the past decadehttps://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/cereal-yields-in-ghana-have-increased-much-faster-over-the-past-decade
#OurWorldInData -
#GoodNews taken from Hank Green's newsletter:
Cereal yields in Ghana have increased much faster over the past decadehttps://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/cereal-yields-in-ghana-have-increased-much-faster-over-the-past-decade
#OurWorldInData -
Today's fact from the #RSS feed of #OurWorldInData: Argentina was one of the richest countries in the world at the beginning of the 20th century.
I might use this in the future when responding to people who claim that “things can't get any worse”.
-
Today's fact from the #RSS feed of #OurWorldInData: Argentina was one of the richest countries in the world at the beginning of the 20th century.
I might use this in the future when responding to people who claim that “things can't get any worse”.
-
Three ways to look at cancer mortality.
"The same underlying data gives us three different pictures. The absolute number of deaths is up; the crude rate is up slightly; the age-standardized rate is down. None of these are inaccurate, but they answer different questions."
More information on how to look at this graph at [ https://ourworldindata.org/age-standardization ]
-
Three ways to look at cancer mortality.
"The same underlying data gives us three different pictures. The absolute number of deaths is up; the crude rate is up slightly; the age-standardized rate is down. None of these are inaccurate, but they answer different questions."
More information on how to look at this graph at [ https://ourworldindata.org/age-standardization ]
-
-
-
For #TidyTuesday I plotted the sheep population and census data from #OUrWorldinData. They better hope the sheep don't rise up. #rstats #dataviz
p.s. I could not get a @ symbol in my caption without some special text (!?)
Code:https://codeberg.org/svanhorne/TidyTuesday/src/branch/main/2026/NewZealand.r
-
For #TidyTuesday I plotted the sheep population and census data from #OUrWorldinData. They better hope the sheep don't rise up. #rstats #dataviz
p.s. I could not get a @ symbol in my caption without some special text (!?)
Code:https://codeberg.org/svanhorne/TidyTuesday/src/branch/main/2026/NewZealand.r
-
Today #Wikipedia turns 25 years. Let's appreciate this monumental project of open knowledge and international collaboration!
Without open knowledge, data and transparency we cannot see uncomfortable facts and where humanity needs to act.
I wanted to see if there are any countries at all with a median age below 25. Turns out, there aren't just a few.
-
Today #Wikipedia turns 25 years. Let's appreciate this monumental project of open knowledge and international collaboration!
Without open knowledge, data and transparency we cannot see uncomfortable facts and where humanity needs to act.
I wanted to see if there are any countries at all with a median age below 25. Turns out, there aren't just a few.
-
“Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God”*…
From the piece featured below: “GDP per capita in Madagascar is about the same today as it was in 1950. As a consequence, the number of people in extreme poverty increased in line with the country’s population growth” (image source)It’s easy to feel hope in the advances that the world has made in eraditcating extreme poverty over the last several decades. But as Max Roser writes, unless the poorest economies start growing, this period of progress against the worst form of poverty is over…
In the last decades, the world has made fantastic progress against extreme poverty. In 1990, 2.3 billion people lived in extreme poverty. Since then, the number of extremely poor people has declined by 1.5 billion people.
This means on any average day in the last 35 years, about 115,000 people left extreme poverty behind.1 Leaving the very worst poverty behind doesn’t mean a life free of want, but it does mean a big change. Additional income matters most for those who have the least. It means having the chance to leave hunger behind, to gain access to clean water, to access better healthcare, and to have at least some electricity — for light at night and perhaps even to cook and heat.
Can we expect this rapid progress to continue?
Unfortunately, we cannot. Based on current trends, progress against extreme poverty will come to a halt. As we’ll see, the number of people in extreme poverty is projected to decline, from 831 million people in 2025 to 793 million people in 2030. After 2030, the number of extremely poor people is expected to increase.
To understand why the rapid progress against deep poverty will not continue into the future, we need to know why the world made progress in the past.
Extreme poverty declined in the last three decades because, back in the 1990s, the majority of the poorest people on the planet lived in countries that subsequently achieved very fast economic growth. In Indonesia and China, more than two-thirds of the population lived in extreme poverty. But these economies then grew rapidly, so that by today, the share has declined to less than 10%. Other large Asian countries — including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and the Philippines — also achieved strong growth, and as a consequence, the share living in extreme poverty declined rapidly. Much of the progress happened in Asia, but conditions in other regions improved too: the share living in extreme poverty also declined in Ghana, Cape Verde, Cameroon, Panama, Bolivia, Mexico, Brazil, and many other countries.
This chart shows the economic change in these countries over the past decades. As incomes increased, the share of people in extreme poverty declined.
Share of population living in extreme poverty vs. GDP per capita, 1990 to 2024 (World Bank, Eurostat, OECD, IMF)What is different today is that the majority of the world’s poorest people are stuck in economies that have been stagnating for a long time.Consider the case of Madagascar. In the long run, the country has not seen any growth at all: GDP per capita in Madagascar is about the same today as it was in 1950. As a consequence, the number of people in extreme poverty increased in line with the country’s population growth. In richer countries, it is possible to reduce poverty by reducing inequality through redistribution, but a country like Madagascar cannot reduce its share of people in extreme poverty through redistribution. This is because the mean income is lower than the poverty line; if everyone had the same income, everyone would be living in extreme poverty.
The situation is similar in other countries, as the chart below shows: in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Mozambique, Malawi, Burundi, and the Central African Republic, more than half of the population lives in extreme poverty. As their economies have stagnated, the deep poverty that most people live in has remained largely unchanged for decades.
This is why we have to expect the end of progress against extreme poverty based on current trends. If the poorest economies remain stagnant, hundreds of millions of people will continue to live in extreme poverty.
Share of population living in extreme poverty, 1992-2022 (World Bank)I’m always skeptical when people say that we are at a juncture in history where the future looks much different than the past. But when it comes to the fight against extreme poverty, I fear it is true. Today, the majority of the world’s poorest people are living in economies that have not achieved economic growth in the recent past… Based on current trends, we have to expect the end of progress against extreme poverty…
… It’s no news that we should expect an end to progress against extreme poverty. This article is an update of an article I published in 2019, in which I wrote the same: the fact that the poorest economies are not growing means that the rapid progress against extreme poverty seen in the last decades will end.
Although this prospect has been known for years, it has hardly received the attention it deserves. Progress against extreme poverty was one of humanity’s most outstanding achievements of the past decades — the end of it would be one of the very worst realities of the coming ones.
Importantly, however, these projections are not predictions; their purpose is not to describe what the world in 2030 or 2040 will certainly look like. These projections describe what we have to expect based on current trends; they tell us about our present world rather than the reality of tomorrow. Current trends don’t have to become future facts: many countries left extreme poverty behind in the past, because they had a moment at which they broke out of stagnation.
What these projections tell us, however, is that if the poorest countries do not start to grow, a very bleak future is ahead of us: a future in which extreme poverty remains the reality for hundreds of millions for many years to come…
Eminently worth reading in full– and acting on: “The end of progress against extreme poverty?” from @maxroser.bsky.social and @ourworldindata.org.
* Proverbs 14:31, NIV
###
As we put our shoulders to the wheel, we might spare a thought for a man who contributed mightily to our capacity to feed humanity, Kenneth V. Thimann; he died on this date in 1997. A microbiologist, he was a pioneer in plant physiology (especially the hormones that control the development of plants). Building on the thinking of Frits Went, he identified the first plant hormone to be discovered– the first auxin, a class of growth hormones, and revealed its chemical structure– which proved very important to agriculture and its yields.
#agriculture #auxin #culture #demographics #growthHormones #history #KennethThimann #KennethVThimann #microbiology #OurWorldInData #plantPhysiology #plants #politics #poverty -
“Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God”*…
From the piece featured below: “GDP per capita in Madagascar is about the same today as it was in 1950. As a consequence, the number of people in extreme poverty increased in line with the country’s population growth” (image source)It’s easy to feel hope in the advances that the world has made in eraditcating extreme poverty over the last several decades. But as Max Roser writes, unless the poorest economies start growing, this period of progress against the worst form of poverty is over…
In the last decades, the world has made fantastic progress against extreme poverty. In 1990, 2.3 billion people lived in extreme poverty. Since then, the number of extremely poor people has declined by 1.5 billion people.
This means on any average day in the last 35 years, about 115,000 people left extreme poverty behind.1 Leaving the very worst poverty behind doesn’t mean a life free of want, but it does mean a big change. Additional income matters most for those who have the least. It means having the chance to leave hunger behind, to gain access to clean water, to access better healthcare, and to have at least some electricity — for light at night and perhaps even to cook and heat.
Can we expect this rapid progress to continue?
Unfortunately, we cannot. Based on current trends, progress against extreme poverty will come to a halt. As we’ll see, the number of people in extreme poverty is projected to decline, from 831 million people in 2025 to 793 million people in 2030. After 2030, the number of extremely poor people is expected to increase.
To understand why the rapid progress against deep poverty will not continue into the future, we need to know why the world made progress in the past.
Extreme poverty declined in the last three decades because, back in the 1990s, the majority of the poorest people on the planet lived in countries that subsequently achieved very fast economic growth. In Indonesia and China, more than two-thirds of the population lived in extreme poverty. But these economies then grew rapidly, so that by today, the share has declined to less than 10%. Other large Asian countries — including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and the Philippines — also achieved strong growth, and as a consequence, the share living in extreme poverty declined rapidly. Much of the progress happened in Asia, but conditions in other regions improved too: the share living in extreme poverty also declined in Ghana, Cape Verde, Cameroon, Panama, Bolivia, Mexico, Brazil, and many other countries.
This chart shows the economic change in these countries over the past decades. As incomes increased, the share of people in extreme poverty declined.
Share of population living in extreme poverty vs. GDP per capita, 1990 to 2024 (World Bank, Eurostat, OECD, IMF)What is different today is that the majority of the world’s poorest people are stuck in economies that have been stagnating for a long time.Consider the case of Madagascar. In the long run, the country has not seen any growth at all: GDP per capita in Madagascar is about the same today as it was in 1950. As a consequence, the number of people in extreme poverty increased in line with the country’s population growth. In richer countries, it is possible to reduce poverty by reducing inequality through redistribution, but a country like Madagascar cannot reduce its share of people in extreme poverty through redistribution. This is because the mean income is lower than the poverty line; if everyone had the same income, everyone would be living in extreme poverty.
The situation is similar in other countries, as the chart below shows: in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Mozambique, Malawi, Burundi, and the Central African Republic, more than half of the population lives in extreme poverty. As their economies have stagnated, the deep poverty that most people live in has remained largely unchanged for decades.
This is why we have to expect the end of progress against extreme poverty based on current trends. If the poorest economies remain stagnant, hundreds of millions of people will continue to live in extreme poverty.
Share of population living in extreme poverty, 1992-2022 (World Bank)I’m always skeptical when people say that we are at a juncture in history where the future looks much different than the past. But when it comes to the fight against extreme poverty, I fear it is true. Today, the majority of the world’s poorest people are living in economies that have not achieved economic growth in the recent past… Based on current trends, we have to expect the end of progress against extreme poverty…
… It’s no news that we should expect an end to progress against extreme poverty. This article is an update of an article I published in 2019, in which I wrote the same: the fact that the poorest economies are not growing means that the rapid progress against extreme poverty seen in the last decades will end.
Although this prospect has been known for years, it has hardly received the attention it deserves. Progress against extreme poverty was one of humanity’s most outstanding achievements of the past decades — the end of it would be one of the very worst realities of the coming ones.
Importantly, however, these projections are not predictions; their purpose is not to describe what the world in 2030 or 2040 will certainly look like. These projections describe what we have to expect based on current trends; they tell us about our present world rather than the reality of tomorrow. Current trends don’t have to become future facts: many countries left extreme poverty behind in the past, because they had a moment at which they broke out of stagnation.
What these projections tell us, however, is that if the poorest countries do not start to grow, a very bleak future is ahead of us: a future in which extreme poverty remains the reality for hundreds of millions for many years to come…
Eminently worth reading in full– and acting on: “The end of progress against extreme poverty?” from @maxroser.bsky.social and @ourworldindata.org.
* Proverbs 14:31, NIV
###
As we put our shoulders to the wheel, we might spare a thought for a man who contributed mightily to our capacity to feed humanity, Kenneth V. Thimann; he died on this date in 1997. A microbiologist, he was a pioneer in plant physiology (especially the hormones that control the development of plants). Building on the thinking of Frits Went, he identified the first plant hormone to be discovered– the first auxin, a class of growth hormones, and revealed its chemical structure– which proved very important to agriculture and its yields.
#agriculture #auxin #culture #demographics #growthHormones #history #KennethThimann #KennethVThimann #microbiology #OurWorldInData #plantPhysiology #plants #politics #poverty -
I think this chart quite precisely explains why Ukraine is fighting so fiercely. And why all of these countries on the top right are so desperately rearming themselves right now. And why most of of them joined #NATO on the first opportunity.
You can play with the chart on the #OurWorldInData page below - I’ve just added direct neighbours of the country that now poses itself as “dove of peace”
-
I think this chart quite precisely explains why Ukraine is fighting so fiercely. And why all of these countries on the top right are so desperately rearming themselves right now. And why most of of them joined #NATO on the first opportunity.
You can play with the chart on the #OurWorldInData page below - I’ve just added direct neighbours of the country that now poses itself as “dove of peace”
-
Actual share of Gross National Income spent on foreign aid by the US: less than 1 percent.
"Foreign aid from the United States saved millions of lives each year
[...]
[W]hen KFF — a policy research and polling organization — asked people what share they thought was spent on aid, 30% believed that the US spent one-third or more of its budget on aid. And a staggering 15% thought that it spent more than half." -
Actual share of Gross National Income spent on foreign aid by the US: less than 1 percent.
"Foreign aid from the United States saved millions of lives each year
[...]
[W]hen KFF — a policy research and polling organization — asked people what share they thought was spent on aid, 30% believed that the US spent one-third or more of its budget on aid. And a staggering 15% thought that it spent more than half." -
Indians are living 13 years less than the Japanese: Expert flags 7 unhealthy reasons for this
If you’ve ever looked at global life expectancy charts, one thing jumps out: the Japanese are winning at longevity. On average, a person in Japan lives…
#Japan #JP #JapanNews #indianlifestyle #Japanese #Japanesediet #Japanesenews #lifeexpectancy #longevity #news #OurWorldinData
https://www.alojapan.com/1381128/indians-are-living-13-years-less-than-the-japanese-expert-flags-7-unhealthy-reasons-for-this/ -
https://www.alojapan.com/1381128/indians-are-living-13-years-less-than-the-japanese-expert-flags-7-unhealthy-reasons-for-this/ Indians are living 13 years less than the Japanese: Expert flags 7 unhealthy reasons for this #IndianLifestyle #Japan #JapanNews #Japanese #JapaneseDiet #JapaneseNews #LifeExpectancy #longevity #news #OurWorldInData If you’ve ever looked at global life expectancy charts, one thing jumps out: the Japanese are winning at longevity. On average, a person in Japan lives around 85 years, while in India, life expectancy hovers near 72 years (Our Wor
-
"[Hannah Ritchie] In this article, I’ll focus on how Wolbachia can be used against dengue fever. I'll examine how this innovative new method works, how effective it is in reducing transmission, and how it can be rolled out across the tropics to protect as many people as possible."
https://ourworldindata.org/wolbachia-neglected-tropical-diseases
#OurWorldInData #Diseases #Mosquitoes #Wolbachia #Health #Dengue
-
"[Hannah Ritchie] In this article, I’ll focus on how Wolbachia can be used against dengue fever. I'll examine how this innovative new method works, how effective it is in reducing transmission, and how it can be rolled out across the tropics to protect as many people as possible."
https://ourworldindata.org/wolbachia-neglected-tropical-diseases
#OurWorldInData #Diseases #Mosquitoes #Wolbachia #Health #Dengue
-
"This article explains how countries are assigned to income groups, how the thresholds between groups are set and updated, some of the limitations of this classification, and how we use these groups at Our World in Data."
https://ourworldindata.org/world-bank-income-groups-explained
-
"This article explains how countries are assigned to income groups, how the thresholds between groups are set and updated, some of the limitations of this classification, and how we use these groups at Our World in Data."
https://ourworldindata.org/world-bank-income-groups-explained
-
📊 #Robots installed in top five countries https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-industrial-robots-installed
-
📊 #Robots installed in top five countries https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-industrial-robots-installed
-
De kans dat een in Nederland geboren baby zijn 5e verjaardag haalt is in de afgelopen 200 jaar meer dan 80x zo groot geworden
-
De kans dat een in Nederland geboren baby zijn 5e verjaardag haalt is in de afgelopen 200 jaar meer dan 80x zo groot geworden
-
Number of #planets 🪐 discovered outside the #SolarSystem (5824) https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-exoplanets-by-method
-
Number of #planets 🪐 discovered outside the #SolarSystem (5824) https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-exoplanets-by-method
-
Annual number of objects 🛰️ launched into #space 🌌 https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/yearly-number-of-objects-launched-into-outer-space?time=1991..latest by #OurWorldInData
-
Annual number of objects 🛰️ launched into #space 🌌 https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/yearly-number-of-objects-launched-into-outer-space?time=1991..latest by #OurWorldInData
-
Do you think this connection affects the credibility of the data presented by Our World In Data? #OurWorldInData
-
Ça parait contre-intuitif mais pourtant...
https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better
#TheWorldIsMuchBetter #TheWorldIsAwful #TheWorldCanBeMuchBetter
#OurWorldInData -
Ça parait contre-intuitif mais pourtant...
https://ourworldindata.org/much-better-awful-can-be-better
#TheWorldIsMuchBetter #TheWorldIsAwful #TheWorldCanBeMuchBetter
#OurWorldInData -
What if the agreement signed at COP28 last year is actioned: to triple renewables by 2030 over 2023?
Here's primary energy from #FossilFuels, #renewables & total. Renewables are adjusted to allow comparison with wasteful fossil energy. My data from #OurWorldInData has the IEA's substitution method applied.
(See image 2 and: https://ourworldindata.org/energy-substitution-method)At linear growth in energy demand, tripling RE by 2030 actually meets Rockström's carbon law!!
Cause for celebration!! It really IS!
Yet no one reported on it AFAIK? We need to push our governments to achieve AND exceed that!! Exceeding it is important especially for rich nations. To allow for a likely underachievement in poorer nations.Now, what this carbon law says: to halt warming at a bad but manageable level, the world needs to halve CO2 every decade starting in 2020.
Talking in percent is a prop, an aid for minds who think in %.
Meeting Rockström's carbon law doesn't say anything about the actual amount of CO2 that's emitted per decade. And only this number really counts.But it is still something that the signed agreement at COP28 does meet this important gauge! Let's talk about it! Make it known! Make it become a demand!! #FridaysForFuture
-
CW: Profanity
@larryneufeld Oh, what the triple fuck. Thank you for bringing this to my attention:
#OurWorldInData (OWID) is so closely tied with EA that it shares office space with the Centre for Effective Altruism, the movement’s flagship organization, which was founded in 2012 by MacAskill and Toby Ord, who also teaches philosophy at Oxford and, alongside MacAskill, is a leading public intellectual of the movement. The Centre for Effective Altruism is listed as an OWID donor, and Roser has cited Ord as a key reviewer of his work. One of EA’s biggest fans is Elon Musk, who is also a funder of OWID.
-
CW: Profanity
@larryneufeld Oh, what the triple fuck. Thank you for bringing this to my attention:
#OurWorldInData (OWID) is so closely tied with EA that it shares office space with the Centre for Effective Altruism, the movement’s flagship organization, which was founded in 2012 by MacAskill and Toby Ord, who also teaches philosophy at Oxford and, alongside MacAskill, is a leading public intellectual of the movement. The Centre for Effective Altruism is listed as an OWID donor, and Roser has cited Ord as a key reviewer of his work. One of EA’s biggest fans is Elon Musk, who is also a funder of OWID.
-
The 20 year lag is quite something. It tells a story. That's some patience, before seeing the impact on the population at large!
"Smoking was a 20th-century problem. [..] it became steadily more common. By the 1960s, it was extremely widespread: on average, American adults [bought] more than 10 cigarettes every day."
-
The 20 year lag is quite something. It tells a story. That's some patience, before seeing the impact on the population at large!
"Smoking was a 20th-century problem. [..] it became steadily more common. By the 1960s, it was extremely widespread: on average, American adults [bought] more than 10 cigarettes every day."