#inhabit — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #inhabit, aggregated by home.social.
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: inhabitar
------------
Try Christian's word chain building game @ https://wordwallgame.com
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: inhabitar
------------
Try Christian's word chain building game @ https://wordwallgame.com
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: inhabitar
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: inhabitar
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
Mark your calendars for the opening of the 2nd edition of "Contact Zones" at #MuseumAngewandteKunst in Frankfurt am Main on May, 16. The #exhibition showcases works of our #INHABIT #artists from 2022 & 2023, and will be open until July, 28. More info here:
-
We are delighted to welcome our new #artist-in-residence, Clara Jo, next week! She works with #film, #photography and #sculptural installations in order to explore #archives and colonial structures. The intersections of art and science are part of her artistic process. She will be followed in September by our second artist-in-residence of the year, #choreographer and #performer Fabrice Mazliah.
#INHABIT -
Dear Friends of #Server #Space, the Last #Frontier, #Federation, #Section- 31 etc, :gi:
As we #Borg may know: 🦞
- #Schrödinger the #cat is missing and not missing ⚛️
- The #Multiverse #exists mostly everywhere
- Just because it is #true, does not mean it is #real
The reality we #project is #fortunately not the only way in or out. Also we can be forced into alternatives or better yet, #develop #alternative situations to #inhabit our #betterment. :ablobcatgoogly:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_31_(Star_Trek) -
I don't have that #MuchToSay about the current #Israel / #Palestine #Conflict (#IT's #NotMyWar); other than to say:
"#IF those #Determined to #WageWar, a #HolyWar, on #EachOther can't #Find a #BetterWay to #ShareSpace and #PlayNicely; #NoOne will be able to #Inhabit that #Space..."
🧙🎈🤖🐺🤖🎈🧙 | 🕵️🐘🦹🦄🦹🐘🕵️
-
I don't have that #MuchToSay about the current #Israel / #Palestine #Conflict (#IT's #NotMyWar); other than to say:
"#IF those #Determined to #WageWar, a #HolyWar, on #EachOther can't #Find a #BetterWay to #ShareSpace and #PlayNicely; #NoOne will be able to #Inhabit that #Space..."
🧙🎈🤖🐺🤖🎈🧙 | 🕵️🐘🦹🦄🦹🐘🕵️
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
We're thrilled to be kicking off this year's #INHABIT season with Victoria Keddie and Andrius Arutiunian. Both will be staying with us at the MPIEA as #artists in #residence for four months each. We are very happy about the jury’s choice! https://ae.mpg.de/inhabit
-
The common owner/master making the "best use of the #land" to #dispose of as seen fit by the owner is an archaic perversion of how we should now understand our relationship to land ownership and the #planet as a whole.
I've never met a human who has subdued, dominated, conquered, or disposed of one square centimeter of the #earth. That small parcel pre-existed #humanity and will continue to do so long after our kind has come and gone. That small parcel will continue to be #productive long after we've come and gone.
The better frame, is that of #lessor and #lessee because we do not own the earth, we #inhabit it. We cannot "dispose of" the land. As made abundantly clear by global climate change, we can only "dispose of" the climate that supports human inhabitation. Therefore, if some type of ownership exists, it is the totality of collective ownership belonging to each and every one of us.
#Legal #doctrine obviously exists to govern the lessor/lessee relationship. One such legal doctrine is that "Thou shalt not commit waste." But wasting the climate that supports human inhabitation is precisely what we've done. The collective fossil fuel burning "we" are engaging in, is in absolute violation of the doctrine of waste.
As lessees in contract with our collective ownership of the planet, we have therefore wasted the prospective rights of our progeny by utterly failing to uphold our duty.
Environmental lawyers have sought to create a priori "rights" held by the land. These efforts have always failed under the doctrine of "standing." I believe, by reframing the problem as "lessees contracted with a collective owner" model, a public policy argument exists that can withstand being dismissed for lack of standing.
I believe this is an original conception you're reading here first. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- and point me to the doctrine that supports your argument.
Also, please @ people/entities on #Mastodon who you think could help generate feedback and/or insight.
Thank you.
@breadandcircuses @earthfirst @gersh @greenpeace @EricHolthaus @[email protected] @ConserveChange @lessig @Climatehistories @CLE_Allard @joeleisen
@jschmidtnrdc @green #fediscience #Science #Enviroment #Law #EnvironmentalLawyer -
The common owner/master making the "best use of the #land" to #dispose of as seen fit by the owner is an archaic perversion of how we should now understand our relationship to land ownership and the #planet as a whole.
I've never met a human who has subdued, dominated, conquered, or disposed of one square centimeter of the #earth. That small parcel pre-existed #humanity and will continue to do so long after our kind has come and gone. That small parcel will continue to be #productive long after we've come and gone.
The better frame, is that of #lessor and #lessee because we do not own the earth, we #inhabit it. We cannot "dispose of" the land. As made abundantly clear by global climate change, we can only "dispose of" the climate that supports human inhabitation. Therefore, if some type of ownership exists, it is the totality of collective ownership belonging to each and every one of us.
#Legal #doctrine obviously exists to govern the lessor/lessee relationship. One such legal doctrine is that "Thou shalt not commit waste." But wasting the climate that supports human inhabitation is precisely what we've done. The collective fossil fuel burning "we" are engaging in, is in absolute violation of the doctrine of waste.
As lessees in contract with our collective ownership of the planet, we have therefore wasted the prospective rights of our progeny by utterly failing to uphold our duty.
Environmental lawyers have sought to create a priori "rights" held by the land. These efforts have always failed under the doctrine of "standing." I believe, by reframing the problem as "lessees contracted with a collective owner" model, a public policy argument exists that can withstand being dismissed for lack of standing.
I believe this is an original conception you're reading here first. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- and point me to the doctrine that supports your argument.
Also, please @ people/entities on #Mastodon who you think could help generate feedback and/or insight.
Thank you.
@breadandcircuses @earthfirst @gersh @greenpeace @EricHolthaus @[email protected] @ConserveChange @lessig @Climatehistories @CLE_Allard @joeleisen
@jschmidtnrdc @green #fediscience #Science #Enviroment #Law #EnvironmentalLawyer -
The common owner/master making the "best use of the #land" to #dispose of as seen fit by the owner is an archaic perversion of how we should now understand our relationship to land ownership and the #planet as a whole.
I've never met a human who has subdued, dominated, conquered, or disposed of one square centimeter of the #earth. That small parcel pre-existed #humanity and will continue to do so long after our kind has come and gone. That small parcel will continue to be #productive long after we've come and gone.
The better frame, is that of #lessor and #lessee because we do not own the earth, we #inhabit it. We cannot "dispose of" the land. As made abundantly clear by global climate change, we can only "dispose of" the climate that supports human inhabitation. Therefore, if some type of ownership exists, it is the totality of collective ownership belonging to each and every one of us.
#Legal #doctrine obviously exists to govern the lessor/lessee relationship. One such legal doctrine is that "Thou shalt not commit waste." But wasting the climate that supports human inhabitation is precisely what we've done. The collective fossil fuel burning "we" are engaging in, is in absolute violation of the doctrine of waste.
As lessees in contract with our collective ownership of the planet, we have therefore wasted the prospective rights of our progeny by utterly failing to uphold our duty.
Environmental lawyers have sought to create a priori "rights" held by the land. These efforts have always failed under the doctrine of "standing." I believe, by reframing the problem as "lessees contracted with a collective owner" model, a public policy argument exists that can withstand being dismissed for lack of standing.
I believe this is an original conception you're reading here first. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- and point me to the doctrine that supports your argument.
Also, please @ people/entities on #Mastodon who you think could help generate feedback and/or insight.
Thank you.
@breadandcircuses @earthfirst @gersh @greenpeace @EricHolthaus @[email protected] @ConserveChange @lessig @Climatehistories @CLE_Allard @joeleisen
@jschmidtnrdc @green #fediscience #Science #Enviroment #Law #EnvironmentalLawyer -
The common owner/master making the "best use of the #land" to #dispose of as seen fit by the owner is an archaic perversion of how we should now understand our relationship to land ownership and the #planet as a whole.
I've never met a human who has subdued, dominated, conquered, or disposed of one square centimeter of the #earth. That small parcel pre-existed #humanity and will continue to do so long after our kind has come and gone. That small parcel will continue to be #productive long after we've come and gone.
The better frame, is that of #lessor and #lessee because we do not own the earth, we #inhabit it. We cannot "dispose of" the land. As made abundantly clear by global climate change, we can only "dispose of" the climate that supports human inhabitation. Therefore, if some type of ownership exists, it is the totality of collective ownership belonging to each and every one of us.
#Legal #doctrine obviously exists to govern the lessor/lessee relationship. One such legal doctrine is that "Thou shalt not commit waste." But wasting the climate that supports human inhabitation is precisely what we've done. The collective fossil fuel burning "we" are engaging in, is in absolute violation of the doctrine of waste.
As lessees in contract with our collective ownership of the planet, we have therefore wasted the prospective rights of our progeny by utterly failing to uphold our duty.
Environmental lawyers have sought to create a priori "rights" held by the land. These efforts have always failed under the doctrine of "standing." I believe, by reframing the problem as "lessees contracted with a collective owner" model, a public policy argument exists that can withstand being dismissed for lack of standing.
I believe this is an original conception you're reading here first. Please correct me if I'm wrong -- and point me to the doctrine that supports your argument.
Also, please @ people/entities on #Mastodon who you think could help generate feedback and/or insight.
Thank you.
@breadandcircuses @earthfirst @gersh @greenpeace @EricHolthaus @[email protected] @ConserveChange @lessig @Climatehistories @CLE_Allard @joeleisen
@jschmidtnrdc @green #fediscience #Science #Enviroment #Law #EnvironmentalLawyer -
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Report an incorrect translation @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/translations
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------
Learn more languages @ https://wordofthehour.org/r/more
-
#inhabit : to occupy, as a place of settled residence
- French: habite
- German: bewohnt
- Portuguese: habitar
- Spanish: habita
------------------
Word of The Hour's Annual Survey 2020: https://forms.gle/yACMX7nXyNNTBNsK6
-
RT @mocambo
"Nossa tarefa não é generalizar a asfixia, mas eliminar as barreiras para podermos respirar juntos." -
"Nossa tarefa não é generalizar a asfixia, mas eliminar as barreiras para podermos respirar juntos."