#fedimoderation — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #fedimoderation, aggregated by home.social.
-
The Speakeasy uses a two-step process to approve applications, bc "just" turning on approvals doesn"t give us enough info to decide if the person applying is legit. We sort of had a hypo that two step apps would help us catch spam and trolls and so far... it is working!
Stats:
- 2 scam troll accounts using throwaway email
- 1 spam account
- 1 approved
- 2 pending replyEventually, we will fail and let someone in who doesnt vibe. That's just facts. But mostly, requiring enough to get a feel for ppl is working well.
We're of course going to revise as we go, but... fof admins and mods who are frustrated with the limits of Masto sign up options... u might want to consider two step sign ups too!
Let us know if u want to chat abt, we're here to help.
-
The Speakeasy uses a two-step process to approve applications, bc "just" turning on approvals doesn"t give us enough info to decide if the person applying is legit. We sort of had a hypo that two step apps would help us catch spam and trolls and so far... it is working!
Stats:
- 2 scam troll accounts using throwaway email
- 1 spam account
- 1 approved
- 2 pending replyEventually, we will fail and let someone in who doesnt vibe. That's just facts. But mostly, requiring enough to get a feel for ppl is working well.
We're of course going to revise as we go, but... fof admins and mods who are frustrated with the limits of Masto sign up options... u might want to consider two step sign ups too!
Let us know if u want to chat abt, we're here to help.
-
Since adding a couple of simple information requests to the "Why do you want to join this instance" signup question, and stating that applications that fail to include them will be rejected, I have rejected 100% of new signups in record time.
Looks like most of them are lifting the bio info from other existing fediverse accounts. -
Since adding a couple of simple information requests to the "Why do you want to join this instance" signup question, and stating that applications that fail to include them will be rejected, I have rejected 100% of new signups in record time.
Looks like most of them are lifting the bio info from other existing fediverse accounts. -
We're reviewing the below comment and follow-ups from the admin of burnout.cafe. We're probably going to open discussion within the Speakeasy on how to proceed (the instance users on burnout aren't at fault), but we strongly condemn the premise that "gay pornography" needs to be singled out for removal.
Our thoughts:
The admin(at)burnout(dot)cafe call for a ban of "gay pornography.". We believe this to be a homophobic position as it singles out the LGBTQIA+ (Rainbow Panopoly) community for a behavior that is implied to be "less problematic" if heterosexuals do it. To be crystal, sex is natural and healthy and we will not shame our members or anyone on the fedi for enjoying or sharing it. We esp will not be singling out particular sexualities for censure.
The comments from the admin compare gay pornography to execution and gore videos. We believe the comparison of consensual sex to non-consensual violence and graphic injury super offensive; it suggests that non-het sex is somehow wrong.
--
So we are not misunderstood, we do not believe that blocking porn allowing instances on a SEXUALITY NEUTRAL basis is homophobic. But to single out the LBBTQIA+ community specifically is, in our opinion, because it targets us not because we post sex, but because we're not hetero.
-
We're reviewing the below comment and follow-ups from the admin of burnout.cafe. We're probably going to open discussion within the Speakeasy on how to proceed (the instance users on burnout aren't at fault), but we strongly condemn the premise that "gay pornography" needs to be singled out for removal.
Our thoughts:
The admin(at)burnout(dot)cafe call for a ban of "gay pornography.". We believe this to be a homophobic position as it singles out the LGBTQIA+ (Rainbow Panopoly) community for a behavior that is implied to be "less problematic" if heterosexuals do it. To be crystal, sex is natural and healthy and we will not shame our members or anyone on the fedi for enjoying or sharing it. We esp will not be singling out particular sexualities for censure.
The comments from the admin compare gay pornography to execution and gore videos. We believe the comparison of consensual sex to non-consensual violence and graphic injury super offensive; it suggests that non-het sex is somehow wrong.
--
So we are not misunderstood, we do not believe that blocking porn allowing instances on a SEXUALITY NEUTRAL basis is homophobic. But to single out the LBBTQIA+ community specifically is, in our opinion, because it targets us not because we post sex, but because we're not hetero.
-
Good morning, fedi!
Mastodon 4.6 is out, and one feature we were totes looking forward to is mandatory TFA! We strongly recommend our fellow modmins enable it, especially on larger instances where spammers and scammers like to take ovr accounts.
It is kind of non-intuitive; u have to enable it in the roles.
-
Good morning, fedi!
Mastodon 4.6 is out, and one feature we were totes looking forward to is mandatory TFA! We strongly recommend our fellow modmins enable it, especially on larger instances where spammers and scammers like to take ovr accounts.
It is kind of non-intuitive; u have to enable it in the roles.
-
Thank u to @jase for bringing pawoo.net to our attention. Pawoo is yet another Mastodon server run by Sujitech, the ppl behind mastodon.cloud and mstdn.jp. All three instances are extremely behind on patches and moderation isn't happening.
We have reached out to Sujitech repeatedly with no response. BC of the risks, we recommend defederating with all Sujitech instances including:
- mastodon.cloud
- mstdn.jp
- pawoo.netIf u or ur instance members have friends on those instances, it would be good fedi citizenship to help them move. If u need, we can point u to good places to find instances.
Tagging mods and admins as these instances prob pose a security risk. We will update as we find more instances.
-
Thank u to @jase for bringing pawoo.net to our attention. Pawoo is yet another Mastodon server run by Sujitech, the ppl behind mastodon.cloud and mstdn.jp. All three instances are extremely behind on patches and moderation isn't happening.
We have reached out to Sujitech repeatedly with no response. BC of the risks, we recommend defederating with all Sujitech instances including:
- mastodon.cloud
- mstdn.jp
- pawoo.netIf u or ur instance members have friends on those instances, it would be good fedi citizenship to help them move. If u need, we can point u to good places to find instances.
Tagging mods and admins as these instances prob pose a security risk. We will update as we find more instances.
-
If I could have all the electricity and water for free that data centers use up just for AI bots attempting to sign-up at climatejustice.social with sloppy sign-up reasons, I'd probably have to pay no more bills.
Instead I fight AI bots with no compensation and my bills rise and rise.
#FediModeration #FediMod #LLMMeAlone #NoAI #DataCenters #electricity #water
-
If I could have all the electricity and water for free that data centers use up just for AI bots attempting to sign-up at climatejustice.social with sloppy sign-up reasons, I'd probably have to pay no more bills.
Instead I fight AI bots with no compensation and my bills rise and rise.
#FediModeration #FediMod #LLMMeAlone #NoAI #DataCenters #electricity #water
-
As the Speakeasy discusses opening membership to more ppl, one of the biggest questions we have is "how do we age check?"
No, wait! Stop with the pitchforks! We don't mean it like corpos mean it. We just mean, we are an 18+ community and we'd prefer to stay that way, you know? Right now, we have a super long vibe check in secret where we figure it out, but that's just not easy to do if we're letting ppl sign up, even with spot vibe checking.
So, fedi admins, fedi mods... any privacy respecting ways u have found to do this? Or do we need to just saw ppl in half to count their rings?
-
As the Speakeasy discusses opening membership to more ppl, one of the biggest questions we have is "how do we age check?"
No, wait! Stop with the pitchforks! We don't mean it like corpos mean it. We just mean, we are an 18+ community and we'd prefer to stay that way, you know? Right now, we have a super long vibe check in secret where we figure it out, but that's just not easy to do if we're letting ppl sign up, even with spot vibe checking.
So, fedi admins, fedi mods... any privacy respecting ways u have found to do this? Or do we need to just saw ppl in half to count their rings?
-
We've seen a lot of "known ick instances" come across fediblock lately, so to help, we're sharing some blocklists we reviewed / edited to build our initial lists. They are:
https://seirdy.one/posts/2023/05/02/fediverse-blocklists/
https://github.com/gardenfence/blocklist
We always recommend you read through, but if you don't have time... those are a pretty good starting point.
Some ppl use The Bad Space as well; we referenced their 90% list to catch extra ick. We'd suggest reviewing to make sure these lists don't defed instances u want to fed with:
https://tweaking.thebad.space/exports
You're also welcome to use ours (update this wknd we hope:)
-
We've seen a lot of "known ick instances" come across fediblock lately, so to help, we're sharing some blocklists we reviewed / edited to build our initial lists. They are:
https://seirdy.one/posts/2023/05/02/fediverse-blocklists/
https://github.com/gardenfence/blocklist
We always recommend you read through, but if you don't have time... those are a pretty good starting point.
Some ppl use The Bad Space as well; we referenced their 90% list to catch extra ick. We'd suggest reviewing to make sure these lists don't defed instances u want to fed with:
https://tweaking.thebad.space/exports
You're also welcome to use ours (update this wknd we hope:)
-
The Speakeasy has defederated from byzantinenexus(dot)io after investigating the report from @jeffowski concerning the behavior of one of its members.
Investigation revealed that the instance is a haven for antisemitic, racist, and homophobic material. They are primarily federated with the "usual suspects;" baraag, poa(dot)st and stuffs, and lack meqningfum moderation.
Given the bigotry, source of participants, and lack of moderation, we believe defederation is warranted at this time.
-
The Speakeasy has defederated from byzantinenexus(dot)io after investigating the report from @jeffowski concerning the behavior of one of its members.
Investigation revealed that the instance is a haven for antisemitic, racist, and homophobic material. They are primarily federated with the "usual suspects;" baraag, poa(dot)st and stuffs, and lack meqningfum moderation.
Given the bigotry, source of participants, and lack of moderation, we believe defederation is warranted at this time.
-
Hey moderators of Mastodon... is there a way to import a list of problem users to ban them as a group at the instance lvl? We ask because we see a few very prolific, very obnoxious serial block evaders come up on the reg. It would be great to create a shareable list to allow mods to ban them with a click.
-
Hey moderators of Mastodon... is there a way to import a list of problem users to ban them as a group at the instance lvl? We ask because we see a few very prolific, very obnoxious serial block evaders come up on the reg. It would be great to create a shareable list to allow mods to ban them with a click.
-
I agree 100% with you for the need of a 'post under moderation' flag. That would make mod's work so much easier, also because it removes a lot of pressure to come up with a firm decision taken consensually by a team of volunteers dispersed over all timezones.
Nevertheless, I am still i favour of mods being able to delete posts (there's a lot of heinous shit we don't see because somebody made an early report and the mods could act swiftly on obviously horrible things®).
I mean, moderation errors sometimes happen and post deletions can be already reversed.
On the other side, although I am more on the 'if you don't like your mods decisions, move to another instance'-argument side, the moving costs are too high (you'll loose your posts and sometimes followers) and in practice, at the moment of setting up an account it is not possible to know how moderation rules are enforced on a specific instance.
EDIT: that said, it is of course preferrable when mods contact users with 'hey, for reasons XY we suggest that you delete the post'. But again, this works only for the 'homo fediresponsiblus' kind of person and then there's also the mod-workload thing.
-
I agree 100% with you for the need of a 'post under moderation' flag. That would make mod's work so much easier, also because it removes a lot of pressure to come up with a firm decision taken consensually by a team of volunteers dispersed over all timezones.
Nevertheless, I am still i favour of mods being able to delete posts (there's a lot of heinous shit we don't see because somebody made an early report and the mods could act swiftly on obviously horrible things®).
I mean, moderation errors sometimes happen and post deletions can be already reversed.
On the other side, although I am more on the 'if you don't like your mods decisions, move to another instance'-argument side, the moving costs are too high (you'll loose your posts and sometimes followers) and in practice, at the moment of setting up an account it is not possible to know how moderation rules are enforced on a specific instance.
EDIT: that said, it is of course preferrable when mods contact users with 'hey, for reasons XY we suggest that you delete the post'. But again, this works only for the 'homo fediresponsiblus' kind of person and then there's also the mod-workload thing.
-
So. Fertig. Ich hab genug. 😟
Hab jetzt die Instanz umgestellt auf "erstmal Account beantragen". Leider eine Hürde für echte Menschen aber halt auch eine Hürde für die Scam-Accounts.
-
So. Fertig. Ich hab genug. 😟
Hab jetzt die Instanz umgestellt auf "erstmal Account beantragen". Leider eine Hürde für echte Menschen aber halt auch eine Hürde für die Scam-Accounts.
-
CW: Harassment on Mastodon
Your points in this thread about harassment of visible female/POC accounts are extremely valid.
Might be really one of the reasons why Mastodon still struggles to get traction. (Caveat: we should care more about the people, not so much about comparing user counts of platforms, of course).
Dear people, consider also that it is much easier to endure the infrequent but still horrible nazi-harasser when you feel supported by the community. When you feel unwelcome because of replyguys and mansplainers, maybe you don't have the spoons to endure the additional "real" targeted harassment..Sadly, I know no silver bullet for this situation besides all the stuff we know already:
- don't be an asshole reply guy. Breathe before responding. Ask yourself: does the world really need my answer? Read people's profiles before interacting, especially when you disagree with something. (This helps also to reduce mansplaining)
- don't question the experience of people describing harassment. Just don't.
- report harassment also when it targets others. And step in. No need to be overzealous and get the pitchforks when a possibly neurodivergent person (especially when english is not their native language) writes a post in a weird tone. Our social media culture is heavily US-centered and not everybody understands the same codes. Learn ways to step in responsibly and adequate. A restorative justice approach might be more productive than outrage cyclesin the long run, but of course, there are clear red lines.
- for mods/afmins: consider stricter anti-harassment moderation and less "this is the internet, man up" - discourses
- support people that try to implement anti-harassment tools into Mastodon, because of course, it is the culture of human interactions in each place, but the available tools for moderation and interaction (e. g. control over visibility, optional restrict replies or similar). Some stuff is moving in the right direction, but still I have sometimes the sensation that stuff like fancy buttons is prioritized over these things.
- fucking listen to people.
... -
CW: Harassment on Mastodon
Your points in this thread about harassment of visible female/POC accounts are extremely valid.
Might be really one of the reasons why Mastodon still struggles to get traction. (Caveat: we should care more about the people, not so much about comparing user counts of platforms, of course).
Dear people, consider also that it is much easier to endure the infrequent but still horrible nazi-harasser when you feel supported by the community. When you feel unwelcome because of replyguys and mansplainers, maybe you don't have the spoons to endure the additional "real" targeted harassment..Sadly, I know no silver bullet for this situation besides all the stuff we know already:
- don't be an asshole reply guy. Breathe before responding. Ask yourself: does the world really need my answer? Read people's profiles before interacting, especially when you disagree with something. (This helps also to reduce mansplaining)
- don't question the experience of people describing harassment. Just don't.
- report harassment also when it targets others. And step in. No need to be overzealous and get the pitchforks when a possibly neurodivergent person (especially when english is not their native language) writes a post in a weird tone. Our social media culture is heavily US-centered and not everybody understands the same codes. Learn ways to step in responsibly and adequate. A restorative justice approach might be more productive than outrage cyclesin the long run, but of course, there are clear red lines.
- for mods/afmins: consider stricter anti-harassment moderation and less "this is the internet, man up" - discourses
- support people that try to implement anti-harassment tools into Mastodon, because of course, it is the culture of human interactions in each place, but the available tools for moderation and interaction (e. g. control over visibility, optional restrict replies or similar). Some stuff is moving in the right direction, but still I have sometimes the sensation that stuff like fancy buttons is prioritized over these things.
- fucking listen to people.
... -
#Fediverse #Blocklists: #Moderation in Noncapitalist #SocialMedia
> the paper explores how fediverse blocklist developers attempt to mitigate the problems of lists while also generating knowledge about content moderation@aram York University
2025-09-20: https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/1556
#SciComm #WissKomm #FediModeration #CulturalStudies #SocialScience #SocialMedia #ContentModeration
-
#Fediverse #Blocklists: #Moderation in Noncapitalist #SocialMedia
> the paper explores how fediverse blocklist developers attempt to mitigate the problems of lists while also generating knowledge about content moderation@aram York University
2025-09-20: https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/1556
#SciComm #WissKomm #FediModeration #CulturalStudies #SocialScience #SocialMedia #ContentModeration
-
CW: Fedi meta
It wouldn't catch all malicious actors, of course. But it seems like it'd be nice to at least force them to use names that are a little opaque, instead of being able to have outright slurs *right in their very account names*. Is there no such feature in the software? (And if not, why not? I'm a software developer, I *know* it couldn't be that difficult to implement.) 2/2
-
CW: Fedi meta
It wouldn't catch all malicious actors, of course. But it seems like it'd be nice to at least force them to use names that are a little opaque, instead of being able to have outright slurs *right in their very account names*. Is there no such feature in the software? (And if not, why not? I'm a software developer, I *know* it couldn't be that difficult to implement.) 2/2
-
CW: Fedi meta
Honest question from someone who's never admin'd an instance and so has no idea:
Is it really that hard to just set up something that will flag (or block) certain strings in new-signup account names? Like, you want open signups, fine, but couldn't it at least message the admins if someone signs up with a name that matches any of various regexes (which would catch things like slurs, "Hitler", "WhitePower", etc.)? 1/2
-
CW: Fedi meta
Honest question from someone who's never admin'd an instance and so has no idea:
Is it really that hard to just set up something that will flag (or block) certain strings in new-signup account names? Like, you want open signups, fine, but couldn't it at least message the admins if someone signs up with a name that matches any of various regexes (which would catch things like slurs, "Hitler", "WhitePower", etc.)? 1/2
-
We should pay attention to how the far-right movement will try to undermine BlueSky. What we learn could be useful in the future.
Moderation might turn out to be the biggest challenge.
-
We should pay attention to how the far-right movement will try to undermine BlueSky. What we learn could be useful in the future.
Moderation might turn out to be the biggest challenge.
-
Y'know, I think people like the Jimmy Truths dude serve as an example of the shortcomings of #Fediverse moderation. This dude has likely made like, hundreds of accounts on dozens of instances, but all the instance owners can do is suspend his account. It's gotten to the point where the dude now keeps coming back with usernames and posts mocking the admins for being unable to permanently remove him, often on the same instance repeatedly.
Larger companies can do things like send cease and desist letters, contact his ISP, hardware ban him, etc a lot easier. They simply have more resources to deal with really tenacious harassers than the average instance admin does. I'm not a networking expert, but I wish there was a way to actually deal with guys like this because as the Fediverse grows in popularity, it's likely more users like this guy will crop up.
I can imagine it being pretty easy for bad actors to focus their attention on a single instance and overwhelm it if there's enough of them. Or people like this dude so persistent and obnoxious that it wears the often volunteer staff down over a long stretch of time.
There seriously needs to be focus put on improving moderation tools for Mastodon before we get to that point.
-
Y'know, I think people like the Jimmy Truths dude serve as an example of the shortcomings of #Fediverse moderation. This dude has likely made like, hundreds of accounts on dozens of instances, but all the instance owners can do is suspend his account. It's gotten to the point where the dude now keeps coming back with usernames and posts mocking the admins for being unable to permanently remove him, often on the same instance repeatedly.
Larger companies can do things like send cease and desist letters, contact his ISP, hardware ban him, etc a lot easier. They simply have more resources to deal with really tenacious harassers than the average instance admin does. I'm not a networking expert, but I wish there was a way to actually deal with guys like this because as the Fediverse grows in popularity, it's likely more users like this guy will crop up.
I can imagine it being pretty easy for bad actors to focus their attention on a single instance and overwhelm it if there's enough of them. Or people like this dude so persistent and obnoxious that it wears the often volunteer staff down over a long stretch of time.
There seriously needs to be focus put on improving moderation tools for Mastodon before we get to that point.
-
There appears to be another wave of bots sharing TinyURL links and NSFW hashtags, while not using any content warning to censor the thumbnail, which is uncensored porn. The URLs may lead to phishing or malware.
The description used by the accounts seems to promote some shopping website, which may be another scam.
-
There appears to be another wave of bots sharing TinyURL links and NSFW hashtags, while not using any content warning to censor the thumbnail, which is uncensored porn. The URLs may lead to phishing or malware.
The description used by the accounts seems to promote some shopping website, which may be another scam.
-
I'm intrigued by some posts I've seen saying that Mastodon, or more generally the Fediverse, has the same problem with minorities that we find widely on traditional social media platforms, especially the big tech ones like x and meta. I disagree if you compare it to the cases where constantly outrageous posts appear on your timeline harming minorities.
How could technology solve a problem that is inherently caused by human beings? If, at the moment, this federated social media is still not a safe space for minorities, isn't this a good time and a great opportunity to solve the moderation problems while we still have far fewer people active here? Offenders will not cease to exist, and technology can only mitigate the damage they can cause.
We have a big challenge if this is really going to scale.
#fediverse #minorities #ContentModeration #FediModeration #Mastodon
-
I'm intrigued by some posts I've seen saying that Mastodon, or more generally the Fediverse, has the same problem with minorities that we find widely on traditional social media platforms, especially the big tech ones like x and meta. I disagree if you compare it to the cases where constantly outrageous posts appear on your timeline harming minorities.
How could technology solve a problem that is inherently caused by human beings? If, at the moment, this federated social media is still not a safe space for minorities, isn't this a good time and a great opportunity to solve the moderation problems while we still have far fewer people active here? Offenders will not cease to exist, and technology can only mitigate the damage they can cause.
We have a big challenge if this is really going to scale.
#fediverse #minorities #ContentModeration #FediModeration #Mastodon
-
@BeAware @askesis 18 years ago, the University of São Paulo tried to create its own social network platform, the Stoa project http://stoa.usp.br (it seems abandoned, they don't even have an SSL certificate).
Indeed, moderation was an issue. As an example, I had my blog and account deleted, because the rector ordered, and I was fired from the development team, due to a misunderstanding. I published a first April joke, that some people believed, and it even ended up in the news. 😂
Be the way, one of the goals of the project was to be federated and we aimed to connect to other educational and research institutes, using some protocol that allowed that.
Today I laugh, but there were some tough cases where some people were advocating violence, and our small team (4-5 developers) had to deal with it. I cannot image how it would be in case of a very active system in a university as big as University of São Paulo, that can have hundreds of thousands, if we allow the alumni to join. Or dozens of thousands, if just active members can join. You need a team dedicated to the moderation, which is not trivial.
P. S. 18 years, not 14, as I initially wrote. Oh, gosh, almost 2 decades!
#university #decentralization #federation #fediverse #FediModeration
-
@BeAware @askesis 18 years ago, the University of São Paulo tried to create its own social network platform, the Stoa project http://stoa.usp.br (it seems abandoned, they don't even have an SSL certificate).
Indeed, moderation was an issue. As an example, I had my blog and account deleted, because the rector ordered, and I was fired from the development team, due to a misunderstanding. I published a first April joke, that some people believed, and it even ended up in the news. 😂
Be the way, one of the goals of the project was to be federated and we aimed to connect to other educational and research institutes, using some protocol that allowed that.
Today I laugh, but there were some tough cases where some people were advocating violence, and our small team (4-5 developers) had to deal with it. I cannot image how it would be in case of a very active system in a university as big as University of São Paulo, that can have hundreds of thousands, if we allow the alumni to join. Or dozens of thousands, if just active members can join. You need a team dedicated to the moderation, which is not trivial.
P. S. 18 years, not 14, as I initially wrote. Oh, gosh, almost 2 decades!
#university #decentralization #federation #fediverse #FediModeration
-
Why are big Instances bad for the Fediverse?
It's quite simple:
bigger instance -> more moderation work -> need for bigger team -> harder to find consensus within the moderation team -> less strict moderationAlso:
bigger instance -> more different ideologies among userbase -> harder for other instances to decide to block that instance / or greater impact on federation if big instances are blockedAdditionally small instances can't easily block big instances, because doing so would impact their own userbase a lot and drive even more people to large instances.
So big instances mean a lot more work for smaller instances, because they have to deal with much more individual bad actors instead of just FediBlocking them in bulk.
All Fediverse softwares should have a 2k limit for monthly active users, so all instances automatically temporarily close registrations when that limit is reached.
#FediverseMeta #BigInstances #FediModeration #FediMods #FediBlockMeta
-
Why are big Instances bad for the Fediverse?
It's quite simple:
bigger instance -> more moderation work -> need for bigger team -> harder to find consensus within the moderation team -> less strict moderationAlso:
bigger instance -> more different ideologies among userbase -> harder for other instances to decide to block that instance / or greater impact on federation if big instances are blockedAdditionally small instances can't easily block big instances, because doing so would impact their own userbase a lot and drive even more people to large instances.
So big instances mean a lot more work for smaller instances, because they have to deal with much more individual bad actors instead of just FediBlocking them in bulk.
All Fediverse softwares should have a 2k limit for monthly active users, so all instances automatically temporarily close registrations when that limit is reached.
#FediverseMeta #BigInstances #FediModeration #FediMods #FediBlockMeta
-
Two moderation features I wish mastodon had:
1. The ability to hide a comment from my replies. Or at least, if I block someone, their replies are not listed underneath my post on all servers
2. The ability to turn off replies. -
Two moderation features I wish mastodon had:
1. The ability to hide a comment from my replies. Or at least, if I block someone, their replies are not listed underneath my post on all servers
2. The ability to turn off replies. -
But it's fine to call for the extermination of the Palestinian people, en masse?
That's not a problem for #FediModeration then
Got it
-
But it's fine to call for the extermination of the Palestinian people, en masse?
That's not a problem for #FediModeration then
Got it
-
A CALL FOR ALL #FEDIVERSE MODERATORS
#Israel #Antisemitism #LawPlease note:
According to German Press Agency dpa, today 03:50 GMT, the slogan which I see frequently in my TL and which begins
“From the river”
is illegal in my country (!)It is §130; hatepeech; inciting hatred against "national, racial, religious or ethnic groups"
Depending on the content, I will report such to the Staatsschutz (German State Protection).
-
A CALL FOR ALL #FEDIVERSE MODERATORS
#Israel #Antisemitism #LawPlease note:
According to German Press Agency dpa, today 03:50 GMT, the slogan which I see frequently in my TL and which begins
“From the river”
is illegal in my country (!)It is §130; hatepeech; inciting hatred against "national, racial, religious or ethnic groups"
Depending on the content, I will report such to the Staatsschutz (German State Protection).