#communityguidelines — Public Fediverse posts

Is This Chaos Accidental?

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — July 18, 2026

Asking the Uncomfortable Question

At some point, prolonged disorder stops looking like incompetence and starts looking like intent.

That is the question this essay confronts, cautiously but directly: is TikTok’s chaos simply the result of scale and poor governance, or is it the byproduct of a deeper internal philosophy that treats user confusion as a feature rather than a flaw?

This is not an accusation. It is an analytical question that arises naturally when systems behave consistently badly over time.

Chaos, Consistently Applied

TikTok’s terms of service and community guidelines exist on paper. In practice, they behave more like suggestions than rules.

Enforcement is:

• Inconsistent across regions
• Opaque to users
• Poorly explained when action is taken
• Largely immune to appeal

The result is not merely frustration. It is disorientation. Users do not learn what behavior is acceptable. They learn only that outcomes are unpredictable.

That unpredictability has persisted long enough to raise a serious question: what if that confusion is the point?

Ridicule as a Systemic Byproduct

One possible interpretation — uncomfortable but increasingly difficult to dismiss — is that the platform’s internal culture may be quietly contemptuous of how the general public uses social media.

Not hostile. Not openly adversarial. Simply dismissive.

Under this interpretation, chaos functions as a kind of ridicule. Users are trained to dance for visibility, guess at invisible rules, and accept penalties without explanation. The more people scramble, the more engagement is generated. The more engagement is generated, the more the system is justified internally.

From the inside, this may look clever. From the outside, it looks exploitative.

The Hacker-Origin Hypothesis

There is another question that follows naturally from this pattern.

Is it possible that TikTok’s architecture reflects the mindset of a hacker collective that successfully monetized its skills — building a legitimate revenue machine while retaining an internal culture that delights in gaming, destabilizing, and outmaneuvering its own users?

Again, this is not an allegation. It is a hypothesis prompted by behavior.

Systems reflect the values of the people who design them. When a platform repeatedly privileges confusion over clarity, leverage over trust, and engagement over governance, it is reasonable to ask what worldview shaped those decisions.

Learning From What Others Get Away With

There is also a more mundane explanation, and it is not mutually exclusive.

TikTok may simply be watching what other major platforms have normalized — learning that weak enforcement, vague rules, and performative accountability carry little real consequence.

If regulatory capture and public fatigue allow large platforms to behave this way, the lesson is obvious: if they can do it, so can we.

That logic does not require malice. It only requires indifference to downstream harm.

Why This Question Matters

Whether TikTok’s chaos stems from cultural contempt, inherited norms, or strategic cynicism is ultimately less important than the outcome.

The outcome is the same:

• Users absorb risk without clarity
• Creators operate under constant uncertainty
• Sellers are asked to transact on shifting ground

A platform that ridicules its users — even implicitly — cannot be trusted with commerce, governance, or long-term social influence.

And yet TikTok continues to expand its reach and its ambitions without resolving these foundational contradictions.

Holding the Question Open

This essay does not close the case. It opens it.

Future entries in this series will continue to document behavior, not speculate wildly about motives. But it is important to name the question plainly now, before the evidence piles higher:

Is TikTok’s disorder an accident — or is it an expression of how its architects actually view the people who rely on it?

If that question feels uncomfortable, it should.

For more social commentary and excellent fiction, see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

This essay will be archived to the WPS News Monthly Brief available through Amazon.

Is This Chaos Accidental?

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — July 18, 2026

Asking the Uncomfortable Question

At some point, prolonged disorder stops looking like incompetence and starts looking like intent.

That is the question this essay confronts, cautiously but directly: is TikTok’s chaos simply the result of scale and poor governance, or is it the byproduct of a deeper internal philosophy that treats user confusion as a feature rather than a flaw?

This is not an accusation. It is an analytical question that arises naturally when systems behave consistently badly over time.

Chaos, Consistently Applied

TikTok’s terms of service and community guidelines exist on paper. In practice, they behave more like suggestions than rules.

Enforcement is:

• Inconsistent across regions
• Opaque to users
• Poorly explained when action is taken
• Largely immune to appeal

The result is not merely frustration. It is disorientation. Users do not learn what behavior is acceptable. They learn only that outcomes are unpredictable.

That unpredictability has persisted long enough to raise a serious question: what if that confusion is the point?

Ridicule as a Systemic Byproduct

One possible interpretation — uncomfortable but increasingly difficult to dismiss — is that the platform’s internal culture may be quietly contemptuous of how the general public uses social media.

Not hostile. Not openly adversarial. Simply dismissive.

Under this interpretation, chaos functions as a kind of ridicule. Users are trained to dance for visibility, guess at invisible rules, and accept penalties without explanation. The more people scramble, the more engagement is generated. The more engagement is generated, the more the system is justified internally.

From the inside, this may look clever. From the outside, it looks exploitative.

The Hacker-Origin Hypothesis

There is another question that follows naturally from this pattern.

Is it possible that TikTok’s architecture reflects the mindset of a hacker collective that successfully monetized its skills — building a legitimate revenue machine while retaining an internal culture that delights in gaming, destabilizing, and outmaneuvering its own users?

Again, this is not an allegation. It is a hypothesis prompted by behavior.

Systems reflect the values of the people who design them. When a platform repeatedly privileges confusion over clarity, leverage over trust, and engagement over governance, it is reasonable to ask what worldview shaped those decisions.

Learning From What Others Get Away With

There is also a more mundane explanation, and it is not mutually exclusive.

TikTok may simply be watching what other major platforms have normalized — learning that weak enforcement, vague rules, and performative accountability carry little real consequence.

If regulatory capture and public fatigue allow large platforms to behave this way, the lesson is obvious: if they can do it, so can we.

That logic does not require malice. It only requires indifference to downstream harm.

Why This Question Matters

Whether TikTok’s chaos stems from cultural contempt, inherited norms, or strategic cynicism is ultimately less important than the outcome.

The outcome is the same:

• Users absorb risk without clarity
• Creators operate under constant uncertainty
• Sellers are asked to transact on shifting ground

A platform that ridicules its users — even implicitly — cannot be trusted with commerce, governance, or long-term social influence.

And yet TikTok continues to expand its reach and its ambitions without resolving these foundational contradictions.

Holding the Question Open

This essay does not close the case. It opens it.

Future entries in this series will continue to document behavior, not speculate wildly about motives. But it is important to name the question plainly now, before the evidence piles higher:

Is TikTok’s disorder an accident — or is it an expression of how its architects actually view the people who rely on it?

If that question feels uncomfortable, it should.

For more social commentary and excellent fiction, see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

This essay will be archived to the WPS News Monthly Brief available through Amazon.

Is This Chaos Accidental?

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — July 18, 2026

Asking the Uncomfortable Question

At some point, prolonged disorder stops looking like incompetence and starts looking like intent.

That is the question this essay confronts, cautiously but directly: is TikTok’s chaos simply the result of scale and poor governance, or is it the byproduct of a deeper internal philosophy that treats user confusion as a feature rather than a flaw?

This is not an accusation. It is an analytical question that arises naturally when systems behave consistently badly over time.

Chaos, Consistently Applied

TikTok’s terms of service and community guidelines exist on paper. In practice, they behave more like suggestions than rules.

Enforcement is:

• Inconsistent across regions
• Opaque to users
• Poorly explained when action is taken
• Largely immune to appeal

The result is not merely frustration. It is disorientation. Users do not learn what behavior is acceptable. They learn only that outcomes are unpredictable.

That unpredictability has persisted long enough to raise a serious question: what if that confusion is the point?

Ridicule as a Systemic Byproduct

One possible interpretation — uncomfortable but increasingly difficult to dismiss — is that the platform’s internal culture may be quietly contemptuous of how the general public uses social media.

Not hostile. Not openly adversarial. Simply dismissive.

Under this interpretation, chaos functions as a kind of ridicule. Users are trained to dance for visibility, guess at invisible rules, and accept penalties without explanation. The more people scramble, the more engagement is generated. The more engagement is generated, the more the system is justified internally.

From the inside, this may look clever. From the outside, it looks exploitative.

The Hacker-Origin Hypothesis

There is another question that follows naturally from this pattern.

Is it possible that TikTok’s architecture reflects the mindset of a hacker collective that successfully monetized its skills — building a legitimate revenue machine while retaining an internal culture that delights in gaming, destabilizing, and outmaneuvering its own users?

Again, this is not an allegation. It is a hypothesis prompted by behavior.

Systems reflect the values of the people who design them. When a platform repeatedly privileges confusion over clarity, leverage over trust, and engagement over governance, it is reasonable to ask what worldview shaped those decisions.

Learning From What Others Get Away With

There is also a more mundane explanation, and it is not mutually exclusive.

TikTok may simply be watching what other major platforms have normalized — learning that weak enforcement, vague rules, and performative accountability carry little real consequence.

If regulatory capture and public fatigue allow large platforms to behave this way, the lesson is obvious: if they can do it, so can we.

That logic does not require malice. It only requires indifference to downstream harm.

Why This Question Matters

Whether TikTok’s chaos stems from cultural contempt, inherited norms, or strategic cynicism is ultimately less important than the outcome.

The outcome is the same:

• Users absorb risk without clarity
• Creators operate under constant uncertainty
• Sellers are asked to transact on shifting ground

A platform that ridicules its users — even implicitly — cannot be trusted with commerce, governance, or long-term social influence.

And yet TikTok continues to expand its reach and its ambitions without resolving these foundational contradictions.

Holding the Question Open

This essay does not close the case. It opens it.

Future entries in this series will continue to document behavior, not speculate wildly about motives. But it is important to name the question plainly now, before the evidence piles higher:

Is TikTok’s disorder an accident — or is it an expression of how its architects actually view the people who rely on it?

If that question feels uncomfortable, it should.

For more social commentary and excellent fiction, see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

This essay will be archived to the WPS News Monthly Brief available through Amazon.

Is This Chaos Accidental?

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — July 18, 2026

Asking the Uncomfortable Question

At some point, prolonged disorder stops looking like incompetence and starts looking like intent.

That is the question this essay confronts, cautiously but directly: is TikTok’s chaos simply the result of scale and poor governance, or is it the byproduct of a deeper internal philosophy that treats user confusion as a feature rather than a flaw?

This is not an accusation. It is an analytical question that arises naturally when systems behave consistently badly over time.

Chaos, Consistently Applied

TikTok’s terms of service and community guidelines exist on paper. In practice, they behave more like suggestions than rules.

Enforcement is:

• Inconsistent across regions
• Opaque to users
• Poorly explained when action is taken
• Largely immune to appeal

The result is not merely frustration. It is disorientation. Users do not learn what behavior is acceptable. They learn only that outcomes are unpredictable.

That unpredictability has persisted long enough to raise a serious question: what if that confusion is the point?

Ridicule as a Systemic Byproduct

One possible interpretation — uncomfortable but increasingly difficult to dismiss — is that the platform’s internal culture may be quietly contemptuous of how the general public uses social media.

Not hostile. Not openly adversarial. Simply dismissive.

Under this interpretation, chaos functions as a kind of ridicule. Users are trained to dance for visibility, guess at invisible rules, and accept penalties without explanation. The more people scramble, the more engagement is generated. The more engagement is generated, the more the system is justified internally.

From the inside, this may look clever. From the outside, it looks exploitative.

The Hacker-Origin Hypothesis

There is another question that follows naturally from this pattern.

Is it possible that TikTok’s architecture reflects the mindset of a hacker collective that successfully monetized its skills — building a legitimate revenue machine while retaining an internal culture that delights in gaming, destabilizing, and outmaneuvering its own users?

Again, this is not an allegation. It is a hypothesis prompted by behavior.

Systems reflect the values of the people who design them. When a platform repeatedly privileges confusion over clarity, leverage over trust, and engagement over governance, it is reasonable to ask what worldview shaped those decisions.

Learning From What Others Get Away With

There is also a more mundane explanation, and it is not mutually exclusive.

TikTok may simply be watching what other major platforms have normalized — learning that weak enforcement, vague rules, and performative accountability carry little real consequence.

If regulatory capture and public fatigue allow large platforms to behave this way, the lesson is obvious: if they can do it, so can we.

That logic does not require malice. It only requires indifference to downstream harm.

Why This Question Matters

Whether TikTok’s chaos stems from cultural contempt, inherited norms, or strategic cynicism is ultimately less important than the outcome.

The outcome is the same:

• Users absorb risk without clarity
• Creators operate under constant uncertainty
• Sellers are asked to transact on shifting ground

A platform that ridicules its users — even implicitly — cannot be trusted with commerce, governance, or long-term social influence.

And yet TikTok continues to expand its reach and its ambitions without resolving these foundational contradictions.

Holding the Question Open

This essay does not close the case. It opens it.

Future entries in this series will continue to document behavior, not speculate wildly about motives. But it is important to name the question plainly now, before the evidence piles higher:

Is TikTok’s disorder an accident — or is it an expression of how its architects actually view the people who rely on it?

If that question feels uncomfortable, it should.

For more social commentary and excellent fiction, see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

This essay will be archived to the WPS News Monthly Brief available through Amazon.

Is This Chaos Accidental?

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — July 18, 2026

Asking the Uncomfortable Question

At some point, prolonged disorder stops looking like incompetence and starts looking like intent.

That is the question this essay confronts, cautiously but directly: is TikTok’s chaos simply the result of scale and poor governance, or is it the byproduct of a deeper internal philosophy that treats user confusion as a feature rather than a flaw?

This is not an accusation. It is an analytical question that arises naturally when systems behave consistently badly over time.

Chaos, Consistently Applied

TikTok’s terms of service and community guidelines exist on paper. In practice, they behave more like suggestions than rules.

Enforcement is:

• Inconsistent across regions
• Opaque to users
• Poorly explained when action is taken
• Largely immune to appeal

The result is not merely frustration. It is disorientation. Users do not learn what behavior is acceptable. They learn only that outcomes are unpredictable.

That unpredictability has persisted long enough to raise a serious question: what if that confusion is the point?

Ridicule as a Systemic Byproduct

One possible interpretation — uncomfortable but increasingly difficult to dismiss — is that the platform’s internal culture may be quietly contemptuous of how the general public uses social media.

Not hostile. Not openly adversarial. Simply dismissive.

Under this interpretation, chaos functions as a kind of ridicule. Users are trained to dance for visibility, guess at invisible rules, and accept penalties without explanation. The more people scramble, the more engagement is generated. The more engagement is generated, the more the system is justified internally.

From the inside, this may look clever. From the outside, it looks exploitative.

The Hacker-Origin Hypothesis

There is another question that follows naturally from this pattern.

Is it possible that TikTok’s architecture reflects the mindset of a hacker collective that successfully monetized its skills — building a legitimate revenue machine while retaining an internal culture that delights in gaming, destabilizing, and outmaneuvering its own users?

Again, this is not an allegation. It is a hypothesis prompted by behavior.

Systems reflect the values of the people who design them. When a platform repeatedly privileges confusion over clarity, leverage over trust, and engagement over governance, it is reasonable to ask what worldview shaped those decisions.

Learning From What Others Get Away With

There is also a more mundane explanation, and it is not mutually exclusive.

TikTok may simply be watching what other major platforms have normalized — learning that weak enforcement, vague rules, and performative accountability carry little real consequence.

If regulatory capture and public fatigue allow large platforms to behave this way, the lesson is obvious: if they can do it, so can we.

That logic does not require malice. It only requires indifference to downstream harm.

Why This Question Matters

Whether TikTok’s chaos stems from cultural contempt, inherited norms, or strategic cynicism is ultimately less important than the outcome.

The outcome is the same:

• Users absorb risk without clarity
• Creators operate under constant uncertainty
• Sellers are asked to transact on shifting ground

A platform that ridicules its users — even implicitly — cannot be trusted with commerce, governance, or long-term social influence.

And yet TikTok continues to expand its reach and its ambitions without resolving these foundational contradictions.

Holding the Question Open

This essay does not close the case. It opens it.

Future entries in this series will continue to document behavior, not speculate wildly about motives. But it is important to name the question plainly now, before the evidence piles higher:

Is TikTok’s disorder an accident — or is it an expression of how its architects actually view the people who rely on it?

If that question feels uncomfortable, it should.

For more social commentary and excellent fiction, see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

This essay will be archived to the WPS News Monthly Brief available through Amazon.

YOUTUBE'S PARTNER PROGRAM — STILL A GATEWAY FOR CONTENT CREATORS

YouTube Partner Program entry blocked by active Community Guidelines strikes. Channels must wait for strikes to expire before applying for monetization.

#YouTubePartnerProgram, #ContentCreator, #Monetization, #CommunityGuidelines, #YouTubeStrikes

https://newsletter.tf/youtube-partner-program-strikes-block-monetization/

Active strikes on YouTube channels now directly prevent joining the Partner Program. This is a strict change for creators wanting to earn money.

#YouTubePartnerProgram, #ContentCreator, #Monetization, #CommunityGuidelines, #YouTubeStrikes
https://newsletter.tf/youtube-partner-program-strikes-block-monetization/

Residents are advised to maintain a distance of at least one kilometer from the specified locations. #PublicSafety #CommunityGuidelines

Residents are advised to maintain a distance of at least one kilometer from the specified locations. #PublicSafety #CommunityGuidelines

The internet is quietly becoming a walled garden.

I recently created a QQ account and made this single post in the Off-topic -> General board. To my surprise, I got banned a couple hours later for "Spam." My post wasn’t commercial or anything; it was just a genuine discussion.

You have been banned for the following reason: Spam. Please contact the administrator if this was done in error.

I’ve always thought spamming involved sending unsolicited messages to multiple users, not a single thread. Has anyone else experienced something similar? Is this a common issue on QQ, or did I just have bad luck?

On top of that, after posting this on r/Fanfiction, it was removed by the moderators because r/Fanfiction is not the place to discuss real-life drama. Now I'm starting to think it’s less about that particular site and more about the internet as a whole. The internet is quietly becoming a walled garden. It’s not just about one platform anymore—it’s the pattern. You get banned for a single, harmless post. A subreddit removes your thread because it’s “real-life drama.” Cumulatively, it creates an environment where you hesitate before posting anything that isn’t perfectly sanitized.

The internet is quietly becoming a walled garden.

I recently created a QQ account and made this single post in the Off-topic -> General board. To my surprise, I got banned a couple hours later for "Spam." My post wasn’t commercial or anything; it was just a genuine discussion.

You have been banned for the following reason: Spam. Please contact the administrator if this was done in error.

I’ve always thought spamming involved sending unsolicited messages to multiple users, not a single thread. Has anyone else experienced something similar? Is this a common issue on QQ, or did I just have bad luck?

On top of that, after posting this on r/Fanfiction, it was removed by the moderators because r/Fanfiction is not the place to discuss real-life drama. Now I'm starting to think it’s less about that particular site and more about the internet as a whole. The internet is quietly becoming a walled garden. It’s not just about one platform anymore—it’s the pattern. You get banned for a single, harmless post. A subreddit removes your thread because it’s “real-life drama.” Cumulatively, it creates an environment where you hesitate before posting anything that isn’t perfectly sanitized.

The internet is quietly becoming a walled garden.

I recently created a QQ account and made this single post in the Off-topic -> General board. To my surprise, I got banned a couple hours later for "Spam." My post wasn’t commercial or anything; it was just a genuine discussion.

You have been banned for the following reason: Spam. Please contact the administrator if this was done in error.

I’ve always thought spamming involved sending unsolicited messages to multiple users, not a single thread. Has anyone else experienced something similar? Is this a common issue on QQ, or did I just have bad luck?

On top of that, after posting this on r/Fanfiction, it was removed by the moderators because r/Fanfiction is not the place to discuss real-life drama. Now I'm starting to think it’s less about that particular site and more about the internet as a whole. The internet is quietly becoming a walled garden. It’s not just about one platform anymore—it’s the pattern. You get banned for a single, harmless post. A subreddit removes your thread because it’s “real-life drama.” Cumulatively, it creates an environment where you hesitate before posting anything that isn’t perfectly sanitized.

The internet is quietly becoming a walled garden.

I recently created a QQ account and made this single post in the Off-topic -> General board. To my surprise, I got banned a couple hours later for "Spam." My post wasn’t commercial or anything; it was just a genuine discussion.

You have been banned for the following reason: Spam. Please contact the administrator if this was done in error.

I’ve always thought spamming involved sending unsolicited messages to multiple users, not a single thread. Has anyone else experienced something similar? Is this a common issue on QQ, or did I just have bad luck?

On top of that, after posting this on r/Fanfiction, it was removed by the moderators because r/Fanfiction is not the place to discuss real-life drama. Now I'm starting to think it’s less about that particular site and more about the internet as a whole. The internet is quietly becoming a walled garden. It’s not just about one platform anymore—it’s the pattern. You get banned for a single, harmless post. A subreddit removes your thread because it’s “real-life drama.” Cumulatively, it creates an environment where you hesitate before posting anything that isn’t perfectly sanitized.

Why Heavy Codes of Conduct Are Unnecessary for Open Source Projects

https://shujisado.org/2025/09/30/why-heavy-codes-of-conduct-are-unnecessary-for-most-open-source-projects/

#HackerNews #OpenSource #Conduct #HeavyCodes #CommunityGuidelines #TechEthics

Why Heavy Codes of Conduct Are Unnecessary for Open Source Projects

https://shujisado.org/2025/09/30/why-heavy-codes-of-conduct-are-unnecessary-for-most-open-source-projects/

#HackerNews #OpenSource #Conduct #HeavyCodes #CommunityGuidelines #TechEthics

Why Heavy Codes of Conduct Are Unnecessary for Open Source Projects

https://shujisado.org/2025/09/30/why-heavy-codes-of-conduct-are-unnecessary-for-most-open-source-projects/

#HackerNews #OpenSource #Conduct #HeavyCodes #CommunityGuidelines #TechEthics

Why Heavy Codes of Conduct Are Unnecessary for Open Source Projects

https://shujisado.org/2025/09/30/why-heavy-codes-of-conduct-are-unnecessary-for-most-open-source-projects/

#HackerNews #OpenSource #Conduct #HeavyCodes #CommunityGuidelines #TechEthics

Why Heavy Codes of Conduct Are Unnecessary for Open Source Projects

https://shujisado.org/2025/09/30/why-heavy-codes-of-conduct-are-unnecessary-for-most-open-source-projects/

#HackerNews #OpenSource #Conduct #HeavyCodes #CommunityGuidelines #TechEthics

So, Bluesky is cracking down on moderation, aiming for "healthy conversations." It's like the digital bouncer just got a new rulebook. Does tougher enforcement lead to better communities or just quieter ones?
https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/22/bluesky-says-its-getting-more-aggressive-about-moderation-and-enforcement/
#Bluesky #CommunityGuidelines #TechPolicy #SocialPlatforms

So, Bluesky is cracking down on moderation, aiming for "healthy conversations." It's like the digital bouncer just got a new rulebook. Does tougher enforcement lead to better communities or just quieter ones?
https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/22/bluesky-says-its-getting-more-aggressive-about-moderation-and-enforcement/
#Bluesky #CommunityGuidelines #TechPolicy #SocialPlatforms

So, Bluesky is cracking down on moderation, aiming for "healthy conversations." It's like the digital bouncer just got a new rulebook. Does tougher enforcement lead to better communities or just quieter ones?
https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/22/bluesky-says-its-getting-more-aggressive-about-moderation-and-enforcement/
#Bluesky #CommunityGuidelines #TechPolicy #SocialPlatforms

So, Bluesky is cracking down on moderation, aiming for "healthy conversations." It's like the digital bouncer just got a new rulebook. Does tougher enforcement lead to better communities or just quieter ones?
https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/22/bluesky-says-its-getting-more-aggressive-about-moderation-and-enforcement/
#Bluesky #CommunityGuidelines #TechPolicy #SocialPlatforms

#Discord announced new #TermsOfService #PrivacyPolicy and #CommunityGuidelines updates, effective 25 September 2025. Here is a #DiffChecker comparison on the new ToS as well as a link (in reply comment) to their main discussion of 29 September 2025 updates. #TechNews #TechUpdates #GamingNews

https://www.diffchecker.com/KHwQ0oTH/

#Discord announced new #TermsOfService #PrivacyPolicy and #CommunityGuidelines updates, effective 25 September 2025. Here is a #DiffChecker comparison on the new ToS as well as a link (in reply comment) to their main discussion of 29 September 2025 updates. #TechNews #TechUpdates #GamingNews

https://www.diffchecker.com/KHwQ0oTH/

#Discord announced new #TermsOfService #PrivacyPolicy and #CommunityGuidelines updates, effective 25 September 2025. Here is a #DiffChecker comparison on the new ToS as well as a link (in reply comment) to their main discussion of 29 September 2025 updates. #TechNews #TechUpdates #GamingNews

https://www.diffchecker.com/KHwQ0oTH/

#Discord announced new #TermsOfService #PrivacyPolicy and #CommunityGuidelines updates, effective 25 September 2025. Here is a #DiffChecker comparison on the new ToS as well as a link (in reply comment) to their main discussion of 29 September 2025 updates. #TechNews #TechUpdates #GamingNews

https://www.diffchecker.com/KHwQ0oTH/

TikTok cập nhật bộ tiêu chuẩn cộng đồng mới, tập trung vào việc xử lý nội dung sai lệch, cờ bạc, chất kích thích (rượu, thuốc lá, ma túy), và vũ khí. Người dùng TikTok nên nắm rõ để tuân thủ!
#TikTok #TieuChuanCongDong #AnNinhMang #SocialMedia #CommunityGuidelines #MạngXãHội #QuyTac

https://vietnamnet.vn/tiktok-ra-bo-tieu-chuan-cong-dong-moi-tat-ca-nguoi-dung-can-phai-biet-2433715.html

#TikTok is updating its #CommunityGuidelines, effective 13 September 2025, to clarify rules for #LIVE #creators, including responsibility for #thirdpartytools and disclosure of #commercialcontent. The guidelines also emphasise personalised search results and comments, and clarify the prohibition of misleading #AIgeneratedcontent. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/15/tiktoks-new-guidelines-add-subtle-changes-for-live-creators-ai-content-and-more/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

#TikTok is updating its #CommunityGuidelines, effective 13 September 2025, to clarify rules for #LIVE #creators, including responsibility for #thirdpartytools and disclosure of #commercialcontent. The guidelines also emphasise personalised search results and comments, and clarify the prohibition of misleading #AIgeneratedcontent. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/15/tiktoks-new-guidelines-add-subtle-changes-for-live-creators-ai-content-and-more/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

#TikTok is updating its #CommunityGuidelines, effective 13 September 2025, to clarify rules for #LIVE #creators, including responsibility for #thirdpartytools and disclosure of #commercialcontent. The guidelines also emphasise personalised search results and comments, and clarify the prohibition of misleading #AIgeneratedcontent. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/15/tiktoks-new-guidelines-add-subtle-changes-for-live-creators-ai-content-and-more/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

#TikTok is updating its #CommunityGuidelines, effective 13 September 2025, to clarify rules for #LIVE #creators, including responsibility for #thirdpartytools and disclosure of #commercialcontent. The guidelines also emphasise personalised search results and comments, and clarify the prohibition of misleading #AIgeneratedcontent. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/15/tiktoks-new-guidelines-add-subtle-changes-for-live-creators-ai-content-and-more/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

#TikTok is updating its #CommunityGuidelines, effective 13 September 2025, to clarify rules for #LIVE #creators, including responsibility for #thirdpartytools and disclosure of #commercialcontent. The guidelines also emphasise personalised search results and comments, and clarify the prohibition of misleading #AIgeneratedcontent. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/15/tiktoks-new-guidelines-add-subtle-changes-for-live-creators-ai-content-and-more/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

Bluesky updates community guidelines ahead of October 15 implementation: Decentralized platform seeks community feedback on enhanced safety policies through August 28 as regulatory compliance drives structural changes. https://ppc.land/bluesky-updates-community-guidelines-ahead-of-october-15-implementation/ #Bluesky #CommunityGuidelines #SafetyFirst #Decentralized #Feedback

Bluesky updates community guidelines ahead of October 15 implementation: Decentralized platform seeks community feedback on enhanced safety policies through August 28 as regulatory compliance drives structural changes. https://ppc.land/bluesky-updates-community-guidelines-ahead-of-october-15-implementation/ #Bluesky #CommunityGuidelines #SafetyFirst #Decentralized #Feedback

#Bluesky is revising its #CommunityGuidelines and other #policies to improve #clarity and #detail around user safety procedures and the appeals process. The changes are driven by new #globalregulations and an effort to shape the community towards greater respect and diversity of thought. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/14/bluesky-rolls-out-massive-revamp-to-policies-and-community-guidelines/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

#Bluesky is revising its #CommunityGuidelines and other #policies to improve #clarity and #detail around user safety procedures and the appeals process. The changes are driven by new #globalregulations and an effort to shape the community towards greater respect and diversity of thought. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/14/bluesky-rolls-out-massive-revamp-to-policies-and-community-guidelines/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

#Bluesky is revising its #CommunityGuidelines and other #policies to improve #clarity and #detail around user safety procedures and the appeals process. The changes are driven by new #globalregulations and an effort to shape the community towards greater respect and diversity of thought. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/14/bluesky-rolls-out-massive-revamp-to-policies-and-community-guidelines/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

#Bluesky is revising its #CommunityGuidelines and other #policies to improve #clarity and #detail around user safety procedures and the appeals process. The changes are driven by new #globalregulations and an effort to shape the community towards greater respect and diversity of thought. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/14/bluesky-rolls-out-massive-revamp-to-policies-and-community-guidelines/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

#Bluesky is revising its #CommunityGuidelines and other #policies to improve #clarity and #detail around user safety procedures and the appeals process. The changes are driven by new #globalregulations and an effort to shape the community towards greater respect and diversity of thought. https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/14/bluesky-rolls-out-massive-revamp-to-policies-and-community-guidelines/?eicker.news #tech #media #news

🚨 We've updated the indieweb.social Community Guidelines 🚨

Following consultation with the indieweb.social community we have updated the server Community Guidelines.

Thank you to everyone who offered feedback and helped us fine-tune, especially those who support the server Patreon.

Please become familiar with the new Community Guidelines and boost so your peers are aware of this change too.

#MastoAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines #FediAdmin #Mastodon #Fediverse #Governance

🚨 We've updated the indieweb.social Community Guidelines 🚨

Following consultation with the indieweb.social community we have updated the server Community Guidelines.

Thank you to everyone who offered feedback and helped us fine-tune, especially those who support the server Patreon.

Please become familiar with the new Community Guidelines and boost so your peers are aware of this change too.

#MastoAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines #FediAdmin #Mastodon #Fediverse #Governance

🚨 We've updated the indieweb.social Community Guidelines 🚨

Following consultation with the indieweb.social community we have updated the server Community Guidelines.

Thank you to everyone who offered feedback and helped us fine-tune, especially those who support the server Patreon.

Please become familiar with the new Community Guidelines and boost so your peers are aware of this change too.

#MastoAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines #FediAdmin #Mastodon #Fediverse #Governance

🚨 We've updated the indieweb.social Community Guidelines 🚨

Following consultation with the indieweb.social community we have updated the server Community Guidelines.

Thank you to everyone who offered feedback and helped us fine-tune, especially those who support the server Patreon.

Please become familiar with the new Community Guidelines and boost so your peers are aware of this change too.

#MastoAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines #FediAdmin #Mastodon #Fediverse #Governance

🚨 We've updated the indieweb.social Community Guidelines 🚨

Following consultation with the indieweb.social community we have updated the server Community Guidelines.

Thank you to everyone who offered feedback and helped us fine-tune, especially those who support the server Patreon.

Please become familiar with the new Community Guidelines and boost so your peers are aware of this change too.

#MastoAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines #FediAdmin #Mastodon #Fediverse #Governance

⚠️ Important Notice ⚠️

From July 18th indieweb.social will be updating its Community Guidelines.

We want to make indieweb.social a safe place to be, for everyone. To do that, we’ve made the decision to update the indieweb.social Community Guidelines.

This should make it easier for you to report posts and for us to moderate them!

Please boost across indieweb.social and feel free to email [email protected] if you have any concerns.

#Admin #FediAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines

⚠️ Important Notice ⚠️

From July 18th indieweb.social will be updating its Community Guidelines.

We want to make indieweb.social a safe place to be, for everyone. To do that, we’ve made the decision to update the indieweb.social Community Guidelines.

This should make it easier for you to report posts and for us to moderate them!

Please boost across indieweb.social and feel free to email [email protected] if you have any concerns.

#Admin #FediAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines

⚠️ Important Notice ⚠️

From July 18th indieweb.social will be updating its Community Guidelines.

We want to make indieweb.social a safe place to be, for everyone. To do that, we’ve made the decision to update the indieweb.social Community Guidelines.

This should make it easier for you to report posts and for us to moderate them!

Please boost across indieweb.social and feel free to email [email protected] if you have any concerns.

#Admin #FediAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines

⚠️ Important Notice ⚠️

From July 18th indieweb.social will be updating its Community Guidelines.

We want to make indieweb.social a safe place to be, for everyone. To do that, we’ve made the decision to update the indieweb.social Community Guidelines.

This should make it easier for you to report posts and for us to moderate them!

Please boost across indieweb.social and feel free to email [email protected] if you have any concerns.

#Admin #FediAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines

⚠️ Important Notice ⚠️

From July 18th indieweb.social will be updating its Community Guidelines.

We want to make indieweb.social a safe place to be, for everyone. To do that, we’ve made the decision to update the indieweb.social Community Guidelines.

This should make it easier for you to report posts and for us to moderate them!

Please boost across indieweb.social and feel free to email [email protected] if you have any concerns.

#Admin #FediAdmin #IndieWeb #CommunityGuidelines

When Trash-Talk Becomes Abuse: Examining Problematic Speech/Behavior in Wow

https://tcjournal.org/vol8/jackson/

#HackerNews #TrashTalk #Abuse #OnlineGaming #WoW #CommunityGuidelines #ToxicBehavior

When Trash-Talk Becomes Abuse: Examining Problematic Speech/Behavior in Wow

https://tcjournal.org/vol8/jackson/

#HackerNews #TrashTalk #Abuse #OnlineGaming #WoW #CommunityGuidelines #ToxicBehavior

When Trash-Talk Becomes Abuse: Examining Problematic Speech/Behavior in Wow

https://tcjournal.org/vol8/jackson/

#HackerNews #TrashTalk #Abuse #OnlineGaming #WoW #CommunityGuidelines #ToxicBehavior

When Trash-Talk Becomes Abuse: Examining Problematic Speech/Behavior in Wow

https://tcjournal.org/vol8/jackson/

#HackerNews #TrashTalk #Abuse #OnlineGaming #WoW #CommunityGuidelines #ToxicBehavior

Hi everyone at BSD Cafe,
I’d like to start by thanking everyone for being part of this community - your presence and support truly mean a lot!
This message will appear across all my BSD Cafe social accounts, as I’d like to make sure it reaches everyone. Apologies for the duplication, but I genuinely believe it’s important.

Lately, there have been some discussions and questions surrounding content moderation on our instance, and I wanted to take a moment to offer some clarity and reaffirm the spirit of our community.

As you know, BSD Cafe was founded as a space primarily focused on technology, with a special place for *BSD and open source. More importantly, though, I want it to be a positive, welcoming, and constructive place for everyone. Our community guidelines, especially principles like "Promote Positivity" and "Be Kind", are central to this vision.
I've seen questions arise, sometimes involving accusations of political censorship from different perspectives, regarding why certain posts might be moderated. I want to be very clear on this: My moderation approach focuses primarily on the tone and manner of communication, not the specific topic itself.
I don't intervene simply because a post discusses politics, a particular tech company, or any potentially divisive subject. I do step in when a post, regardless of the topic or the viewpoint being expressed, adopts a tone that is:
* Provocative or intentionally confrontational.
* Aggressive or disrespectful towards other users or groups.
* Overly negative without constructive intent.
* Contrary to our core principles of kindness and mutual respect.
This standard applies equally to everyone and every "side". If someone were to post something like "Users of X software are idiots", I would address that just as readily as any other topic presented in a hostile way, even if I personally dislike software X.
The goal isn't to "censor" opinions, but to preserve an environment where discussions, even critical ones, can happen civilly and respectfully, without descending into flame wars or personal attacks. We aim to be a space that is pro-constructive dialogue and pro-positivity, not anti-anyone.
BSD Cafe is our shared digital home. Let's continue working together to keep it a pleasant and rewarding place where we can share ideas, learn, and connect over our shared passions (tech and beyond!), feeling comfortable and respected.

Thank you sincerely for your understanding and for everything you contribute to making BSD Cafe a special community!
Let's keep building this positive space together.

#BSDCafe #Community #Moderation #Fediverse #InstanceAdmin #CommunityGuidelines #TechCommunity #Positivity #BeKind

Hi everyone at BSD Cafe,
I’d like to start by thanking everyone for being part of this community - your presence and support truly mean a lot!
This message will appear across all my BSD Cafe social accounts, as I’d like to make sure it reaches everyone. Apologies for the duplication, but I genuinely believe it’s important.

Lately, there have been some discussions and questions surrounding content moderation on our instance, and I wanted to take a moment to offer some clarity and reaffirm the spirit of our community.

As you know, BSD Cafe was founded as a space primarily focused on technology, with a special place for *BSD and open source. More importantly, though, I want it to be a positive, welcoming, and constructive place for everyone. Our community guidelines, especially principles like "Promote Positivity" and "Be Kind", are central to this vision.
I've seen questions arise, sometimes involving accusations of political censorship from different perspectives, regarding why certain posts might be moderated. I want to be very clear on this: My moderation approach focuses primarily on the tone and manner of communication, not the specific topic itself.
I don't intervene simply because a post discusses politics, a particular tech company, or any potentially divisive subject. I do step in when a post, regardless of the topic or the viewpoint being expressed, adopts a tone that is:
* Provocative or intentionally confrontational.
* Aggressive or disrespectful towards other users or groups.
* Overly negative without constructive intent.
* Contrary to our core principles of kindness and mutual respect.
This standard applies equally to everyone and every "side". If someone were to post something like "Users of X software are idiots", I would address that just as readily as any other topic presented in a hostile way, even if I personally dislike software X.
The goal isn't to "censor" opinions, but to preserve an environment where discussions, even critical ones, can happen civilly and respectfully, without descending into flame wars or personal attacks. We aim to be a space that is pro-constructive dialogue and pro-positivity, not anti-anyone.
BSD Cafe is our shared digital home. Let's continue working together to keep it a pleasant and rewarding place where we can share ideas, learn, and connect over our shared passions (tech and beyond!), feeling comfortable and respected.

Thank you sincerely for your understanding and for everything you contribute to making BSD Cafe a special community!
Let's keep building this positive space together.

#BSDCafe #Community #Moderation #Fediverse #InstanceAdmin #CommunityGuidelines #TechCommunity #Positivity #BeKind

Hi everyone at BSD Cafe,
I’d like to start by thanking everyone for being part of this community - your presence and support truly mean a lot!
This message will appear across all my BSD Cafe social accounts, as I’d like to make sure it reaches everyone. Apologies for the duplication, but I genuinely believe it’s important.

Lately, there have been some discussions and questions surrounding content moderation on our instance, and I wanted to take a moment to offer some clarity and reaffirm the spirit of our community.

As you know, BSD Cafe was founded as a space primarily focused on technology, with a special place for *BSD and open source. More importantly, though, I want it to be a positive, welcoming, and constructive place for everyone. Our community guidelines, especially principles like "Promote Positivity" and "Be Kind", are central to this vision.
I've seen questions arise, sometimes involving accusations of political censorship from different perspectives, regarding why certain posts might be moderated. I want to be very clear on this: My moderation approach focuses primarily on the tone and manner of communication, not the specific topic itself.
I don't intervene simply because a post discusses politics, a particular tech company, or any potentially divisive subject. I do step in when a post, regardless of the topic or the viewpoint being expressed, adopts a tone that is:
* Provocative or intentionally confrontational.
* Aggressive or disrespectful towards other users or groups.
* Overly negative without constructive intent.
* Contrary to our core principles of kindness and mutual respect.
This standard applies equally to everyone and every "side". If someone were to post something like "Users of X software are idiots", I would address that just as readily as any other topic presented in a hostile way, even if I personally dislike software X.
The goal isn't to "censor" opinions, but to preserve an environment where discussions, even critical ones, can happen civilly and respectfully, without descending into flame wars or personal attacks. We aim to be a space that is pro-constructive dialogue and pro-positivity, not anti-anyone.
BSD Cafe is our shared digital home. Let's continue working together to keep it a pleasant and rewarding place where we can share ideas, learn, and connect over our shared passions (tech and beyond!), feeling comfortable and respected.

Thank you sincerely for your understanding and for everything you contribute to making BSD Cafe a special community!
Let's keep building this positive space together.

#BSDCafe #Community #Moderation #Fediverse #InstanceAdmin #CommunityGuidelines #TechCommunity #Positivity #BeKind

Hi everyone at BSD Cafe,
I’d like to start by thanking everyone for being part of this community - your presence and support truly mean a lot!
This message will appear across all my BSD Cafe social accounts, as I’d like to make sure it reaches everyone. Apologies for the duplication, but I genuinely believe it’s important.

Lately, there have been some discussions and questions surrounding content moderation on our instance, and I wanted to take a moment to offer some clarity and reaffirm the spirit of our community.

As you know, BSD Cafe was founded as a space primarily focused on technology, with a special place for *BSD and open source. More importantly, though, I want it to be a positive, welcoming, and constructive place for everyone. Our community guidelines, especially principles like "Promote Positivity" and "Be Kind", are central to this vision.
I've seen questions arise, sometimes involving accusations of political censorship from different perspectives, regarding why certain posts might be moderated. I want to be very clear on this: My moderation approach focuses primarily on the tone and manner of communication, not the specific topic itself.
I don't intervene simply because a post discusses politics, a particular tech company, or any potentially divisive subject. I do step in when a post, regardless of the topic or the viewpoint being expressed, adopts a tone that is:
* Provocative or intentionally confrontational.
* Aggressive or disrespectful towards other users or groups.
* Overly negative without constructive intent.
* Contrary to our core principles of kindness and mutual respect.
This standard applies equally to everyone and every "side". If someone were to post something like "Users of X software are idiots", I would address that just as readily as any other topic presented in a hostile way, even if I personally dislike software X.
The goal isn't to "censor" opinions, but to preserve an environment where discussions, even critical ones, can happen civilly and respectfully, without descending into flame wars or personal attacks. We aim to be a space that is pro-constructive dialogue and pro-positivity, not anti-anyone.
BSD Cafe is our shared digital home. Let's continue working together to keep it a pleasant and rewarding place where we can share ideas, learn, and connect over our shared passions (tech and beyond!), feeling comfortable and respected.

Thank you sincerely for your understanding and for everything you contribute to making BSD Cafe a special community!
Let's keep building this positive space together.

#BSDCafe #Community #Moderation #Fediverse #InstanceAdmin #CommunityGuidelines #TechCommunity #Positivity #BeKind

Hi everyone at BSD Cafe,
I’d like to start by thanking everyone for being part of this community - your presence and support truly mean a lot!
This message will appear across all my BSD Cafe social accounts, as I’d like to make sure it reaches everyone. Apologies for the duplication, but I genuinely believe it’s important.

Lately, there have been some discussions and questions surrounding content moderation on our instance, and I wanted to take a moment to offer some clarity and reaffirm the spirit of our community.

As you know, BSD Cafe was founded as a space primarily focused on technology, with a special place for *BSD and open source. More importantly, though, I want it to be a positive, welcoming, and constructive place for everyone. Our community guidelines, especially principles like "Promote Positivity" and "Be Kind", are central to this vision.
I've seen questions arise, sometimes involving accusations of political censorship from different perspectives, regarding why certain posts might be moderated. I want to be very clear on this: My moderation approach focuses primarily on the tone and manner of communication, not the specific topic itself.
I don't intervene simply because a post discusses politics, a particular tech company, or any potentially divisive subject. I do step in when a post, regardless of the topic or the viewpoint being expressed, adopts a tone that is:
* Provocative or intentionally confrontational.
* Aggressive or disrespectful towards other users or groups.
* Overly negative without constructive intent.
* Contrary to our core principles of kindness and mutual respect.
This standard applies equally to everyone and every "side". If someone were to post something like "Users of X software are idiots", I would address that just as readily as any other topic presented in a hostile way, even if I personally dislike software X.
The goal isn't to "censor" opinions, but to preserve an environment where discussions, even critical ones, can happen civilly and respectfully, without descending into flame wars or personal attacks. We aim to be a space that is pro-constructive dialogue and pro-positivity, not anti-anyone.
BSD Cafe is our shared digital home. Let's continue working together to keep it a pleasant and rewarding place where we can share ideas, learn, and connect over our shared passions (tech and beyond!), feeling comfortable and respected.

Thank you sincerely for your understanding and for everything you contribute to making BSD Cafe a special community!
Let's keep building this positive space together.

#BSDCafe #Community #Moderation #Fediverse #InstanceAdmin #CommunityGuidelines #TechCommunity #Positivity #BeKind

Hi everyone at BSD Cafe,
I’d like to start by thanking everyone for being part of this community - your presence and support truly mean a lot!
This message will appear across all my BSD Cafe social accounts, as I’d like to make sure it reaches everyone. Apologies for the duplication, but I genuinely believe it’s important.

Lately, there have been some discussions and questions surrounding content moderation on our instance, and I wanted to take a moment to offer some clarity and reaffirm the spirit of our community.

As you know, BSD Cafe was founded as a space primarily focused on technology, with a special place for *BSD and open source. More importantly, though, I want it to be a positive, welcoming, and constructive place for everyone. Our community guidelines, especially principles like "Promote Positivity" and "Be Kind", are central to this vision.
I've seen questions arise, sometimes involving accusations of political censorship from different perspectives, regarding why certain posts might be moderated. I want to be very clear on this: My moderation approach focuses primarily on the tone and manner of communication, not the specific topic itself.
I don't intervene simply because a post discusses politics, a particular tech company, or any potentially divisive subject. I do step in when a post, regardless of the topic or the viewpoint being expressed, adopts a tone that is:
* Provocative or intentionally confrontational.
* Aggressive or disrespectful towards other users or groups.
* Overly negative without constructive intent.
* Contrary to our core principles of kindness and mutual respect.
This standard applies equally to everyone and every "side". If someone were to post something like "Users of X software are idiots", I would address that just as readily as any other topic presented in a hostile way, even if I personally dislike software X.
The goal isn't to "censor" opinions, but to preserve an environment where discussions, even critical ones, can happen civilly and respectfully, without descending into flame wars or personal attacks. We aim to be a space that is pro-constructive dialogue and pro-positivity, not anti-anyone.
BSD Cafe is our shared digital home. Let's continue working together to keep it a pleasant and rewarding place where we can share ideas, learn, and connect over our shared passions (tech and beyond!), feeling comfortable and respected.

Thank you sincerely for your understanding and for everything you contribute to making BSD Cafe a special community!
Let's keep building this positive space together.

#BSDCafe #Community #Moderation #Fediverse #InstanceAdmin #CommunityGuidelines #TechCommunity #Positivity #BeKind

Hi everyone at BSD Cafe,
I’d like to start by thanking everyone for being part of this community - your presence and support truly mean a lot!
This message will appear across all my BSD Cafe social accounts, as I’d like to make sure it reaches everyone. Apologies for the duplication, but I genuinely believe it’s important.

Lately, there have been some discussions and questions surrounding content moderation on our instance, and I wanted to take a moment to offer some clarity and reaffirm the spirit of our community.

As you know, BSD Cafe was founded as a space primarily focused on technology, with a special place for *BSD and open source. More importantly, though, I want it to be a positive, welcoming, and constructive place for everyone. Our community guidelines, especially principles like "Promote Positivity" and "Be Kind", are central to this vision.
I've seen questions arise, sometimes involving accusations of political censorship from different perspectives, regarding why certain posts might be moderated. I want to be very clear on this: My moderation approach focuses primarily on the tone and manner of communication, not the specific topic itself.
I don't intervene simply because a post discusses politics, a particular tech company, or any potentially divisive subject. I do step in when a post, regardless of the topic or the viewpoint being expressed, adopts a tone that is:
* Provocative or intentionally confrontational.
* Aggressive or disrespectful towards other users or groups.
* Overly negative without constructive intent.
* Contrary to our core principles of kindness and mutual respect.
This standard applies equally to everyone and every "side". If someone were to post something like "Users of X software are idiots", I would address that just as readily as any other topic presented in a hostile way, even if I personally dislike software X.
The goal isn't to "censor" opinions, but to preserve an environment where discussions, even critical ones, can happen civilly and respectfully, without descending into flame wars or personal attacks. We aim to be a space that is pro-constructive dialogue and pro-positivity, not anti-anyone.
BSD Cafe is our shared digital home. Let's continue working together to keep it a pleasant and rewarding place where we can share ideas, learn, and connect over our shared passions (tech and beyond!), feeling comfortable and respected.

Thank you sincerely for your understanding and for everything you contribute to making BSD Cafe a special community!
Let's keep building this positive space together.

#BSDCafe #Community #Moderation #Fediverse #InstanceAdmin #CommunityGuidelines #TechCommunity #Positivity #BeKind