#europeanscienceediting — Public Fediverse posts

In this Correspondence article in European Science Editing, Joshua Wang discusses how retractions do not just correct the scientific record, but serve as crucial datapoints that inform meta-research and research education.

Read it in the journal now: https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2024.e140235

#Retractions #MetaResearch #EuropeanScienceEditing #JournalEditing #PublicationEthics

@bahar and Mario Malički have just published their structured peer review checklist in European Science Editing. lt helps researchers to ensure they provide thorough and constructive feedback for each section of a manuscript they review. They also suggest how journal editors and publishers can leverage the checklist throughout their peer review process.

https://ese.arphahub.com/article/137675/

#PeerReview #JournalEditing #EuropeanScienceEditing #AcademicPublishing #ScholarlyPublishing #Checklists #Elsevier

In this new Correspondence article in European Science Editing, Joshua Wang discusses how retractions do not just correct the scientific record, but serve as crucial datapoints that inform meta-research and research education.

Read it in the journal now:
https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2024.e140235

#Retractions #MetaResearch #EuropeanScienceEditing #JournalEditing #PublicationEthics

Article processing charges (APCs) for open access publishing unfairly advantage those with personal, familial, and/or institutional wealth, argues Joshua Wang at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

In this Viewpoint in European Science Editing, Wang says the APC model suppresses the scholarship of PhD students, and disempowers them, and this must be addressed.

https://ese.arphahub.com/article/124173/

#PhDLife #OpenAccess #EuropeanScienceEditing #AcademicPublishing #EquityInOpenAccess #OApublishing

Article processing charges (APCs) for open access publishing unfairly advantage those with personal, familial, and/or institutional wealth, argues Joshua Wang at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

In this Viewpoint in European Science Editing, Wang says the APC model suppresses the scholarship of PhD students, and disempowers them, and this must be addressed.

https://ese.arphahub.com/article/124173/

#PhDLife #OpenAccess #EuropeanScienceEditing #AcademicPublishing #EquityInOpenAccess #OApublishing

Article processing charges (APCs) for open access publishing unfairly advantage those with personal, familial, and/or institutional wealth, argues Joshua Wang at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

In this Viewpoint in European Science Editing, Wang says the APC model suppresses the scholarship of PhD students, and disempowers them, and this must be addressed.

https://ese.arphahub.com/article/124173/

#PhDLife #OpenAccess #EuropeanScienceEditing #AcademicPublishing #EquityInOpenAccess #OApublishing

Article processing charges (APCs) for open access publishing unfairly advantage those with personal, familial, and/or institutional wealth, argues Joshua Wang at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

In this Viewpoint in European Science Editing, Wang says the APC model suppresses the scholarship of PhD students, and disempowers them, and this must be addressed.

https://ese.arphahub.com/article/124173/

#PhDLife #OpenAccess #EuropeanScienceEditing #AcademicPublishing #EquityInOpenAccess #OApublishing

Article processing charges (APCs) for open access publishing unfairly advantage those with personal, familial, and/or institutional wealth, argues Joshua Wang at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

In this Viewpoint in European Science Editing, Wang says the APC model suppresses the scholarship of PhD students, and disempowers them, and this must be addressed.

https://ese.arphahub.com/article/124173/

#PhDLife #OpenAccess #EuropeanScienceEditing #AcademicPublishing #EquityInOpenAccess #OApublishing

New in European Science Editing: Nearly 1/2 of health sciences journals in South Africa don't mention statistics in their instructions for authors or make cursory references. Gina Joubert concludes that editors & publishers must give more detail on reporting requirements for statistical methods in quantitative research articles.
https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2024.e114734
#EuropeanScienceEditing #EASEpublications #HealthStatistics #JournalPublication #ReportingGuidelines #StatisticalMethods #SouthAfrica #Statistics

Artificial intelligence and digital technology may revolutionize peer review and publishing by addressing limitations and fostering collaboration among scholars worldwide. In European Science Editing, Dikran Toroser, Muhammad Sarwar, Lisa DeTora, Laura Dormer, and Maryam Sayab address how academics, policymakers, and the publishing industry can work together to develop ethical, effective #AItools and #DigitalTech.
https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2023.e116106

#PeerReview #ScholarlyPublishing #EuropeanScienceEditing

New in our journal European Science Editing, a Correspondence article from Piero Pollesello and Papp Zoltan offers up an interesting take on the plausibility and practical uses of ChatGPT, along with a healthy portion of cautionary advice.

https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2023.e112023

#ArtificialIntelligence #Editing #SciComm #ChatGPT #TextGeneration #EuropeanScienceEditing #EASEpublications #JournalEditing #ScholComm #AItools

A new Review paper in European Science Editing from Tom Lang discusses the serious impacts of inaccuracies and discrepancies between cited and source materials, and problems of bias in selecting sources.

Advice for when and where sources should be cited is offered.

https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2023.e94153

#EuropeanScienceEditing #TomLang #ScienceEditing #Citations #Referencing #ScienceWriting