home.social

#confounding — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #confounding, aggregated by home.social.

  1. New study uses causal analysis to demonstrate big reductions in carbon emissions if fewer bovines.
    In ten years, methane emissions from all activities if bovine stop would be 80 % of methane emissions from all activities if no intervention.
    Results and causation are presented at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19019693

    #carbon #causality #causalInference #causation #confounding #counterFactuals #emissions #GHG #methane #offPolicy #policy #publicPolicy

  2. New study uses causal analysis to demonstrate big reductions in carbon emissions if fewer bovines.
    In ten years, methane emissions from all activities if bovine stop would be 80 % of methane emissions from all activities if no intervention.
    Results and causation are presented at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19019693

    #carbon #causality #causalInference #causation #confounding #counterFactuals #emissions #GHG #methane #offPolicy #policy #publicPolicy

  3. New study uses causal analysis to demonstrate big reductions in carbon emissions if fewer bovines.
    In ten years, methane emissions from all activities if bovine stop would be 80 % of methane emissions from all activities if no intervention.
    Results and causation are presented at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19019693

    #carbon #causality #causalInference #causation #confounding #counterFactuals #emissions #GHG #methane #offPolicy #policy #publicPolicy

  4. New study uses causal analysis to demonstrate big reductions in carbon emissions if fewer bovines.
    In ten years, methane emissions from all activities if bovine stop would be 80 % of methane emissions from all activities if no intervention.
    Results and causation are presented at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19019693

  5. New study uses causal analysis to demonstrate big reductions in carbon emissions if fewer bovines.
    In ten years, methane emissions from all activities if bovine stop would be 80 % of methane emissions from all activities if no intervention.
    Results and causation are presented at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19019693

    #carbon #causality #causalInference #causation #confounding #counterFactuals #emissions #GHG #methane #offPolicy #policy #publicPolicy

  6. 'Copula-based Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Treatment Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding', by Jiajing Zheng, Alexander D'Amour, Alexander Franks.

    jmlr.org/papers/v26/22-0372.ht

    #confounders #copula #confounding

  7. 'Copula-based Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Treatment Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding', by Jiajing Zheng, Alexander D'Amour, Alexander Franks.

    jmlr.org/papers/v26/22-0372.ht

    #confounders #copula #confounding

  8. 'Copula-based Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Treatment Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding', by Jiajing Zheng, Alexander D'Amour, Alexander Franks.

    jmlr.org/papers/v26/22-0372.ht

    #confounders #copula #confounding

  9. 'Copula-based Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Treatment Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding', by Jiajing Zheng, Alexander D'Amour, Alexander Franks.

    jmlr.org/papers/v26/22-0372.ht

    #confounders #copula #confounding

  10. 'Copula-based Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Treatment Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding', by Jiajing Zheng, Alexander D'Amour, Alexander Franks.

    jmlr.org/papers/v26/22-0372.ht

    #confounders #copula #confounding

  11. 'Data-driven Automated Negative Control Estimation (DANCE): Search for, Validation of, and Causal Inference with Negative Controls', by Erich Kummerfeld, Jaewon Lim, Xu Shi.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/22-1062.ht

    #confounder #causal #confounding

  12. 'Data-driven Automated Negative Control Estimation (DANCE): Search for, Validation of, and Causal Inference with Negative Controls', by Erich Kummerfeld, Jaewon Lim, Xu Shi.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/22-1062.ht

    #confounder #causal #confounding

  13. 'Data-driven Automated Negative Control Estimation (DANCE): Search for, Validation of, and Causal Inference with Negative Controls', by Erich Kummerfeld, Jaewon Lim, Xu Shi.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/22-1062.ht

    #confounder #causal #confounding

  14. 'Data-driven Automated Negative Control Estimation (DANCE): Search for, Validation of, and Causal Inference with Negative Controls', by Erich Kummerfeld, Jaewon Lim, Xu Shi.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/22-1062.ht

    #confounder #causal #confounding

  15. 'Data-driven Automated Negative Control Estimation (DANCE): Search for, Validation of, and Causal Inference with Negative Controls', by Erich Kummerfeld, Jaewon Lim, Xu Shi.

    jmlr.org/papers/v25/22-1062.ht

    #confounder #causal #confounding

  16. Blasting this #Statistics #CausalInference #Confounding question that's vexing me out there into the aether:

    I'm trying to build a Poisson model of a count variable as a function of a set of environmental variables. I have to transform the coefficients into rates by including an offset, as I have different levels of exposure for each measurement. However, I have strong reason to suspect that this offset is also influenced by the same environmental variables.

    Am I screwed?

  17. Blasting this #Statistics #CausalInference #Confounding question that's vexing me out there into the aether:

    I'm trying to build a Poisson model of a count variable as a function of a set of environmental variables. I have to transform the coefficients into rates by including an offset, as I have different levels of exposure for each measurement. However, I have strong reason to suspect that this offset is also influenced by the same environmental variables.

    Am I screwed?

  18. Blasting this #Statistics #CausalInference #Confounding question that's vexing me out there into the aether:

    I'm trying to build a Poisson model of a count variable as a function of a set of environmental variables. I have to transform the coefficients into rates by including an offset, as I have different levels of exposure for each measurement. However, I have strong reason to suspect that this offset is also influenced by the same environmental variables.

    Am I screwed?

  19. Blasting this #Statistics #CausalInference #Confounding question that's vexing me out there into the aether:

    I'm trying to build a Poisson model of a count variable as a function of a set of environmental variables. I have to transform the coefficients into rates by including an offset, as I have different levels of exposure for each measurement. However, I have strong reason to suspect that this offset is also influenced by the same environmental variables.

    Am I screwed?

  20. Blasting this #Statistics #CausalInference #Confounding question that's vexing me out there into the aether:

    I'm trying to build a Poisson model of a count variable as a function of a set of environmental variables. I have to transform the coefficients into rates by including an offset, as I have different levels of exposure for each measurement. However, I have strong reason to suspect that this offset is also influenced by the same environmental variables.

    Am I screwed?

  21. Nature recently introduced new guidelines for studies engaging with questions of race, ethnicity or gender. Among others, it asks researchers to explain how they controlled for #confounding variables. We agree this is important, especially because we think #bias and #disparity should be understood in #causal terms. In this #LSE impact blog, @LudoWaltman and I discuss some of the challenges around this.

    blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial

  22. Nature recently introduced new guidelines for studies engaging with questions of race, ethnicity or gender. Among others, it asks researchers to explain how they controlled for #confounding variables. We agree this is important, especially because we think #bias and #disparity should be understood in #causal terms. In this #LSE impact blog, @LudoWaltman and I discuss some of the challenges around this.

    blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial

  23. Nature recently introduced new guidelines for studies engaging with questions of race, ethnicity or gender. Among others, it asks researchers to explain how they controlled for #confounding variables. We agree this is important, especially because we think #bias and #disparity should be understood in #causal terms. In this #LSE impact blog, @LudoWaltman and I discuss some of the challenges around this.

    blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial

  24. Nature recently introduced new guidelines for studies engaging with questions of race, ethnicity or gender. Among others, it asks researchers to explain how they controlled for #confounding variables. We agree this is important, especially because we think #bias and #disparity should be understood in #causal terms. In this #LSE impact blog, @LudoWaltman and I discuss some of the challenges around this.

    blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial

  25. Nature recently introduced new guidelines for studies engaging with questions of race, ethnicity or gender. Among others, it asks researchers to explain how they controlled for #confounding variables. We agree this is important, especially because we think #bias and #disparity should be understood in #causal terms. In this #LSE impact blog, @LudoWaltman and I discuss some of the challenges around this.

    blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial