#wc3 — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #wc3, aggregated by home.social.
-
How do people not miss the good old #gaming days when we had real communities of everything and we did things just for the heck of it, not because of monetization or some such nonsense.
e.g. the old #halflife mods community, the visions, creativity, ideas! like that MMO whats-its-name, it was all brilliant, all done for free, and now it's all gone.
Or how about the thousands of #wc3 maps, and communities that sprung up around them? like, DotA, Warlock, or Impossible Bosses, or The Black Road?
-
How do people not miss the good old #gaming days when we had real communities of everything and we did things just for the heck of it, not because of monetization or some such nonsense.
e.g. the old #halflife mods community, the visions, creativity, ideas! like that MMO whats-its-name, it was all brilliant, all done for free, and now it's all gone.
Or how about the thousands of #wc3 maps, and communities that sprung up around them? like, DotA, Warlock, or Impossible Bosses, or The Black Road?
-
How do people not miss the good old #gaming days when we had real communities of everything and we did things just for the heck of it, not because of monetization or some such nonsense.
e.g. the old #halflife mods community, the visions, creativity, ideas! like that MMO whats-its-name, it was all brilliant, all done for free, and now it's all gone.
Or how about the thousands of #wc3 maps, and communities that sprung up around them? like, DotA, Warlock, or Impossible Bosses, or The Black Road?
-
How do people not miss the good old #gaming days when we had real communities of everything and we did things just for the heck of it, not because of monetization or some such nonsense.
e.g. the old #halflife mods community, the visions, creativity, ideas! like that MMO whats-its-name, it was all brilliant, all done for free, and now it's all gone.
Or how about the thousands of #wc3 maps, and communities that sprung up around them? like, DotA, Warlock, or Impossible Bosses, or The Black Road?
-
How do people not miss the good old #gaming days when we had real communities of everything and we did things just for the heck of it, not because of monetization or some such nonsense.
e.g. the old #halflife mods community, the visions, creativity, ideas! like that MMO whats-its-name, it was all brilliant, all done for free, and now it's all gone.
Or how about the thousands of #wc3 maps, and communities that sprung up around them? like, DotA, Warlock, or Impossible Bosses, or The Black Road?
-
Warcraft 3: The Frozen Throne: Last Days Of The Alliance
https://piefed.social/c/gamemusic/p/2009056/warcraft-3-the-frozen-throne-last-days-of-the-alliance
-
Warcraft 3: The Frozen Throne: Last Days Of The Alliance
https://piefed.social/c/gamemusic/p/2009056/warcraft-3-the-frozen-throne-last-days-of-the-alliance
-
Warcraft 3: The Frozen Throne: Last Days Of The Alliance
https://piefed.social/c/gamemusic/p/2009056/warcraft-3-the-frozen-throne-last-days-of-the-alliance
-
Warcraft 3: The Frozen Throne: Last Days Of The Alliance
https://piefed.social/c/gamemusic/p/2009056/warcraft-3-the-frozen-throne-last-days-of-the-alliance
-
Warcraft 3: The Frozen Throne: Last Days Of The Alliance
https://piefed.social/c/gamemusic/p/2009056/warcraft-3-the-frozen-throne-last-days-of-the-alliance
-
What happened over the last ten years on our Fediverse path
The first steps were good. #Socialhub emerged as a genuinely grassroots space, shaped to maintain the integrity of the #activertypub native reboot. It grew directly out of the #activertypub affinity group itself - rooted in lived practice rather than imposed structure. So what motivated this native path? The current #openweb reboot wasn’t exactly planned - it was, in many ways, serendipitous. During the #WC3 process, the usual mainstream players were largely absent. That gap created space […]https://hamishcampbell.com/what-happened-over-the-last-ten-years-on-our-fediverse-path/
-
What happened over the last ten years on our Fediverse path
The first steps were good. #Socialhub emerged as a genuinely grassroots space, shaped to maintain the integrity of the #activertypub native reboot. It grew directly out of the #activertypub affinity group itself - rooted in lived practice rather than imposed structure. So what motivated this native path? The current #openweb reboot wasn’t exactly planned - it was, in many ways, serendipitous. During the #WC3 process, the usual mainstream players were largely absent. That gap created space […]https://hamishcampbell.com/what-happened-over-the-last-ten-years-on-our-fediverse-path/
-
What happened over the last ten years on our Fediverse path
The first steps were good. #Socialhub emerged as a genuinely grassroots space, shaped to maintain the integrity of the #activertypub native reboot. It grew directly out of the #activertypub affinity group itself - rooted in lived practice rather than imposed structure. So what motivated this native path? The current #openweb reboot wasn’t exactly planned - it was, in many ways, serendipitous. During the #WC3 process, the usual mainstream players were largely absent. That gap created space […]https://hamishcampbell.com/what-happened-over-the-last-ten-years-on-our-fediverse-path/
-
What happened over the last ten years on our Fediverse path
The first steps were good. #Socialhub emerged as a genuinely grassroots space, shaped to maintain the integrity of the #activertypub native reboot. It grew directly out of the #activertypub affinity group itself - rooted in lived practice rather than imposed structure. So what motivated this native path? The current #openweb reboot wasn’t exactly planned - it was, in many ways, serendipitous. During the #WC3 process, the usual mainstream players were largely absent. That gap created space […]https://hamishcampbell.com/what-happened-over-the-last-ten-years-on-our-fediverse-path/
-
What happened over the last ten years on our Fediverse path
The first steps were good. #Socialhub emerged as a genuinely grassroots space, shaped to maintain the integrity of the #activertypub native reboot. It grew directly out of the #activertypub affinity group itself - rooted in lived practice rather than imposed structure. So what motivated this native path? The current #openweb reboot wasn’t exactly planned - it was, in many ways, serendipitous. During the #WC3 process, the usual mainstream players were largely absent. That gap created space […]https://hamishcampbell.com/what-happened-over-the-last-ten-years-on-our-fediverse-path/
-
Azeroth awaits! ⚔️ Episode 38 of my Warcraft III: Reforged longplay is here! No commentary, just pure WC3 vibes. Come chill and watch! 😌
#Warcraft3 #WarcraftIIIReforged #WC3 #RTS #Gaming #Longplay #NoCommentary #OcktavoYT #Azeroth #Blizzard #PCGaming #ClassicGaming
-
Azeroth is calling! 📣 Episode 36 of my Warcraft III: Reforged longplay is here! No commentary, just the raw strategy and epic battles. Who's ready to relive the glory days? 🏰🔥
#Warcraft3Reforged #Warcraft3 #WC3 #RTS #Gaming #Longplay #NoCommentary #Azeroth #StrategyGame #PCGaming #OcktavoYT
-
Azeroth calls! ⚔️ Another chapter unfolds in Warcraft III: Reforged!
No commentary, just pure WC3 vibes. Who's your favorite hero? Let me know! 👇
#Warcraft3 #Reforged #WC3 #RTS #Gaming #Longplay #NoCommentary #Azeroth #OcktavoYT #PCGaming #StrategyGames
-
( * )< #VoD | 2025 KungFu Cup #2: WC3 Evolution #SC2
Casted by Light_VIP and Yakuzaku | Production by Light_VIPOpen #WC3Evo tournament ft YoungYakov 🇨🇳 Xiaose 🇨🇳 MacSed 🇨🇳 Infi - KarmaPrime
🦆 VoD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-DF3CbXelY&list=PLSzBLbHbYv7tzj7emeU4Is8JxWiBs7C9q
🦆 Live VoD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfBKkYprqWU#StarCraft #StarCraft2 #StarCraftII #SC2VoDs #StarCraftVoDs #EUStarCraft #EuropeanStarCraft #CNStarCraft #ChineseStarCraft #WarCraft3 #WC3 #KFC #SCBoy #esports #RTS #tournament
-
( * )< #VoD | 2025 KungFu Cup #2: WC3 Evolution #SC2
Casted by Light_VIP and Yakuzaku | Production by Light_VIPOpen #WC3Evo tournament ft YoungYakov 🇨🇳 Xiaose 🇨🇳 MacSed 🇨🇳 Infi - KarmaPrime
🦆 VoD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-DF3CbXelY&list=PLSzBLbHbYv7tzj7emeU4Is8JxWiBs7C9q
🦆 Live VoD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfBKkYprqWU#StarCraft #StarCraft2 #StarCraftII #SC2VoDs #StarCraftVoDs #EUStarCraft #EuropeanStarCraft #CNStarCraft #ChineseStarCraft #WarCraft3 #WC3 #KFC #SCBoy #esports #RTS #tournament
-
( * )< #VoD | 2025 KungFu Cup #1: WC3 Evolution #SC2
Casting & production by Light_VIPOpen #WC3Evo mod tournament ft YoungYakov 🇨🇳 Xiaose 🇳🇱 Harstem 🇰🇷 LawLiet 🇩🇰 MaxPax 🇨🇳 MacSed
🦆 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAHwgfIuNEY&list=PLSzBLbHbYv7tzj7emeU4Is8JxWiBs7C9q
🦆 Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2369483705#StarCraft #StarCraft2 #StarCraftII #SC2VoDs #StarCraftVoDs #KRStarCraft #KoreanStarCraft #EUStarCraft #EuropeanStarCraft #CNStarCraft #ChineseStarCraft #WarCraft3 #WC3 #KFC #SCBoy #esports #RTS #tournament
-
( * )< #VoD | 2025 KungFu Cup #1: WC3 Evolution #SC2
Casting & production by Light_VIPOpen #WC3Evo mod tournament ft YoungYakov 🇨🇳 Xiaose 🇳🇱 Harstem 🇰🇷 LawLiet 🇩🇰 MaxPax 🇨🇳 MacSed
🦆 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAHwgfIuNEY&list=PLSzBLbHbYv7tzj7emeU4Is8JxWiBs7C9q
🦆 Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2369483705#StarCraft #StarCraft2 #StarCraftII #SC2VoDs #StarCraftVoDs #KRStarCraft #KoreanStarCraft #EUStarCraft #EuropeanStarCraft #CNStarCraft #ChineseStarCraft #WarCraft3 #WC3 #KFC #SCBoy #esports #RTS #tournament
-
This thinking came out of this thread on the subject of the relationship between #WC3 and the grassroots #socialhub over the “governance” of #ActivityPub and the wider #Fediverse.
A bridge rather than ownership would look like a collaborative, flexible, and trust-based system, rather than one based on control and dominance. In the context of the Fediverse and openweb spaces, this would mean moving away from territorial battles between the #NGO mainstreaming approach and the grassroots #openweb communities, toward a recognition that both paths have value, and that these different paths can coexist and complement each other.
The “commons” path is fundamentally about shared responsibility and decentralized governance. It’s the idea that instead of fighting for ownership and control—whether that’s who gets to steer the Fediverse or dominate the standards—we build systems that mediate the different flows, allowing both the formal and the grassroots approaches to contribute and grow together.
This could manifest in practical ways like:
- Shared Infrastructure: The infrastructure becomes a part of the commons—no one owns it, but everyone can use and contribute to it.
- Collaboration Over Competition: Instead of viewing the relationship between the more formal W3C-style governance and grassroots communities like SocialHub as adversarial, we acknowledge that they bring different strengths. The W3C formalism provides structure, while SocialHub’s grassroots, #DIY ethos brings innovation. Each benefits the other, and the bridge is recognizing this value without the need to “own” it.
- Mediation and Decision-Making Processes: We need native tools for transparent governance. A commons model for governance like the #OGB which was developed on socialhub. Think of it as a flexible process where everyone has a voice, but no one dominates.
- Value in Diversity: The goal is not to impose a singular vision, but to recognize that the messy, bottom-up humanistic creativity from the grassroots and the more polished, structured contributions from #NGOs both have value. The bridge would allow ideas to cross and enrich each other without needlessly flattening their differences.
The key to this is not ownership but bridging the different paths. If we see ourselves as gardeners of the #openweb commons, rather than owners of a “slice” of it, the mindset shifts from control to care, recognizing the power in collaboration rather than domination.
By building these bridges, rather than the normal “common sense” fighting over territory, we create an open network where people and communities can flourish. This bridging needs care, #KISS, trust-based paths, that recognize the shared value and avoid pushing #mainstreaming “common sense” driven artificial divides. It’s about cooperation and connection. #KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid).
https://hamishcampbell.com/we-need-to-build-more-bridges/
#activitypub #diy #fediverse #KISS #mainstreaming #NGO #NGOs #OGB #openweb #socialhub #WC3
-
This thinking came out of this thread on the subject of the relationship between #WC3 and the grassroots #socialhub over the “governance” of #ActivityPub and the wider #Fediverse.
A bridge rather than ownership would look like a collaborative, flexible, and trust-based system, rather than one based on control and dominance. In the context of the Fediverse and openweb spaces, this would mean moving away from territorial battles between the #NGO mainstreaming approach and the grassroots #openweb communities, toward a recognition that both paths have value, and that these different paths can coexist and complement each other.
The “commons” path is fundamentally about shared responsibility and decentralized governance. It’s the idea that instead of fighting for ownership and control—whether that’s who gets to steer the Fediverse or dominate the standards—we build systems that mediate the different flows, allowing both the formal and the grassroots approaches to contribute and grow together.
This could manifest in practical ways like:
- Shared Infrastructure: The infrastructure becomes a part of the commons—no one owns it, but everyone can use and contribute to it.
- Collaboration Over Competition: Instead of viewing the relationship between the more formal W3C-style governance and grassroots communities like SocialHub as adversarial, we acknowledge that they bring different strengths. The W3C formalism provides structure, while SocialHub’s grassroots, #DIY ethos brings innovation. Each benefits the other, and the bridge is recognizing this value without the need to “own” it.
- Mediation and Decision-Making Processes: We need native tools for transparent governance. A commons model for governance like the #OGB which was developed on socialhub. Think of it as a flexible process where everyone has a voice, but no one dominates.
- Value in Diversity: The goal is not to impose a singular vision, but to recognize that the messy, bottom-up humanistic creativity from the grassroots and the more polished, structured contributions from #NGOs both have value. The bridge would allow ideas to cross and enrich each other without needlessly flattening their differences.
The key to this is not ownership but bridging the different paths. If we see ourselves as gardeners of the #openweb commons, rather than owners of a “slice” of it, the mindset shifts from control to care, recognizing the power in collaboration rather than domination.
By building these bridges, rather than the normal “common sense” fighting over territory, we create an open network where people and communities can flourish. This bridging needs care, #KISS, trust-based paths, that recognize the shared value and avoid pushing #mainstreaming “common sense” driven artificial divides. It’s about cooperation and connection. #KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid).
https://hamishcampbell.com/we-need-to-build-more-bridges/
#activitypub #diy #fediverse #KISS #mainstreaming #NGO #NGOs #OGB #openweb #socialhub #WC3
-
This thinking came out of this thread on the subject of the relationship between #WC3 and the grassroots #socialhub over the “governance” of #ActivityPub and the wider #Fediverse.
A bridge rather than ownership would look like a collaborative, flexible, and trust-based system, rather than one based on control and dominance. In the context of the Fediverse and openweb spaces, this would mean moving away from territorial battles between the #NGO mainstreaming approach and the grassroots #openweb communities, toward a recognition that both paths have value, and that these different paths can coexist and complement each other.
The “commons” path is fundamentally about shared responsibility and decentralized governance. It’s the idea that instead of fighting for ownership and control—whether that’s who gets to steer the Fediverse or dominate the standards—we build systems that mediate the different flows, allowing both the formal and the grassroots approaches to contribute and grow together.
This could manifest in practical ways like:
- Shared Infrastructure: The infrastructure becomes a part of the commons—no one owns it, but everyone can use and contribute to it.
- Collaboration Over Competition: Instead of viewing the relationship between the more formal W3C-style governance and grassroots communities like SocialHub as adversarial, we acknowledge that they bring different strengths. The W3C formalism provides structure, while SocialHub’s grassroots, #DIY ethos brings innovation. Each benefits the other, and the bridge is recognizing this value without the need to “own” it.
- Mediation and Decision-Making Processes: We need native tools for transparent governance. A commons model for governance like the #OGB which was developed on socialhub. Think of it as a flexible process where everyone has a voice, but no one dominates.
- Value in Diversity: The goal is not to impose a singular vision, but to recognize that the messy, bottom-up humanistic creativity from the grassroots and the more polished, structured contributions from #NGOs both have value. The bridge would allow ideas to cross and enrich each other without needlessly flattening their differences.
The key to this is not ownership but bridging the different paths. If we see ourselves as gardeners of the #openweb commons, rather than owners of a “slice” of it, the mindset shifts from control to care, recognizing the power in collaboration rather than domination.
By building these bridges, rather than the normal “common sense” fighting over territory, we create an open network where people and communities can flourish. This bridging needs care, #KISS, trust-based paths, that recognize the shared value and avoid pushing #mainstreaming “common sense” driven artificial divides. It’s about cooperation and connection. #KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid).
https://hamishcampbell.com/we-need-to-build-more-bridges/
#activitypub #diy #fediverse #KISS #mainstreaming #NGO #NGOs #OGB #openweb #socialhub #WC3
-
This thinking came out of this thread on the subject of the relationship between #WC3 and the grassroots #socialhub over the “governance” of #ActivityPub and the wider #Fediverse.
A bridge rather than ownership would look like a collaborative, flexible, and trust-based system, rather than one based on control and dominance. In the context of the Fediverse and openweb spaces, this would mean moving away from territorial battles between the #NGO mainstreaming approach and the grassroots #openweb communities, toward a recognition that both paths have value, and that these different paths can coexist and complement each other.
The “commons” path is fundamentally about shared responsibility and decentralized governance. It’s the idea that instead of fighting for ownership and control—whether that’s who gets to steer the Fediverse or dominate the standards—we build systems that mediate the different flows, allowing both the formal and the grassroots approaches to contribute and grow together.
This could manifest in practical ways like:
- Shared Infrastructure: The infrastructure becomes a part of the commons—no one owns it, but everyone can use and contribute to it.
- Collaboration Over Competition: Instead of viewing the relationship between the more formal W3C-style governance and grassroots communities like SocialHub as adversarial, we acknowledge that they bring different strengths. The W3C formalism provides structure, while SocialHub’s grassroots, #DIY ethos brings innovation. Each benefits the other, and the bridge is recognizing this value without the need to “own” it.
- Mediation and Decision-Making Processes: We need native tools for transparent governance. A commons model for governance like the #OGB which was developed on socialhub. Think of it as a flexible process where everyone has a voice, but no one dominates.
- Value in Diversity: The goal is not to impose a singular vision, but to recognize that the messy, bottom-up humanistic creativity from the grassroots and the more polished, structured contributions from #NGOs both have value. The bridge would allow ideas to cross and enrich each other without needlessly flattening their differences.
The key to this is not ownership but bridging the different paths. If we see ourselves as gardeners of the #openweb commons, rather than owners of a “slice” of it, the mindset shifts from control to care, recognizing the power in collaboration rather than domination.
By building these bridges, rather than the normal “common sense” fighting over territory, we create an open network where people and communities can flourish. This bridging needs care, #KISS, trust-based paths, that recognize the shared value and avoid pushing #mainstreaming “common sense” driven artificial divides. It’s about cooperation and connection. #KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid).
https://hamishcampbell.com/we-need-to-build-more-bridges/
#activitypub #diy #fediverse #KISS #mainstreaming #NGO #NGOs #OGB #openweb #socialhub #WC3
-
@evan ahaa.. the agenda is that #ActivityPub is the culture, so the technology is important, but the serendipity that allowed a #lifecult to slip past the #deathcult when the #dotcons people turned up to that first few #WC3 meetings then went away saying nothing interesting here...
The value is the history of how we got there, the spec is a footnote, it's the (cultural) ideas that are embodied in the spec that have the power. And if you dig a little, it's clearly a #counterculture :)
All revolutions are built from this https://hamishcampbell.com/a-tech-story/
Let's nurture this please https://hamishcampbell.com/a-conversation-that-circles/
-
@evan ahaa.. the agenda is that #ActivityPub is the culture, so the technology is important, but the serendipity that allowed a #lifecult to slip past the #deathcult when the #dotcons people turned up to that first few #WC3 meetings then went away saying nothing interesting here...
The value is the history of how we got there, the spec is a footnote, it's the (cultural) ideas that are embodied in the spec that have the power. And if you dig a little, it's clearly a #counterculture :)
All revolutions are built from this https://hamishcampbell.com/a-tech-story/
Let's nurture this please https://hamishcampbell.com/a-conversation-that-circles/
-
@evan ahaa.. the agenda is that #ActivityPub is the culture, so the technology is important, but the serendipity that allowed a #lifecult to slip past the #deathcult when the #dotcons people turned up to that first few #WC3 meetings then went away saying nothing interesting here...
The value is the history of how we got there, the spec is a footnote, it's the (cultural) ideas that are embodied in the spec that have the power. And if you dig a little, it's clearly a #counterculture :)
All revolutions are built from this https://hamishcampbell.com/a-tech-story/
Let's nurture this please https://hamishcampbell.com/a-conversation-that-circles/
-
@evan ahaa.. the agenda is that #ActivityPub is the culture, so the technology is important, but the serendipity that allowed a #lifecult to slip past the #deathcult when the #dotcons people turned up to that first few #WC3 meetings then went away saying nothing interesting here...
The value is the history of how we got there, the spec is a footnote, it's the (cultural) ideas that are embodied in the spec that have the power. And if you dig a little, it's clearly a #counterculture :)
All revolutions are built from this https://hamishcampbell.com/a-tech-story/
Let's nurture this please https://hamishcampbell.com/a-conversation-that-circles/
-
@evan ahaa.. the agenda is that #ActivityPub is the culture, so the technology is important, but the serendipity that allowed a #lifecult to slip past the #deathcult when the #dotcons people turned up to that first few #WC3 meetings then went away saying nothing interesting here...
The value is the history of how we got there, the spec is a footnote, it's the (cultural) ideas that are embodied in the spec that have the power. And if you dig a little, it's clearly a #counterculture :)
All revolutions are built from this https://hamishcampbell.com/a-tech-story/
Let's nurture this please https://hamishcampbell.com/a-conversation-that-circles/
-
You know #TheEverythingApp is just a #WC3 #WebBrowser that's been around for decades & decades & decades, right? 📰🗞️👀
-
You know #TheEverythingApp is just a #WC3 #WebBrowser that's been around for decades & decades & decades, right? 📰🗞️👀
-
You know #TheEverythingApp is just a #WC3 #WebBrowser that's been around for decades & decades & decades, right? 📰🗞️👀
-
You know #TheEverythingApp is just a #WC3 #WebBrowser that's been around for decades & decades & decades, right? 📰🗞️👀
-
You know #TheEverythingApp is just a #WC3 #WebBrowser that's been around for decades & decades & decades, right? 📰🗞️👀
-
Uhm... #ActivityPub is a #WC3 recommended standard published by the Social Web Working Group.
It's a "hobbyist group" project in the same way as #HTML was.
-
Uhm... #ActivityPub is a #WC3 recommended standard published by the Social Web Working Group.
It's a "hobbyist group" project in the same way as #HTML was.
-
Uhm... #ActivityPub is a #WC3 recommended standard published by the Social Web Working Group.
It's a "hobbyist group" project in the same way as #HTML was.
-
Uhm... #ActivityPub is a #WC3 recommended standard published by the Social Web Working Group.
It's a "hobbyist group" project in the same way as #HTML was.
-
Uhm... #ActivityPub is a #WC3 recommended standard published by the Social Web Working Group.
It's a "hobbyist group" project in the same way as #HTML was.
-
Mixed media: reposting here from the ripe-list:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2024-January/003122.html
#Internet #operations & #environmental #sustainability: January links
1. Reporting back from from CCC / 37c3, December 2023
2. Announcing e-impact IETF online session, 15.-16. February
3. W3C plans for 2024
-
Mixed media: reposting here from the ripe-list:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2024-January/003122.html
#Internet #operations & #environmental #sustainability: January links
1. Reporting back from from CCC / 37c3, December 2023
2. Announcing e-impact IETF online session, 15.-16. February
3. W3C plans for 2024
-
Mixed media: reposting here from the ripe-list:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2024-January/003122.html
#Internet #operations & #environmental #sustainability: January links
1. Reporting back from from CCC / 37c3, December 2023
2. Announcing e-impact IETF online session, 15.-16. February
3. W3C plans for 2024
-
Mixed media: reposting here from the ripe-list:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2024-January/003122.html
#Internet #operations & #environmental #sustainability: January links
1. Reporting back from from CCC / 37c3, December 2023
2. Announcing e-impact IETF online session, 15.-16. February
3. W3C plans for 2024
-
Mixed media: reposting here from the ripe-list:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/2024-January/003122.html
#Internet #operations & #environmental #sustainability: January links
1. Reporting back from from CCC / 37c3, December 2023
2. Announcing e-impact IETF online session, 15.-16. February
3. W3C plans for 2024
-
Exotic Wing Commander III bug! In the first scramble mission (B1 or C1) you are automatically assigned three wingmen: Weasel (a scripted death) and then Maniac and Mitchell. If one is shot down, they're replaced by a rotation:. But it doesn't check for duplicates, so you can end up with two Maniacs or two Vagabonds! It's unlikely to ever happen during regular gameplay because there isn't really anything in the mission that will kill six of your wingmen. https://www.wcnews.com/news/2023/12/27/exotic-wc3-bug-produces-interesting-results #retrogaming #wc3
-
Exotic Wing Commander III bug! In the first scramble mission (B1 or C1) you are automatically assigned three wingmen: Weasel (a scripted death) and then Maniac and Mitchell. If one is shot down, they're replaced by a rotation:. But it doesn't check for duplicates, so you can end up with two Maniacs or two Vagabonds! It's unlikely to ever happen during regular gameplay because there isn't really anything in the mission that will kill six of your wingmen. https://www.wcnews.com/news/2023/12/27/exotic-wc3-bug-produces-interesting-results #retrogaming #wc3
-
The tech world spans from grassroots innovation to mainstream integration, and nestled within this spectrum is #Socialhub, initially a grassroots haven rooted in the activertypub framework. Its evolution from #activertypub signifies a unique approach in tech.
The #openweb reboot emerged fortuitously during #WC3, with alternative voices shaping its definition due to the absence of mainstream stakeholders. This atypical path was advantageous for the community's progression.
Initially thriving as a vibrant community hub, recent years have brought challenges. An influx of individuals without a 'native' #openweb view, driven by Twitter immigrants and Fediverse expansion, led to a divergence from the original focus, creating both opportunities and complexities.
A pronounced shift towards tech has overshadowed the necessary social aspects, causing a reduction in the core social-oriented crew. This imbalance mirrors the WC3 process reboot, necessitating a delicate balance between tech and social responsibilities.
The visible shift from community-driven space to an agenda-driven platform poses challenges, requiring a more democratic approach to reconcile these shifts.
Grassroots initiatives are inherently messy, distinguishing their authenticity.
Constructive feedback is crucial for improving the FEP process, which often experiences a 'three steps forward, three steps back' pattern in activism. The need for legitimacy within FEP involves social explanations and wider community buy-in.
Transparent, inclusive processes are crucial, as both FEP and W3C currently lack transparency, risking being sidelined without community involvement.
Activism rooted in history offers lessons to prevent continued ignorance towards these processes, emphasizing the importance of wider social engagement and transparent processes for tech communities like Socialhub. -
The tech world spans from grassroots innovation to mainstream integration, and nestled within this spectrum is #Socialhub, initially a grassroots haven rooted in the activertypub framework. Its evolution from #activertypub signifies a unique approach in tech.
The #openweb reboot emerged fortuitously during #WC3, with alternative voices shaping its definition due to the absence of mainstream stakeholders. This atypical path was advantageous for the community's progression.
Initially thriving as a vibrant community hub, recent years have brought challenges. An influx of individuals without a 'native' #openweb view, driven by Twitter immigrants and Fediverse expansion, led to a divergence from the original focus, creating both opportunities and complexities.
A pronounced shift towards tech has overshadowed the necessary social aspects, causing a reduction in the core social-oriented crew. This imbalance mirrors the WC3 process reboot, necessitating a delicate balance between tech and social responsibilities.
The visible shift from community-driven space to an agenda-driven platform poses challenges, requiring a more democratic approach to reconcile these shifts.
Grassroots initiatives are inherently messy, distinguishing their authenticity.
Constructive feedback is crucial for improving the FEP process, which often experiences a 'three steps forward, three steps back' pattern in activism. The need for legitimacy within FEP involves social explanations and wider community buy-in.
Transparent, inclusive processes are crucial, as both FEP and W3C currently lack transparency, risking being sidelined without community involvement.
Activism rooted in history offers lessons to prevent continued ignorance towards these processes, emphasizing the importance of wider social engagement and transparent processes for tech communities like Socialhub. -
The tech world spans from grassroots innovation to mainstream integration, and nestled within this spectrum is #Socialhub, initially a grassroots haven rooted in the activertypub framework. Its evolution from #activertypub signifies a unique approach in tech.
The #openweb reboot emerged fortuitously during #WC3, with alternative voices shaping its definition due to the absence of mainstream stakeholders. This atypical path was advantageous for the community's progression.
Initially thriving as a vibrant community hub, recent years have brought challenges. An influx of individuals without a 'native' #openweb view, driven by Twitter immigrants and Fediverse expansion, led to a divergence from the original focus, creating both opportunities and complexities.
A pronounced shift towards tech has overshadowed the necessary social aspects, causing a reduction in the core social-oriented crew. This imbalance mirrors the WC3 process reboot, necessitating a delicate balance between tech and social responsibilities.
The visible shift from community-driven space to an agenda-driven platform poses challenges, requiring a more democratic approach to reconcile these shifts.
Grassroots initiatives are inherently messy, distinguishing their authenticity.
Constructive feedback is crucial for improving the FEP process, which often experiences a 'three steps forward, three steps back' pattern in activism. The need for legitimacy within FEP involves social explanations and wider community buy-in.
Transparent, inclusive processes are crucial, as both FEP and W3C currently lack transparency, risking being sidelined without community involvement.
Activism rooted in history offers lessons to prevent continued ignorance towards these processes, emphasizing the importance of wider social engagement and transparent processes for tech communities like Socialhub. -
The tech world spans from grassroots innovation to mainstream integration, and nestled within this spectrum is #Socialhub, initially a grassroots haven rooted in the activertypub framework. Its evolution from #activertypub signifies a unique approach in tech.
The #openweb reboot emerged fortuitously during #WC3, with alternative voices shaping its definition due to the absence of mainstream stakeholders. This atypical path was advantageous for the community's progression.
Initially thriving as a vibrant community hub, recent years have brought challenges. An influx of individuals without a 'native' #openweb view, driven by Twitter immigrants and Fediverse expansion, led to a divergence from the original focus, creating both opportunities and complexities.
A pronounced shift towards tech has overshadowed the necessary social aspects, causing a reduction in the core social-oriented crew. This imbalance mirrors the WC3 process reboot, necessitating a delicate balance between tech and social responsibilities.
The visible shift from community-driven space to an agenda-driven platform poses challenges, requiring a more democratic approach to reconcile these shifts.
Grassroots initiatives are inherently messy, distinguishing their authenticity.
Constructive feedback is crucial for improving the FEP process, which often experiences a 'three steps forward, three steps back' pattern in activism. The need for legitimacy within FEP involves social explanations and wider community buy-in.
Transparent, inclusive processes are crucial, as both FEP and W3C currently lack transparency, risking being sidelined without community involvement.
Activism rooted in history offers lessons to prevent continued ignorance towards these processes, emphasizing the importance of wider social engagement and transparent processes for tech communities like Socialhub. -
The tech world spans from grassroots innovation to mainstream integration, and nestled within this spectrum is #Socialhub, initially a grassroots haven rooted in the activertypub framework. Its evolution from #activertypub signifies a unique approach in tech.
The #openweb reboot emerged fortuitously during #WC3, with alternative voices shaping its definition due to the absence of mainstream stakeholders. This atypical path was advantageous for the community's progression.
Initially thriving as a vibrant community hub, recent years have brought challenges. An influx of individuals without a 'native' #openweb view, driven by Twitter immigrants and Fediverse expansion, led to a divergence from the original focus, creating both opportunities and complexities.
A pronounced shift towards tech has overshadowed the necessary social aspects, causing a reduction in the core social-oriented crew. This imbalance mirrors the WC3 process reboot, necessitating a delicate balance between tech and social responsibilities.
The visible shift from community-driven space to an agenda-driven platform poses challenges, requiring a more democratic approach to reconcile these shifts.
Grassroots initiatives are inherently messy, distinguishing their authenticity.
Constructive feedback is crucial for improving the FEP process, which often experiences a 'three steps forward, three steps back' pattern in activism. The need for legitimacy within FEP involves social explanations and wider community buy-in.
Transparent, inclusive processes are crucial, as both FEP and W3C currently lack transparency, risking being sidelined without community involvement.
Activism rooted in history offers lessons to prevent continued ignorance towards these processes, emphasizing the importance of wider social engagement and transparent processes for tech communities like Socialhub. -
The tech world spans from grassroots innovation to mainstream integration, and nestled within this spectrum is #Socialhub, initially a grassroots haven rooted in the activertypub framework. Its evolution from #activertypub signifies a unique approach in tech.
The #openweb reboot emerged fortuitously during #WC3, with alternative voices shaping its definition due to the absence of mainstream stakeholders. This atypical path was advantageous for the community's progression.
Initially thriving as a vibrant community hub, recent years have brought challenges. An influx of individuals without a 'native' #openweb view, driven by Twitter immigrants and Fediverse expansion, led to a divergence from the original focus, creating both opportunities and complexities.
A pronounced shift towards tech has overshadowed the necessary social aspects, causing a reduction in the core social-oriented crew. This imbalance mirrors the WC3 process reboot, necessitating a delicate balance between tech and social responsibilities.
The visible shift from community-driven space to an agenda-driven platform poses challenges, requiring a more democratic approach to reconcile these shifts.
Grassroots initiatives are inherently messy, distinguishing their authenticity.
Constructive feedback is crucial for improving the FEP process, which often experiences a 'three steps forward, three steps back' pattern in activism. The need for legitimacy within FEP involves social explanations and wider community buy-in.
Transparent, inclusive processes are crucial, as both FEP and W3C currently lack transparency, risking being sidelined without community involvement.
Activism rooted in history offers lessons to prevent continued ignorance towards these processes, emphasizing the importance of wider social engagement and transparent processes for tech communities like Socialhub.
