#too-far — Public Fediverse posts

FDT and FU for voting for him #duet #toofar #trump #jesus #christian #antichrist #religion #christians #duet #YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40tx0lhiTIg

FDT and FU for voting for him #duet #toofar #trump #jesus #christian #antichrist #religion #christians #duet #YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40tx0lhiTIg

FDT and FU for voting for him #duet #toofar #trump #jesus #christian #antichrist #religion #christians #duet #YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40tx0lhiTIg

FDT and FU for voting for him #duet #toofar #trump #jesus #christian #antichrist #religion #christians #duet #YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40tx0lhiTIg

FDT and FU for voting for him #duet #toofar #trump #jesus #christian #antichrist #religion #christians #duet #YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40tx0lhiTIg

Now, I'm all about vintage computers -- vintage Apple's above most others, in fact. And I have a cadre of mechanical keyboards here on hand.

However ...

https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-vintage-computer-aluminum-alloy-artisan-keycap

#WTF #keycaps #keyboards #Macintosh #vintagemac #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #nostalgia #toofar #didntstoptothinkiftheyshould #funny #tech #geek #boards

Now, I'm all about vintage computers -- vintage Apple's above most others, in fact. And I have a cadre of mechanical keyboards here on hand.

However ...

https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-vintage-computer-aluminum-alloy-artisan-keycap

#WTF #keycaps #keyboards #Macintosh #vintagemac #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #nostalgia #toofar #didntstoptothinkiftheyshould #funny #tech #geek #boards

Now, I'm all about vintage computers -- vintage Apple's above most others, in fact. And I have a cadre of mechanical keyboards here on hand.

However ...

https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-vintage-computer-aluminum-alloy-artisan-keycap

#WTF #keycaps #keyboards #Macintosh #vintagemac #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #nostalgia #toofar #didntstoptothinkiftheyshould #funny #tech #geek #boards

Now, I'm all about vintage computers -- vintage Apple's above most others, in fact. And I have a cadre of mechanical keyboards here on hand.

However ...

https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-vintage-computer-aluminum-alloy-artisan-keycap

#WTF #keycaps #keyboards #Macintosh #vintagemac #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #nostalgia #toofar #didntstoptothinkiftheyshould #funny #tech #geek #boards

Now, I'm all about vintage computers -- vintage Apple's above most others, in fact. And I have a cadre of mechanical keyboards here on hand.

However ...

https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-vintage-computer-aluminum-alloy-artisan-keycap

#WTF #keycaps #keyboards #Macintosh #vintagemac #vintagecomputing #retrocomputing #nostalgia #toofar #didntstoptothinkiftheyshould #funny #tech #geek #boards

Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far – Vox

• Politics

The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss

Even some of the Court’s Republicans ruled that his attempt to use troops against US citizens went too far.

by Ian Millhiser, Dec 23, 2025, 1:50 PM PST

Supreme Court justices stand during President Donald Trump’s second inauguration, Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Ian Millhiseris a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.

The same Supreme Court that ruled that President Donald Trump is allowed to use the powers of the presidency to commit crimes finally placed a meaningful limit on Trump’s authority on Tuesday.

In Trump v. Illinois, three Republican justices joined all three of the Court’s Democrats in ruling that Trump violated federal law when he deployed a few hundred members of the National Guard to squelch protests outside of an immigration detention facility in Broadview, Illinois, which is about 12 miles west of Chicago.

SCOTUS, Explained

Notably, however, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate opinion saying he would have ruled against Trump on very narrow grounds. So, it appears that only a bare majority of the justices voted to place significant limits on Trump’s authority to deploy the military against Americans located on US soil.

Trump attempted to use the military against a small number of protesters outside of the Broadview facility. According to Judge April Perry, a federal district judge who previously heard this case, “the typical number of protestors is fewer than fifty,” and “the crowd has never exceeded 200.”

Nevertheless, Trump claimed the authority to use National Guard members against this minor protest under a federal law that permits the federal government to take command of the Guard (which is ordinarily controlled by states) if there is “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States” or if “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The Supreme Court’s Tuesday order does not even engage with Trump’s implausible claim that several dozen people protesting an immigration facility (some of whom have been charged with crimes) constitute a “rebellion.” Instead, it focuses largely on Trump’s claim that he could deploy the Guard because he is “unable” to execute US law without it.

The first part of the Court’s response to Trump is a bit alarming. The Court’s order explains that the words “regular forces,” as it is used by the relevant statute, “likely refers to the regular forces of the United States military.” Thus, Trump cannot use the National Guard unless he is somehow unable to enforce the law by using the full might of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.

This argument could be troubling, because it seems to goad Trump into actually attempting to use the regular Army or Marines on political protesters. But, the Court’s Illinois order also contains some language suggesting that his power to use the regular military is also limited.

The circumstances when Trump may do so, the Court explains, are “exceptional.” That is because a separate federal law prohibits the military from “execut[ing] the laws” outside of “cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.” And, as the Court’s brief order notes, Trump “has not invoked a statute” that permits him to use the regular military to execute the laws.

That said, the Illinois order is unlikely to be the end of this conflict. As Kavanaugh notes in his separate opinion, Trump might attempt to deploy regular troops under the Insurrection Act, which permits the military to “suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” — but only in limited circumstances.

The Justice Department has long interpreted these circumstances very narrowly. A 1964 memorandum signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, for example, indicates that the Insurrection Act may only be invoked when “those engaging in violence are either acting with the approval of state authorities or have, like the Klan in the 1870s, taken over effective control of the area involved.”

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far | Vox

Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far – Vox

• Politics

The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss

Even some of the Court’s Republicans ruled that his attempt to use troops against US citizens went too far.

by Ian Millhiser, Dec 23, 2025, 1:50 PM PST

Supreme Court justices stand during President Donald Trump’s second inauguration, Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Ian Millhiseris a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.

The same Supreme Court that ruled that President Donald Trump is allowed to use the powers of the presidency to commit crimes finally placed a meaningful limit on Trump’s authority on Tuesday.

In Trump v. Illinois, three Republican justices joined all three of the Court’s Democrats in ruling that Trump violated federal law when he deployed a few hundred members of the National Guard to squelch protests outside of an immigration detention facility in Broadview, Illinois, which is about 12 miles west of Chicago.

SCOTUS, Explained

Notably, however, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate opinion saying he would have ruled against Trump on very narrow grounds. So, it appears that only a bare majority of the justices voted to place significant limits on Trump’s authority to deploy the military against Americans located on US soil.

Trump attempted to use the military against a small number of protesters outside of the Broadview facility. According to Judge April Perry, a federal district judge who previously heard this case, “the typical number of protestors is fewer than fifty,” and “the crowd has never exceeded 200.”

Nevertheless, Trump claimed the authority to use National Guard members against this minor protest under a federal law that permits the federal government to take command of the Guard (which is ordinarily controlled by states) if there is “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States” or if “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The Supreme Court’s Tuesday order does not even engage with Trump’s implausible claim that several dozen people protesting an immigration facility (some of whom have been charged with crimes) constitute a “rebellion.” Instead, it focuses largely on Trump’s claim that he could deploy the Guard because he is “unable” to execute US law without it.

The first part of the Court’s response to Trump is a bit alarming. The Court’s order explains that the words “regular forces,” as it is used by the relevant statute, “likely refers to the regular forces of the United States military.” Thus, Trump cannot use the National Guard unless he is somehow unable to enforce the law by using the full might of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.

This argument could be troubling, because it seems to goad Trump into actually attempting to use the regular Army or Marines on political protesters. But, the Court’s Illinois order also contains some language suggesting that his power to use the regular military is also limited.

The circumstances when Trump may do so, the Court explains, are “exceptional.” That is because a separate federal law prohibits the military from “execut[ing] the laws” outside of “cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.” And, as the Court’s brief order notes, Trump “has not invoked a statute” that permits him to use the regular military to execute the laws.

That said, the Illinois order is unlikely to be the end of this conflict. As Kavanaugh notes in his separate opinion, Trump might attempt to deploy regular troops under the Insurrection Act, which permits the military to “suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” — but only in limited circumstances.

The Justice Department has long interpreted these circumstances very narrowly. A 1964 memorandum signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, for example, indicates that the Insurrection Act may only be invoked when “those engaging in violence are either acting with the approval of state authorities or have, like the Klan in the 1870s, taken over effective control of the area involved.”

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far | Vox

Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far – Vox

• Politics

The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss

Even some of the Court’s Republicans ruled that his attempt to use troops against US citizens went too far.

by Ian Millhiser, Dec 23, 2025, 1:50 PM PST

Supreme Court justices stand during President Donald Trump’s second inauguration, Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Ian Millhiseris a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.

The same Supreme Court that ruled that President Donald Trump is allowed to use the powers of the presidency to commit crimes finally placed a meaningful limit on Trump’s authority on Tuesday.

In Trump v. Illinois, three Republican justices joined all three of the Court’s Democrats in ruling that Trump violated federal law when he deployed a few hundred members of the National Guard to squelch protests outside of an immigration detention facility in Broadview, Illinois, which is about 12 miles west of Chicago.

SCOTUS, Explained

Notably, however, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate opinion saying he would have ruled against Trump on very narrow grounds. So, it appears that only a bare majority of the justices voted to place significant limits on Trump’s authority to deploy the military against Americans located on US soil.

Trump attempted to use the military against a small number of protesters outside of the Broadview facility. According to Judge April Perry, a federal district judge who previously heard this case, “the typical number of protestors is fewer than fifty,” and “the crowd has never exceeded 200.”

Nevertheless, Trump claimed the authority to use National Guard members against this minor protest under a federal law that permits the federal government to take command of the Guard (which is ordinarily controlled by states) if there is “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States” or if “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The Supreme Court’s Tuesday order does not even engage with Trump’s implausible claim that several dozen people protesting an immigration facility (some of whom have been charged with crimes) constitute a “rebellion.” Instead, it focuses largely on Trump’s claim that he could deploy the Guard because he is “unable” to execute US law without it.

The first part of the Court’s response to Trump is a bit alarming. The Court’s order explains that the words “regular forces,” as it is used by the relevant statute, “likely refers to the regular forces of the United States military.” Thus, Trump cannot use the National Guard unless he is somehow unable to enforce the law by using the full might of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.

This argument could be troubling, because it seems to goad Trump into actually attempting to use the regular Army or Marines on political protesters. But, the Court’s Illinois order also contains some language suggesting that his power to use the regular military is also limited.

The circumstances when Trump may do so, the Court explains, are “exceptional.” That is because a separate federal law prohibits the military from “execut[ing] the laws” outside of “cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.” And, as the Court’s brief order notes, Trump “has not invoked a statute” that permits him to use the regular military to execute the laws.

That said, the Illinois order is unlikely to be the end of this conflict. As Kavanaugh notes in his separate opinion, Trump might attempt to deploy regular troops under the Insurrection Act, which permits the military to “suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” — but only in limited circumstances.

The Justice Department has long interpreted these circumstances very narrowly. A 1964 memorandum signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, for example, indicates that the Insurrection Act may only be invoked when “those engaging in violence are either acting with the approval of state authorities or have, like the Klan in the 1870s, taken over effective control of the area involved.”

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far | Vox

Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far – Vox

• Politics

The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss

Even some of the Court’s Republicans ruled that his attempt to use troops against US citizens went too far.

by Ian Millhiser, Dec 23, 2025, 1:50 PM PST

Supreme Court justices stand during President Donald Trump’s second inauguration, Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Ian Millhiseris a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.

The same Supreme Court that ruled that President Donald Trump is allowed to use the powers of the presidency to commit crimes finally placed a meaningful limit on Trump’s authority on Tuesday.

In Trump v. Illinois, three Republican justices joined all three of the Court’s Democrats in ruling that Trump violated federal law when he deployed a few hundred members of the National Guard to squelch protests outside of an immigration detention facility in Broadview, Illinois, which is about 12 miles west of Chicago.

SCOTUS, Explained

Notably, however, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate opinion saying he would have ruled against Trump on very narrow grounds. So, it appears that only a bare majority of the justices voted to place significant limits on Trump’s authority to deploy the military against Americans located on US soil.

Trump attempted to use the military against a small number of protesters outside of the Broadview facility. According to Judge April Perry, a federal district judge who previously heard this case, “the typical number of protestors is fewer than fifty,” and “the crowd has never exceeded 200.”

Nevertheless, Trump claimed the authority to use National Guard members against this minor protest under a federal law that permits the federal government to take command of the Guard (which is ordinarily controlled by states) if there is “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States” or if “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The Supreme Court’s Tuesday order does not even engage with Trump’s implausible claim that several dozen people protesting an immigration facility (some of whom have been charged with crimes) constitute a “rebellion.” Instead, it focuses largely on Trump’s claim that he could deploy the Guard because he is “unable” to execute US law without it.

The first part of the Court’s response to Trump is a bit alarming. The Court’s order explains that the words “regular forces,” as it is used by the relevant statute, “likely refers to the regular forces of the United States military.” Thus, Trump cannot use the National Guard unless he is somehow unable to enforce the law by using the full might of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.

This argument could be troubling, because it seems to goad Trump into actually attempting to use the regular Army or Marines on political protesters. But, the Court’s Illinois order also contains some language suggesting that his power to use the regular military is also limited.

The circumstances when Trump may do so, the Court explains, are “exceptional.” That is because a separate federal law prohibits the military from “execut[ing] the laws” outside of “cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.” And, as the Court’s brief order notes, Trump “has not invoked a statute” that permits him to use the regular military to execute the laws.

That said, the Illinois order is unlikely to be the end of this conflict. As Kavanaugh notes in his separate opinion, Trump might attempt to deploy regular troops under the Insurrection Act, which permits the military to “suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” — but only in limited circumstances.

The Justice Department has long interpreted these circumstances very narrowly. A 1964 memorandum signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, for example, indicates that the Insurrection Act may only be invoked when “those engaging in violence are either acting with the approval of state authorities or have, like the Klan in the 1870s, taken over effective control of the area involved.”

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far | Vox

Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far – Vox

• Politics

The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss

Even some of the Court’s Republicans ruled that his attempt to use troops against US citizens went too far.

by Ian Millhiser, Dec 23, 2025, 1:50 PM PST

Supreme Court justices stand during President Donald Trump’s second inauguration, Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Ian Millhiseris a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.

The same Supreme Court that ruled that President Donald Trump is allowed to use the powers of the presidency to commit crimes finally placed a meaningful limit on Trump’s authority on Tuesday.

In Trump v. Illinois, three Republican justices joined all three of the Court’s Democrats in ruling that Trump violated federal law when he deployed a few hundred members of the National Guard to squelch protests outside of an immigration detention facility in Broadview, Illinois, which is about 12 miles west of Chicago.

SCOTUS, Explained

Notably, however, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate opinion saying he would have ruled against Trump on very narrow grounds. So, it appears that only a bare majority of the justices voted to place significant limits on Trump’s authority to deploy the military against Americans located on US soil.

Trump attempted to use the military against a small number of protesters outside of the Broadview facility. According to Judge April Perry, a federal district judge who previously heard this case, “the typical number of protestors is fewer than fifty,” and “the crowd has never exceeded 200.”

Nevertheless, Trump claimed the authority to use National Guard members against this minor protest under a federal law that permits the federal government to take command of the Guard (which is ordinarily controlled by states) if there is “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States” or if “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The Supreme Court’s Tuesday order does not even engage with Trump’s implausible claim that several dozen people protesting an immigration facility (some of whom have been charged with crimes) constitute a “rebellion.” Instead, it focuses largely on Trump’s claim that he could deploy the Guard because he is “unable” to execute US law without it.

The first part of the Court’s response to Trump is a bit alarming. The Court’s order explains that the words “regular forces,” as it is used by the relevant statute, “likely refers to the regular forces of the United States military.” Thus, Trump cannot use the National Guard unless he is somehow unable to enforce the law by using the full might of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.

This argument could be troubling, because it seems to goad Trump into actually attempting to use the regular Army or Marines on political protesters. But, the Court’s Illinois order also contains some language suggesting that his power to use the regular military is also limited.

The circumstances when Trump may do so, the Court explains, are “exceptional.” That is because a separate federal law prohibits the military from “execut[ing] the laws” outside of “cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.” And, as the Court’s brief order notes, Trump “has not invoked a statute” that permits him to use the regular military to execute the laws.

That said, the Illinois order is unlikely to be the end of this conflict. As Kavanaugh notes in his separate opinion, Trump might attempt to deploy regular troops under the Insurrection Act, which permits the military to “suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” — but only in limited circumstances.

The Justice Department has long interpreted these circumstances very narrowly. A 1964 memorandum signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, for example, indicates that the Insurrection Act may only be invoked when “those engaging in violence are either acting with the approval of state authorities or have, like the Klan in the 1870s, taken over effective control of the area involved.”

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Supreme Court says Trump’s attempt to use the military on Americans went too far | Vox

@aliceamour truly #creative! It could be my #overactive #imagination but I get a #sense of #resignation from this #photo. The way the #subject blends in with the #vines but also a sense of a failed #attempt to #escape with the #break in the #vines so #close but yet #toofar. #nice #work

@aliceamour truly #creative! It could be my #overactive #imagination but I get a #sense of #resignation from this #photo. The way the #subject blends in with the #vines but also a sense of a failed #attempt to #escape with the #break in the #vines so #close but yet #toofar. #nice #work

@aliceamour truly #creative! It could be my #overactive #imagination but I get a #sense of #resignation from this #photo. The way the #subject blends in with the #vines but also a sense of a failed #attempt to #escape with the #break in the #vines so #close but yet #toofar. #nice #work

@aliceamour truly #creative! It could be my #overactive #imagination but I get a #sense of #resignation from this #photo. The way the #subject blends in with the #vines but also a sense of a failed #attempt to #escape with the #break in the #vines so #close but yet #toofar. #nice #work

Which horror film crossed the line for you and why?

#HorrorMovies #CreepyCinema #TooFar Hey horror buffs! 🎃 Let’s dive into a spine-chilling topic today: horror movies that crossed the line. What’s one film that left you feeling like they just went too far? Was it the graphic violence? ⚔️ Disturbing themes? 😱 Or maybe it was something unexpected that just didn’t sit right? 🤔 For […]
https://mymetric360.com/question/which-horror-film-crossed-the-line-for-you-and-why/?fsp_sid=9059

I wanna see someone get a whole DOOM LAN party going on inside that case.

#WTF #toofar #PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

I wanna see someone get a whole DOOM LAN party going on inside that case.

#WTF #toofar #PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

I wanna see someone get a whole DOOM LAN party going on inside that case.

#WTF #toofar #PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

I wanna see someone get a whole DOOM LAN party going on inside that case.

#WTF #toofar #PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

I wanna see someone get a whole DOOM LAN party going on inside that case.

#WTF #toofar #PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

So, it has come to this.

I am wandering the aisles of MicroCenter and see this setup -- well beyond the now-common RGB, every fan in the case and the CPU cooler itself has a small LCD display showing video on it.

#WTF #toofar

#PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

So, it has come to this.

I am wandering the aisles of MicroCenter and see this setup -- well beyond the now-common RGB, every fan in the case and the CPU cooler itself has a small LCD display showing video on it.

#WTF #toofar

#PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

So, it has come to this.

I am wandering the aisles of MicroCenter and see this setup -- well beyond the now-common RGB, every fan in the case and the CPU cooler itself has a small LCD display showing video on it.

#WTF #toofar

#PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

So, it has come to this.

I am wandering the aisles of MicroCenter and see this setup -- well beyond the now-common RGB, every fan in the case and the CPU cooler itself has a small LCD display showing video on it.

#WTF #toofar

#PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

So, it has come to this.

I am wandering the aisles of MicroCenter and see this setup -- well beyond the now-common RGB, every fan in the case and the CPU cooler itself has a small LCD display showing video on it.

#WTF #toofar

#PCgaming #build #PCbuilding #PCparts #MicroCenter #RGB #battlestation #gaming #gamers #retrail #tech

How far can too far go?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMaXIUgtX2w

https://word.undead-network.de/2024/07/12/how-far-can-too-far-go-3/
#australia #music #toofar #useme

How far can too far go?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMaXIUgtX2w

https://word.undead-network.de/2024/07/12/how-far-can-too-far-go-3/
#australia #music #toofar #useme

You know that the political pendulum swings from left to right and back again over time, but ... hey! who took the pendulum!?

#toofar

You know that the political pendulum swings from left to right and back again over time, but ... hey! who took the pendulum!?

#toofar

You know that the political pendulum swings from left to right and back again over time, but ... hey! who took the pendulum!?

#toofar

You know that the political pendulum swings from left to right and back again over time, but ... hey! who took the pendulum!?

#toofar

You know that the political pendulum swings from left to right and back again over time, but ... hey! who took the pendulum!?

#toofar

Has Facebook missed the mark with its 'Comment with AI' feature? It allows people to generate a comment with the help of AI, in their chosen style (casual, heartfelt, supportive, etc.). Would you use it in your business?

#AI #Facebook #TooFar https://www.techtimes.com/articles/303759/20240418/facebook-comment-ai-feature-now-live-reports-claim-bad.htm

Has Facebook missed the mark with its 'Comment with AI' feature? It allows people to generate a comment with the help of AI, in their chosen style (casual, heartfelt, supportive, etc.). Would you use it in your business?

#AI #Facebook #TooFar https://www.techtimes.com/articles/303759/20240418/facebook-comment-ai-feature-now-live-reports-claim-bad.htm

Has Facebook missed the mark with its 'Comment with AI' feature? It allows people to generate a comment with the help of AI, in their chosen style (casual, heartfelt, supportive, etc.). Would you use it in your business?

#AI #Facebook #TooFar https://www.techtimes.com/articles/303759/20240418/facebook-comment-ai-feature-now-live-reports-claim-bad.htm

Has Facebook missed the mark with its 'Comment with AI' feature? It allows people to generate a comment with the help of AI, in their chosen style (casual, heartfelt, supportive, etc.). Would you use it in your business?

#AI #Facebook #TooFar https://www.techtimes.com/articles/303759/20240418/facebook-comment-ai-feature-now-live-reports-claim-bad.htm

Slow to the news of the AlphaTauri name change. I am bizarrely upset by this and far from promoting Visa Cash App- I will avoid using it at all costs for this grotesque overstep. I am disappointed in Redbull approving this. Its going to be hard for me to root for either team now. That is how unhappy I am with their decision. Leave the advertisements on the cars and out of the general sport commentary. #F1 #AlphaTauri #Redbull #formula1 #Disappointed #capitalism #TooFar #Overstep

Slow to the news of the AlphaTauri name change. I am bizarrely upset by this and far from promoting Visa Cash App- I will avoid using it at all costs for this grotesque overstep. I am disappointed in Redbull approving this. Its going to be hard for me to root for either team now. That is how unhappy I am with their decision. Leave the advertisements on the cars and out of the general sport commentary. #F1 #AlphaTauri #Redbull #formula1 #Disappointed #capitalism #TooFar #Overstep

Slow to the news of the AlphaTauri name change. I am bizarrely upset by this and far from promoting Visa Cash App- I will avoid using it at all costs for this grotesque overstep. I am disappointed in Redbull approving this. Its going to be hard for me to root for either team now. That is how unhappy I am with their decision. Leave the advertisements on the cars and out of the general sport commentary. #F1 #AlphaTauri #Redbull #formula1 #Disappointed #capitalism #TooFar #Overstep

Slow to the news of the AlphaTauri name change. I am bizarrely upset by this and far from promoting Visa Cash App- I will avoid using it at all costs for this grotesque overstep. I am disappointed in Redbull approving this. Its going to be hard for me to root for either team now. That is how unhappy I am with their decision. Leave the advertisements on the cars and out of the general sport commentary. #F1 #AlphaTauri #Redbull #formula1 #Disappointed #capitalism #TooFar #Overstep

Slow to the news of the AlphaTauri name change. I am bizarrely upset by this and far from promoting Visa Cash App- I will avoid using it at all costs for this grotesque overstep. I am disappointed in Redbull approving this. Its going to be hard for me to root for either team now. That is how unhappy I am with their decision. Leave the advertisements on the cars and out of the general sport commentary. #F1 #AlphaTauri #Redbull #formula1 #Disappointed #capitalism #TooFar #Overstep

@spytfyre @emsquared #TooFar

"Tact in audacity is knowing how far you can go without going too far." — Jean Cocteau — — — #JeanCocteau #quote #quotes #tact #audacity #tactful #toofar #overdo

i really wonder..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykJ1XDTVCfs

https://word.undead-network.de/2023/07/05/i-really-wonder-2/
#cramps #punk #rockabilly #toofar

i really wonder..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykJ1XDTVCfs

https://word.undead-network.de/2023/07/05/i-really-wonder-2/
#cramps #punk #rockabilly #toofar

i really wonder..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykJ1XDTVCfs

https://word.undead-network.de/2023/07/05/i-really-wonder-2/
#cramps #punk #rockabilly #toofar

i really wonder..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykJ1XDTVCfs

https://word.undead-network.de/2023/07/05/i-really-wonder-2/
#cramps #punk #rockabilly #toofar

@OlgaPatlyuk #Negotiations will happen when #Russia is out of #Ukraine and Russia #Capitulates and accepts #Defeat on Ukraine, we have gone #TooFar, and we are too involved, to settle for less than that. #Russia's coming defeat will send to #China the right message too.

@OlgaPatlyuk #Negotiations will happen when #Russia is out of #Ukraine and Russia #Capitulates and accepts #Defeat on Ukraine, we have gone #TooFar, and we are too involved, to settle for less than that. #Russia's coming defeat will send to #China the right message too.

@OlgaPatlyuk #Negotiations will happen when #Russia is out of #Ukraine and Russia #Capitulates and accepts #Defeat on Ukraine, we have gone #TooFar, and we are too involved, to settle for less than that. #Russia's coming defeat will send to #China the right message too.

@OlgaPatlyuk #Negotiations will happen when #Russia is out of #Ukraine and Russia #Capitulates and accepts #Defeat on Ukraine, we have gone #TooFar, and we are too involved, to settle for less than that. #Russia's coming defeat will send to #China the right message too.

@hbons Something something forcing people to the far right...? #toofar

@hbons Something something forcing people to the far right...? #toofar

@hbons Something something forcing people to the far right...? #toofar

@hbons Something something forcing people to the far right...? #toofar