#rulesbasedorder — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #rulesbasedorder, aggregated by home.social.
-
I think it is important for anyone looking to understand the world we live in to have not only an #OpenMind, but to be able to see things from another perspective. So here is an interesting summary of where this world of ours might be in the next 10 years, written by Thomas des Garets Geddes, of crystal ball gazing from the #Chinese perspective (Source: Sinification on substack Follow the link to the article in James Farqharsan’s restack here. https://substack.com/@jamesfarquharson186716 )
1. US–China bipolarity will become firmly entrenched. The US will maintain an overall lead, dominating cyberspace, services and international influence, whilst China will dominate the physical economy, manufacturing and military scale.
2. Middle powers, including the EU and India, will reject ideological camps in favour of pragmatic, “issue-based alignment” [问题性结盟], navigating between the two superpower ecosystems.
3. Fuelled by populism, trade protectionism and the normalisation of “might makes right”, the current “counter-globalisation order” [逆全球化秩序] will reach its peak during the second Trump administration.
4. By 2035, prolonged political fragmentation and widespread popular dissatisfaction with almost two decades of counter-globalisation will generate global demand for a new international order grounded in basic moral principles.
5. AI-driven excess production and entrenched protectionism will fracture global markets, pushing states towards “club-style” coordination and cause a long-term shift away from the dollar towards gold and other currencies.
6. Cyberspace will supersede physical territory as the primary geopolitical arena, stratifying the globe into three tiers: intelligent technology standard-setters (the US and China), innovators and AI application economies.
7. The mutual estrangement of the US and Chinese R&D sectors will result in two distinct global digital standards and market spheres, while also reflecting a pattern of “homogenised development” [同质性发展] as the US increasingly mimics Chinese industrial policy.
8. The growing lethality of intelligent weapons, combined with nuclear deterrence, will constrain major powers to cyber operations. Yet the lower immediate lethality of such operations may increase the frequency of unmanned cyberattacks and conflict.
9, China should transition its diplomatic focus to cyberspace, encouraging enterprises to “go out” [走出去] via a “produce locally, consume locally” [当地生产当地消费] model to bypass protectionism and internationalise its tech standards.
10. To secure its global standing and achieve “high-quality opening up” [高水平对外开放], China must actively mitigate domestic populist currents and attract foreign research talent through institutional reform.#InternationalRelations #Economics #RulesBasedOrder #China
#GeoPolitics #SuperPowers #Ideology #Politics #ProfYanXuetong -
I think it is important for anyone looking to understand the world we live in to have not only an #OpenMind, but to be able to see things from another perspective. So here is an interesting summary of where this world of ours might be in the next 10 years, written by Thomas des Garets Geddes, of crystal ball gazing from the #Chinese perspective (Source: Sinification on substack Follow the link to the article in James Farqharsan’s restack here. https://substack.com/@jamesfarquharson186716 )
1. US–China bipolarity will become firmly entrenched. The US will maintain an overall lead, dominating cyberspace, services and international influence, whilst China will dominate the physical economy, manufacturing and military scale.
2. Middle powers, including the EU and India, will reject ideological camps in favour of pragmatic, “issue-based alignment” [问题性结盟], navigating between the two superpower ecosystems.
3. Fuelled by populism, trade protectionism and the normalisation of “might makes right”, the current “counter-globalisation order” [逆全球化秩序] will reach its peak during the second Trump administration.
4. By 2035, prolonged political fragmentation and widespread popular dissatisfaction with almost two decades of counter-globalisation will generate global demand for a new international order grounded in basic moral principles.
5. AI-driven excess production and entrenched protectionism will fracture global markets, pushing states towards “club-style” coordination and cause a long-term shift away from the dollar towards gold and other currencies.
6. Cyberspace will supersede physical territory as the primary geopolitical arena, stratifying the globe into three tiers: intelligent technology standard-setters (the US and China), innovators and AI application economies.
7. The mutual estrangement of the US and Chinese R&D sectors will result in two distinct global digital standards and market spheres, while also reflecting a pattern of “homogenised development” [同质性发展] as the US increasingly mimics Chinese industrial policy.
8. The growing lethality of intelligent weapons, combined with nuclear deterrence, will constrain major powers to cyber operations. Yet the lower immediate lethality of such operations may increase the frequency of unmanned cyberattacks and conflict.
9, China should transition its diplomatic focus to cyberspace, encouraging enterprises to “go out” [走出去] via a “produce locally, consume locally” [当地生产当地消费] model to bypass protectionism and internationalise its tech standards.
10. To secure its global standing and achieve “high-quality opening up” [高水平对外开放], China must actively mitigate domestic populist currents and attract foreign research talent through institutional reform.#InternationalRelations #Economics #RulesBasedOrder #China
#GeoPolitics #SuperPowers #Ideology #Politics #ProfYanXuetong -
I think it is important for anyone looking to understand the world we live in to have not only an #OpenMind, but to be able to see things from another perspective. So here is an interesting summary of where this world of ours might be in the next 10 years, written by Thomas des Garets Geddes, of crystal ball gazing from the #Chinese perspective (Source: Sinification on substack Follow the link to the article in James Farqharsan’s restack here. https://substack.com/@jamesfarquharson186716 )
1. US–China bipolarity will become firmly entrenched. The US will maintain an overall lead, dominating cyberspace, services and international influence, whilst China will dominate the physical economy, manufacturing and military scale.
2. Middle powers, including the EU and India, will reject ideological camps in favour of pragmatic, “issue-based alignment” [问题性结盟], navigating between the two superpower ecosystems.
3. Fuelled by populism, trade protectionism and the normalisation of “might makes right”, the current “counter-globalisation order” [逆全球化秩序] will reach its peak during the second Trump administration.
4. By 2035, prolonged political fragmentation and widespread popular dissatisfaction with almost two decades of counter-globalisation will generate global demand for a new international order grounded in basic moral principles.
5. AI-driven excess production and entrenched protectionism will fracture global markets, pushing states towards “club-style” coordination and cause a long-term shift away from the dollar towards gold and other currencies.
6. Cyberspace will supersede physical territory as the primary geopolitical arena, stratifying the globe into three tiers: intelligent technology standard-setters (the US and China), innovators and AI application economies.
7. The mutual estrangement of the US and Chinese R&D sectors will result in two distinct global digital standards and market spheres, while also reflecting a pattern of “homogenised development” [同质性发展] as the US increasingly mimics Chinese industrial policy.
8. The growing lethality of intelligent weapons, combined with nuclear deterrence, will constrain major powers to cyber operations. Yet the lower immediate lethality of such operations may increase the frequency of unmanned cyberattacks and conflict.
9, China should transition its diplomatic focus to cyberspace, encouraging enterprises to “go out” [走出去] via a “produce locally, consume locally” [当地生产当地消费] model to bypass protectionism and internationalise its tech standards.
10. To secure its global standing and achieve “high-quality opening up” [高水平对外开放], China must actively mitigate domestic populist currents and attract foreign research talent through institutional reform.#InternationalRelations #Economics #RulesBasedOrder #China
#GeoPolitics #SuperPowers #Ideology #Politics #ProfYanXuetong -
I think it is important for anyone looking to understand the world we live in to have not only an #OpenMind, but to be able to see things from another perspective. So here is an interesting summary of where this world of ours might be in the next 10 years, written by Thomas des Garets Geddes, of crystal ball gazing from the #Chinese perspective (Source: Sinification on substack Follow the link to the article in James Farqharsan’s restack here. https://substack.com/@jamesfarquharson186716 )
1. US–China bipolarity will become firmly entrenched. The US will maintain an overall lead, dominating cyberspace, services and international influence, whilst China will dominate the physical economy, manufacturing and military scale.
2. Middle powers, including the EU and India, will reject ideological camps in favour of pragmatic, “issue-based alignment” [问题性结盟], navigating between the two superpower ecosystems.
3. Fuelled by populism, trade protectionism and the normalisation of “might makes right”, the current “counter-globalisation order” [逆全球化秩序] will reach its peak during the second Trump administration.
4. By 2035, prolonged political fragmentation and widespread popular dissatisfaction with almost two decades of counter-globalisation will generate global demand for a new international order grounded in basic moral principles.
5. AI-driven excess production and entrenched protectionism will fracture global markets, pushing states towards “club-style” coordination and cause a long-term shift away from the dollar towards gold and other currencies.
6. Cyberspace will supersede physical territory as the primary geopolitical arena, stratifying the globe into three tiers: intelligent technology standard-setters (the US and China), innovators and AI application economies.
7. The mutual estrangement of the US and Chinese R&D sectors will result in two distinct global digital standards and market spheres, while also reflecting a pattern of “homogenised development” [同质性发展] as the US increasingly mimics Chinese industrial policy.
8. The growing lethality of intelligent weapons, combined with nuclear deterrence, will constrain major powers to cyber operations. Yet the lower immediate lethality of such operations may increase the frequency of unmanned cyberattacks and conflict.
9, China should transition its diplomatic focus to cyberspace, encouraging enterprises to “go out” [走出去] via a “produce locally, consume locally” [当地生产当地消费] model to bypass protectionism and internationalise its tech standards.
10. To secure its global standing and achieve “high-quality opening up” [高水平对外开放], China must actively mitigate domestic populist currents and attract foreign research talent through institutional reform.#InternationalRelations #Economics #RulesBasedOrder #China
#GeoPolitics #SuperPowers #Ideology #Politics #ProfYanXuetong -
Not Reporting A War Part 2
Pete Hegseth is the Peter Principle applied to the largest weapons arsenal in human history. Pine Gap guides the missiles. Australian-made F-35 parts are in the payload. And our media calls it a partnership. Part Two of Urban Wronski’s investigation into what Australia’s press is not reporting, and what our silence is costing.https://urbanwronski.com/2026/04/12/not-reporting-a-war-part-2/
-
https://www.europesays.com/iran/46105/ The Iran war and the death of the global maritime commons #InternationalLaw #IranWar #MaritimeSecurity #PersianGulf #RulesBasedOrder #StraitOfHormuz
-
I don't like the regime in Iran, but must stop bending the facts: Russia illegally invaded Ukraine. Israel & US illegally started a war on Iran. Is have illegally invaded Gaza & Lebanon. If we mean something by the #RulesBasedOrder it has to apply to all in equal measure! US & Israel >
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5ba3zjugf4kis434frdolgr3/post/3mhxyetbgks2a -
I don't like the regime in Iran, but must stop bending the facts: Russia illegally invaded Ukraine. Israel & US illegally started a war on Iran. Is have illegally invaded Gaza & Lebanon. If we mean something by the #RulesBasedOrder it has to apply to all in equal measure! US & Israel >
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5ba3zjugf4kis434frdolgr3/post/3mhxyetbgks2a -
I don't like the regime in Iran, but must stop bending the facts: Russia illegally invaded Ukraine. Israel & US illegally started a war on Iran. Is have illegally invaded Gaza & Lebanon. If we mean something by the #RulesBasedOrder it has to apply to all in equal measure! US & Israel >
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5ba3zjugf4kis434frdolgr3/post/3mhxyetbgks2a -
I don't like the regime in Iran, but must stop bending the facts: Russia illegally invaded Ukraine. Israel & US illegally started a war on Iran. Is have illegally invaded Gaza & Lebanon. If we mean something by the #RulesBasedOrder it has to apply to all in equal measure! US & Israel >
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5ba3zjugf4kis434frdolgr3/post/3mhxyetbgks2a -
I don't like the regime in Iran, but must stop bending the facts: Russia illegally invaded Ukraine. Israel & US illegally started a war on Iran. Is have illegally invaded Gaza & Lebanon. If we mean something by the #RulesBasedOrder it has to apply to all in equal measure! US & Israel >
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5ba3zjugf4kis434frdolgr3/post/3mhxyetbgks2a -
While the slavery UN resolution passed by a healthy 123 in for it, 3 against and 52 abstaining.
The three actively against were Israel, Argentina and the US.
The 52 abstain was made up primarily of the European block with a notable supporter of reparations, Ukraine, not having much to say on this clear and present need for reparations.
The "rules based order" at work I guess
#EU #Europe #Slavery #AfricanDiaspora #Reparations #Ukraine #NAFO #Ghana #EUPol #RulesBasedOrder
-
While the slavery UN resolution passed by a healthy 123 in for it, 3 against and 52 abstaining.
The three actively against were Israel, Argentina and the US.
The 52 abstain was made up primarily of the European block with a notable supporter of reparations, Ukraine, not having much to say on this clear and present need for reparations.
The "rules based order" at work I guess
#EU #Europe #Slavery #AfricanDiaspora #Reparations #Ukraine #NAFO #Ghana #EUPol #RulesBasedOrder
-
While the slavery UN resolution passed by a healthy 123 in for it, 3 against and 52 abstaining.
The three actively against were Israel, Argentina and the US.
The 52 abstain was made up primarily of the European block with a notable supporter of reparations, Ukraine, not having much to say on this clear and present need for reparations.
The "rules based order" at work I guess
#EU #Europe #Slavery #AfricanDiaspora #Reparations #Ukraine #NAFO #Ghana #EUPol #RulesBasedOrder
-
While the slavery UN resolution passed by a healthy 123 in for it, 3 against and 52 abstaining.
The three actively against were Israel, Argentina and the US.
The 52 abstain was made up primarily of the European block with a notable supporter of reparations, Ukraine, not having much to say on this clear and present need for reparations.
The "rules based order" at work I guess
#EU #Europe #Slavery #AfricanDiaspora #Reparations #Ukraine #NAFO #Ghana #EUPol #RulesBasedOrder
-
While the slavery UN resolution passed by a healthy 123 in for it, 3 against and 52 abstaining.
The three actively against were Israel, Argentina and the US.
The 52 abstain was made up primarily of the European block with a notable supporter of reparations, Ukraine, not having much to say on this clear and present need for reparations.
The "rules based order" at work I guess
#EU #Europe #Slavery #AfricanDiaspora #Reparations #Ukraine #NAFO #Ghana #EUPol #RulesBasedOrder
-
What I don't understand about articles like this:
Why isn't an #EU that forcefully takes the position that this violates #internationalwar, tharulesbasedorder to conduct business according to int. law, that will react to actors & threats not adhering to int. law accordingly and therefore stay out of this considered a viable end state?
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-middle-east-iran-war-security-defense-energy/ #Iran #USA #rulesbasedorder
-
What I don't understand about articles like this:
Why isn't an #EU that forcefully takes the position that this violates #internationalwar, tharulesbasedorder to conduct business according to int. law, that will react to actors & threats not adhering to int. law accordingly and therefore stay out of this considered a viable end state?
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-middle-east-iran-war-security-defense-energy/ #Iran #USA #rulesbasedorder
-
What I don't understand about articles like this:
Why isn't an #EU that forcefully takes the position that this violates #internationalwar, tharulesbasedorder to conduct business according to int. law, that will react to actors & threats not adhering to int. law accordingly and therefore stay out of this considered a viable end state?
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-middle-east-iran-war-security-defense-energy/ #Iran #USA #rulesbasedorder
-
What I don't understand about articles like this:
Why isn't an #EU that forcefully takes the position that this violates #internationalwar, tharulesbasedorder to conduct business according to int. law, that will react to actors & threats not adhering to int. law accordingly and therefore stay out of this considered a viable end state?
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-middle-east-iran-war-security-defense-energy/ #Iran #USA #rulesbasedorder
-
What I don't understand about articles like this:
Why isn't an #EU that forcefully takes the position that this violates #internationalwar, tharulesbasedorder to conduct business according to int. law, that will react to actors & threats not adhering to int. law accordingly and therefore stay out of this considered a viable end state?
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-middle-east-iran-war-security-defense-energy/ #Iran #USA #rulesbasedorder
-
Ii object to our governments blaming rules they put in place following WWII to prevent wars for current wars. It is not following their rules that creates problems but their breaching them and wanting to avoid responsibility for them. Do the crime you too must do the time. #RulesBasedOrder
-
Ii object to our governments blaming rules they put in place following WWII to prevent wars for current wars. It is not following their rules that creates problems but their breaching them and wanting to avoid responsibility for them. Do the crime you too must do the time. #RulesBasedOrder
-
Ii object to our governments blaming rules they put in place following WWII to prevent wars for current wars. It is not following their rules that creates problems but their breaching them and wanting to avoid responsibility for them. Do the crime you too must do the time. #RulesBasedOrder
-
Ii object to our governments blaming rules they put in place following WWII to prevent wars for current wars. It is not following their rules that creates problems but their breaching them and wanting to avoid responsibility for them. Do the crime you too must do the time. #RulesBasedOrder
-
Ii object to our governments blaming rules they put in place following WWII to prevent wars for current wars. It is not following their rules that creates problems but their breaching them and wanting to avoid responsibility for them. Do the crime you too must do the time. #RulesBasedOrder
-
#Australia’s shameless support for the #US attack on #Iran makes us gullible, duplicitous, or both.
The ease and speed with which Australia, along with #Britain and #Canada, fell in behind #Trump’s #attack on Iran was startling.
For a country that is constantly trumpeting the essentiality of the #international #rulesbasedorder in preserving global peace and stability, Australia is #shameless in its ability to slide into the #American slipstream. #auspol #Albanese
-
#Australia’s shameless support for the #US attack on #Iran makes us gullible, duplicitous, or both.
The ease and speed with which Australia, along with #Britain and #Canada, fell in behind #Trump’s #attack on Iran was startling.
For a country that is constantly trumpeting the essentiality of the #international #rulesbasedorder in preserving global peace and stability, Australia is #shameless in its ability to slide into the #American slipstream. #auspol #Albanese
-
#Australia’s shameless support for the #US attack on #Iran makes us gullible, duplicitous, or both.
The ease and speed with which Australia, along with #Britain and #Canada, fell in behind #Trump’s #attack on Iran was startling.
For a country that is constantly trumpeting the essentiality of the #international #rulesbasedorder in preserving global peace and stability, Australia is #shameless in its ability to slide into the #American slipstream. #auspol #Albanese
-
#Australia’s shameless support for the #US attack on #Iran makes us gullible, duplicitous, or both.
The ease and speed with which Australia, along with #Britain and #Canada, fell in behind #Trump’s #attack on Iran was startling.
For a country that is constantly trumpeting the essentiality of the #international #rulesbasedorder in preserving global peace and stability, Australia is #shameless in its ability to slide into the #American slipstream. #auspol #Albanese
-
#Australia’s shameless support for the #US attack on #Iran makes us gullible, duplicitous, or both.
The ease and speed with which Australia, along with #Britain and #Canada, fell in behind #Trump’s #attack on Iran was startling.
For a country that is constantly trumpeting the essentiality of the #international #rulesbasedorder in preserving global peace and stability, Australia is #shameless in its ability to slide into the #American slipstream. #auspol #Albanese
-
CW: Israel-Iran War
If Israel and the US can bomb Iran because they don't like Iran, then why can't Russia bomb Ukraine because they don't like Ukraine?
You either have rules about such things, or you don't.
And call me old fashioned if you like, but I would rather live in a world where we have rules.
-
CW: Israel-Iran War
If Israel and the US can bomb Iran because they don't like Iran, then why can't Russia bomb Ukraine because they don't like Ukraine?
You either have rules about such things, or you don't.
And call me old fashioned if you like, but I would rather live in a world where we have rules.
-
CW: Israel-Iran War
If Israel and the US can bomb Iran because they don't like Iran, then why can't Russia bomb Ukraine because they don't like Ukraine?
You either have rules about such things, or you don't.
And call me old fashioned if you like, but I would rather live in a world where we have rules.
-
CW: Israel-Iran War
If Israel and the US can bomb Iran because they don't like Iran, then why can't Russia bomb Ukraine because they don't like Ukraine?
You either have rules about such things, or you don't.
And call me old fashioned if you like, but I would rather live in a world where we have rules.
-
CW: Israel-Iran War
If Israel and the US can bomb Iran because they don't like Iran, then why can't Russia bomb Ukraine because they don't like Ukraine?
You either have rules about such things, or you don't.
And call me old fashioned if you like, but I would rather live in a world where we have rules.
-
Supporting ‘illegal aggression’ against #Iran ‘the worst thing’ #Australia could do, international law experts say.
Ben Saul says ‘rolling over’ after #Israel & #US #attack is counterproductive for middle powers because it #undermines #rulesbasedorder. #auspol #USPol
-
Supporting ‘illegal aggression’ against #Iran ‘the worst thing’ #Australia could do, international law experts say.
Ben Saul says ‘rolling over’ after #Israel & #US #attack is counterproductive for middle powers because it #undermines #rulesbasedorder. #auspol #USPol
-
Supporting ‘illegal aggression’ against #Iran ‘the worst thing’ #Australia could do, international law experts say.
Ben Saul says ‘rolling over’ after #Israel & #US #attack is counterproductive for middle powers because it #undermines #rulesbasedorder. #auspol #USPol
-
Supporting ‘illegal aggression’ against #Iran ‘the worst thing’ #Australia could do, international law experts say.
Ben Saul says ‘rolling over’ after #Israel & #US #attack is counterproductive for middle powers because it #undermines #rulesbasedorder. #auspol #USPol
