home.social

#interfering — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #interfering, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The US administration is charging a #journalist for reporting on a protest at a #Minnesota church in January. The charges are based on a never-applied section of
    “the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994…The law includes a previously unused provision that prohibits #interfering with the exercise of religious freedom at a place of worship.”

    This same provision could be used to protect minority worshipers from #ice raids at a house of worship.

    theguardian.com/us-news/2026/a

  2. Evening, I have just been reading that the putrid #manbaby is doing all he can, yet again to destroy the #USA from the inside, #killing hundreds of acres of #woodland so that his #AI plans for #World #Domination are realised.

    I am sending you all my love and good vibes for the fight against such ridiculous #nonsense.

    #Breaking #News: he can't seem to stop himself from #interfering and #sucking #up to Putin in every way possible.

    Why can't someone rid us of this #irksome mouth breather.

  3. (17/N) Finally, two threat types that refer to security more than privacy:

    #Obstructing

    An adversary destroys, withdraws, steals or misappropriates information, access, or resources. The obstruction can be temporary or permanent, partial or total. Obstructing can also occur unintentionally, with the “adversary” being deterioration, malfunction, or disaster.

    #Interfering

    An adversary deliberately corrupts the integrity or authenticity of information, resources, processes, or interactions. The respective information, resources, processes, or interactions aren’t necessarily controlled or owned by the persons that are affected, and may also be fabricated. Interfering can also occur unintentionally, with the “adversary” being deterioration, malfunction, or disaster.

    Start of this thread:
    mastodon.de/@tuxwise/113503228

    #ThreatModeling #4D

  4. (14/N) Having familiarized ourselves with categories of adversaries, their main goals and their respective, overall "modus operandi", let's look at the types of threats posed by them.

    Again, it pays to focus on types of threats: We don't want to become mainly alert-triggered, but proactive. There are several frameworks we can borrow ideas from, most notably the LINDDUN framework that is geared toward threats to privacy, and can be extended a bit to cover more ground.

    First, our list of threat types:

    Our definitions of these, for our context:

    Linking

    An adversary can figure out connections and relationships between formerly isolated items of interest.

    Identifiying

    An adversary can link items of interest directly to a natural person.

    (to be continued)

    Start of this thread:
    mastodon.de/@tuxwise/113503228

    LINDDUN:
    linddun.org/

    #ThreatModeling #4D

  5. 'There was a report in September 2022 by the #Bulgarian National Security Agency, and it directly accused #Russia of increasing its #intelligence activities in #Bulgaria. Even of #interfering in #elections, interfering in #media using agents of influence, both in government institutions, in security services, and in the media, and this is this is something that has been officially stated, it was the only country mentioned in this report as having an anti Bulgarian activity.'

  6. @tiffanycli the *concept* of hashtags are good, the execution is bad. I’d much rather add structured tags to posts to organize them (and help others find and subscribe to topics) but not have them #inyourface #interfering with #readability