home.social

#gtkwave — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #gtkwave, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Создаем I2C Master Controller на Verilog. Тестируем ядро

    По результатам написания прошлой статьи у нас получился объемный модуль для реализации функций низкоуровневого управления шиной I2C, который формирует управление линиями SCL/SDA, поддерживает мониторинг шины, ведет передачу и прием данных. В этой статье я предлагаю организовать полноценное вдумчивое тестирование всего что получилось. Всем заинтересованным - добро пожаловать под кат! 🙂

    habr.com/ru/companies/beget/ar

    #verilog #verilator #iverilog #gtkwave #i2c_master_controller #testbench #icarus_verilog

  2. Создаем I2C Master Controller на Verilog. Тестируем ядро

    По результатам написания прошлой статьи у нас получился объемный модуль для реализации функций низкоуровневого управления шиной I2C, который формирует управление линиями SCL/SDA, поддерживает мониторинг шины, ведет передачу и прием данных. В этой статье я предлагаю организовать полноценное вдумчивое тестирование всего что получилось. Всем заинтересованным - добро пожаловать под кат! 🙂

    habr.com/ru/companies/beget/ar

    #verilog #verilator #iverilog #gtkwave #i2c_master_controller #testbench #icarus_verilog

  3. Создаем I2C Master Controller на Verilog. Тестируем ядро

    По результатам написания прошлой статьи у нас получился объемный модуль для реализации функций низкоуровневого управления шиной I2C, который формирует управление линиями SCL/SDA, поддерживает мониторинг шины, ведет передачу и прием данных. В этой статье я предлагаю организовать полноценное вдумчивое тестирование всего что получилось. Всем заинтересованным - добро пожаловать под кат! 🙂

    habr.com/ru/companies/beget/ar

    #verilog #verilator #iverilog #gtkwave #i2c_master_controller #testbench #icarus_verilog

  4. Создаем I2C Master Controller на Verilog. Тестируем ядро

    По результатам написания прошлой статьи у нас получился объемный модуль для реализации функций низкоуровневого управления шиной I2C, который формирует управление линиями SCL/SDA, поддерживает мониторинг шины, ведет передачу и прием данных. В этой статье я предлагаю организовать полноценное вдумчивое тестирование всего что получилось. Всем заинтересованным - добро пожаловать под кат! 🙂

    habr.com/ru/companies/beget/ar

    #verilog #verilator #iverilog #gtkwave #i2c_master_controller #testbench #icarus_verilog

  5. So what can you do with the ability to read arbitrary #FPGA registers out of your design over #UART? Capture time series data (last four #ethernet packet bytes) in your regs and write a little #python script that launches #GTKWave and you have yourself a tiny homemade cross platform logic analyzer thing!
    github.com/JulianKemmerer/Pipe

  6. So what can you do with the ability to read arbitrary registers out of your design over ? Capture time series data (last four packet bytes) in your regs and write a little script that launches and you have yourself a tiny homemade cross platform logic analyzer thing!
    github.com/JulianKemmerer/Pipe

  7. So what can you do with the ability to read arbitrary #FPGA registers out of your design over #UART? Capture time series data (last four #ethernet packet bytes) in your regs and write a little #python script that launches #GTKWave and you have yourself a tiny homemade cross platform logic analyzer thing!
    github.com/JulianKemmerer/Pipe

  8. So what can you do with the ability to read arbitrary #FPGA registers out of your design over #UART? Capture time series data (last four #ethernet packet bytes) in your regs and write a little #python script that launches #GTKWave and you have yourself a tiny homemade cross platform logic analyzer thing!
    github.com/JulianKemmerer/Pipe

  9. So what can you do with the ability to read arbitrary #FPGA registers out of your design over #UART? Capture time series data (last four #ethernet packet bytes) in your regs and write a little #python script that launches #GTKWave and you have yourself a tiny homemade cross platform logic analyzer thing!
    github.com/JulianKemmerer/Pipe

  10. Адаптация платы Colorlight 5A-75B для примеров «Школы синтеза цифровых схем»

    Привет! Начался новый поток «Школы синтеза цифровых схем» и я хотел бы поделиться своим опытом по адаптации бюджетной платы с ПЛИС для запуска на ней лабораторных работ Школы. Отдельным преимуществом такого решения является возможность использования Open Source маршрута для синтеза и моделирования цифровых схем на базе Yosys и Icarus Verilog. Colorlight 5A-75B не является отладочной платой в привычном понимании этого понятия - будет интересно.

    habr.com/ru/articles/849592/

    #плис #fpga #yosys #lattice #verilog #systemverilog #icarus #gtkwave

  11. Адаптация платы Colorlight 5A-75B для примеров «Школы синтеза цифровых схем»

    Привет! Начался новый поток «Школы синтеза цифровых схем» и я хотел бы поделиться своим опытом по адаптации бюджетной платы с ПЛИС для запуска на ней лабораторных работ Школы. Отдельным преимуществом такого решения является возможность использования Open Source маршрута для синтеза и моделирования цифровых схем на базе Yosys и Icarus Verilog. Colorlight 5A-75B не является отладочной платой в привычном понимании этого понятия - будет интересно.

    habr.com/ru/articles/849592/

    #плис #fpga #yosys #lattice #verilog #systemverilog #icarus #gtkwave

  12. Адаптация платы Colorlight 5A-75B для примеров «Школы синтеза цифровых схем»

    Привет! Начался новый поток «Школы синтеза цифровых схем» и я хотел бы поделиться своим опытом по адаптации бюджетной платы с ПЛИС для запуска на ней лабораторных работ Школы. Отдельным преимуществом такого решения является возможность использования Open Source маршрута для синтеза и моделирования цифровых схем на базе Yosys и Icarus Verilog. Colorlight 5A-75B не является отладочной платой в привычном понимании этого понятия - будет интересно.

    habr.com/ru/articles/849592/

    #плис #fpga #yosys #lattice #verilog #systemverilog #icarus #gtkwave

  13. @thezoq2 I just tried #surfer for the first time today. Compiled from scratch per the website. I had to file a bug, as it crashes after adding a handful of signals.

    I was so hopeful. But for now going back to #gtkwave I'm sad though, because surfer is able to do very simple things like select all the signals at a level and add them to the viewer, whereas gtkwave seems to fight you at every step of the way.

    Maybe I need to roll back to a tagged version and rebuild or something. #ghdl #vhdl

  14. @thezoq2 I just tried #surfer for the first time today. Compiled from scratch per the website. I had to file a bug, as it crashes after adding a handful of signals.

    I was so hopeful. But for now going back to #gtkwave I'm sad though, because surfer is able to do very simple things like select all the signals at a level and add them to the viewer, whereas gtkwave seems to fight you at every step of the way.

    Maybe I need to roll back to a tagged version and rebuild or something. #ghdl #vhdl

  15. @thezoq2 I just tried #surfer for the first time today. Compiled from scratch per the website. I had to file a bug, as it crashes after adding a handful of signals.

    I was so hopeful. But for now going back to #gtkwave I'm sad though, because surfer is able to do very simple things like select all the signals at a level and add them to the viewer, whereas gtkwave seems to fight you at every step of the way.

    Maybe I need to roll back to a tagged version and rebuild or something. #ghdl #vhdl

  16. @thezoq2 I just tried #surfer for the first time today. Compiled from scratch per the website. I had to file a bug, as it crashes after adding a handful of signals.

    I was so hopeful. But for now going back to #gtkwave I'm sad though, because surfer is able to do very simple things like select all the signals at a level and add them to the viewer, whereas gtkwave seems to fight you at every step of the way.

    Maybe I need to roll back to a tagged version and rebuild or something. #ghdl #vhdl

  17. @thezoq2 I just tried #surfer for the first time today. Compiled from scratch per the website. I had to file a bug, as it crashes after adding a handful of signals.

    I was so hopeful. But for now going back to #gtkwave I'm sad though, because surfer is able to do very simple things like select all the signals at a level and add them to the viewer, whereas gtkwave seems to fight you at every step of the way.

    Maybe I need to roll back to a tagged version and rebuild or something. #ghdl #vhdl

  18. Ok so it's still a bit buggy on windows, and ModelSim doesn't play nice.

    But combined with #GHDL for open source #VHDL simulation and #gtkwave for wave viewing it's a surprisingly comfortable to set up tool chain, especially on Linux it's all just via package manager and pip~

    Now to learn proper file structuring and documenting habits to raise the code quality bar a bit, probably add proper test benches~
    Again #TerosHDL helps with built in docs generator <3

  19. Ok so it's still a bit buggy on windows, and ModelSim doesn't play nice.

    But combined with for open source simulation and for wave viewing it's a surprisingly comfortable to set up tool chain, especially on Linux it's all just via package manager and pip~

    Now to learn proper file structuring and documenting habits to raise the code quality bar a bit, probably add proper test benches~
    Again helps with built in docs generator <3

  20. Ok so it's still a bit buggy on windows, and ModelSim doesn't play nice.

    But combined with #GHDL for open source #VHDL simulation and #gtkwave for wave viewing it's a surprisingly comfortable to set up tool chain, especially on Linux it's all just via package manager and pip~

    Now to learn proper file structuring and documenting habits to raise the code quality bar a bit, probably add proper test benches~
    Again #TerosHDL helps with built in docs generator <3

  21. Ok so it's still a bit buggy on windows, and ModelSim doesn't play nice.

    But combined with #GHDL for open source #VHDL simulation and #gtkwave for wave viewing it's a surprisingly comfortable to set up tool chain, especially on Linux it's all just via package manager and pip~

    Now to learn proper file structuring and documenting habits to raise the code quality bar a bit, probably add proper test benches~
    Again #TerosHDL helps with built in docs generator <3

  22. In case this this has baffled anyone else for years, under the Edit menu there's a Toggle Hier button and Set Max Heir button that do the trick on 3.3.104 #gtkwave #fpga #vcd #fst

  23. In case this this has baffled anyone else for years, under the Edit menu there's a Toggle Hier button and Set Max Heir button that do the trick on 3.3.104 #gtkwave #fpga #vcd #fst

  24. In case this this has baffled anyone else for years, under the Edit menu there's a Toggle Hier button and Set Max Heir button that do the trick on 3.3.104 #gtkwave #fpga #vcd #fst

  25. In case this this has baffled anyone else for years, under the Edit menu there's a Toggle Hier button and Set Max Heir button that do the trick on 3.3.104 #gtkwave #fpga #vcd #fst

  26. Is there a way in gtkwave to have it display more of a signals hierarchy? In Modelsim you can have it show anywhere from none to the entirety, but I can't figure out how to do that in gtkwave. #fpga #gtkwave #vcd #fst

  27. Is there a way in gtkwave to have it display more of a signals hierarchy? In Modelsim you can have it show anywhere from none to the entirety, but I can't figure out how to do that in gtkwave. #fpga #gtkwave #vcd #fst

  28. Is there a way in gtkwave to have it display more of a signals hierarchy? In Modelsim you can have it show anywhere from none to the entirety, but I can't figure out how to do that in gtkwave. #fpga #gtkwave #vcd #fst

  29. Is there a way in gtkwave to have it display more of a signals hierarchy? In Modelsim you can have it show anywhere from none to the entirety, but I can't figure out how to do that in gtkwave. #fpga #gtkwave #vcd #fst

  30. Why, #gtkwave, why? What don't you like? You see the values from the sim #fpga and you correctly know that they aren't 0. And you seem to know it's a string of bits. What does that leave? Why are you angry/confused by 1s and only in this variable?

  31. Why, #gtkwave, why? What don't you like? You see the values from the sim #fpga and you correctly know that they aren't 0. And you seem to know it's a string of bits. What does that leave? Why are you angry/confused by 1s and only in this variable?

  32. Why, , why? What don't you like? You see the values from the sim and you correctly know that they aren't 0. And you seem to know it's a string of bits. What does that leave? Why are you angry/confused by 1s and only in this variable?

  33. Why, #gtkwave, why? What don't you like? You see the values from the sim #fpga and you correctly know that they aren't 0. And you seem to know it's a string of bits. What does that leave? Why are you angry/confused by 1s and only in this variable?

  34. Why, #gtkwave, why? What don't you like? You see the values from the sim #fpga and you correctly know that they aren't 0. And you seem to know it's a string of bits. What does that leave? Why are you angry/confused by 1s and only in this variable?