home.social

#acitivtypub — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #acitivtypub, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. So I kinda launched my personal website yesterday and federated it with the activity pub wordpress plugin of @pfefferle

    It works: @plunch but I dont understand it yet.

    In wordpress I can approve replies and likes, but looking at the mastodon profile I cant see any replies.

    Anyone knows why that is?
    Here there are 2 comments that I can only see when being logged out of mastodon: indieweb.social/@plunch@plunch

    #indieweb #acitivtypub

  2. @weitergen nein; die Posts werden über das #AcitivtyPub Protokoll geteilt. D.h. du kannst von deinem Mastodon-Account Pixelfed-User:innen folgen und umgekehrt.

    Soweit ich weiß, zeigen #Pixelfed Feeds (in der App dort) nur Beiträge mit Bildern an – bin mir aber nicht ganz sicher.

    Der @jvanvinkenroye hat auch ein @[email protected] Konto, der kann da sicher kompetenter berichten ;-)

  3. This is my first #Mastodon-powered fediverse server. _^

    That means, aleph.land is one of the first and oldest Mastodon-based #Fediverse instance. _~

    I occasionally log in here to keep it alive because this is historical and memorable for me. During this time, and before Mastodon was released, I was running my own Fediverse instance powered by #Hubzilla.

    Back then, the protocol of the fediverse was #OpenMicroBlogging then #OStatus; #AcitivtyPub came years later.

    Today, we have another federated protocol: #ATproto which is powering The #ATmosphere network (#Bluesky is just one instance).

    (PS. Max chars in Aleph.Land is 1024; and using the #GlitchSoc fork since it came out.)

    You can check out my first ever post using Mastodon here: aleph.land/@yahananxie/28062

    @youronlyone

    #MyFediverseJourney #SocialWeb #OpenSocialWeb #FederatedWeb #FederatedSocialWeb

  4. If you are new to the #Fediverse and you have seen people talk that #Mastodon have 10 million accounts/users…

    At least according to #FediDB this is a false assumption.

    The 10 million accounts/users is for the **entire** **Fediverse network**.

    See: fedidb.org

    Do not confuse the Fediverse with Mastodon, these are **not** interchangeable.

    “Fediverse” is the name of the resulting network that grew out of the #AcitivtyPub (latest) / #OStatus (previous) / #OpenMicroBlogging (first) protocols.

    While “Mastodon” is a software brand name / trademark.

    It's the same with #Lemmy and #Kbin.

    The label #Treadiverse is not interchangeable with the label Fediverse.

    “Threadiverse” refers to the link-aggregator type of software like Lemmy and Kbin (there are others, check the Wikipedia list).

    Threadiverse is part of the Fediverse network.

    Coolness? Awesome!

  5. I still hear a lot about how the term #Fediverse is not catchy, and have the first impression of “The Feds”. Maybe it's time to use a new label?

    (please boost/reshare, thank you!)

    * Note. This is not an official poll or anything. This is only meant to see what the larger community feels and thinks about it.

    (Poll will end after 7 days. You can select multiple answers.)

    A little context:

    * Federated #SNS first came online in 2008, with the platform known as identica (today known as #GNUsocial)
    * The Fediverse was called as #identiverse back then.
    * Other federated SNS platforms publicly launched in 2010, like Friendika (originally MistPark, and now as #Friendica); and #diaspora, to mention two.
    * Someone suggested using a new term instead of “identiverse”.
    * “Fediverse” was floated sometime 2010–2012, and the rest is #history. (aside: If I remember correctly, diaspora came up with “The Fediverse” first, or it was inspired by “Fediverse”?)

    That was us when the federated SNS was mainly techies. Ten years later, I think it is safe to say that the landscape has changed considerably.

    Perhaps, let's see what the larger federated SNS feels and thinks about it, we need to find a more non-techie label for the federated SNS network (using the #AcitivtyPub protocol).

    The one and only rule is this, stay away from BRAND-based labels.

    The current suggestions below came from this thread: https://mastodon.social/@youronlyone/109260510719668078

    To be specific:
    * https://techforgood.social/@dimi/109265108528781658
    * https://techforgood.social/@dimi/109271444830373380
    * https://social.tchncs.de/@gowin/109271635913668308
    * https://techforgood.social/@dimi/109271657677305250

    Feel free to propose other cool names!

    * Note. This is not an official poll or anything. This is only meant to see what the larger community feels and thinks about it.
  6. @trwnh I think there's a bit of difference here. I can see a generic #ActivityStreams library working for both the client and server and then a Web-specific server in #AcitivtyPub and a client for the desktop.