#john-gruber — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #john-gruber, aggregated by home.social.
-
O que é markdown? Conheça a linguagem de marcação para formatar textos
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://tecnoblog.net/responde/o-que-e-markdown/
-
https://www.europesays.com/people/37604/ John Ternus is replacing Tim Cook as Apple CEO. But he faces a big challenge in AI #apple #HardwareEngineering #JohnGruber #JohnTernus #TimCook
-
🤯 Oh no, the horrors of the internet! 🕸️ John Gruber bravely exposes the earth-shattering revelation that websites are bloated. 💥 But wait, there's more! Apparently, #adblockers are a thing? Who knew! 🙄
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/your_frustration_is_the_product #internethorrors #websitebloat #johngruber #technews #socialmedia #HackerNews #ngated -
🤯 Oh no, the horrors of the internet! 🕸️ John Gruber bravely exposes the earth-shattering revelation that websites are bloated. 💥 But wait, there's more! Apparently, #adblockers are a thing? Who knew! 🙄
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/your_frustration_is_the_product #internethorrors #websitebloat #johngruber #technews #socialmedia #HackerNews #ngated -
🤯 Oh no, the horrors of the internet! 🕸️ John Gruber bravely exposes the earth-shattering revelation that websites are bloated. 💥 But wait, there's more! Apparently, #adblockers are a thing? Who knew! 🙄
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/your_frustration_is_the_product #internethorrors #websitebloat #johngruber #technews #socialmedia #HackerNews #ngated -
🤯 Oh no, the horrors of the internet! 🕸️ John Gruber bravely exposes the earth-shattering revelation that websites are bloated. 💥 But wait, there's more! Apparently, #adblockers are a thing? Who knew! 🙄
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/your_frustration_is_the_product #internethorrors #websitebloat #johngruber #technews #socialmedia #HackerNews #ngated -
🤯 Oh no, the horrors of the internet! 🕸️ John Gruber bravely exposes the earth-shattering revelation that websites are bloated. 💥 But wait, there's more! Apparently, #adblockers are a thing? Who knew! 🙄
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/your_frustration_is_the_product #internethorrors #websitebloat #johngruber #technews #socialmedia #HackerNews #ngated -
John Gruber just discovered that silicon gets faster over time 😲. He’s now speculating wildly about a device that doesn't exist yet, because speculating about real devices is so 2025 🕰️. Meanwhile, Apple’s A9 chip from a million years ago is apparently still the benchmark for everything. 🍎⌛
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/the_macbook_neo #JohnGruber #siliconFaster #speculations #AppleA9 #chipBenchmark #HackerNews #ngated -
John Gruber just discovered that silicon gets faster over time 😲. He’s now speculating wildly about a device that doesn't exist yet, because speculating about real devices is so 2025 🕰️. Meanwhile, Apple’s A9 chip from a million years ago is apparently still the benchmark for everything. 🍎⌛
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/the_macbook_neo #JohnGruber #siliconFaster #speculations #AppleA9 #chipBenchmark #HackerNews #ngated -
John Gruber just discovered that silicon gets faster over time 😲. He’s now speculating wildly about a device that doesn't exist yet, because speculating about real devices is so 2025 🕰️. Meanwhile, Apple’s A9 chip from a million years ago is apparently still the benchmark for everything. 🍎⌛
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/the_macbook_neo #JohnGruber #siliconFaster #speculations #AppleA9 #chipBenchmark #HackerNews #ngated -
John Gruber just discovered that silicon gets faster over time 😲. He’s now speculating wildly about a device that doesn't exist yet, because speculating about real devices is so 2025 🕰️. Meanwhile, Apple’s A9 chip from a million years ago is apparently still the benchmark for everything. 🍎⌛
https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/the_macbook_neo #JohnGruber #siliconFaster #speculations #AppleA9 #chipBenchmark #HackerNews #ngated -
Sunday Paper: Markdown’s Quiet Power, Systems, AWS’s Reality Check, Apple’s Creator Studio
Sunday Paper is where I jot down links and ideas that caught my attention this week, with a few personal reactions along the way.https://islandinthenet.com/sunday-paper-markdown-systems-power-and-platforms/
-
Sunday Paper: Markdown’s Quiet Power, Systems, AWS’s Reality Check, Apple’s Creator Studio
Sunday Paper is where I jot down links and ideas that caught my attention this week, with a few personal reactions along the way.https://islandinthenet.com/sunday-paper-markdown-systems-power-and-platforms/
-
#Markdown, a simple plain text formatting language created by #JohnGruber in 2004, revolutionised #webpublishing. Its intuitive syntax, allowing users to format text using standard keyboard characters, quickly gained popularity among bloggers. Beyond blogs, Markdown’s versatility led to its widespread adoption across various platforms, from Google Docs to Slack. https://www.anildash.com/2026/01/09/how-markdown-took-over-the-world/?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#Markdown, a simple plain text formatting language created by #JohnGruber in 2004, revolutionised #webpublishing. Its intuitive syntax, allowing users to format text using standard keyboard characters, quickly gained popularity among bloggers. Beyond blogs, Markdown’s versatility led to its widespread adoption across various platforms, from Google Docs to Slack. https://www.anildash.com/2026/01/09/how-markdown-took-over-the-world/?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#Markdown, a simple plain text formatting language created by #JohnGruber in 2004, revolutionised #webpublishing. Its intuitive syntax, allowing users to format text using standard keyboard characters, quickly gained popularity among bloggers. Beyond blogs, Markdown’s versatility led to its widespread adoption across various platforms, from Google Docs to Slack. https://www.anildash.com/2026/01/09/how-markdown-took-over-the-world/?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#Markdown, a simple plain text formatting language created by #JohnGruber in 2004, revolutionised #webpublishing. Its intuitive syntax, allowing users to format text using standard keyboard characters, quickly gained popularity among bloggers. Beyond blogs, Markdown’s versatility led to its widespread adoption across various platforms, from Google Docs to Slack. https://www.anildash.com/2026/01/09/how-markdown-took-over-the-world/?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
#Markdown, a simple plain text formatting language created by #JohnGruber in 2004, revolutionised #webpublishing. Its intuitive syntax, allowing users to format text using standard keyboard characters, quickly gained popularity among bloggers. Beyond blogs, Markdown’s versatility led to its widespread adoption across various platforms, from Google Docs to Slack. https://www.anildash.com/2026/01/09/how-markdown-took-over-the-world/?eicker.news #tech #media #news
-
Anil Dash: How Markdown took over the world. “Though it’s now a building block of the contemporary Internet, like so many great things, Markdown just started out trying to solve a personal problem. In 2002, John Gruber made the unconventional decision to bet his online career on two completely irrational foundations: Apple, and blogs.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/12/anil-dash-how-markdown-took-over-the-world/ -
Anil Dash: How Markdown took over the world. “Though it’s now a building block of the contemporary Internet, like so many great things, Markdown just started out trying to solve a personal problem. In 2002, John Gruber made the unconventional decision to bet his online career on two completely irrational foundations: Apple, and blogs.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/12/anil-dash-how-markdown-took-over-the-world/ -
Anil Dash: How Markdown took over the world. “Though it’s now a building block of the contemporary Internet, like so many great things, Markdown just started out trying to solve a personal problem. In 2002, John Gruber made the unconventional decision to bet his online career on two completely irrational foundations: Apple, and blogs.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/12/anil-dash-how-markdown-took-over-the-world/ -
Anil Dash: How Markdown took over the world. “Though it’s now a building block of the contemporary Internet, like so many great things, Markdown just started out trying to solve a personal problem. In 2002, John Gruber made the unconventional decision to bet his online career on two completely irrational foundations: Apple, and blogs.”
https://rbfirehose.com/2026/01/12/anil-dash-how-markdown-took-over-the-world/ -
Quand Tim Cook poste une image pour Noël, tout le monde perd ses nerfs...
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://korben.info/tim-cook-pluribus-image-ia-noel.html
-
Quand Tim Cook poste une image pour Noël, tout le monde perd ses nerfs...
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://korben.info/tim-cook-pluribus-image-ia-noel.html
-
Quand Tim Cook poste une image pour Noël, tout le monde perd ses nerfs...
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://korben.info/tim-cook-pluribus-image-ia-noel.html
-
Quand Tim Cook poste une image pour Noël, tout le monde perd ses nerfs...
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://korben.info/tim-cook-pluribus-image-ia-noel.html
-
Quand Tim Cook poste une image pour Noël, tout le monde perd ses nerfs...
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://korben.info/tim-cook-pluribus-image-ia-noel.html
-
Przeciek o odejściu Tima Cooka to celowy „balon próbny”. Apple sprawdza reakcję rynku
Weekendowe doniesienia „Financial Times” o tym, że Tim Cook może ustąpić „już w przyszłym roku”, zelektryzowały świat technologii.
Teraz czołowi analitycy poczynań Apple, w tym John Gruber i Ben Lovejoy z 9to5Mac, są zgodni (również i my w naszej redakcji jesteśmy tego zdania): to nie był przypadkowy przeciek. To był celowy „balon próbny”, wypuszczony przez zarząd Apple, by przetestować reakcję inwestorów.
Po tym, jak w niedzielę poinformowaliśmy o raporcie FT, teraz mamy analizę „drugiego dna” tej historii – czyli dlaczego ten news w ogóle się ukazał.
„To oczywisty, celowy przeciek”
Jak zauważa Ben Lovejoy z 9to5Mac, ten news ma wszystkie znamiona kontrolowanego przecieku. John Gruber, jeden z najbardziej szanowanych komentatorów Apple, podkreśla, że liczba osób w firmie, które miałyby dostęp do tak wrażliwych informacji (plany sukcesji CEO), jest mikroskopijna – ogranicza się do zarządu i garstki topowych menedżerów. Przypadkowy wyciek z tak hermetycznego kręgu jest bardzo mało prawdopodobny… chyba, że jest „przeciekiem kontrolowanym”.
Gruber spekuluje, że źródła z zarządu Apple rozmawiały z Financial Times za wiedzą i błogosławieństwem samego Cooka, aby oswoić rynek z tą informacją.
Czterech autorów i „balon próbny”
Inny analityk, MG Siegler, wskazuje na coś jeszcze: oryginalny, krótki artykuł w Financial Times miał aż czterech autorów. To sugeruje, że nie była to „luźna pogawędka”, ale poważna, skoordynowana akcja oparta na wielu źródłach, mająca na celu wypuszczenie „balonu próbnego”.
„Balon próbny” to strategia polegająca na celowym przecieku informacji do mediów, aby sprawdzić reakcję (w tym przypadku rynku) przed podjęciem ostatecznej, oficjalnej decyzji.
Jaki był cel? Sprawdzić reakcję giełdy
Tim Cook przejął Apple o wartości 350 miliardów dolarów i zamienił je w potęgę wartą 4 biliony dolarów. Zarząd ma prawo obawiać się, że ogłoszenie jego odejścia wywoła panikę na giełdzie i spadek cen akcji.
Ten przeciek miał dać odpowiedź, czy rynek jest gotowy.
Wynik testu: rynek jest gotowy
Jak na razie, test wydaje się udany. Jak możemy zauważyć, notowania akcji Apple (AAPL) w handlu przedsesyjnym spadły o mniej niż 1%, co mieści się w granicach normalnych wahań.
To sugeruje, że inwestorzy są pogodzeni z odejściem Cooka i nie boją się przyszłości pod (prawdopodobnym) kierownictwem Johna Ternusa. Skoro test się powiódł, oficjalne ogłoszenie w pierwszej połowie 2026 roku staje się teraz jeszcze bardziej prawdopodobne.
Tim Cook może ustąpić ze stanowiska CEO Apple Inc. już w 2026 roku
#apple #balonProbny #dymisja #financialTimes #johnGruber #johnTernus #news #przeciek #timCook
-
Przeciek o odejściu Tima Cooka to celowy „balon próbny”. Apple sprawdza reakcję rynku
Weekendowe doniesienia „Financial Times” o tym, że Tim Cook może ustąpić „już w przyszłym roku”, zelektryzowały świat technologii.
Teraz czołowi analitycy poczynań Apple, w tym John Gruber i Ben Lovejoy z 9to5Mac, są zgodni (również i my w naszej redakcji jesteśmy tego zdania): to nie był przypadkowy przeciek. To był celowy „balon próbny”, wypuszczony przez zarząd Apple, by przetestować reakcję inwestorów.
Po tym, jak w niedzielę poinformowaliśmy o raporcie FT, teraz mamy analizę „drugiego dna” tej historii – czyli dlaczego ten news w ogóle się ukazał.
„To oczywisty, celowy przeciek”
Jak zauważa Ben Lovejoy z 9to5Mac, ten news ma wszystkie znamiona kontrolowanego przecieku. John Gruber, jeden z najbardziej szanowanych komentatorów Apple, podkreśla, że liczba osób w firmie, które miałyby dostęp do tak wrażliwych informacji (plany sukcesji CEO), jest mikroskopijna – ogranicza się do zarządu i garstki topowych menedżerów. Przypadkowy wyciek z tak hermetycznego kręgu jest bardzo mało prawdopodobny… chyba, że jest „przeciekiem kontrolowanym”.
Gruber spekuluje, że źródła z zarządu Apple rozmawiały z Financial Times za wiedzą i błogosławieństwem samego Cooka, aby oswoić rynek z tą informacją.
Czterech autorów i „balon próbny”
Inny analityk, MG Siegler, wskazuje na coś jeszcze: oryginalny, krótki artykuł w Financial Times miał aż czterech autorów. To sugeruje, że nie była to „luźna pogawędka”, ale poważna, skoordynowana akcja oparta na wielu źródłach, mająca na celu wypuszczenie „balonu próbnego”.
„Balon próbny” to strategia polegająca na celowym przecieku informacji do mediów, aby sprawdzić reakcję (w tym przypadku rynku) przed podjęciem ostatecznej, oficjalnej decyzji.
Jaki był cel? Sprawdzić reakcję giełdy
Tim Cook przejął Apple o wartości 350 miliardów dolarów i zamienił je w potęgę wartą 4 biliony dolarów. Zarząd ma prawo obawiać się, że ogłoszenie jego odejścia wywoła panikę na giełdzie i spadek cen akcji.
Ten przeciek miał dać odpowiedź, czy rynek jest gotowy.
Wynik testu: rynek jest gotowy
Jak na razie, test wydaje się udany. Jak możemy zauważyć, notowania akcji Apple (AAPL) w handlu przedsesyjnym spadły o mniej niż 1%, co mieści się w granicach normalnych wahań.
To sugeruje, że inwestorzy są pogodzeni z odejściem Cooka i nie boją się przyszłości pod (prawdopodobnym) kierownictwem Johna Ternusa. Skoro test się powiódł, oficjalne ogłoszenie w pierwszej połowie 2026 roku staje się teraz jeszcze bardziej prawdopodobne.
Tim Cook może ustąpić ze stanowiska CEO Apple Inc. już w 2026 roku
#apple #balonProbny #dymisja #financialTimes #johnGruber #johnTernus #news #przeciek #timCook
-
Przeciek o odejściu Tima Cooka to celowy „balon próbny”. Apple sprawdza reakcję rynku
Weekendowe doniesienia „Financial Times” o tym, że Tim Cook może ustąpić „już w przyszłym roku”, zelektryzowały świat technologii.
Teraz czołowi analitycy poczynań Apple, w tym John Gruber i Ben Lovejoy z 9to5Mac, są zgodni (również i my w naszej redakcji jesteśmy tego zdania): to nie był przypadkowy przeciek. To był celowy „balon próbny”, wypuszczony przez zarząd Apple, by przetestować reakcję inwestorów.
Po tym, jak w niedzielę poinformowaliśmy o raporcie FT, teraz mamy analizę „drugiego dna” tej historii – czyli dlaczego ten news w ogóle się ukazał.
„To oczywisty, celowy przeciek”
Jak zauważa Ben Lovejoy z 9to5Mac, ten news ma wszystkie znamiona kontrolowanego przecieku. John Gruber, jeden z najbardziej szanowanych komentatorów Apple, podkreśla, że liczba osób w firmie, które miałyby dostęp do tak wrażliwych informacji (plany sukcesji CEO), jest mikroskopijna – ogranicza się do zarządu i garstki topowych menedżerów. Przypadkowy wyciek z tak hermetycznego kręgu jest bardzo mało prawdopodobny… chyba, że jest „przeciekiem kontrolowanym”.
Gruber spekuluje, że źródła z zarządu Apple rozmawiały z Financial Times za wiedzą i błogosławieństwem samego Cooka, aby oswoić rynek z tą informacją.
Czterech autorów i „balon próbny”
Inny analityk, MG Siegler, wskazuje na coś jeszcze: oryginalny, krótki artykuł w Financial Times miał aż czterech autorów. To sugeruje, że nie była to „luźna pogawędka”, ale poważna, skoordynowana akcja oparta na wielu źródłach, mająca na celu wypuszczenie „balonu próbnego”.
„Balon próbny” to strategia polegająca na celowym przecieku informacji do mediów, aby sprawdzić reakcję (w tym przypadku rynku) przed podjęciem ostatecznej, oficjalnej decyzji.
Jaki był cel? Sprawdzić reakcję giełdy
Tim Cook przejął Apple o wartości 350 miliardów dolarów i zamienił je w potęgę wartą 4 biliony dolarów. Zarząd ma prawo obawiać się, że ogłoszenie jego odejścia wywoła panikę na giełdzie i spadek cen akcji.
Ten przeciek miał dać odpowiedź, czy rynek jest gotowy.
Wynik testu: rynek jest gotowy
Jak na razie, test wydaje się udany. Jak możemy zauważyć, notowania akcji Apple (AAPL) w handlu przedsesyjnym spadły o mniej niż 1%, co mieści się w granicach normalnych wahań.
To sugeruje, że inwestorzy są pogodzeni z odejściem Cooka i nie boją się przyszłości pod (prawdopodobnym) kierownictwem Johna Ternusa. Skoro test się powiódł, oficjalne ogłoszenie w pierwszej połowie 2026 roku staje się teraz jeszcze bardziej prawdopodobne.
Tim Cook może ustąpić ze stanowiska CEO Apple Inc. już w 2026 roku
#apple #balonProbny #dymisja #financialTimes #johnGruber #johnTernus #news #przeciek #timCook
-
Przeciek o odejściu Tima Cooka to celowy „balon próbny”. Apple sprawdza reakcję rynku
Weekendowe doniesienia „Financial Times” o tym, że Tim Cook może ustąpić „już w przyszłym roku”, zelektryzowały świat technologii.
Teraz czołowi analitycy poczynań Apple, w tym John Gruber i Ben Lovejoy z 9to5Mac, są zgodni (również i my w naszej redakcji jesteśmy tego zdania): to nie był przypadkowy przeciek. To był celowy „balon próbny”, wypuszczony przez zarząd Apple, by przetestować reakcję inwestorów.
Po tym, jak w niedzielę poinformowaliśmy o raporcie FT, teraz mamy analizę „drugiego dna” tej historii – czyli dlaczego ten news w ogóle się ukazał.
„To oczywisty, celowy przeciek”
Jak zauważa Ben Lovejoy z 9to5Mac, ten news ma wszystkie znamiona kontrolowanego przecieku. John Gruber, jeden z najbardziej szanowanych komentatorów Apple, podkreśla, że liczba osób w firmie, które miałyby dostęp do tak wrażliwych informacji (plany sukcesji CEO), jest mikroskopijna – ogranicza się do zarządu i garstki topowych menedżerów. Przypadkowy wyciek z tak hermetycznego kręgu jest bardzo mało prawdopodobny… chyba, że jest „przeciekiem kontrolowanym”.
Gruber spekuluje, że źródła z zarządu Apple rozmawiały z Financial Times za wiedzą i błogosławieństwem samego Cooka, aby oswoić rynek z tą informacją.
Czterech autorów i „balon próbny”
Inny analityk, MG Siegler, wskazuje na coś jeszcze: oryginalny, krótki artykuł w Financial Times miał aż czterech autorów. To sugeruje, że nie była to „luźna pogawędka”, ale poważna, skoordynowana akcja oparta na wielu źródłach, mająca na celu wypuszczenie „balonu próbnego”.
„Balon próbny” to strategia polegająca na celowym przecieku informacji do mediów, aby sprawdzić reakcję (w tym przypadku rynku) przed podjęciem ostatecznej, oficjalnej decyzji.
Jaki był cel? Sprawdzić reakcję giełdy
Tim Cook przejął Apple o wartości 350 miliardów dolarów i zamienił je w potęgę wartą 4 biliony dolarów. Zarząd ma prawo obawiać się, że ogłoszenie jego odejścia wywoła panikę na giełdzie i spadek cen akcji.
Ten przeciek miał dać odpowiedź, czy rynek jest gotowy.
Wynik testu: rynek jest gotowy
Jak na razie, test wydaje się udany. Jak możemy zauważyć, notowania akcji Apple (AAPL) w handlu przedsesyjnym spadły o mniej niż 1%, co mieści się w granicach normalnych wahań.
To sugeruje, że inwestorzy są pogodzeni z odejściem Cooka i nie boją się przyszłości pod (prawdopodobnym) kierownictwem Johna Ternusa. Skoro test się powiódł, oficjalne ogłoszenie w pierwszej połowie 2026 roku staje się teraz jeszcze bardziej prawdopodobne.
Tim Cook może ustąpić ze stanowiska CEO Apple Inc. już w 2026 roku
#apple #balonProbny #dymisja #financialTimes #johnGruber #johnTernus #news #przeciek #timCook
-
Subservient
Only with Substack does anyone perceive creator branding as being subservient to the platform — something that ought to be seen merely as an interchangeable CMS — like that.
~ John Gruber from, Daring Fireball: The Substack Branding and Faux Prestige Trapslip:4udate3.
I’ve tried a few different things on Substack. (None of them ever took off, and each of them I subsequently moved to web sites I directly control.) I’ve always felt something was off, and lately I’ve been souring more on the whole platform. This piece by Gruber puts a clear, fine point on what I dislike about Substack.
ɕ
#Blogging #JohnGruber #Substack -
John Gruber äußert sich zu Apples Absage an Interview nach Kritik
John Gruber, ein bekannter Apple-Experte, hat in der Technikwelt für Aufsehen gesorgt. Grund ist die Absage eines langjährig geplanten Interviews durch Apple. Diese Entsche
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/john-gruber-aeussert-sich-zu-apples-absage-an-interview-nach-kritik/
#News #Tellerrand #Apple #Interviewabsage #JohnGruber #Kritik #Medienbeziehungen #Podcaster #Technologiefirmen #TheTalkShow #Unabhngigkeit #WWDC -
John Gruber äußert sich zu Apples Absage an Interview nach Kritik
John Gruber, ein bekannter Apple-Experte, hat in der Technikwelt für Aufsehen gesorgt. Grund ist die Absage eines langjährig geplanten Interviews durch Apple. Diese Entsche
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/john-gruber-aeussert-sich-zu-apples-absage-an-interview-nach-kritik/
#News #Tellerrand #Apple #Interviewabsage #JohnGruber #Kritik #Medienbeziehungen #Podcaster #Technologiefirmen #TheTalkShow #Unabhngigkeit #WWDC -
John Gruber äußert sich zu Apples Absage an Interview nach Kritik
John Gruber, ein bekannter Apple-Experte, hat in der Technikwelt für Aufsehen gesorgt. Grund ist die Absage eines langjährig geplanten Interviews durch Apple. Diese Entsche
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/john-gruber-aeussert-sich-zu-apples-absage-an-interview-nach-kritik/
#News #Tellerrand #Apple #Interviewabsage #JohnGruber #Kritik #Medienbeziehungen #Podcaster #Technologiefirmen #TheTalkShow #Unabhngigkeit #WWDC -
John Gruber äußert sich zu Apples Absage an Interview nach Kritik
John Gruber, ein bekannter Apple-Experte, hat in der Technikwelt für Aufsehen gesorgt. Grund ist die Absage eines langjährig geplanten Interviews durch Apple. Diese Entsche
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/john-gruber-aeussert-sich-zu-apples-absage-an-interview-nach-kritik/
#News #Tellerrand #Apple #Interviewabsage #JohnGruber #Kritik #Medienbeziehungen #Podcaster #Technologiefirmen #TheTalkShow #Unabhngigkeit #WWDC -
John Gruber äußert sich zu Apples Absage an Interview nach Kritik
John Gruber, ein bekannter Apple-Experte, hat in der Technikwelt für Aufsehen gesorgt. Grund ist die Absage eines langjährig geplanten Interviews durch Apple. Diese Entsche
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/john-gruber-aeussert-sich-zu-apples-absage-an-interview-nach-kritik/
#News #Tellerrand #Apple #Interviewabsage #JohnGruber #Kritik #Medienbeziehungen #Podcaster #Technologiefirmen #TheTalkShow #Unabhngigkeit #WWDC -
Pour John Gruber, Apple s’est dévalorisée en boycottant son émission après ses critiques sur Siri http://dlvr.it/TLRTHv #Apple #JohnGruber
-
Pour John Gruber, Apple s’est dévalorisée en boycottant son émission après ses critiques sur Siri http://dlvr.it/TLRTHv #Apple #JohnGruber
-
Pour John Gruber, Apple s’est dévalorisée en boycottant son émission après ses critiques sur Siri http://dlvr.it/TLRTHv #Apple #JohnGruber
-
Pour John Gruber, Apple s’est dévalorisée en boycottant son émission après ses critiques sur Siri http://dlvr.it/TLRTHv #Apple #JohnGruber
-
Pour John Gruber, Apple s’est dévalorisée en boycottant son émission après ses critiques sur Siri http://dlvr.it/TLRTHv #Apple #JohnGruber
-
Streit um Siri als Vaporware: Kontroverse bleibt bestehen
Apple steht nach wie vor im Fokus einer anhaltenden Kontroverse um angebliche Siri-Vaporware. Unbeirrt setzen Kritiker:innen,
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/streit-um-siri-als-vaporware-kontroverse-bleibt-bestehen/
#KI #News #Apple #CraigFederighi #GregJoswiak #iPhone #JohnGruber #Kontroverse #KnstlicheIntelligenz #MGSiegler #Produktentwicklung #RussellIvanovic #Siri #Technologie #Technologiekritik #Vaporware #Werbung #WWDC -
Streit um Siri als Vaporware: Kontroverse bleibt bestehen
Apple steht nach wie vor im Fokus einer anhaltenden Kontroverse um angebliche Siri-Vaporware. Unbeirrt setzen Kritiker:innen,
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/streit-um-siri-als-vaporware-kontroverse-bleibt-bestehen/
#KI #News #Apple #CraigFederighi #GregJoswiak #iPhone #JohnGruber #Kontroverse #KnstlicheIntelligenz #MGSiegler #Produktentwicklung #RussellIvanovic #Siri #Technologie #Technologiekritik #Vaporware #Werbung #WWDC -
Streit um Siri als Vaporware: Kontroverse bleibt bestehen
Apple steht nach wie vor im Fokus einer anhaltenden Kontroverse um angebliche Siri-Vaporware. Unbeirrt setzen Kritiker:innen,
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/streit-um-siri-als-vaporware-kontroverse-bleibt-bestehen/
#KI #News #Apple #CraigFederighi #GregJoswiak #iPhone #JohnGruber #Kontroverse #KnstlicheIntelligenz #MGSiegler #Produktentwicklung #RussellIvanovic #Siri #Technologie #Technologiekritik #Vaporware #Werbung #WWDC -
Streit um Siri als Vaporware: Kontroverse bleibt bestehen
Apple steht nach wie vor im Fokus einer anhaltenden Kontroverse um angebliche Siri-Vaporware. Unbeirrt setzen Kritiker:innen,
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/streit-um-siri-als-vaporware-kontroverse-bleibt-bestehen/
#KI #News #Apple #CraigFederighi #GregJoswiak #iPhone #JohnGruber #Kontroverse #KnstlicheIntelligenz #MGSiegler #Produktentwicklung #RussellIvanovic #Siri #Technologie #Technologiekritik #Vaporware #Werbung #WWDC -
Streit um Siri als Vaporware: Kontroverse bleibt bestehen
Apple steht nach wie vor im Fokus einer anhaltenden Kontroverse um angebliche Siri-Vaporware. Unbeirrt setzen Kritiker:innen,
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/streit-um-siri-als-vaporware-kontroverse-bleibt-bestehen/
#KI #News #Apple #CraigFederighi #GregJoswiak #iPhone #JohnGruber #Kontroverse #KnstlicheIntelligenz #MGSiegler #Produktentwicklung #RussellIvanovic #Siri #Technologie #Technologiekritik #Vaporware #Werbung #WWDC -
It's surprising that the creator of Markdown, John Gruber still thinks "Markdown is a text-to-HTML conversion tool for web writers." today.
What he created has long since grown into much more than that.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/06/04/apple-notes-markdown
-
It's surprising that the creator of Markdown, John Gruber still thinks "Markdown is a text-to-HTML conversion tool for web writers." today.
What he created has long since grown into much more than that.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/06/04/apple-notes-markdown
-
It's surprising that the creator of Markdown, John Gruber still thinks "Markdown is a text-to-HTML conversion tool for web writers." today.
What he created has long since grown into much more than that.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/06/04/apple-notes-markdown
-
It's surprising that the creator of Markdown, John Gruber still thinks "Markdown is a text-to-HTML conversion tool for web writers." today.
What he created has long since grown into much more than that.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/06/04/apple-notes-markdown
-
It's surprising that the creator of Markdown, John Gruber still thinks "Markdown is a text-to-HTML conversion tool for web writers." today.
What he created has long since grown into much more than that.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/06/04/apple-notes-markdown
-
Apple Opts Out of John Gruber’s Talk Show Live at WWDC
This is significant. Apple — under fire from many directions — is opting out of having executives participating in a now decade-long tradition on John Gruber’s The Talk Show Live podcast. Gruber made the announcement on his blog, Daring Fireball.
On the one hand, given the number of fires the folks at Cupertino are fighting at the moment, it’s easy to say you can’t fault the decision. To my way of thinking though, that’s an injured hand you’re afraid to show. If it were my decision — and granted I certainly do not know what the folks at Apple know — I’d use the other hand, with a whip in it.
Here’s why.
There’s nothing that each of the audiences Apple plays to at WWDC aren’t aware of. Who are those audiences? There are the fans, the developers, the media, and Wall Street. Like it or not each of those audiences already have enough awareness of Apple’s problems delivering Apple Intelligence, tariff battles, developer relations, and court and regulatory actions. They each come in with their own set of expectations and agendas.
I would also suggest that those paying attention at WWDC — and who have read Patrick McGee’s new book Apple in China — will be approaching whatever Apple announces this year and going forward in a new context. That book not only alters the Apple narratives; in my opinion, it forces a reset.
Already I’ve seen several in the community respond to the news that Apple is forgoing an opportunity to put on a human face and connect in the midst of all that’s going on. Here’s Marco Arment and Parker Ortolani to link to two.
These Talk Show Live events have indeed been a welcome side show — an opportunity to catch a glimpse of a bit of the humanity behind the corporate front. By and large I think the history of the Gruber’s event has been a net positive. Think of it like seeing the filmmakers on stage after a screening. To a certain degree I also think those days are over with the current leadership.
In this moment of high stakes on so many fronts, Apple has obviously calculated that not putting its executives in the relatively warm seat — no offense to Gruber, but the past questions and follow up have usually not been too tough — is the better bet than attempting to meet things head on.
Again, I’d argue for the head-on approach. If you ignore what your audience is already thinking you essentially ignore (and further offend) them. If ever there was a crowd that might be receptive to some honesty (admittedly PR-coached,) Gruber’s forum would be the place to find it. Does Apple need to issue some mea culpas? Maybe, maybe not. But even well coached honesty in a discussion can go a long way to creating good will. If you ask me, Apple needs more than a little of that presently.
In my professional life I’ve faced some high-stakes presentations. None on this level certainly. I may have been working to save a theatre or two, but my success or failure never had a large piece of the world’s economy depending on it. Still, the minute stakeholders assemble for such an event you only have several choices. Distract. Deny. Or be honest.
WWDC is going to happen. Arms among the audiences will be crossed, waiting for answers and clues. Apple will certainly have enough well-packaged announcements to distract at WWDC. They can’t deny their way out of the problems they brought on themselves. Being honest, however, can’t cause any more damage than has already been done.
I certainly wouldn’t want to be involved in the planning or presenting of this year’s WWDC event — even if it is pre-taped and packaged within an inch of its life. Apple has made its choice for The Talk Show Live. While the big packaged show always takes precedence, this year seems very ripe for a side show that clears the air a bit. As Parker Ortolani says, not having that will speak volumes. It is already a very loud signal about how things might play out going forward.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
#ai #Apple #JohnGruber #Mac #Tech #technology #TheTalkShow #WWDC #WWDC2025
-
Apple Opts Out of John Gruber’s Talk Show Live at WWDC
This is significant. Apple — under fire from many directions — is opting out of having executives participating in a now decade-long tradition on John Gruber’s The Talk Show Live podcast. Gruber made the announcement on his blog, Daring Fireball.
On the one hand, given the number of fires the folks at Cupertino are fighting at the moment, it’s easy to say you can’t fault the decision. To my way of thinking though, that’s an injured hand you’re afraid to show. If it were my decision — and granted I certainly do not know what the folks at Apple know — I’d use the other hand, with a whip in it.
Here’s why.
There’s nothing that each of the audiences Apple plays to at WWDC aren’t aware of. Who are those audiences? There are the fans, the developers, the media, and Wall Street. Like it or not each of those audiences already have enough awareness of Apple’s problems delivering Apple Intelligence, tariff battles, developer relations, and court and regulatory actions. They each come in with their own set of expectations and agendas.
I would also suggest that those paying attention at WWDC — and who have read Patrick McGee’s new book Apple in China — will be approaching whatever Apple announces this year and going forward in a new context. That book not only alters the Apple narratives; in my opinion, it forces a reset.
Already I’ve seen several in the community respond to the news that Apple is forgoing an opportunity to put on a human face and connect in the midst of all that’s going on. Here’s Marco Arment and Parker Ortolani to link to two.
These Talk Show Live events have indeed been a welcome side show — an opportunity to catch a glimpse of a bit of the humanity behind the corporate front. By and large I think the history of the Gruber’s event has been a net positive. Think of it like seeing the filmmakers on stage after a screening. To a certain degree I also think those days are over with the current leadership.
In this moment of high stakes on so many fronts, Apple has obviously calculated that not putting its executives in the relatively warm seat — no offense to Gruber, but the past questions and follow up have usually not been too tough — is the better bet than attempting to meet things head on.
Again, I’d argue for the head-on approach. If you ignore what your audience is already thinking you essentially ignore (and further offend) them. If ever there was a crowd that might be receptive to some honesty (admittedly PR-coached,) Gruber’s forum would be the place to find it. Does Apple need to issue some mea culpas? Maybe, maybe not. But even well coached honesty in a discussion can go a long way to creating good will. If you ask me, Apple needs more than a little of that presently.
In my professional life I’ve faced some high-stakes presentations. None on this level certainly. I may have been working to save a theatre or two, but my success or failure never had a large piece of the world’s economy depending on it. Still, the minute stakeholders assemble for such an event you only have several choices. Distract. Deny. Or be honest.
WWDC is going to happen. Arms among the audiences will be crossed, waiting for answers and clues. Apple will certainly have enough well-packaged announcements to distract at WWDC. They can’t deny their way out of the problems they brought on themselves. Being honest, however, can’t cause any more damage than has already been done.
I certainly wouldn’t want to be involved in the planning or presenting of this year’s WWDC event — even if it is pre-taped and packaged within an inch of its life. Apple has made its choice for The Talk Show Live. While the big packaged show always takes precedence, this year seems very ripe for a side show that clears the air a bit. As Parker Ortolani says, not having that will speak volumes. It is already a very loud signal about how things might play out going forward.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
#ai #Apple #JohnGruber #Mac #Tech #technology #TheTalkShow #WWDC #WWDC2025
-
Apple Opts Out of John Gruber’s Talk Show Live at WWDC
This is significant. Apple — under fire from many directions — is opting out of having executives participating in a now decade-long tradition on John Gruber’s The Talk Show Live podcast. Gruber made the announcement on his blog, Daring Fireball.
On the one hand, given the number of fires the folks at Cupertino are fighting at the moment, it’s easy to say you can’t fault the decision. To my way of thinking though, that’s an injured hand you’re afraid to show. If it were my decision — and granted I certainly do not know what the folks at Apple know — I’d use the other hand, with a whip in it.
Here’s why.
There’s nothing that each of the audiences Apple plays to at WWDC aren’t aware of. Who are those audiences? There are the fans, the developers, the media, and Wall Street. Like it or not each of those audiences already have enough awareness of Apple’s problems delivering Apple Intelligence, tariff battles, developer relations, and court and regulatory actions. They each come in with their own set of expectations and agendas.
I would also suggest that those paying attention at WWDC — and who have read Patrick McGee’s new book Apple in China — will be approaching whatever Apple announces this year and going forward in a new context. That book not only alters the Apple narratives; in my opinion, it forces a reset.
Already I’ve seen several in the community respond to the news that Apple is forgoing an opportunity to put on a human face and connect in the midst of all that’s going on. Here’s Marco Arment and Parker Ortolani to link to two.
These Talk Show Live events have indeed been a welcome side show — an opportunity to catch a glimpse of a bit of the humanity behind the corporate front. By and large I think the history of the Gruber’s event has been a net positive. Think of it like seeing the filmmakers on stage after a screening. To a certain degree I also think those days are over with the current leadership.
In this moment of high stakes on so many fronts, Apple has obviously calculated that not putting its executives in the relatively warm seat — no offense to Gruber, but the past questions and follow up have usually not been too tough — is the better bet than attempting to meet things head on.
Again, I’d argue for the head-on approach. If you ignore what your audience is already thinking you essentially ignore (and further offend) them. If ever there was a crowd that might be receptive to some honesty (admittedly PR-coached,) Gruber’s forum would be the place to find it. Does Apple need to issue some mea culpas? Maybe, maybe not. But even well coached honesty in a discussion can go a long way to creating good will. If you ask me, Apple needs more than a little of that presently.
In my professional life I’ve faced some high-stakes presentations. None on this level certainly. I may have been working to save a theatre or two, but my success or failure never had a large piece of the world’s economy depending on it. Still, the minute stakeholders assemble for such an event you only have several choices. Distract. Deny. Or be honest.
WWDC is going to happen. Arms among the audiences will be crossed, waiting for answers and clues. Apple will certainly have enough well-packaged announcements to distract at WWDC. They can’t deny their way out of the problems they brought on themselves. Being honest, however, can’t cause any more damage than has already been done.
I certainly wouldn’t want to be involved in the planning or presenting of this year’s WWDC event — even if it is pre-taped and packaged within an inch of its life. Apple has made its choice for The Talk Show Live. While the big packaged show always takes precedence, this year seems very ripe for a side show that clears the air a bit. As Parker Ortolani says, not having that will speak volumes. It is already a very loud signal about how things might play out going forward.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
#ai #Apple #JohnGruber #Mac #Tech #technology #TheTalkShow #WWDC #WWDC2025
-
Apple Opts Out of John Gruber’s Talk Show Live at WWDC
This is significant. Apple — under fire from many directions — is opting out of having executives participating in a now decade-long tradition on John Gruber’s The Talk Show Live podcast. Gruber made the announcement on his blog, Daring Fireball.
On the one hand, given the number of fires the folks at Cupertino are fighting at the moment, it’s easy to say you can’t fault the decision. To my way of thinking though, that’s an injured hand you’re afraid to show. If it were my decision — and granted I certainly do not know what the folks at Apple know — I’d use the other hand, with a whip in it.
Here’s why.
There’s nothing that each of the audiences Apple plays to at WWDC aren’t aware of. Who are those audiences? There are the fans, the developers, the media, and Wall Street. Like it or not each of those audiences already have enough awareness of Apple’s problems delivering Apple Intelligence, tariff battles, developer relations, and court and regulatory actions. They each come in with their own set of expectations and agendas.
I would also suggest that those paying attention at WWDC — and who have read Patrick McGee’s new book Apple in China — will be approaching whatever Apple announces this year and going forward in a new context. That book not only alters the Apple narratives; in my opinion, it forces a reset.
Already I’ve seen several in the community respond to the news that Apple is forgoing an opportunity to put on a human face and connect in the midst of all that’s going on. Here’s Marco Arment and Parker Ortolani to link to two.
These Talk Show Live events have indeed been a welcome side show — an opportunity to catch a glimpse of a bit of the humanity behind the corporate front. By and large I think the history of the Gruber’s event has been a net positive. Think of it like seeing the filmmakers on stage after a screening. To a certain degree I also think those days are over with the current leadership.
In this moment of high stakes on so many fronts, Apple has obviously calculated that not putting its executives in the relatively warm seat — no offense to Gruber, but the past questions and follow up have usually not been too tough — is the better bet than attempting to meet things head on.
Again, I’d argue for the head-on approach. If you ignore what your audience is already thinking you essentially ignore (and further offend) them. If ever there was a crowd that might be receptive to some honesty (admittedly PR-coached,) Gruber’s forum would be the place to find it. Does Apple need to issue some mea culpas? Maybe, maybe not. But even well coached honesty in a discussion can go a long way to creating good will. If you ask me, Apple needs more than a little of that presently.
In my professional life I’ve faced some high-stakes presentations. None on this level certainly. I may have been working to save a theatre or two, but my success or failure never had a large piece of the world’s economy depending on it. Still, the minute stakeholders assemble for such an event you only have several choices. Distract. Deny. Or be honest.
WWDC is going to happen. Arms among the audiences will be crossed, waiting for answers and clues. Apple will certainly have enough well-packaged announcements to distract at WWDC. They can’t deny their way out of the problems they brought on themselves. Being honest, however, can’t cause any more damage than has already been done.
I certainly wouldn’t want to be involved in the planning or presenting of this year’s WWDC event — even if it is pre-taped and packaged within an inch of its life. Apple has made its choice for The Talk Show Live. While the big packaged show always takes precedence, this year seems very ripe for a side show that clears the air a bit. As Parker Ortolani says, not having that will speak volumes. It is already a very loud signal about how things might play out going forward.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
#ai #Apple #JohnGruber #Mac #Tech #technology #TheTalkShow #WWDC #WWDC2025
-
Apple Opts Out of John Gruber’s Talk Show Live at WWDC
This is significant. Apple — under fire from many directions — is opting out of having executives participating in a now decade-long tradition on John Gruber’s The Talk Show Live podcast. Gruber made the announcement on his blog, Daring Fireball.
On the one hand, given the number of fires the folks at Cupertino are fighting at the moment, it’s easy to say you can’t fault the decision. To my way of thinking though, that’s an injured hand you’re afraid to show. If it were my decision — and granted I certainly do not know what the folks at Apple know — I’d use the other hand, with a whip in it.
Here’s why.
There’s nothing that each of the audiences Apple plays to at WWDC aren’t aware of. Who are those audiences? There are the fans, the developers, the media, and Wall Street. Like it or not each of those audiences already have enough awareness of Apple’s problems delivering Apple Intelligence, tariff battles, developer relations, and court and regulatory actions. They each come in with their own set of expectations and agendas.
I would also suggest that those paying attention at WWDC — and who have read Patrick McGee’s new book Apple in China — will be approaching whatever Apple announces this year and going forward in a new context. That book not only alters the Apple narratives; in my opinion, it forces a reset.
Already I’ve seen several in the community respond to the news that Apple is forgoing an opportunity to put on a human face and connect in the midst of all that’s going on. Here’s Marco Arment and Parker Ortolani to link to two.
These Talk Show Live events have indeed been a welcome side show — an opportunity to catch a glimpse of a bit of the humanity behind the corporate front. By and large I think the history of the Gruber’s event has been a net positive. Think of it like seeing the filmmakers on stage after a screening. To a certain degree I also think those days are over with the current leadership.
In this moment of high stakes on so many fronts, Apple has obviously calculated that not putting its executives in the relatively warm seat — no offense to Gruber, but the past questions and follow up have usually not been too tough — is the better bet than attempting to meet things head on.
Again, I’d argue for the head-on approach. If you ignore what your audience is already thinking you essentially ignore (and further offend) them. If ever there was a crowd that might be receptive to some honesty (admittedly PR-coached,) Gruber’s forum would be the place to find it. Does Apple need to issue some mea culpas? Maybe, maybe not. But even well coached honesty in a discussion can go a long way to creating good will. If you ask me, Apple needs more than a little of that presently.
In my professional life I’ve faced some high-stakes presentations. None on this level certainly. I may have been working to save a theatre or two, but my success or failure never had a large piece of the world’s economy depending on it. Still, the minute stakeholders assemble for such an event you only have several choices. Distract. Deny. Or be honest.
WWDC is going to happen. Arms among the audiences will be crossed, waiting for answers and clues. Apple will certainly have enough well-packaged announcements to distract at WWDC. They can’t deny their way out of the problems they brought on themselves. Being honest, however, can’t cause any more damage than has already been done.
I certainly wouldn’t want to be involved in the planning or presenting of this year’s WWDC event — even if it is pre-taped and packaged within an inch of its life. Apple has made its choice for The Talk Show Live. While the big packaged show always takes precedence, this year seems very ripe for a side show that clears the air a bit. As Parker Ortolani says, not having that will speak volumes. It is already a very loud signal about how things might play out going forward.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
#ai #Apple #JohnGruber #Mac #Tech #technology #TheTalkShow #WWDC #WWDC2025
-
Apple nie pojawi się na „The Talk Show Live” Johna Grubera podczas WWDC 2025
Po raz pierwszy od 2015 roku przedstawiciele Apple nie wezmą udziału w corocznym specjalnym odcinku podcastu „The Talk Show Live” Johna Grubera, organizowanym podczas konferencji WWDC. Decyzja ta budzi kontrowersje, zwłaszcza w świetle niedawnej krytyki Apple przez samego Grubera. Informację podało MacRumors.Choć oficjalnie Apple nie podało przyczyny, spekuluje się, że ma to związek z marcowym wpisem Grubera pt. „Coś jest nie tak w Cupertino”, w którym skrytykował firmę za prezentowanie niedokończonych funkcji Apple Intelligence i Siri na WWDC 2024. Według niego, Apple pokazało „technologiczne obietnice bez pokrycia” – coś, co wcześniej było nie do pomyślenia w ich strategii.
Gruber, będący blisko Apple przez lata, otwarcie zarzucił firmie odejście od dotychczasowej transparentności i rzetelności w prezentacjach.
A może Apple unika trudnych pytań? Gruber nie jest jedynym dziennikarzem, który mówi w ostatnim czasie o zaburzonych relacjach z PR-em Apple.
Nie możemy wykluczyć, że nieobecność u Grubera może być próbą uniknięcia niewygodnych pytań o opóźnienia Siri i stan faktyczny Apple Intelligence. Może to także świadczyć o napiętych relacjach między Apple a jednym z najważniejszych komentatorów technologicznych.
Rozmowę z poprzedniego roku znajdziecie poniżej i na każdej platformie podcastowej.
#Apple #AppleIntelligence #AppleNews_ #AppleWWDC #Cupertino #JohnGruber #krytykaApple #opóźnienieSiri #podcastTechnologiczny #relacjeZMediamiApple #Siri #technologia2025 #TheTalkShowLive #WWDC2025 #wydarzeniaApple
-
Keine Apple-Executive-Gäste beim WWDC-Talkshow-Live-Auftritt
Wenn Du wie viele andere treue Zuhörer:innen des Daring Fireball Podcasts bist, kennst Du wahrscheinlich die Tradition von John Gruber. Seit 2015 lädt er zu der jährlichen Spezialepisode von "T
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/keine-apple-executive-gaeste-beim-wwdc-talkshow-live-auftritt/
#News #Tellerrand #Apple #AppleIntelligence #AppleExecutives #DaringFireball #JohnGruber #Kritik #Siri #Technologien #TheTalkShow #WWDC -
Keine Apple-Executive-Gäste beim WWDC-Talkshow-Live-Auftritt
Wenn Du wie viele andere treue Zuhörer:innen des Daring Fireball Podcasts bist, kennst Du wahrscheinlich die Tradition von John Gruber. Seit 2015 lädt er zu der jährlichen Spezialepisode von "T
https://www.apfeltalk.de/magazin/news/keine-apple-executive-gaeste-beim-wwdc-talkshow-live-auftritt/
#News #Tellerrand #Apple #AppleIntelligence #AppleExecutives #DaringFireball #JohnGruber #Kritik #Siri #Technologien #TheTalkShow #WWDC