home.social

#davidhockney — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #davidhockney, aggregated by home.social.

  1. David Hockney print found in Norwich charity shop sells for eye-watering sum | News UK

    An eagle-eyed volunteer at the Salvation Army noticed the print (Picture: PA) A signed David Hockney print discovered in a donated…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artsanddesign #Art #Arts #ArtsAndDesign #DavidHockney #Design #Entertainment #Norwich #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/700886/

  2. Happy birthday Hockney: late British artist’s 89th marked with special London screening – The Art Newspaper

    A London institution is honouring the late British artist (and all-round superstar) David Hockney on what would have…
    #London #UnitedKingdom #UK #GB #England #Headlines #News #Europe #EU #Britain #DavidHockney #Diary #Exhibitions #GreatBritain #london
    europesays.com/uk/1079084/

  3. New piece: Nico Muhly restrained all the raw danger of his 2006 debut for the score of David Hockney's Bigger & Closer — and in that restraint, something closer to architecture emerges. On minimalism, Renaissance counterpoint, and Hockney's revolt against single-point perspective.
    hiroaki-satou.com/taming-dange

    #NicoMuhly #DavidHockney #AmbientMusic #PostClassical #Minimalism #Counterpoint #music

  4. The World According to David Hockney Is the Art Book You Need Right Now

    This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you click on them and make a purchase. It’s at no extra cost to you and helps us run this site. Thanks for your support!

    David Hockney died on June 11, 2026. He was 88 years old. For me personally, that news hit differently than most obituaries do. Hockney was one of my absolute favorite artists—not just because of the swimming pools, the Yorkshire landscapes, or the iPad drawings, but also because of how he saw. Relentlessly curious. Constitutionally optimistic. Addicted to looking. His passing makes The World According to David Hockney, published by Thames & Hudson and edited by art critic Martin Gayford, feel less like a collectible gift book and more like a necessary document. It’s one of the last direct windows into a mind that reshaped how we understand pictures.

    The book is available on Amazon.

    So let’s talk about this book honestly. Not as a tribute, not as a eulogy, but as the serious design and art publication review it deserves.

    What Makes a Quotation Book Worth Your Time and Shelf Space?

    Quotation anthologies have a reputation problem. Most feel assembled rather than curated—cherry-picked wisdom stapled together for seasonal gift-buying. The World According to David Hockney belongs to Thames & Hudson’s ongoing “The World According to” series, which has previously featured figures like Coco Chanel and Karl Lagerfeld. The format is familiar: short statements, thematic groupings, artwork interspersed throughout. But Hockney breaks the format’s usual limitations.

    Here’s why: Hockney was not merely quotable. He was a systematic thinker disguised as a wit. Every statement he made connected to a broader theory of vision, perception, and picture-making. When he said, “The eye is always moving; if it isn’t moving, you are dead,” he wasn’t being glib. He was articulating a philosophy of looking that runs through everything from his Cubist-influenced joiners to his final iPad paintings in Normandy. That coherence turns this anthology into something richer than its compact 176-page form suggests.

    Martin Gayford understands this. He’s spent decades in conversation with Hockney—their collaborative books A Bigger Message (2011), A History of Pictures (2016), and Spring Cannot Be Cancelled (2021) form one of contemporary art’s most productive intellectual friendships. His editorial hand is disciplined here. The selections feel like they come from someone who knows which statements were passing remarks and which were load-bearing ideas.

    The World According to David Hockney, a Thames & Hudson book written by David Hockney and edited by Martin Gayford. The book is available on Amazon.

    The Hockney Visibility Index: A Framework for Reading the Book

    After spending considerable time with this book—reading it straight through, then returning to it in fragments over weeks—I developed what I’d call the Hockney Visibility Index: a way of categorizing his statements by their layer of depth. It works in three tiers.

    Tier One: Surface Observations. These are the lines that travel well on social media. “I’ve always been a looker… that’s what artists do.” Punchy, elegant, instantly shareable. They feel like pure personality, but don’t underestimate them.

    Tier Two: Technical Convictions. Here Hockney makes precise claims about craft. “Painted color always will be better than printed color, because it is the pigment itself.” These statements carry the weight of someone who understood the material science of art-making. They’re provocations aimed squarely at photographers, digital artists, and anyone who thinks a screen can substitute for paint on canvas.

    Tier Three: Perceptual Philosophy. This is the deepest layer, and it’s where the book becomes genuinely essential. Hockney’s thinking about how we see—influenced heavily by Cézanne, by optics, by Chinese scroll painting—forms a coherent alternative theory of representation. His skepticism of the camera’s single fixed viewpoint runs throughout this tier. It’s serious intellectual territory, delivered in a pocket-sized format.

    Knowing which tier you’re reading at any moment helps you get more from the book. Otherwise, you risk skimming the Tier Three material as though it were Tier One.

    How Does the Book Actually Read? A Hands-On Assessment

    The physical object is genuinely lovely. At 5.1 × 7.1 inches and just under an inch thick, it sits perfectly in the hand. The binding doesn’t crack when you hold it open one-handed, which matters for a book you’ll return to repeatedly. Thames & Hudson’s production values are consistent here: the paper stock has a slight warmth, and the 39 color reproductions of Hockney’s work are handled with care. You get pieces from across his entire career—early Bradford paintings, the California pool series, the Yorkshire landscapes, digital iPad works.

    The sequencing is thematic rather than chronological, and that’s the right call. Gayford organizes the statements around subjects: drawing, seeing, photography, nature, creativity, technology, other artists. Each section opens with a concentration of Hockney’s voice before an artwork punctuates the thought. This rhythm works. It mimics how Hockney himself tended to talk—circling an idea from multiple angles before landing somewhere unexpected.

    What surprised me most was how consistently the book held up to re-reading. Many quotation anthologies exhaust themselves on first pass. This one doesn’t. Because Hockney’s ideas interconnect so densely, returning to a Tier One statement after reading a Tier Three one reframes it entirely. The book rewards slow, non-linear reading.

    Hockney on Photography: His Most Misunderstood Position

    A significant portion of the book addresses photography, and I want to spend time here because Hockney’s position is frequently misread as technophobia. It wasn’t. He embraced photocollage, video, and digital technology enthusiastically throughout his career. His objection was more specific—and more interesting.

    Hockney argued that the photographic lens produces a monocular, single-moment view of the world. Consequently, it flattens duration and denies the viewer the experience of moving through space. His joiners—those grids of Polaroid photographs assembled to create fragmented, multi-perspective images—were a direct response to this limitation. He wasn’t rejecting photography. He was trying to make it see the way human eyes actually see.

    Similarly, his use of the iPad wasn’t a late-career novelty. It was a logical extension of the same argument: drawing tools that let you work quickly, spontaneously, and directly with color. When he said “painted color always will be better than printed color, because it is the pigment itself,” he was making a claim about materiality, about the physical presence of pigment in space. It’s a sculptural argument hidden inside a painter’s sentence.

    The book surfaces these connections clearly. After reading it, you understand Hockney’s entire arc—from Bradford to Los Angeles to East Yorkshire to Normandy—as a single continuous inquiry into the question: what does it actually mean to look at something?

    What Does the Book Reveal About Hockney’s Influences?

    Hockney’s dialogue with art history is one of the book’s quiet pleasures. His statements about Caravaggio, Cézanne, Hokusai, and Walt Disney reveal something important: he treated all image-makers as colleagues rather than ancestors. The historical distance didn’t make them remote for him. It made them more interesting, because he could study their technical choices without the noise of their contemporary reception.

    His observations on Cézanne are particularly striking. Hockney saw Cézanne not as the father of modernism—the standard art history framing—but as a radical perceptualist who was trying to paint the experience of looking over time rather than the fixed appearance of a scene. That reading directly informed Hockney’s own multi-perspective work. And it’s a reading you can develop slowly through this book, assembling it from fragments across multiple sections.

    Walt Disney appearing in the same company as Caravaggio might raise eyebrows. But Hockney was serious about it. He recognized Disney’s mastery of movement, line, and the grammar of visual narrative. For Hockney, the hierarchy separating “fine art” from “illustration” or “commercial image-making” was largely artificial. What mattered was whether the image worked—whether it made you see.

    That democratic approach to visual culture is everywhere in this book, and it feels increasingly relevant as the boundary between art, design, and digital image-making continues to blur.

    The Hockney Attentional Loop: Why His Ideas on Looking Matter Now

    I want to introduce another framework here: the Hockney Attentional Loop. It describes the cycle Hockney believed all genuine looking involved—and which he argued contemporary visual culture was systematically breaking.

    The loop works like this: Attention → Curiosity → Drawing/Mark-Making → Deeper Attention. For Hockney, drawing was not a means of recording what you see. Rather, it was the mechanism that forced you to actually see in the first place. “Drawing makes you see things clearer and clearer and clearer still,” he said. The act of putting pencil to paper—or stylus to iPad—activated a quality of attention that passive looking never could.

    This has direct implications for how we engage with design, photography, and digital image-making today. We produce and consume images at a volume and speed that structurally prevent the Hockney Attentional Loop from completing. Furthermore, we look without drawing. And we see without attending. The book, to its credit, creates the conditions for that loop to run again—because Hockney’s statements force you to slow down and think about the mechanics of your own perception.

    In an era of AI-generated imagery, scroll fatigue, and algorithmic visual feeds, that’s not a minor gift. It’s a corrective.

    Is The World According to David Hockney Worth Buying? An Honest Assessment

    Let me be direct. This book is not a substitute for A History of Pictures or Secret Knowledge if you want Hockney’s ideas developed at full length. Those are the texts where his perceptual philosophy gets the space it deserves. But The World According to David Hockney serves a different and genuinely valuable function: it’s a portable distillation of a singular intelligence. You can carry it in a jacket pocket. You can open it at any page and find something worth thinking about. And you can give it to someone who’s never seriously engaged with Hockney and watch it change their relationship to looking.

    At 176 pages and a compact format, it’s priced accessibly too. Thames & Hudson’s production quality ensures it doesn’t feel cheap despite its size—this isn’t a filler gift. The 39 color illustrations do real work, and Gayford’s curation is tight enough that almost nothing feels redundant.

    For designers, typographers, photographers, and anyone working visually, this book is more relevant to your practice than you might expect. Hockney thought about images with the precision of a craftsperson and the appetite of a philosopher. His observations on color, on the relationship between line and space, on why certain pictures hold your attention and others don’t—these are genuinely practical. They’ll change how you look at your own work.

    Beyond its practical value, though, I recommend this book as an act of mourning and celebration. Hockney passed on June 11, 2026. He left behind one of the richest bodies of work in twentieth- and twenty-first-century art. This small volume captures his voice with unusual fidelity. Reading it now feels like sitting with someone who insisted, until the very end, that looking at the world was one of the most worthwhile things a human being could do.

    He was right about that.

    What Does The World According to David Hockney Predict for Art’s Future?

    Hockney was a consistent futurist about one specific thing: the persistence of the handmade image. Throughout his later career, he argued that painting and drawing would survive photography, video, and digital technology—not because they were superior, but because they offered something those media fundamentally couldn’t replicate. The material trace of a hand. The duration of attention embedded in a mark. The irreducibility of pigment as a physical substance in space.

    My prediction, influenced by this book: as AI-generated imagery becomes ubiquitous, the cultural value of handmade visual work will increase sharply. Not because AI images are bad, but because the process of making by hand carries information that the output alone cannot convey. Collectors, curators, and design-literate audiences will increasingly distinguish between images that record looking and images that perform it. Hockney articulated this distinction decades before it became urgent.

    That’s what makes this book feel so timely. It’s not a backward glance at a great artist’s career. It’s a manifesto for a particular kind of attention—one we need more of, not less.

    The book is available on Amazon.

    Frequently Asked Questions About The World According to David Hockney

    Who is the target audience for The World According to David Hockney?

    The book works well for anyone interested in art, design, photography, or visual culture. It requires no prior knowledge of Hockney’s work, though existing fans will find extra layers of meaning. Art students, practicing designers, and general readers curious about creativity will all find genuine value in it.

    How does The World According to David Hockney differ from his other books?

    Unlike A Bigger Message or A History of Pictures—which develop ideas through extended conversation with Martin Gayford—this book is structured as a curated anthology of short statements. It’s more portable and accessible, designed for dipping into rather than reading cover to cover, though it also rewards linear reading.

    Is this book suitable as a gift for someone who doesn’t know Hockney’s work?

    Yes, and arguably it’s a better entry point than a full monograph. The compact format, the accessible writing, and the reproductions of his most iconic works give new readers a strong introduction without overwhelming them. It functions as both a standalone book and as a gateway to his broader practice.

    Does the book address Hockney’s digital and iPad work?

    Yes. The book includes Hockney’s views on technology, the internet, and digital tools. His perspective is nuanced—he embraced new media enthusiastically while consistently arguing that digital color cannot replicate the material qualities of painted pigment. This tension is one of the book’s most intellectually interesting threads.

    What is the physical quality of the book like?

    The book is hardcover, compact at 5.1 × 7.1 inches, and contains 39 color illustrations. The production quality is consistent with Thames & Hudson’s standards: solid binding, warm paper stock, and well-reproduced artwork. It feels like a proper book rather than a promotional object, despite its gift-book positioning.

    Where can I buy The World According to David Hockney?

    The book is available through major online retailers, including Amazon, as well as directly from Thames & Hudson. It’s also stocked by most independent art bookshops. The ISBN is 978-0500027042.

    How does Martin Gayford’s role as editor shape the book?

    Gayford’s long collaborative relationship with Hockney—spanning multiple books and decades of conversation—makes him an unusually qualified editor for this project. His selections reflect deep familiarity with which of Hockney’s statements were central convictions versus passing remarks. The result is a more coherent anthology than a less informed editor would have produced.

    Browse WE AND THE COLOR’s Art and Books categories for more.

    #amazon #art #artBook #artist #book #DavidHockney #TheWorldAccordingToDavidHockney
  5. The World According to David Hockney Is the Art Book You Need Right Now

    This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you click on them and make a purchase. It’s at no extra cost to you and helps us run this site. Thanks for your support!

    David Hockney died on June 11, 2026. He was 88 years old. For me personally, that news hit differently than most obituaries do. Hockney was one of my absolute favorite artists—not just because of the swimming pools, the Yorkshire landscapes, or the iPad drawings, but also because of how he saw. Relentlessly curious. Constitutionally optimistic. Addicted to looking. His passing makes The World According to David Hockney, published by Thames & Hudson and edited by art critic Martin Gayford, feel less like a collectible gift book and more like a necessary document. It’s one of the last direct windows into a mind that reshaped how we understand pictures.

    The book is available on Amazon.

    So let’s talk about this book honestly. Not as a tribute, not as a eulogy, but as the serious design and art publication review it deserves.

    What Makes a Quotation Book Worth Your Time and Shelf Space?

    Quotation anthologies have a reputation problem. Most feel assembled rather than curated—cherry-picked wisdom stapled together for seasonal gift-buying. The World According to David Hockney belongs to Thames & Hudson’s ongoing “The World According to” series, which has previously featured figures like Coco Chanel and Karl Lagerfeld. The format is familiar: short statements, thematic groupings, artwork interspersed throughout. But Hockney breaks the format’s usual limitations.

    Here’s why: Hockney was not merely quotable. He was a systematic thinker disguised as a wit. Every statement he made connected to a broader theory of vision, perception, and picture-making. When he said, “The eye is always moving; if it isn’t moving, you are dead,” he wasn’t being glib. He was articulating a philosophy of looking that runs through everything from his Cubist-influenced joiners to his final iPad paintings in Normandy. That coherence turns this anthology into something richer than its compact 176-page form suggests.

    Martin Gayford understands this. He’s spent decades in conversation with Hockney—their collaborative books A Bigger Message (2011), A History of Pictures (2016), and Spring Cannot Be Cancelled (2021) form one of contemporary art’s most productive intellectual friendships. His editorial hand is disciplined here. The selections feel like they come from someone who knows which statements were passing remarks and which were load-bearing ideas.

    The World According to David Hockney, a Thames & Hudson book written by David Hockney and edited by Martin Gayford. The book is available on Amazon.

    The Hockney Visibility Index: A Framework for Reading the Book

    After spending considerable time with this book—reading it straight through, then returning to it in fragments over weeks—I developed what I’d call the Hockney Visibility Index: a way of categorizing his statements by their layer of depth. It works in three tiers.

    Tier One: Surface Observations. These are the lines that travel well on social media. “I’ve always been a looker… that’s what artists do.” Punchy, elegant, instantly shareable. They feel like pure personality, but don’t underestimate them.

    Tier Two: Technical Convictions. Here Hockney makes precise claims about craft. “Painted color always will be better than printed color, because it is the pigment itself.” These statements carry the weight of someone who understood the material science of art-making. They’re provocations aimed squarely at photographers, digital artists, and anyone who thinks a screen can substitute for paint on canvas.

    Tier Three: Perceptual Philosophy. This is the deepest layer, and it’s where the book becomes genuinely essential. Hockney’s thinking about how we see—influenced heavily by Cézanne, by optics, by Chinese scroll painting—forms a coherent alternative theory of representation. His skepticism of the camera’s single fixed viewpoint runs throughout this tier. It’s serious intellectual territory, delivered in a pocket-sized format.

    Knowing which tier you’re reading at any moment helps you get more from the book. Otherwise, you risk skimming the Tier Three material as though it were Tier One.

    How Does the Book Actually Read? A Hands-On Assessment

    The physical object is genuinely lovely. At 5.1 × 7.1 inches and just under an inch thick, it sits perfectly in the hand. The binding doesn’t crack when you hold it open one-handed, which matters for a book you’ll return to repeatedly. Thames & Hudson’s production values are consistent here: the paper stock has a slight warmth, and the 39 color reproductions of Hockney’s work are handled with care. You get pieces from across his entire career—early Bradford paintings, the California pool series, the Yorkshire landscapes, digital iPad works.

    The sequencing is thematic rather than chronological, and that’s the right call. Gayford organizes the statements around subjects: drawing, seeing, photography, nature, creativity, technology, other artists. Each section opens with a concentration of Hockney’s voice before an artwork punctuates the thought. This rhythm works. It mimics how Hockney himself tended to talk—circling an idea from multiple angles before landing somewhere unexpected.

    What surprised me most was how consistently the book held up to re-reading. Many quotation anthologies exhaust themselves on first pass. This one doesn’t. Because Hockney’s ideas interconnect so densely, returning to a Tier One statement after reading a Tier Three one reframes it entirely. The book rewards slow, non-linear reading.

    Hockney on Photography: His Most Misunderstood Position

    A significant portion of the book addresses photography, and I want to spend time here because Hockney’s position is frequently misread as technophobia. It wasn’t. He embraced photocollage, video, and digital technology enthusiastically throughout his career. His objection was more specific—and more interesting.

    Hockney argued that the photographic lens produces a monocular, single-moment view of the world. Consequently, it flattens duration and denies the viewer the experience of moving through space. His joiners—those grids of Polaroid photographs assembled to create fragmented, multi-perspective images—were a direct response to this limitation. He wasn’t rejecting photography. He was trying to make it see the way human eyes actually see.

    Similarly, his use of the iPad wasn’t a late-career novelty. It was a logical extension of the same argument: drawing tools that let you work quickly, spontaneously, and directly with color. When he said “painted color always will be better than printed color, because it is the pigment itself,” he was making a claim about materiality, about the physical presence of pigment in space. It’s a sculptural argument hidden inside a painter’s sentence.

    The book surfaces these connections clearly. After reading it, you understand Hockney’s entire arc—from Bradford to Los Angeles to East Yorkshire to Normandy—as a single continuous inquiry into the question: what does it actually mean to look at something?

    What Does the Book Reveal About Hockney’s Influences?

    Hockney’s dialogue with art history is one of the book’s quiet pleasures. His statements about Caravaggio, Cézanne, Hokusai, and Walt Disney reveal something important: he treated all image-makers as colleagues rather than ancestors. The historical distance didn’t make them remote for him. It made them more interesting, because he could study their technical choices without the noise of their contemporary reception.

    His observations on Cézanne are particularly striking. Hockney saw Cézanne not as the father of modernism—the standard art history framing—but as a radical perceptualist who was trying to paint the experience of looking over time rather than the fixed appearance of a scene. That reading directly informed Hockney’s own multi-perspective work. And it’s a reading you can develop slowly through this book, assembling it from fragments across multiple sections.

    Walt Disney appearing in the same company as Caravaggio might raise eyebrows. But Hockney was serious about it. He recognized Disney’s mastery of movement, line, and the grammar of visual narrative. For Hockney, the hierarchy separating “fine art” from “illustration” or “commercial image-making” was largely artificial. What mattered was whether the image worked—whether it made you see.

    That democratic approach to visual culture is everywhere in this book, and it feels increasingly relevant as the boundary between art, design, and digital image-making continues to blur.

    The Hockney Attentional Loop: Why His Ideas on Looking Matter Now

    I want to introduce another framework here: the Hockney Attentional Loop. It describes the cycle Hockney believed all genuine looking involved—and which he argued contemporary visual culture was systematically breaking.

    The loop works like this: Attention → Curiosity → Drawing/Mark-Making → Deeper Attention. For Hockney, drawing was not a means of recording what you see. Rather, it was the mechanism that forced you to actually see in the first place. “Drawing makes you see things clearer and clearer and clearer still,” he said. The act of putting pencil to paper—or stylus to iPad—activated a quality of attention that passive looking never could.

    This has direct implications for how we engage with design, photography, and digital image-making today. We produce and consume images at a volume and speed that structurally prevent the Hockney Attentional Loop from completing. Furthermore, we look without drawing. And we see without attending. The book, to its credit, creates the conditions for that loop to run again—because Hockney’s statements force you to slow down and think about the mechanics of your own perception.

    In an era of AI-generated imagery, scroll fatigue, and algorithmic visual feeds, that’s not a minor gift. It’s a corrective.

    Is The World According to David Hockney Worth Buying? An Honest Assessment

    Let me be direct. This book is not a substitute for A History of Pictures or Secret Knowledge if you want Hockney’s ideas developed at full length. Those are the texts where his perceptual philosophy gets the space it deserves. But The World According to David Hockney serves a different and genuinely valuable function: it’s a portable distillation of a singular intelligence. You can carry it in a jacket pocket. You can open it at any page and find something worth thinking about. And you can give it to someone who’s never seriously engaged with Hockney and watch it change their relationship to looking.

    At 176 pages and a compact format, it’s priced accessibly too. Thames & Hudson’s production quality ensures it doesn’t feel cheap despite its size—this isn’t a filler gift. The 39 color illustrations do real work, and Gayford’s curation is tight enough that almost nothing feels redundant.

    For designers, typographers, photographers, and anyone working visually, this book is more relevant to your practice than you might expect. Hockney thought about images with the precision of a craftsperson and the appetite of a philosopher. His observations on color, on the relationship between line and space, on why certain pictures hold your attention and others don’t—these are genuinely practical. They’ll change how you look at your own work.

    Beyond its practical value, though, I recommend this book as an act of mourning and celebration. Hockney passed on June 11, 2026. He left behind one of the richest bodies of work in twentieth- and twenty-first-century art. This small volume captures his voice with unusual fidelity. Reading it now feels like sitting with someone who insisted, until the very end, that looking at the world was one of the most worthwhile things a human being could do.

    He was right about that.

    What Does The World According to David Hockney Predict for Art’s Future?

    Hockney was a consistent futurist about one specific thing: the persistence of the handmade image. Throughout his later career, he argued that painting and drawing would survive photography, video, and digital technology—not because they were superior, but because they offered something those media fundamentally couldn’t replicate. The material trace of a hand. The duration of attention embedded in a mark. The irreducibility of pigment as a physical substance in space.

    My prediction, influenced by this book: as AI-generated imagery becomes ubiquitous, the cultural value of handmade visual work will increase sharply. Not because AI images are bad, but because the process of making by hand carries information that the output alone cannot convey. Collectors, curators, and design-literate audiences will increasingly distinguish between images that record looking and images that perform it. Hockney articulated this distinction decades before it became urgent.

    That’s what makes this book feel so timely. It’s not a backward glance at a great artist’s career. It’s a manifesto for a particular kind of attention—one we need more of, not less.

    The book is available on Amazon.

    Frequently Asked Questions About The World According to David Hockney

    Who is the target audience for The World According to David Hockney?

    The book works well for anyone interested in art, design, photography, or visual culture. It requires no prior knowledge of Hockney’s work, though existing fans will find extra layers of meaning. Art students, practicing designers, and general readers curious about creativity will all find genuine value in it.

    How does The World According to David Hockney differ from his other books?

    Unlike A Bigger Message or A History of Pictures—which develop ideas through extended conversation with Martin Gayford—this book is structured as a curated anthology of short statements. It’s more portable and accessible, designed for dipping into rather than reading cover to cover, though it also rewards linear reading.

    Is this book suitable as a gift for someone who doesn’t know Hockney’s work?

    Yes, and arguably it’s a better entry point than a full monograph. The compact format, the accessible writing, and the reproductions of his most iconic works give new readers a strong introduction without overwhelming them. It functions as both a standalone book and as a gateway to his broader practice.

    Does the book address Hockney’s digital and iPad work?

    Yes. The book includes Hockney’s views on technology, the internet, and digital tools. His perspective is nuanced—he embraced new media enthusiastically while consistently arguing that digital color cannot replicate the material qualities of painted pigment. This tension is one of the book’s most intellectually interesting threads.

    What is the physical quality of the book like?

    The book is hardcover, compact at 5.1 × 7.1 inches, and contains 39 color illustrations. The production quality is consistent with Thames & Hudson’s standards: solid binding, warm paper stock, and well-reproduced artwork. It feels like a proper book rather than a promotional object, despite its gift-book positioning.

    Where can I buy The World According to David Hockney?

    The book is available through major online retailers, including Amazon, as well as directly from Thames & Hudson. It’s also stocked by most independent art bookshops. The ISBN is 978-0500027042.

    How does Martin Gayford’s role as editor shape the book?

    Gayford’s long collaborative relationship with Hockney—spanning multiple books and decades of conversation—makes him an unusually qualified editor for this project. His selections reflect deep familiarity with which of Hockney’s statements were central convictions versus passing remarks. The result is a more coherent anthology than a less informed editor would have produced.

    Browse WE AND THE COLOR’s Art and Books categories for more.

    #amazon #art #artBook #artist #book #DavidHockney #TheWorldAccordingToDavidHockney
  6. Splashing out: Hockney painting on sale for £9m at Art Basel

    At Richard Gray, gallerists clinked champagne flutes after Hockney’s Studio Interior #2 from 2014 sold for $8.5m. Pace,…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artsanddesign #Art #Arts #ArtsAndDesign #DavidHockney #Design #Entertainment #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/652018/

  7. Splashing out: Hockney painting on sale for £9m at Art Basel

    At Richard Gray, gallerists clinked champagne flutes after Hockney’s Studio Interior #2 from 2014 sold for $8.5m. Pace,…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artsanddesign #Art #Arts #ArtsAndDesign #DavidHockney #Design #Entertainment #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/652018/

  8. Splashing out: Hockney painting on sale for £9m at Art Basel

    At Richard Gray, gallerists clinked champagne flutes after Hockney’s Studio Interior #2 from 2014 sold for $8.5m. Pace,…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artsanddesign #Art #Arts #ArtsAndDesign #AU #Australia #DavidHockney #Design #Entertainment
    newsbeep.com/au/752520/

  9. Splashing out: Hockney painting on sale for £9m at Art Basel

    At Richard Gray, gallerists clinked champagne flutes after Hockney’s Studio Interior #2 from 2014 sold for $8.5m. Pace,…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artsanddesign #Art #Arts #ArtsAndDesign #AU #Australia #DavidHockney #Design #Entertainment
    newsbeep.com/au/752520/

  10. David Hockney’s passing brought me back to the few monographs I own and the many books available at the Institute of Art History in Munich.

    What captivated me most was his unique approach to graphic portraits, always referencing the great artists of the past: from Rembrandt’s „selfies“ to Ingres’ delicate pencil miniatures on paper.

    #davidhockney #portrait #drawings

  11. David Hockney’s passing brought me back to the few monographs I own and the many books available at the Institute of Art History in Munich.

    What captivated me most was his unique approach to graphic portraits, always referencing the great artists of the past: from Rembrandt’s „selfies“ to Ingres’ delicate pencil miniatures on paper.

    #davidhockney #portrait #drawings

  12. David Hockney and the art of seeing in an age of upheaval

    David Hockney’s death at 88 closes one of the most remarkable careers in modern art. He was admired…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artsanddesign #Art #Arts #ArtsAndDesign #AU #Australia #DavidHockney #Design #Entertainment #obituary #PAINTING
    newsbeep.com/au/748393/

  13. David Hockney and the art of seeing in an age of upheaval

    David Hockney’s death at 88 closes one of the most remarkable careers in modern art. He was admired…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artsanddesign #Art #Arts #ArtsAndDesign #AU #Australia #DavidHockney #Design #Entertainment #obituary #PAINTING
    newsbeep.com/au/748393/

  14. David Hockney and the art of seeing in an age of upheaval

    David Hockney’s death at 88 closes one of the most remarkable careers in modern art. He was admired…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artsanddesign #art #Arts #ArtsAndDesign #CA #Canada #DavidHockney #Design #Entertainment #obituary #painting
    newsbeep.com/ca/749021/

  15. David Hockney, Beyond the Pool

    Eng with subs.

    arte.tv/en/videos/071420-000-A

    53 min/ Available until 11/09/2026

    Arte has plenty of art related content. You might need a vpn from some areas. No ads.

    #arte #artist #art #video #painter #documentary #David #Hockney #davidhockney #movie #pools #swimmingpools #アート