home.social

#bikeshed — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #bikeshed, aggregated by home.social.

  1. I just generated a new #ssh ed25519 key, as the old one had a few years on its back.
    I will use it for all my ssh connection needs.
    Let the #bikeshed begin: should I also start using it to sign my git commits, instead of my current (and even older, but well known on the WoT) #GPG key?
    This question partially inspired by the recent @soatok post reminding me the stark reality that the WoT has failed to deliver.
    (there's also the reality that nobody really even cares if I sign my commits or not, but I will continue doing it in spite of it, of course)
  2. I just generated a new #ssh ed25519 key, as the old one had a few years on its back.
    I will use it for all my ssh connection needs.
    Let the #bikeshed begin: should I also start using it to sign my git commits, instead of my current (and even older, but well known on the WoT) #GPG key?
    This question partially inspired by the recent @soatok post reminding me the stark reality that the WoT has failed to deliver.
    (there's also the reality that nobody really even cares if I sign my commits or not, but I will continue doing it in spite of it, of course)
  3. I just generated a new #ssh ed25519 key, as the old one had a few years on its back.
    I will use it for all my ssh connection needs.
    Let the #bikeshed begin: should I also start using it to sign my git commits, instead of my current (and even older, but well known on the WoT) #GPG key?
    This question partially inspired by the recent @soatok post reminding me the stark reality that the WoT has failed to deliver.
    (there's also the reality that nobody really even cares if I sign my commits or not, but I will continue doing it in spite of it, of course)
  4. I just generated a new #ssh ed25519 key, as the old one had a few years on its back.
    I will use it for all my ssh connection needs.
    Let the #bikeshed begin: should I also start using it to sign my git commits, instead of my current (and even older, but well known on the WoT) #GPG key?
    This question partially inspired by the recent @soatok post reminding me the stark reality that the WoT has failed to deliver.
    (there's also the reality that nobody really even cares if I sign my commits or not, but I will continue doing it in spite of it, of course)
  5. Ugh, long day.
    Off to Shoreditch now to see a friend, and go to the Bike Shed. Wish I had my motorcycle with me 😭.

  6. Ugh, long day.
    Off to Shoreditch now to see a friend, and go to the Bike Shed. Wish I had my motorcycle with me 😭.

    #bikeshed #motorcycle #motorbike #london

  7. Ugh, long day.
    Off to Shoreditch now to see a friend, and go to the Bike Shed. Wish I had my motorcycle with me 😭.

    #bikeshed #motorcycle #motorbike #london

  8. Ugh, long day.
    Off to Shoreditch now to see a friend, and go to the Bike Shed. Wish I had my motorcycle with me 😭.

    #bikeshed #motorcycle #motorbike #london

  9. Ugh, long day.
    Off to Shoreditch now to see a friend, and go to the Bike Shed. Wish I had my motorcycle with me 😭.

    #bikeshed #motorcycle #motorbike #london

  10. @SteveBellovin @hpk

    Not to #bikeshed but...

    In my experience asking "whom?" only works if the person you ask have a competent(-ish) threat-model, which no normal people do.

    The implicit focus on intentionality also downplays the much more frequent accidental loss of control.

    At least for me, it works better to ask what outcomes we are trying to avoid, and work through both the intentional, incidental and accidental scenarios that lead there.

  11. @SteveBellovin @hpk

    Not to but...

    In my experience asking "whom?" only works if the person you ask have a competent(-ish) threat-model, which no normal people do.

    The implicit focus on intentionality also downplays the much more frequent accidental loss of control.

    At least for me, it works better to ask what outcomes we are trying to avoid, and work through both the intentional, incidental and accidental scenarios that lead there.

  12. @SteveBellovin @hpk

    Not to #bikeshed but...

    In my experience asking "whom?" only works if the person you ask have a competent(-ish) threat-model, which no normal people do.

    The implicit focus on intentionality also downplays the much more frequent accidental loss of control.

    At least for me, it works better to ask what outcomes we are trying to avoid, and work through both the intentional, incidental and accidental scenarios that lead there.

  13. @SteveBellovin @hpk

    Not to #bikeshed but...

    In my experience asking "whom?" only works if the person you ask have a competent(-ish) threat-model, which no normal people do.

    The implicit focus on intentionality also downplays the much more frequent accidental loss of control.

    At least for me, it works better to ask what outcomes we are trying to avoid, and work through both the intentional, incidental and accidental scenarios that lead there.

  14. @SteveBellovin @hpk

    Not to #bikeshed but...

    In my experience asking "whom?" only works if the person you ask have a competent(-ish) threat-model, which no normal people do.

    The implicit focus on intentionality also downplays the much more frequent accidental loss of control.

    At least for me, it works better to ask what outcomes we are trying to avoid, and work through both the intentional, incidental and accidental scenarios that lead there.

  15. @quino_schuetz
    Kleine Hinzufügung:

    Wäre die Radfahrinfrastruktur ähnlich gut ausgebaut wie die für Autofahrende, es würde weniger "Alleinunfälle" unter Radfahrenden geben.

    Aber lasst uns lieber über Helme reden.

    #bikeshed

  16. @quino_schuetz
    Kleine Hinzufügung:

    Wäre die Radfahrinfrastruktur ähnlich gut ausgebaut wie die für Autofahrende, es würde weniger "Alleinunfälle" unter Radfahrenden geben.

    Aber lasst uns lieber über Helme reden.

    #bikeshed

  17. @quino_schuetz
    Kleine Hinzufügung:

    Wäre die Radfahrinfrastruktur ähnlich gut ausgebaut wie die für Autofahrende, es würde weniger "Alleinunfälle" unter Radfahrenden geben.

    Aber lasst uns lieber über Helme reden.

    #bikeshed

  18. @quino_schuetz
    Kleine Hinzufügung:

    Wäre die Radfahrinfrastruktur ähnlich gut ausgebaut wie die für Autofahrende, es würde weniger "Alleinunfälle" unter Radfahrenden geben.

    Aber lasst uns lieber über Helme reden.

    #bikeshed

  19. @quino_schuetz
    Kleine Hinzufügung:

    Wäre die Radfahrinfrastruktur ähnlich gut ausgebaut wie die für Autofahrende, es würde weniger "Alleinunfälle" unter Radfahrenden geben.

    Aber lasst uns lieber über Helme reden.

    #bikeshed

  20. Also, did I mention we chose grey on red concrete paver? #bikeshed

  21. Also, did I mention we chose grey on red concrete paver? #bikeshed

  22. Also, did I mention we chose grey on red concrete paver? #bikeshed

  23. Also, did I mention we chose grey on red concrete paver? #bikeshed

  24. Also, did I mention we chose grey on red concrete paver? #bikeshed