#ancient-values — Public Fediverse posts

Birutė – one of the most mysterious women in 14th-century Lithuania

The wife of Kęstutis and mother of Vytautas the Great, her story is intertwined with legend. According to tradition, she was a vaidilutė – a keeper of the sacred pagan fire in Palanga – until Kęstutis took her to Trakai and married her.

According to tradition, Birutė was laid to rest in Palanga. Today, Birutė Hill – one of Lithuania’s most iconic sacred sites – still bears her name and keeps her memory alive.

link

Birutė – one of the most mysterious women in 14th-century Lithuania

The wife of Kęstutis and mother of Vytautas the Great, her story is intertwined with legend. According to tradition, she was a vaidilutė – a keeper of the sacred pagan fire in Palanga – until Kęstutis took her to Trakai and married her.

According to tradition, Birutė was laid to rest in Palanga. Today, Birutė Hill – one of Lithuania’s most iconic sacred sites – still bears her name and keeps her memory alive.

link

Birutė – one of the most mysterious women in 14th-century Lithuania

The wife of Kęstutis and mother of Vytautas the Great, her story is intertwined with legend. According to tradition, she was a vaidilutė – a keeper of the sacred pagan fire in Palanga – until Kęstutis took her to Trakai and married her.

According to tradition, Birutė was laid to rest in Palanga. Today, Birutė Hill – one of Lithuania’s most iconic sacred sites – still bears her name and keeps her memory alive.

link

Birutė – one of the most mysterious women in 14th-century Lithuania

The wife of Kęstutis and mother of Vytautas the Great, her story is intertwined with legend. According to tradition, she was a vaidilutė – a keeper of the sacred pagan fire in Palanga – until Kęstutis took her to Trakai and married her.

According to tradition, Birutė was laid to rest in Palanga. Today, Birutė Hill – one of Lithuania’s most iconic sacred sites – still bears her name and keeps her memory alive.

link

Birutė – one of the most mysterious women in 14th-century Lithuania

The wife of Kęstutis and mother of Vytautas the Great, her story is intertwined with legend. According to tradition, she was a vaidilutė – a keeper of the sacred pagan fire in Palanga – until Kęstutis took her to Trakai and married her.

According to tradition, Birutė was laid to rest in Palanga. Today, Birutė Hill – one of Lithuania’s most iconic sacred sites – still bears her name and keeps her memory alive.

link

How ‘Israelism’ Has Replaced Christianity as the American Civic Religion — Ron Unz

The recent article presents a thought-provoking comparison of the ideological shifts in the United States and Russia, exploring how the two nations, once defined by their stark opposing ideologies during the Cold War, have now transitioned into unexpected roles. The author highlights that while the U.S. retains a predominantly Christian heritage, this identity has been largely stripped from its public and political life, resembling the Soviet era’s suppression of religion. In stark contrast, modern Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, has embraced Christianity as a cornerstone of its national identity, marking a significant ideological shift from its communist past. This paradox raises questions about the true nature of American identity and its relationship with Christianity.

The article also delves into the historical context of Russia’s religious landscape, particularly during the Bolshevik Revolution, which violently suppressed Christianity, leading to the near extinction of the Russian Orthodox Church. The author notes that despite the ideological battle against communism, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were both predominantly Christian nations, albeit with one under communist oppression. This historical reflection serves to underscore the irony of America’s current situation—although it has a Christian majority, the prevailing political atmosphere actively works against the expression of that identity in public life.

The piece further examines the role of American Christian leaders and the disconnect between their support for Israel and the struggles faced by Christian communities in the Middle East. The author criticizes the growing phenomenon of Christian Zionism, a belief system that prioritizes support for Israel often at the expense of Christian communities suffering under Israeli governance. Interviews conducted by Tucker Carlson with various Christian leaders and activists have revealed the troubling dynamics at play, where American Christians remain largely unaware of the persecution faced by their counterparts in the Holy Land due to a prevailing narrative that champions Israel unconditionally.

As the article concludes, it emphasizes the growing conflict between American Christian values and the political ideologies that dominate contemporary discourse, especially regarding Israel and its treatment of Christian communities in the Middle East. The author posits that the shift towards “Israelism” as a quasi-religious doctrine has replaced traditional Christian values in American politics, leading to a troubling disregard for Christian suffering abroad. This situation presents a significant challenge to the identity of American Christianity, as it grapples with its role within a society that increasingly prioritizes political expediency over religious fidelity. The article ultimately calls for a reevaluation of the American Christian stance towards Israel and the implications it has for global Christian communities.

link

The above is a summary of a longer article supplied by the site posting the article. ABN

How ‘Israelism’ Has Replaced Christianity as the American Civic Religion — Ron Unz

The recent article presents a thought-provoking comparison of the ideological shifts in the United States and Russia, exploring how the two nations, once defined by their stark opposing ideologies during the Cold War, have now transitioned into unexpected roles. The author highlights that while the U.S. retains a predominantly Christian heritage, this identity has been largely stripped from its public and political life, resembling the Soviet era’s suppression of religion. In stark contrast, modern Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, has embraced Christianity as a cornerstone of its national identity, marking a significant ideological shift from its communist past. This paradox raises questions about the true nature of American identity and its relationship with Christianity.

The article also delves into the historical context of Russia’s religious landscape, particularly during the Bolshevik Revolution, which violently suppressed Christianity, leading to the near extinction of the Russian Orthodox Church. The author notes that despite the ideological battle against communism, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were both predominantly Christian nations, albeit with one under communist oppression. This historical reflection serves to underscore the irony of America’s current situation—although it has a Christian majority, the prevailing political atmosphere actively works against the expression of that identity in public life.

The piece further examines the role of American Christian leaders and the disconnect between their support for Israel and the struggles faced by Christian communities in the Middle East. The author criticizes the growing phenomenon of Christian Zionism, a belief system that prioritizes support for Israel often at the expense of Christian communities suffering under Israeli governance. Interviews conducted by Tucker Carlson with various Christian leaders and activists have revealed the troubling dynamics at play, where American Christians remain largely unaware of the persecution faced by their counterparts in the Holy Land due to a prevailing narrative that champions Israel unconditionally.

As the article concludes, it emphasizes the growing conflict between American Christian values and the political ideologies that dominate contemporary discourse, especially regarding Israel and its treatment of Christian communities in the Middle East. The author posits that the shift towards “Israelism” as a quasi-religious doctrine has replaced traditional Christian values in American politics, leading to a troubling disregard for Christian suffering abroad. This situation presents a significant challenge to the identity of American Christianity, as it grapples with its role within a society that increasingly prioritizes political expediency over religious fidelity. The article ultimately calls for a reevaluation of the American Christian stance towards Israel and the implications it has for global Christian communities.

link

The above is a summary of a longer article supplied by the site posting the article. ABN

How ‘Israelism’ Has Replaced Christianity as the American Civic Religion — Ron Unz

The recent article presents a thought-provoking comparison of the ideological shifts in the United States and Russia, exploring how the two nations, once defined by their stark opposing ideologies during the Cold War, have now transitioned into unexpected roles. The author highlights that while the U.S. retains a predominantly Christian heritage, this identity has been largely stripped from its public and political life, resembling the Soviet era’s suppression of religion. In stark contrast, modern Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, has embraced Christianity as a cornerstone of its national identity, marking a significant ideological shift from its communist past. This paradox raises questions about the true nature of American identity and its relationship with Christianity.

The article also delves into the historical context of Russia’s religious landscape, particularly during the Bolshevik Revolution, which violently suppressed Christianity, leading to the near extinction of the Russian Orthodox Church. The author notes that despite the ideological battle against communism, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were both predominantly Christian nations, albeit with one under communist oppression. This historical reflection serves to underscore the irony of America’s current situation—although it has a Christian majority, the prevailing political atmosphere actively works against the expression of that identity in public life.

The piece further examines the role of American Christian leaders and the disconnect between their support for Israel and the struggles faced by Christian communities in the Middle East. The author criticizes the growing phenomenon of Christian Zionism, a belief system that prioritizes support for Israel often at the expense of Christian communities suffering under Israeli governance. Interviews conducted by Tucker Carlson with various Christian leaders and activists have revealed the troubling dynamics at play, where American Christians remain largely unaware of the persecution faced by their counterparts in the Holy Land due to a prevailing narrative that champions Israel unconditionally.

As the article concludes, it emphasizes the growing conflict between American Christian values and the political ideologies that dominate contemporary discourse, especially regarding Israel and its treatment of Christian communities in the Middle East. The author posits that the shift towards “Israelism” as a quasi-religious doctrine has replaced traditional Christian values in American politics, leading to a troubling disregard for Christian suffering abroad. This situation presents a significant challenge to the identity of American Christianity, as it grapples with its role within a society that increasingly prioritizes political expediency over religious fidelity. The article ultimately calls for a reevaluation of the American Christian stance towards Israel and the implications it has for global Christian communities.

link

The above is a summary of a longer article supplied by the site posting the article. ABN

How ‘Israelism’ Has Replaced Christianity as the American Civic Religion — Ron Unz

The recent article presents a thought-provoking comparison of the ideological shifts in the United States and Russia, exploring how the two nations, once defined by their stark opposing ideologies during the Cold War, have now transitioned into unexpected roles. The author highlights that while the U.S. retains a predominantly Christian heritage, this identity has been largely stripped from its public and political life, resembling the Soviet era’s suppression of religion. In stark contrast, modern Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, has embraced Christianity as a cornerstone of its national identity, marking a significant ideological shift from its communist past. This paradox raises questions about the true nature of American identity and its relationship with Christianity.

The article also delves into the historical context of Russia’s religious landscape, particularly during the Bolshevik Revolution, which violently suppressed Christianity, leading to the near extinction of the Russian Orthodox Church. The author notes that despite the ideological battle against communism, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were both predominantly Christian nations, albeit with one under communist oppression. This historical reflection serves to underscore the irony of America’s current situation—although it has a Christian majority, the prevailing political atmosphere actively works against the expression of that identity in public life.

The piece further examines the role of American Christian leaders and the disconnect between their support for Israel and the struggles faced by Christian communities in the Middle East. The author criticizes the growing phenomenon of Christian Zionism, a belief system that prioritizes support for Israel often at the expense of Christian communities suffering under Israeli governance. Interviews conducted by Tucker Carlson with various Christian leaders and activists have revealed the troubling dynamics at play, where American Christians remain largely unaware of the persecution faced by their counterparts in the Holy Land due to a prevailing narrative that champions Israel unconditionally.

As the article concludes, it emphasizes the growing conflict between American Christian values and the political ideologies that dominate contemporary discourse, especially regarding Israel and its treatment of Christian communities in the Middle East. The author posits that the shift towards “Israelism” as a quasi-religious doctrine has replaced traditional Christian values in American politics, leading to a troubling disregard for Christian suffering abroad. This situation presents a significant challenge to the identity of American Christianity, as it grapples with its role within a society that increasingly prioritizes political expediency over religious fidelity. The article ultimately calls for a reevaluation of the American Christian stance towards Israel and the implications it has for global Christian communities.

link

The above is a summary of a longer article supplied by the site posting the article. ABN

How ‘Israelism’ Has Replaced Christianity as the American Civic Religion — Ron Unz

The recent article presents a thought-provoking comparison of the ideological shifts in the United States and Russia, exploring how the two nations, once defined by their stark opposing ideologies during the Cold War, have now transitioned into unexpected roles. The author highlights that while the U.S. retains a predominantly Christian heritage, this identity has been largely stripped from its public and political life, resembling the Soviet era’s suppression of religion. In stark contrast, modern Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, has embraced Christianity as a cornerstone of its national identity, marking a significant ideological shift from its communist past. This paradox raises questions about the true nature of American identity and its relationship with Christianity.

The article also delves into the historical context of Russia’s religious landscape, particularly during the Bolshevik Revolution, which violently suppressed Christianity, leading to the near extinction of the Russian Orthodox Church. The author notes that despite the ideological battle against communism, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were both predominantly Christian nations, albeit with one under communist oppression. This historical reflection serves to underscore the irony of America’s current situation—although it has a Christian majority, the prevailing political atmosphere actively works against the expression of that identity in public life.

The piece further examines the role of American Christian leaders and the disconnect between their support for Israel and the struggles faced by Christian communities in the Middle East. The author criticizes the growing phenomenon of Christian Zionism, a belief system that prioritizes support for Israel often at the expense of Christian communities suffering under Israeli governance. Interviews conducted by Tucker Carlson with various Christian leaders and activists have revealed the troubling dynamics at play, where American Christians remain largely unaware of the persecution faced by their counterparts in the Holy Land due to a prevailing narrative that champions Israel unconditionally.

As the article concludes, it emphasizes the growing conflict between American Christian values and the political ideologies that dominate contemporary discourse, especially regarding Israel and its treatment of Christian communities in the Middle East. The author posits that the shift towards “Israelism” as a quasi-religious doctrine has replaced traditional Christian values in American politics, leading to a troubling disregard for Christian suffering abroad. This situation presents a significant challenge to the identity of American Christianity, as it grapples with its role within a society that increasingly prioritizes political expediency over religious fidelity. The article ultimately calls for a reevaluation of the American Christian stance towards Israel and the implications it has for global Christian communities.

link

The above is a summary of a longer article supplied by the site posting the article. ABN

The three men accused of raping and dumping LSU cheerleader Madison Brooks launch last-ditch bids ahead of next week’s trial… after trying to ban family from wearing PINK in court

link

The three men accused of raping and dumping LSU cheerleader Madison Brooks launch last-ditch bids ahead of next week’s trial… after trying to ban family from wearing PINK in court

link

‘For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep’

‘For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep’

‘For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep’

‘For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep’

‘For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must weep’

What Caused the Post-WW2 Decline of Urban America? Part 2 – Dropping the Hammer

The Shelley’s home in St. Louis was ground zero for the 1948 ruling that struck down neighborhood Freedom of Association. That year, a weaponized Supreme Court invented a “right” of forced entry that a more sober and diverse Supreme Court had unanimously rejected in 1926. Urban chaos exploded when the Court got it wrong.

As detailed in Part 1, dozens of major U.S. cities experienced a cooling of growth in the 1930s and then suffered huge losses after WW2, reversing over a century of previous expansion and prosperity. Two big factors in that decline were the unprecedented federal assaults on the historical work/save/invest ethic via nationalizing home mortgages (instant bank credit) in the 1930s and the 1935 nationalization of unions triggering the downfall of urban manufacturing that froze millions of middle-class jobs.

A third and more devastating federal action was inventing the “right” of forced entry by blacks (or anyone else) into previously peaceful English, German, Irish, Polish, Italian and other diverse ethnic communities. This final act of reckless social engineering permanently chased away millions of established urban residents and replaced them with a new class of predominantly poor, rural, uneducated people who often had little or no experience with the rigors of owning and maintaining property.

The federal imposition that chased people out of stable urban communities was the Supreme Court’s 1948 Shelley vs. Kraemer decision that abolished Freedom of Association in American neighborhoods.

This radical decision reversed the 1926 Corrigan vs. Buckley ruling that had unanimously protected those community rights in a very similar case. Unfortunately, both rulings have been largely forgotten in today’s climate of extreme aversion to anything branded “racism.” That reflexive avoidance has left enormous gaps in the public record.

link

How freedom of association died. Freedom of association is arguably one of our most important rights. Work where you want, employ who want, liver where you want — all based on who you want to associate with. ABN

What Caused the Post-WW2 Decline of Urban America? Part 2 – Dropping the Hammer

The Shelley’s home in St. Louis was ground zero for the 1948 ruling that struck down neighborhood Freedom of Association. That year, a weaponized Supreme Court invented a “right” of forced entry that a more sober and diverse Supreme Court had unanimously rejected in 1926. Urban chaos exploded when the Court got it wrong.

As detailed in Part 1, dozens of major U.S. cities experienced a cooling of growth in the 1930s and then suffered huge losses after WW2, reversing over a century of previous expansion and prosperity. Two big factors in that decline were the unprecedented federal assaults on the historical work/save/invest ethic via nationalizing home mortgages (instant bank credit) in the 1930s and the 1935 nationalization of unions triggering the downfall of urban manufacturing that froze millions of middle-class jobs.

A third and more devastating federal action was inventing the “right” of forced entry by blacks (or anyone else) into previously peaceful English, German, Irish, Polish, Italian and other diverse ethnic communities. This final act of reckless social engineering permanently chased away millions of established urban residents and replaced them with a new class of predominantly poor, rural, uneducated people who often had little or no experience with the rigors of owning and maintaining property.

The federal imposition that chased people out of stable urban communities was the Supreme Court’s 1948 Shelley vs. Kraemer decision that abolished Freedom of Association in American neighborhoods.

This radical decision reversed the 1926 Corrigan vs. Buckley ruling that had unanimously protected those community rights in a very similar case. Unfortunately, both rulings have been largely forgotten in today’s climate of extreme aversion to anything branded “racism.” That reflexive avoidance has left enormous gaps in the public record.

link

How freedom of association died. Freedom of association is arguably one of our most important rights. Work where you want, employ who want, liver where you want — all based on who you want to associate with. ABN

What Caused the Post-WW2 Decline of Urban America? Part 2 – Dropping the Hammer

The Shelley’s home in St. Louis was ground zero for the 1948 ruling that struck down neighborhood Freedom of Association. That year, a weaponized Supreme Court invented a “right” of forced entry that a more sober and diverse Supreme Court had unanimously rejected in 1926. Urban chaos exploded when the Court got it wrong.

As detailed in Part 1, dozens of major U.S. cities experienced a cooling of growth in the 1930s and then suffered huge losses after WW2, reversing over a century of previous expansion and prosperity. Two big factors in that decline were the unprecedented federal assaults on the historical work/save/invest ethic via nationalizing home mortgages (instant bank credit) in the 1930s and the 1935 nationalization of unions triggering the downfall of urban manufacturing that froze millions of middle-class jobs.

A third and more devastating federal action was inventing the “right” of forced entry by blacks (or anyone else) into previously peaceful English, German, Irish, Polish, Italian and other diverse ethnic communities. This final act of reckless social engineering permanently chased away millions of established urban residents and replaced them with a new class of predominantly poor, rural, uneducated people who often had little or no experience with the rigors of owning and maintaining property.

The federal imposition that chased people out of stable urban communities was the Supreme Court’s 1948 Shelley vs. Kraemer decision that abolished Freedom of Association in American neighborhoods.

This radical decision reversed the 1926 Corrigan vs. Buckley ruling that had unanimously protected those community rights in a very similar case. Unfortunately, both rulings have been largely forgotten in today’s climate of extreme aversion to anything branded “racism.” That reflexive avoidance has left enormous gaps in the public record.

link

How freedom of association died. Freedom of association is arguably one of our most important rights. Work where you want, employ who want, live where you want — all based on who you want to associate with. ABN

What Caused the Post-WW2 Decline of Urban America? Part 2 – Dropping the Hammer

The Shelley’s home in St. Louis was ground zero for the 1948 ruling that struck down neighborhood Freedom of Association. That year, a weaponized Supreme Court invented a “right” of forced entry that a more sober and diverse Supreme Court had unanimously rejected in 1926. Urban chaos exploded when the Court got it wrong.

As detailed in Part 1, dozens of major U.S. cities experienced a cooling of growth in the 1930s and then suffered huge losses after WW2, reversing over a century of previous expansion and prosperity. Two big factors in that decline were the unprecedented federal assaults on the historical work/save/invest ethic via nationalizing home mortgages (instant bank credit) in the 1930s and the 1935 nationalization of unions triggering the downfall of urban manufacturing that froze millions of middle-class jobs.

A third and more devastating federal action was inventing the “right” of forced entry by blacks (or anyone else) into previously peaceful English, German, Irish, Polish, Italian and other diverse ethnic communities. This final act of reckless social engineering permanently chased away millions of established urban residents and replaced them with a new class of predominantly poor, rural, uneducated people who often had little or no experience with the rigors of owning and maintaining property.

The federal imposition that chased people out of stable urban communities was the Supreme Court’s 1948 Shelley vs. Kraemer decision that abolished Freedom of Association in American neighborhoods.

This radical decision reversed the 1926 Corrigan vs. Buckley ruling that had unanimously protected those community rights in a very similar case. Unfortunately, both rulings have been largely forgotten in today’s climate of extreme aversion to anything branded “racism.” That reflexive avoidance has left enormous gaps in the public record.

link

How freedom of association died. Freedom of association is arguably one of our most important rights. Work where you want, employ who want, liver where you want — all based on who you want to associate with. ABN

What Caused the Post-WW2 Decline of Urban America? Part 2 – Dropping the Hammer

The Shelley’s home in St. Louis was ground zero for the 1948 ruling that struck down neighborhood Freedom of Association. That year, a weaponized Supreme Court invented a “right” of forced entry that a more sober and diverse Supreme Court had unanimously rejected in 1926. Urban chaos exploded when the Court got it wrong.

As detailed in Part 1, dozens of major U.S. cities experienced a cooling of growth in the 1930s and then suffered huge losses after WW2, reversing over a century of previous expansion and prosperity. Two big factors in that decline were the unprecedented federal assaults on the historical work/save/invest ethic via nationalizing home mortgages (instant bank credit) in the 1930s and the 1935 nationalization of unions triggering the downfall of urban manufacturing that froze millions of middle-class jobs.

A third and more devastating federal action was inventing the “right” of forced entry by blacks (or anyone else) into previously peaceful English, German, Irish, Polish, Italian and other diverse ethnic communities. This final act of reckless social engineering permanently chased away millions of established urban residents and replaced them with a new class of predominantly poor, rural, uneducated people who often had little or no experience with the rigors of owning and maintaining property.

The federal imposition that chased people out of stable urban communities was the Supreme Court’s 1948 Shelley vs. Kraemer decision that abolished Freedom of Association in American neighborhoods.

This radical decision reversed the 1926 Corrigan vs. Buckley ruling that had unanimously protected those community rights in a very similar case. Unfortunately, both rulings have been largely forgotten in today’s climate of extreme aversion to anything branded “racism.” That reflexive avoidance has left enormous gaps in the public record.

link

How freedom of association died. Freedom of association is arguably one of our most important rights. Work where you want, employ who want, liver where you want — all based on who you want to associate with. ABN

Inversion: ECDO Theory | Roger Cunningham (Ethical Skeptic) | Uncommon Living 61

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pqcJacg-aw

Inversion: ECDO Theory | Roger Cunningham (Ethical Skeptic) | Uncommon Living 61

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pqcJacg-aw

Inversion: ECDO Theory | Roger Cunningham (Ethical Skeptic) | Uncommon Living 61

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pqcJacg-aw

Inversion: ECDO Theory | Roger Cunningham (Ethical Skeptic) | Uncommon Living 61

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pqcJacg-aw

Inversion: ECDO Theory | Roger Cunningham (Ethical Skeptic) | Uncommon Living 61

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pqcJacg-aw

Days before the Moroccan invasion of Ceuta, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi threatened Spain:

“I have news for all the antisemites, Spanish Nazis: very soon the Arabs will massacre all of you. Not a single Spaniard capable of continuing to live in Spain will remain.”

And he warns, the same will happen in all European countries.

link

Days before the Moroccan invasion of Ceuta, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi threatened Spain:

“I have news for all the antisemites, Spanish Nazis: very soon the Arabs will massacre all of you. Not a single Spaniard capable of continuing to live in Spain will remain.”

And he warns, the same will happen in all European countries.

link

Days before the Moroccan invasion of Ceuta, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi threatened Spain:

“I have news for all the antisemites, Spanish Nazis: very soon the Arabs will massacre all of you. Not a single Spaniard capable of continuing to live in Spain will remain.”

And he warns, the same will happen in all European countries.

link

Days before the Moroccan invasion of Ceuta, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi threatened Spain:

“I have news for all the antisemites, Spanish Nazis: very soon the Arabs will massacre all of you. Not a single Spaniard capable of continuing to live in Spain will remain.”

And he warns, the same will happen in all European countries.

link

Days before the Moroccan invasion of Ceuta, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi threatened Spain:

“I have news for all the antisemites, Spanish Nazis: very soon the Arabs will massacre all of you. Not a single Spaniard capable of continuing to live in Spain will remain.”

And he warns, the same will happen in all European countries.

link

The Judeo-Christian Illusion

How the Roman Empire Transformed the Jesus Movement into an Imperial Religion

In my previous article, “The Forgotten Divide Between the Original Jesus Movement and the Modern Church,” I argued that the simple spiritual movement associated with Jesus of Nazareth gradually evolved into a powerful religious institution. I suggested that the earliest communities of believers were centred on devotion to God, personal transformation, and the fellowship of ordinary believers, whereas later centuries witnessed the emergence of increasingly centralised ecclesiastical structures, doctrinal councils, and institutional authority. I also examined the historical development of the New Testament canon, the diversity of early Christian traditions, the significance of the Greek word ekklesia, and the question of whether Jesus himself ever intended to establish the kind of hierarchical institution that later came to dominate Christendom.

But an even deeper question remains. If the original movement was transformed, what exactly was it transformed into? How did a movement centred on inner spiritual awakening become a religion increasingly associated with institutional authority, sacramental systems, imperial power, and theological doctrines that many historians agree developed only gradually over the centuries?

This article traces that transformation from the earliest Jesus movement through the influence of Paul, the development of sacrificial theology, key doctrines and contested translations, the emergence of ecclesiastical authority, the concept of “Judeo-Christianity,” and the Roman Empire’s adoption and transformation of Christianity. Together, these developments gave rise to the dominant form of Christianity that spread throughout the Roman world and, later, much of the modern world.

Throughout this article I distinguish between the historical question of whether Jesus existed and the separate question of whether the earliest teachings associated with his name differ from the institutional religion that later developed. The latter question remains important regardless of where one stands on the historicity debate.

link

I have not read this yet but plan to. The intro is well-done and this is an interesting topic. ABN

The Judeo-Christian Illusion

How the Roman Empire Transformed the Jesus Movement into an Imperial Religion

In my previous article, “The Forgotten Divide Between the Original Jesus Movement and the Modern Church,” I argued that the simple spiritual movement associated with Jesus of Nazareth gradually evolved into a powerful religious institution. I suggested that the earliest communities of believers were centred on devotion to God, personal transformation, and the fellowship of ordinary believers, whereas later centuries witnessed the emergence of increasingly centralised ecclesiastical structures, doctrinal councils, and institutional authority. I also examined the historical development of the New Testament canon, the diversity of early Christian traditions, the significance of the Greek word ekklesia, and the question of whether Jesus himself ever intended to establish the kind of hierarchical institution that later came to dominate Christendom.

But an even deeper question remains. If the original movement was transformed, what exactly was it transformed into? How did a movement centred on inner spiritual awakening become a religion increasingly associated with institutional authority, sacramental systems, imperial power, and theological doctrines that many historians agree developed only gradually over the centuries?

This article traces that transformation from the earliest Jesus movement through the influence of Paul, the development of sacrificial theology, key doctrines and contested translations, the emergence of ecclesiastical authority, the concept of “Judeo-Christianity,” and the Roman Empire’s adoption and transformation of Christianity. Together, these developments gave rise to the dominant form of Christianity that spread throughout the Roman world and, later, much of the modern world.

Throughout this article I distinguish between the historical question of whether Jesus existed and the separate question of whether the earliest teachings associated with his name differ from the institutional religion that later developed. The latter question remains important regardless of where one stands on the historicity debate.

link

I have not read this yet but plan to. The intro is well-done and this is an interesting topic. ABN

The Judeo-Christian Illusion

How the Roman Empire Transformed the Jesus Movement into an Imperial Religion

In my previous article, “The Forgotten Divide Between the Original Jesus Movement and the Modern Church,” I argued that the simple spiritual movement associated with Jesus of Nazareth gradually evolved into a powerful religious institution. I suggested that the earliest communities of believers were centred on devotion to God, personal transformation, and the fellowship of ordinary believers, whereas later centuries witnessed the emergence of increasingly centralised ecclesiastical structures, doctrinal councils, and institutional authority. I also examined the historical development of the New Testament canon, the diversity of early Christian traditions, the significance of the Greek word ekklesia, and the question of whether Jesus himself ever intended to establish the kind of hierarchical institution that later came to dominate Christendom.

But an even deeper question remains. If the original movement was transformed, what exactly was it transformed into? How did a movement centred on inner spiritual awakening become a religion increasingly associated with institutional authority, sacramental systems, imperial power, and theological doctrines that many historians agree developed only gradually over the centuries?

This article traces that transformation from the earliest Jesus movement through the influence of Paul, the development of sacrificial theology, key doctrines and contested translations, the emergence of ecclesiastical authority, the concept of “Judeo-Christianity,” and the Roman Empire’s adoption and transformation of Christianity. Together, these developments gave rise to the dominant form of Christianity that spread throughout the Roman world and, later, much of the modern world.

Throughout this article I distinguish between the historical question of whether Jesus existed and the separate question of whether the earliest teachings associated with his name differ from the institutional religion that later developed. The latter question remains important regardless of where one stands on the historicity debate.

link

I have not read this yet but plan to. The intro is well-done and this is an interesting topic. ABN

The Judeo-Christian Illusion

How the Roman Empire Transformed the Jesus Movement into an Imperial Religion

In my previous article, “The Forgotten Divide Between the Original Jesus Movement and the Modern Church,” I argued that the simple spiritual movement associated with Jesus of Nazareth gradually evolved into a powerful religious institution. I suggested that the earliest communities of believers were centred on devotion to God, personal transformation, and the fellowship of ordinary believers, whereas later centuries witnessed the emergence of increasingly centralised ecclesiastical structures, doctrinal councils, and institutional authority. I also examined the historical development of the New Testament canon, the diversity of early Christian traditions, the significance of the Greek word ekklesia, and the question of whether Jesus himself ever intended to establish the kind of hierarchical institution that later came to dominate Christendom.

But an even deeper question remains. If the original movement was transformed, what exactly was it transformed into? How did a movement centred on inner spiritual awakening become a religion increasingly associated with institutional authority, sacramental systems, imperial power, and theological doctrines that many historians agree developed only gradually over the centuries?

This article traces that transformation from the earliest Jesus movement through the influence of Paul, the development of sacrificial theology, key doctrines and contested translations, the emergence of ecclesiastical authority, the concept of “Judeo-Christianity,” and the Roman Empire’s adoption and transformation of Christianity. Together, these developments gave rise to the dominant form of Christianity that spread throughout the Roman world and, later, much of the modern world.

Throughout this article I distinguish between the historical question of whether Jesus existed and the separate question of whether the earliest teachings associated with his name differ from the institutional religion that later developed. The latter question remains important regardless of where one stands on the historicity debate.

link

I have not read this yet but plan to. The intro is well-done and this is an interesting topic. ABN

The Judeo-Christian Illusion

How the Roman Empire Transformed the Jesus Movement into an Imperial Religion

In my previous article, “The Forgotten Divide Between the Original Jesus Movement and the Modern Church,” I argued that the simple spiritual movement associated with Jesus of Nazareth gradually evolved into a powerful religious institution. I suggested that the earliest communities of believers were centred on devotion to God, personal transformation, and the fellowship of ordinary believers, whereas later centuries witnessed the emergence of increasingly centralised ecclesiastical structures, doctrinal councils, and institutional authority. I also examined the historical development of the New Testament canon, the diversity of early Christian traditions, the significance of the Greek word ekklesia, and the question of whether Jesus himself ever intended to establish the kind of hierarchical institution that later came to dominate Christendom.

But an even deeper question remains. If the original movement was transformed, what exactly was it transformed into? How did a movement centred on inner spiritual awakening become a religion increasingly associated with institutional authority, sacramental systems, imperial power, and theological doctrines that many historians agree developed only gradually over the centuries?

This article traces that transformation from the earliest Jesus movement through the influence of Paul, the development of sacrificial theology, key doctrines and contested translations, the emergence of ecclesiastical authority, the concept of “Judeo-Christianity,” and the Roman Empire’s adoption and transformation of Christianity. Together, these developments gave rise to the dominant form of Christianity that spread throughout the Roman world and, later, much of the modern world.

Throughout this article I distinguish between the historical question of whether Jesus existed and the separate question of whether the earliest teachings associated with his name differ from the institutional religion that later developed. The latter question remains important regardless of where one stands on the historicity debate.

link

I have not read this yet but plan to. The intro is well-done and this is an interesting topic. ABN

COVID-19 VAX: This is the most evil thing that’s ever happened in the United States — Mary Talley Bowden MD

Communist @tiktok_us refuses to let me post this reel of my interview with @TuckerCarlson on my account….

They’ll let Tucker post it – 1.4 million views- but I’m not allowed?

link

Carlson actually says the quote in the headline but Bowden fully agrees. She has been very good all along and deserves our respect and support. At great cost to herself, she spoke and still speaks the truth about covid, covid masks, and most of all, the covid vax. People like her have innate bravery and love of truth. From a Buddhist POV, that’s morally and spiritually exemplary. That’s what life is all about. ABN

COVID-19 VAX: This is the most evil thing that’s ever happened in the United States — Mary Talley Bowden MD

Communist @tiktok_us refuses to let me post this reel of my interview with @TuckerCarlson on my account….

They’ll let Tucker post it – 1.4 million views- but I’m not allowed?

link

Carlson actually says the quote in the headline but Bowden fully agrees. She has been very good all along and deserves our respect and support. At great cost to herself, she spoke and still speaks the truth about covid, covid masks, and most of all, the covid vax. People like her have innate bravery and love of truth. From a Buddhist POV, that’s morally and spiritually exemplary. That’s what life is all about. ABN

COVID-19 VAX: This is the most evil thing that’s ever happened in the United States — Mary Talley Bowden MD

Communist @tiktok_us refuses to let me post this reel of my interview with @TuckerCarlson on my account….

They’ll let Tucker post it – 1.4 million views- but I’m not allowed?

link

Carlson actually says the quote in the headline but Bowden fully agrees. She has been very good all along and deserves our respect and support. At great cost to herself, she spoke and still speaks the truth about covid, covid masks, and most of all, the covid vax. People like her have innate bravery and love of truth. From a Buddhist POV, that’s morally and spiritually exemplary. That’s what life is all about. ABN

COVID-19 VAX: This is the most evil thing that’s ever happened in the United States — Mary Talley Bowden MD

Communist @tiktok_us refuses to let me post this reel of my interview with @TuckerCarlson on my account….

They’ll let Tucker post it – 1.4 million views- but I’m not allowed?

link

Carlson actually says the quote in the headline but Bowden fully agrees. She has been very good all along and deserves our respect and support. At great cost to herself, she spoke and still speaks the truth about covid, covid masks, and most of all, the covid vax. People like her have innate bravery and love of truth. From a Buddhist POV, that’s morally and spiritually exemplary. That’s what life is all about. ABN

COVID-19 VAX: This is the most evil thing that’s ever happened in the United States — Mary Talley Bowden MD

Communist @tiktok_us refuses to let me post this reel of my interview with @TuckerCarlson on my account….

They’ll let Tucker post it – 1.4 million views- but I’m not allowed?

link

Carlson actually says the quote in the headline but Bowden fully agrees. She has been very good all along and deserves our respect and support. At great cost to herself, she spoke and still speaks the truth about covid, covid masks, and most of all, the covid vax. People like her have innate bravery and love of truth. From a Buddhist POV, that’s morally and spiritually exemplary. That’s what life is all about. ABN

Viking/Norsemen explorations, on their own, surpass the explorations of non-Europeans, including the much touted voyages of Zheng between 1405 and 1433 to Southeast Asia, India, and the Horn of Africa — Ricardo Duchesne

Zheng He did not navigate one single unknown nautical mile. Yes, his ships were impressively large, but he merely visited places, established diplomatic relations, and exchanged exotic goods. He was an eunuch.

Ibn Battuta, likewise, was not an explorer, but a traveler who visited, from 1325 to 1354, the known world of North Africa, the Middle East, East Africa, Central and South Asia, the Iberian Peninsula, and West Africa.

In stark contrast, the Vikings, between the eighth and eleventh centuries:

i) established settlements in large areas of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France;

ii) stormed eastwards through the Baltic down into the Black Sea and imposed a ruling dynasty in Kiev from which the name “Russia” derives;

iii) created Normandy from which point William the Conqueror took over the whole of England after the famous Battle of Hastings (1066);

iv) created the Kingdom of Sicily that lasted hundreds of years.

v) They also discovered Iceland, not accidentally, since this land had been described before, though never explored, as “Thule” in various writings, creating a nation with about 30,000 by 930.

vi) And they discovered and colonized Greenland, 200 miles away, starting in 978, followed by a well-planned expedition of 25 ships and several hundred prospective settlers.

vii) And, amazingly, they discovered and established a colony in America 5 centuries before Columbus, which they called “Vinland”. It was at first a chance sighting by Bjarni Herjolfsson, soon followed by planned exploration led by Eirik the Red, and then planned settlement by Thorfinn Karlsefni.

Now, it needs to be added, as contemporary historians of the Vikings have explained, that Icelandic geographers of the early Middle Ages “showed an astonishing sophistication in their image of the northern world”.

We have a manuscript dating from about 1300, Geographical Treatise, compiling this knowledge, “based on the actual experience of Icelandic sailors”. There is another Book of Settlement which describes the settlement of Iceland 870 to 930.

The Viking/Norsemen/Icelandic peoples also wrote, between 1220 and 1280, two fascinating sagas of their explorations of Iceland, Greenland, and Vinland: The Saga of the Greenlanders, and The Saga of Erik the Red.

These are stories of the events and of the major characters associated with the explorations and settlements occurring around 970-1030.

These men were farmers-sailors-warriors, and aristocratic in temperament, by which I mean they had an indomitable will and pride as free men.

This explains why the type of government they created in Iceland was republican (a combination of aristocratic/democratic rule) as were the governments created everywhere by Europeans.

Know your history. They are erasing it as we speak. The academics in charge of our universities, many of whom are increasingly nonwhite, are consciously falsifying this history, spitting on it. Don’t let them trash your dear ancestors!

link

Viking/Norsemen explorations, on their own, surpass the explorations of non-Europeans, including the much touted voyages of Zheng between 1405 and 1433 to Southeast Asia, India, and the Horn of Africa — Ricardo Duchesne

Zheng He did not navigate one single unknown nautical mile. Yes, his ships were impressively large, but he merely visited places, established diplomatic relations, and exchanged exotic goods. He was an eunuch.

Ibn Battuta, likewise, was not an explorer, but a traveler who visited, from 1325 to 1354, the known world of North Africa, the Middle East, East Africa, Central and South Asia, the Iberian Peninsula, and West Africa.

In stark contrast, the Vikings, between the eighth and eleventh centuries:

i) established settlements in large areas of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France;

ii) stormed eastwards through the Baltic down into the Black Sea and imposed a ruling dynasty in Kiev from which the name “Russia” derives;

iii) created Normandy from which point William the Conqueror took over the whole of England after the famous Battle of Hastings (1066);

iv) created the Kingdom of Sicily that lasted hundreds of years.

v) They also discovered Iceland, not accidentally, since this land had been described before, though never explored, as “Thule” in various writings, creating a nation with about 30,000 by 930.

vi) And they discovered and colonized Greenland, 200 miles away, starting in 978, followed by a well-planned expedition of 25 ships and several hundred prospective settlers.

vii) And, amazingly, they discovered and established a colony in America 5 centuries before Columbus, which they called “Vinland”. It was at first a chance sighting by Bjarni Herjolfsson, soon followed by planned exploration led by Eirik the Red, and then planned settlement by Thorfinn Karlsefni.

Now, it needs to be added, as contemporary historians of the Vikings have explained, that Icelandic geographers of the early Middle Ages “showed an astonishing sophistication in their image of the northern world”.

We have a manuscript dating from about 1300, Geographical Treatise, compiling this knowledge, “based on the actual experience of Icelandic sailors”. There is another Book of Settlement which describes the settlement of Iceland 870 to 930.

The Viking/Norsemen/Icelandic peoples also wrote, between 1220 and 1280, two fascinating sagas of their explorations of Iceland, Greenland, and Vinland: The Saga of the Greenlanders, and The Saga of Erik the Red.

These are stories of the events and of the major characters associated with the explorations and settlements occurring around 970-1030.

These men were farmers-sailors-warriors, and aristocratic in temperament, by which I mean they had an indomitable will and pride as free men.

This explains why the type of government they created in Iceland was republican (a combination of aristocratic/democratic rule) as were the governments created everywhere by Europeans.

Know your history. They are erasing it as we speak. The academics in charge of our universities, many of whom are increasingly nonwhite, are consciously falsifying this history, spitting on it. Don’t let them trash your dear ancestors!

link

Viking/Norsemen explorations, on their own, surpass the explorations of non-Europeans, including the much touted voyages of Zheng between 1405 and 1433 to Southeast Asia, India, and the Horn of Africa — Ricardo Duchesne

Zheng He did not navigate one single unknown nautical mile. Yes, his ships were impressively large, but he merely visited places, established diplomatic relations, and exchanged exotic goods. He was an eunuch.

Ibn Battuta, likewise, was not an explorer, but a traveler who visited, from 1325 to 1354, the known world of North Africa, the Middle East, East Africa, Central and South Asia, the Iberian Peninsula, and West Africa.

In stark contrast, the Vikings, between the eighth and eleventh centuries:

i) established settlements in large areas of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France;

ii) stormed eastwards through the Baltic down into the Black Sea and imposed a ruling dynasty in Kiev from which the name “Russia” derives;

iii) created Normandy from which point William the Conqueror took over the whole of England after the famous Battle of Hastings (1066);

iv) created the Kingdom of Sicily that lasted hundreds of years.

v) They also discovered Iceland, not accidentally, since this land had been described before, though never explored, as “Thule” in various writings, creating a nation with about 30,000 by 930.

vi) And they discovered and colonized Greenland, 200 miles away, starting in 978, followed by a well-planned expedition of 25 ships and several hundred prospective settlers.

vii) And, amazingly, they discovered and established a colony in America 5 centuries before Columbus, which they called “Vinland”. It was at first a chance sighting by Bjarni Herjolfsson, soon followed by planned exploration led by Eirik the Red, and then planned settlement by Thorfinn Karlsefni.

Now, it needs to be added, as contemporary historians of the Vikings have explained, that Icelandic geographers of the early Middle Ages “showed an astonishing sophistication in their image of the northern world”.

We have a manuscript dating from about 1300, Geographical Treatise, compiling this knowledge, “based on the actual experience of Icelandic sailors”. There is another Book of Settlement which describes the settlement of Iceland 870 to 930.

The Viking/Norsemen/Icelandic peoples also wrote, between 1220 and 1280, two fascinating sagas of their explorations of Iceland, Greenland, and Vinland: The Saga of the Greenlanders, and The Saga of Erik the Red.

These are stories of the events and of the major characters associated with the explorations and settlements occurring around 970-1030.

These men were farmers-sailors-warriors, and aristocratic in temperament, by which I mean they had an indomitable will and pride as free men.

This explains why the type of government they created in Iceland was republican (a combination of aristocratic/democratic rule) as were the governments created everywhere by Europeans.

Know your history. They are erasing it as we speak. The academics in charge of our universities, many of whom are increasingly nonwhite, are consciously falsifying this history, spitting on it. Don’t let them trash your dear ancestors!

link

Viking/Norsemen explorations, on their own, surpass the explorations of non-Europeans, including the much touted voyages of Zheng between 1405 and 1433 to Southeast Asia, India, and the Horn of Africa — Ricardo Duchesne

Zheng He did not navigate one single unknown nautical mile. Yes, his ships were impressively large, but he merely visited places, established diplomatic relations, and exchanged exotic goods. He was an eunuch.

Ibn Battuta, likewise, was not an explorer, but a traveler who visited, from 1325 to 1354, the known world of North Africa, the Middle East, East Africa, Central and South Asia, the Iberian Peninsula, and West Africa.

In stark contrast, the Vikings, between the eighth and eleventh centuries:

i) established settlements in large areas of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France;

ii) stormed eastwards through the Baltic down into the Black Sea and imposed a ruling dynasty in Kiev from which the name “Russia” derives;

iii) created Normandy from which point William the Conqueror took over the whole of England after the famous Battle of Hastings (1066);

iv) created the Kingdom of Sicily that lasted hundreds of years.

v) They also discovered Iceland, not accidentally, since this land had been described before, though never explored, as “Thule” in various writings, creating a nation with about 30,000 by 930.

vi) And they discovered and colonized Greenland, 200 miles away, starting in 978, followed by a well-planned expedition of 25 ships and several hundred prospective settlers.

vii) And, amazingly, they discovered and established a colony in America 5 centuries before Columbus, which they called “Vinland”. It was at first a chance sighting by Bjarni Herjolfsson, soon followed by planned exploration led by Eirik the Red, and then planned settlement by Thorfinn Karlsefni.

Now, it needs to be added, as contemporary historians of the Vikings have explained, that Icelandic geographers of the early Middle Ages “showed an astonishing sophistication in their image of the northern world”.

We have a manuscript dating from about 1300, Geographical Treatise, compiling this knowledge, “based on the actual experience of Icelandic sailors”. There is another Book of Settlement which describes the settlement of Iceland 870 to 930.

The Viking/Norsemen/Icelandic peoples also wrote, between 1220 and 1280, two fascinating sagas of their explorations of Iceland, Greenland, and Vinland: The Saga of the Greenlanders, and The Saga of Erik the Red.

These are stories of the events and of the major characters associated with the explorations and settlements occurring around 970-1030.

These men were farmers-sailors-warriors, and aristocratic in temperament, by which I mean they had an indomitable will and pride as free men.

This explains why the type of government they created in Iceland was republican (a combination of aristocratic/democratic rule) as were the governments created everywhere by Europeans.

Know your history. They are erasing it as we speak. The academics in charge of our universities, many of whom are increasingly nonwhite, are consciously falsifying this history, spitting on it. Don’t let them trash your dear ancestors!

link

Viking/Norsemen explorations, on their own, surpass the explorations of non-Europeans, including the much touted voyages of Zheng between 1405 and 1433 to Southeast Asia, India, and the Horn of Africa — Ricardo Duchesne

Zheng He did not navigate one single unknown nautical mile. Yes, his ships were impressively large, but he merely visited places, established diplomatic relations, and exchanged exotic goods. He was an eunuch.

Ibn Battuta, likewise, was not an explorer, but a traveler who visited, from 1325 to 1354, the known world of North Africa, the Middle East, East Africa, Central and South Asia, the Iberian Peninsula, and West Africa.

In stark contrast, the Vikings, between the eighth and eleventh centuries:

i) established settlements in large areas of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France;

ii) stormed eastwards through the Baltic down into the Black Sea and imposed a ruling dynasty in Kiev from which the name “Russia” derives;

iii) created Normandy from which point William the Conqueror took over the whole of England after the famous Battle of Hastings (1066);

iv) created the Kingdom of Sicily that lasted hundreds of years.

v) They also discovered Iceland, not accidentally, since this land had been described before, though never explored, as “Thule” in various writings, creating a nation with about 30,000 by 930.

vi) And they discovered and colonized Greenland, 200 miles away, starting in 978, followed by a well-planned expedition of 25 ships and several hundred prospective settlers.

vii) And, amazingly, they discovered and established a colony in America 5 centuries before Columbus, which they called “Vinland”. It was at first a chance sighting by Bjarni Herjolfsson, soon followed by planned exploration led by Eirik the Red, and then planned settlement by Thorfinn Karlsefni.

Now, it needs to be added, as contemporary historians of the Vikings have explained, that Icelandic geographers of the early Middle Ages “showed an astonishing sophistication in their image of the northern world”.

We have a manuscript dating from about 1300, Geographical Treatise, compiling this knowledge, “based on the actual experience of Icelandic sailors”. There is another Book of Settlement which describes the settlement of Iceland 870 to 930.

The Viking/Norsemen/Icelandic peoples also wrote, between 1220 and 1280, two fascinating sagas of their explorations of Iceland, Greenland, and Vinland: The Saga of the Greenlanders, and The Saga of Erik the Red.

These are stories of the events and of the major characters associated with the explorations and settlements occurring around 970-1030.

These men were farmers-sailors-warriors, and aristocratic in temperament, by which I mean they had an indomitable will and pride as free men.

This explains why the type of government they created in Iceland was republican (a combination of aristocratic/democratic rule) as were the governments created everywhere by Europeans.

Know your history. They are erasing it as we speak. The academics in charge of our universities, many of whom are increasingly nonwhite, are consciously falsifying this history, spitting on it. Don’t let them trash your dear ancestors!

link

This is the Pulitzer Prize winning photo that perfectly embodies our current state — Leonarda Jonie

The black woman, unlike Iryna, was perfectly safe surrounded by men of another race.

link

This is the Pulitzer Prize winning photo that perfectly embodies our current state — Leonarda Jonie

The black woman, unlike Iryna, was perfectly safe surrounded by men of another race.

link

This is the Pulitzer Prize winning photo that perfectly embodies our current state — Leonarda Jonie

The black woman, unlike Iryna, was perfectly safe surrounded by men of another race.

link

This is the Pulitzer Prize winning photo that perfectly embodies our current state — Leonarda Jonie

The black woman, unlike Iryna, was perfectly safe surrounded by men of another race.

link

This is the Pulitzer Prize winning photo that perfectly embodies our current state — Leonarda Jonie

The black woman, unlike Iryna, was perfectly safe surrounded by men of another race.

link

FRANCE: Louis, 17, beaten to death by a bunch of thugs who ambushed him

limk

One of those sons of bitches filmed the scene.

They’re proud of themselves. Killing one of ours is a trophy.

These anti-white hate operations are multiplying everywhere.

We’re not angry enough.

link

__________

The second video is gruesome but don’t look away. ABN

There is an iron invisible hand behind the curtain that does everything

There is an iron invisible hand behind the curtain that does everything