Search
1000 results for “Neil_Warner_”
-
What Neil Patrick Harris Watches (and Plays) With His Kids
Photo-Illustration: Vulture; Photos: Everett Collection (Warner Bros., Disney+), Jason Mendez/Getty Images, CBS, Nintendo, Courtesy of retailer, Meta, Toei…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #TV #Entertainment #familyentertainment #kidsmovies #kidstv #NeilPatrickHarris #qualitytime #vulturehomepagelede
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/369028/ -
What Neil Patrick Harris Watches (and Plays) With His Kids
Photo-Illustration: Vulture; Photos: Everett Collection (Warner Bros., Disney+), Jason Mendez/Getty Images, CBS, Nintendo, Courtesy of retailer, Meta, Toei…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #TV #Entertainment #familyentertainment #kidsmovies #kidstv #NeilPatrickHarris #qualitytime #vulturehomepagelede
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/369028/ -
What Neil Patrick Harris Watches (and Plays) With His Kids
Photo-Illustration: Vulture; Photos: Everett Collection (Warner Bros., Disney+), Jason Mendez/Getty Images, CBS, Nintendo, Courtesy of retailer, Meta, Toei…
#NewsBeep #News #TV #AU #Australia #Entertainment #familyentertainment #kidsmovies #kidstv #NeilPatrickHarris #qualitytime #vulturehomepagelede
https://www.newsbeep.com/au/370420/ -
The 1976 that saw Neil Young walk on on Stephen Stills
Credit: Far Out / Omroepvereniging VARA / Warner / Reprise Sat 16 May 2026 20:30, UK For a…
#NewsBeep #News #Music #1970s #1976 #AU #Australia #Entertainment #NeilYoung #StephenStills
https://www.newsbeep.com/au/676333/ -
The 1976 that saw Neil Young walk on on Stephen Stills
Credit: Far Out / Omroepvereniging VARA / Warner / Reprise Sat 16 May 2026 20:30, UK For a…
#NewsBeep #News #Music #1970s #1976 #AU #Australia #Entertainment #NeilYoung #StephenStills
https://www.newsbeep.com/au/676333/ -
The 1976 that saw Neil Young walk on on Stephen Stills
Credit: Far Out / Omroepvereniging VARA / Warner / Reprise Sat 16 May 2026 20:30, UK For a…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Music #1970s #1976 #Entertainment #NeilYoung #StephenStills
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/647467/ -
The 1976 that saw Neil Young walk on on Stephen Stills
Credit: Far Out / Omroepvereniging VARA / Warner / Reprise Sat 16 May 2026 20:30, UK For a…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Music #1970s #1976 #Entertainment #NeilYoung #StephenStills
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/647467/ -
What are you watching tonight?
.
July 21, 1990. Malcolm-Jamal Warner from NBC's The Cosby Show; David Faustino from Fox's Married...with Children; Neil Patrick Harris from ABC's Doogie Howser, M.D.; Alyssa Milano from ABC's Who's the Boss
.
#MalcolmJamalWarner #TheCosbyShow #DavidFaustino #MarriedwithChildren #NeilPatrickHarris #DoogieHowserMD #AlyssaMilano #WhostheBoss #television #tvshow #tv #tvguide #retro #vintage -
Wednesday Reads
Good Day!!
I spent the last 3 days reading books and relaxing, and mostly avoiding watching or reading news social media. My RA pain had been pretty bad lately, and it has definitely improved as a result. I’ll have to see what happens after I engage with the news for this post, but at the moment I plan to go back on a news diet when I finish. I definitely think my health is improved by avoiding news about Trump.
Here’s what’s happening this morning:
Cable news Legend Ted Turner has died.
The New York Times (gift article): Ted Turner, Creator of CNN and the 24-Hour News Cycle, Dies at 87.
The rest of the article is fascinating–dealing with Turner’s personal life, political beliefs and more. I’ve included a gift link in case you want to read more.Ted Turner, the media mogul who cut a brash and vivid figure on the American scene of the late 20th century by dominating the cable television industry, creating the 24-hour news cycle with CNN, and extending his restless reach into professional sports, environmentalism and philanthropy, died on Wednesday at his home near Tallahassee, Fla. He was 87.
Phillip Evans, a spokesman for the family, confirmed the death. Mr. Turner announced in 2018 that he had Lewy body dementia, a progressive brain disorder.
Ted Turner
Mr. Turner’s signature creation was CNN — the Cable News Network — which revolutionized television news in 1980 by presenting it all hours of the day and eventually inspiring other media operations to follow suit. But his portfolio of business ventures bulged with much more, and their impact on American culture was considerable.
As a spinoff of CNN, Mr. Turner created the channel CNN Headline News and CNN International. He founded the cable and satellite sports and entertainment “superstation” that became known as TBS and spawned a sister channel, TNT, both of which continue to reach millions of homes.
In 1985, he bought for $1.5 billion the MGM studio’s library of films and nine years later created the cable franchise Turner Classic Movies, or TCM. He made a similar purchase of Hanna-Barbera cartoons and, relying on them, created the Cartoon Network in 1992. And in 1996, he merged his conglomerate, Turner Broadcasting System, with Time Warner to create one of the world’s largest media companies.
Along the way, he found the time and energy to captain the winning yacht in the America’s Cup race in 1977 and to take an active role as owner of the Atlanta Braves, giving the team extended national exposure on Turner-owned television.
“I’m trying to set the all-time record for achievement by one person in one lifetime,” he told the journalist Dale Van Atta in a Reader’s Digest article in 1998. “And that puts you in pretty big company: Alexander the Great, Napoleon, Gandhi, Christ, Mohammed, Buddha, Washington, Roosevelt, Churchill.”
Not even his staunchest admirers placed Mr. Turner on that high a pedestal. But even a bitter rival like the media magnate Rupert Murdoch — who once had his New York Post run the headline “Is Turner Insane?” — had to concede that he was one of the most influential figures in the history of mass media.
An Atlanta-based entrepreneur, Mr. Turner took astounding risks in business, often teetering on the edge of bankruptcy and then roaring back to multiply his fortune.
Against the advice of colleagues and the conventional wisdom of his industry peers, he poured millions of dollars into pioneering ventures that combined cable and satellite broadcasts. He warred against the big television networks. He almost lost his shirt in Hollywood but emerged from these gambles and brawls as a billionaire astride a vast cable empire of news, sports and entertainment channels.
Of course the big story is still Trump’s war with Iran. It’s difficult to know what to believe about what’s going on, since Trump and Hegseth lie constantly.
CNN reports the Trump/Hegseth line: US and Iran closing in on memorandum aimed at ending war, source says.
The United States and Iran are moving closer to an agreement on a short memorandum to end the Iran war, a regional source familiar with the negotiations said, although Trump administration officials cautioned that talks had previously fallen apart at the last minute.
The White House received positive feedback from Pakistani mediators on Tuesday that the Iranians were progressing toward a compromise, two administration officials told CNN while offering some skepticism about Pakistan’s optimism.
From CentCom: Project Freedom at Strait of Hormuz
But a renewed diplomatic push has emerged in recent days, the regional source said. President Donald Trump appears to be simplifying issues in peace negotiations so moderates in the Iranian regime can come back to the negotiating table, the source added, with the aim being to tackle thornier issues later.
A one-page plan being floated internally contains provisions that have been at the heart of negotiations to end the conflict, a person familiar with the plan told CNN. The document would declare an end to the war while triggering a 30-day negotiation period on resolving sticking points, including on nuclear issues, unfreezing Iranian assets and future security in the Strait of Hormuz, the person said.
Precise details of the plan couldn’t immediately be verified, but the source familiar said it would include discussion of a moratorium on uranium enrichment for a period of longer than 10 years. A previous US proposal had set it at 20 years.
The plan also requires Iran to ship its stockpile of highly enriched uranium out of the country, but details were still being negotiated.
News of positive movement from the Pakistanis helped spur Trump on Tuesday to announce a pause of “Project Freedom” – an operation to guide stranded ships out of the strait – citing progress in negotiations with Iran, the administration officials said. The pause came after Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that Operation Epic Fury had ended and that the administration’s full focus was on Project Freedom.
The regional source told CNN that the harder the US pushed its agenda of Project Freedom and Operation Epic Fury, the more the hardliners in Iran stood up and had a bigger voice.
The Guardian reports on Iran’s reaction: Middle East crisis live: US proposal to end war a ‘wishlist, not a reality’, warns Iranian official.
‘American wishlist, not a reality’: Iranian officials cast doubt on US proposal to end war.
Ebrahim Rezaei, the spokesperson of the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission, has poured cold water on the Axios report claiming the US and Iran were nearing a one-page memorandum to end the war, saying it was an “American wishlist [and] not a reality”.
Ebrahim Rezaei
In a fiery statement on X, he said: “Americans will not gain in a lost war what they failed to achieve in face-to-face negotiations. Iran has its finger on the trigger and is ready; if they do not surrender and grant the necessary concessions, or if they or their lapdogs attempt any mischief, we will respond with a harsh and regrettable response.
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, also responded to the Axios report, telling the Iranian Isna news agency that the US proposal is still being reviewed by Tehran.
“Once Iran concludes its assessment, it will convey its views to the Pakistani side,” Isna reported, adding that the US demands detailed in the Axios report “included excessive and unrealistic demands that have been strongly rejected by Iranian officials in recent days”.
Isna reported that the Iranian negotiating team is solely reviewing the “termination of the war” and the nuclear issue is not currently being discussed.
That doesn’t sound like an agreement is coming soon. And Trump is issuing threats.
AP: US and Iran appear to move closer to ending their war as Trump threatens more bombing.
The United States and Iran appeared to be moving closer Wednesday to an initial agreement to end the war, as U.S. President Trump sought to pressure Tehran with threats of a new wave of bombing if a deal is not reached.
Trump posted on social media that the two-month war could soon end and that oil and natural gas shipments disrupted by the conflict could restart. But he said that depends on Iran accepting a reported agreement that the president did not detail.
“If they don’t agree, the bombing starts,” Trump wrote.
Trump made his latest comments after he suspended a short-lived U.S. effort to force open a safe passage for commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway through which major oil and gas supplies, fertilizer and other petroleum products passed before the war.
Iran’s effective closure of the strait has sent fuel prices skyrocketing, rattled the global economy and put enormous economic pressure on countries, including major powers such as China.
China’s foreign minister called for a comprehensive ceasefire Wednesday after meeting in Beijing with Iran’s top envoy. Wang Yi said his country was “deeply distressed” by the conflict, which began Feb. 28 when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran.
China’s close economic and political ties to Tehran give it a unique position of influence. The Trump administration is pressing China to use that relationship to urge the Islamic Republic to open the strait.
Meanwhile it appears that the Trump administration has been trying to conceal how much damage Iran has done to U.S. bases in the Middle East region.
The Washington Post (gift article): Iran has hit far more U.S. military assets than reported, satellite images show.
Iranian airstrikes have damaged or destroyed at least 228 structures or pieces of equipment atU.S. military sites across the Middle East since the war began, hitting hangars, barracks,fuel depots, aircraft and key radar, communications and air defense equipment, according to a Washington Post analysis of satellite imagery. The amount of destruction is far larger than what has been publicly acknowledged by the U.S. government or previously reported.
The threat of air attacks rendered some of the U.S. bases in the region too dangerous to staff at normal levels, and commanders moved most of the personnel from these sites out of the range of Iranian fire at the start of the war, officials have said.
Since the start of the war on Feb. 28, seven service members have died in strikes on U.S. facilities in the region — six in Kuwait and one in Saudi Arabia — and more than 400 troops have suffered injuries as of late April, the U.S. military said. While most of the wounded returned to duty within days, at least 12 suffered injuries that military officials classified as serious, according to U.S. officials who, among others, spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.
Satellite imagery of the Middle East is unusually difficult to acquire at present. Two of the largest commercial providers, Vantor and Planet, have complied with requests from the U.S. government — their biggest customer — to limit, delay or indefinitely withhold the publication of imagery of the region while the war is ongoing, making it difficult or impossible to assess Iran’s counterstrikes. Those restrictions began less than two weeks into the war.
Iranian state-affiliated news agencies, however, have from the start regularly published high-resolution satellite imagery on their social media accounts that claimed to document damage to U.S. sites.
Images of damage to Camp Buehring in Kuwait, released and annotated by Iranian state-affiliated media. Washington Post illustration.
For this examination — one of the first comprehensive public accounts of the damage to U.S. facilities in the region — The Post reviewed more than 100 high-resolution Iranian-released satellite images. The Post verified the authenticity of 109 of the those images by comparing them with lower-resolution imagery from the European Union’s satellite system, Copernicus, as well as high-resolution images from Planet where available. The Post excluded 19 Iranian images from the damage analysis because comparisons with the Copernicus imagery were inconclusive. No Iranian imagery was found to have been manipulated.
In a separate search of Planet imagery, Post reporters found 10 damaged or destroyed structures that were not documented in the imagery released by Iran. In all, The Post found 217 structures and 11 pieces of equipment that were damaged or destroyed at 15 U.S. military sites in the region.
Experts who reviewed The Post’s analysis said the damage at the sites suggested that the U.S. military had underestimated Iran’s targeting abilities, not adapted sufficiently to modern drone warfare and left some bases under-protected.
“The Iranian attacks were precise. There are no random craters indicating misses,” said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a retired Marine Corps colonel, who reviewed the Iranian images at The Post’s request. The Post previously revealed how Russia provided Iran with intelligence to target U.S. forces.
Read the rest and view more images using the gift link above. I wonder what it will take to repair the damage?
Here’s a bit of hopeful news from The Washington Post: Poll finds broad rejection of religion-related messages from Trump, Hegseth.
Americans are deeply uncomfortable with recent religion-related statements by President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — a striking rebuke in a closely divided country, according to a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll.
The poll finds positive ratings for Pope Leo XIV, who has criticized U.S. actions on immigration andin Iran, drawing criticism from Trump that the president repeated on Tuesday.
Eighty-seven percent of Americans have a negative view of Trump’s social media post appearing to depict himself as Jesus, according to the poll. Sixty-nine percent dislikeHegseth praying at the Pentagon for “overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Both expressions drew criticism even from Republicans and Trump voters, unusual at a time of deep political tribalism. Eighty percent of 2024 Trump voters had a negative reaction to Trump’s Jesus post, as did 79 percent of Republicans. On Hegseth’s prayer, more than 40 percent of both groups reacted negatively.
“There is only one Jesus! I found the posts to be inappropriate and offensive. Humility is at the core of being Jesus,” said Kimberly Chopin, a 57-year-old Catholic who lives in suburban Baton Rouge and voted for Trump. She added that Hegseth’s prayer calling for violence made her “extremely uncomfortable. That kind of language sounds like the language of al-Qaeda.”
Interesting.
Of course Trump is much less interested in the war he started as a distraction from the Epstein files than remaking the White House and surrounding buildings and monuments in his own image. And his number one obsession is his insane ballroom.
Now Republicans in Congress are getting into the act. We were told that the ballroom project would be paid for with private money. Suddenly, we learn that taxpayers are expected to cover the growing price tag.
The New York Times: G.O.P. Proposes $1 Billion for Security Improvements in Ballroom Project.
Senate Republicans have inserted $1 billion for White House East Wing security enhancements in the immigration enforcement funding bill they hope to rush through Congress this month, setting up a political fight over a ballroom that President Trump has said would be financed with private money.
The leaders of the Judiciary and Homeland Security Committees on Monday released plans for the roughly $70 billion package, which would significantly bolster spending on Immigration and Customs Enforcement and border patrol through the end of Mr. Trump’s term using a party-line legislative process that can skirt a filibuster.
Trump’s proposed ballroom addition to the White House
A surprise addition to the measure was the $1 billion proposed by the Judiciary Committee for security work related to Mr. Trump’s East Wing renovation. The measure does not mention the president’s proposed new ballroom, which is being challenged in court, but Mr. Trump has insisted that a main reason for the project is to enhance security.
While the president has previously insisted that the renovation would be funded through private donations, a spokesman on Tuesday said the White House applauded the proposed security funding for a “long overdue” project.
Mr. Trump and congressional Republicans have escalated their efforts to defend the project after the attempted assault late last month at a journalism gala in Washington attended by the president.
The bill says the public money would be directed to “security adjustments and upgrades, including within the perimeter fence of the White House compound to support enhancements by the Secret Service relating to the East Wing Modernization Project, including above-ground and below-ground security features.” It also bars any of the funding being spent on “non-security elements.”
WTF?!
“Republicans are on a different planet than American families,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic minority leader, said in a post on social media. “Republicans looked at families drowning in bills and decided what they really needed was more raids and a Trump ballroom.”
Top Democrats also noted that consideration of the bill would put all senators on the record on a White House construction project that polls have shown to be unpopular.
“Just flagging that now everyone gets an up or down vote on the ballroom,” Senator Brian Schatz, Democrat of Hawaii, said on social media.
Should the provision survive and be enacted into law, it could clear away legal obstacles to construction of the ballroom, which a federal judge has ruled requires congressional approval.
Republicans are advancing the legislation outside of normal congressional spending channels because Senate Democrats had blocked money for ICE and the border control in a dispute over the tactics and conduct of federal immigration officers. That fight shut down parts of the Department of Homeland Security for almost 80 days.
“The Senate Judiciary Committee is taking action to help provide certainty for federal law enforcement and safer streets for American families,” Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. “We will work to ensure this critical funding gets signed into law without unnecessary delay.”
Trump is destroying our country and our Capitol. He has to be stopped. One more on this from NPR: The many ways Trump wants to change D.C., from buildings to statues to parks.
President Trump is looking to make his mark on the White House and Washington, D.C., and not just politically.
The longtime real estate developer has either announced or embarked on a number of construction and renovation projects across the nation’s capital.
“I have two jobs,” Trump said in late 2025, the presidency being just one of them. “I have a construction job, which is really like relaxation for me because I have been doing it my entire life.”
The White House ballroom, reflecting pool resurfacing, Kennedy Center renovations and a triumphal arch are among the many changes Trump wants to make in D.C.
Some of those changes are seemingly temporary, like the huge banners of Trump’s face hanging from the Justice Department, Department of Agriculture and other federal buildings. Several concern the decor and aesthetics of the White House, like the paved-over Rose Garden and gilded Oval Office. Others are matters of nomenclature, like the addition of Trump’s name to the signs on the Kennedy Center and U.S. Institute of Peace buildings.
But many of the efforts in progress could reshape D.C.’s architectural landscape for decades to come.
Neil Flanagan, an architect and public historian in D.C., says while Trump had aesthetic ambitions during his first term, his “insistence on making it so much about his own style and his own brand and wearing this glory of America’s past is distinct to this term.” Many of his initiatives are connected to the country’s upcoming 250th anniversary in July.
“They all sort of declare the glory of America rather than actually building any kind of growth or future for America,” Flanagan says. “If you’re trying to slash the science budget … at the same [as you’re] building these grand monuments, you’re not building a creative America, you’re wearing a great American past as a costume.”
The latest change was to the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool.
Trump is resurfacing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, coating its gray bottom with a shade he described to reporters as “American flag blue.”
The 2,030-foot-long reflecting pool has been the backdrop of marches, speeches and inaugurations for a century.
It last underwent a major renovation from 2010 to 2012, both for structural fixes (to address decades of leaking and sinking) and aesthetic improvements (it was intentionally made shallower). But the Department of Interior says the wrong-size pipes were installed, resulting in the continued need for expensive refills (71 million additional gallons, exceeding $1 million, in 2019 alone).
Trump has been talking publicly about fixing the pool since at least November 2025, but ramped up his efforts in April after what he described as complaints about the state of the landmark. He told reporters that he is working with one of his best “pool builders” from his real estate days, who talked him out of a turquoise shade “like in the Bahamas.”
Flanagan says Trump is treating the pool, and the city itself, “like it’s his personal country club.”
“You get some pool guys and then they refinish it in a way that is more suitable to, basically, a swimming pool at Mar-a-Lago,” he adds.
That’s all I have for today. I can’t take anymore. \
Have a peaceful Wednesday.
#DonaldTrump #EbrahimRezaei #EsmailBaghaei #IranWarNegotiations #LincolnMemorialReflectingPool #ProjectFreedom #StraitOfHormuz #TedTurner #TrumpSBallroom -
Wednesday Reads
Good Day!!
I spent the last 3 days reading books and relaxing, and mostly avoiding watching or reading news social media. My RA pain had been pretty bad lately, and it has definitely improved as a result. I’ll have to see what happens after I engage with the news for this post, but at the moment I plan to go back on a news diet when I finish. I definitely think my health is improved by avoiding news about Trump.
Here’s what’s happening this morning:
Cable news Legend Ted Turner has died.
The New York Times (gift article): Ted Turner, Creator of CNN and the 24-Hour News Cycle, Dies at 87.
The rest of the article is fascinating–dealing with Turner’s personal life, political beliefs and more. I’ve included a gift link in case you want to read more.Ted Turner, the media mogul who cut a brash and vivid figure on the American scene of the late 20th century by dominating the cable television industry, creating the 24-hour news cycle with CNN, and extending his restless reach into professional sports, environmentalism and philanthropy, died on Wednesday at his home near Tallahassee, Fla. He was 87.
Phillip Evans, a spokesman for the family, confirmed the death. Mr. Turner announced in 2018 that he had Lewy body dementia, a progressive brain disorder.
Ted Turner
Mr. Turner’s signature creation was CNN — the Cable News Network — which revolutionized television news in 1980 by presenting it all hours of the day and eventually inspiring other media operations to follow suit. But his portfolio of business ventures bulged with much more, and their impact on American culture was considerable.
As a spinoff of CNN, Mr. Turner created the channel CNN Headline News and CNN International. He founded the cable and satellite sports and entertainment “superstation” that became known as TBS and spawned a sister channel, TNT, both of which continue to reach millions of homes.
In 1985, he bought for $1.5 billion the MGM studio’s library of films and nine years later created the cable franchise Turner Classic Movies, or TCM. He made a similar purchase of Hanna-Barbera cartoons and, relying on them, created the Cartoon Network in 1992. And in 1996, he merged his conglomerate, Turner Broadcasting System, with Time Warner to create one of the world’s largest media companies.
Along the way, he found the time and energy to captain the winning yacht in the America’s Cup race in 1977 and to take an active role as owner of the Atlanta Braves, giving the team extended national exposure on Turner-owned television.
“I’m trying to set the all-time record for achievement by one person in one lifetime,” he told the journalist Dale Van Atta in a Reader’s Digest article in 1998. “And that puts you in pretty big company: Alexander the Great, Napoleon, Gandhi, Christ, Mohammed, Buddha, Washington, Roosevelt, Churchill.”
Not even his staunchest admirers placed Mr. Turner on that high a pedestal. But even a bitter rival like the media magnate Rupert Murdoch — who once had his New York Post run the headline “Is Turner Insane?” — had to concede that he was one of the most influential figures in the history of mass media.
An Atlanta-based entrepreneur, Mr. Turner took astounding risks in business, often teetering on the edge of bankruptcy and then roaring back to multiply his fortune.
Against the advice of colleagues and the conventional wisdom of his industry peers, he poured millions of dollars into pioneering ventures that combined cable and satellite broadcasts. He warred against the big television networks. He almost lost his shirt in Hollywood but emerged from these gambles and brawls as a billionaire astride a vast cable empire of news, sports and entertainment channels.
Of course the big story is still Trump’s war with Iran. It’s difficult to know what to believe about what’s going on, since Trump and Hegseth lie constantly.
CNN reports the Trump/Hegseth line: US and Iran closing in on memorandum aimed at ending war, source says.
The United States and Iran are moving closer to an agreement on a short memorandum to end the Iran war, a regional source familiar with the negotiations said, although Trump administration officials cautioned that talks had previously fallen apart at the last minute.
The White House received positive feedback from Pakistani mediators on Tuesday that the Iranians were progressing toward a compromise, two administration officials told CNN while offering some skepticism about Pakistan’s optimism.
From CentCom: Project Freedom at Strait of Hormuz
But a renewed diplomatic push has emerged in recent days, the regional source said. President Donald Trump appears to be simplifying issues in peace negotiations so moderates in the Iranian regime can come back to the negotiating table, the source added, with the aim being to tackle thornier issues later.
A one-page plan being floated internally contains provisions that have been at the heart of negotiations to end the conflict, a person familiar with the plan told CNN. The document would declare an end to the war while triggering a 30-day negotiation period on resolving sticking points, including on nuclear issues, unfreezing Iranian assets and future security in the Strait of Hormuz, the person said.
Precise details of the plan couldn’t immediately be verified, but the source familiar said it would include discussion of a moratorium on uranium enrichment for a period of longer than 10 years. A previous US proposal had set it at 20 years.
The plan also requires Iran to ship its stockpile of highly enriched uranium out of the country, but details were still being negotiated.
News of positive movement from the Pakistanis helped spur Trump on Tuesday to announce a pause of “Project Freedom” – an operation to guide stranded ships out of the strait – citing progress in negotiations with Iran, the administration officials said. The pause came after Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that Operation Epic Fury had ended and that the administration’s full focus was on Project Freedom.
The regional source told CNN that the harder the US pushed its agenda of Project Freedom and Operation Epic Fury, the more the hardliners in Iran stood up and had a bigger voice.
The Guardian reports on Iran’s reaction: Middle East crisis live: US proposal to end war a ‘wishlist, not a reality’, warns Iranian official.
‘American wishlist, not a reality’: Iranian officials cast doubt on US proposal to end war.
Ebrahim Rezaei, the spokesperson of the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission, has poured cold water on the Axios report claiming the US and Iran were nearing a one-page memorandum to end the war, saying it was an “American wishlist [and] not a reality”.
Ebrahim Rezaei
In a fiery statement on X, he said: “Americans will not gain in a lost war what they failed to achieve in face-to-face negotiations. Iran has its finger on the trigger and is ready; if they do not surrender and grant the necessary concessions, or if they or their lapdogs attempt any mischief, we will respond with a harsh and regrettable response.
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, also responded to the Axios report, telling the Iranian Isna news agency that the US proposal is still being reviewed by Tehran.
“Once Iran concludes its assessment, it will convey its views to the Pakistani side,” Isna reported, adding that the US demands detailed in the Axios report “included excessive and unrealistic demands that have been strongly rejected by Iranian officials in recent days”.
Isna reported that the Iranian negotiating team is solely reviewing the “termination of the war” and the nuclear issue is not currently being discussed.
That doesn’t sound like an agreement is coming soon. And Trump is issuing threats.
AP: US and Iran appear to move closer to ending their war as Trump threatens more bombing.
The United States and Iran appeared to be moving closer Wednesday to an initial agreement to end the war, as U.S. President Trump sought to pressure Tehran with threats of a new wave of bombing if a deal is not reached.
Trump posted on social media that the two-month war could soon end and that oil and natural gas shipments disrupted by the conflict could restart. But he said that depends on Iran accepting a reported agreement that the president did not detail.
“If they don’t agree, the bombing starts,” Trump wrote.
Trump made his latest comments after he suspended a short-lived U.S. effort to force open a safe passage for commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway through which major oil and gas supplies, fertilizer and other petroleum products passed before the war.
Iran’s effective closure of the strait has sent fuel prices skyrocketing, rattled the global economy and put enormous economic pressure on countries, including major powers such as China.
China’s foreign minister called for a comprehensive ceasefire Wednesday after meeting in Beijing with Iran’s top envoy. Wang Yi said his country was “deeply distressed” by the conflict, which began Feb. 28 when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran.
China’s close economic and political ties to Tehran give it a unique position of influence. The Trump administration is pressing China to use that relationship to urge the Islamic Republic to open the strait.
Meanwhile it appears that the Trump administration has been trying to conceal how much damage Iran has done to U.S. bases in the Middle East region.
The Washington Post (gift article): Iran has hit far more U.S. military assets than reported, satellite images show.
Iranian airstrikes have damaged or destroyed at least 228 structures or pieces of equipment atU.S. military sites across the Middle East since the war began, hitting hangars, barracks,fuel depots, aircraft and key radar, communications and air defense equipment, according to a Washington Post analysis of satellite imagery. The amount of destruction is far larger than what has been publicly acknowledged by the U.S. government or previously reported.
The threat of air attacks rendered some of the U.S. bases in the region too dangerous to staff at normal levels, and commanders moved most of the personnel from these sites out of the range of Iranian fire at the start of the war, officials have said.
Since the start of the war on Feb. 28, seven service members have died in strikes on U.S. facilities in the region — six in Kuwait and one in Saudi Arabia — and more than 400 troops have suffered injuries as of late April, the U.S. military said. While most of the wounded returned to duty within days, at least 12 suffered injuries that military officials classified as serious, according to U.S. officials who, among others, spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.
Satellite imagery of the Middle East is unusually difficult to acquire at present. Two of the largest commercial providers, Vantor and Planet, have complied with requests from the U.S. government — their biggest customer — to limit, delay or indefinitely withhold the publication of imagery of the region while the war is ongoing, making it difficult or impossible to assess Iran’s counterstrikes. Those restrictions began less than two weeks into the war.
Iranian state-affiliated news agencies, however, have from the start regularly published high-resolution satellite imagery on their social media accounts that claimed to document damage to U.S. sites.
Images of damage to Camp Buehring in Kuwait, released and annotated by Iranian state-affiliated media. Washington Post illustration.
For this examination — one of the first comprehensive public accounts of the damage to U.S. facilities in the region — The Post reviewed more than 100 high-resolution Iranian-released satellite images. The Post verified the authenticity of 109 of the those images by comparing them with lower-resolution imagery from the European Union’s satellite system, Copernicus, as well as high-resolution images from Planet where available. The Post excluded 19 Iranian images from the damage analysis because comparisons with the Copernicus imagery were inconclusive. No Iranian imagery was found to have been manipulated.
In a separate search of Planet imagery, Post reporters found 10 damaged or destroyed structures that were not documented in the imagery released by Iran. In all, The Post found 217 structures and 11 pieces of equipment that were damaged or destroyed at 15 U.S. military sites in the region.
Experts who reviewed The Post’s analysis said the damage at the sites suggested that the U.S. military had underestimated Iran’s targeting abilities, not adapted sufficiently to modern drone warfare and left some bases under-protected.
“The Iranian attacks were precise. There are no random craters indicating misses,” said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a retired Marine Corps colonel, who reviewed the Iranian images at The Post’s request. The Post previously revealed how Russia provided Iran with intelligence to target U.S. forces.
Read the rest and view more images using the gift link above. I wonder what it will take to repair the damage?
Here’s a bit of hopeful news from The Washington Post: Poll finds broad rejection of religion-related messages from Trump, Hegseth.
Americans are deeply uncomfortable with recent religion-related statements by President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — a striking rebuke in a closely divided country, according to a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll.
The poll finds positive ratings for Pope Leo XIV, who has criticized U.S. actions on immigration andin Iran, drawing criticism from Trump that the president repeated on Tuesday.
Eighty-seven percent of Americans have a negative view of Trump’s social media post appearing to depict himself as Jesus, according to the poll. Sixty-nine percent dislikeHegseth praying at the Pentagon for “overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Both expressions drew criticism even from Republicans and Trump voters, unusual at a time of deep political tribalism. Eighty percent of 2024 Trump voters had a negative reaction to Trump’s Jesus post, as did 79 percent of Republicans. On Hegseth’s prayer, more than 40 percent of both groups reacted negatively.
“There is only one Jesus! I found the posts to be inappropriate and offensive. Humility is at the core of being Jesus,” said Kimberly Chopin, a 57-year-old Catholic who lives in suburban Baton Rouge and voted for Trump. She added that Hegseth’s prayer calling for violence made her “extremely uncomfortable. That kind of language sounds like the language of al-Qaeda.”
Interesting.
Of course Trump is much less interested in the war he started as a distraction from the Epstein files than remaking the White House and surrounding buildings and monuments in his own image. And his number one obsession is his insane ballroom.
Now Republicans in Congress are getting into the act. We were told that the ballroom project would be paid for with private money. Suddenly, we learn that taxpayers are expected to cover the growing price tag.
The New York Times: G.O.P. Proposes $1 Billion for Security Improvements in Ballroom Project.
Senate Republicans have inserted $1 billion for White House East Wing security enhancements in the immigration enforcement funding bill they hope to rush through Congress this month, setting up a political fight over a ballroom that President Trump has said would be financed with private money.
The leaders of the Judiciary and Homeland Security Committees on Monday released plans for the roughly $70 billion package, which would significantly bolster spending on Immigration and Customs Enforcement and border patrol through the end of Mr. Trump’s term using a party-line legislative process that can skirt a filibuster.
Trump’s proposed ballroom addition to the White House
A surprise addition to the measure was the $1 billion proposed by the Judiciary Committee for security work related to Mr. Trump’s East Wing renovation. The measure does not mention the president’s proposed new ballroom, which is being challenged in court, but Mr. Trump has insisted that a main reason for the project is to enhance security.
While the president has previously insisted that the renovation would be funded through private donations, a spokesman on Tuesday said the White House applauded the proposed security funding for a “long overdue” project.
Mr. Trump and congressional Republicans have escalated their efforts to defend the project after the attempted assault late last month at a journalism gala in Washington attended by the president.
The bill says the public money would be directed to “security adjustments and upgrades, including within the perimeter fence of the White House compound to support enhancements by the Secret Service relating to the East Wing Modernization Project, including above-ground and below-ground security features.” It also bars any of the funding being spent on “non-security elements.”
WTF?!
“Republicans are on a different planet than American families,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic minority leader, said in a post on social media. “Republicans looked at families drowning in bills and decided what they really needed was more raids and a Trump ballroom.”
Top Democrats also noted that consideration of the bill would put all senators on the record on a White House construction project that polls have shown to be unpopular.
“Just flagging that now everyone gets an up or down vote on the ballroom,” Senator Brian Schatz, Democrat of Hawaii, said on social media.
Should the provision survive and be enacted into law, it could clear away legal obstacles to construction of the ballroom, which a federal judge has ruled requires congressional approval.
Republicans are advancing the legislation outside of normal congressional spending channels because Senate Democrats had blocked money for ICE and the border control in a dispute over the tactics and conduct of federal immigration officers. That fight shut down parts of the Department of Homeland Security for almost 80 days.
“The Senate Judiciary Committee is taking action to help provide certainty for federal law enforcement and safer streets for American families,” Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. “We will work to ensure this critical funding gets signed into law without unnecessary delay.”
Trump is destroying our country and our Capitol. He has to be stopped. One more on this from NPR: The many ways Trump wants to change D.C., from buildings to statues to parks.
President Trump is looking to make his mark on the White House and Washington, D.C., and not just politically.
The longtime real estate developer has either announced or embarked on a number of construction and renovation projects across the nation’s capital.
“I have two jobs,” Trump said in late 2025, the presidency being just one of them. “I have a construction job, which is really like relaxation for me because I have been doing it my entire life.”
The White House ballroom, reflecting pool resurfacing, Kennedy Center renovations and a triumphal arch are among the many changes Trump wants to make in D.C.
Some of those changes are seemingly temporary, like the huge banners of Trump’s face hanging from the Justice Department, Department of Agriculture and other federal buildings. Several concern the decor and aesthetics of the White House, like the paved-over Rose Garden and gilded Oval Office. Others are matters of nomenclature, like the addition of Trump’s name to the signs on the Kennedy Center and U.S. Institute of Peace buildings.
But many of the efforts in progress could reshape D.C.’s architectural landscape for decades to come.
Neil Flanagan, an architect and public historian in D.C., says while Trump had aesthetic ambitions during his first term, his “insistence on making it so much about his own style and his own brand and wearing this glory of America’s past is distinct to this term.” Many of his initiatives are connected to the country’s upcoming 250th anniversary in July.
“They all sort of declare the glory of America rather than actually building any kind of growth or future for America,” Flanagan says. “If you’re trying to slash the science budget … at the same [as you’re] building these grand monuments, you’re not building a creative America, you’re wearing a great American past as a costume.”
The latest change was to the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool.
Trump is resurfacing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, coating its gray bottom with a shade he described to reporters as “American flag blue.”
The 2,030-foot-long reflecting pool has been the backdrop of marches, speeches and inaugurations for a century.
It last underwent a major renovation from 2010 to 2012, both for structural fixes (to address decades of leaking and sinking) and aesthetic improvements (it was intentionally made shallower). But the Department of Interior says the wrong-size pipes were installed, resulting in the continued need for expensive refills (71 million additional gallons, exceeding $1 million, in 2019 alone).
Trump has been talking publicly about fixing the pool since at least November 2025, but ramped up his efforts in April after what he described as complaints about the state of the landmark. He told reporters that he is working with one of his best “pool builders” from his real estate days, who talked him out of a turquoise shade “like in the Bahamas.”
Flanagan says Trump is treating the pool, and the city itself, “like it’s his personal country club.”
“You get some pool guys and then they refinish it in a way that is more suitable to, basically, a swimming pool at Mar-a-Lago,” he adds.
That’s all I have for today. I can’t take anymore. \
Have a peaceful Wednesday.
#DonaldTrump #EbrahimRezaei #EsmailBaghaei #IranWarNegotiations #LincolnMemorialReflectingPool #ProjectFreedom #StraitOfHormuz #TedTurner #TrumpSBallroom -
Wednesday Reads
Good Day!!
I spent the last 3 days reading books and relaxing, and mostly avoiding watching or reading news social media. My RA pain had been pretty bad lately, and it has definitely improved as a result. I’ll have to see what happens after I engage with the news for this post, but at the moment I plan to go back on a news diet when I finish. I definitely think my health is improved by avoiding news about Trump.
Here’s what’s happening this morning:
Cable news Legend Ted Turner has died.
The New York Times (gift article): Ted Turner, Creator of CNN and the 24-Hour News Cycle, Dies at 87.
The rest of the article is fascinating–dealing with Turner’s personal life, political beliefs and more. I’ve included a gift link in case you want to read more.Ted Turner, the media mogul who cut a brash and vivid figure on the American scene of the late 20th century by dominating the cable television industry, creating the 24-hour news cycle with CNN, and extending his restless reach into professional sports, environmentalism and philanthropy, died on Wednesday at his home near Tallahassee, Fla. He was 87.
Phillip Evans, a spokesman for the family, confirmed the death. Mr. Turner announced in 2018 that he had Lewy body dementia, a progressive brain disorder.
Ted Turner
Mr. Turner’s signature creation was CNN — the Cable News Network — which revolutionized television news in 1980 by presenting it all hours of the day and eventually inspiring other media operations to follow suit. But his portfolio of business ventures bulged with much more, and their impact on American culture was considerable.
As a spinoff of CNN, Mr. Turner created the channel CNN Headline News and CNN International. He founded the cable and satellite sports and entertainment “superstation” that became known as TBS and spawned a sister channel, TNT, both of which continue to reach millions of homes.
In 1985, he bought for $1.5 billion the MGM studio’s library of films and nine years later created the cable franchise Turner Classic Movies, or TCM. He made a similar purchase of Hanna-Barbera cartoons and, relying on them, created the Cartoon Network in 1992. And in 1996, he merged his conglomerate, Turner Broadcasting System, with Time Warner to create one of the world’s largest media companies.
Along the way, he found the time and energy to captain the winning yacht in the America’s Cup race in 1977 and to take an active role as owner of the Atlanta Braves, giving the team extended national exposure on Turner-owned television.
“I’m trying to set the all-time record for achievement by one person in one lifetime,” he told the journalist Dale Van Atta in a Reader’s Digest article in 1998. “And that puts you in pretty big company: Alexander the Great, Napoleon, Gandhi, Christ, Mohammed, Buddha, Washington, Roosevelt, Churchill.”
Not even his staunchest admirers placed Mr. Turner on that high a pedestal. But even a bitter rival like the media magnate Rupert Murdoch — who once had his New York Post run the headline “Is Turner Insane?” — had to concede that he was one of the most influential figures in the history of mass media.
An Atlanta-based entrepreneur, Mr. Turner took astounding risks in business, often teetering on the edge of bankruptcy and then roaring back to multiply his fortune.
Against the advice of colleagues and the conventional wisdom of his industry peers, he poured millions of dollars into pioneering ventures that combined cable and satellite broadcasts. He warred against the big television networks. He almost lost his shirt in Hollywood but emerged from these gambles and brawls as a billionaire astride a vast cable empire of news, sports and entertainment channels.
Of course the big story is still Trump’s war with Iran. It’s difficult to know what to believe about what’s going on, since Trump and Hegseth lie constantly.
CNN reports the Trump/Hegseth line: US and Iran closing in on memorandum aimed at ending war, source says.
The United States and Iran are moving closer to an agreement on a short memorandum to end the Iran war, a regional source familiar with the negotiations said, although Trump administration officials cautioned that talks had previously fallen apart at the last minute.
The White House received positive feedback from Pakistani mediators on Tuesday that the Iranians were progressing toward a compromise, two administration officials told CNN while offering some skepticism about Pakistan’s optimism.
From CentCom: Project Freedom at Strait of Hormuz
But a renewed diplomatic push has emerged in recent days, the regional source said. President Donald Trump appears to be simplifying issues in peace negotiations so moderates in the Iranian regime can come back to the negotiating table, the source added, with the aim being to tackle thornier issues later.
A one-page plan being floated internally contains provisions that have been at the heart of negotiations to end the conflict, a person familiar with the plan told CNN. The document would declare an end to the war while triggering a 30-day negotiation period on resolving sticking points, including on nuclear issues, unfreezing Iranian assets and future security in the Strait of Hormuz, the person said.
Precise details of the plan couldn’t immediately be verified, but the source familiar said it would include discussion of a moratorium on uranium enrichment for a period of longer than 10 years. A previous US proposal had set it at 20 years.
The plan also requires Iran to ship its stockpile of highly enriched uranium out of the country, but details were still being negotiated.
News of positive movement from the Pakistanis helped spur Trump on Tuesday to announce a pause of “Project Freedom” – an operation to guide stranded ships out of the strait – citing progress in negotiations with Iran, the administration officials said. The pause came after Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that Operation Epic Fury had ended and that the administration’s full focus was on Project Freedom.
The regional source told CNN that the harder the US pushed its agenda of Project Freedom and Operation Epic Fury, the more the hardliners in Iran stood up and had a bigger voice.
The Guardian reports on Iran’s reaction: Middle East crisis live: US proposal to end war a ‘wishlist, not a reality’, warns Iranian official.
‘American wishlist, not a reality’: Iranian officials cast doubt on US proposal to end war.
Ebrahim Rezaei, the spokesperson of the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission, has poured cold water on the Axios report claiming the US and Iran were nearing a one-page memorandum to end the war, saying it was an “American wishlist [and] not a reality”.
Ebrahim Rezaei
In a fiery statement on X, he said: “Americans will not gain in a lost war what they failed to achieve in face-to-face negotiations. Iran has its finger on the trigger and is ready; if they do not surrender and grant the necessary concessions, or if they or their lapdogs attempt any mischief, we will respond with a harsh and regrettable response.
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, also responded to the Axios report, telling the Iranian Isna news agency that the US proposal is still being reviewed by Tehran.
“Once Iran concludes its assessment, it will convey its views to the Pakistani side,” Isna reported, adding that the US demands detailed in the Axios report “included excessive and unrealistic demands that have been strongly rejected by Iranian officials in recent days”.
Isna reported that the Iranian negotiating team is solely reviewing the “termination of the war” and the nuclear issue is not currently being discussed.
That doesn’t sound like an agreement is coming soon. And Trump is issuing threats.
AP: US and Iran appear to move closer to ending their war as Trump threatens more bombing.
The United States and Iran appeared to be moving closer Wednesday to an initial agreement to end the war, as U.S. President Trump sought to pressure Tehran with threats of a new wave of bombing if a deal is not reached.
Trump posted on social media that the two-month war could soon end and that oil and natural gas shipments disrupted by the conflict could restart. But he said that depends on Iran accepting a reported agreement that the president did not detail.
“If they don’t agree, the bombing starts,” Trump wrote.
Trump made his latest comments after he suspended a short-lived U.S. effort to force open a safe passage for commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway through which major oil and gas supplies, fertilizer and other petroleum products passed before the war.
Iran’s effective closure of the strait has sent fuel prices skyrocketing, rattled the global economy and put enormous economic pressure on countries, including major powers such as China.
China’s foreign minister called for a comprehensive ceasefire Wednesday after meeting in Beijing with Iran’s top envoy. Wang Yi said his country was “deeply distressed” by the conflict, which began Feb. 28 when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran.
China’s close economic and political ties to Tehran give it a unique position of influence. The Trump administration is pressing China to use that relationship to urge the Islamic Republic to open the strait.
Meanwhile it appears that the Trump administration has been trying to conceal how much damage Iran has done to U.S. bases in the Middle East region.
The Washington Post (gift article): Iran has hit far more U.S. military assets than reported, satellite images show.
Iranian airstrikes have damaged or destroyed at least 228 structures or pieces of equipment atU.S. military sites across the Middle East since the war began, hitting hangars, barracks,fuel depots, aircraft and key radar, communications and air defense equipment, according to a Washington Post analysis of satellite imagery. The amount of destruction is far larger than what has been publicly acknowledged by the U.S. government or previously reported.
The threat of air attacks rendered some of the U.S. bases in the region too dangerous to staff at normal levels, and commanders moved most of the personnel from these sites out of the range of Iranian fire at the start of the war, officials have said.
Since the start of the war on Feb. 28, seven service members have died in strikes on U.S. facilities in the region — six in Kuwait and one in Saudi Arabia — and more than 400 troops have suffered injuries as of late April, the U.S. military said. While most of the wounded returned to duty within days, at least 12 suffered injuries that military officials classified as serious, according to U.S. officials who, among others, spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.
Satellite imagery of the Middle East is unusually difficult to acquire at present. Two of the largest commercial providers, Vantor and Planet, have complied with requests from the U.S. government — their biggest customer — to limit, delay or indefinitely withhold the publication of imagery of the region while the war is ongoing, making it difficult or impossible to assess Iran’s counterstrikes. Those restrictions began less than two weeks into the war.
Iranian state-affiliated news agencies, however, have from the start regularly published high-resolution satellite imagery on their social media accounts that claimed to document damage to U.S. sites.
Images of damage to Camp Buehring in Kuwait, released and annotated by Iranian state-affiliated media. Washington Post illustration.
For this examination — one of the first comprehensive public accounts of the damage to U.S. facilities in the region — The Post reviewed more than 100 high-resolution Iranian-released satellite images. The Post verified the authenticity of 109 of the those images by comparing them with lower-resolution imagery from the European Union’s satellite system, Copernicus, as well as high-resolution images from Planet where available. The Post excluded 19 Iranian images from the damage analysis because comparisons with the Copernicus imagery were inconclusive. No Iranian imagery was found to have been manipulated.
In a separate search of Planet imagery, Post reporters found 10 damaged or destroyed structures that were not documented in the imagery released by Iran. In all, The Post found 217 structures and 11 pieces of equipment that were damaged or destroyed at 15 U.S. military sites in the region.
Experts who reviewed The Post’s analysis said the damage at the sites suggested that the U.S. military had underestimated Iran’s targeting abilities, not adapted sufficiently to modern drone warfare and left some bases under-protected.
“The Iranian attacks were precise. There are no random craters indicating misses,” said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a retired Marine Corps colonel, who reviewed the Iranian images at The Post’s request. The Post previously revealed how Russia provided Iran with intelligence to target U.S. forces.
Read the rest and view more images using the gift link above. I wonder what it will take to repair the damage?
Here’s a bit of hopeful news from The Washington Post: Poll finds broad rejection of religion-related messages from Trump, Hegseth.
Americans are deeply uncomfortable with recent religion-related statements by President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — a striking rebuke in a closely divided country, according to a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll.
The poll finds positive ratings for Pope Leo XIV, who has criticized U.S. actions on immigration andin Iran, drawing criticism from Trump that the president repeated on Tuesday.
Eighty-seven percent of Americans have a negative view of Trump’s social media post appearing to depict himself as Jesus, according to the poll. Sixty-nine percent dislikeHegseth praying at the Pentagon for “overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Both expressions drew criticism even from Republicans and Trump voters, unusual at a time of deep political tribalism. Eighty percent of 2024 Trump voters had a negative reaction to Trump’s Jesus post, as did 79 percent of Republicans. On Hegseth’s prayer, more than 40 percent of both groups reacted negatively.
“There is only one Jesus! I found the posts to be inappropriate and offensive. Humility is at the core of being Jesus,” said Kimberly Chopin, a 57-year-old Catholic who lives in suburban Baton Rouge and voted for Trump. She added that Hegseth’s prayer calling for violence made her “extremely uncomfortable. That kind of language sounds like the language of al-Qaeda.”
Interesting.
Of course Trump is much less interested in the war he started as a distraction from the Epstein files than remaking the White House and surrounding buildings and monuments in his own image. And his number one obsession is his insane ballroom.
Now Republicans in Congress are getting into the act. We were told that the ballroom project would be paid for with private money. Suddenly, we learn that taxpayers are expected to cover the growing price tag.
The New York Times: G.O.P. Proposes $1 Billion for Security Improvements in Ballroom Project.
Senate Republicans have inserted $1 billion for White House East Wing security enhancements in the immigration enforcement funding bill they hope to rush through Congress this month, setting up a political fight over a ballroom that President Trump has said would be financed with private money.
The leaders of the Judiciary and Homeland Security Committees on Monday released plans for the roughly $70 billion package, which would significantly bolster spending on Immigration and Customs Enforcement and border patrol through the end of Mr. Trump’s term using a party-line legislative process that can skirt a filibuster.
Trump’s proposed ballroom addition to the White House
A surprise addition to the measure was the $1 billion proposed by the Judiciary Committee for security work related to Mr. Trump’s East Wing renovation. The measure does not mention the president’s proposed new ballroom, which is being challenged in court, but Mr. Trump has insisted that a main reason for the project is to enhance security.
While the president has previously insisted that the renovation would be funded through private donations, a spokesman on Tuesday said the White House applauded the proposed security funding for a “long overdue” project.
Mr. Trump and congressional Republicans have escalated their efforts to defend the project after the attempted assault late last month at a journalism gala in Washington attended by the president.
The bill says the public money would be directed to “security adjustments and upgrades, including within the perimeter fence of the White House compound to support enhancements by the Secret Service relating to the East Wing Modernization Project, including above-ground and below-ground security features.” It also bars any of the funding being spent on “non-security elements.”
WTF?!
“Republicans are on a different planet than American families,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic minority leader, said in a post on social media. “Republicans looked at families drowning in bills and decided what they really needed was more raids and a Trump ballroom.”
Top Democrats also noted that consideration of the bill would put all senators on the record on a White House construction project that polls have shown to be unpopular.
“Just flagging that now everyone gets an up or down vote on the ballroom,” Senator Brian Schatz, Democrat of Hawaii, said on social media.
Should the provision survive and be enacted into law, it could clear away legal obstacles to construction of the ballroom, which a federal judge has ruled requires congressional approval.
Republicans are advancing the legislation outside of normal congressional spending channels because Senate Democrats had blocked money for ICE and the border control in a dispute over the tactics and conduct of federal immigration officers. That fight shut down parts of the Department of Homeland Security for almost 80 days.
“The Senate Judiciary Committee is taking action to help provide certainty for federal law enforcement and safer streets for American families,” Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. “We will work to ensure this critical funding gets signed into law without unnecessary delay.”
Trump is destroying our country and our Capitol. He has to be stopped. One more on this from NPR: The many ways Trump wants to change D.C., from buildings to statues to parks.
President Trump is looking to make his mark on the White House and Washington, D.C., and not just politically.
The longtime real estate developer has either announced or embarked on a number of construction and renovation projects across the nation’s capital.
“I have two jobs,” Trump said in late 2025, the presidency being just one of them. “I have a construction job, which is really like relaxation for me because I have been doing it my entire life.”
The White House ballroom, reflecting pool resurfacing, Kennedy Center renovations and a triumphal arch are among the many changes Trump wants to make in D.C.
Some of those changes are seemingly temporary, like the huge banners of Trump’s face hanging from the Justice Department, Department of Agriculture and other federal buildings. Several concern the decor and aesthetics of the White House, like the paved-over Rose Garden and gilded Oval Office. Others are matters of nomenclature, like the addition of Trump’s name to the signs on the Kennedy Center and U.S. Institute of Peace buildings.
But many of the efforts in progress could reshape D.C.’s architectural landscape for decades to come.
Neil Flanagan, an architect and public historian in D.C., says while Trump had aesthetic ambitions during his first term, his “insistence on making it so much about his own style and his own brand and wearing this glory of America’s past is distinct to this term.” Many of his initiatives are connected to the country’s upcoming 250th anniversary in July.
“They all sort of declare the glory of America rather than actually building any kind of growth or future for America,” Flanagan says. “If you’re trying to slash the science budget … at the same [as you’re] building these grand monuments, you’re not building a creative America, you’re wearing a great American past as a costume.”
The latest change was to the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool.
Trump is resurfacing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, coating its gray bottom with a shade he described to reporters as “American flag blue.”
The 2,030-foot-long reflecting pool has been the backdrop of marches, speeches and inaugurations for a century.
It last underwent a major renovation from 2010 to 2012, both for structural fixes (to address decades of leaking and sinking) and aesthetic improvements (it was intentionally made shallower). But the Department of Interior says the wrong-size pipes were installed, resulting in the continued need for expensive refills (71 million additional gallons, exceeding $1 million, in 2019 alone).
Trump has been talking publicly about fixing the pool since at least November 2025, but ramped up his efforts in April after what he described as complaints about the state of the landmark. He told reporters that he is working with one of his best “pool builders” from his real estate days, who talked him out of a turquoise shade “like in the Bahamas.”
Flanagan says Trump is treating the pool, and the city itself, “like it’s his personal country club.”
“You get some pool guys and then they refinish it in a way that is more suitable to, basically, a swimming pool at Mar-a-Lago,” he adds.
That’s all I have for today. I can’t take anymore. \
Have a peaceful Wednesday.
#DonaldTrump #EbrahimRezaei #EsmailBaghaei #IranWarNegotiations #LincolnMemorialReflectingPool #ProjectFreedom #StraitOfHormuz #TedTurner #TrumpSBallroom -
Wednesday Reads
Good Day!!
I spent the last 3 days reading books and relaxing, and mostly avoiding watching or reading news social media. My RA pain had been pretty bad lately, and it has definitely improved as a result. I’ll have to see what happens after I engage with the news for this post, but at the moment I plan to go back on a news diet when I finish. I definitely think my health is improved by avoiding news about Trump.
Here’s what’s happening this morning:
Cable news Legend Ted Turner has died.
The New York Times (gift article): Ted Turner, Creator of CNN and the 24-Hour News Cycle, Dies at 87.
The rest of the article is fascinating–dealing with Turner’s personal life, political beliefs and more. I’ve included a gift link in case you want to read more.Ted Turner, the media mogul who cut a brash and vivid figure on the American scene of the late 20th century by dominating the cable television industry, creating the 24-hour news cycle with CNN, and extending his restless reach into professional sports, environmentalism and philanthropy, died on Wednesday at his home near Tallahassee, Fla. He was 87.
Phillip Evans, a spokesman for the family, confirmed the death. Mr. Turner announced in 2018 that he had Lewy body dementia, a progressive brain disorder.
Ted Turner
Mr. Turner’s signature creation was CNN — the Cable News Network — which revolutionized television news in 1980 by presenting it all hours of the day and eventually inspiring other media operations to follow suit. But his portfolio of business ventures bulged with much more, and their impact on American culture was considerable.
As a spinoff of CNN, Mr. Turner created the channel CNN Headline News and CNN International. He founded the cable and satellite sports and entertainment “superstation” that became known as TBS and spawned a sister channel, TNT, both of which continue to reach millions of homes.
In 1985, he bought for $1.5 billion the MGM studio’s library of films and nine years later created the cable franchise Turner Classic Movies, or TCM. He made a similar purchase of Hanna-Barbera cartoons and, relying on them, created the Cartoon Network in 1992. And in 1996, he merged his conglomerate, Turner Broadcasting System, with Time Warner to create one of the world’s largest media companies.
Along the way, he found the time and energy to captain the winning yacht in the America’s Cup race in 1977 and to take an active role as owner of the Atlanta Braves, giving the team extended national exposure on Turner-owned television.
“I’m trying to set the all-time record for achievement by one person in one lifetime,” he told the journalist Dale Van Atta in a Reader’s Digest article in 1998. “And that puts you in pretty big company: Alexander the Great, Napoleon, Gandhi, Christ, Mohammed, Buddha, Washington, Roosevelt, Churchill.”
Not even his staunchest admirers placed Mr. Turner on that high a pedestal. But even a bitter rival like the media magnate Rupert Murdoch — who once had his New York Post run the headline “Is Turner Insane?” — had to concede that he was one of the most influential figures in the history of mass media.
An Atlanta-based entrepreneur, Mr. Turner took astounding risks in business, often teetering on the edge of bankruptcy and then roaring back to multiply his fortune.
Against the advice of colleagues and the conventional wisdom of his industry peers, he poured millions of dollars into pioneering ventures that combined cable and satellite broadcasts. He warred against the big television networks. He almost lost his shirt in Hollywood but emerged from these gambles and brawls as a billionaire astride a vast cable empire of news, sports and entertainment channels.
Of course the big story is still Trump’s war with Iran. It’s difficult to know what to believe about what’s going on, since Trump and Hegseth lie constantly.
CNN reports the Trump/Hegseth line: US and Iran closing in on memorandum aimed at ending war, source says.
The United States and Iran are moving closer to an agreement on a short memorandum to end the Iran war, a regional source familiar with the negotiations said, although Trump administration officials cautioned that talks had previously fallen apart at the last minute.
The White House received positive feedback from Pakistani mediators on Tuesday that the Iranians were progressing toward a compromise, two administration officials told CNN while offering some skepticism about Pakistan’s optimism.
From CentCom: Project Freedom at Strait of Hormuz
But a renewed diplomatic push has emerged in recent days, the regional source said. President Donald Trump appears to be simplifying issues in peace negotiations so moderates in the Iranian regime can come back to the negotiating table, the source added, with the aim being to tackle thornier issues later.
A one-page plan being floated internally contains provisions that have been at the heart of negotiations to end the conflict, a person familiar with the plan told CNN. The document would declare an end to the war while triggering a 30-day negotiation period on resolving sticking points, including on nuclear issues, unfreezing Iranian assets and future security in the Strait of Hormuz, the person said.
Precise details of the plan couldn’t immediately be verified, but the source familiar said it would include discussion of a moratorium on uranium enrichment for a period of longer than 10 years. A previous US proposal had set it at 20 years.
The plan also requires Iran to ship its stockpile of highly enriched uranium out of the country, but details were still being negotiated.
News of positive movement from the Pakistanis helped spur Trump on Tuesday to announce a pause of “Project Freedom” – an operation to guide stranded ships out of the strait – citing progress in negotiations with Iran, the administration officials said. The pause came after Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that Operation Epic Fury had ended and that the administration’s full focus was on Project Freedom.
The regional source told CNN that the harder the US pushed its agenda of Project Freedom and Operation Epic Fury, the more the hardliners in Iran stood up and had a bigger voice.
The Guardian reports on Iran’s reaction: Middle East crisis live: US proposal to end war a ‘wishlist, not a reality’, warns Iranian official.
‘American wishlist, not a reality’: Iranian officials cast doubt on US proposal to end war.
Ebrahim Rezaei, the spokesperson of the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission, has poured cold water on the Axios report claiming the US and Iran were nearing a one-page memorandum to end the war, saying it was an “American wishlist [and] not a reality”.
Ebrahim Rezaei
In a fiery statement on X, he said: “Americans will not gain in a lost war what they failed to achieve in face-to-face negotiations. Iran has its finger on the trigger and is ready; if they do not surrender and grant the necessary concessions, or if they or their lapdogs attempt any mischief, we will respond with a harsh and regrettable response.
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, also responded to the Axios report, telling the Iranian Isna news agency that the US proposal is still being reviewed by Tehran.
“Once Iran concludes its assessment, it will convey its views to the Pakistani side,” Isna reported, adding that the US demands detailed in the Axios report “included excessive and unrealistic demands that have been strongly rejected by Iranian officials in recent days”.
Isna reported that the Iranian negotiating team is solely reviewing the “termination of the war” and the nuclear issue is not currently being discussed.
That doesn’t sound like an agreement is coming soon. And Trump is issuing threats.
AP: US and Iran appear to move closer to ending their war as Trump threatens more bombing.
The United States and Iran appeared to be moving closer Wednesday to an initial agreement to end the war, as U.S. President Trump sought to pressure Tehran with threats of a new wave of bombing if a deal is not reached.
Trump posted on social media that the two-month war could soon end and that oil and natural gas shipments disrupted by the conflict could restart. But he said that depends on Iran accepting a reported agreement that the president did not detail.
“If they don’t agree, the bombing starts,” Trump wrote.
Trump made his latest comments after he suspended a short-lived U.S. effort to force open a safe passage for commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway through which major oil and gas supplies, fertilizer and other petroleum products passed before the war.
Iran’s effective closure of the strait has sent fuel prices skyrocketing, rattled the global economy and put enormous economic pressure on countries, including major powers such as China.
China’s foreign minister called for a comprehensive ceasefire Wednesday after meeting in Beijing with Iran’s top envoy. Wang Yi said his country was “deeply distressed” by the conflict, which began Feb. 28 when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran.
China’s close economic and political ties to Tehran give it a unique position of influence. The Trump administration is pressing China to use that relationship to urge the Islamic Republic to open the strait.
Meanwhile it appears that the Trump administration has been trying to conceal how much damage Iran has done to U.S. bases in the Middle East region.
The Washington Post (gift article): Iran has hit far more U.S. military assets than reported, satellite images show.
Iranian airstrikes have damaged or destroyed at least 228 structures or pieces of equipment atU.S. military sites across the Middle East since the war began, hitting hangars, barracks,fuel depots, aircraft and key radar, communications and air defense equipment, according to a Washington Post analysis of satellite imagery. The amount of destruction is far larger than what has been publicly acknowledged by the U.S. government or previously reported.
The threat of air attacks rendered some of the U.S. bases in the region too dangerous to staff at normal levels, and commanders moved most of the personnel from these sites out of the range of Iranian fire at the start of the war, officials have said.
Since the start of the war on Feb. 28, seven service members have died in strikes on U.S. facilities in the region — six in Kuwait and one in Saudi Arabia — and more than 400 troops have suffered injuries as of late April, the U.S. military said. While most of the wounded returned to duty within days, at least 12 suffered injuries that military officials classified as serious, according to U.S. officials who, among others, spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.
Satellite imagery of the Middle East is unusually difficult to acquire at present. Two of the largest commercial providers, Vantor and Planet, have complied with requests from the U.S. government — their biggest customer — to limit, delay or indefinitely withhold the publication of imagery of the region while the war is ongoing, making it difficult or impossible to assess Iran’s counterstrikes. Those restrictions began less than two weeks into the war.
Iranian state-affiliated news agencies, however, have from the start regularly published high-resolution satellite imagery on their social media accounts that claimed to document damage to U.S. sites.
Images of damage to Camp Buehring in Kuwait, released and annotated by Iranian state-affiliated media. Washington Post illustration.
For this examination — one of the first comprehensive public accounts of the damage to U.S. facilities in the region — The Post reviewed more than 100 high-resolution Iranian-released satellite images. The Post verified the authenticity of 109 of the those images by comparing them with lower-resolution imagery from the European Union’s satellite system, Copernicus, as well as high-resolution images from Planet where available. The Post excluded 19 Iranian images from the damage analysis because comparisons with the Copernicus imagery were inconclusive. No Iranian imagery was found to have been manipulated.
In a separate search of Planet imagery, Post reporters found 10 damaged or destroyed structures that were not documented in the imagery released by Iran. In all, The Post found 217 structures and 11 pieces of equipment that were damaged or destroyed at 15 U.S. military sites in the region.
Experts who reviewed The Post’s analysis said the damage at the sites suggested that the U.S. military had underestimated Iran’s targeting abilities, not adapted sufficiently to modern drone warfare and left some bases under-protected.
“The Iranian attacks were precise. There are no random craters indicating misses,” said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a retired Marine Corps colonel, who reviewed the Iranian images at The Post’s request. The Post previously revealed how Russia provided Iran with intelligence to target U.S. forces.
Read the rest and view more images using the gift link above. I wonder what it will take to repair the damage?
Here’s a bit of hopeful news from The Washington Post: Poll finds broad rejection of religion-related messages from Trump, Hegseth.
Americans are deeply uncomfortable with recent religion-related statements by President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — a striking rebuke in a closely divided country, according to a Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll.
The poll finds positive ratings for Pope Leo XIV, who has criticized U.S. actions on immigration andin Iran, drawing criticism from Trump that the president repeated on Tuesday.
Eighty-seven percent of Americans have a negative view of Trump’s social media post appearing to depict himself as Jesus, according to the poll. Sixty-nine percent dislikeHegseth praying at the Pentagon for “overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
Both expressions drew criticism even from Republicans and Trump voters, unusual at a time of deep political tribalism. Eighty percent of 2024 Trump voters had a negative reaction to Trump’s Jesus post, as did 79 percent of Republicans. On Hegseth’s prayer, more than 40 percent of both groups reacted negatively.
“There is only one Jesus! I found the posts to be inappropriate and offensive. Humility is at the core of being Jesus,” said Kimberly Chopin, a 57-year-old Catholic who lives in suburban Baton Rouge and voted for Trump. She added that Hegseth’s prayer calling for violence made her “extremely uncomfortable. That kind of language sounds like the language of al-Qaeda.”
Interesting.
Of course Trump is much less interested in the war he started as a distraction from the Epstein files than remaking the White House and surrounding buildings and monuments in his own image. And his number one obsession is his insane ballroom.
Now Republicans in Congress are getting into the act. We were told that the ballroom project would be paid for with private money. Suddenly, we learn that taxpayers are expected to cover the growing price tag.
The New York Times: G.O.P. Proposes $1 Billion for Security Improvements in Ballroom Project.
Senate Republicans have inserted $1 billion for White House East Wing security enhancements in the immigration enforcement funding bill they hope to rush through Congress this month, setting up a political fight over a ballroom that President Trump has said would be financed with private money.
The leaders of the Judiciary and Homeland Security Committees on Monday released plans for the roughly $70 billion package, which would significantly bolster spending on Immigration and Customs Enforcement and border patrol through the end of Mr. Trump’s term using a party-line legislative process that can skirt a filibuster.
Trump’s proposed ballroom addition to the White House
A surprise addition to the measure was the $1 billion proposed by the Judiciary Committee for security work related to Mr. Trump’s East Wing renovation. The measure does not mention the president’s proposed new ballroom, which is being challenged in court, but Mr. Trump has insisted that a main reason for the project is to enhance security.
While the president has previously insisted that the renovation would be funded through private donations, a spokesman on Tuesday said the White House applauded the proposed security funding for a “long overdue” project.
Mr. Trump and congressional Republicans have escalated their efforts to defend the project after the attempted assault late last month at a journalism gala in Washington attended by the president.
The bill says the public money would be directed to “security adjustments and upgrades, including within the perimeter fence of the White House compound to support enhancements by the Secret Service relating to the East Wing Modernization Project, including above-ground and below-ground security features.” It also bars any of the funding being spent on “non-security elements.”
WTF?!
“Republicans are on a different planet than American families,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic minority leader, said in a post on social media. “Republicans looked at families drowning in bills and decided what they really needed was more raids and a Trump ballroom.”
Top Democrats also noted that consideration of the bill would put all senators on the record on a White House construction project that polls have shown to be unpopular.
“Just flagging that now everyone gets an up or down vote on the ballroom,” Senator Brian Schatz, Democrat of Hawaii, said on social media.
Should the provision survive and be enacted into law, it could clear away legal obstacles to construction of the ballroom, which a federal judge has ruled requires congressional approval.
Republicans are advancing the legislation outside of normal congressional spending channels because Senate Democrats had blocked money for ICE and the border control in a dispute over the tactics and conduct of federal immigration officers. That fight shut down parts of the Department of Homeland Security for almost 80 days.
“The Senate Judiciary Committee is taking action to help provide certainty for federal law enforcement and safer streets for American families,” Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. “We will work to ensure this critical funding gets signed into law without unnecessary delay.”
Trump is destroying our country and our Capitol. He has to be stopped. One more on this from NPR: The many ways Trump wants to change D.C., from buildings to statues to parks.
President Trump is looking to make his mark on the White House and Washington, D.C., and not just politically.
The longtime real estate developer has either announced or embarked on a number of construction and renovation projects across the nation’s capital.
“I have two jobs,” Trump said in late 2025, the presidency being just one of them. “I have a construction job, which is really like relaxation for me because I have been doing it my entire life.”
The White House ballroom, reflecting pool resurfacing, Kennedy Center renovations and a triumphal arch are among the many changes Trump wants to make in D.C.
Some of those changes are seemingly temporary, like the huge banners of Trump’s face hanging from the Justice Department, Department of Agriculture and other federal buildings. Several concern the decor and aesthetics of the White House, like the paved-over Rose Garden and gilded Oval Office. Others are matters of nomenclature, like the addition of Trump’s name to the signs on the Kennedy Center and U.S. Institute of Peace buildings.
But many of the efforts in progress could reshape D.C.’s architectural landscape for decades to come.
Neil Flanagan, an architect and public historian in D.C., says while Trump had aesthetic ambitions during his first term, his “insistence on making it so much about his own style and his own brand and wearing this glory of America’s past is distinct to this term.” Many of his initiatives are connected to the country’s upcoming 250th anniversary in July.
“They all sort of declare the glory of America rather than actually building any kind of growth or future for America,” Flanagan says. “If you’re trying to slash the science budget … at the same [as you’re] building these grand monuments, you’re not building a creative America, you’re wearing a great American past as a costume.”
The latest change was to the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool.
Trump is resurfacing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, coating its gray bottom with a shade he described to reporters as “American flag blue.”
The 2,030-foot-long reflecting pool has been the backdrop of marches, speeches and inaugurations for a century.
It last underwent a major renovation from 2010 to 2012, both for structural fixes (to address decades of leaking and sinking) and aesthetic improvements (it was intentionally made shallower). But the Department of Interior says the wrong-size pipes were installed, resulting in the continued need for expensive refills (71 million additional gallons, exceeding $1 million, in 2019 alone).
Trump has been talking publicly about fixing the pool since at least November 2025, but ramped up his efforts in April after what he described as complaints about the state of the landmark. He told reporters that he is working with one of his best “pool builders” from his real estate days, who talked him out of a turquoise shade “like in the Bahamas.”
Flanagan says Trump is treating the pool, and the city itself, “like it’s his personal country club.”
“You get some pool guys and then they refinish it in a way that is more suitable to, basically, a swimming pool at Mar-a-Lago,” he adds.
That’s all I have for today. I can’t take anymore. \
Have a peaceful Wednesday.
#DonaldTrump #EbrahimRezaei #EsmailBaghaei #IranWarNegotiations #LincolnMemorialReflectingPool #ProjectFreedom #StraitOfHormuz #TedTurner #TrumpSBallroom -
Would of, could of, might of, must of
When we say would have, could have, should have, must have, might have, may have and ought to have, we often put some stress on the modal auxiliary and none on the have. We may show this in writing by abbreviating to could’ve, must’ve, etc. (Would can contract further by merging with the subject: We would have → We’d’ve.)
Unstressed ’ve is phonetically identical (/əv/) to unstressed of: hence the widespread misspellings would of, could of, should of, must of, might of, may of, and ought to of. Negative forms also appear: shouldn’t of, mightn’t of, etc. This explanation – that misanalysis of the notorious schwa lies behind the error – has general support among linguists.
The mistake dates to at least 1837, according to the OED, so it has probably been infuriating pedants for almost 200 years. Common words spelt incorrectly provoke particular ire, sometimes accompanied by aspersions cast on the writer’s intelligence, fitness for society, degree of evolution, and so on. But there’s no need for any of that.
Usage authorities unanimously call it a mistake, though some allow for its deliberate use (more on that below). Many associate it specifically with children and other less educated writers. For example, Garner’s Dictionary of Modern American Usage finds it a practice of ‘semiliterate writers’, and accepts no excuses: ‘the word is have, or a contraction ending in ’ve, and it should be written so.’
Merriam-Webster’s Pocket Guide to English Usage says ‘children and those who have not completed grammar school may have an excuse for making this mistake, but most others do not.’ What’s meant by that most is what we’ll now consider: that the misspellings don’t always indicate carelessness or relative illiteracy.
The Columbia Guide to Standard American English finds room for the anomalous forms as a stylistic device:
substituting of for ’ve in writing can be an example of eye dialect, which deliberately misspells words to suggest Nonstandard or dialectal speech. . . . The important thing is to correct it when it isn’t intentional.
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of English Usage elaborates on this, saying writers use the spelling ‘to create an unlettered persona’. It cites several examples, including a ‘he’d of got me’ from F. Scott Fitzgerald, who ‘used the spelling to represent the speech of a woman who was not overeducated’, as MWDEU politely puts it.
Here is must of in an intertitle in the Buster Keaton film Steamboat Bill, Jr. (1928):
And in Josef von Sternberg’s 1928 The Docks of New York:
Over the last number of years, I’ve seen the non-standard of-form in many books by authors who presumably knew what they were doing:
‘I could of sworn I’d run into you some place before.’ (Carson McCullers, The Member of the Wedding)
‘Oh Miz, oh Miz,’ he moaned, rubbing his leg. ‘You shouldn’t of done that, you shouldn’t, you reely shouldn’t.’ (Sylvia Plath, The Bell Jar)
‘All bloody and mucked up, with figuring away aboard the Vénus, when two minutes would of changed it.’ (Patrick O’Brian, The Mauritius Command)
‘I’d of liked to be stabbed – and have lashings of red paint.’ (Agatha Christie, Dead Man’s Folly)
‘Never should of married‘ (Dylan Thomas, Under Milk Wood)
‘See, they must of had them already saddled.’ (Elmore Leonard, The Law at Randado)
‘If I hadn’t of got my tubes tied, it could of been me, say I was ten years younger.’ (Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale)
‘You could of just told him.’ (Raymond Chandler, The Long Good-bye)
‘You could of said no and I could of not believed you.’ (Raymond Chandler, The Long Good-bye)
‘She must of grabbed some pills.’ (Raymond Chandler, The Long Good-bye)
‘You ought to of asked for me in the first place.’ (Raymond Chandler, ‘Trouble Is My Business’, in Trouble Is My Business)
‘Maybe I had ought to of gone to the servant’s entrance.’ (Raymond Chandler, ‘Trouble Is My Business’, in Trouble Is My Business)
‘Youve never seen anything so mad, the lassie couldnt of known what kind of nut house she was in.’ (Alan Warner, Morvern Callar)
‘I don’t suppose he would remember you,’ the woman said thoughtfully. ‘Seems like he would of mentioned you sometimes if he did.’ (Shirley Jackson, ‘The Lie’, in Let Me Tell You)
‘He shouldn’t of done it, that’s all’ (Shirley Jackson, ‘Root of Evil’, in Let Me Tell You)
‘My wife,’ he said, putting his elbows on the counter and still watching Judith, ‘my wife, you ought to of heard her when she thought I was going.’ (Shirley Jackson, ‘Homecoming’, in Let Me Tell You)
‘If he’d of been a friend of mine you would have said plenty, believe me,” Mrs. Royster said darkly. (Shirley Jackson, ‘The Daemon Lover’)
‘She sure must of been glad to see him, the way he looked,’ the old man said. (Shirley Jackson, ‘The Daemon Lover’)
‘I never saw him,’ the clerk in the drugstore said. ‘I know because I would of noticed the flowers.’ (Shirley Jackson, ‘The Daemon Lover’)
‘If you had of been dead, you’d of had a funeral. I only just thought a that now. I’d of went along.’ (Claire Kilroy, The Devil I Know)
Mabey I shoudnt of let them oparate on my branes like she said if its agenst god. (Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon)
Now that makes me feel bad because I would never of hurt the baby. (Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon)
‘I should of had my head examined.’ (Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon)
‘She should of got it lit before we arrived.’ (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters)
‘Maybe you should of shot us when we was far away.’ (Chris Cleave, The Other Hand)
‘If he’d been an animal, he’d of been the runt of the litter and we’d of put him down.’ (Gillian Flynn, Dark Places)
‘I could of used the money,’ Donna said. ‘That’s what I was thinking.’ […] ‘It’s true,’ she said. ‘I could of used the money.’ (Raymond Carver, ‘Vitamins’, in Cathedral)
‘And here I’d of sworn…’ He took another try at the coffee cup, registered surprise to find it empty. (James Sallis, Drive)
‘Figured they must of took you when they took Ellis.’ (James Sallis, Bluebottle)
Must of been May 14 as May 12 is my birthday and it was by way of a late present. (Minette Walters, The Ice House)
‘You could of got it from the paper.’ (Minette Walters, The Sculptress)
‘You should of shown me this last time.’ (Minette Walters, The Sculptress)
‘She went guilty so she must of done it.’ (Minette Walters, The Sculptress)
Yorkin cringed. ‘Me. Pierce told me to clip him. I shouldn’t of done it by the drop.’ (James Ellroy, L. A. Confidential)
‘That sure could of been true,’ says the clerk at the Salon City store (Jon Krakauer, Into the Wild)
‘I must of fell asleep, eh?’
‘I guess you must have,’ said Isserley. (Michel Faber, Under the Skin)Then one day, it must of rained, and man discovered a new place: indoors. (Philomena Cunk, Cunk on Everything)
And where that monkey might of come from. (Philomena Cunk, Cunk on Everything)
I would of put loads more dinosaurs in. (Philomena Cunk, Cunk on Everything)
‘Donnie, we’d of finished this Betamax deal in ten days. And we’d have had winter money, all three of us.’ (Joseph D. Pistone with Richard Woodley, Donnie Brasco: My Undercover Life in the Mafia)
‘And who else could of built it?’ Mr Madden shouted. (Brian Moore, The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne)
Sheila, the woodshed, should of paddled you sooner. (Brian Moore, The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne)
‘You went had in there. Stark mad. You’d have raped her if . . .’
‘I’d of what?‘ (Brian Moore, The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne)‘I never should of come here.’ (Brian Moore, The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne)
‘Whether Miriam would of been any different, I don’t know, but I’d say she’d of been worse.’ (Patricia Highsmith, Strangers on a Train)
‘I’d of thought Mrs Herman was the last person in the world to—’ (Dashiell Hammett, The Dain Curse)
…the marshal hadn’t taken any of the Collinsons’ property though of course he might of. (Dashiell Hammett, The Dain Curse)
‘I wouldn’t of flagged that taxi if the For Hire flag hadn’t been up.’ (Dashiell Hammet, ‘Fly Paper’, in The Big Knockover and other stories)
”F he’d of been a man I’d of seen him in hell ‘fore I’d of gave it to him.’ (Dashiell Hammett, ‘Corkscrew’, in The Big Knockover and other stories)
‘They may of gone,’ he said slowly. (Dashiell Hammett, ‘The Golden Horseshoe’, in The Continental Op)
‘But he must of gone through the house and out front . . .’ (Dashiell Hammett, ‘The Girls with the Silver Eyes’, in The ContinentalOp)
‘Anybody could of got in them with a ladder.’ (Dashiell Hammett, ‘The Farewell Murder’, in The Continental Op)
‘Well, we would of if she hadn’t put the two X’s to me the same as she done to you’ . . . ‘but if my rod hadn’t of got snagged in my flogger you wouldn’t have seen nothing else.’ (Dashiell Hammett, ‘The Whosis Kid’, in The Continental Op)
‘If I’d known you five years ago I’d of given it to you.’ (Sara Paretsky, ‘The Maltese Cat’, in Windy City Blues)
‘Mate, I’ve probably said enough already. More than I should of (taps nose) . . . Professional conduct an’ all that.’ (Nicola Barker, Darkmans)
‘Yes, and if the bastard hadn’t of moved I’d have got him, too.’ (Alexander Masters, Stuart: A Life Backwards)
‘I’m Billy Baker. Your Daddy might of talked about me, called me Space?’ (Garth Ennis and Steve Dillon, Preacher) (pictured and quoted below: Preacher no. 2: Proud Americans)
”Cause I hope I ain’t outta line here, but I think he’d of been cool about you hearin’ it…’ (Garth Ennis and Steve Dillon, Preacher)
‘He was stupid an’ clumsy an’ kind of a weakling, an’ he wouldn’t of lasted a fuckin’ day over there if it hadn’t been for one thing’ (Garth Ennis and Steve Dillon, Preacher)
‘See, we’d of done Murphy there an’ then, we’d of had to do Van Patten as well — an’ I knew your Daddy didn’t really wanna do that.’ (Garth Ennis and Steve Dillon, Preacher)
The Dunns must of felt this when Tracy vanished. (Octavia E. Butler, Parable of the Sower)
‘She must of really gotten knocked out.’ (Jonathan Lethem, Girl in Landscape)
‘He’s not around now, or you’d of met him.’ (Jonathan Lethem, Girl in Landscape)
‘They could of just been losing us,’ said Coney. (Jonathan Lethem, Motherless Brooklyn)
‘Your parents must of been hippies,’ he’d tell me. (Jonathan Lethem, Motherless Brooklyn)
‘He might of been a little impatient for his date with Frank.’ (Jonathan Lethem, Motherless Brooklyn)
‘If it weren’t for Gilbert I would of told him to stick it—’ (Jonathan Lethem, Motherless Brooklyn)
‘Oh, I’d of straightened it out,’ Tony said. (Jonathan Lethem, Motherless Brooklyn)
‘Each one of them, he says it might of been you, it might of been two other guys.’ (Robert Anton Wilson, The Universe Next Door)
‘You must of been back on the reservation eating peyote again.’ (Robert Anton Wilson, The Universe Next Door)
‘And it wouldn’t of mattered to me whether you did or did not like women.’ (George Pelecanos, Drama City)
‘I wouldn’t of thought of such a thing in a million years.’ (George Pelecanos, The Big Blowdown)
‘If you hadn’t of stepped in the middle of everything—’ (George Pelecanos, The Big Blowdown)
It would of done no good gettin’ somebody else te scratch it for me because that was a sin as well. (Frances Molloy, No Mate for the Magpie)
‘Been calling all night. Four, five calls, must of been.’ (Lawrence Block, A Ticket to the Boneyard)
‘Six-thirty or so, you must of just got on your way to Maspeth, guy goes out back with a load of kitchen garbage.’ (Lawrence Block, A Dance at the Slaughterhouse)
‘Another minute and I would of made it, you rats.’ (Lawrence Block, No Score)
‘Now if you would of done this we wouldn’t have any trouble.’ (Lawrence Block, No Score)
‘Need a social security card,’ he said. ‘You must of had one, I guess.’ (Lawrence Block, Chip Harrison Scores Again)
‘Guess they must of been chafing you some on that bus ride.’ (Lawrence Block, Chip Harrison Scores Again)
‘You might not of noticed yesterday but he’s only got one hand.’ (Ron Rash, The Cove)
‘Would he of died?’ (Alison Bechdel, Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic)
‘Pete should of told me,’ he said. (Donald Westlake, Good Behavior)
‘Okay,’ Dortmunder said. ‘Could be worse. She could of been wearing her habit, right?’ (Donald Westlake, Good Behavior)
‘Wound up, it took him forty-eight years to serve a ten-year sentence that he should of got out in three.’ (Donald Westlake, Good Behavior)
‘She has on a pair of bikinis I couldn’t of got into when I was ten years old.’ (Elmore Leonard, Mr. Paradise)
‘We could’ve settled, the city pays out a few bucks, it wouldn’t of cost you a dime.’ (Elmore Leonard, Mr. Paradise)
‘You know what I sor?’ said the child patiently. ‘Well, the train must of stopped, see, and some little men with bundles on their backs got on.’ (Mavis Gallant, ‘Up North’, in The Omnibus of 20th Century Ghost Stories, edited by Robert Phillips)
‘You two might of settled down and had a nice baby or something.’ (John Kennedy Toole, A Confederacy of Dunces)
‘Maybe you should of looked around some more.’ (John Kennedy Toole, A Confederacy of Dunces)
‘He must of gone to the show.’ (John Kennedy Toole, A Confederacy of Dunces)
‘I shouldn’t of toog you id,’ Angelo breathed. ‘I got nerbous.’
‘It was all my fault,’ Mrs Reilly said, ‘for trying to protect that Ignatius. I should of let you lock him away, Angelo.’ (John Kennedy Toole, A Confederacy of Dunces)‘I don’t think I’d of wanted to go down there even for the Grape-Nuts. But maybe if we’d’ve gone real fast . . .’ (Harlan Ellison, ‘Sensible City’, in The Dead that Walk, edited by Stephen Jones)
‘You could of killed someone!’ (Neil Gaiman, Death: The High Cost of Living)
‘There’s a lot of places round here you could of bin.’ (Neil Gaiman, Death: The High Cost of Living)
‘If she’d stuck around, I could of asked her advice. I bet she could of come up with somewhere to put you that no one would think of lookin’, not if you paid them ready money.’ (Neil Gaiman, Death: The High Cost of Living)
‘If you’d gotten into a fight with that swordarm of yours, there’d of been bodies all over’ (Kazuo Koike and Goseki Kojima, Lone Wolf and Cub, vol. 2: The Gateless Barrier, translated by Dana Lewis)
‘It ain’t right I wasn’t there because if I had of been there I would of known.’ (Flannery O’Connor, A Good Man is Hard to Find)’The other vics probably would have lived if Lewin hadn’t of made that play.’ (George Pelecanos, Shame the Devil)
‘I should of thought of that my own self.’ (George Pelecanos, Shame the Devil)
‘If you’d gone in right away, you would of got him, none of this would of happened. . . . I’d of got off! You think I’d of stood around that roadblock for seven hours?’ (Richard Stark, Slayground)
‘That guy talks pretty big, Cory. We should of called his bluff right there.’ (Richard Stark, Ask the Parrot)
‘Everything screws up, it just gets worse and worse, we should never of got into this, we’re fuckups, that’s all, we’re just fuckups.’ (Richard Stark, Comeback)
‘Might of slipped in and out, nobody the wiser, except we were already on the scene, account of Parmitt being gone.’ (Richard Stark, Flashfire)
‘Couldn’t you of – oh, he was ignorant in his speech – couldn’t you of prevented it?’ (Hilary Mantel, Beyond Black)
‘I should of thought to bring a sun lounger, from the garden centre,’ Mart said. (Hilary Mantel, Beyond Black)
‘He could of been,’ her mother said vaguely. (Hilary Mantel, Beyond Black)
When she provoked him and he was in a temper with her, he would say, count your blessings, girl, you fink I’m bad but you could of had MacArthur. You could have had Bob Fox, or Aitkenside, or Pikey Pete. You could have had my mate Keef Capstick. You could of had Nick, and then where’d you be? (Hilary Mantel, Beyond Black)
He shouldn’t of been near enough . . . (Donal Ryan, ‘Aisling’, in A Slanting of the Sun)
Stupid idea anyway I dont think he ever wud of really done it. (Paul Murray, The Bee Sting – this example is from a teenager’s text message)
But if she hadn’t of drank she would never have seen him at all and better that she was there she thought where she could at least try to keep some grip on him before he lost the run of himself completely (Paul Murray, The Bee Sting)
Lar thought about it They must of gone out on a job he said (Paul Murray, The Bee Sting)
I wonder what kind of life you might have had, if you hadn’t of been dragged back here. (Paul Murray, The Bee Sting)
I paid a man to write it he says He must of never sent it at all (Paul Murray, The Bee Sting)
I wish someone had of told me you croak into his shoulder (Paul Murray, The Bee Sting)
Lars frowns Choosing his words He didn’t think you should of married Dickie he says (Paul Murray, The Bee Sting)
U SHUD OF TOLD ME I CUD OF SHOWD U AROUD!!!! (Paul Murray, The Bee Sting, text message)
‘Hell, if I knew I was sitting on a gold mine, I’d of sold ’em a long time ago.’ (Jim Dodge, Not Fade Away)
‘And he couldn’t of loved me because he took away my kid, he’s off someplace where I can’t never see him.’ (James Baldwin, Another Country)
‘But I would of died for my kid, I wouldn’t never of let anything happen to him.’ (James Baldwin, Another Country)
‘I couldn’t of done nothing else,’ he cried, ‘what else could I of done? Where could I of gone with Esther, and me a preacher, too? And what could I of done with you?’ (James Baldwin, Go Tell It on the Mountain)
‘Must of had a heart attack or something!?’ (Jamie Hewlett and Alan Martin, Tank Girl One):
A curious example in Jim Nesbit’s novel Lethal Injection, where a character says “would’ve of”. My first thought was that it was a copy-editing or proofreading fix that stopped halfway: changing “would of” to “would’ve” and neglecting to delete the “of”. But a search online shows occasional analogous examples in unedited writing, and adjacent discussion on Language Log, so it may well be authentically dialectal:
The example below, from alt-manga historian Ryan Holmberg’s The Translator Without Talent, is from The Marvel Times, a pretend-newspaper about comics that he created on his twelfth birthday. So its must of is probably not deliberate and also completely forgivable:
Such phrases appear often in Cormac McCarthy’s novels. Here are some from Cities of the Plain, all used in dialogue:
You’d never of knowed it though.
I wouldn’t of wrote home for nothin.
Looks like they’d of learned to stay out of it.
Johnny if he hadnt of found that girl would of found somethin else.
And there was nothin any mortal man could of done to of stopped it.
And from Blood Meridian:
No, No, he said. I mean ye was lost to of come here.
It might of been a mule.
Somebody ought to of pickled it a long time ago.
Must of been a thousand indians in there all settin around.
He appears to of spoke for hisself.
I couldnt of learned it off ten dutchmen.
Him and the governor they sat up till breakfast and it was Paris this and London that in five languages, you’d of give something to of heard them.
Don’t you know he’d of took you with him? He’d of took you, boy.
Glanton spat. Ort to of shot that one too, he said.
Well, he said. I’d of thought any damn fool could saw the barrels off a shotgun.
That old boy you bought them off of might of said they was injins but that dont make it so.
The man didnt answer.
Them ears could of come off of cannibals . . .You wouldnt of lived anyway, the man said.
And from All the Pretty Horses:
They might as well of, he said.
Otherwise I’d of been born in Alabama.
…it was a mistake not to of told you.
But if it hadnt of been for her I wouldnt of made it.
He might well could of
Might well could of is also a nice example of a double modal. The [modal]-of construction is used frequently throughout Chris Cleave’s remarkable novel Incendiary:
She was like that was Mena. Philosophical. I’d definitely of killed myself if it hadn’t of been for her.
If you could of looked in my eyes you’d of seen the same thing I shouldn’t wonder.
I wouldn’t of come near you I’d never of let you touch me you should be ashamed.
Most notably in this exchange between two people only one of whom uses it dialectally:
– He would of said something.
– Maybe he wouldn’t have.
– Wouldn’t you of?A remarkable example in A Gate at the Stairs by Lorrie Moore uses it without a preceding modal, in the speech of a young child:
‘You got brown eyes,’ she said. ‘I of brown eyes.’
Searching the Corpus of Contemporary American English for the string would of [v*], where [v*] is a verb, produces the graph below. It shows that the of-form’s predominant setting is fiction, usually ‘would of been’, and it also shows up in transcription of actual speech, as in the academic and newspaper instances. You can click through the image to view examples, sources, and further information at COCA.
The magazine data are false positives (‘we’d have a better chance of achieving a breakthrough in quantum gravity than we would of figuring out how to reliably connect with teenagers’), but you get an idea of the construction’s low frequency and particular genre distribution.
Plotting could of [v*] usages over time, using the related Corpus of Historical American English, suggests the construction may have peaked. Or is that just wishful thinking? Again, you can click on this graph for details, or open it in another tab.
Of 1000 occurrences of could/would of in the Oxford English Corpus, about 850 are from ‘representations of direct speech (mostly from the Fiction domain, but also from interviews and courtroom transcripts)’. That leaves 150 genuine written instances of could/would of, compared with 4 million examples of standard could/would have. I can’t help picturing a global battalion of editors keeping it firmly at bay.
The of-form is not frequent in edited prose, but it appears quite often in casual writing and it has been around a while. Does that count for much? MWDEU says its prolonged use has ‘not made it respectable’, and recommends avoiding it – including in transcriptions of real speech, since ’ve serves the purpose equally well. I agree, and I think if someone explicitly says of, and stresses it, that might warrant a ‘[sic]’.
Regular readers know I like to make room for literary effect and poetic licence, but I have never warmed to this mistake. Every time I see it – be its use naive or intentional – I want to fix it. Authenticity of dialect and character are all well and good, but I think the main effect of the deliberate usage in edited prose is further uncertainty and error (not to mention irritation, in some quarters). What do you think?
Updates:
Years after writing this, I’ve softened considerably on the modal-of construction. This is partly because of exposure to its use by so many great writers, and also because it’s a good example of language change – a natural, essential characteristic of a living language. See my post on reconciling descriptivism with editing for more discussion.
I’ve come across many more examples in books, and have added them to the sets above and below. @desktopenglish on Twitter drew my attention to this BBC article that quotes a footballer saying he ‘Shouldn’t of reacted the way I did’.
What sounds to me like a good audio example comes from author Zadie Smith on the Adam Buxton Podcast. This link should cue the player automatically at 15:50, but if it doesn’t, that’s the time stamp. The relevant exchange is as follows, discussing Smith’s father:
Smith: He was very uptight about time, yeah.
Buxton: It rubbed off on you.
Smith: It must of, yeah.
Medievalist Lucy Allen found the line ‘For methowte I wold not for my life a sen it fallen’ in a 14thC religious text, The Shewings of Julian of Norwich. Translating it as ‘I thought I would not for my life of seen it fall’ [underlines mine], she writes: ‘it’s always fun when you notice something in a medieval text that is a dead ringer for one of the “modern” mistakes that horrify the pearl-clutchers’.
David Crystal adds further historical commentary in his book Making Sense: The Glamorous Story of English Grammar:
On 5 September 1819 the poet John Keats sends an apologetic letter to his publisher John Taylor, in which he writes:
Had I known of your illness I should not of written in such fierry phrase in my first Letter.
‘Should not of written’? From such a great poet? It must have been just a slip, because later on in the same letter he writes ‘You should not have delayed.’ What interests me is to find this confusion 200 years ago. It isn’t just a modern thing, as some critics say. That identity in pronunciation between the preposition of and the unstressed form of the auxiliary verb have has been around a long time.
Morph, a linguistics blog by the Surrey Morphology Group at the University of Surrey, has a great post on different aspects of the modal-of usage: ‘What’s the good of “would of”?’
Lots of examples in Anne Tyler’s If Morning Ever Comes, spoken by several different characters (of different ages, backgrounds, and ethnicities):
‘You mustn’t of been but twelve or so but I remembered.’
‘You shouldn’t of mentioned breakfast, boy,’ he said.
‘Course I think he could of made a better choice in wives, but then Sally’s right pretty and I reckon I can see his point in picking her.’
‘You know, when I was a boy we’d of been plumb through town by now.’
‘If we’d of known,’ she said, ‘I’d of cleaned up house a little.’
‘Folks tell me I take too good care of him, so it can’t of been that he got too cold. Though he is right much of a puddle-wader, that could’ve done it.’ [Note nearby use of could’ve.]
‘I don’t guess my letter would of made any change in him one way or the other.’
‘If I’d of married Jamie,” she said, “I would of had a different family.’
‘Well, if it hadn’t of been her, it’d been someone else.’
‘She mustn’t of seen us.’
Ross Macdonald also makes regular use of the construction:
‘If they knew they had a buyer, they might of stayed in business to accommodate you.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Blue Hammer)
‘I wish I could of died instead of him.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Blue Hammer)
‘The other man took them, he must of.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Galton Case)
‘He must of got away.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Galton Case)
‘He must of fell down on the knife and stabbed himself.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Galton Case)
‘He would of killed him too.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Galton Case)
‘When Culligan came marching out, armed up to the teeth, you could of knocked me over with a ‘dozer.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Galton Case)
‘Lucky for him I was out, or I’d of shown him what’s what.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Galton Case)
‘You were just a tiny baby, but that wouldn’t of stopped him.’ (Ross Macdonald, The Galton Case)
As does Elmore Leonard; these are from The Hot Kid:
Emmett Long kept looking at him. ‘You had a gun you’d of shot me, huh?’
‘I’d of shoved the ice cream cone up his goddamn nose.’
What Oris did, he got mad, changed the name of the company from Busy Bee Oil & Gas – a cartoon bumblebee in the trademark they’d of had one day – to NMD Oil & Gas, standing for No More Dusters, and worked a year as a driller to restore his capital.
‘The only one I told was Emmett,’ Carl said. ‘It had to of been Crystal told the papers.’
She had to wonder if she had been here would he of recognized her, and bet he would’ve.
‘I’d of arrested him he’s walking in the door,’ Lester said.
Franklin was shaking his head. ‘I’d of seen ’em.’
‘I told him he shouldn’t of left the key in it.’
‘She looked at him again with a faint smile. ‘I would never of suspected.’
‘The first remark out of his mouth, I’d of pulled and killed him where he stood.’
‘She’d of given me the choice of taking a chance with Teddy or being locked up.’
‘She wouldn’t of started breakfast if they weren’t all downstairs near ready to eat.’
‘Jack’s a talker,’ Carl said. ‘He’d of thought of a reason to go alone, pick up a bottle? And Tony’s polite, he would’ve said don’t steal the car, okay?’
‘No, he couldn’t of known that.’
‘Jack Belmont wouldn’t of left with bullets in his gun.’
The minute Jack wasn’t looking, like taking a leak or something, she’d of run out of the house to find a cop.
But Nancy knew who he was, so so the kidnapping wouldn’t of worked.
‘If I hadn’t decided to step back inside to answer the phone, I’d of missed one of the great opportunities of my career as a journalist . . .’
Richard Stark, already quoted above, has half a dozen examples in his first novel, The Hunter:
The spelling occurs often in Kent Haruf’s novel Plainsong:‘If Art wanted to see you, he’d of told you where to find him.’
Stegman blinked. ‘He must of believed me.’
‘His wife must of known it, but she never told me.’
‘Five minutes later,’ the owner told him, ‘you’d of been out of luck.’
‘…it must of meant something, that’s all.’
‘I wouldn’t of believed it.’
He should of taken it last year.
She might of come down and gone back, Ike said. She might not of too.
She must not of stuck.
She must of went home, Mr. Guthrie.
You shouldn’t even of touched that.
Well, he might of went to Denver, Raymond said. Then he might of went back to the Rosebud in South Dakota.
I should of called during these months, I know.
You could of done something yourself too, you know, he said.
Something must of happened to her, Harold said. She must of got taken off or something.
I can’t think of anything we might of did.
You don’t even know where he might of took her for sure.
He might of landed her in Pueblo or Walsenburg.We didn’t know what we might of done to cause you to want to leave here like that.
He better not of hurt her permanent, Raymond said.
And in Pete Dexter’s novel Train:
“They must of left the sprinklers on all night,” the fat man said after he got back in control of his deportment again.
“He must of got home somehow,” Train said.
“She all convulsed the whole time they going through the house; she keeps saying, ‘Oh, no, he couldn’t of did that….'”
Train began thinking more and more that the world might of decided to let him alone.
Now he thought about he, she might not of even noticed the table leg if he hadn’t dropped it and woke up the dog…
Train thought it must of reminded him of that feeling when he was hit by that car and rolled across the road.
Then, if it was the right officer, they might of just carted Mayflower out of there, just because she was pretty, and then took his ass out into the desert and left it.
“One of them must of got up here and took it,” he said.
It seemed like Mr. Cooper must of told him where he come from, or how else would he know?
Must of bought his clothes in the boy’s department.
Melrose might of been trying to say something too, and Train distinctly saw his jaw slide out from under his face.
It came to Train the Plural must of heard her before she even come out of the double-wide, that he must of known from how she was walking that she was mad.
“A blind man,” he said, “We should of sold tickets.”
Walter Tevis’s The Hustler, from multiple characters:
‘You should never of quit going to Sunday school.’
‘I already watched you lose – watched you lose to a man you should of beat.’
‘And if I hadn’t already paid for it I could of with the money I won in side bets.’
‘They couldn’t of helped but hear of me.’
‘I should of let that guy quit, Charlie, like you told me.’
#books #corpusLinguistics #couldOf #dialects #dialogue #etymology #eyeDialect #fiction #grammar #language #linguistics #literacy #modalVerbs #modals #phrases #reading #schwa #speech #speechErrors #spelling #transcription #typos #usage #verbs #writing
-
Here is a list of the 150+ no-body zionists who tried to get #bisanOwda's Emmy nom tossed; none of whom I care about whatsoever:
Ari Ingel, Executive Director, Creative Community for Peace
David Renzer, Former Chairman/CEO Universal Music Publishing Group, CCFP Chairman & Co-Founder
Steve Schnur, Worldwide Executive & Music President, Electronic Arts, CCFP Co-Founder
Rakefet Abergel, Actor/Director, Cyclamen Films
Orly Adelson, Former President of ITV Studios, America
Marty Adelstein, CEO, Tomorrow Studios
Anne-Marie Asner, Co-Founder, Animation Israel
Jeff Astrof, TV Producer/Showrunner, Other Shoe Productions
Michael Auerbach, Partner, Jackoway Austen Tyerman Wertheimer Mandelbaum Morris Bernstein Trattner Auerbach Hynick Jaime LeVine Sample & Klein
Dean Bahat, Attorney, Ziffren Brittenham
Andrea Ballas, VP Comms, CBS
Jackie Barrie, A&R Manager
Richard Baskind, Partner & Head of Music, Simons Muirhead & Burton
Aton Ben-Horin, Executive VP of Global A&R, Atlantic Records Group
Steven Bensusan, President, Blue Note Entertainment Group
Adam Berkowitz, Founder and President, Lenore Entertainment Group
Sharon Bialy, Casting Director, Bialy/Thomas & Associates
Josh Binder, Co-Founder and Partner, Rothenberg Mohr & Binder, LLP
Neil Blair, Founding Partner, The Blair Partnership
Selma Blair, Actress, Author, Advocate, Sainted Productions
Rebecca Blumberg, SVP Ad Sales, Paramount
Evan Bogart, Songwriter & CEO, Seeker Music
Benjamin Budde, CEO, Budde Group GmbH
Bruce Burger, Producer, RebbeSoul
David Byrnes, Attorney, Ziffren Brittenham
Civia Caroline, Social Impact Consultant, CLiC Impact
Pamela Charbit, Director of A&R, Warner Music Group
Emmanuelle Chriqui, Actor, Yellow Ray Entertainment
Leanne Coronel, Talent Manager, The Coronel Group
Raye Cosbert, Managing Director, Metropolis Music
Paul Craig, Ceo, Nostromo Management
Doug Davis, NATAS Member, 2x Emmy winner, The Davis Firm
Rebecca De Mornay, Actor
Jamie Denbo, Co-Executive Producer, Grey’s Anatomy, ABC/Disney
Josh Deutsch, Chairman/CEO, Premier Music Group
Avi Diamond, Director, Film/TV Sync, Warner Music Canada
Craig Dorfman, President and Owner, Frontline MGMT
Rachel Douglas, Manager, Range Media Partners
David Draiman, Frontman, Disturbed
Jeremy Drysdale, Screenwriter, bigbamboo
Craig Emanuel, Ryan Murphy Productions
Hannah Epstein, Agent, CAA
Rami “Kosha dillz” Even-Esh, Rapper/Comic/Actor
Lindsay Fabes, Actor
Ron Fair, Record Producer & CEO, Faircraft Inc.
Sharon Farber, Composer, Score by Score Music
Danny Federman, Owner, Maccabi Tel Aviv Basketball Club
Eric Feig, Attorney and TV Academy Member, Feig/Finkel
Patti Felker, Attorney, Felker Toczek Suddleson McGinnis Ryan LLP
Ken Fermaglich, Partner, United Talent Agency
Ross “Remedy” Filler, Artist
Shalom Fisch, President, MediaKidz Research & Consulting
David Fishof, CEO, RRFC Films, LLC
Siri Garber, Publicist, Platform
David Gardner, President, Artists First
Barbara Garshman, CEO, Garshman Productions LLC
Gary Gersh
Gary Ginsberg, Senior VP, SoftBank Group Corp.
David Glick, Founder & CEO, Edge Group
Zusha Goldin, Celebrity Photographer, Zusha Goldin
Michael Goldwasser, President, Easy Star Records
Andrew Gould, President, Music Publishing
Scott Greenberg, Partner, LBI
Steven Greenberg, Founder and President, S-Curve Records
Daniel Grindlinger, Writer
Ronnie Harris, Partner, Harris & Trotter
Michael Hirschhorn, Manager, Streaming and Sales, Atlantic Records
Linda Edell Howard, Attorney, Novick Law
Rich Ingram, Artist/Creator
Neil Jacobson, Former President, Geffen Records, Founder & CEO of Hallwood Media
Michael Kaplan, Writer/Producer
Sam Katz, Music Manager, Homebase MGMT, LLC
Zach Katz, CEO & Co-Founder, Fixated
Ketura Kestin, Film Producer, Serendipity Productions
Amanda Kogan, Manager, Aaron Kogan Management
Keetgi Kogan Steinberg, Writer/Producer/Showrunner
Jason Kozel, Creative Executive, Range Media Partners
Rick Krim, CEO, Krim Music + Media
Evan Lamberg, President, North America, Universal Music Publishing Group
Sherry Lansing, Former CEO, Paramount Pictures
Colin Lester OBE, Founder/Chairman, JEM Music Group
Sean Liebowitz, Agent
Koura Linda, Founder & CEO, Space Dream Productions
Marci Liroff, Intimacy Coordinator/Casting Director
Cory Litwin, Managing Partner, Range Media Partners
David Lonner, CEO, The David Lonner Company
Ben Maddahi, President, Unrestricted Publishing & Mgmt
Gabriel Mann, Composer
Deborah Marcus, Executive, CAA Foundation
Susan Markheim, Full Stop Mgt., The Azoff Company
Amanda Markowitz, Actor/Producer, SAG/AFTRA & PGA
Orly Marley, President, Tuff Gong Worldwide
Devra Maza, Screenwriter
Debra Messing, Actor/Producer
Hilary Michael, Agent and Partner, WME
Beth Milstein, Writer
Jennifer Morrow, Actor, CAA
Patrick Moss, Writer, Moroccan Boychik
Robert Munic, Writer/Showrunner, Pull The Pin Productions, Inc.
Lisa Nupoff, Manager, iminmusic management
Scott Packman, Founder and Managing Member, SSP Partners LLC
Mark Pinkus, President, Rhino Records
Jonah Platt, Actor/Producer
Wendy Plaut, SVP Music & Celebrity Talent, Paramount Global
Jessica Poter, Writer, Gustavo Anibal Productions
Brian Ralston, Composer/Producer, Studio 74 Music, LLC
Golan Ramraz, Writer/Producer, EGX Film Factory
Bruce Resnikoff
Frederic Richter, Producer, Writer & Researcher
Wendy Robbins, Executive Producer, Creators Inc
Dan Rosen, President, Warner Music Australasia
Rick Rosen, Co-Founder, Endeavor, WME
Aaron Rosenberg, Partner, Myman Greenspan Fox Rosenberg Mobasser Younger & Light
Gregg Rossen, Screenwriter
Michael Rotenberg, CEO, 3 Arts Entertainment
Joshua Rothstein, CEO/Founder, Ice Cream For Dinner
Haim Saban, Chairman and CEO, Saban Capital Group
Glenn Sanders, Writer/Director/Creative Director, Masonry Creative
Ayelet Schiffman, SVP Head of Promotions, Island Records
Paul Schindler, Senior Partner, Greenberg Traurig LLC
Jordan Schur, CEO and Chairman, Mimran Schur Pictures and Suretone Entertainment
Adam Schwartz, Writer
Sam Schwartz, Partner, Gorfaine/Schwartz Agency
Jay Schweid, Founder/CEO, ephelants/Village
Adam Segal, President, The 2050 Group
Ben Silverman, Chairman and Co-CEO, Propagate Content
Ralph Simon, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Mobilium Global Limited
Tamar Simon, Owner/CEO, Mean Streets Management
Martin Singer, Attorney, Lavely and Singer
Halle Stanford, President of Television, The Jim Henson Company
Mimi Steinberg, Writer/Producer
Jonathan Steinsapir, Partner, Kinsella Holley Iser Kump Steinsapir
Gary Stiffelman, Founder, GSS Law
Traci Symanski, CEO, Co-Star Entertainment
Aaron Symonds, Film Composer
Fernando Szew, President, Fox Entertainment
Tal Tavin, Actor
Adam Taylor, President, APM Music
Michael Testa, Casting Director, Michael Testa Casting
Fred Toczek, Partner, Felker Toczek Suddleson Abramson McGinnis Ryan LLP
Eric Tuchman, Writer/Producer, MGM-TV
Noa Vinshtok, Streaming, Range Media Partners
Joshua Washington, International Recording Artist, JoDavi Music LLC
Avi Weider, Filmmaker, Loop Filmworks
Jon Weinbach, President, Skydance Sports
Nola Weinstein, Tech Executive
Ilana Wernick, Writer/Producer, Fox
Modi Wiczyk, Co-Founder, MRC
Evan Winiker, Managing Partner, Range Music
Seth Yanklewitz, Casting Director, Yanklewitz Pollack Casting
Sharon Tal Yguado, Founder & CEO, Astrid Entertainment
Ky Zaretsky, Manager, Range Media Partners
David Zedeck, Global Co-Head of Music
Additional Signers Include:
Doug Ellin, Director
Danielle Solzman, Film Critic, Solzy at the Movies
Michael Perlmutter, Music Supervisor, Instinct Ent.
Ross Buckley, Sr. Business Development Manager, Prime Video
Sammy Scher, Film & TV Producer
Dana Landman, Manager
Bradley Fischer, Film Producer
David Kohan, Television Writer/Producer, KoMut Entertainment
Amanda Markowitz, Producer/Actor, PGA/SAG-AFTRA
Jordan Glickson, VP, Music & Talent, Vevo
Brandon Farbstein, Creator & Host, Ten Feet Tall LLC
Hannah Epstein, Agent, CAA
Chiara Simmons, Writer, Script Supervisor, Fremantle
Ronli Tzour, VP, Marketing, FAE grprr
Samantha Fetner, Publicist
Katie Walder, Actress
Leslie Schapira, Writer/Producer, CBS
Melissa Zukerman, Managing Partner, PCG
Avram Kaplan, Producer, Mase Kaplan Produtions, Inc.
Daniel Alcheh, Composer, KeyChain Music
A.M. Driver, SAG/AFTRA Actress, VO Artist, Producer
Cara Wodnicki, Founder, CSW Publicity
Jay Schweid, Founder / CEO, ephelants/Village
Sammy Horowitz, Film/TV Writer
Kate Cohen, Producer, Straight Up Films
Jeff Rabhan, Founder, CEO, Bored of Ed
David Wachtenheim, Director
Steven Gordon, Episode Director, Wild Canary
Michael Kaufman, Producer/Manager, 5X Media
James Burrows, Director
-
What are you watching tonight?
.
July 21, 1990. Malcolm-Jamal Warner from NBC's The Cosby Show; David Faustino from Fox's Married...with Children; Neil Patrick Harris from ABC's Doogie Howser, M.D.; Alyssa Milano from ABC's Who's the Boss
.
#MalcolmJamalWarner #TheCosbyShow #DavidFaustino #MarriedwithChildren #NeilPatrickHarris #DoogieHowserMD #AlyssaMilano #WhostheBoss #television #tvshow #tv #tvguide #retro #vintage -
What are you watching tonight?
.
July 21, 1990. Malcolm-Jamal Warner from NBC's The Cosby Show; David Faustino from Fox's Married...with Children; Neil Patrick Harris from ABC's Doogie Howser, M.D.; Alyssa Milano from ABC's Who's the Boss
.
#MalcolmJamalWarner #TheCosbyShow #DavidFaustino #MarriedwithChildren #NeilPatrickHarris #DoogieHowserMD #AlyssaMilano #WhostheBoss #television #tvshow #tv #tvguide #retro #vintage -
What are you watching tonight?
.
July 21, 1990. Malcolm-Jamal Warner from NBC's The Cosby Show; David Faustino from Fox's Married...with Children; Neil Patrick Harris from ABC's Doogie Howser, M.D.; Alyssa Milano from ABC's Who's the Boss
.
#MalcolmJamalWarner #TheCosbyShow #DavidFaustino #MarriedwithChildren #NeilPatrickHarris #DoogieHowserMD #AlyssaMilano #WhostheBoss #television #tvshow #tv #tvguide #retro #vintage -
What are you watching tonight?
.
July 21, 1990. Malcolm-Jamal Warner from NBC's The Cosby Show; David Faustino from Fox's Married...with Children; Neil Patrick Harris from ABC's Doogie Howser, M.D.; Alyssa Milano from ABC's Who's the Boss
.
#MalcolmJamalWarner #TheCosbyShow #DavidFaustino #MarriedwithChildren #NeilPatrickHarris #DoogieHowserMD #AlyssaMilano #WhostheBoss #television #tvshow #tv #tvguide #retro #vintage -
LISTA | Filmes e séries baseadas em quadrinhos que chegarão em 2026
2026 vai ser um ano eletrizante para fãs de adaptações de quadrinhos, com uma mistura de filmes e séries que prometem agitar tanto cinemas quanto plataformas de streaming. No cinema, a DC segue com seu novo Universo Compartilhado, enquanto a Marvel iniciará sua mais grande conclusão épica até agora.
Confira a seguir os títulos mais aguardados do ano:
LISTA | Filmes que chegarão aos cinemas em 2026
Vale lembrar: assim como sempre acontece, algumas datas de estreia podem ser alteradas pelas distribuidoras ao longo do calendário.
Magnum (Wonder Man)
Criação: Destin Daniel Cretton, Andrew Guest
Estúdio: Marvel Studios (Television), Family Owned, Onyx Collective, Disney
Estreia: 27 de janeiro de 2026O ano de 2026 da Marvel começa já em janeiro com o lançamento de “Wonder Man” ou como é conhecido no Brasil “Magnum“, a 17ª série de televisão do Universo Cinematográfico Marvel (MCU), produzida pela Marvel Studios através de seu selo Marvel Television. A série também é produzida pela Family Owned e Onyx Collective.
Nesta minissérie de oito episódios criada por Destin Daniel Cretton e Andrew Guest, acompanhamos Simon Williams — vivido por Yahya Abdul-Mateen II — um ator frustrado e cheio de ambições que vai de rejeições em audições até a chance de uma vida: interpretar o icônico Wonder Man numa nova versão do filme de super-herói dos anos 1970.
O showrunner Andrew Guest descreveu o personagem como “incrivelmente poderoso de uma forma que nem ele mesmo tem plena consciência”, com o executivo da Marvel Studios, Brian Gay, acrescentando que Simon “nem sabe a extensão de seus poderes”, embora ambos tenham observado que o personagem não se importa de ter poderes e simplesmente quer ser um ator de sucesso como Daniel Day-Lewis.
Abdul-Mateen explicou que Simon esconde seus poderes porque eles são malvistos na Hollywood ficcional do MCU. O personagem permitiu que ele explorasse “alguma tridimensionalidade” entre seu passado e seu relacionamento com a família, enquanto ainda era um super-herói.
Ben Kingsley retorna como Trevor Slattery, ator que fracassado que anteriormente assumiu a identidade do Mandarim , trabalhando para Aldrich Killian em Homem de Ferro 3, e que mais tarde foi sequestrado pela organização Dez Anéis de Xu Wenwu em Shang-Chi e a Lenda dos Déz Anéis, que também está fazendo testes para o filme do Wonder Man.
Slattery retorna a Hollywood após o rompimento com o Mandarim e os Dez Anéis para encontrar uma “segunda chance” como ator e provar à sua mãe, Dorothy, que ele era “o ator que [ela] sempre esperou que ele fosse”, com o Wonder Man mostrando Slattery assumindo a responsabilidade por seu comportamento passado.
Guest chamou Slattery de um “personagem tipo Forrest Gump , tipo Chauncey Gardiner ” que consegue se “envolver em coisas maiores”. O produtor executivo e presidente da Marvel Television, Brad Winderbaum disse que o personagem tinha uma “estrutura de três atos muito interessante” dentro da série, que era “muito sincera, muito séria [e] não cínica”, com Kingsley acrescentando que Slattery é “puxado em duas direções”, incluindo a busca por sua ambição, mas “a um custo terrível”.
O elenco ainda conta com Arian Moayed como P. Cleary, um agente do Departamento de Controle de Danos, Zlatko Burić como Von Kovak, diretor célebre que está dirigindo o remake de Wonder Man, Demetrius Grosse como Eric Williams/Ceifador, o irmão mais velho “estável” de Simon, X Mayo, Olivia Thirlby, Byron Bowers, Josh Gad, Lauren Glazier, Béchir Sylvain, Manny McCord, Simon Templeman, Joe Pantoliano,Dane Larsen, Phumzile Sitole, Jere Burns e Ed Harris como o agente de Simon, Neal Saroyan.
“Magnum” é descrito como autoconsciente e metalinguístico, uma sátira que comenta, com humor e sensibilidade, sobre a própria cultura dos super-heróis e a saturação do gênero, sem perder de vista a jornada humana de seus protagonistas.
“Magnum” (Wonder Man) estreia com todos os oito episódios em 27 de janeiro no catálogo do Disney+.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j4NvyIHCs0
Invencível (Invincible) – 4ª temporada
Criação: Robert Kirkman
Estúdio: Amazon MGM Studios, Wind Sun Sky Entertainment, Skybound Animation, Point Grey Pictures,
Estreia: Março de 2026Agora, com a quarta temporada da série animada “Invencível (Invincible) chegando em março de 2026 ao Prime Video, parece que a série está pronta para elevar ainda mais a barra, misturando tudo aquilo que os fãs amam.
Após o final explosivo da 3ª temporada, que terminou com confrontos brutais e reviravoltas que deixaram o destino de Mark Grayson mais incerto do que nunca, nesta temporada, Mark é testado para ver até onde ele deve ir para proteger aqueles que ama, juntamente com seu pai e irmão , enquanto eles devem se unir à Coalizão de Planetas para derrotar o Império do planeta natal de seu pai de uma vez por todas.
O elenco principal Steven Yeun (Mark Grayson/Invencível), Sandra Oh (Deborah “Debbie” Grayson), JK Simmons (Nolan Grayson/Omni-Man), Christian Convery (Oliver Grayson/Jovem Omni-Man) e Gillian Jacobs (Samantha Eve Wilkins/Eve Atômica) retornam.
O elenco secundário que também retornarão:
- Andrew Rannells como William Francis Clockwell
- Walton Goggins como Cecil Stedman
- Chris Diamantopoulos como Donald Ferguson, Isotope
- Jonathan Banks como Brit
- Ross Marquand como The Immortal, Rex Conners
- Jason Mantzoukas como Rex Conners
- Zachary Quinto como Robot
- Malese Jow como Kate Cha/Dupli-Kate
- Grey Griffin como Amanda/Monster Girl (human form), Rachel/Shrinking Rae, Betsy Wilkins, Thula
- Khary Payton como Markus Grimshaw/Black Samson
- Kevin Michael Richardson como Amanda/Monster Girl
- Mark Hamill como Arthur “Art” Rosenbaum
- Seth Rogen como Allen the Alien
- Clancy Brown como Damien Darkblood, Kregg
- Bruce Campbell como Great Beast
- Fred Tatasciore como Giant, Adam Wilkins
- Luke Macfarlane como Rick Sheridan
- Jay Pharoah como Zandale Randolph/Bulletproof
- Ben Schwartz como Shapesmith, Rus Livingston
- Cleveland Berto como Bolt
- Cliff Curtis como Paul
- Calista Flockhart como April Howsam
- Todd Williams como Titan
- Tzi Ma como Mister Liu
- Simu Liu como Multi-Paul
- Mae Whitman como War Woman II
- Eric Bauza como D.A. Sinclair
- Michael Dorn como Thokk/Battle Beast
- Peter Cullen como Thaedus
- Tatiana Maslany como Telia
- Phil LaMarr como Lucan
- Shantel VanSanten como Anissa
- Jeffrey Dean Morgan como Conquest
Entre as novidadades estão Matthew Rhys na voz do Dinossauro e Lee Pace como Thragg, o líder supremo do Império Viltrumita, preparando o terreno para o arco da Guerra Viltrumita.
A 4ª temporada de “Invencível” (Invincible) estreia com os três primeiros episódios em março de 2026 no catálogo da Prime Video, e deve ser lançados semanalmente até abril de 2026.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYyFgM0XTuc
Minhas Aventuras com o Superman – 3ª temporada
Criação: Jake Wyatt, Brendan Clougher, Josie Campbell
Estúdio: Warner Bros. Animation, Studio Mir, DC Studios, Adult Swim
Estreia: Primeiro trimestre de 2026A série animada “Minhas Aventuras com o Superman” transforma cada episódio numa celebração do coração por trás da capa vermelha do Homem de Aço. E agora, com a 3ª temporada chegando em 2026, essa animação promete elevar ainda mais essa mistura de ação, emoção e humor.
A terceira temporada de promete levar Clark Kent (Voz de Jack Quaid) ainda mais aos desafios de equilibrar seu crescente heroísmo como Superman com sua vida como repórter do Planeta Diário e parceiro de Lois Lane (Voz de Alice Lee).
Os novos episódios incluirão a chegada de um Lex Luthor (Voz de Max Mittelman) completamente careca e a tão aguardada transformação de Hank Henshaw no Superman Ciborgue. O Superboy também entrará na história pela primeira vez.
A temporada dará continuidade à jornada de Kara Zor-El (Voz de Kiana Madeira) enquanto ela se adapta à vida na Terra após se libertar do controle de Brainiac (Voz de Michael Emerson). Além disso, a 3ª temporada pode plantar as sementes para o spin-off em desenvolvimento “Minhas Aventuras com a Lanterna Verde”, sugerindo um universo animado mais amplo no futuro.
A 3ª temporada de “Minhas Aventuras com o Superman” estreia no primeiro trimestre de 2026 no Cartoon Network e no catálogo da HBO Max (e daqui à alguns anos na Netflix).
Demolidor: Renascido – 2ª temporada
Criação: Dario Scardapane, Matt Corman, Chris Ord
Estúdio: Marvel Studios (Television), Disney
Estreia: 4 de março de 2026“Demolidor: Renascido” (Daredevil: Born Again) retorna para sua 2ª temporada, prometendo não apenas ação visceral, mas uma revolta narrativa que vai além dos punhos e da lei.
Depois do final da 1ª temporada, onde o prefeito Wilson Fisk (Vincent D’Onofrio) assumiu o controle de Nova York, proibiu o vigilantismo e transformou o Homem Sem Medo no criminoso mais procurado da América. Agora, Matt Murdock (Charlie Cox) está se escondendo, e ao mesmo tempo montando sua própria equipe capaz de derrubar esse tirano.
O retorno de personagens icônicos aumenta ainda mais a chama dessa narrativa intensa: Krysten Ritter volta como Jessica Jones, reunindo suas forças com Murdock em uma dinâmica crua e cheia de ironia lá dos tempos de “Defensores” (2017). Os detalhes específicos da presença de Jessica Jones na história permanecem em segredo, mas Brad Winderbaum, chefe da Marvel Television, confirma que é comparável à presença do Justiceiro de Jon Bernthal na primeira temporada.
Ao lado de Cox, Ritter e D’Onofrio, outros nomes como Margarita Levieva (Heather Glenn), Deborah Ann Woll (Karen Page), Elden Henson (Foggy Nelson), Wilson Bethel (Benjamin “Dex” Poindexter/Mecernário), Zabryna Guevara (Sheila Rivera), Nikki M. James (Kirsten McDuffie), Genneya Walton (BB Urich), Arty Froushan (Buck Cashman), Clark Johnson (Cherry), Michael Gandolfini (Daniel Blake), e Ayelet Zurer (Vanessa Fisk) retornam da primeira temporada.
Matthew Lillard entrou para o elenco da nova temporada interpretando Sr. Charles, , um oponente político de Fisk.
A 2ª temporada de Demolidor: Renascido” (Daredevil: Born Again) estreia em 4 de março de 2026 no catálogo do Disney+, e deve ser lançados semanalmente até abril de 2026.
Batman: A Queda do Morcego (Knightfall)
Direção: Jeff Wamester
Estúdio: Warner Bros. Animation, DC,
Estreia: A definirUma adaptação cinematográfica animada em várias partes de uma das histórias mais populares do Batman dos anos 1990, “Batman: A Queda do Morcego” (Knightfall) está atualmente em produção na Warner Bros. Animation, e segundo informações a primeira parte será lançada em 2026.
O filme é baseado na saga em quadrinhos do Batman de mesmo nome, lançada em três partes entre 1993 e 1994. Foi criada por Doug Moench, Chuck Dixon, Alan Grant, Dennis O’Neil, Peter David, Jo Duffy, Jim Aparo, Graham Nolan, Norm Breyfogle e Jim Balent.
Segundo a sinopse oficial, a primeira parte adaptará o primeiro arco da história: “Quando o misterioso gigante conhecido apenas como Bane liberta toda a galeria de vilões do Batman do Asilo Arkham, o Cavaleiro das Trevas é levado ao seu limite físico e mental.”
O longa tem direção de Jeff Wamester e roteiro de Jeremy Adams. Rick Morales atua como produtor supervisor, ao lado dos produtores Jim Krieg e Kimberly S. Moreau. Sam Register e Michael Uslan são os produtores executivos.
“Batman: A Queda do Mocergo – Parte 1” estreia em algum momento de 2026 no catálogo da HBO Max (e daqui à alguns anos na Netflix).
O Justiceiro (Especial)
Criação: Reinaldo Marcus Green, Jon Bernthal
Estúdio: Marvel Studios (Television), Disney
Estreia: a definirO retorno de Jon Bernthal como Justiceiro não vai se bastar apenas na série do Demolidor. Além de aparecer no próximo filme do Homem-Aranha de Tom Holland, “Um Novo Dia“, o personagem estrelará seu próprio especial para o streaming.
Dirigido por Reinaldo Marcus Green (King Richards), que co-escreveu o roteiro ao lado de Bernthal, o elenco também conta com Jason R. Moore como Curtis Hoyle, um amigo próximo de Frank Castle e ex-SARC da Marinha dos EUA, que se tornou o líder de um grupo de terapia depois de perder a parte inferior da perna esquerda em combate.
Além disso, Roe Rancell foi escalado como Dennis, e espera-se que a personagem Ma Gnucci apareça no especial.
Ainda sem título. o Especial do Justiceiro, estreia em algum momento de 2026 no catálogo do Disney+.
X-Men ’97 – 2ª temporada
Criação: Beau DeMayo, (Atuais showrunners: Larry Houston, Eric Lewald, Julia Lewald
Estúdio: Marvel Studios (Animation), Disney
Estreia: Entre Junho e agosto de 2026“X-Men ’97“, um dos maiores (e poucos) sucesso recentes da Marvel referente aos Mutantes está voltando em 2026 par uma nova temporada.
Assim como sua antecessora, a série apresenta uma formação de equipe semelhante à dos quadrinhos dos X-Men do início dos anos 90, incluindo Ciclope, Jean Grey, Tempestade, Wolverine, Morfo, Vampira, Fera, Gambit, Jubileu e Bishop; em grande parte semelhante à Equipe Azul de Ciclope, estabelecida nas primeiras edições de X-Men (Vol. 2) . No entanto, diferentemente de sua antecessora, a formação muda de episódio para episódio e é refletida nos créditos de abertura.
Nesta temporada, A série seguirá diretamente de onde parou, com Magneto no comando e os X-Men lidando com um mundo que os teme. os X-Men estão espalhados pelo tempo e precisam encontrar o caminho de volta para a década de 1990 enquanto exploram as consequências emocionais da tragédia de Genosha e introduzindo o vilão Apocalypse, prometendo uma trama mais intensa e expandida.
A série manterá o espírito da animação clássica dos anos 90, mas com uma narrativa mais madura e uma escala maior, com personagens usando uniformes inspirados na fase de Grant Morrison a frente dos X-Men.
O criador e roteirista principal Beau DeMayo foi demitido pela Marvel Studios em março de 2024, após uma investigação que levou a descobertas “graves”, com isso os créditos de roteirista da 2ª temporada de DeMayo foram removidos devido a violações de seu acordo de rescisão. Matthew Chauncey, roteirista da primeira série animada da Marvel Studios, “What If…?” (2021–2024), foi contratado para substituir DeMayo como roteirista principal da série a partir da 3ª temporada que já está confirmada.
A 2ª temporada de “X-Men ’97” estreia semanalmente entre junho e agosto de 2026 no catálogo do Disney+.
The Boys – 5ª Temporada
Criação: Eric Kripke
Estúdio: Amazon MGM Studios, Sony Pictures Television, Kripke Enterprises, Original Film, Point Grey Pictures
Estreia: 8 de abril de 2026A guerra final entre os Sups e humanos tem data para começar. 2026 é o ano que acontece a 5ª e última temporada de “The Boys“, encerrando uma das produções mais provocativas, violentas e politicamente afiadas da Prime Video.
A 5ª temporada acontece em um mundo totalmente dominado pelo Capitão Pátria (Antony Starr). Hughie (Jack Quaid), Leitinho (Laz Alonso) e Frenchie (Tomer Capone) aparecem presos em um campo militar conhecido como “Campo da Liberdade”, enquanto Annie/Luz Estrela (Erin Moriarty) tenta organizar uma resistência contra o império dos Supers. Kimiko (Karen Fukuhara) está desaparecida, e o destino dos rapazes parece selado até o retorno de Billy Bruto (Karl Urban).
No trailer exibido na CCXP em dezembro de 2025, Bruto surge disposto a recorrer à sua arma mais extrema: um vírus capaz de exterminar todos os super-humanos do planeta. “Mesmo que eu tenha que arrastar seus cadáveres quebrados até a linha de chegada, vamos até o fim, custe o que custar”, diz ele em uma fala que já entrou para o hall das frases mais marcantes da série.
Jessie T. Usher (Trem-Bala), Chace Crawford (Profundo), Nathan Mitchell (Black Noir II), Colby Minifie (Ashley Barrett), Cameron Crovetti (Ryan), Susan Heyward (Jessica “Sage” Bradley/Irmã Sage), Valorie Curry (isty Tucker Gray/Firecracker), e Jeffrey Dean Morgan (Joe Kessler) retornam para temporada final.
Para o quinto ano, Daveed Diggs se junta ao elenco, assim como Mason Dye (‘Stranger Things’), que interpretará Bombsight. Além disso, a série reunirá as estrelas de ‘Supernatural’: Jared Padalecki e Misha Collins, ao lado de Jensen Ackles, que retorna como Soldier Boy.
A 5ª e última temporada de “The Boys” estreia em 8 de abril de 2026, exclusivamente no catálogo da Prime Video, com os dois primeiros episódios. Os seis episódios restantes serão lançados semanalmente até 20 de maio..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzbWryxxn0c
4 Kids Walk Into a Bank
Direção: Frankie Shaw
Estúdio: Amazon MGM Studios, Miramax, Picturestart, Point Grey Pictures, Black Mask Studios, Uncle Pete Productions
Estreia: 17 de abril de 2026 (Estados Unidos)Frankie Shaw, roteirista, diretora e estrela da subestimada série da Showtime , “ SMILF ”, estreia na direção de longas-metragens com “4 Kids Walk Into a Bank”, adaptação da graphic novel de Matthew Rosenberg e Tyler Boss.
Ambientado na década de 1990, o filme acompanha uma garota de 11 anos extremamente inteligente, cujo grupo de desajustados elabora um assalto maluco após descobrir as ligações criminosas de seu pai distante. O filme combina humor negro com a engenhosidade de uma criança, levando o gênero de aventura adolescente para um território mais bruto e engraçado.
Liam Neeson lidera o elenco, acompanhado por Talia Ryder , Whitney Peak, Jack Dylan Grazer, Spike Fearn, Teresa Palmer e Jim Sturgess, além de George Basil , Sam Strike, Caylee Cowan e Deacon Phillippe.
“4 Kids Walk Into a Bank” estreia em 17 de abril de 2026 nos cinemas dos Estados Unidos, com distribuição da Amazon MGM Studios (Orion Pictures). Sem data de lançamento no Brasil.
Supergirl
Direção: Craig Gillespie
Estúdio: DC Studios, Warner Bros. Pictures
Estreia: 25 de junho de 2026“Supergirl” é o segundo longa-metragem do novo Universo DC (DCU), que foi iniciado com “Superman“, e adaptará a minissérie em quadrinhos “Supergirl: A Mulher do Amanhã” de Tom King e Bilquis Evely, com direção de Craig Gillespie (“Cruella”, “Eu, Tonya”).
Com roteiro escrito por Ana Nogueira (que irá escrever o futuro filme da Mulher-Maravilha), o longa acompanha Kara Zor-El viajando pela galáxia par comemorar seu 23º aniversário com a companhia do seu cachorro Krypto, como vimos no final do filme do Superman. Ao longo do caminho, ela conhece a jovem Ruthye Marye Knoll e se depara com uma tragédia que a leva a uma “busca assassina por vingança”.
Milly Alcock estrela como Kara Zor-El/Supergirl, prima de Kal-El / Superman, criada em um pedaço do planeta destruído Krypton e que viu todos ao seu redor morrerem, tornando-a uma pessoa mais cínica do que seu primo, que foi criado na Terra por pais amorosos. Como os kryptonianos são curados e ganham poderes com sóis amarelos, a Supergirl gosta de festejar em planetas com sóis vermelhos, onde pode se embriagar.
O produtor do filme e co-CEO da DC Studios, James Gunn imaginou a Supergirl como uma “personagem meio fada , mas com muita atitude”. Tanto Gunn quanto Gillespie a descreveram como uma anti-heroína, já Alcock descreveu a Supergirl como uma heroína relutante. “Ela não aceita esse papel. Ela não quer ser uma heroína, ela é relutante.”
O elenco também conta com Eve Ridley como Ruthye Marye Knoll, a jovem que recruta a Supergirl em sua jornada para vingar a morte de seu pai, Matthias Schoenaerts como o vilão Krem das Colinas Amarelas, além de David Krumholtz e Emily Beecham, que viverão Zor-EL e Alura In-Ze, os pais da Kara, enquato David Corenswet reprisa seu papel como o primo de Kara, Superman em uma participação especial.
Jason Momoa, que viveu o Aquaman no antigo DCEU (informalmente nomeado de Snyderverso) retornará interpretando um personagem que ele sempre quis viver, o caçador de recompenças intergalático do planeta Czarnia, Lobo.
“Supergirl” estreia nos cinemas brasileiros em 25 de junho de 2026, com distribuição da Warner Bros. Pictures, e após sua jornada nos cinemas, o filme chegará no catálogo da HBO Max (e daqui à alguns anos na Netflix).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyYffSLpWqM
Homem-Aranha: Um Novo Dia
Direção: Destin Daniel Cretton
Estúdio: Columbia Pictures, Marvel Studios, Pascal Pictures, Sony Pictures Releasing
Estreia: 30 de julho de 2026“Homem-Aranha: Um Novo Dia” (Spider-Man: Brand New Day) marca uma nova fase para o Peter Parker (Tom Holland) acompanhando o esforço de Peter para reconstruir sua vida após os eventos de “Sem Volta para Casa”, onde ele foi completamente apagado da memória de todos, incluindo dos seus amigos, MJ e Ned. Ambientado no submundo do crime de Nova York, o filme expande as conexões do Homem-Aranha com o universo Marvel, ligando-o a personagens como Bruce Banner/Hulk e Frank Castle/Justiceiro.
No elenco de apoio, tem os retornos de Zendaya como Michelle “MJ” Jones, Jacob Batalon como Ned Leeds e Michael Mando como o vilão Escorpião, além das adições de Sadie Sink (Stranger Things), Liza Colón-Zayas (The Bear) e Tramell Tillman (Ruptura) em papéis ainda mantidos em sigilo. Marvin Jones III (Raio Negro) foi contratado para viver o vilão Lápide.
Os veteranos do MCU, Mark Ruffalo e Jon Bernthal foram escalados para reprisarem seus papeis como Bruce Banner/Hulk e Justiceiro respectivamente, e segundo fontes, o trio de heróis entrará em conflito antes de unirem forças contra os verdadeiros vilões.
Dirigido por Destin Daniel Cretton e escrito por Chris McKenna e Erik Sommers, o filme é novamente produzido por Kevin Feige e Amy Pascal.
“Homem-Aranha: Um Novo Dia” (Spider-Man: Brand New Day) estreia nos cinemas brasileiros em 30 de julho de 2026, com distribuição da Sony Pictures Releasing, e após sua jornada nos cinemas, o filme chegará no catálogo da HBO Max.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5uEprvZ8zA
VisionQuest
Criação: Terry Matalas
Estúdio: Marvel Studios (Television), Disney
Estreia: Segundo semestre de 2026Imagine um herói que sempre esteve no meio do Universo Cinematográfico Marvel, mas que agora precisa olhar para dentro de si mesmo para descobrir quem ele realmente é. Essa é a proposta de “VisionQuest“, a minissérie, pronta para fechar uma trilogia iniciada por “WandaVision” (2021) e continuada em “Agatha Desde Sempre” (2024).
Paul Bettany reprisa seu papel como Visão Branco — a versão reconstruída do androide Visão. Após os eventos de WandaVision, ele carrega todas as memórias do Visão original, mas luta para conectar essas lembranças com emoções reais, iniciando uma jornada profunda de autodescoberta que promete ser ao mesmo tempo introspectiva e surpreendentemente humana.
Criada por Terry Matalas (Star Trek: Picard), o enredo mergulha no psicológico, levando o espectador literalmente para dentro da mente de Visão, onde programas de inteligência artificial criados por Tony Stark — como Ultron, J.A.R.V.I.S., F.R.I.D.A.Y. e E.D.I.T.H. — ganham formas humanas e conversam com ele de maneiras inesperadas e até perturbadoras.
Além disso, a série promete reunir personagens que marcaram décadas do UCM, com James Spader retornando como Ultron e um elenco que inclui Todd Stashwick como Paladino, um caçador de recompensas que está caçando Visão, T’Nia Miller como Jocasta, Emily Hampshire como EDITH, Orla Brady como FRIDAY, Henry Lewis como DUM-E, Jonathan Sayer como U e James D’Arcy como JARVIS, a primeira IA criada por Stark.
Além disso, Faran Tahir reprisa seu papel como Raza, o líder da facção Dez Anéis que sequestrou Stark no filme “Homem de Ferro” (2008). Também aparecem Lauren Morais como Lisa Molinari, Diane Morgan como uma associada de Paladin; e Mary McDonnell em um papel não revelado.
O ator Ruaridh Mollica vai interpretar Tommy Maximoff, filho velocista de Visão e Wanda Maximoff , cuja alma foi colocada no corpo adolescente de Thomas Shepherd por seu irmão gêmeo Billy Maximoff na série Agatha Desde Sempre (2024).
“VisionQuest” estreia no segundo semestre de 2026 no catálogo do Disney+.
Lanternas
Criação: Chris Mundy, Damon Lindelof, Tom King
Estúdio: DC Studios, Warner Bros. Television, HBO
Estreia: Entre Julho e Setembro de 2026Após anos de desenvolvimento, iniciado originalmente em 2019 como uma produção da HBO Max, com envolvimento de Greg Berlanti, e estrelada por Finn Wittrock como Guy Gardner e Jeremy Irvine como Alan Scott em 2021, a série dos Lanternas Verdes foi completamente reformulada com a chegada de James Gunn e Peter Safran como co-presidentes e co-CEOs da recém-formada DC Studios em outubro de 2022.
Desta vez a produção que veremos neste ano se concentrar em John Stewart fazendo dupla com a lenda da Tropa Hal Jordan. Com criação de Chris Mundy, Damon Lindelof e Tom King, a série “Lanternas” acompanha o experiente Lanterna Hal Jordan (Kyle Chandler) e o recruta novato John Stewart (Aaron Pierre) enquanto investigam um assassinato no Nebraska, o que os leva a mistérios e acertos de contas mais sombrios.
Kyle Chandler viverá Hal Jordan, um ex-piloto de testes e membro lendário da Tropa dos Lanternas Verdes que está se aproximando da aposentadoria, e está treinando John Stewart. Os roteiristas se inspiraram na interpretação de Sam Shepard como Chuck Yeager no filme “Os Eleitos” (1983).
O showrunner Chris Mundy sentiu que Chandler tinha as mesmas qualidades, bem como um humor seco que eles consideravam importante para Jordan.
Aaron Pierre será John Stewart, um novo recruta dos Lanternas Verdes que Jordan está treinando para substituí-lo. Mundy disse que irão adaptar as duas origens do personagem, em que ele era tanto um fuzileiro naval quanto um arquiteto, e sentiu que Pierre poderia retratar ambos os aspectos.
Ele disse que Pierre era um “ator de teatro sério, mas também parece ter sido construído em um laboratório para ser uma estrela de ação”. O diretor James Hawes disse que Pierre tinha “uma presença magnífica. Ele parece tão imponente, tão frio, tão discreto.”
O elenco também conta com Kelly Macdonald como a xerife Kerry, Poorna Jagannathan como Zoe, possível interesse amoroso de John Stewart, Garrett Dillahunt como William Macon, Jason Ritter como Billy Macon, Nicole Ari Parker e Jasmine Cephas Jones como versões adulta e jovem de Bernadette Stewart, mãe de John, Sherman Augustus e J. Alphonse Nicholson como versões de John Stewart Sr., Chris Coy como Waylon Sanders, Ulrich Thomsen como o supervilão Sinestro e Paul Ben-Victor como Antaan, com rumores de que seja Atrocitus, vilão líder da Tropa dos Lanternas Vermelhos.
Outro nome especulado é o de Laura Linney, indicada três vezes ao Oscar e ao Emmy, como possível Carol Ferris, interesse romântico de Hal Jordan que também assume o papel de Safira Estrela nos quadrinhos.
A 1ª temporada de “Lanternas” estreia entre julho e setembro de 2026 na HBO e no catálogo da HBO Max (e daqui à alguns anos na Netflix).
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSLYt_zjBWz/
Cara-de-Barro (Clayface)
Direção: James Watkins
Estúdio: DC Studios, Warner Bros. Pictures
Estreia: 10 de setembro de 2026Fazendo parte do novo Universo DC (DCU) de James Gunn, o terror corporal “Cara-de-Barro” (Clayface) vem mostrar a versatilidade de gêneros do Universo.
Com roteiro inicial foi escrito por Mike Flanagan (A Maldição da Residência Hill, A Maldição da Mansão Bly, Missa da Meia-Noite, A Queda da Casa de Usher, Doutor Sono), com revisões de Hossein Amini (Drive), e dirigido por James Watkins (“Não Fale o Mal”) o filme se baseará tanto no clássico A Mosca (1986), de David Cronenberg, quanto no icônico episódio Feat of Clay (Perito em Formas Humanas) de “Batman: A Série Animada“.
Tom Rhys Harries viverá Matt Hagen, um ator promissor que, após ter o rosto desfigurado por um gângster, se submete a um experimento da cientista Caitlin Bates (interpretada por Naomi Ackie), CEO de uma start-up de biotecnologia. O tratamento, no entanto, o transforma em uma criatura capaz de remodelar o corpo como argila e assumir múltiplas formas humanas. Max Minghella e Eddie Marsan também estão no elenco.
O filme é produzido por James Gunn e Peter Safran da DC Studios, com Matt Reeves (The Batman) e Lynn Harris pela 6th & Idaho. Chantal Nong Vo e Lars P. Winther atuam como produtores executivos.
“Cara-de-Barro” (Clayface) estreia nos cinemas brasileiros em 10 de setembro de 2026, com distribuição da Warner Bros. Pictures, e após sua jornada nos cinemas, o filme chegará no catálogo da HBO Max (e daqui à alguns anos na Netflix).
Seu Amigão da Vizinhança, Homem-Aranha – 2ª temporada
Criação: Jeff Trammell
Estúdio: Marvel Studios (Animation), Disney
Estreia: Segundo semestre de 2026A versão alternativa do Homem-Aranha do MCU retorna para a 2ª temporada, continuando com a premissa “e se a mentoria fosse ao contrário?” — com Norman Osborn como a influência orientadora (e possivelmente corrosiva) de Peter, em vez de Tony Stark.
O criador e showrunner Jeff Trammell permanece como o pilar tonal da série, mantendo-a fiel ao DNA clássico do Homem-Aranha em sua jornada de amadurecimento, enquanto permite que a premissa do multiverso reinvente a mitologia familiar.
Hudson Thames volta a dublar Peter Parker/Homem-Aranha, ao lado de vozes importantes que retornam, incluindo Colman Domingo como Norman Osborn e Charlie Cox como Demolidor. Personagens que também retornam da 1ª temporada incluem Nico Minoru, Harry Osborn, Otto Octavius, Dmitri Smerdyakov/Camaleão e Mac Gargan/Escorpião.
A personagem Gwen Stacy e o seu alter-ego Spider-Gwen, deve finalmente aparecer, mas ainda não se sabe quem a dublará.
A 2ª temporada de “Seu Amigão da Vizinhança, Homem-Aranha” estreia no segundo semestre de 2026 no catálogo do Disney+.
Vought Rising
Criação: Eric Kripke (showrunner: Paul Grellong)
Estúdio: Amazon MGM Studios, Sony Pictures Television, Kripke Enterprises, Original Film, Point Grey Pictures
Estreia: A definirJensen Ackles retorna como Soldier Boy, contracenando com Aya Cash como Stormfront (Tempesta), a heróina nazista em “Vought Rising“, a nova série derivada do Universo “The Boys“, que se passa na década de 1950.
Criada por Eric Kripke, com Paul Grellong atuando como showrunner, a série ambientada na década de 1950, a prequela apresenta um mistério de assassinato intrigante nos primórdios da Vought, acompanhando as primeiras experiências de Soldier Boy e as “manobras diabólicas” da Tempesta enquanto a mitologia da empresa nasce.
O elenco principal da série também inclui Mason Dye, que aparecerá na 5ª temporada da série principal como o herói Bombsight, Elizabeth Posey como a heróina Private Angel, Will Hochman como o herói Torpedo, além de Jorden Myrie, Nicolò Pasetti, Ricky Staffieri, Brian J. Smith e KiKi Layne.
O elenco recorrente inclui Cecily Strong, Mark Pellegrino, Eric Johnson, Annie Shapero, Raphael Sbarge, Romi Shraiter, Aaron Douglas e David Hewlett.
A 1ª temporada de “Vought Rising” estreia em algum momento de 2026, exclusivamente no catálogo da Prime Video.
Batman: Cruzado Encapuzado – 2ª temporada
Criação: Bruce Timm
Estúdio: Warner Bros. Animation, Amazon MGM Studios, Bad Robot Productions, 6th & Idaho, DC Entertainment
Estreia: A definirQuando Bruce Wayne decide que Gotham não vai sucumbir à criminalidade sem lutar, ele veste sua capa e mergulha de cabeça em uma guerra que é tão psicológica quanto física — e é exatamente essa intensidade que a 2ª temporada de “Batman: Cruzado Encapuzado” (Batman: Caped Crusader) promete elevar ao máximo.
A animação, uma das mais intrigantes releituras do mito do Homem-Morcego, foi criada por nomes lendários como Bruce Timm (Batman: A Série Animada), com produção de J.J. Abrams e Matt Reeves, trazendo uma Gotham de espírito noir dos anos 1940.
Na 1ª temporada, vimos um Bruce Wayne em sua cruzada solitária contra o crime, enfrentando gangues e vilões clássicos em uma cidade corroída pela corrupção e pelo medo, um retrato que chamou atenção por misturar estética retrô com narrativa moderna e sombria.
Agora, na 2ª temporada, essa tonalidade ganhará ainda mais profundidade quando o Coringa assume o papel de antagonista principal. James Tucker, co-showrunner da série, revelou que esta nova interpretação do Palhaço do Crime será bastante diferente das vertentes mais conhecidas.
A pré-produção já está em andamento, com roteiros sendo trabalhados e a equipe cumprindo os primeiros passos da produção, o que reforça a dedicação em entregar uma sequência digna do legado que a série instaurou.
A 2ª temporada de “Batman: Cruzado Encapuzado” (Batman: Caped Crusader) estreia em algum momento de 2026, exclusivamente no catálogo da Prime Video.
Aranha-Noir (Spider-Noir)
Criação: Oren Uziel
Estúdio: Amazon MGM Studios, Sony Pictures Television, Lord Miller Productions, Pascal Pictures
Estreia: A definirPor anos, a Sony tentou estabelecer um universo live-action de vilões e personagens secundários do “Homem-Aranha”, (“Venom, Morbius, Madame-Teia, Kraven, o Caçador“) apesar de inúmeras tentativas os projetos se mostraram ser um tremendo fracasso, tendo apenas uma trilogia de sucesso.
Mas, de repente, o Homem-Aranha Noir, personagem imortalizado por Nicolas Cage no sucesso de animação “Homem-Aranha no Aranhaverso”, ganhou vida excepcionalmente rápido em 2024.
Desenvolvida por Oren Uziel e Steve Lightfoot, a série “Aranha-Noir (Spider-Noir)” traz Cage de volta ao papel de Noir, mas não interpretando Peter Parker, e sim Ben Riley, um investigador particular azarado que luta contra seu passado como o único super-herói da cidade na Nova York dos anos 1930.
Brendan Gleeson viverá um chefe da máfia de Nova York. Gleeson descreveu o personagem como um filósofo com “uma visão panorâmica” que é igualmente perigoso; Lamorne Morris será como Robbie Robertson, um jornalista trabalhador que busca histórias mais arriscadas para atrair atenção e progredir na carreira. O personagem apareceu na trilogia do Homem-Aranha, de Sam Raimi.
O elenco também inclui Jack Huston, Abraham Popoola, Li Jun Li, Karen Rodriguez, Lukas Hass, Cameron Britton, Cary Christopher, Michael Kostroff, Scott MacArthur, Joe Massingill, Whitney Rice, Amanda Schull, Andrew Lewis Caldwell, Amy Aquino, e Andrew Robinson.
A série é produzida pelos produtores do “Aranhaverso”, Phil Lord e Christopher Millerpela Lord Miller Productionse pela Amy Pascal, da Pascal Pictures.
“Aranha-Noir (Spider-Noir)” estreia em algum momento de 2026, exclusivamente no catálogo da Prime Video.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJkn3w7p881/
Criminal
Criação: Ed Brubaker
Estúdio: Amazon MGM Studios, Legendary Television, Beautiful Trash, Car Beans, Big Indie Pictures
Estreia: A definirUma história intergeracional de famílias conectadas por um passado criminal em comum, “Criminal”, adaptação da série de quadrinhos de mesmo nome de Ed Brubaker e Sean Phillips, que será produzida pelo próprio Brubaker ao lado de Jordan Harper (“ The Mentalist ”) para o Prime Video.
Com direção da dupla Anna Boden e Ryan Fleck (“Capitã Marvel”), e do diretor Dee Rees, a série de oito episódios acompanha várias gerações de famílias criminosas e explora os assassinatos que conectam seus passados.
Charlie Hunnam estrelará como Leo, também conhecido como Coward, um gênio do crime que planeja seus trabalhos sem usar armas ou violência, ao contrário de seu pai Tommy, Richard Jenkins interpretará Ivan, um ex-ladrão que agora sofre de demência; ele é o melhor amigo do pai de Leo, Adria Arjona viverá Greta, uma motorista e ladra de carros que não consegue se livrar da vida criminosa mesmo depois de ficar viúva em um trabalho, Kadeem Hardison viverá Gnarly, um ex-boxeador e amigo de Leo e Ivan, Logan Browning como Jenny, uma detetive de Assuntos Internos que foi criada com Leo.
Além deles, Emilia Clarke interpretará Mallory, uma ladra armada em uma equipe e relacionamento com Ricky Lawless (Gus Halper) e Luke Evans como Tracy Lawless, um ex-criminoso forçado a entrar para o exército para evitar a prisão e que eventualmente se junta às Forças Especiais do Exército.
O elenco de apoio inclui Pat Healy, John Hawkes, Taylor Selé, Aliyah Camacho, Michael Mando, Marvin Jones III, Michael Xavier, Dominic Burgess, Garrett Hedlund, Chris Diamantopoulos, Lawrence Kao, Katie Stevens, John Pyper-Ferguson, Robert Lee Hart, Aina Brei’yon, e Kyle Davis.
A 1ª temporada de “Crimanal” estreia em algum momento de 2026, exclusivamente no catálogo da Prime Video.
Look Back (Live-action)
Direção: Hirokazu Kore-eda
Estúdio: K2 Pictures
Estreia: Segundo semestre de 2026 no JapãoAlém de “Sheep in the Box“, o premiado diretor Hirokazu Kore-eda também será o diretor da adaptação live-action do mangá de Tatsuki Fujimoto “Look Back“.
O projeto marca a primeira versão em live-action da história de amadurecimento de Fujimoto sobre duas jovens que perseguem o sonho de se tornarem artistas de mangá e evolui ao longo de anos de crescimento silencioso e perdas.
Kore-eda, cujos créditos incluem o vencedor da Palma de Ouro “Assunto de Família (Shoplifters)“, os filmes da competição de Cannes “Monster“, “Broker” e “Pais e Filhos“, está atualmente em pós-produção do longa-metragem após as filmagens em Nikaho City.
Fujimoto, criador do mangá de sucesso “Chainsaw Man“, que vendeu mais de 34 milhões de cópias em todo o mundo, disse: “Se o diretor Kore-eda for mesmo filmar ‘Look Back‘, não tenho mais nada a dizer. Estou ansioso para ver o filme.”
Publicado originalmente na Shonen Jump+ em 2021, “Look Back” gerou grande repercussão após seu lançamento, registrando mais de 2,5 milhões de visualizações no primeiro dia e vendendo 900.000 cópias no Japão. Desde então, o mangá foi publicado em 37 países e vendeu mais de 750.000 cópias internacionalmente.
A obra ganhou uma adaptação para animação em 2024, dirigida por Oshiyama Kiyotaka e produzida pelo Studio Durian. O filme liderou as bilheterias japonesas por duas semanas consecutivas e arrecadou cerca de US$ 12,8 milhões durante sua exibição nos cinemas.
“Look Back” estreia no segundo semestre de 2026 nos cinemas do Japão. Sem data de lançamento no Brasil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JuFzykd75c
Vingadores: Doutor Destino (Avengers: Doomsday)
Direção: Anthony Russo, Joe Russo
Estúdio: Marvel Studios, AGBO, Disney
Estreia: 17 de dezembro de 2026“Vingadores: Doutor Destino” (Avengers: Doomsday) será o grande filme evento da Marvel Studios para o final de 2026, reúnindo os diretores Anthony e Joe Russo para sua primeira produção no MCU desde “Vingadores: Ultimato”, de 2019. O roteiro é assinado por Stephen McFeely, veterano da franquia e Michael Waldron, que trabalhou em produções como Loki e Doutor Estranho no Multiverso da Loucura.
O blockbuster serve como o penúltimo capítulo da Saga do Multiverso da Marvel, equilibrando heróis veteranos com novos herós que vimos nos últimos filmes como “Thunderbolts*” e “Quarteto Fantástico: Primeiros Passos“, marcando um importante reencontro com os X-Men da trilogia dos anos 2000.
O elenco de “Doomsday” inclui o retorno de diversos rostos conhecidos do MCU, como Robert Downey Jr., agora interpretando o grande vilão Victor von Doom/Doutor Destino e Chris Evans voltando à interpretar Steve Rogers como foi confirmado no primeiro teaser.
- Benedict Cumberbatch como Stephen Strange/Doutor Estranho
- Chris Hemsworth como Thor
- India Rose Hemsworth como Amor (Love)
- Tom Hiddleston como Deus Loki
- Anthony Mackie como Sam Wilson/Capitão América
- Sebastian Stan como Bucky Barnes/Soldado Invernal
- Danny Ramirez como Joaquín Torres/Falcão
- Letitia Wright como Shuri/Pantera Negra
- Winston Duke como M’Baku
- Tenoch Huerta Mejía como Namor
- Mabel Cadena como Namora
- Alex Livinalli como Attuma
- Simu Liu como Shang-Chi
- Paul Rudd como Scott Lang/Homem-Formiga
- Xochitl Gomez como America Chavez
- Florence Pugh como Yelena Belova
- Lewis Pullman como Robert “Bob” Reynolds/Sentinela
- David Harbour como Alexei Shostakov/Guardião Vermelho
- Wyatt Russell como John Walker/Agente Americano
- Hannah John-Kamen como Ava Starr/Fantasma
- Hayley Atwell como Peggy Carter
A produção também contará com a presença dos X-Men clássicos, incluindo
- Patrick Stewart como Charles Xavier/Professor X
- Ian McKellen como Erik Lehnsherr/Magneto
- James Marsden como Scott Summers/Ciclope
- Rebecca Romijn como Raven Darkhölme/Mística
- Alan Cumming como Kurt Wagner/Noturno
- Kelsey Grammer como Hank McCoy/Fera
Além das presenças de Channing Tatum como Remy LeBeau/Gambit, personagem que foi introduzido em “Deadpool & Wolverine” e o próprio Deadpool, de Ryan Reynolds em uma participação especial.
O Quarteto Fantástico também integrará a narrativa, com Pedro Pascal (Reed Richards/Sr. Fantástico), Vanessa Kirby (Susan Storm/Mulher Invisível), Ebon Moss-Bachrach (Ben Grimm/O Coisa), Joseph Quinn (Johnny StormTocha Humana) e Matthew Wood como H.E.R.B.I.E. (voz) . O elenco ainda não está oficialmente completo e outros atores estão sendo especulados à retornarem.
Produzido por Kevin Feige, “este filme serve como o penúltimo capítulo levando suas conscequências diretamente a “Vingadores: Guerras Secretas”, que estreia em dezembro de 2027.
“Vingadores: Doutor Destino” (Avengers: Doomsday) estreia nos cinemas brasileiros em 17 de dezembro de 2026, com distribuição da Disney, e após sua jornada nos cinemas, o filme chegará no catálogo da Disney+.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAy7K91ZRgY
#AmazonMGMStudios #AmazonPrimeVideo #Batman #CaraDeBarroClayface #DCComics #DCStudios #Demolidor #DemolidorRenascido #Disney #DisneyBrandedTelevision #Filmes #HomemAranha #HomemAranhaUmNovoDia #Invencível #Invincible #LanternaVerde #Lanterns #Listas #Magnum #Marvel #MarvelAnimation #MarvelStudios #MarvelTelevision #OJusticeiro #PrimeVideo #SériesETV #SonyPictures #SonyPicturesTelevision #Supergirl #TheBoys #Vingadores #VingadoresDoomsday #Warner #WarnerBros #WarnerBrosPictures #WonderMan #XMen #XMen97
-
Shrinking s’inscrit dans la durée avec une saison 4 déjà confirmée
Alors que la diffusion de sa troisième saison n’a pas encore débuté, la série Shrinking vient d’obtenir un renouvellement anticipé pour une saison 4 sur Apple TV+. Ce choix stratégique confirme la place centrale de cette comédie dramatique dans l’offre du service de streaming et souligne un succès critique et public durable depuis son lancement en 2023.
Un renouvellement anticipé révélateur de la confiance d’Apple TV+
Une annonce avant même la diffusion de la saison 3
Apple TV+ a officialisé le renouvellement de Shrinking pour une quatrième saison à quelques jours seulement de la première diffusion de la saison 3. Cette dernière débutera le 28 janvier avec la mise en ligne de son premier épisode, avant une diffusion hebdomadaire qui s’étendra jusqu’au 8 avril. Une telle anticipation témoigne d’une confiance affirmée du diffuseur dans le potentiel narratif et la stabilité de la série.
PublicitésUne stratégie de programmation assumée
Ce renouvellement précoce s’inscrit dans une logique de sécurisation des productions phares de la plateforme. En validant une saison supplémentaire avant même que les nouveaux épisodes ne rencontrent leur public, Apple TV+ affirme sa volonté d’inscrire Shrinking dans la durée. La série bénéficie ainsi d’une visibilité renforcée, tant auprès des abonnés que de l’industrie audiovisuelle.
Une distribution solide au cœur du succès de la série
Jason Segel et Harrison Ford en figures centrales
Jason Segel reprend son rôle principal dans Shrinking, aux côtés d’Harrison Ford, dont la présence a largement contribué à la notoriété du programme. Le casting principal réunit également Christa Miller, Jessica Williams, Luke Tennie, Michael Urie, Lukita Maxwell et Ted McGinley, formant un ensemble cohérent qui soutient l’équilibre entre comédie et drame.
PublicitésUn concept narratif toujours d’actualité
La série suit le parcours d’un thérapeute endeuillé qui décide de rompre avec les règles traditionnelles de sa profession en exprimant sans filtre ce qu’il pense à ses patients. En transgressant les principes éthiques et méthodologiques de la thérapie, il provoque des bouleversements majeurs dans la vie de ceux qu’il accompagne, tout en affrontant ses propres fragilités. Cette approche audacieuse continue d’alimenter la singularité du récit.
Une saison 3 enrichie par de nouveaux visages prestigieux
Des retours attendus et des invités réguliers
La troisième saison verra également le retour de plusieurs guest stars déjà appréciées du public, parmi lesquelles Brett Goldstein, Damon Wayans Jr., Wendie Malick et Cobie Smulders. Leur présence contribue à approfondir les intrigues secondaires et à renforcer la dynamique émotionnelle de la série.
PublicitésDes recrues de premier plan
Parmi les nouvelles arrivées figurent Jeff Daniels, Michael J. Fox, Candice Bergen, Sherry Cola et Isabella Gomez. Ces ajouts prestigieux viennent enrichir l’univers de Shrinking et soulignent l’attractivité du projet auprès d’acteurs reconnus. Leur intégration témoigne de l’ambition artistique maintenue par la production pour cette nouvelle saison.
Une production portée par des créateurs reconnus
Un trio créatif à l’origine de la série
Shrinking a été créée par Bill Lawrence, Jason Segel et Brett Goldstein, tous trois impliqués en tant que producteurs exécutifs. La série est produite pour Apple TV+ par Warner Bros. Television, où Lawrence et Goldstein bénéficient d’accords globaux. Bill Lawrence supervise également la production via sa société Doozer Productions.
PublicitésUne équipe de production expérimentée
Aux côtés des créateurs, de nombreux producteurs exécutifs participent à la série, parmi lesquels Neil Goldman, James Ponsoldt, Jeff Ingold, Liza Katzer, Randall Winston, Rachna Fruchbom, Brian Gallivan, Ashley Nicole Black et Bill Posley. Cette équipe expérimentée assure une continuité créative et une cohérence narrative saluées par la critique.
Une reconnaissance critique et institutionnelle affirmée
Un accueil critique favorable depuis 2023
Depuis son lancement, Shrinking a su séduire aussi bien la critique que le public. La série a été régulièrement saluée pour la qualité de son écriture, l’équilibre de son ton et l’interprétation de ses comédiens. Cette réception positive a largement contribué à sa pérennité sur la plateforme.
PublicitésDes nominations prestigieuses
Jason Segel, Harrison Ford, Jessica Williams et Michael Urie ont tous été nommés aux Emmy Awards pour leurs performances respectives. Segel et Ford ont également reçu des nominations aux Golden Globes. En 2025, Shrinking a par ailleurs été en lice dans la catégorie de la meilleure série comique aux Emmy Awards, consacrant son statut de valeur sûre du paysage télévisuel.
Le renouvellement anticipé de Shrinking pour une quatrième saison confirme la solidité artistique et la popularité croissante de la série sur Apple TV+. En conjuguant une écriture nuancée, un casting prestigieux et une reconnaissance critique constante, la production s’impose comme l’un des piliers de la plateforme. La diffusion de la saison 3, attendue dès le 28 janvier, devrait renforcer encore cet engouement.
#AppleTVPlus #comédieDramatique #HarrisonFord #JasonSegel #sérieAppleTV #Shrinking #ShrinkingSaison4 #WarnerBrosTelevision
-
Shrinking s’inscrit dans la durée avec une saison 4 déjà confirmée
Alors que la diffusion de sa troisième saison n’a pas encore débuté, la série Shrinking vient d’obtenir un renouvellement anticipé pour une saison 4 sur Apple TV+. Ce choix stratégique confirme la place centrale de cette comédie dramatique dans l’offre du service de streaming et souligne un succès critique et public durable depuis son lancement en 2023.
Un renouvellement anticipé révélateur de la confiance d’Apple TV+
Une annonce avant même la diffusion de la saison 3
Apple TV+ a officialisé le renouvellement de Shrinking pour une quatrième saison à quelques jours seulement de la première diffusion de la saison 3. Cette dernière débutera le 28 janvier avec la mise en ligne de son premier épisode, avant une diffusion hebdomadaire qui s’étendra jusqu’au 8 avril. Une telle anticipation témoigne d’une confiance affirmée du diffuseur dans le potentiel narratif et la stabilité de la série.
PublicitésUne stratégie de programmation assumée
Ce renouvellement précoce s’inscrit dans une logique de sécurisation des productions phares de la plateforme. En validant une saison supplémentaire avant même que les nouveaux épisodes ne rencontrent leur public, Apple TV+ affirme sa volonté d’inscrire Shrinking dans la durée. La série bénéficie ainsi d’une visibilité renforcée, tant auprès des abonnés que de l’industrie audiovisuelle.
Une distribution solide au cœur du succès de la série
Jason Segel et Harrison Ford en figures centrales
Jason Segel reprend son rôle principal dans Shrinking, aux côtés d’Harrison Ford, dont la présence a largement contribué à la notoriété du programme. Le casting principal réunit également Christa Miller, Jessica Williams, Luke Tennie, Michael Urie, Lukita Maxwell et Ted McGinley, formant un ensemble cohérent qui soutient l’équilibre entre comédie et drame.
PublicitésUn concept narratif toujours d’actualité
La série suit le parcours d’un thérapeute endeuillé qui décide de rompre avec les règles traditionnelles de sa profession en exprimant sans filtre ce qu’il pense à ses patients. En transgressant les principes éthiques et méthodologiques de la thérapie, il provoque des bouleversements majeurs dans la vie de ceux qu’il accompagne, tout en affrontant ses propres fragilités. Cette approche audacieuse continue d’alimenter la singularité du récit.
Une saison 3 enrichie par de nouveaux visages prestigieux
Des retours attendus et des invités réguliers
La troisième saison verra également le retour de plusieurs guest stars déjà appréciées du public, parmi lesquelles Brett Goldstein, Damon Wayans Jr., Wendie Malick et Cobie Smulders. Leur présence contribue à approfondir les intrigues secondaires et à renforcer la dynamique émotionnelle de la série.
PublicitésDes recrues de premier plan
Parmi les nouvelles arrivées figurent Jeff Daniels, Michael J. Fox, Candice Bergen, Sherry Cola et Isabella Gomez. Ces ajouts prestigieux viennent enrichir l’univers de Shrinking et soulignent l’attractivité du projet auprès d’acteurs reconnus. Leur intégration témoigne de l’ambition artistique maintenue par la production pour cette nouvelle saison.
Une production portée par des créateurs reconnus
Un trio créatif à l’origine de la série
Shrinking a été créée par Bill Lawrence, Jason Segel et Brett Goldstein, tous trois impliqués en tant que producteurs exécutifs. La série est produite pour Apple TV+ par Warner Bros. Television, où Lawrence et Goldstein bénéficient d’accords globaux. Bill Lawrence supervise également la production via sa société Doozer Productions.
PublicitésUne équipe de production expérimentée
Aux côtés des créateurs, de nombreux producteurs exécutifs participent à la série, parmi lesquels Neil Goldman, James Ponsoldt, Jeff Ingold, Liza Katzer, Randall Winston, Rachna Fruchbom, Brian Gallivan, Ashley Nicole Black et Bill Posley. Cette équipe expérimentée assure une continuité créative et une cohérence narrative saluées par la critique.
Une reconnaissance critique et institutionnelle affirmée
Un accueil critique favorable depuis 2023
Depuis son lancement, Shrinking a su séduire aussi bien la critique que le public. La série a été régulièrement saluée pour la qualité de son écriture, l’équilibre de son ton et l’interprétation de ses comédiens. Cette réception positive a largement contribué à sa pérennité sur la plateforme.
PublicitésDes nominations prestigieuses
Jason Segel, Harrison Ford, Jessica Williams et Michael Urie ont tous été nommés aux Emmy Awards pour leurs performances respectives. Segel et Ford ont également reçu des nominations aux Golden Globes. En 2025, Shrinking a par ailleurs été en lice dans la catégorie de la meilleure série comique aux Emmy Awards, consacrant son statut de valeur sûre du paysage télévisuel.
Le renouvellement anticipé de Shrinking pour une quatrième saison confirme la solidité artistique et la popularité croissante de la série sur Apple TV+. En conjuguant une écriture nuancée, un casting prestigieux et une reconnaissance critique constante, la production s’impose comme l’un des piliers de la plateforme. La diffusion de la saison 3, attendue dès le 28 janvier, devrait renforcer encore cet engouement.
#AppleTVPlus #comédieDramatique #HarrisonFord #JasonSegel #sérieAppleTV #Shrinking #ShrinkingSaison4 #WarnerBrosTelevision
-
Shrinking s’inscrit dans la durée avec une saison 4 déjà confirmée
Alors que la diffusion de sa troisième saison n’a pas encore débuté, la série Shrinking vient d’obtenir un renouvellement anticipé pour une saison 4 sur Apple TV+. Ce choix stratégique confirme la place centrale de cette comédie dramatique dans l’offre du service de streaming et souligne un succès critique et public durable depuis son lancement en 2023.
Un renouvellement anticipé révélateur de la confiance d’Apple TV+
Une annonce avant même la diffusion de la saison 3
Apple TV+ a officialisé le renouvellement de Shrinking pour une quatrième saison à quelques jours seulement de la première diffusion de la saison 3. Cette dernière débutera le 28 janvier avec la mise en ligne de son premier épisode, avant une diffusion hebdomadaire qui s’étendra jusqu’au 8 avril. Une telle anticipation témoigne d’une confiance affirmée du diffuseur dans le potentiel narratif et la stabilité de la série.
PublicitésUne stratégie de programmation assumée
Ce renouvellement précoce s’inscrit dans une logique de sécurisation des productions phares de la plateforme. En validant une saison supplémentaire avant même que les nouveaux épisodes ne rencontrent leur public, Apple TV+ affirme sa volonté d’inscrire Shrinking dans la durée. La série bénéficie ainsi d’une visibilité renforcée, tant auprès des abonnés que de l’industrie audiovisuelle.
Une distribution solide au cœur du succès de la série
Jason Segel et Harrison Ford en figures centrales
Jason Segel reprend son rôle principal dans Shrinking, aux côtés d’Harrison Ford, dont la présence a largement contribué à la notoriété du programme. Le casting principal réunit également Christa Miller, Jessica Williams, Luke Tennie, Michael Urie, Lukita Maxwell et Ted McGinley, formant un ensemble cohérent qui soutient l’équilibre entre comédie et drame.
PublicitésUn concept narratif toujours d’actualité
La série suit le parcours d’un thérapeute endeuillé qui décide de rompre avec les règles traditionnelles de sa profession en exprimant sans filtre ce qu’il pense à ses patients. En transgressant les principes éthiques et méthodologiques de la thérapie, il provoque des bouleversements majeurs dans la vie de ceux qu’il accompagne, tout en affrontant ses propres fragilités. Cette approche audacieuse continue d’alimenter la singularité du récit.
Une saison 3 enrichie par de nouveaux visages prestigieux
Des retours attendus et des invités réguliers
La troisième saison verra également le retour de plusieurs guest stars déjà appréciées du public, parmi lesquelles Brett Goldstein, Damon Wayans Jr., Wendie Malick et Cobie Smulders. Leur présence contribue à approfondir les intrigues secondaires et à renforcer la dynamique émotionnelle de la série.
PublicitésDes recrues de premier plan
Parmi les nouvelles arrivées figurent Jeff Daniels, Michael J. Fox, Candice Bergen, Sherry Cola et Isabella Gomez. Ces ajouts prestigieux viennent enrichir l’univers de Shrinking et soulignent l’attractivité du projet auprès d’acteurs reconnus. Leur intégration témoigne de l’ambition artistique maintenue par la production pour cette nouvelle saison.
Une production portée par des créateurs reconnus
Un trio créatif à l’origine de la série
Shrinking a été créée par Bill Lawrence, Jason Segel et Brett Goldstein, tous trois impliqués en tant que producteurs exécutifs. La série est produite pour Apple TV+ par Warner Bros. Television, où Lawrence et Goldstein bénéficient d’accords globaux. Bill Lawrence supervise également la production via sa société Doozer Productions.
PublicitésUne équipe de production expérimentée
Aux côtés des créateurs, de nombreux producteurs exécutifs participent à la série, parmi lesquels Neil Goldman, James Ponsoldt, Jeff Ingold, Liza Katzer, Randall Winston, Rachna Fruchbom, Brian Gallivan, Ashley Nicole Black et Bill Posley. Cette équipe expérimentée assure une continuité créative et une cohérence narrative saluées par la critique.
Une reconnaissance critique et institutionnelle affirmée
Un accueil critique favorable depuis 2023
Depuis son lancement, Shrinking a su séduire aussi bien la critique que le public. La série a été régulièrement saluée pour la qualité de son écriture, l’équilibre de son ton et l’interprétation de ses comédiens. Cette réception positive a largement contribué à sa pérennité sur la plateforme.
PublicitésDes nominations prestigieuses
Jason Segel, Harrison Ford, Jessica Williams et Michael Urie ont tous été nommés aux Emmy Awards pour leurs performances respectives. Segel et Ford ont également reçu des nominations aux Golden Globes. En 2025, Shrinking a par ailleurs été en lice dans la catégorie de la meilleure série comique aux Emmy Awards, consacrant son statut de valeur sûre du paysage télévisuel.
Le renouvellement anticipé de Shrinking pour une quatrième saison confirme la solidité artistique et la popularité croissante de la série sur Apple TV+. En conjuguant une écriture nuancée, un casting prestigieux et une reconnaissance critique constante, la production s’impose comme l’un des piliers de la plateforme. La diffusion de la saison 3, attendue dès le 28 janvier, devrait renforcer encore cet engouement.
#AppleTVPlus #comédieDramatique #HarrisonFord #JasonSegel #sérieAppleTV #Shrinking #ShrinkingSaison4 #WarnerBrosTelevision
-
Shrinking s’inscrit dans la durée avec une saison 4 déjà confirmée
Alors que la diffusion de sa troisième saison n’a pas encore débuté, la série Shrinking vient d’obtenir un renouvellement anticipé pour une saison 4 sur Apple TV+. Ce choix stratégique confirme la place centrale de cette comédie dramatique dans l’offre du service de streaming et souligne un succès critique et public durable depuis son lancement en 2023.
Un renouvellement anticipé révélateur de la confiance d’Apple TV+
Une annonce avant même la diffusion de la saison 3
Apple TV+ a officialisé le renouvellement de Shrinking pour une quatrième saison à quelques jours seulement de la première diffusion de la saison 3. Cette dernière débutera le 28 janvier avec la mise en ligne de son premier épisode, avant une diffusion hebdomadaire qui s’étendra jusqu’au 8 avril. Une telle anticipation témoigne d’une confiance affirmée du diffuseur dans le potentiel narratif et la stabilité de la série.
PublicitésUne stratégie de programmation assumée
Ce renouvellement précoce s’inscrit dans une logique de sécurisation des productions phares de la plateforme. En validant une saison supplémentaire avant même que les nouveaux épisodes ne rencontrent leur public, Apple TV+ affirme sa volonté d’inscrire Shrinking dans la durée. La série bénéficie ainsi d’une visibilité renforcée, tant auprès des abonnés que de l’industrie audiovisuelle.
Une distribution solide au cœur du succès de la série
Jason Segel et Harrison Ford en figures centrales
Jason Segel reprend son rôle principal dans Shrinking, aux côtés d’Harrison Ford, dont la présence a largement contribué à la notoriété du programme. Le casting principal réunit également Christa Miller, Jessica Williams, Luke Tennie, Michael Urie, Lukita Maxwell et Ted McGinley, formant un ensemble cohérent qui soutient l’équilibre entre comédie et drame.
PublicitésUn concept narratif toujours d’actualité
La série suit le parcours d’un thérapeute endeuillé qui décide de rompre avec les règles traditionnelles de sa profession en exprimant sans filtre ce qu’il pense à ses patients. En transgressant les principes éthiques et méthodologiques de la thérapie, il provoque des bouleversements majeurs dans la vie de ceux qu’il accompagne, tout en affrontant ses propres fragilités. Cette approche audacieuse continue d’alimenter la singularité du récit.
Une saison 3 enrichie par de nouveaux visages prestigieux
Des retours attendus et des invités réguliers
La troisième saison verra également le retour de plusieurs guest stars déjà appréciées du public, parmi lesquelles Brett Goldstein, Damon Wayans Jr., Wendie Malick et Cobie Smulders. Leur présence contribue à approfondir les intrigues secondaires et à renforcer la dynamique émotionnelle de la série.
PublicitésDes recrues de premier plan
Parmi les nouvelles arrivées figurent Jeff Daniels, Michael J. Fox, Candice Bergen, Sherry Cola et Isabella Gomez. Ces ajouts prestigieux viennent enrichir l’univers de Shrinking et soulignent l’attractivité du projet auprès d’acteurs reconnus. Leur intégration témoigne de l’ambition artistique maintenue par la production pour cette nouvelle saison.
Une production portée par des créateurs reconnus
Un trio créatif à l’origine de la série
Shrinking a été créée par Bill Lawrence, Jason Segel et Brett Goldstein, tous trois impliqués en tant que producteurs exécutifs. La série est produite pour Apple TV+ par Warner Bros. Television, où Lawrence et Goldstein bénéficient d’accords globaux. Bill Lawrence supervise également la production via sa société Doozer Productions.
PublicitésUne équipe de production expérimentée
Aux côtés des créateurs, de nombreux producteurs exécutifs participent à la série, parmi lesquels Neil Goldman, James Ponsoldt, Jeff Ingold, Liza Katzer, Randall Winston, Rachna Fruchbom, Brian Gallivan, Ashley Nicole Black et Bill Posley. Cette équipe expérimentée assure une continuité créative et une cohérence narrative saluées par la critique.
Une reconnaissance critique et institutionnelle affirmée
Un accueil critique favorable depuis 2023
Depuis son lancement, Shrinking a su séduire aussi bien la critique que le public. La série a été régulièrement saluée pour la qualité de son écriture, l’équilibre de son ton et l’interprétation de ses comédiens. Cette réception positive a largement contribué à sa pérennité sur la plateforme.
PublicitésDes nominations prestigieuses
Jason Segel, Harrison Ford, Jessica Williams et Michael Urie ont tous été nommés aux Emmy Awards pour leurs performances respectives. Segel et Ford ont également reçu des nominations aux Golden Globes. En 2025, Shrinking a par ailleurs été en lice dans la catégorie de la meilleure série comique aux Emmy Awards, consacrant son statut de valeur sûre du paysage télévisuel.
Le renouvellement anticipé de Shrinking pour une quatrième saison confirme la solidité artistique et la popularité croissante de la série sur Apple TV+. En conjuguant une écriture nuancée, un casting prestigieux et une reconnaissance critique constante, la production s’impose comme l’un des piliers de la plateforme. La diffusion de la saison 3, attendue dès le 28 janvier, devrait renforcer encore cet engouement.
#AppleTVPlus #comédieDramatique #HarrisonFord #JasonSegel #sérieAppleTV #Shrinking #ShrinkingSaison4 #WarnerBrosTelevision
-
Shrinking Saison 3 : Premières images d’un retour très attendu sur Apple TV
La série à succès “Shrinking”, portée par Jason Segel et Harrison Ford, revient sur Apple TV pour une troisième saison. Composée de 11 épisodes, cette nouvelle salve d’histoires promet de mêler humour, émotion et introspection dès le 28 janvier 2026.
Un retour marquant pour une série devenue incontournable
Une distribution prestigieuse de retour sur le petit écran
Apple TV+ a dévoilé les premières images de la très attendue saison 3 de “Shrinking”, série créée par Bill Lawrence, Brett Goldstein et Jason Segel. Cette nouvelle saison, composée de 11 épisodes, marquera le retour de Jason Segel et Harrison Ford, figures emblématiques du programme.
Ils seront accompagnés de Christa Miller, Jessica Williams, Luke Tennie, Michael Urie, Lukita Maxwell et Ted McGinley. Le premier épisode, d’une durée d’une heure, sera diffusé le mercredi 28 janvier 2026, avant une sortie hebdomadaire jusqu’au 8 avril 2026.Une intrigue toujours aussi humaine et émouvante
Dans cette série, Jason Segel incarne Jimmy, un psychothérapeute en plein deuil qui décide de bousculer les conventions de sa profession. En transgressant les règles et en parlant sans filtre à ses patients, il bouleverse non seulement leur existence, mais également la sienne.
Cette approche audacieuse, entre humour noir et tendresse, a contribué à faire de Shrinking une œuvre singulière sur la thérapie, la vulnérabilité et la reconstruction personnelle.Une saison 3 enrichie de nouveaux visages prestigieux
Des acteurs iconiques rejoignent la distribution
Outre le retour du casting principal, cette troisième saison accueillera de nouveaux noms de renom. Parmi eux, Jeff Daniels et Michael J. Fox, qui viendront enrichir la galerie de personnages déjà hauts en couleur.
Les spectateurs retrouveront également Brett Goldstein, Damon Wayans Jr., Wendie Malick et Cobie Smulders, confirmant la volonté de la production de mêler figures familières et nouvelles énergies.Une production d’envergure signée Warner Bros. Television
Shrinking est produite pour Apple TV+ par Warner Bros. Television, dans le cadre du partenariat entre Bill Lawrence et Brett Goldstein via Doozer Productions.
Les producteurs délégués incluent Bill Lawrence, Jason Segel, Brett Goldstein, Neil Goldman, James Ponsoldt, Jeff Ingold, Liza Katzer, Randall Winston, Rachna Fruchbom, Brian Gallivan, Ashley Nicole Black et Bill Posley.
Une équipe solide qui garantit la continuité qualitative de la série, reconnue pour son écriture fine et sa direction artistique maîtrisée.Apple TV+ poursuit sa collaboration fructueuse avec Bill Lawrence
Un partenariat créatif déjà couronné de succès
La série Shrinking constitue la troisième collaboration entre Apple TV+, Bill Lawrence et Warner Bros. Television, après le triomphe planétaire de “Ted Lasso” et la série “Bad Monkey”, récemment renouvelée pour une deuxième saison.
Cette alliance artistique s’impose comme l’une des plus productives du moment dans l’univers du streaming, conjuguant profondeur émotionnelle et humour bien dosé.Des connexions multiples entre les talents d’Apple TV+
La série marque également la deuxième collaboration entre Brett Goldstein et la plateforme, après le film Apple Original Film “All of You”. De son côté, Jason Segel, qui incarne avec brio le personnage principal de Shrinking, figurait déjà au casting du film “The Sky is Everywhere”, autre production Apple Original.
Cette continuité artistique témoigne de la volonté de la plateforme de fidéliser ses talents tout en construisant une identité narrative cohérente autour d’œuvres sensibles et bien écrites.La saison 3 de Shrinking s’annonce comme l’un des événements majeurs de l’année 2026 pour les abonnés Apple TV+. Entre émotions sincères, humour décalé et réflexions sur la nature humaine, la série poursuit sa route avec une distribution prestigieuse et un savoir-faire scénaristique incontestable. Un rendez-vous à ne pas manquer dès le 28 janvier sur Apple TV+.
#AppleTV #AppleTVPlus #BillLawrence #BrettGoldstein #comédieDramatique #HarrisonFord #JasonSegel #saison3 #sérieAméricaine #Shrinking #WarnerBrosTelevision
-
Shrinking Saison 3 : Premières images d’un retour très attendu sur Apple TV
La série à succès “Shrinking”, portée par Jason Segel et Harrison Ford, revient sur Apple TV pour une troisième saison. Composée de 11 épisodes, cette nouvelle salve d’histoires promet de mêler humour, émotion et introspection dès le 28 janvier 2026.
Un retour marquant pour une série devenue incontournable
Une distribution prestigieuse de retour sur le petit écran
Apple TV+ a dévoilé les premières images de la très attendue saison 3 de “Shrinking”, série créée par Bill Lawrence, Brett Goldstein et Jason Segel. Cette nouvelle saison, composée de 11 épisodes, marquera le retour de Jason Segel et Harrison Ford, figures emblématiques du programme.
Ils seront accompagnés de Christa Miller, Jessica Williams, Luke Tennie, Michael Urie, Lukita Maxwell et Ted McGinley. Le premier épisode, d’une durée d’une heure, sera diffusé le mercredi 28 janvier 2026, avant une sortie hebdomadaire jusqu’au 8 avril 2026.Une intrigue toujours aussi humaine et émouvante
Dans cette série, Jason Segel incarne Jimmy, un psychothérapeute en plein deuil qui décide de bousculer les conventions de sa profession. En transgressant les règles et en parlant sans filtre à ses patients, il bouleverse non seulement leur existence, mais également la sienne.
Cette approche audacieuse, entre humour noir et tendresse, a contribué à faire de Shrinking une œuvre singulière sur la thérapie, la vulnérabilité et la reconstruction personnelle.Une saison 3 enrichie de nouveaux visages prestigieux
Des acteurs iconiques rejoignent la distribution
Outre le retour du casting principal, cette troisième saison accueillera de nouveaux noms de renom. Parmi eux, Jeff Daniels et Michael J. Fox, qui viendront enrichir la galerie de personnages déjà hauts en couleur.
Les spectateurs retrouveront également Brett Goldstein, Damon Wayans Jr., Wendie Malick et Cobie Smulders, confirmant la volonté de la production de mêler figures familières et nouvelles énergies.Une production d’envergure signée Warner Bros. Television
Shrinking est produite pour Apple TV+ par Warner Bros. Television, dans le cadre du partenariat entre Bill Lawrence et Brett Goldstein via Doozer Productions.
Les producteurs délégués incluent Bill Lawrence, Jason Segel, Brett Goldstein, Neil Goldman, James Ponsoldt, Jeff Ingold, Liza Katzer, Randall Winston, Rachna Fruchbom, Brian Gallivan, Ashley Nicole Black et Bill Posley.
Une équipe solide qui garantit la continuité qualitative de la série, reconnue pour son écriture fine et sa direction artistique maîtrisée.Apple TV+ poursuit sa collaboration fructueuse avec Bill Lawrence
Un partenariat créatif déjà couronné de succès
La série Shrinking constitue la troisième collaboration entre Apple TV+, Bill Lawrence et Warner Bros. Television, après le triomphe planétaire de “Ted Lasso” et la série “Bad Monkey”, récemment renouvelée pour une deuxième saison.
Cette alliance artistique s’impose comme l’une des plus productives du moment dans l’univers du streaming, conjuguant profondeur émotionnelle et humour bien dosé.Des connexions multiples entre les talents d’Apple TV+
La série marque également la deuxième collaboration entre Brett Goldstein et la plateforme, après le film Apple Original Film “All of You”. De son côté, Jason Segel, qui incarne avec brio le personnage principal de Shrinking, figurait déjà au casting du film “The Sky is Everywhere”, autre production Apple Original.
Cette continuité artistique témoigne de la volonté de la plateforme de fidéliser ses talents tout en construisant une identité narrative cohérente autour d’œuvres sensibles et bien écrites.La saison 3 de Shrinking s’annonce comme l’un des événements majeurs de l’année 2026 pour les abonnés Apple TV+. Entre émotions sincères, humour décalé et réflexions sur la nature humaine, la série poursuit sa route avec une distribution prestigieuse et un savoir-faire scénaristique incontestable. Un rendez-vous à ne pas manquer dès le 28 janvier sur Apple TV+.
#AppleTV #AppleTVPlus #BillLawrence #BrettGoldstein #comédieDramatique #HarrisonFord #JasonSegel #saison3 #sérieAméricaine #Shrinking #WarnerBrosTelevision
-
Shrinking Saison 3 : Premières images d’un retour très attendu sur Apple TV
La série à succès “Shrinking”, portée par Jason Segel et Harrison Ford, revient sur Apple TV pour une troisième saison. Composée de 11 épisodes, cette nouvelle salve d’histoires promet de mêler humour, émotion et introspection dès le 28 janvier 2026.
Un retour marquant pour une série devenue incontournable
Une distribution prestigieuse de retour sur le petit écran
Apple TV+ a dévoilé les premières images de la très attendue saison 3 de “Shrinking”, série créée par Bill Lawrence, Brett Goldstein et Jason Segel. Cette nouvelle saison, composée de 11 épisodes, marquera le retour de Jason Segel et Harrison Ford, figures emblématiques du programme.
Ils seront accompagnés de Christa Miller, Jessica Williams, Luke Tennie, Michael Urie, Lukita Maxwell et Ted McGinley. Le premier épisode, d’une durée d’une heure, sera diffusé le mercredi 28 janvier 2026, avant une sortie hebdomadaire jusqu’au 8 avril 2026.Une intrigue toujours aussi humaine et émouvante
Dans cette série, Jason Segel incarne Jimmy, un psychothérapeute en plein deuil qui décide de bousculer les conventions de sa profession. En transgressant les règles et en parlant sans filtre à ses patients, il bouleverse non seulement leur existence, mais également la sienne.
Cette approche audacieuse, entre humour noir et tendresse, a contribué à faire de Shrinking une œuvre singulière sur la thérapie, la vulnérabilité et la reconstruction personnelle.Une saison 3 enrichie de nouveaux visages prestigieux
Des acteurs iconiques rejoignent la distribution
Outre le retour du casting principal, cette troisième saison accueillera de nouveaux noms de renom. Parmi eux, Jeff Daniels et Michael J. Fox, qui viendront enrichir la galerie de personnages déjà hauts en couleur.
Les spectateurs retrouveront également Brett Goldstein, Damon Wayans Jr., Wendie Malick et Cobie Smulders, confirmant la volonté de la production de mêler figures familières et nouvelles énergies.Une production d’envergure signée Warner Bros. Television
Shrinking est produite pour Apple TV+ par Warner Bros. Television, dans le cadre du partenariat entre Bill Lawrence et Brett Goldstein via Doozer Productions.
Les producteurs délégués incluent Bill Lawrence, Jason Segel, Brett Goldstein, Neil Goldman, James Ponsoldt, Jeff Ingold, Liza Katzer, Randall Winston, Rachna Fruchbom, Brian Gallivan, Ashley Nicole Black et Bill Posley.
Une équipe solide qui garantit la continuité qualitative de la série, reconnue pour son écriture fine et sa direction artistique maîtrisée.Apple TV+ poursuit sa collaboration fructueuse avec Bill Lawrence
Un partenariat créatif déjà couronné de succès
La série Shrinking constitue la troisième collaboration entre Apple TV+, Bill Lawrence et Warner Bros. Television, après le triomphe planétaire de “Ted Lasso” et la série “Bad Monkey”, récemment renouvelée pour une deuxième saison.
Cette alliance artistique s’impose comme l’une des plus productives du moment dans l’univers du streaming, conjuguant profondeur émotionnelle et humour bien dosé.Des connexions multiples entre les talents d’Apple TV+
La série marque également la deuxième collaboration entre Brett Goldstein et la plateforme, après le film Apple Original Film “All of You”. De son côté, Jason Segel, qui incarne avec brio le personnage principal de Shrinking, figurait déjà au casting du film “The Sky is Everywhere”, autre production Apple Original.
Cette continuité artistique témoigne de la volonté de la plateforme de fidéliser ses talents tout en construisant une identité narrative cohérente autour d’œuvres sensibles et bien écrites.La saison 3 de Shrinking s’annonce comme l’un des événements majeurs de l’année 2026 pour les abonnés Apple TV+. Entre émotions sincères, humour décalé et réflexions sur la nature humaine, la série poursuit sa route avec une distribution prestigieuse et un savoir-faire scénaristique incontestable. Un rendez-vous à ne pas manquer dès le 28 janvier sur Apple TV+.
#AppleTV #AppleTVPlus #BillLawrence #BrettGoldstein #comédieDramatique #HarrisonFord #JasonSegel #saison3 #sérieAméricaine #Shrinking #WarnerBrosTelevision
-
🍿 TV 5 🍿
🍿 The Last of Us is a faithfully visceral adaptation - In-Depth Review 🍿
Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Creators (Platform): Craig Mazin & Neil Druckmann - based on the game series of the same name (NOW)
Publisher (Release): Warner Bros. Television Studios (2023)For more, follow me here, and for the full, uncut review, consider visiting my site: https://phoenix-prjct.com/2024/01/30/%f0%9f%8d%bf-the-last-of-us-is-a-faithfully-visceral-adaptation-in-depth-%f0%9f%8d%bf/
#TheLastofUs #WarnerBros #hbo #tv #tvreview #PedroPascal #bellaramsay
-
Sunday Morning Reading
It’s a Sunday and that means it’s time for Sunday Morning Reading. Fall is beginning its march towards Winter, but the chill in the unusually warm Chicago temperatures this weekend aren’t weather related. Some of that is reflected in today’s selections as well as other topics, some that feed the soul, while others fuel the fires.
It’s tough to watch what’s going on in the streets of some of our cities and towns, and there’s no denying what Ian F. Blair points out That The United Police State of America Has Arrived.
Another Ian, this time Ian Dunt, discusses The Politics of Drawing a Moral Line, sketching a parallel between events in Britain and the Ezra Klein interview with Ta-Nehisi Coates. By the way, I encourage you to listen to that interview. It’s not easy, but nothing is these days.
Chicago’s Neil Steinberg comments that Next, Dyeing the River Green Will Be Cast As A Terrorist Act. I don’t think he’s far off.
On the Artificial Intelligence front, what was bound to happen happened when OpenAI released Sora, its tool for creating short movies, or better yet (worse yet?) putting yourself into one. That followed quickly on the heels of the uproar over the creation of Tilly Norwood, an AI actress created out of bits and bytes, and her creator seeking talent agent representation. Hollywood producers and bean counters are thirsting over better bottom lines ahead. Maureen Dowd has an interesting look at When A.I. Came For Hollywood.
Meanwhile one of the tech overlords, Peter Thiel, is obsessed with the antichrist and thinks tech is the only way to keep whatever that is from destroying us all. Laura Bullard takes a look at what’s behind Thiel’s obsession. Don’t be surprised at where Thiel drew some of his inspiration in The Real States, and Real Story, of Peter Thiel’s Antichrist Obsession.
Continuing on the Artificial Intelligence beat, Bullsh*t Warning from John Warner, examines how to think about writing in the age of AI.
Mathew Ingram asks So What’s So Great About Reading Books?
And to wrap things up this week, take a look at Christopher Michael Hefner’s On Letting Go Of The Idea Of The Tortured Artist.
I included the image above from Fotgraf Petrova Olga on Shutterstock of an empty playground because I noticed this week that Chicago’s parks and playgrounds are empty of the laughter and life we usually experience due to ICE activity throughout the city before Winter begins to set in. There’s a different chill in the air this Fall.
If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here. If you’d like more click on the Sunday Morning Reading link in the category column to check out what’s been shared on Sunday’s past. You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.
#ai #bookReview #books #Chicago #Hollywood #ICE #NeilSteinberg #Poetry #politcs #reading #SundayMorningReading #TillyNorwood #Writing
-
Sunday Morning Reading
It’s a Sunday and that means it’s time for Sunday Morning Reading. Fall is beginning its march towards Winter, but the chill in the unusually warm Chicago temperatures this weekend aren’t weather related. Some of that is reflected in today’s selections as well as other topics, some that feed the soul, while others fuel the fires.
It’s tough to watch what’s going on in the streets of some of our cities and towns, and there’s no denying what Ian F. Blair points out That The United Police State of America Has Arrived.
Another Ian, this time Ian Dunt, discusses The Politics of Drawing a Moral Line, sketching a parallel between events in Britain and the Ezra Klein interview with Ta-Nehisi Coates. By the way, I encourage you to listen to that interview. It’s not easy, but nothing is these days.
Chicago’s Neil Steinberg comments that Next, Dyeing the River Green Will Be Cast As A Terrorist Act. I don’t think he’s far off.
On the Artificial Intelligence front, what was bound to happen happened when OpenAI released Sora, its tool for creating short movies, or better yet (worse yet?) putting yourself into one. That followed quickly on the heels of the uproar over the creation of Tilly Norwood, an AI actress created out of bits and bytes, and her creator seeking talent agent representation. Hollywood producers and bean counters are thirsting over better bottom lines ahead. Maureen Dowd has an interesting look at When A.I. Came For Hollywood.
Meanwhile one of the tech overlords, Peter Thiel, is obsessed with the antichrist and thinks tech is the only way to keep whatever that is from destroying us all. Laura Bullard takes a look at what’s behind Thiel’s obsession. Don’t be surprised at where Thiel drew some of his inspiration in The Real States, and Real Story, of Peter Thiel’s Antichrist Obsession.
Continuing on the Artificial Intelligence beat, Bullsh*t Warning from John Warner, examines how to think about writing in the age of AI.
Mathew Ingram asks So What’s So Great About Reading Books?
And to wrap things up this week, take a look at Christopher Michael Hefner’s On Letting Go Of The Idea Of The Tortured Artist.
I included the image above from Fotgraf Petrova Olga on Shutterstock of an empty playground because I noticed this week that Chicago’s parks and playgrounds are empty of the laughter and life we usually experience due to ICE activity throughout the city before Winter begins to set in. There’s a different chill in the air this Fall.
If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here. If you’d like more click on the Sunday Morning Reading link in the category column to check out what’s been shared on Sunday’s past. You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.
#ai #bookReview #books #Chicago #Hollywood #ICE #NeilSteinberg #Poetry #politcs #reading #SundayMorningReading #TillyNorwood #Writing
-
Sunday Morning Reading
It’s a Sunday and that means it’s time for Sunday Morning Reading. Fall is beginning its march towards Winter, but the chill in the unusually warm Chicago temperatures this weekend aren’t weather related. Some of that is reflected in today’s selections as well as other topics, some that feed the soul, while others fuel the fires.
It’s tough to watch what’s going on in the streets of some of our cities and towns, and there’s no denying what Ian F. Blair points out That The United Police State of America Has Arrived.
Another Ian, this time Ian Dunt, discusses The Politics of Drawing a Moral Line, sketching a parallel between events in Britain and the Ezra Klein interview with Ta-Nehisi Coates. By the way, I encourage you to listen to that interview. It’s not easy, but nothing is these days.
Chicago’s Neil Steinberg comments that Next, Dyeing the River Green Will Be Cast As A Terrorist Act. I don’t think he’s far off.
On the Artificial Intelligence front, what was bound to happen happened when OpenAI released Sora, its tool for creating short movies, or better yet (worse yet?) putting yourself into one. That followed quickly on the heels of the uproar over the creation of Tilly Norwood, an AI actress created out of bits and bytes, and her creator seeking talent agent representation. Hollywood producers and bean counters are thirsting over better bottom lines ahead. Maureen Dowd has an interesting look at When A.I. Came For Hollywood.
Meanwhile one of the tech overlords, Peter Thiel, is obsessed with the antichrist and thinks tech is the only way to keep whatever that is from destroying us all. Laura Bullard takes a look at what’s behind Thiel’s obsession. Don’t be surprised at where Thiel drew some of his inspiration in The Real States, and Real Story, of Peter Thiel’s Antichrist Obsession.
Continuing on the Artificial Intelligence beat, Bullsh*t Warning from John Warner, examines how to think about writing in the age of AI.
Mathew Ingram asks So What’s So Great About Reading Books?
And to wrap things up this week, take a look at Christopher Michael Hefner’s On Letting Go Of The Idea Of The Tortured Artist.
I included the image above from Fotgraf Petrova Olga on Shutterstock of an empty playground because I noticed this week that Chicago’s parks and playgrounds are empty of the laughter and life we usually experience due to ICE activity throughout the city before Winter begins to set in. There’s a different chill in the air this Fall.
If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here. If you’d like more click on the Sunday Morning Reading link in the category column to check out what’s been shared on Sunday’s past. You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.
#ai #bookReview #books #Chicago #Hollywood #ICE #NeilSteinberg #Poetry #politcs #reading #SundayMorningReading #TillyNorwood #Writing