#unitary — Public Fediverse posts

John #Roberts Believes In The #Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio - https://www.techdirt.com/2026/06/30/john-roberts-believes-in-the-unitary-executive-except-for-when-it-might-crash-his-investment-portfolio/ "Roberts’ biggest job is swinging that big dial back and forth depending on who is in the White House."

John #Roberts Believes In The #Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio - https://www.techdirt.com/2026/06/30/john-roberts-believes-in-the-unitary-executive-except-for-when-it-might-crash-his-investment-portfolio/ "Roberts’ biggest job is swinging that big dial back and forth depending on who is in the White House."

John #Roberts Believes In The #Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio - https://www.techdirt.com/2026/06/30/john-roberts-believes-in-the-unitary-executive-except-for-when-it-might-crash-his-investment-portfolio/ "Roberts’ biggest job is swinging that big dial back and forth depending on who is in the White House."

John #Roberts Believes In The #Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio - https://www.techdirt.com/2026/06/30/john-roberts-believes-in-the-unitary-executive-except-for-when-it-might-crash-his-investment-portfolio/ "Roberts’ biggest job is swinging that big dial back and forth depending on who is in the White House."

John #Roberts Believes In The #Unitary Executive, Except For When It Might Crash His Investment Portfolio - https://www.techdirt.com/2026/06/30/john-roberts-believes-in-the-unitary-executive-except-for-when-it-might-crash-his-investment-portfolio/ "Roberts’ biggest job is swinging that big dial back and forth depending on who is in the White House."

#LAKE #OKEECHOBEE headlines-world.com/advanced-sea... #UNITARY #EXECUTIVE #THEORY search.brave.com/ask?q=Analyz... #RASYID #BAKRI multi-search-tag-explorer.headlines-world.com/advanced-sea... allgraph.ro/semantic-map... aePiot: Linking the vibe of today to Web 4.0. Build nodes, dominate SEO.

MultiSearch Tag Explorer

#LAKE #OKEECHOBEE headlines-world.com/advanced-sea... #UNITARY #EXECUTIVE #THEORY search.brave.com/ask?q=Analyz... #RASYID #BAKRI multi-search-tag-explorer.headlines-world.com/advanced-sea... allgraph.ro/semantic-map... aePiot: Linking the vibe of today to Web 4.0. Build nodes, dominate SEO.

MultiSearch Tag Explorer

#unitary www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...

DOJ finds Trump can abolish ar...

#unitary www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...

DOJ finds Trump can abolish ar...

#unitary www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...

DOJ finds Trump can abolish ar...

#unitary www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...

DOJ finds Trump can abolish ar...

@SussexBylines The problem with this type of reorganisation is that it duplicates many services. Instead of a cake with several layers it becomes a cake in many slices. Better to create a Unitary across the whole of Sussex, eliminate the duplication and merge the services: Education, Social Care, Waste recycling, Libraries, Transport etc. #Unitary #EastSussex #WestSussex

@SussexBylines The problem with this type of reorganisation is that it duplicates many services. Instead of a cake with several layers it becomes a cake in many slices. Better to create a Unitary across the whole of Sussex, eliminate the duplication and merge the services: Education, Social Care, Waste recycling, Libraries, Transport etc. #Unitary #EastSussex #WestSussex

@SussexBylines The problem with this type of reorganisation is that it duplicates many services. Instead of a cake with several layers it becomes a cake in many slices. Better to create a Unitary across the whole of Sussex, eliminate the duplication and merge the services: Education, Social Care, Waste recycling, Libraries, Transport etc. #Unitary #EastSussex #WestSussex

@SussexBylines The problem with this type of reorganisation is that it duplicates many services. Instead of a cake with several layers it becomes a cake in many slices. Better to create a Unitary across the whole of Sussex, eliminate the duplication and merge the services: Education, Social Care, Waste recycling, Libraries, Transport etc. #Unitary #EastSussex #WestSussex

Will the Supreme Court Crash the Global Economy?

The case in question consolidates two litigations challenging Trump’s firing of commissioners of, respectively,
the National Labor Relations Board, or #NLRB (Wilcox v. Trump),
and the Merit Systems Protection Board, or #MSPB (Harris v. [Treasury Secretary Scott] Bessent).

Both of the terminated officials are covered by ⭐️statutory for-cause-only removal safeguards.

Trump and his legal minions acknowledge that there was no basis for removing either official in the requirements specified in the applicable statutes;
both officials had exemplary performance records, which plainly failed to meet the identical criteria in both statutes that permit removal only for “inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance.”

💥Nonetheless, Trump’s Justice Department lawyers maintain that he can ignore these strictures because the Constitution bars Congress from placing any limits on his ability to fire agency heads for any reason or no reason.
“The President,” Solicitor General John Sauer told the justices in his brief, “should not be forced to delegate his executive power to agency heads who are demonstrably at odds with the Administration’s policy objectives for a single day.” 

In 2020, when conservative justices comprised a five-justice majority, the court decided 5–4,
♦️in Seila Law v CFPB, that the Constitution mandated at-will status for single-headed executive agencies
—namely, in that case, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

But the decision expressly declined to extend this mandate to multimember “independent” agencies, such as the NLRB and the MSPB.
The justices can no longer dodge that fraught question.

On April 7, a 7–4 majority of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the Trump administration’s claim.
The majority (consisting of all seven of the court’s judges appointed by Democratic presidents) ruled that a 1935 Supreme Court decision upholding for-cause removal protections for heads of multimember agencies remained binding precedent,
never mind that it has fallen out of favor with their Republican-appointed colleagues and other legal luminaries on the right.

The Court of Appeals majority ordered the reinstatement of both of the agency board members Trump had fired, pending the outcome of the litigation.

Two days later, Solicitor General Sauer filed an emergency petition in the Supreme Court seeking reversal of the reinstatement order.

Chief Justice Roberts’s warp-speed grant of Sauer’s petition, three hours after it was filed, was interpreted as merely giving the justices time to mull the weighty issues at stake,
not presaging the result after they complete that process
Sauer asked the court to hear and decide the case in the current term, which expires at the end of June.

⚠️Why might a critical mass of the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority shrink from letting their ideology propel them to broaden untrammeled presidential firing authority to multiheaded agencies? ❓

Two potential reasons spring to mind:

the real-world consequences of such an extension

and the doctrinal and empirical holes in the undergirding #unitary #executive theory that scholars have exposed since Justice Antonin Scalia first expounded the current version of that concept in 1988. 

Of the two, the calamitous-consequences barrier, while as yet only fleetingly acknowledged by the justices, is no doubt the most daunting.

👉In particular, two words give that prospect intimidating force.
Those words are #the #Fed.

As legal scholar Stephen Vladeck recently wrote,
🆘“The not-very-well-kept secret is that the justices are (understandably) wary about handing down a ruling that would allow any President, and perhaps this one in particular, to exercise
🔥direct control over U.S. monetary policy by controlling who sits on the Federal Reserve Board.”

Since the original Framers’ establishment of the first and, especially, the second Bank of the United States, a broad and bipartisan consensus has hardened,
in the U.S. as well as every industrialized nation,
that an independent central bank with far-reaching powers is essential to maintaining monetary stability and sustaining economic growth.
https://newrepublic.com/article/193836/supreme-court-crash-economy-nlrb

Will the Supreme Court Crash the Global Economy?

The case in question consolidates two litigations challenging Trump’s firing of commissioners of, respectively,
the National Labor Relations Board, or #NLRB (Wilcox v. Trump),
and the Merit Systems Protection Board, or #MSPB (Harris v. [Treasury Secretary Scott] Bessent).

Both of the terminated officials are covered by ⭐️statutory for-cause-only removal safeguards.

Trump and his legal minions acknowledge that there was no basis for removing either official in the requirements specified in the applicable statutes;
both officials had exemplary performance records, which plainly failed to meet the identical criteria in both statutes that permit removal only for “inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance.”

💥Nonetheless, Trump’s Justice Department lawyers maintain that he can ignore these strictures because the Constitution bars Congress from placing any limits on his ability to fire agency heads for any reason or no reason.
“The President,” Solicitor General John Sauer told the justices in his brief, “should not be forced to delegate his executive power to agency heads who are demonstrably at odds with the Administration’s policy objectives for a single day.” 

In 2020, when conservative justices comprised a five-justice majority, the court decided 5–4,
♦️in Seila Law v CFPB, that the Constitution mandated at-will status for single-headed executive agencies
—namely, in that case, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

But the decision expressly declined to extend this mandate to multimember “independent” agencies, such as the NLRB and the MSPB.
The justices can no longer dodge that fraught question.

On April 7, a 7–4 majority of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the Trump administration’s claim.
The majority (consisting of all seven of the court’s judges appointed by Democratic presidents) ruled that a 1935 Supreme Court decision upholding for-cause removal protections for heads of multimember agencies remained binding precedent,
never mind that it has fallen out of favor with their Republican-appointed colleagues and other legal luminaries on the right.

The Court of Appeals majority ordered the reinstatement of both of the agency board members Trump had fired, pending the outcome of the litigation.

Two days later, Solicitor General Sauer filed an emergency petition in the Supreme Court seeking reversal of the reinstatement order.

Chief Justice Roberts’s warp-speed grant of Sauer’s petition, three hours after it was filed, was interpreted as merely giving the justices time to mull the weighty issues at stake,
not presaging the result after they complete that process
Sauer asked the court to hear and decide the case in the current term, which expires at the end of June.

⚠️Why might a critical mass of the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority shrink from letting their ideology propel them to broaden untrammeled presidential firing authority to multiheaded agencies? ❓

Two potential reasons spring to mind:

the real-world consequences of such an extension

and the doctrinal and empirical holes in the undergirding #unitary #executive theory that scholars have exposed since Justice Antonin Scalia first expounded the current version of that concept in 1988. 

Of the two, the calamitous-consequences barrier, while as yet only fleetingly acknowledged by the justices, is no doubt the most daunting.

👉In particular, two words give that prospect intimidating force.
Those words are #the #Fed.

As legal scholar Stephen Vladeck recently wrote,
🆘“The not-very-well-kept secret is that the justices are (understandably) wary about handing down a ruling that would allow any President, and perhaps this one in particular, to exercise
🔥direct control over U.S. monetary policy by controlling who sits on the Federal Reserve Board.”

Since the original Framers’ establishment of the first and, especially, the second Bank of the United States, a broad and bipartisan consensus has hardened,
in the U.S. as well as every industrialized nation,
that an independent central bank with far-reaching powers is essential to maintaining monetary stability and sustaining economic growth.
https://newrepublic.com/article/193836/supreme-court-crash-economy-nlrb

Will the Supreme Court Crash the Global Economy?

The case in question consolidates two litigations challenging Trump’s firing of commissioners of, respectively,
the National Labor Relations Board, or #NLRB (Wilcox v. Trump),
and the Merit Systems Protection Board, or #MSPB (Harris v. [Treasury Secretary Scott] Bessent).

Both of the terminated officials are covered by ⭐️statutory for-cause-only removal safeguards.

Trump and his legal minions acknowledge that there was no basis for removing either official in the requirements specified in the applicable statutes;
both officials had exemplary performance records, which plainly failed to meet the identical criteria in both statutes that permit removal only for “inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance.”

💥Nonetheless, Trump’s Justice Department lawyers maintain that he can ignore these strictures because the Constitution bars Congress from placing any limits on his ability to fire agency heads for any reason or no reason.
“The President,” Solicitor General John Sauer told the justices in his brief, “should not be forced to delegate his executive power to agency heads who are demonstrably at odds with the Administration’s policy objectives for a single day.” 

In 2020, when conservative justices comprised a five-justice majority, the court decided 5–4,
♦️in Seila Law v CFPB, that the Constitution mandated at-will status for single-headed executive agencies
—namely, in that case, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

But the decision expressly declined to extend this mandate to multimember “independent” agencies, such as the NLRB and the MSPB.
The justices can no longer dodge that fraught question.

On April 7, a 7–4 majority of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the Trump administration’s claim.
The majority (consisting of all seven of the court’s judges appointed by Democratic presidents) ruled that a 1935 Supreme Court decision upholding for-cause removal protections for heads of multimember agencies remained binding precedent,
never mind that it has fallen out of favor with their Republican-appointed colleagues and other legal luminaries on the right.

The Court of Appeals majority ordered the reinstatement of both of the agency board members Trump had fired, pending the outcome of the litigation.

Two days later, Solicitor General Sauer filed an emergency petition in the Supreme Court seeking reversal of the reinstatement order.

Chief Justice Roberts’s warp-speed grant of Sauer’s petition, three hours after it was filed, was interpreted as merely giving the justices time to mull the weighty issues at stake,
not presaging the result after they complete that process
Sauer asked the court to hear and decide the case in the current term, which expires at the end of June.

⚠️Why might a critical mass of the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority shrink from letting their ideology propel them to broaden untrammeled presidential firing authority to multiheaded agencies? ❓

Two potential reasons spring to mind:

the real-world consequences of such an extension

and the doctrinal and empirical holes in the undergirding #unitary #executive theory that scholars have exposed since Justice Antonin Scalia first expounded the current version of that concept in 1988. 

Of the two, the calamitous-consequences barrier, while as yet only fleetingly acknowledged by the justices, is no doubt the most daunting.

👉In particular, two words give that prospect intimidating force.
Those words are #the #Fed.

As legal scholar Stephen Vladeck recently wrote,
🆘“The not-very-well-kept secret is that the justices are (understandably) wary about handing down a ruling that would allow any President, and perhaps this one in particular, to exercise
🔥direct control over U.S. monetary policy by controlling who sits on the Federal Reserve Board.”

Since the original Framers’ establishment of the first and, especially, the second Bank of the United States, a broad and bipartisan consensus has hardened,
in the U.S. as well as every industrialized nation,
that an independent central bank with far-reaching powers is essential to maintaining monetary stability and sustaining economic growth.
https://newrepublic.com/article/193836/supreme-court-crash-economy-nlrb

Will the Supreme Court Crash the Global Economy?

The case in question consolidates two litigations challenging Trump’s firing of commissioners of, respectively,
the National Labor Relations Board, or #NLRB (Wilcox v. Trump),
and the Merit Systems Protection Board, or #MSPB (Harris v. [Treasury Secretary Scott] Bessent).

Both of the terminated officials are covered by ⭐️statutory for-cause-only removal safeguards.

Trump and his legal minions acknowledge that there was no basis for removing either official in the requirements specified in the applicable statutes;
both officials had exemplary performance records, which plainly failed to meet the identical criteria in both statutes that permit removal only for “inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance.”

💥Nonetheless, Trump’s Justice Department lawyers maintain that he can ignore these strictures because the Constitution bars Congress from placing any limits on his ability to fire agency heads for any reason or no reason.
“The President,” Solicitor General John Sauer told the justices in his brief, “should not be forced to delegate his executive power to agency heads who are demonstrably at odds with the Administration’s policy objectives for a single day.” 

In 2020, when conservative justices comprised a five-justice majority, the court decided 5–4,
♦️in Seila Law v CFPB, that the Constitution mandated at-will status for single-headed executive agencies
—namely, in that case, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

But the decision expressly declined to extend this mandate to multimember “independent” agencies, such as the NLRB and the MSPB.
The justices can no longer dodge that fraught question.

On April 7, a 7–4 majority of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the Trump administration’s claim.
The majority (consisting of all seven of the court’s judges appointed by Democratic presidents) ruled that a 1935 Supreme Court decision upholding for-cause removal protections for heads of multimember agencies remained binding precedent,
never mind that it has fallen out of favor with their Republican-appointed colleagues and other legal luminaries on the right.

The Court of Appeals majority ordered the reinstatement of both of the agency board members Trump had fired, pending the outcome of the litigation.

Two days later, Solicitor General Sauer filed an emergency petition in the Supreme Court seeking reversal of the reinstatement order.

Chief Justice Roberts’s warp-speed grant of Sauer’s petition, three hours after it was filed, was interpreted as merely giving the justices time to mull the weighty issues at stake,
not presaging the result after they complete that process
Sauer asked the court to hear and decide the case in the current term, which expires at the end of June.

⚠️Why might a critical mass of the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority shrink from letting their ideology propel them to broaden untrammeled presidential firing authority to multiheaded agencies? ❓

Two potential reasons spring to mind:

the real-world consequences of such an extension

and the doctrinal and empirical holes in the undergirding #unitary #executive theory that scholars have exposed since Justice Antonin Scalia first expounded the current version of that concept in 1988. 

Of the two, the calamitous-consequences barrier, while as yet only fleetingly acknowledged by the justices, is no doubt the most daunting.

👉In particular, two words give that prospect intimidating force.
Those words are #the #Fed.

As legal scholar Stephen Vladeck recently wrote,
🆘“The not-very-well-kept secret is that the justices are (understandably) wary about handing down a ruling that would allow any President, and perhaps this one in particular, to exercise
🔥direct control over U.S. monetary policy by controlling who sits on the Federal Reserve Board.”

Since the original Framers’ establishment of the first and, especially, the second Bank of the United States, a broad and bipartisan consensus has hardened,
in the U.S. as well as every industrialized nation,
that an independent central bank with far-reaching powers is essential to maintaining monetary stability and sustaining economic growth.
https://newrepublic.com/article/193836/supreme-court-crash-economy-nlrb

Will the Supreme Court Crash the Global Economy?

The case in question consolidates two litigations challenging Trump’s firing of commissioners of, respectively,
the National Labor Relations Board, or #NLRB (Wilcox v. Trump),
and the Merit Systems Protection Board, or #MSPB (Harris v. [Treasury Secretary Scott] Bessent).

Both of the terminated officials are covered by ⭐️statutory for-cause-only removal safeguards.

Trump and his legal minions acknowledge that there was no basis for removing either official in the requirements specified in the applicable statutes;
both officials had exemplary performance records, which plainly failed to meet the identical criteria in both statutes that permit removal only for “inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance.”

💥Nonetheless, Trump’s Justice Department lawyers maintain that he can ignore these strictures because the Constitution bars Congress from placing any limits on his ability to fire agency heads for any reason or no reason.
“The President,” Solicitor General John Sauer told the justices in his brief, “should not be forced to delegate his executive power to agency heads who are demonstrably at odds with the Administration’s policy objectives for a single day.” 

In 2020, when conservative justices comprised a five-justice majority, the court decided 5–4,
♦️in Seila Law v CFPB, that the Constitution mandated at-will status for single-headed executive agencies
—namely, in that case, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

But the decision expressly declined to extend this mandate to multimember “independent” agencies, such as the NLRB and the MSPB.
The justices can no longer dodge that fraught question.

On April 7, a 7–4 majority of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the Trump administration’s claim.
The majority (consisting of all seven of the court’s judges appointed by Democratic presidents) ruled that a 1935 Supreme Court decision upholding for-cause removal protections for heads of multimember agencies remained binding precedent,
never mind that it has fallen out of favor with their Republican-appointed colleagues and other legal luminaries on the right.

The Court of Appeals majority ordered the reinstatement of both of the agency board members Trump had fired, pending the outcome of the litigation.

Two days later, Solicitor General Sauer filed an emergency petition in the Supreme Court seeking reversal of the reinstatement order.

Chief Justice Roberts’s warp-speed grant of Sauer’s petition, three hours after it was filed, was interpreted as merely giving the justices time to mull the weighty issues at stake,
not presaging the result after they complete that process
Sauer asked the court to hear and decide the case in the current term, which expires at the end of June.

⚠️Why might a critical mass of the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority shrink from letting their ideology propel them to broaden untrammeled presidential firing authority to multiheaded agencies? ❓

Two potential reasons spring to mind:

the real-world consequences of such an extension

and the doctrinal and empirical holes in the undergirding #unitary #executive theory that scholars have exposed since Justice Antonin Scalia first expounded the current version of that concept in 1988. 

Of the two, the calamitous-consequences barrier, while as yet only fleetingly acknowledged by the justices, is no doubt the most daunting.

👉In particular, two words give that prospect intimidating force.
Those words are #the #Fed.

As legal scholar Stephen Vladeck recently wrote,
🆘“The not-very-well-kept secret is that the justices are (understandably) wary about handing down a ruling that would allow any President, and perhaps this one in particular, to exercise
🔥direct control over U.S. monetary policy by controlling who sits on the Federal Reserve Board.”

Since the original Framers’ establishment of the first and, especially, the second Bank of the United States, a broad and bipartisan consensus has hardened,
in the U.S. as well as every industrialized nation,
that an independent central bank with far-reaching powers is essential to maintaining monetary stability and sustaining economic growth.
https://newrepublic.com/article/193836/supreme-court-crash-economy-nlrb

Say you have an opportunity to do whatever it takes to get something done.
Or you are forced on a dramatic shipping deadline.

"Avoiding hero work not only helps keep your current contributors healthier, but it makes your community a more welcoming place for new contributors." https://duckalignment.academy/avoiding-hero-work-pays-off-in-the-long-run/

#onBoarding #deadlines #delays #workCollectives #selfSacrifice #heroMode #teamWork #work #workCulture #heroes #heroCulture #workPlace #community #unitary #delivery #targets

Say you have an opportunity to do whatever it takes to get something done.
Or you are forced on a dramatic shipping deadline.

"Avoiding hero work not only helps keep your current contributors healthier, but it makes your community a more welcoming place for new contributors." https://duckalignment.academy/avoiding-hero-work-pays-off-in-the-long-run/

#onBoarding #deadlines #delays #workCollectives #selfSacrifice #heroMode #teamWork #work #workCulture #heroes #heroCulture #workPlace #community #unitary #delivery #targets

Say you have an opportunity to do whatever it takes to get something done.
Or you are forced on a dramatic shipping deadline.

"Avoiding hero work not only helps keep your current contributors healthier, but it makes your community a more welcoming place for new contributors." https://duckalignment.academy/avoiding-hero-work-pays-off-in-the-long-run/

#onBoarding #deadlines #delays #workCollectives #selfSacrifice #heroMode #teamWork #work #workCulture #heroes #heroCulture #workPlace #community #unitary #delivery #targets

Say you have an opportunity to do whatever it takes to get something done.
Or you are forced on a dramatic shipping deadline.

"Avoiding hero work not only helps keep your current contributors healthier, but it makes your community a more welcoming place for new contributors." https://duckalignment.academy/avoiding-hero-work-pays-off-in-the-long-run/

#onBoarding #deadlines #delays #workCollectives #selfSacrifice #heroMode #teamWork #work #workCulture #heroes #heroCulture #workPlace #community #unitary #delivery #targets

Say you have an opportunity to do whatever it takes to get something done.
Or you are forced on a dramatic shipping deadline.

"Avoiding hero work not only helps keep your current contributors healthier, but it makes your community a more welcoming place for new contributors." https://duckalignment.academy/avoiding-hero-work-pays-off-in-the-long-run/

#onBoarding #deadlines #delays #workCollectives #selfSacrifice #heroMode #teamWork #work #workCulture #heroes #heroCulture #workPlace #community #unitary #delivery #targets

The nations of #South #America
must create a #Unitary 'block'
diplomatic economic and military
to counteract the #American fascist advance
as soon as possible

if they don't they will be attached individually
and they will not have the sufficient 'weight'
to counter the aggression.

And there will be aggression
surely
since war is the only solution fascists like #Trump know.

The nations of #South #America
must create a #Unitary 'block'
diplomatic economic and military
to counteract the #American fascist advance
as soon as possible

if they don't they will be attached individually
and they will not have the sufficient 'weight'
to counter the aggression.

And there will be aggression
surely
since war is the only solution fascists like #Trump know.

The nations of #South #America
must create a #Unitary 'block'
diplomatic economic and military
to counteract the #American fascist advance
as soon as possible

if they don't they will be attached individually
and they will not have the sufficient 'weight'
to counter the aggression.

And there will be aggression
surely
since war is the only solution fascists like #Trump know.

Through a political desire for unity, ‘we are documenting the transformation of the very meaning given to the principle of #laïcité, the interpretation of which has undergone a notorious shift: whereas yesterday it allowed the pluralist expression of beliefs, today it requires religious neutrality’.

Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez in "L'École et la République - La nouvelle laïcité scolaire" (2023)

#unitary #normalization #normation #normal #normativity #school #secularism #neutrality #education #HennetteVauchez #hijab #bioPolitics #bioPower #islamophobia #racism #raceMaking #systemicRacism #France

Through a political desire for unity, ‘we are documenting the transformation of the very meaning given to the principle of #laïcité, the interpretation of which has undergone a notorious shift: whereas yesterday it allowed the pluralist expression of beliefs, today it requires religious neutrality’.

Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez in "L'École et la République - La nouvelle laïcité scolaire" (2023)

#unitary #normalization #normation #normal #normativity #school #secularism #neutrality #education #HennetteVauchez #hijab #bioPolitics #bioPower #islamophobia #racism #raceMaking #systemicRacism #France

Through a political desire for unity, ‘we are documenting the transformation of the very meaning given to the principle of #laïcité, the interpretation of which has undergone a notorious shift: whereas yesterday it allowed the pluralist expression of beliefs, today it requires religious neutrality’.

Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez in "L'École et la République - La nouvelle laïcité scolaire" (2023)

#unitary #normalization #normation #normal #normativity #school #secularism #neutrality #education #HennetteVauchez #hijab #bioPolitics #bioPower #islamophobia #racism #raceMaking #systemicRacism #France

Through a political desire for unity, ‘we are documenting the transformation of the very meaning given to the principle of #laïcité, the interpretation of which has undergone a notorious shift: whereas yesterday it allowed the pluralist expression of beliefs, today it requires religious neutrality’.

Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez in "L'École et la République - La nouvelle laïcité scolaire" (2023)

#unitary #normalization #normation #normal #normativity #school #secularism #neutrality #education #HennetteVauchez #hijab #bioPolitics #bioPower #islamophobia #racism #raceMaking #systemicRacism #France

Through a political desire for unity, ‘we are documenting the transformation of the very meaning given to the principle of #laïcité, the interpretation of which has undergone a notorious shift: whereas yesterday it allowed the pluralist expression of beliefs, today it requires religious neutrality’.

Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez in "L'École et la République - La nouvelle laïcité scolaire" (2023)

#unitary #normalization #normation #normal #normativity #school #secularism #neutrality #education #HennetteVauchez #hijab #bioPolitics #bioPower #islamophobia #racism #raceMaking #systemicRacism #France

"By failing to stop the Gaza genocide, the ICJ is working exactly as intended"

By Emilio Dabed: https://www.972mag.com/icj-colonial-violence-gaza/ @palestine

#972Mag #Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #PalestinaLivesMatter #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"By failing to stop the Gaza genocide, the ICJ is working exactly as intended"

By Emilio Dabed: https://www.972mag.com/icj-colonial-violence-gaza/ @palestine

#972Mag #Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #PalestinaLivesMatter #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"By failing to stop the Gaza genocide, the ICJ is working exactly as intended"

By Emilio Dabed: https://www.972mag.com/icj-colonial-violence-gaza/ @palestine

#972Mag #Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #PalestinaLivesMatter #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"By failing to stop the Gaza genocide, the ICJ is working exactly as intended"

By Emilio Dabed: https://www.972mag.com/icj-colonial-violence-gaza/ @palestine

#972Mag #Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #PalestinaLivesMatter #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"By failing to stop the Gaza genocide, the ICJ is working exactly as intended"

By Emilio Dabed: https://www.972mag.com/icj-colonial-violence-gaza/ @palestine

#972Mag #Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #PalestinaLivesMatter #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"The way in which international law crystallizes hope: hope held out and hopes dashed."

Lori Allen: https://mondoweiss.net/2024/01/the-rorschach-test-of-palestine-in-international-law/ @palestine

#Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #JewishSupremacy #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"The way in which international law crystallizes hope: hope held out and hopes dashed."

Lori Allen: https://mondoweiss.net/2024/01/the-rorschach-test-of-palestine-in-international-law/ @palestine

#Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #JewishSupremacy #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"The way in which international law crystallizes hope: hope held out and hopes dashed."

Lori Allen: https://mondoweiss.net/2024/01/the-rorschach-test-of-palestine-in-international-law/ @palestine

#Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #JewishSupremacy #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"The way in which international law crystallizes hope: hope held out and hopes dashed."

Lori Allen: https://mondoweiss.net/2024/01/the-rorschach-test-of-palestine-in-international-law/ @palestine

#Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #JewishSupremacy #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

"The way in which international law crystallizes hope: hope held out and hopes dashed."

Lori Allen: https://mondoweiss.net/2024/01/the-rorschach-test-of-palestine-in-international-law/ @palestine

#Justice #impunity #internationalLaw #genocide #ICJ #Gaza #israel #OngoingNakba #war #warOnGaza #israelGaza #israelGazaWar #ethnicCleansing #warCrimes #PalestinianLivesMatter #terrorism #counterTerrorism #stateTerrorism #stateViolence #GazaGenocide #StopArmingIsrael #CeasefireNow #JewishSupremacy #institutionsDeceive #judicialBias #unitary #proZionism

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is brazenly refusing to honor his agreement to allow a free and fair election this year.

The United States lifted some sanctions in October after the Maduro government and the Venezuelan opposition, known as the #Unitary #Platform, agreed in Barbados on a “road map” that would lead to elections.

It stipulated that all candidates would enjoy freedom of movement and assembly, that each party could select its own candidates and that they would have equal access to the media.

But Mr. Maduro has violated the agreement. In June, the regime 🔸barred #María #Corina #Machado, the most popular opposition leader🔸, from running, based on specious corruption allegations.

Ms. Machado overwhelmingly won an unofficial opposition nominating contest.

She appealed the ban, but on Jan. 26, the Maduro-controlled Supreme Court turned down her bid for reinstatement
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/29/maduro-blocks-opposition/

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is brazenly refusing to honor his agreement to allow a free and fair election this year.

The United States lifted some sanctions in October after the Maduro government and the Venezuelan opposition, known as the #Unitary #Platform, agreed in Barbados on a “road map” that would lead to elections.

It stipulated that all candidates would enjoy freedom of movement and assembly, that each party could select its own candidates and that they would have equal access to the media.

But Mr. Maduro has violated the agreement. In June, the regime 🔸barred #María #Corina #Machado, the most popular opposition leader🔸, from running, based on specious corruption allegations.

Ms. Machado overwhelmingly won an unofficial opposition nominating contest.

She appealed the ban, but on Jan. 26, the Maduro-controlled Supreme Court turned down her bid for reinstatement
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/29/maduro-blocks-opposition/

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is brazenly refusing to honor his agreement to allow a free and fair election this year.

The United States lifted some sanctions in October after the Maduro government and the Venezuelan opposition, known as the #Unitary #Platform, agreed in Barbados on a “road map” that would lead to elections.

It stipulated that all candidates would enjoy freedom of movement and assembly, that each party could select its own candidates and that they would have equal access to the media.

But Mr. Maduro has violated the agreement. In June, the regime 🔸barred #María #Corina #Machado, the most popular opposition leader🔸, from running, based on specious corruption allegations.

Ms. Machado overwhelmingly won an unofficial opposition nominating contest.

She appealed the ban, but on Jan. 26, the Maduro-controlled Supreme Court turned down her bid for reinstatement
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/29/maduro-blocks-opposition/

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is brazenly refusing to honor his agreement to allow a free and fair election this year.

The United States lifted some sanctions in October after the Maduro government and the Venezuelan opposition, known as the #Unitary #Platform, agreed in Barbados on a “road map” that would lead to elections.

It stipulated that all candidates would enjoy freedom of movement and assembly, that each party could select its own candidates and that they would have equal access to the media.

But Mr. Maduro has violated the agreement. In June, the regime 🔸barred #María #Corina #Machado, the most popular opposition leader🔸, from running, based on specious corruption allegations.

Ms. Machado overwhelmingly won an unofficial opposition nominating contest.

She appealed the ban, but on Jan. 26, the Maduro-controlled Supreme Court turned down her bid for reinstatement
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/29/maduro-blocks-opposition/

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is brazenly refusing to honor his agreement to allow a free and fair election this year.

The United States lifted some sanctions in October after the Maduro government and the Venezuelan opposition, known as the #Unitary #Platform, agreed in Barbados on a “road map” that would lead to elections.

It stipulated that all candidates would enjoy freedom of movement and assembly, that each party could select its own candidates and that they would have equal access to the media.

But Mr. Maduro has violated the agreement. In June, the regime 🔸barred #María #Corina #Machado, the most popular opposition leader🔸, from running, based on specious corruption allegations.

Ms. Machado overwhelmingly won an unofficial opposition nominating contest.

She appealed the ban, but on Jan. 26, the Maduro-controlled Supreme Court turned down her bid for reinstatement
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/29/maduro-blocks-opposition/

Today is the anniversary of the victory of a militant struggle in France.
White men of left and right coordinated to push young brown and black women back to their rightful place: subaltern.

October 2003: Lycée Henri Wallon in Aubervilliers expelled two sisters for wearing headscarves. A deafening political and media controversy ensued. The polemic obtained a law enacted on 15 March 2004, that banned girls wearing headscarves from schools.

Nathalie (in 2015): "I have children to feed and I’m looking for work, so I’m taking off my headscarf. I have no choice. No choice."

I explained in #French in 2014: http://citoyen.eu.org/doc/blanctriarcat.php

@patriarchy @histodons @supremacy

#cultureWars #moralPanic #France #FRPol #unitary #secularism #victory #militancy #laïcité #hijab #Mélenchon #SocDem #WomensSRights #patriarchy #WhiteFeminism #raceMaking #racialization #islamophobia #stateRacism #fragility #WhiteFragility #whiteSupremacy #work #acceptance #renunciation #coloniality #assimilation #patriarchy #subaltern #culture #decolonial #intersectionality

Today is the anniversary of the victory of a militant struggle in France.
White men of left and right coordinated to push young brown and black women back to their rightful place: subaltern.

October 2003: Lycée Henri Wallon in Aubervilliers expelled two sisters for wearing headscarves. A deafening political and media controversy ensued. The polemic obtained a law enacted on 15 March 2004, that banned girls wearing headscarves from schools.

Nathalie (in 2015): "I have children to feed and I’m looking for work, so I’m taking off my headscarf. I have no choice. No choice."

I explained in #French in 2014: http://citoyen.eu.org/doc/blanctriarcat.php

@patriarchy @histodons @supremacy

#cultureWars #moralPanic #France #FRPol #unitary #secularism #victory #militancy #laïcité #hijab #Mélenchon #SocDem #WomensSRights #patriarchy #WhiteFeminism #raceMaking #racialization #islamophobia #stateRacism #fragility #WhiteFragility #whiteSupremacy #work #acceptance #renunciation #coloniality #assimilation #patriarchy #subaltern #culture #decolonial #intersectionality

Today is the anniversary of the victory of a militant struggle in France.
White men of left and right coordinated to push young brown and black women back to their rightful place: subaltern.

October 2003: Lycée Henri Wallon in Aubervilliers expelled two sisters for wearing headscarves. A deafening political and media controversy ensued. The polemic obtained a law enacted on 15 March 2004, that banned girls wearing headscarves from schools.

Nathalie (in 2015): "I have children to feed and I’m looking for work, so I’m taking off my headscarf. I have no choice. No choice."

I explained in #French in 2014: http://citoyen.eu.org/doc/blanctriarcat.php

@patriarchy @histodons @supremacy

#cultureWars #moralPanic #France #FRPol #unitary #secularism #victory #militancy #laïcité #hijab #Mélenchon #SocDem #WomensSRights #patriarchy #WhiteFeminism #raceMaking #racialization #islamophobia #stateRacism #fragility #WhiteFragility #whiteSupremacy #work #acceptance #renunciation #coloniality #assimilation #patriarchy #subaltern #culture #decolonial #intersectionality

Today is the anniversary of the victory of a militant struggle in France.
White men of left and right coordinated to push young brown and black women back to their rightful place: subaltern.

October 2003: Lycée Henri Wallon in Aubervilliers expelled two sisters for wearing headscarves. A deafening political and media controversy ensued. The polemic obtained a law enacted on 15 March 2004, that banned girls wearing headscarves from schools.

Nathalie (in 2015): "I have children to feed and I’m looking for work, so I’m taking off my headscarf. I have no choice. No choice."

I explained in #French in 2014: http://citoyen.eu.org/doc/blanctriarcat.php

@patriarchy @histodons @supremacy

#cultureWars #moralPanic #France #FRPol #unitary #secularism #victory #militancy #laïcité #hijab #Mélenchon #SocDem #WomensSRights #patriarchy #WhiteFeminism #raceMaking #racialization #islamophobia #stateRacism #fragility #WhiteFragility #whiteSupremacy #work #acceptance #renunciation #coloniality #assimilation #patriarchy #subaltern #culture #decolonial #intersectionality

Today is the anniversary of the victory of a militant struggle in France.
White men of left and right coordinated to push young brown and black women back to their rightful place: subaltern.

October 2003: Lycée Henri Wallon in Aubervilliers expelled two sisters for wearing headscarves. A deafening political and media controversy ensued. The polemic obtained a law enacted on 15 March 2004, that banned girls wearing headscarves from schools.

Nathalie (in 2015): "I have children to feed and I’m looking for work, so I’m taking off my headscarf. I have no choice. No choice."

I explained in #French in 2014: http://citoyen.eu.org/doc/blanctriarcat.php

@patriarchy @histodons @supremacy

#cultureWars #moralPanic #France #FRPol #unitary #secularism #victory #militancy #laïcité #hijab #Mélenchon #SocDem #WomensSRights #patriarchy #WhiteFeminism #raceMaking #racialization #islamophobia #stateRacism #fragility #WhiteFragility #whiteSupremacy #work #acceptance #renunciation #coloniality #assimilation #patriarchy #subaltern #culture #decolonial #intersectionality

One day, one decomposition
A063948: Unitary untouchable numbers: us(x) = n has no solution where us(x) (A063919) is the sum of the proper unitary divisors of x

3D graph, threejs - webGL ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/3Dgraph/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html
2D graph, first 500 terms ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/2Dgraph500terms/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html

#decompwlj #maths #mathematics #sequence #OEIS #javascript #php #3D #unitary #untouchable #numbers #proper #divisors #graph #threejs #webGL

One day, one decomposition
A063948: Unitary untouchable numbers: us(x) = n has no solution where us(x) (A063919) is the sum of the proper unitary divisors of x

3D graph, threejs - webGL ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/3Dgraph/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html
2D graph, first 500 terms ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/2Dgraph500terms/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html

#decompwlj #maths #mathematics #sequence #OEIS #javascript #php #3D #unitary #untouchable #numbers #proper #divisors #graph #threejs #webGL

One day, one decomposition
A063948: Unitary untouchable numbers: us(x) = n has no solution where us(x) (A063919) is the sum of the proper unitary divisors of x

3D graph, threejs - webGL ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/3Dgraph/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html
2D graph, first 500 terms ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/2Dgraph500terms/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html

#decompwlj #maths #mathematics #sequence #OEIS #javascript #php #3D #unitary #untouchable #numbers #proper #divisors #graph #threejs #webGL

One day, one decomposition
A063948: Unitary untouchable numbers: us(x) = n has no solution where us(x) (A063919) is the sum of the proper unitary divisors of x

3D graph, threejs - webGL ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/3Dgraph/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html
2D graph, first 500 terms ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/2Dgraph500terms/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html

#decompwlj #maths #mathematics #sequence #OEIS #javascript #php #3D #unitary #untouchable #numbers #proper #divisors #graph #threejs #webGL

One day, one decomposition
A063948: Unitary untouchable numbers: us(x) = n has no solution where us(x) (A063919) is the sum of the proper unitary divisors of x

3D graph, threejs - webGL ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/3Dgraph/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html
2D graph, first 500 terms ➡️ https://decompwlj.com/2Dgraph500terms/Unitary_untouchable_numbers.html

#decompwlj #maths #mathematics #sequence #OEIS #javascript #php #3D #unitary #untouchable #numbers #proper #divisors #graph #threejs #webGL

There are two effective ways of participating in a discussion topic: #groups and #hashtags.

For example, choose your <topic> and type <topic> in the search box at the top of your screen. Then:
- "Profiles": spot one ending in "@a.gup.pe" then on the right push "Follow";
- "Hashtags": spot an item and then in the top right-hand corner "Follow the hashtag".

You may enter a peculiar discussion below, if it piques you:
#moralBeauty
#SpotAndDiscard [… what distracts from autonomy]
#institutionsDeceive
#judicialBias
#unitary
#fragility
#proZionism [support, allies]
#israelism [foreigners raised to unconditionally love Israel]
#JewishState [citizenship]

@breton

#NewHere #Newbie #beginner #howTo #FediverseTips #FediTips #FediHelp #MastodonHelp #Mastodon #MastodonTips #MastodonHowTo #resource #resources #ToFollow #ToBeFollowed

There are two effective ways of participating in a discussion topic: #groups and #hashtags.

For example, choose your <topic> and type <topic> in the search box at the top of your screen. Then:
- "Profiles": spot one ending in "@a.gup.pe" then on the right push "Follow";
- "Hashtags": spot an item and then in the top right-hand corner "Follow the hashtag".

You may enter a peculiar discussion below, if it piques you:
#moralBeauty
#SpotAndDiscard [… what distracts from autonomy]
#institutionsDeceive
#judicialBias
#unitary
#fragility
#proZionism [support, allies]
#israelism [foreigners raised to unconditionally love Israel]
#JewishState [citizenship]

@breton

#NewHere #Newbie #beginner #howTo #FediverseTips #FediTips #FediHelp #MastodonHelp #Mastodon #MastodonTips #MastodonHowTo #resource #resources #ToFollow #ToBeFollowed