home.social

#taliban — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #taliban, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Are the perpetrators men or the Taliban? Perhaps these da'wah bros are so insecure about their own and their brethren's masculinity, and unwilling to admit complicity in state violence because of the perceived sweeping statement against men in particular. I mean, if you have the energy to not-all-men state violence against women, then you should have the answer or justification for why it is only against women and what exactly you have done to prevent state violence. When blatant misogyny becomes a proper policy, then these men's mental gymnastics to disassociate themselves from the state apparatus are only that, mental gymnastics, nothing more and nothing less.

    HOWEVER, at the same time, this is something we should tread carefully on. What's happening in Iran started from the West's paternalistic rubbish and the Iranian diaspora being imperial agents; it doesn't mean state violence doesn't exist there. The violence is real; the instrumentalisation of that violence for imperial ends is also real. Both are true simultaneously. Everyone engaging in this conversation carries a responsibility to know what they are consenting to. With that in mind, speaking for Afghan women now requires answering: toward what end, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching this particular audience at this particular moment.

    Afghan women, all Muslim women, WE deserve more than allies who speak for us and think that's enough solidarity. Speaking for Afghan women is the bare minimum. Any Zionist American disinformation agency, Gulf state with its petrodollar interests, the Russian state, any external power structures that historically had a hand in atrocities in Afghanistan can very well pay many of you to SPEAK FOR AFGHAN WOMEN. What they won't be doing is disclosing the motive behind speaking up.

    So tell me, what about Afghan women's liberation do you imagine when speaking up for them, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching a wider audience at this particular moment?

    Don't project the reality where Muslims are a minority onto the discourse either. That framing is irrelevant. Muslims are the dominant group in Afghanistan. Use your class analysis. Deconstruct that latent Orientalism that latches onto your leftism while you're at it.

    #Afghanistan #politics #Iran #Taliban #imperialism #paternalism #Muslimwomen #Muslima #womensrights #zionism #misogyny

  2. Are the perpetrators men or the Taliban? Perhaps these da'wah bros are so insecure about their own and their brethren's masculinity, and unwilling to admit complicity in state violence because of the perceived sweeping statement against men in particular. I mean, if you have the energy to not-all-men state violence against women, then you should have the answer or justification for why it is only against women and what exactly you have done to prevent state violence. When blatant misogyny becomes a proper policy, then these men's mental gymnastics to disassociate themselves from the state apparatus are only that, mental gymnastics, nothing more and nothing less.

    HOWEVER, at the same time, this is something we should tread carefully on. What's happening in Iran started from the West's paternalistic rubbish and the Iranian diaspora being imperial agents; it doesn't mean state violence doesn't exist there. The violence is real; the instrumentalisation of that violence for imperial ends is also real. Both are true simultaneously. Everyone engaging in this conversation carries a responsibility to know what they are consenting to. With that in mind, speaking for Afghan women now requires answering: toward what end, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching this particular audience at this particular moment.

    Afghan women, all Muslim women, WE deserve more than allies who speak for us and think that's enough solidarity. Speaking for Afghan women is the bare minimum. Any Zionist American disinformation agency, Gulf state with its petrodollar interests, the Russian state, any external power structures that historically had a hand in atrocities in Afghanistan can very well pay many of you to SPEAK FOR AFGHAN WOMEN. What they won't be doing is disclosing the motive behind speaking up.

    So tell me, what about Afghan women's liberation do you imagine when speaking up for them, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching a wider audience at this particular moment?

    Don't project the reality where Muslims are a minority onto the discourse either. That framing is irrelevant. Muslims are the dominant group in Afghanistan. Use your class analysis. Deconstruct that latent Orientalism that latches onto your leftism while you're at it.

    #Afghanistan #politics #Iran #Taliban #imperialism #paternalism #Muslimwomen #Muslima #womensrights #zionism #misogyny

  3. Are the perpetrators men or the Taliban? Perhaps these da'wah bros are so insecure about their own and their brethren's masculinity, and unwilling to admit complicity in state violence because of the perceived sweeping statement against men in particular. I mean, if you have the energy to not-all-men state violence against women, then you should have the answer or justification for why it is only against women and what exactly you have done to prevent state violence. When blatant misogyny becomes a proper policy, then these men's mental gymnastics to disassociate themselves from the state apparatus are only that, mental gymnastics, nothing more and nothing less.

    HOWEVER, at the same time, this is something we should tread carefully on. What's happening in Iran started from the West's paternalistic rubbish and the Iranian diaspora being imperial agents; it doesn't mean state violence doesn't exist there. The violence is real; the instrumentalisation of that violence for imperial ends is also real. Both are true simultaneously. Everyone engaging in this conversation carries a responsibility to know what they are consenting to. With that in mind, speaking for Afghan women now requires answering: toward what end, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching this particular audience at this particular moment.

    Afghan women, all Muslim women, WE deserve more than allies who speak for us and think that's enough solidarity. Speaking for Afghan women is the bare minimum. Any Zionist American disinformation agency, Gulf state with its petrodollar interests, the Russian state, any external power structures that historically had a hand in atrocities in Afghanistan can very well pay many of you to SPEAK FOR AFGHAN WOMEN. What they won't be doing is disclosing the motive behind speaking up.

    So tell me, what about Afghan women's liberation do you imagine when speaking up for them, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching a wider audience at this particular moment?

    Don't project the reality where Muslims are a minority onto the discourse either. That framing is irrelevant. Muslims are the dominant group in Afghanistan. Use your class analysis. Deconstruct that latent Orientalism that latches onto your leftism while you're at it.

    #Afghanistan #politics #Iran #Taliban #imperialism #paternalism #Muslimwomen #Muslima #womensrights #zionism #misogyny

  4. Are the perpetrators men or the Taliban? Perhaps these da'wah bros are so insecure about their own and their brethren's masculinity, and unwilling to admit complicity in state violence because of the perceived sweeping statement against men in particular. I mean, if you have the energy to not-all-men state violence against women, then you should have the answer or justification for why it is only against women and what exactly you have done to prevent state violence. When blatant misogyny becomes a proper policy, then these men's mental gymnastics to disassociate themselves from the state apparatus are only that, mental gymnastics, nothing more and nothing less.

    HOWEVER, at the same time, this is something we should tread carefully on. What's happening in Iran started from the West's paternalistic rubbish and the Iranian diaspora being imperial agents; it doesn't mean state violence doesn't exist there. The violence is real; the instrumentalisation of that violence for imperial ends is also real. Both are true simultaneously. Everyone engaging in this conversation carries a responsibility to know what they are consenting to. With that in mind, speaking for Afghan women now requires answering: toward what end, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching this particular audience at this particular moment.

    Afghan women, all Muslim women, WE deserve more than allies who speak for us and think that's enough solidarity. Speaking for Afghan women is the bare minimum. Any Zionist American disinformation agency, Gulf state with its petrodollar interests, the Russian state, any external power structures that historically had a hand in atrocities in Afghanistan can very well pay many of you to SPEAK FOR AFGHAN WOMEN. What they won't be doing is disclosing the motive behind speaking up.

    So tell me, what about Afghan women's liberation do you imagine when speaking up for them, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching a wider audience at this particular moment?

    Don't project the reality where Muslims are a minority onto the discourse either. That framing is irrelevant. Muslims are the dominant group in Afghanistan. Use your class analysis. Deconstruct that latent Orientalism that latches onto your leftism while you're at it.

    #Afghanistan #politics #Iran #Taliban #imperialism #paternalism #Muslimwomen #Muslima #womensrights #zionism #misogyny

  5. Are the perpetrators men or the Taliban? Perhaps these da'wah bros are so insecure about their own and their brethren's masculinity, and unwilling to admit complicity in state violence because of the perceived sweeping statement against men in particular. I mean, if you have the energy to not-all-men state violence against women, then you should have the answer or justification for why it is only against women and what exactly you have done to prevent state violence. When blatant misogyny becomes a proper policy, then these men's mental gymnastics to disassociate themselves from the state apparatus are only that, mental gymnastics, nothing more and nothing less.

    HOWEVER, at the same time, this is something we should tread carefully on. What's happening in Iran started from the West's paternalistic rubbish and the Iranian diaspora being imperial agents; it doesn't mean state violence doesn't exist there. The violence is real; the instrumentalisation of that violence for imperial ends is also real. Both are true simultaneously. Everyone engaging in this conversation carries a responsibility to know what they are consenting to. With that in mind, speaking for Afghan women now requires answering: toward what end, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching this particular audience at this particular moment.

    Afghan women, all Muslim women, WE deserve more than allies who speak for us and think that's enough solidarity. Speaking for Afghan women is the bare minimum. Any Zionist American disinformation agency, Gulf state with its petrodollar interests, the Russian state, any external power structures that historically had a hand in atrocities in Afghanistan can very well pay many of you to SPEAK FOR AFGHAN WOMEN. What they won't be doing is disclosing the motive behind speaking up.

    So tell me, what about Afghan women's liberation do you imagine when speaking up for them, through whose infrastructure, and who benefits from this particular framing reaching a wider audience at this particular moment?

    Don't project the reality where Muslims are a minority onto the discourse either. That framing is irrelevant. Muslims are the dominant group in Afghanistan. Use your class analysis. Deconstruct that latent Orientalism that latches onto your leftism while you're at it.

    #Afghanistan #politics #Iran #Taliban #imperialism #paternalism #Muslimwomen #Muslima #womensrights #zionism #misogyny

  6. آقای عارف معاون نخست کره‌الاغ پاستور، دکتر مسعود پزشکیان زبان نفهم: مهمان‌های خارجی در راه #ایران هستند تا در مراسم میلیونی کیلومتری بین‌المللی جابه‌جایی تابوت خالی علی خامنه‌ای شرکت کنند+ عکس از خبرگزاری تاس. #Russia. #england, #saudi, #Aramco, #USA, #EU, #Swiss, #NASA #bitcoin, #AfterTrump, #justvote, #China, #UN, #کدام_اسراییل؟, #lebanon, #Iraq, #turkey, #Taliban, #afghanistan, #pakistan, #india, #indonesia, #Kazan, #BlackSea, #KhazarSea, #argentina, #Fifa, #Iran, #france, #germany, #canada.

  7. No great surprise that Scotland’s former deputy first minister #KateForbes shared the stage with right-wing influencers and #ReformUK MPs at the “anti-woke Davos” — the "Alliance for Responsible Citizenship" (ARC). archive.is/ZqbRP

    But it's still a scandal that this #Taliban woman was ever allowed join the #SNP, let alone rise to near the top.

    #scotpol

  8. No great surprise that Scotland’s former deputy first minister #KateForbes shared the stage with right-wing influencers and #ReformUK MPs at the “anti-woke Davos” — the "Alliance for Responsible Citizenship" (ARC). archive.is/ZqbRP

    But it's still a scandal that this #Taliban woman was ever allowed join the #SNP, let alone rise to near the top.

    #scotpol

  9. Taliban in Brüssel: EU verhandelt über Abschiebungen

    Verhandlungen mit Taliban auf „technischer Ebene“ Nur sollten die Verhandlungen lediglich auf „technischer Ebene“ stattfinden – ohne hochrangige…
    #EuropeSays #EU #Europa #Besuch #Brüssel #Ebene #EuropäischeUnion #Gespräche #heftige #Kabul #Kritik #Taliban #technischer #Verhandlungen
    europesays.com/europa/56951/

  10. Human rights activists criticize EU decision granting Taliban officials visas

    The European Union’s decision to host Taliban officials in Brussels on Tuesday has drawn widespread criticism from human…
    #Europe #EU #EuropeanCommission #Afghanistan #Brussels #EuropeanUnion #Islamists #Refugees #Taliban #Visa
    europesays.com/europe/77192/

  11. @lindarosesmit Hier ging het specifiek om diplomatieke gesprekken met de #taliban met het doel om afgewezen Afghaanse asielzoekers naar Afghanistan te kunnen uitzetten. Waardoor de taliban sowieso al feitelijk diplomatieke erkenning krijgen. Zij willen in ruil daarvoor ook nog diplomatieke vertegenwoordigers in Afghaanse ambassades in de EU (nu nog diplomaten van het voormalige Afghaanse regime). Dat lijkt me veel te veel erkenning voor deze #staatsterroristen. #vrouwenrechten=#mensenrechten

  12. @lindarosesmit Hier ging het specifiek om diplomatieke gesprekken met de #taliban met het doel om afgewezen Afghaanse asielzoekers naar Afghanistan te kunnen uitzetten. Waardoor de taliban sowieso al feitelijk diplomatieke erkenning krijgen. Zij willen in ruil daarvoor ook nog diplomatieke vertegenwoordigers in Afghaanse ambassades in de EU (nu nog diplomaten van het voormalige Afghaanse regime). Dat lijkt me veel te veel erkenning voor deze #staatsterroristen. #vrouwenrechten=#mensenrechten

  13. Diese #DlfDoku habe ich gerade gehört und sie hat mich sehr betroffen gemacht: Verlorene #Freiheit - Afghaninnen unter der #Taliban-Herrschaft #Afghanistan #Frauenrechte

    Ein Blick ins Land, in die Privatwohnung, in das Leben einiger Afghaninnen. Wenn man das noch Leben nennen kann. Danke, #VanessaSchlesier.

    Wenn du das liest und dich auch fragst, was du denn tun kannst: Leite diese Nachricht weiter, auch außerhalb dieser Blase.

    Webseite der Episode: hoerspielundfeature.de/feature

    Mediendatei: podcast-mp3.dradio.de/podcast/

  14. Diese #DlfDoku habe ich gerade gehört und sie hat mich sehr betroffen gemacht: Verlorene #Freiheit - Afghaninnen unter der #Taliban-Herrschaft #Afghanistan #Frauenrechte

    Ein Blick ins Land, in die Privatwohnung, in das Leben einiger Afghaninnen. Wenn man das noch Leben nennen kann. Danke, #VanessaSchlesier.

    Wenn du das liest und dich auch fragst, was du denn tun kannst: Leite diese Nachricht weiter, auch außerhalb dieser Blase.

    Webseite der Episode: hoerspielundfeature.de/feature

    Mediendatei: podcast-mp3.dradio.de/podcast/

  15. Diese #DlfDoku habe ich gerade gehört und sie hat mich sehr betroffen gemacht: Verlorene #Freiheit - Afghaninnen unter der #Taliban-Herrschaft #Afghanistan #Frauenrechte

    Ein Blick ins Land, in die Privatwohnung, in das Leben einiger Afghaninnen. Wenn man das noch Leben nennen kann. Danke, #VanessaSchlesier.

    Wenn du das liest und dich auch fragst, was du denn tun kannst: Leite diese Nachricht weiter, auch außerhalb dieser Blase.

    Webseite der Episode: hoerspielundfeature.de/feature

    Mediendatei: podcast-mp3.dradio.de/podcast/

  16. Die deutsche Polizei bringt zum Zweck der „Identitätsfeststellung“ Afghanen in das Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge in Bonn – zu einem Taliban-Vertreter

    zdf.de/play/shows/zdf-magazin-
    #ZDFMagazinRoyale #Böhmermann #Bonn #Taliban #Bundesamt #BitteLächeln

  17. Die deutsche Polizei bringt zum Zweck der „Identitätsfeststellung“ Afghanen in das Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge in Bonn – zu einem Taliban-Vertreter

    zdf.de/play/shows/zdf-magazin-
    #ZDFMagazinRoyale #Böhmermann #Bonn #Taliban #Bundesamt #BitteLächeln

  18. Are #Project2025 mofos jelly of Iran? I mean it would make sense...

    Tl;Dr? They're basically #US #Taliban. #Dominionist and #reconstructionist ideology basically wants to centralize judicious and extra judicious powers into a clergy.

    Let me tell you, yankie: you don't want that. Pop open a book of yee olde European history and see why that is a terrible idea.

    What is #CREC and how does it shape Pete #Hegseth’s #religious rhetoric?
    theconversation.com/what-is-cr

  19. Are #Project2025 mofos jelly of Iran? I mean it would make sense...

    Tl;Dr? They're basically #US #Taliban. #Dominionist and #reconstructionist ideology basically wants to centralize judicious and extra judicious powers into a clergy.

    Let me tell you, yankie: you don't want that. Pop open a book of yee olde European history and see why that is a terrible idea.

    What is #CREC and how does it shape Pete #Hegseth’s #religious rhetoric?
    theconversation.com/what-is-cr

  20. @DrALJONES #WhiskyPete #Hegseth is not any kind of #Christian except a #FakeChristian. To not offend #Christians during #HolyWeek - and especially on #Easter - refer to him as a #Talibangelical. Nobody cares if the #Taliban is offended. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  21. @DrALJONES #WhiskyPete #Hegseth is not any kind of #Christian except a #FakeChristian. To not offend #Christians during #HolyWeek - and especially on #Easter - refer to him as a #Talibangelical. Nobody cares if the #Taliban is offended. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  22. @DrALJONES #WhiskyPete #Hegseth is not any kind of #Christian except a #FakeChristian. To not offend #Christians during #HolyWeek - and especially on #Easter - refer to him as a #Talibangelical. Nobody cares if the #Taliban is offended. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  23. @DrALJONES #WhiskyPete #Hegseth is not any kind of #Christian except a #FakeChristian. To not offend #Christians during #HolyWeek - and especially on #Easter - refer to him as a #Talibangelical. Nobody cares if the #Taliban is offended. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  24. @DrALJONES #WhiskyPete #Hegseth is not any kind of #Christian except a #FakeChristian. To not offend #Christians during #HolyWeek - and especially on #Easter - refer to him as a #Talibangelical. Nobody cares if the #Taliban is offended. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  25. Orientalism and the Denial of Muslim Political Agency

    Western political discourse often treats Muslims as politically illegible, interpreting Muslim societies through secular or liberal frameworks. This critique examines how Orientalism embedded in Western political thought denies Muslim political agency and frames Islamic resistance as a threat rather than a response to imperial violence.

    wrzky.com/orientalism-and-the-

  26. Orientalism and the Denial of Muslim Political Agency

    Western political discourse often treats Muslims as politically illegible, interpreting Muslim societies through secular or liberal frameworks. This critique examines how Orientalism embedded in Western political thought denies Muslim political agency and frames Islamic resistance as a threat rather than a response to imperial violence.

    wrzky.com/orientalism-and-the-

  27. Orientalism and the Denial of Muslim Political Agency

    Western political discourse often treats Muslims as politically illegible, interpreting Muslim societies through secular or liberal frameworks. This critique examines how Orientalism embedded in Western political thought denies Muslim political agency and frames Islamic resistance as a threat rather than a response to imperial violence.

    wrzky.com/orientalism-and-the-