home.social

#determinant — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #determinant, aggregated by home.social.

  1. creates semantic nodes and clusters #DETERMINANT MATEMATICĂ chatgpt.com?prompt=Analy... AÉPIOT: INDEPENDENT SEMANTIC WEB 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE (EST. 2009): allgraph.ro

    ChatGPT

  2. creates semantic nodes and clusters #DETERMINANT MATEMATICĂ chatgpt.com?prompt=Analy... AÉPIOT: INDEPENDENT SEMANTIC WEB 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE (EST. 2009): allgraph.ro

    ChatGPT

  3. comment Benjamin Pavard, déterminant à Nice, a réussi à inverser la tendance après des prestations ratées

    C’est peut-être un détail pour beaucoup, mais pour Benjamin Pavard, cela veut dire beaucoup. Lorsque Leonardo Balerdi a…
    #Nice #FR #France #Actu #News #Europe #EU #2025 #actu #Actualités #Benjamin #Comment #déterminant #europe #nice #OM #Pavard #Provence-Alpes-Côted'Azur #Républiquefrançaise #réussi
    europesays.com/fr/552910/

  4. For all Transf ∈ ℝn×n, the matrix is invertible if and only if rank(Transf) = n

    The #determinant exists if and only if the transformation matrix is square.
    The determinant in a linear transformation is the (signed) area of the image of the fundamental basis formed by the unit square.

    #algebra #matrices #tutorial #determinants #singularity #math #maths #mathematics #mathStodon #ML #machineLearning #systems

  5. For all Transf ∈ ℝn×n, the matrix is invertible if and only if rank(Transf) = n

    The #determinant exists if and only if the transformation matrix is square.
    The determinant in a linear transformation is the (signed) area of the image of the fundamental basis formed by the unit square.

    #algebra #matrices #tutorial #determinants #singularity #math #maths #mathematics #mathStodon #ML #machineLearning #systems

  6. For all Transf ∈ ℝn×n, the matrix is invertible if and only if rank(Transf) = n

    The exists if and only if the transformation matrix is square.
    The determinant in a linear transformation is the (signed) area of the image of the fundamental basis formed by the unit square.

  7. For all Transf ∈ ℝn×n, the matrix is invertible if and only if rank(Transf) = n

    The #determinant exists if and only if the transformation matrix is square.
    The determinant in a linear transformation is the (signed) area of the image of the fundamental basis formed by the unit square.

    #algebra #matrices #tutorial #determinants #singularity #math #maths #mathematics #mathStodon #ML #machineLearning #systems

  8. For all Transf ∈ ℝn×n, the matrix is invertible if and only if rank(Transf) = n

    The #determinant exists if and only if the transformation matrix is square.
    The determinant in a linear transformation is the (signed) area of the image of the fundamental basis formed by the unit square.

    #algebra #matrices #tutorial #determinants #singularity #math #maths #mathematics #mathStodon #ML #machineLearning #systems

  9. Yeah o/ Mon premier article en anglais, co-écrit avec un collègue, est paru aujourd'hui dans le "Journal of French Language Studies" ! Je suis joie :) Ça parle de corpus, de déterminants, d'histoire du français et y'a, genre whatmille tableaux. Yeah :D

    #Linguistics #Linguistique #Grammaire #Déterminant #LangueFrançaise

    cambridge.org/core/journals/jo

  10. Yeah o/ Mon premier article en anglais, co-écrit avec un collègue, est paru aujourd'hui dans le "Journal of French Language Studies" ! Je suis joie :) Ça parle de corpus, de déterminants, d'histoire du français et y'a, genre whatmille tableaux. Yeah :D

    #Linguistics #Linguistique #Grammaire #Déterminant #LangueFrançaise

    cambridge.org/core/journals/jo

  11. Yeah o/ Mon premier article en anglais, co-écrit avec un collègue, est paru aujourd'hui dans le "Journal of French Language Studies" ! Je suis joie :) Ça parle de corpus, de déterminants, d'histoire du français et y'a, genre whatmille tableaux. Yeah :D

    #Linguistics #Linguistique #Grammaire #Déterminant #LangueFrançaise

    cambridge.org/core/journals/jo

  12. Yeah o/ Mon premier article en anglais, co-écrit avec un collègue, est paru aujourd'hui dans le "Journal of French Language Studies" ! Je suis joie :) Ça parle de corpus, de déterminants, d'histoire du français et y'a, genre whatmille tableaux. Yeah :D

    #Linguistics #Linguistique #Grammaire #Déterminant #LangueFrançaise

    cambridge.org/core/journals/jo

  13. Yeah o/ Mon premier article en anglais, co-écrit avec un collègue, est paru aujourd'hui dans le "Journal of French Language Studies" ! Je suis joie :) Ça parle de corpus, de déterminants, d'histoire du français et y'a, genre whatmille tableaux. Yeah :D

    #Linguistics #Linguistique #Grammaire #Déterminant #LangueFrançaise

    cambridge.org/core/journals/jo

  14. Why is the determinant of the matrix \( \begin{pmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \\ a_2 & b_2 \end{pmatrix} \) equal to \( a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 \)?

    I have found a geometrical interpretation (functor.network/user/414/entry) and with it also started a blog.

    #WordsAndSomeFormulas #Mathematics #MathEdu #Determinant #Geometry

  15. Why is the determinant of the matrix \( \begin{pmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \\ a_2 & b_2 \end{pmatrix} \) equal to \( a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 \)?

    I have found a geometrical interpretation (functor.network/user/414/entry) and with it also started a blog.

    #WordsAndSomeFormulas #Mathematics #MathEdu #Determinant #Geometry

  16. Why is the determinant of the matrix \( \begin{pmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \\ a_2 & b_2 \end{pmatrix} \) equal to \( a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 \)?

    I have found a geometrical interpretation (functor.network/user/414/entry) and with it also started a blog.

    #WordsAndSomeFormulas #Mathematics #MathEdu #Determinant #Geometry

  17. Why is the determinant of the matrix \( \begin{pmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \\ a_2 & b_2 \end{pmatrix} \) equal to \( a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 \)?

    I have found a geometrical interpretation (functor.network/user/414/entry) and with it also started a blog.

    #WordsAndSomeFormulas #Mathematics #MathEdu #Determinant #Geometry

  18. Why is the determinant of the matrix \( \begin{pmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \\ a_2 & b_2 \end{pmatrix} \) equal to \( a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1 \)?

    I have found a geometrical interpretation (functor.network/user/414/entry) and with it also started a blog.

    #WordsAndSomeFormulas #Mathematics #MathEdu #Determinant #Geometry

  19. DETERMINANTS AND THE BAREISS ALGORITHM

    If you have to calculate determinants, and especially if you have to program an algorithm, investigate the Bareiss algorithm. It's remarkably fast; it limits the divisions so that it doesn't introduce needless rounding errors; and if your matrix elements are all integers, Bareiss is guaranteed to give you an integer result.

    I've worked out a way to do Bareiss on pen and paper; here's a link to a PDF showing the technique:

    paprikash.com/lou/bareiss.pdf

    #determinant #bareiss

  20. DETERMINANTS AND THE BAREISS ALGORITHM

    If you have to calculate determinants, and especially if you have to program an algorithm, investigate the Bareiss algorithm. It's remarkably fast; it limits the divisions so that it doesn't introduce needless rounding errors; and if your matrix elements are all integers, Bareiss is guaranteed to give you an integer result.

    I've worked out a way to do Bareiss on pen and paper; here's a link to a PDF showing the technique:

    paprikash.com/lou/bareiss.pdf

    #determinant #bareiss

  21. DETERMINANTS AND THE BAREISS ALGORITHM

    If you have to calculate determinants, and especially if you have to program an algorithm, investigate the Bareiss algorithm. It's remarkably fast; it limits the divisions so that it doesn't introduce needless rounding errors; and if your matrix elements are all integers, Bareiss is guaranteed to give you an integer result.

    I've worked out a way to do Bareiss on pen and paper; here's a link to a PDF showing the technique:

    paprikash.com/lou/bareiss.pdf

    #determinant #bareiss

  22. DETERMINANTS AND THE BAREISS ALGORITHM

    If you have to calculate determinants, and especially if you have to program an algorithm, investigate the Bareiss algorithm. It's remarkably fast; it limits the divisions so that it doesn't introduce needless rounding errors; and if your matrix elements are all integers, Bareiss is guaranteed to give you an integer result.

    I've worked out a way to do Bareiss on pen and paper; here's a link to a PDF showing the technique:

    paprikash.com/lou/bareiss.pdf

    #determinant #bareiss

  23. Hm... I think I will do a little visual intuition #LiaScript doc about the determinant and how it corresponds to area/volume 🤔 I feel that many people are very confused by the #determinant when they encounter it in a linear algebra #math class. At least in mine, it was this weird abstract function (granted, this way of going about things also has its positives), not like a geometric thing. Then you see it popping up in like multivariate integrals with volume elements and its like... huh?

  24. Hm... I think I will do a little visual intuition #LiaScript doc about the determinant and how it corresponds to area/volume 🤔 I feel that many people are very confused by the #determinant when they encounter it in a linear algebra #math class. At least in mine, it was this weird abstract function (granted, this way of going about things also has its positives), not like a geometric thing. Then you see it popping up in like multivariate integrals with volume elements and its like... huh?

  25. Hm... I think I will do a little visual intuition #LiaScript doc about the determinant and how it corresponds to area/volume 🤔 I feel that many people are very confused by the #determinant when they encounter it in a linear algebra #math class. At least in mine, it was this weird abstract function (granted, this way of going about things also has its positives), not like a geometric thing. Then you see it popping up in like multivariate integrals with volume elements and its like... huh?

  26. Hm... I think I will do a little visual intuition doc about the determinant and how it corresponds to area/volume 🤔 I feel that many people are very confused by the when they encounter it in a linear algebra class. At least in mine, it was this weird abstract function (granted, this way of going about things also has its positives), not like a geometric thing. Then you see it popping up in like multivariate integrals with volume elements and its like... huh?

  27. I'm reading Artin's #GaloisTheory and I'm wondering if the #math exposition of the #matrix #determinant relying on homogeneity properties is related to the #BrunnMinkowski #inequality

    I will check my handwritten notes when I'll be in Poland end of July but I remember that homogeneity played a role there.

    This rambling is related to my struggle to understand the #BrascampLieb and #rearrangementInequality. Any hints much appreciated 🥹😅🙈😊

  28. I'm reading Artin's #GaloisTheory and I'm wondering if the #math exposition of the #matrix #determinant relying on homogeneity properties is related to the #BrunnMinkowski #inequality

    I will check my handwritten notes when I'll be in Poland end of July but I remember that homogeneity played a role there.

    This rambling is related to my struggle to understand the #BrascampLieb and #rearrangementInequality. Any hints much appreciated 🥹😅🙈😊

  29. I'm reading Artin's #GaloisTheory and I'm wondering if the #math exposition of the #matrix #determinant relying on homogeneity properties is related to the #BrunnMinkowski #inequality

    I will check my handwritten notes when I'll be in Poland end of July but I remember that homogeneity played a role there.

    This rambling is related to my struggle to understand the #BrascampLieb and #rearrangementInequality. Any hints much appreciated 🥹😅🙈😊

  30. I'm reading Artin's #GaloisTheory and I'm wondering if the #math exposition of the #matrix #determinant relying on homogeneity properties is related to the #BrunnMinkowski #inequality

    I will check my handwritten notes when I'll be in Poland end of July but I remember that homogeneity played a role there.

    This rambling is related to my struggle to understand the #BrascampLieb and #rearrangementInequality. Any hints much appreciated 🥹😅🙈😊

  31. Is there an "addition function" that works simultaneously for the determinant and the permanent?

    #complexity #permanent #determinant

    There is a simple function that is multiplicative for both the determinant and permanent simultaneously, namely \(\det(A \oplus B) = \det(A)\det(B)\) and \(perm(A \oplus B)=perm(A)perm(B)\).

    The map \(A,B \mapsto A \oplus B\) is a projection in Valiant's sense - every coordinate of the output is either one of the input coordinates or a constant.

    Perm and det both have "addition functions" separately. They are slightly more complicated, but still projections. That is, there are projections f,g such that det(f(A,B))=det(A) + det(B) [Malod & Portier, Prop 7 doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2006.09.] and perm(g(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B) [see cstheory.stackexchange.com/a/5].

    But is there a single projection h such that

    det(h(A,B)) = det(A) + det(B)
    and
    perm(h(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B)
    ?

    I don't know, but would love to find out!

    cstheory.stackexchange.com/q/5

  32. Is there an "addition function" that works simultaneously for the determinant and the permanent?

    #complexity #permanent #determinant

    There is a simple function that is multiplicative for both the determinant and permanent simultaneously, namely \(\det(A \oplus B) = \det(A)\det(B)\) and \(perm(A \oplus B)=perm(A)perm(B)\).

    The map \(A,B \mapsto A \oplus B\) is a projection in Valiant's sense - every coordinate of the output is either one of the input coordinates or a constant.

    Perm and det both have "addition functions" separately. They are slightly more complicated, but still projections. That is, there are projections f,g such that det(f(A,B))=det(A) + det(B) [Malod & Portier, Prop 7 doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2006.09.] and perm(g(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B) [see cstheory.stackexchange.com/a/5].

    But is there a single projection h such that

    det(h(A,B)) = det(A) + det(B)
    and
    perm(h(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B)
    ?

    I don't know, but would love to find out!

    cstheory.stackexchange.com/q/5

  33. Is there an "addition function" that works simultaneously for the determinant and the permanent?

    #complexity #permanent #determinant

    There is a simple function that is multiplicative for both the determinant and permanent simultaneously, namely \(\det(A \oplus B) = \det(A)\det(B)\) and \(perm(A \oplus B)=perm(A)perm(B)\).

    The map \(A,B \mapsto A \oplus B\) is a projection in Valiant's sense - every coordinate of the output is either one of the input coordinates or a constant.

    Perm and det both have "addition functions" separately. They are slightly more complicated, but still projections. That is, there are projections f,g such that det(f(A,B))=det(A) + det(B) [Malod & Portier, Prop 7 doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2006.09.] and perm(g(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B) [see cstheory.stackexchange.com/a/5].

    But is there a single projection h such that

    det(h(A,B)) = det(A) + det(B)
    and
    perm(h(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B)
    ?

    I don't know, but would love to find out!

    cstheory.stackexchange.com/q/5

  34. Is there an "addition function" that works simultaneously for the determinant and the permanent?

    #complexity #permanent #determinant

    There is a simple function that is multiplicative for both the determinant and permanent simultaneously, namely \(\det(A \oplus B) = \det(A)\det(B)\) and \(perm(A \oplus B)=perm(A)perm(B)\).

    The map \(A,B \mapsto A \oplus B\) is a projection in Valiant's sense - every coordinate of the output is either one of the input coordinates or a constant.

    Perm and det both have "addition functions" separately. They are slightly more complicated, but still projections. That is, there are projections f,g such that det(f(A,B))=det(A) + det(B) [Malod & Portier, Prop 7 doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2006.09.] and perm(g(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B) [see cstheory.stackexchange.com/a/5].

    But is there a single projection h such that

    det(h(A,B)) = det(A) + det(B)
    and
    perm(h(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B)
    ?

    I don't know, but would love to find out!

    cstheory.stackexchange.com/q/5

  35. Is there an "addition function" that works simultaneously for the determinant and the permanent?

    #complexity #permanent #determinant

    There is a simple function that is multiplicative for both the determinant and permanent simultaneously, namely \(\det(A \oplus B) = \det(A)\det(B)\) and \(perm(A \oplus B)=perm(A)perm(B)\).

    The map \(A,B \mapsto A \oplus B\) is a projection in Valiant's sense - every coordinate of the output is either one of the input coordinates or a constant.

    Perm and det both have "addition functions" separately. They are slightly more complicated, but still projections. That is, there are projections f,g such that det(f(A,B))=det(A) + det(B) [Malod & Portier, Prop 7 doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2006.09.] and perm(g(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B) [see cstheory.stackexchange.com/a/5].

    But is there a single projection h such that

    det(h(A,B)) = det(A) + det(B)
    and
    perm(h(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B)
    ?

    I don't know, but would love to find out!

    cstheory.stackexchange.com/q/5